- <#1526#>1<#1526#>
- <#492#>``A drug has been defined as `any substance other
than food which by its chemical nature affects the structure or
function of the living organism.';SPMnbsp;;SPMquot; Steven Jonas, Solving
the Drug Problem: A Public Health Approach to the Reduction of
the Use and Abuse of Both Legal and Illegal Recreational Drugs,
18 Hofstra L. Rev.~751, 751 (1990) (quoting National Comm'n on
Marihuana and Drug Abuse, Second Report, Drug Use in
America: Problem in Perspective~9 (1973)). Many psychotropic
drugs are socially acceptable and readily available either
without a prescription (e.g., alcohol) or with a
prescription (e.g., Prozac). See Milt Freudenheim,
The Drug Makers Are Listening to Prozac, N.Y. Times,
Jan.~9, 1994, at~F7 (reporting that since 1988 more than six
million people in United States have been prescribed Prozac,
sales of which reached $1.2 billion worldwide in 1992); Sara
Rimer, With Millions Taking Prozac, A Legal Drug Culture
Arises, N.Y. Times, Dec.~13, 1993, at~A1. Throughout this report
the generic term ``drugs'' is used to refer to the numerous
psychotropic substances, such as heroin, cocaine, and marijuana,
that are now governed by state and federal prohibitionist laws.
See, e.g., 21 U.S.C.A. §~812 (West 1981 Supp.~1994)
(listing five schedules of controlled substances); see also 21
C.F.R. §§~1308.11--1308.15 (1993). Nevertheless, these drugs
are pharmacologically distinct from one another.<#492#>
- <#1528#>2<#1528#>
- <#493#>Specifically, the Committee was charged with
undertaking a study of present drug laws to: (a) determine the
dimensions of the substance use and abuse problem; and (b) review
how our society, and particularly its legal institutions,
currently deal with the problems; and (c) develop options for the
future by determining what the goals and objectives should be and
by developing methods to implement those goals and
objectives.~... Executive Committee Resolution,
Aug.~19, 1986, as amended Oct.~7, 1987.<#493#>
- <#1530#>3<#1530#>
- <#494#>Drug prohibition in the United
States began in 1914 with the Harrison Narcotic Act of 1914, Pub
L. No.~63--223, 38 Stat. 785 (1914). See Robert W. Sweet
Edward A. Harris, Just and Unjust Wars: The War on the War
on Drugs---Some Moral and Constitutional Dimensions of the War on
Drugs, 87 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1302, 1367 n.269 (1993) (noting
that ``[i]t was only with the Harrison Narcotic Act of 1914 and
the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 that individuals were no
longer able to possess narcotics freely or to determine what
counted as therapeutic drugs and as legitimate medical
treatment.;SPMquot;).<#494#>
- <#1532#>4<#1532#>
- <#495#>See,
e.g., And Still the Drugs Sit There, The Economist,
May~21, 1994, at~27 (``Since 1980 America has spent more than
$100 billion in the war on drugs. Despite that, cocaine, heroin
and marijuana are as available and as inexpensive as ever. Drug
use fluctuates, but it is not going away. Indeed, surveys show
that young people now seem increasingly tolerant of drugs and
less worried about the health effects of them, if used in
moderation.;SPMquot;). Despite law enforcement efforts, use of even the
so-called ``hard drugs,'' like heroin, has failed to disappear.
Trip Gabriel, Heroin Finds a New Market Along Cutting Edge
of Style, N.Y. Times, May~8, 1994, at~1 (reporting that
``[h]igh-grade heroin that can be smoked rather than injected has
caught on, on both coasts, in circles whose habits often set
trends---young people piloting the fast lane in the film, rock
and fashion industries;SPMquot;).<#495#>
- <#1534#>5<#1534#>
- <#496#>See James Brooke, In
Colombia, One Victory in a Long War, N.Y. Times, Dec.~3, 1993,
at A12 (quoting Bogota prosecutor as saying, ``It is a secret for
no one that 99 percent of official [Colombian] institutions have
problems with [drug] infiltration.;SPMquot;). Faced with the devastation
wrought by the ``war on drugs,'' Colombians are calling for drug
legalization. James Brooke, Colombians Press for
Legalization of Cocaine, N.Y. Times, Feb.~20, 1994, at~6
(reporting that ``influential opinion makers in Colombia, the
world's largest cocaine producer, are increasingly backing
... legalization;SPMquot;); see also Gabriel Garcia Marquez,
The Useless War, N.Y. Times, Feb.~27, 1994, at~15 (calling
for international agreement legalizing prohibited psychoactive
substances because expensive law enforcement efforts in producing
countries, such as Colombia, have not stemmed consumption in
countries such as the United States). Perhaps in response to the
public outcry in Colombia, a high court there has legalized the
personal use of cocaine, marijuana, and other drugs. Joseph B.
Treaster, Use of Drugs is Legalized By Colombia, N.Y.
Times, May~7, 1994, at~3. But see James Brooke, Colombia
Reimposes Curbs on Marijuana and Cocaine, N.Y. Times, June~2,
1994, at~A14 (reporting that Colombian President Trujillo used
his powers of decree to impose ``a series of restrictions that
essentially limit drug consumption to private residences where
children are not present;SPMquot;).<#496#>
- <#1536#>6<#1536#>
- <#497#>See Mark A.R. Kleiman Aaron J. Saiger,
Drug Legalization: The Importance of Asking The Right
Question, 18 Hofstra L. Rev.~527, 565 (1990) (``The pragmatic
question about drug control policy is how to manage the
availability of a wide range of existing and potential
psychoactives to get the best mix of cost and benefits.;SPMquot;).<#497#>
- <#1543#>7<#1543#>
- <#498#>Using arrest statistics
rather than conviction statistics may provide a misleading
overview of the situation. For example, it is common for the
arresting officer to make a ``felony arrest'' only to have a
prosecutor actually charge a misdemeanor. In addition, felony
conviction statistics will undoubtedly be further affected by
the New York Court of Appeals' decision requiring the
prosecution to prove knowledge of drug weight, People v. Ryan, 82 N.Y.2d 497, 626 N.E.2d 51, 605 N.Y.S.2d 235 (1993).<#498#>
- <#1545#>8<#1545#>
- <#499#>New York State Division of Criminal Justice
Services, Criminal Justice Indicators #8 (Nov.~1992).
Interestingly, there was a 3 drop in felony indictments between
1991 and 1992. Office of Justice Systems Analysis, Bureau of
Statistical Services, Criminal Justice Indicators #1
(Mar.~1993) (``N.Y.S. Arrests and Indictments 1991 vs. 1992;SPMquot;).
Although there was a significant increase in felony drug arrests
in large upstate metropolitan areas, these were somewhat offset
by fewer drug and non-violent felony indictments in New York
City. Id. The actual meaning of these statistics remains
murky, and they should be approached with caution.<#499#>
- <#1547#>9<#1547#>
- <#500#>Report of the Chief
Administrator of the Courts for the Calendar Year Jan.~1, 1991~--
Dec.~31, 1991 4 (1992).<#500#>
- <#1549#>10<#1549#>
- <#501#>Abraham G. Gerges, Changing
Times Require Changing Strategy, N.Y.L.J., July~14, 1993, at~3.<#501#>
- <#1553#>11<#1553#>
- <#502#>Peter Reuter,
Hawks Ascendant: The Punitive Trend of American Drug
Policy, 121 Daedalus 15, 25 n.24 (1992) (citing Bureau of
Justice Statistics, Felony Sentences in State Courts
(1989, 1990)). Possession with intent to sell is a felony in
most states, whereas mere possession is often a misdemeanor.<#502#>
- <#1555#>12<#1555#>
- <#503#>Reuter, supra note
11, at~25.<#503#>
- <#1557#>13<#1557#>
- <#504#>Id. at~25. Again, these statistics should
be approached with caution. State possession and trafficking
statutes tend to vary from state to state.<#504#>
- <#1561#>14<#1561#>
- <#505#>Bureau of Judicial Statistics, United States
Department of Justice, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice
Statistics~-- 1992 20 (1993) (table 1.16). The total 1993 figure
includes the folowing: Judiciary $281.3 million; United States
attorneys $215.9 million; Criminal Division $17.2 million;
United States Marshalls $186.0 million; Organized Crime Drug
Enforcement Task Forces $83.9 million; Tax Division $1.5
million; Weed and Seed Program $10 million.<#505#>
- <#1563#>15<#1563#>
- <#506#>United States Department
of Commerce, Statistical Abstract of the United States
1992, the National Data Book, No.~321 194 (1993) (``U.S.
