| From: | Alan Watson |
| Date: | 19 Aug 2001 at 17:34:35 |
| Subject: | Re: BlizKick - HELP |
On 19-Aug-01, Nicholaus Darley-Jones wrote:
>> I have the same files here. It looks like I finally have it working but my
>> CON-output is still much slower than everyone elses. Does MMUlib make much
>> difference?
I use the MMULib+Blizkick with the non mmu Mediator drivers
because it Workbench felt slightly faster than using the mmu
dirvers and no MMULib.I never did any benchmarks though.
>> I am also using a Mediator and Voodoo3 300 card but it still seems that the
>> Blizzard is slower and quite unstable.
But if everyone else is using an Apollo based 060,then there`s
nothing you can do to speed up the con output unless you take
back your Blizzard and get the Apollo instead.The Apollo will
always be faster at the same clock speed(something to do with
the way it handles memory access `differently`)I guess that`s
why Elbox recommended it.
Please don`t ask me to explain how ,as I just remember reading
this somewhere:)
If it`s unstable try using StackAttack and replace MCP`s
PatchControl with TRSaferPatches(on Aminet).Hopefully this
should help.
Regards,
ALan
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get VeriSign's FREE GUIDE: "Securing Your Web Site for Business." Learn about using SSL for serious online security. Click Here!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KYe3qC/I56CAA/yigFAA/dpFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails
To unsubscribe mailto:amigactive-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Anyone sending unsubscribe messages to the list will be SHOT!
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/