District Courts---Criminal Cases;SPMquot;).<#506#>
- <#1565#>16<#1565#>
- <#507#>Id.<#507#>
- <#1567#>17<#1567#>
- <#508#>Drugs Crime Data Center
Clearinghouse, Fact Sheet: Drug Data Summary 2 (Apr.~1994).<#508#>
- <#1569#>18<#1569#>
- <#509#>Bureau of Judicial Statistics, United States
Department of Justice, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice
Statistics~-- 1992 544 (1993) (table 5.78).<#509#>
- <#1571#>19<#1571#>
- <#510#>Id.<#510#>
- <#1575#>20<#1575#>
- <#511#>See,
e.g., Letter to the Editor, A Failed ``War'', N.Y.
Times, Dec.~28, 1993, at~A10.<#511#>
- <#1577#>21<#1577#>
- <#59#>In the Northern District
of California, Judge Vaughn R. Walker, a Reagan appointee, has
been quoted as saying, ``I make no bones about my personal view
that the best course of action for us to take is exactly the same
course of action we took after Prohibition, and that is
decriminalization.;SPMquot; The Drug Policy Letter, Spring 1994, at~32.<#59#>
- <#1579#>22<#1579#>
- <#512#>See Joseph B. Treaster, Judges Decline
Drug Cases, Protesting Sentencing Rules, N.Y. Times, April 17,
1993, at~A1.<#512#>
- <#1581#>23<#1581#>
- <#513#>See,
e.g., Abraham G. Gerges, Changing Times Require
Changing Strategy, N.Y.L.J., July 14, 1993, at~3 (noting that
``New York State's prison population has more than doubled over
the last decade, largely due to mandatory sentencing laws and an
increasing number of drug prosecutions.... A major
contribution to the prison population explosion is the
Rockefeller Drug Laws which require substantial prison terms for
the possession or sale of small amounts of drugs.;SPMquot;).<#513#>
- <#1585#>24<#1585#>
- <#514#>Steven
Belenko, The Impact of Drug Offenders on the Criminal
Justice system, in Drugs, Crime and the Criminal Justice
System 65 (Ralph Weisheit ed., 1990).<#514#>
- <#1587#>25<#1587#>
- <#515#>Id. at~66.<#515#>
- <#1591#>26<#1591#>
- <#516#>See Jarret B. Wollstein, Turning the
Tide: Winning Public Support for Ending Drug Prohibition, in
New Frontiers in Drug Policy 90 (Arnold S. Trebach
Kevin B. Zeese eds., 1991) (arguing that the ``war on drugs;SPMquot; is
really a war on liberty).<#516#>
- <#1593#>27<#1593#>
- <#517#>Lester Grinspoon James B. Bakalar, The
War on Drugs---A Peace Proposal, 330 New Eng. J. Med. 357,
357 n.2 (1994) (citing Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Crime in the United States (1991)). Almost one quarter of
these arrests are for simple possession of marijuana. Id.
Indeed, being arrested for simple possession of marijuana is
``the fourth most common cause of arrest in the United States.;SPMquot;
Id. Ironically, studies indicate that marijuana is the
number one cash crop in the United States. Katherine Bishop,
Front in Marijuana War: Business Records, N.Y. Times,
May~24, 1991, at~B6.<#517#>
- ...
Offenses<#1594#>28<#1594#>
-
- <#1651#>29<#1651#>
- <#519#>Grinspoon
Bakalar, supra note 27, at~357.<#519#>
- <#1653#>30<#1653#>
- <#83#>Telephone interview with
Todd R. Clear, Professor Criminal Justice, Rutgers University
(Apr.~28, 1994).<#83#>
- <#1655#>31<#1655#>
- <#520#>N.Y.L.J., June~2, 1994, at~1. ``Only California,
with 120,000 inmates, and Texas, with 71,000 prisoners, had more
people in federal and state facilities.;SPMquot; Id.<#520#>
- <#1657#>32<#1657#>
- <#521#>Department of Justice Report: Two-Thirds
of Non-Violent Offenders Serving Mandatory Minimum Sentences,
The Drug Policy Letter, Spring 1994, at~28.<#521#>
- <#1659#>33<#1659#>
- <#522#>Todd R. Clear, Tougher is Dumber, N.Y. Times,
Dec.~12, 1993, §~1, at~21. The costs for building and operating
prisons can add up quickly: ``In the fiscal year 1992, which ended
June 30, states spent more than $15 billion operating prison
systems and more than $2 billion building prisons. The growth in
operating costs is expected to increase about 5 percent in the
current fiscal year, but spending on construction is expected to
double, to about $4 billion as 112 new prisons are opened to
house 75,000 more inmates.;SPMquot; Michael deCourcy Hinds, Feeling
Prisons' Costs, Governors Weigh Alternatives, N.Y. Times, Aug.~7,
1992, at~A17.<#522#>
- <#1661#>34<#1661#>
- <#523#>Clear, supra note 33, at
21.<#523#>
- <#1663#>35<#1663#>
- <#524#>Anita L. Arcidiacono, Christopher A. Innes,
Bernadette Pelissier Susan Wallace, Hope and Reality:
Drug Treatment in Federal Prisons, in New Frontiers in
Drug Policy 143 (Arnold S. Trebach Kevin B. Zeese eds.,
1991).<#524#>
- <#1665#>36<#1665#>
- <#91#>N.Y.L.J., June
2, 1994, at~1.<#91#>
- <#1667#>37<#1667#>
- <#525#>Jerry Mandel, A
Racist Elephant in the Living Room?, in New Frontiers in
Drug Policy 176 (Arnold S. Trebach Kevin B. Zeese eds.,
1991).<#525#>
- <#1669#>38<#1669#>
- <#526#>Drugs Crime Data Center
Clearinghouse, Fact Sheet: Drug Data Summary 3
(Apr.~1994.)<#526#>
- <#1671#>39<#1671#>
- <#527#>Jerry Mandel, A Racist Elephant in the
Living Room?, in New Frontiers in Drug Policy 176, 178
(Arnold S. Trebach Kevin B. Zeese eds., 1991).<#527#>
- <#1673#>40<#1673#>
- <#528#>Sarah Lyall, Without the Money
to Supply Prison Beds, Officials Consider Reducing Demand, N.Y.
Times, Feb.~17, 1992, at~B5.<#528#>
- <#1675#>41<#1675#>
- <#529#>Id.<#529#>
- <#1677#>42<#1677#>
- <#530#>Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of
Justice Statistics, United States Department of Justice,
Drugs, Crime and the Justice System 195 (Dec.~1992).<#530#>
- <#1679#>43<#1679#>
- <#531#>Some federal judges have complained
bitterly about the federal sentencing guidelines for controlled
substances offenses. E.g., Deborah Pines, Sweet
Hits Mandatory Minimums, N.Y.L.J., Dec.~1, 1993, at~1
(reporting that United States District Judge Robert W. Sweet
``lashed out at the `rigidity of arbitrary mandatory minimum
sentencing laws' as he imposed a sentence of life without parole
on a first-time drug offender;SPMquot;).<#531#>
- <#1681#>44<#1681#>
- <#532#>See, e.g., Katherine
Bishop, Mandatory Sentences in Drug Cases; Is the Law
Defeating Its Purpose?, N.Y. Times, June~8, 1990, at~B16; see
also Julie Stewart, Are These Sentences Fair?, in
New Frontiers in Drug Policy 37, 37 (Arnold S. Trebach
Kevin B. Zeese eds., 1991) (``Each of the 12 federal judicial
circuits that handles criminal cases and the Judicial Conference
of the United States has passed a resolution opposing mandatory
sentencing. The Federal Courts Study Commission has urged their
repeal as has the U.S. Sentencing Commision.;SPMquot;); see also
Department of Justice Report: Two-Thirds of Non-Violent
Offenders Serving Mandatory Minimum Sentences, The Drug Policy
Letter, Spring 1994, at~28 (``The Justice Department review [of
mandatory minimum sentencing entitled ``An Analysis of
Non-Violent Drug Offenders with Minimal Criminal Histories;SPMquot;,
released February 4, 1994] revealed that two-thirds of the
low-level drug offenders in federal prison are serving mandatory
minimum sentences of five or ten years.... The report also
found that 16,316 federal inmates---one out of five
federal prisoners---are low-level drug offenders, which the
report defines as individuals with no record of criminal
violence or of sophisticated criminal activity.;SPMquot;) (emphasis in
original).<#532#>
- <#1683#>45<#1683#>
- <#533#>Bishop,
supra note 44, at~B16 (``With the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of
1986, Congress intended to cripple illegal drug trafficking by
requiring stringent Federal prison sentences for everyone from
large-volume dealers to low-level couriers. The sentences were
based solely on the amount of drugs possessed or sold: 10 years
for 11 pounds of cocaine, 2.2 pounds of heroin or 1.7 ounces of
crack. Then, the Anti-Drug Abuse Amendments Act of 1988 upped the
ante, making life without parole the sentence for those with two
or more prior convictions.;SPMquot;).<#533#>
- <#1685#>46<#1685#>
- <#534#>This type
of dodge was dealt a setback by the New York Court of Appeals's
decision reaffirming the strict application of the so-called
Rockefeller Drug laws and leaving it to the Legislature to
adjust their severity. People v. Thompson, No.~36, 1994
N.Y. LEXIS 329 (Mar.~30, 1994).<#534#>
- <#1687#>47<#1687#>
- <#535#>Gary
Spencer, Cuomo Backs $1.1 Billion Courts Budget; 8.6
Percent Increase called ``Necessary;SPMquot;, N.Y.L.J., Jan.~19, 1994,
at 1.<#535#>
- <#1689#>48<#1689#>
- <#536#>Clear, supra note 33.<#536#>
- <#1691#>49<#1691#>
- <#537#>Drugs Crime Data Center
Clearinghouse, Fact Sheet: Drug Data Summary 3
(Apr.~1994).<#537#>
- <#1697#>50<#1697#>
- <#538#>See Mathea Falco, The Making of a Drug Free
America (1992).<#538#>
- <#1699#>51<#1699#>
- <#539#>See Jos. H. Choate, Jr.,
Reasons for The Repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment, An
Address before The New York Civic Forum On January 17, 1930
(library collection of the Association of the Bar of the City of
New York) (``[W]hy does National Prohibition ... seem to me,
as a lawyer, unwise? First, because it is and has proved an
unenforceable rule: and every such rule undermines the
law-abiding disposition of the community.;SPMquot;).<#539#>
- <#1701#>52<#1701#>
- <#121#>The Harrison Narcotics Act,
Pub. L. No. 63--223, 38 Stat. 785 (1914).<#121#>
- <#1705#>53<#1705#>
- <#540#>The Clinton Administration sought to combine
the DEA with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but the DEA
resisted such efforts. Marianne Lavelle, Gore Sets His
Sights on the DEA, Nat'l L. J., Sept.~13, 1993, at~3; Neil A.
Lewis, White House Seeks to Combine F.B.I. with Drug
Agency, N.Y. Times, Aug.~19, 1993, at~A1. Ultimately, the plan
to merge the two was abandoned.<#540#>
- <#1709#>54<#1709#>
- <#541#>See Felicia R. Lee, On
Front Line of the Drug Wars, Police Corruption is Nothing New,
N.Y. Times, Apr.~16, 1994, at~A1.<#541#>
- <#1711#>55<#1711#>
- <#542#>See, e.g.,
Clifford Kraus, 12 Police Officers Charged in Drug
Corruption Sweep; Bratton Sees More Arrests, N.Y. Times,
Apr.~16, 1994, at~A1; David Kocieniewski, ``Dirty 30;SPMquot;
Precinct---12 of City's ``Finest;SPMquot; Accused of Outcrooking
Crooks, Newsday, Apr.~16, 1994, at~A5; see also Officer
Charged in Drug Case, N.Y. Times, Oct.~2, 1991, at~B3
(reporting FBI's arrest of police officer, who headed local
joint drug task force, for selling cocaine and marijuana).<#542#>
- <#1713#>56<#1713#>
- <#543#>James Ostrowski, The Moral and Practical
Case for Drug Legalization, 18 Hofstra L. Rev. 607, 663
n.264 (1990) (``Drug money corrupts law enforcement officials.
Corruption is a major problem in drug enforcement because drug
agents are given tremendous power over desperate persons in
possession of large amounts of cash. Drug corruption charges
have been leveled against FBI agents, policemen, prison guards,
U.S. Customs Inspectors, even prosecutors.;SPMquot;); John T. Schuler
Arthur McBride, Notes From the Front: A Dissident
Law-Enforcement Perspective on Drug Prohibition, 18 Hofstra L.
Rev. 893, 914 (1990) (``corruption is a concomitance of
narcotics enforcement;SPMquot;).<#543#>
- <#1715#>57<#1715#>
- <#544#>Police corruption also
exists when overzealous police officers make drug arrests
supported with perjured testimony, which undermines the core of
the criminal justice system. See Joe Sexton, New York
Police Often Lie Under Oath, Report Says, N.Y. Times, Apr.~22,
1994, at~A1, B3 (reporting that ``Charles J. Hynes, the District
Attorney for Brooklyn, said that police officers often tried to
get around the problem of needing probable cause before making
an arrest by what he called the `dropsy syndrome'---falsely
testifying that a suspect `tossed a package containing white
powder to the ground' as he was approached.;SPMquot;); Today's
News---Update, N.Y.L.J., May~12, 1994, at~1 (reporting that
Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau's office is
reviewing 1,500 convictions obtained over past four years to
determine if they should be vacated because of perjured
testimony from police in 30th precinct in Harlem).<#544#>
- <#1719#>58<#1719#>
- <#545#>See,
e.g., David Gonzalez, Unmasking Roots of Washington
Heights Violence, N.Y. Times, Oct.~17, 1993, at~29 (reporting
that Washington Heights is ``a natural locale for selling drugs,
which offers the promise of quick money to youths who find
themselves idle on street corners day after day;SPMquot;).<#545#>
- <#1723#>59<#1723#>
- <#546#>``War On Drugs'' Seen As Threat to
Constitution Minorities, 49 Crim. L. Rep. (BNA) at~1477
(Sept.~4, 1991) (reporting that panelists at American Bar
Association program opined that ``war on drugs;SPMquot; is a ``war on
minorities;SPMquot; and that Bureau of Justice statistics show that in
1991 black males constituted 12 of overall population and
almost 50 of prison population).<#546#>
- <#1725#>60<#1725#>
- <#547#>See Rick Bragg, Liberators or
Oppressors? Two Views of the Police in Clifton, S.I., N.Y.
Times, May~2, 1994, at~B3 (reporting resident saying that
``[t]here is a feeling that the community is being surrounded;SPMquot;).<#547#>
- <#1729#>61<#1729#>
- <#548#>Grinspoon Bakalar, supra note 27, at~357
(citing S. Wisotksy, A society of Suspects: The War on
Drugs and Civil Liberties 180 (1992)); see also James Ostrowski,
The Moral and Practical Case for Drug Legalization, 18
Hofstra L. Rev. 607, 664 (1990) (``Drug war hysteria has created
an atmosphere in which long-cherished rights are discarded
wherever drugs are concerned. Suspected drug users are subject to
urine testing, roadblocks, routine strip searches, school locker
searches without probable cause, abuse of the good faith
exception to the exclusionary rule, preventive detention, and
nonjudicial forfeiture.;SPMquot;) (footnotes omitted).<#548#>
- <#1731#>62<#1731#>
- <#549#>For a more extensive treatment of this subject,
see Paul Finkelman, The Second Casualty of War: Civil
Liberties and the War on Drugs, 66 So. Cal. L. Rev. 1389
(1993).<#549#>
- <#1733#>63<#1733#>
- <#149#>111 S. Ct. 2382 (1991).<#149#>
- <#1735#>64<#1735#>
- <#550#>Linda Greenhouse, Police Are Backed On
Bus Searches, N.Y. Times, June 21, 1991, at~A1. Justice
Marshall stated in dissent, in which he was joined by Justices
Blackmun and Stevens, ``In my view, the Fourth Amendment clearly
condemns the suspicionless, dragnet-style sweep of intrastate or
interstate buses;SPMquot; due to coercion and unjustified intrusion upon
citizens' Fourth Amendment rights. Florida v. Bostick,
111 S. Ct. at~2394 (Marshall, J., dissenting).<#550#>
- <#1737#>65<#1737#>
- <#551#>Florida v. Bostick, 111 S.
Ct. at~2394 (Marshall, J., dissenting). These decisions include
the approval of ``drug courier profiles,'' which are based upon
the appearance and behavior of the suspects and which are used by
the police to identify persons who may be carrying drugs. See
United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 13--14 (1989)
(Brennan, J. dissenting) (listing cases showing profile's
``chameleon-like way of adapting to any particular set of
observations;SPMquot;).<#551#>
- <#1739#>66<#1739#>
- <#552#>Grinspoon Bakalar, supra note
27, at~357 (citing S. Wisotksy, A Society of Suspects: The
War on Drugs and Civil Liberties 180 (1992)).<#552#>
- <#1741#>67<#1741#>
- <#553#>Grinspoon Bakalar, supra note 27,
at~359 n.14 (citing R.J. Dennis, The American People Are
Starting to Question the Drug War, in Drug Prohibition and
the Conscience of Nations (Arnold S. Trebach Kevin B. Zeese
eds., 1990)).<#553#>
- <#1745#>68<#1745#>
- <#554#>See, e.g., United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d 37, 46 (2d Cir. 1993); United States
v. 384--390 West Broadway, 964 F.2d 1244, 1248 (1st Cir. 1992); see also Pratt Peterson, Civil Forfeiture in the
Second Circuit, 65 St. John's L. Rev. 653 (1991) (``Perhaps no
area of law embodies more legal fictions---and better illustrates
their use and misuse---than does civil forfeiture.;SPMquot;).<#554#>
- <#1747#>69<#1747#>
- <#555#>Jarret B.
Wollstein, Turning the Tide: Winning Public Support for
Ending Drug Prohibition, in New Frontiers in Drug Policy
90, 90 (Arnold S. Trebach Kevin B. Zeese eds., 1991)<#555#>
- <#1749#>70<#1749#>
- <#556#>Drugs Crime Data Center Clearinghouse,
Fact Sheet: Drug Data Summary 2 (Apr.~1994).<#556#>
- <#1751#>71<#1751#>
- <#557#>In United States v. James Daniel Good
Real Property, 114 S. Ct. 492 (1993), the Supreme Court
observed: ``The extent of the Government's financial stake in
drug forfeiture is apparent from a 1990 memo, in which the
Attorney General urged United States Attorneys to increase the
volume of forfeitures in order to meet the Department of
Justice's annual budget target: `We must significantly increase
production to reach our budget target.~... Failure to achieve
the $470 million projection would expose the Department's
forfeiture program to criticism and undermine confidence in our
budget projections. Every effort must be made to increase
forfeiture income during the remaining three months of [fiscal
year] 1990.';SPMnbsp;;SPMquot; 114 S. Ct. at~502 n.2 (quoting Executive Office
for United States Attorneys, United States Dep't of Justice,
38 United States Attorney's Bulletin 190 (1990)).<#557#>
- <#1753#>72<#1753#>
- <#558#>See, e.g., United States v. 92 Buena Vista Ave., 113 S. Ct. 1126, 1135 (1993).<#558#>
- <#1755#>73<#1755#>
- <#559#>See United States v. Daccarett, 6
F.3d 37, 55 (2d Cir. 1993); United States v. All Right,
Title and Interest in Real Property, 983 F.2d 396 (2d Cir. 1993). Even with this low standard, the courts have had to
remain vigilant to root out governmental abuse. See,
e.g., United States v. $31,990, 982 F.2d 851,
856 (2d Cir. 1993) (``Since `there is little to discourage
federal agents from seizing property illegally, and then seeking
evidence of probable cause,' courts must guard against the abuse
of forfeiture in the government's zeal to apprehend and
prosecute drug dealers.;SPMquot;); United States v. $19,910.00
in U.S. Currency, 16 F.3d 1051, 1067 (9th Cir. 1994)
(``Requiring the government to show that it had probable cause
at the time it brought the action would only discourage filings
of forfeiture when probable cause does not exist. Such a result
is entirely proper. Without such a rule, government agents might
be tempted to bring proceedings (and thereby seize property) on
the basis of mere suspicion or even enmity and then engage in a
fishing expedition to discover whether probable cause exists.;SPMquot;).<#559#>
- <#1757#>74<#1757#>
- <#560#>See, e.g., United States v. Daccarett, 6 F.3d at~57.<#560#>
- <#1759#>75<#1759#>
- <#561#>Adding a reasonableness
component to the statutory innocent owner defense, some courts
have asserted that they ``do not expect the common land owner to
eradicate a problem our law enforcement organizations cannot
control.;SPMquot; United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate,
963 F.2d 1496, 1506 (11th Cir. 1993) (citing cases); see also
United States v. All Right Title and Interest in
Property, 753 F. Supp. 721, 125 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) (``a property
owner is not required to take heroic or vigilante measures to
rid his or her property of narcotics activity.~... Indeed
encouraging such a standard would result in the dangerous
precedent of making property owners in drug-infested
neighborhoods into substitute police forces.;SPMquot;).<#561#>
- <#1761#>76<#1761#>
- <#562#>See, e.g., United States v. 4492 S. Livonia Rd., 889 F.2d 1258 (2d Cir. 1989).<#562#>
- <#1763#>77<#1763#>
- <#563#>See Austin v. United States, 113 S.
Ct. 280 (1993).<#563#>
- <#1765#>78<#1765#>
- <#564#>Rorie Sherman,
Weeding Out Pot Growers, Nat'l L. J., Sept.~23, 1991,
at~10 (reporting DEA use of subpoena power against hydroponics
industry).<#564#>
- <#1769#>79<#1769#>
- <#565#>U.S. Const., amend. IX; see Robert W. Sweet
Edward A. Harris, Just and Unjust Wars: The War on the War
on Drugs---Some Moral and Constitutional Dimensions of the War on
Drugs, 87 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1302, 1346--72 (1993) (arguing that
``defining the scope of the right to drugs as a fundamental
constitutional right [protected by the Ninth Amendment] poses no
greater difficulty than defining the scope of other unenumerated
constitutional rights that have been recognized and protected
previously by the Court.;SPMquot;).<#565#>
- <#1771#>80<#1771#>
- <#566#>Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479
(1965).<#566#>
- <#1773#>81<#1773#>
- <#567#>Roe
v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).<#567#>
- <#1775#>82<#1775#>
- <#568#>Stanley v. Georgia, 394
U.S. 557 (1969). But see Osbourne v. Ohio, 110 S. Ct. 1691 (1990) (holding that states can outlaw private possession
of child pornography with minors as subjects).
At least one
commentator has noted the apparent lack of distinction between
the private possession of adult pornography in the home and drug
use: ``If the Stanleys of the world could obtain from a new drug
called `obscenamine' the sensation that Stanley in fact obtained
from the obscene film whose possession Georgia unsucessfully
sought to make a crime, one might expect a legislative attempt
to make possession or use of obscenamine a criminal offense. The
precedents appear, on the whole to affirm the state's power to
take such a step. Yet it does seem bizarre to draw the
distinction implicit in such an outcome. To be sure, at stake in
Stanley was the value of preventing government from
rummaging through someone's library to discover evidence of his
mental and emotional tastes. yet is it so much less offensive
for government to rummage through someone's medicine chest,
kitchen, and wine cellar to put together a picture of his oral
and chemical predilections? In either case, the offense is
governmental invasion and usurpation of the choices that
together constitute an individual's psyche.;SPMquot; Laurence Tribe,
American Constitutional Law §~15--7, at~1326 (2d ed.
1988).<#568#>
- <#1777#>83<#1777#>
- <#569#>See Employment
Div., Dep't of Human Resources v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1993)
(holding that states may prohibit sacramental peyote use); see
also People v. Shepard, 50 N.Y.2d 640, 409 N.E.2d 840,
431 N.Y.S.2d 363 (1980) (holding that possession of marijuana in
home was not protected by right of privacy).
The courts in Germany, however, have held that it is
unconstitutional for the government to tolerate the use of some
intoxicants, such as alcohol, while criminalizing others, such as
marijuana and hashish. Stephen Kinzer, German Court Allows
Possession of Small Amounts of Marijuana, N.Y. Times, May~3,
1994, at~A12 (reporting that Germany's highest court has ruled
that equal protection provision of German constitution protects
uses of small amounts of marijuana and hashish); see also Stephen
Kinzer, A Pro-Drug Ruling Stirs the Pot in Germany, N.Y.
Times, Mar.~3, 1992, at~A5 (reporting that appeals court in
Lubeck, Germany, ``ruled that keeping alcohol legal while banning
hashish and marijuana violated a constitutional provision
guaranteeing all citizens equality before the law ... [and] a
provision guaranteeing personal freedoms that do not infringe on
the rights of others;SPMquot;). For a similar analysis, see Laurence
Tribe, American Constitutional Law §~15--7, at~1325--26
(2d ed. 1988).<#569#>
- <#1779#>84<#1779#>
- <#570#>Grinspoon
Bakalar, supra note 27, at~357. Law enforcement
techniques specially aimed at drug users tend to catch otherwise
law-abiding citizens who are functioning members of society. See
Steven Lee Meyers, Washington Hts. Drug Sweep Nets 49,
N.Y. Times, Aug.~13, 1993, at B3 (reporting 12 hour operation in
Washington Heights, New York, resulted in 49 arrests for
possession of small amounts of controlled substances, including
``a jeweler, a carpet layer, an electrical engineer, a pipe
fitter, a college student and an auditor at the Internal Revenue
Service;SPMquot;; ``[t]here were men and women, from 18 to 63 years old,
most of them white, most of them from New Jersey suburbs;SPMquot;); see
also Lisa W. Foderaro, An Arrest Divides the Generations,
N.Y. Times, Feb. 8, 1992, at~23 (reporting guilty plea by a
49-year old lawyer on federal charges of growing marijuana on 30
acres of his property in upstate New York; felony charge carried
potential sentence of 5 to 40 years in prison, $2 million in
fines, forfeiture of property, and possible disbarment).<#570#>
- <#1781#>85<#1781#>
- <#571#>Grinspoon Bakalar, supra note 27,
at~357; see also id. at~359 (``Federal involvement
emphasizes the unfortunate imagery of a patriotic war in which
drugs and drug users are the enemy.;SPMquot;); Letter to the Editor,
Let's Take the Crime Out of the Drugs, N.Y. Times,
Jan.~20, 1994, at~A20 (Dr. Howard I. Hurtig, Professor of
Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, stating, ``Congress and
the White House could help mightily by dismantling the illogical
cycle of law enforcement-punishment for `crimes' fabricated by
misguided policy makers.;SPMquot;).<#571#>
- <#1783#>86<#1783#>
- <#572#>Grinspoon Bakalar, supra note 27,
at~360; see also John Noble Wilford, The Earliest Wine:
Vintage 3500 B.C. and Robust, N.Y. Times, Apr.~30, 1991, at~C1
(``[A]rcheologists have now found chemical evidence that people
were making and drinking wine at least as long ago as the fourth
millennium B.C., the earliest established occurrence of wine
anywhere in the world.~... People probably imbibed to
relieve the stresses of living in an increasingly complex and
urbanized society.;SPMquot;); L. Kutner, Parent Child, N.Y.
Times, Nov.~4, 1993, at~C14 (``Many [drug-abuse] researchers
... state that seeking altered states of consciousness is
normal and healthy.;SPMquot;). ``Marijuana has been in use since at
least A.D. 400, primarily for its euphoric effects and
relatively low toxicity. The world's earliest known marijuana
smoker was a 14-year-old girl who apparently died about 1,600
years ago while giving birth. THC was found in abdominal area of
her skeletal remains in a tomb near Jerusalem.;SPMquot;
``Marijuana Euphoria'' Comes From Within, Too, Study
Says, Newsday, Aug.~17, 1993, at~63 (reporting that human brain
contains natural substance that seems to be equivalent to
tetrahydrocannabinol (``THC''), the principal psychoactive
component of marijuana).<#572#>
- <#1785#>87<#1785#>
- <#573#>Grinspoon
Bakalar, supra note 27, at~360.<#573#>
- <#1787#>88<#1787#>
- <#574#>The Court
has recognized that ``[t]he fantasies of a drug addict are his
own, and beyond the reach of the state.;SPMquot; Paris Adult
Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 67 (1973).<#574#>
- <#1791#>89<#1791#>
- <#575#>See James Ostrowski, The Moral and
Practical Case for Drug Legalization, 18 Hofstra L. Rev. 607,
650 (1990) (``Prohibition also causes what the media and police
misname `drug-related violence.' This prohibition-related
violence includes all the random shootings and murders associated
with black market drug transactions: ripoffs, eliminating the
competition, killing informers and suspected informers. Those who
doubt that prohibition is responsible for this violence need only
note the absence of violence in the legal drug market. For
example, there is no violence associated with the production,
distribution, and sale of alcohol. Such violence was ended by the
repeal of Prohibition.;SPMquot;) (emphasis in original).<#575#>
- <#1793#>90<#1793#>
- <#576#>Researchers
working with the New York City Police department analyzed
approximately one-quarter of the city's 1988 homicides. The
identified five types of relationships between drugs and murder:
``Their term `psychopharmacological' refers to homicides in
which ingesting a drug or drug withdrawal caused a drug user to
become excitable, irrational, and[/]or violent. Death might also
have occurred because of alterations in the drug user's behavior
that drew violence upon them from others. `Economic-compulsive'
refers to instances in which a drug user engaged in violent
crimes in order to obtain money for drugs. `Systemic' refers to
instances in which a dealer or user became violent in order to
compete within a violent black market. `Multidimensional' refers
to homicides that entailed more than one of these forms, making
it difficult to say which was most responsible. In homicides
with `drug related dimensions' the drug was used by the
perpetrator and/or the victim but was not sonsidered the primary
reason for the homicide. These five categories were used to
categorize all cocaine-related homicides.
... [T]he
pharmcological model fits cocaine and crack related crime only
rarely. Similarly, the economic-compulsive model applies to only
a very small portion of the cocaine and crack related crime.
However, the systemic model does account for a substantial amount
of crime.~... [M]ost cocaine-related homicides are systemic
and most systemic homicides are cocaine-related.
... [T]here is still nosubstantial evidence to support the
hypothesis that drugs, in this case cocaine, cause crime.''
Randy T. Salekin Bruce K. Alexander, Cocaine and
Crime, in New Frontiers in Drug Policy 105, 111 (Arnold
S. Trebach Kevin B. Zeese eds., 1991); cf. James
Ostrowski, The Moral and Practical Case for Drug
Legalization, 18 Hofstra L. Rev. 607, 647 (1990) (``It is
estimated that at least forty percent of all property crime in
the United States is committed by drug users so that they can
maintain their expensive habits.;SPMquot;).<#576#>
- <#1795#>91<#1795#>
- <#577#>F.B.I. Says
Los Angeles Gang Has Drug Cartel Ties, N.Y. Times, Jan.~10,
1992, at~A12.<#577#>
- <#1797#>92<#1797#>
- <#578#>See Joseph L. Galiber, A Bill to Repeal
Criminal Drug Laws: Replacing Prohibition with Regulation, 18
Hofstra L. Rev. 831, 849 n.89 (1990).<#578#>
- <#1799#>93<#1799#>
- <#579#>``The
murder rate rose with the start of Prohibition, remained high
during Prohibition, and then declined for 11 consecutive
years when Prohibition ended. The rate of assaults with a
firearm rose with Prohibition and declined for 10
consecutive years after Prohibition.;SPMquot; James Ostrowski,
Thinking About Drug Legalization, Cato Institute Policy
Analysis No. 121, May 25, 1989, at~1 (emphasis in original)
(citation omitted).<#579#>
- <#1801#>94<#1801#>
- <#227#>While a new approach to drug policy would not
destroy markets created by use by the under-aged, that problem
could be dealth with separately and confronted directly, as is
the case with alcohol and tobacco use.<#227#>
- <#1805#>95<#1805#>
- <#580#>See,
e.g., H. Kleber, Our Current Approach to Drug
Abuse---Progress, Problems, Proposals, 330 New eng. J. Med. 361, 361 (1994) (``Most drug-abuse experts and historians agree
that we are in the declining phase of a drug epidemic that began
about 30 years ago.;SPMquot;). But see Drug Use Increasing Despite
Federal War, Gannet Suburban Newspapers, May~12, 1994, at~16A
(Quoting White house drug policy director Lee Brown as saying
things are ``not getting any better'').<#580#>
- <#1807#>96<#1807#>
- <#581#>See Douglas Jehl, Clinton
to Use Drug Plan to Fight Crime, N.Y. Times, Feb. 10, 1994,
at~D20 (reporting that experts estimate that 4 to 6 million
Americans are heavy drug users); Drug Use Increasing
Despite Federal War, Gannet Suburban Newspapers, May~12, 1994,
at~16A (reporting that recent federal report found heroin use has
increased in the Southwest, West, and part of the South,
marijuana use continues to rise nationally, cocaine use remains
stable; reporting that ``the number of people using drugs monthly
dropped about 21 percent from 1991 to 1992---from 14.5 million to
11.4 million;SPMquot; but that ``the number of hard-core users---about
2.7 million people who consume the bulk of the nation's $49
billion worth of drugs annually---hasn't changed much since
1988;SPMquot;).<#581#>
- <#1809#>97<#1809#>
- <#582#>Joseph B. Treaster, Survey Finds
Marijuana Use is Up in High Schools, N.Y. Times, Feb.~1, 1994,
at~A1, A14 (reporting that 26 of high school seniors
acknowledged using marijuana in 1993, up from 21.9 in 1992;
similarly 6.8 of high school seniors acknowledged using LSD
in 1993, up from 5.6 in 1992).<#582#>
- <#1811#>98<#1811#>
- <#583#>Kleber, supra note 95, at~361.<#583#>
- <#1813#>99<#1813#>
- <#584#>Letter to the
Editor, Put Drug War Price at $500 Billion, N.Y. Times,
July~1, 1992, at~A22 (Ernest Drucker and Peter R. Arno,
respectively professor and associate professor of epidemiology
and social medicine at Albert Einstein College of Medicine); see
also Joseph P. Treaster, Echoes of Prohibition: 20 Years
of War on Drugs, and No Victory Yet, N.Y. Times, June~14, 1992,
§~4, at~7; James Ostrowski, Thinking about Drug
Legalization, Cato Institute Policy Analysis No.~121, May~25,
1989, at~6 (``there is a real danger that escalating the war on
drugs would squander much of the nation's wealth;SPMquot;).<#584#>
- <#1815#>100<#1815#>
- <#585#>Letter to the
Editor, Put Drug War Price at $500 Billion, N.Y. Times,
July~1, 1992, at~A22.<#585#>
- <#1817#>101<#1817#>
- <#586#>Grinspoon Bakalar, supra
note 27, at~358 (``Public-opinion surveys also suggest that few
people who do not now use illicit drugs would use them if the laws
changed.~... Only 2 percent of people who do not use cocaine
say they might try it if it were legalized, and 93 percent state
vehemently that they would not.;SPMquot;).<#586#>
- <#1819#>102<#1819#>
- <#587#>See,
e.g., David T. Courtwright, Should We Legalize Drugs?
History Answers: No, 44 Amer. Heriage 41, 50 (1993); Josepha A.
Califano, Jr. Battle Lines in the War on Drugs: No, Fight
Harder, N.Y. Times, Dec.~15, 1993, at~A27.
Many proponents
of the current prohibitionist laws argue that users of
psychoactive substances would not be able to control their
consumption if such substances were legalized and readily
available. E.g., Letter to the Editor, Can Drugs Be
Used Only in Moderation, N.Y. Times, Feb.~25, 1994, at~A28
(Philip J. Pauly, an Associate Professor of the History of
Science at Rutgers University, argues that it is unlikely that
``recreational users of cocaine and heroin could indulge
`moderately' as part of genteel social behavior;SPMquot;); see also
Letter to the Editor, Why Marijuana Should Remain
Illegal, N.Y. Times, Feb.~26, 1994, §~1, at~22 (Stephen H.
Green, Acting Administrator of the DEA, argues that marijuana
should continue to be prohibited in part because users would not
be content wit marijuana distributed by ``health regulators'' if
the chemical causing its psychoactive effects,
tetrahydrocannabinol (``THC''), were controlled; users would
resort, instead, to ``illegal growers pushing their higher
potency marijuana;SPMquot;). These assertions, however, are propounded
without any empirical supporting evidence.<#587#>
- <#1821#>103<#1821#>
- <#588#>E.g., Letter to the Editor,
Can Drugs Be used Only in Moderation, N.Y. Times,
Feb.~25, 1994, at~A28 (``For today's situation to be comparable
[to the circumstances leading to the repeal of Prohibition], we
would need to establish a drug control system in which most
recreational users of cocaine and heroin could indulge
`moderately' as part of genteel social behavior. I think that is
unlikely.;SPMquot;).<#588#>
- <#1823#>104<#1823#>
- <#589#>Both ``greater social disapproval of marijuana use
and greater perceived risk of harm from marijuana use were found
to account for a substantial portion of the decline both in the
U.S. and Canada.;SPMquot; Patricia G. Erickson Yuet W. Cheung,
Drug Crime Legal Control: Lessons from the Canadian
Experience, 19 Contemporary Drug Problems, 247, 260 (1992).<#589#>
- <#1825#>105<#1825#>
- <#590#>``Over
the past 30 years, tremendous public health efforts have been
made to persuade smokers to quit and to discourage others from
adopting their habit. As a result, cigarette smoking prevalence
has declined significantly, especially among men. In 1955, nearly
60 of men and 28 of women were smokers. By 1990, only 28 of
men and 23 of women reported that they smoked cigarettes.;SPMquot;
American Cancer Society, Risk Report 5 (1993).<#590#>
- <#1827#>106<#1827#>
- <#591#>See, e.g.,
J. G. Bachman, L. D. Johnston, P. M. O'Malley R. H. Humphrey,
Explaining the Recent Decline in Marijuana Use:
Differentiating the Effects of Perceived Risks, Disapproval, and
General Lifestyle Factors, 29 J. of Health and Social Behavior
92, 107 (1988). ``[T]he data suggest strongly that if there had
not been distinct increase in negative attitudes about
marijuana, we would not have found steadily lower levels of
marijuana use in each succeeding class of high school seniors
since 1979.~... [B]oth perceived risks and personal
disapproval of marijuana use, especially regular use, have risen
sharply since 1978.~... [T]he analyses suggest that if
perceived risks and disapproval associated with regular
marijuana use had not risen substantially in recent years, the
decline in actual use would not have occurred.'' Id.<#591#>
- <#1829#>107<#1829#>
- <#592#>``The
thrust of numerous findings demonstrated the very weak role of
legal threats compared with extralegal factors in decisions to
use or not use cannabis. Marijuana use became the most studied
crime in the deterrence literature, enabling one investigator who
exploited it for a comparative analysis of methodologies to
conclude that however and wherever studied, `perceptions of
formal sanctions play little or no role in explaining variance in
rates of self-reported marijuana use.';SPMnbsp;;SPMquot; Erickson Cheung,
supra note 104, at~258 (citation omitted.)
Jeffrey Fagan and William Spelman, Associate Professors,
respectively, of criminal justice at Rutgers University and of
public affairs at the University of Texas, have argued that
market forces, more than law enforcement efforts, have the
greatest impact on the deleterious health effects of the
so-called ``drug problem;SPMquot;: ``Drug epidemics come and go in New
York and other large cities. The behavior of legal institutions
seems to be far less influential in these epidemics than the
natural ebb and flow of each drug era. Acting much like consumers
in a free market, drug users and sellers regulate their own
affairs, setting rules and transmitting knowledge about the
dangers and effect of particular drugs.'' Letter to the Editor,
Market Forces at Work, N.Y. Times, Feb.~11, 1994, at~A34.<#592#>
- <#1831#>108<#1831#>
- <#593#>E.J. Mishan, Narcotics:
The Problem and the Solution, 61 Pol. Quar. 441, 458 (1990)
(emphasis in original); see also Sidney Zion, Battle Lines
in the War on Drugs: Make Them Legal, N.Y. Times, Dec.~15, 1993,
at~A27 (``;SPMnbsp;`Under prohibition every addict becomes a
salesman.~... He has to bring in new customers so that he can
earn enough money to feed his habit.';SPMnbsp;;SPMquot; (quoting British
physician John Marks)). ``[T]here is at least some evidence that
the `forbidden fruit' aspect of prohibition may lead to increased
use of or experimentation with drugs, particularly among the
young.~... The case for legalization does not rely on this
argument, but those who believe prohibition needs no defense
cannot simply dismiss it.;SPMquot; James Ostrowski, Thinking About
Drug Legalization, Cato Institute Policy Analysis No.~121,
May~25, 1989, at~1.<#593#>
- <#1833#>109<#1833#>
- <#594#>Letter
to the Editor, Just Say Yes, The Village Voice, Jan.~18,
1994, at~6 (submitted by Dr. John P. Morgan, Professor, City
University of New York Medical School).<#594#>
- <#1835#>110<#1835#>
- <#595#>Id.<#595#>
- <#1837#>111<#1837#>
- <#596#>Id.<#596#>
- <#1839#>112<#1839#>
- <#597#>Grinspoon Bakalar, supra note
27, at~358; see also Steve France, Should We
Fight or Switch?, 76 A.B.A.J. 42, 45 (1990).<#597#>
- <#1841#>113<#1841#>
- <#598#>Ethan
Nadelmann, Isn't it Time to Legalize Drugs?, The Boston
Sunday Globe, Oct.~2, 1988, at~A23; see also J. P. Morgan, D.
Riley G. B. Chesher, Cannabis: Legal Reform, Medicinal
Use and Harm Reduction, in Psychoactive Drugs and Harm
Reduction (Nick K. Heather ed., 1993) (reporting that
decriminalization, of small amounts of marijuana in Australian
state of South Australia in 1985 did not result in any change in
rates of marijuana use in South Australia; there were no
significant differences in rates of use between South Australia
and other Australian states which had not changed their laws
regarding marijuana).<#598#>
- <#1843#>114<#1843#>
- <#599#>See Nadelmann, supra note 113,
at~A23.<#599#>
- <#1845#>115<#1845#>
- <#600#>See Henk Jan van Vliet, The Uneasy
Decriminalization: A Perspective on Dutch Drug Policy, 18
Hofstra L. Rev. 717 (1990).<#600#>
- <#1847#>116<#1847#>
- <#601#>Nadelmann, supra note
113, at~A23.<#601#>
- <#1849#>117<#1849#>
- <#602#>But see Marlise Simons, Drug Floodgates
Open, Inundating the Dutch, N.Y. Times, Apr.~20, 1994, at~A4
(reporting that ``drug tourists'' from Germany, Belgium,
Luxembourg, and France flock to the Netherlands because of its
``permissive rules for soft drugs;SPMquot;).<#602#>
- <#1851#>118<#1851#>
- <#603#>Sidney Zion, Battle Lines in the War on
Drugs: Make Them Legal, N.Y. Times, Dec.~15, 1993, at~A27.<#603#>
- <#1853#>119<#1853#>
- <#604#>France,
supra note 112, at~45.<#604#>
- <#1855#>120<#1855#>
- <#605#>``[W]hat grounds are there for the
tacit assumption that if prohibition were lifted [drug]
consumption would increase so dramatically as to create a social
crisis? The citizens of the West do not customarily behave like
an unthinking bovine herd, ready to ingest anything placed before
them that is cheap and plentiful. After all, alcoholic
liquors---regarded by drug specialists as the most dangerous of
all drugs---are universally available. Yet the vast majority of
citizens are not addicts. Nor is there any expectation that they
ever will be.~... [M]ost people drink occasionally, or even
daily, but in moderation. Were the trade in cocaine to be
decriminalized, it is reasonable to expect that, after some
initial experimenting, the pattern would not be dissimilar to
that of alcohol.;SPMquot; E. J. Mishan, Narcotics: The Problem and
the Solution, 61 Pol. Quar. 441, 442--43 (1990).<#605#>
- <#1857#>121<#1857#>
- <#606#>Bureau of Justice Statistics, United States
Department of Justice, Drugs, Crime, and the Justice
System 26 (1992).<#606#>
- <#1859#>122<#1859#>
- <#607#>Nadelmann, supra note 113, at~A23.<#607#>
- <#1861#>123<#1861#>
- <#608#>Medical
Examiner Data, Table 4.02---Distribution of drug abuse deaths by
selected episode characteristics: 1988--1991, in Annual
Medical Examiner Data 1991, Data from the Drug Abuse Warning
Network, NIDA Statistical Series, Series I, Number 11-B,
page 50.<#608#>
- <#1863#>124<#1863#>
- <#281#>The drastic decline within the
past thirty years in use of tobacco, perhaps the most addictive
psychoactive substance of all, without resort to any criminal
sanctions, stands as the paramount example of the power of
social controls over patterns of use of psychoactive substances.<#281#>
- <#1865#>125<#1865#>
- <#609#>Grinspoon Bakalar, supra
note~27, at~359 n.27 (citing E. A. Nadelmann, Thinking
Seriously About Alternatives); see also John Horgan, A
Kinder War, Sci. Amer., July~1993, at~24 (citing Arnold S.
Trebach). Arnold S. Trebach is the president of The Drug Policy
Foundation, a non-profit group based in Washington, D.C. that
explores alternatives to the current drug policies and which
espouses an approach to ``the drug problem'' called ``harm
reduction.;SPMquot; The idea behind harm reduction is that drug abuse
whould be viewed, at worst, as a disease requiring treatment and
not an absolute evil that must be eradicated at all costs. ``The
essence is the acceptance of the enduring reality of drug use,
the absurdity of even attempting to create a drug-free society
and the need to treat drug users and abusers as basically decent
human beings.;SPMquot; Id.<#609#>
- <#1873#>126<#1873#>
- <#610#>See Don C. Des
Jarlais Samuel R. Friedman, AIDS and the Use of
Injected Drugs, Sci. Amer., Feb.~1994, at~82, 84; Don C. Des
Jarlais, Samuel R. Friedman, Jo L. Sotheran, John Wenston,
Michael Marmor, Stanley Yancovitz, Blanche Frank, Sara Beatrice
Donna Mildvan, Continuity and Change Within an HIV
Epidemic: Injecting Drug Users in New York City, 1984 through
1992, 271 JAMA 121--27 (1994).<#610#>
- <#1875#>127<#1875#>
- <#611#>Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Substance
Abuse: The Nations's Number One Health Problem 36--37 (1993)
[hereinafter Substance Abuse].<#611#>
- <#1877#>128<#1877#>
- <#612#>National
Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors,
Treatment Works 10--12 (1990) [hereinafter
Treatment Works].<#612#>
- <#1879#>129<#1879#>
- <#613#>See
New York Needle Exchanges Called Surprisingly Effective,
N.Y. Times, Feb.~18, 1993, at~A1, B4.<#613#>
- <#1881#>130<#1881#>
- <#614#>See People v. Bordowitz, 155 Misc. 2d 128, 588 N.Y.S.2d 507 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County 1991) (medical
necessity defense sustained where defendants handed out clean
hypodermic needles to drug addicts to prevent further spread of
HIV and AIDS infections).<#614#>
- <#1885#>131<#1885#>
- <#615#>See,
e.g., Richard B. Woodward Eugene Richards, Under
Their Skin, N.Y. Times Magazine, Dec.~5, 1993, at~58 (photo of
woman performing act of prostitution for money to buy drugs);
Sonia Nazario, Sex, Drugs and No Place To Go, Los Angeles
Times, Dec.~12, 1993, pt.~A, at~1, col.~1 (profiles of teenage
prostitutes selling their bodies for drugs).<#615#>
- <#1887#>132<#1887#>
- <#616#>See, e.g., Jonathan Eig,
Parental Addiction; Mother of Six Crack Babies Blames
Drugs, Prostitution, Dallas Morning News, Dec.~12, 1993, at~1A
(profile of mother who ``continues to sell her body for cocaine;SPMquot;
and does not consistently use condoms); Katherine Boo,
Unpretty Woman, Washington Post, Aug.~22, 1993, at~C1
(reporting risky behavior of ``crack whore;SPMquot;).<#616#>
- <#1889#>133<#1889#>
- <#617#>See Laurie Garrett,
Syphilis, Gonorrhea Cases Soar in U.S., Newsday, Sept.~19,
1990, at~2 (quoting Dr. Robert Rolfs).<#617#>
- <#1893#>134<#1893#>
- <#618#>See, e.g., Robert Lipsyte, Ladling
Out a Little Hope to the Hopeless, N.Y. Times, Oct.~24, 1993,
§~13, at~3 (describing various ills of addicted prostitutes);
Richard P. Usatine, L. Gelberg, M.H. Smith J. Lesser,
Health Care for the Homeless, 49 Amer. Family Physician
139 (1994) (describing studies of general health problems
associated with substance abuse).<#618#>
- <#1895#>135<#1895#>
- <#619#>See, e.g., Kathleen Neville, Assia
Bromberg, Ruven Bromberg, Stanley Bonk, Bruce A. Hanna William
N. Rom, The Third Epidemic---Multidrug-Resistant
Tuberculosis, 104 Chest 45 (1994) (multidrug-resistant TB
linked to intravenous drug abuse, homelessness, HIV infection);
Robert M. Morgenthau, Efforts Needed on Behalf of Our
Children, N.Y.L.J., Jan.~19, 1994, at~2 (noting connection of
injection drug use to drug-resistant TB, and consequent costs to
society).<#619#>
- <#1899#>136<#1899#>
- <#620#>See, e.g., Andrea Hamilton,
Supporters Say Needle Exchange Works, and Addicts Like
It, Associated Press, Feb.~28, 1994 (quoting doctors discussing
addicts' reasons for avoiding regular health care system).<#620#>
- <#1901#>137<#1901#>
- <#621#>See Substance Abuse, supra note~127,
at~38--39 (``[i]llicit drug users---particularly people using
cocaine or heroin---make more than 370,000 visits to costly
emergency rooms each year;SPMquot;); Joseph B. Treaster, U.S.
Reports Sharp Increase in Drug-Caused Emergencies, N.Y. Times,
Oct.~5, 1993, at~B11 (quoting federal officials reporting steep
rise in costly emergency room care for drug-related ills).<#621#>
- <#1903#>138<#1903#>
- <#622#>See, e.g., Philip J. Hilts,
Hospitals Sought Out Prenatal Drug Abuse, N.Y. Times,
Jan.~21, 1994, at~A12 (reporting that ``university hospital in
South Carolina has been accused of testing pregnant women for
drug use without their consent,;SPMquot; sharing the test results with
law enforcement authorities and threatening women with
prosecution if they refused to attend drug treatment program);
see also Gina Kolata, Racial Bias Seen on Pregnant
Addicts, N.Y. Times, July~20, 1990, at~A13 (``Most women
prosecuted for using illegal drugs while pregnant have been poor
members of racial minorities, experts say, even though drug use
in pregnancy is equally prevalent in middle-class women.;SPMquot;). The
drug distribution criminal cases against pregnant women are
somewhat ironic in view of the scientific evidence that nursing
women deliver natural opioids to their children in their human
milk. See Natalie Angier, Mother's Milk Found to Be Potent
Cocktail of Hormones, N.Y. Times, May~24, 1994, at~C1.<#622#>
- <#1905#>139<#1905#>
- <#623#>See Wendy Chavkin,
Drug Addiction and Pregnancy: Policy Crossroads, 80 Am. J.
Pub. Health 483 (1990); American Public Health Association,
Illicit Drug Use by Pregnant Women, 1990 Public Policy
Statement Adopted at 118th Annual Meeting, No.~9020 4--6 (1990);
State of New York Anti-Drug Abuse Council, Anti-Drug Abuse
Strategy Report 1990 Updates, 6, 33--37.<#623#>
- <#1911#>140<#1911#>
- <#624#>Des Jarlais
Friedman, supra note~126, at~85.<#624#>
- <#1913#>141<#1913#>
- <#625#>See, e.g.,
A Potent ``Designer'' Drug, N.Y. Times, Feb.~3, 1991,
at~30 (reporting on more than 150 deaths from overdoses of
different forms of synthetic heroin, devised ``[b]ecause laws
outlawing drugs are based on specific chemical formulas [and]
`designer drugs' are legal until they are broken down in
government laboratories and laws are rewritten to ban them.;SPMquot;);
Michael Hedges, DEA Nabs 2 For Making Ultralethal Drug
Fentanyl, Washington Times, Feb.~6, 1993, at~A4 (reporting
arrest of ``highly skilled'' manufacturers of drugs responsible
for many overdose deaths in the Northeast); Chapin Wright Peg
Tyre, Killer Drug's Toll Now 12, Newsday, Feb.~4, 1991,
at~3.<#625#>
- <#1915#>142<#1915#>
- <#626#>See James Ostrowski, The Moral and
Practical Case for Drug Legalization, 18 Hofstra L. Rev. 607,
652, 654 (1990) (``Because there is no quality control in the
black market, prohibition also kills by making drug use more
dangerous. Illegal drugs contain poisons, are of uncertain
potency, and are injected with dirty needles. Many deaths are
caused by infections, accidental overdoses, and poisoning.~... In summary, the attempt to protect users from themselves has
backfired, as it did during Prohibition. The drug laws have
succeeded only in making drug use much more dangerous by driving
it underground and out of reach of moderating social and medical
influences.;SPMquot;).<#626#>
- <#1917#>143<#1917#>
- <#627#>See Malcolm W. Browne,
Problems Loom In Effort to Control Use of Chemicals for
Illicit Drugs, N.Y. Times, Oct.~24, 1989, at~C1 (reporting
experts' belief that prohibition is futile because of ``seemingly
endless alternative methods of synthesizing drugs;SPMquot; and the
continuing development of ``new and ever more powerful drugs;SPMquot;).<#627#>
- <#1923#>144<#1923#>
- <#628#>See, e.g., Jane E. Brody, 17 States
in Vanguard of War on Smoking, N.Y. Times, Nov.~10, 1993,
at~C17 (reporting that new study by Dr. J. Michael McGinnis and
Dr. WIlliam H. Foege ranks top nine nongenetic causes of death
in the United States in 1990 with tobacco first (400,000 deaths
per yar), alcohol third (100,000 deaths per year), and illegal
use of drugs ninth (20,000 per year)). The federal government's
Food and Drug Administration has recently suggested that
cigarettes should be regulated as ``an addictive drug;SPMquot; because
tobacco companies ``manipulate the amount of nicotine in
cigarettes to maintain smokers' addictions.;SPMquot; Philip J. Hilts,
U.S. Agency Suggests Regulating Cigarettes as an Addictive
Drug, N.Y. Times, Feb.~26, 1994, at~A1.<#628#>
- <#1925#>145<#1925#>
- <#629#>See, e.g.,
Letter to the Editor, Marijuana vs. Alcohol for
Teenagers, N.Y. Times, June~30, 1992, at~22, col.~4 (New York
City police officer recalls ``when we cracked down on the beer
drinking [at rock concerts], marijuana smoke wafted overhead,
and the few problems we encountered were usually the result of
police officers arresting marijuana users;SPMquot;).<#629#>
- <#1927#>146<#1927#>
- <#630#>Peter
Passell, Economic Scene: Less Marijuana, More Alcohol,
N.Y. Times, June~17, 1992, at~D2.<#630#>
- <#1929#>147<#1929#>
- <#631#>Id.<#631#>
- <#1931#>148<#1931#>
- <#632#>Id.<#632#>
- <#1935#>149<#1935#>
- <#633#>As was written
about alcohol Prohibition (but equally applicable to today's
illegalization of drugs), ``[t]he underworlds of the larger
cities have been termendously strengthened by the manufacture
and distribution of intoxicating liquors. The immense profits
derived from this source have become the backbone of criminal
organizations in many of these cities.;SPMquot; Arthur V. Lashly,
The Professional Criminal and Organized Crime, A Report to
the Section of Criminal Law and Criminology of the ABA, 51st
Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, July~25--27, 1928 (Miscellaneous
Bar Phamphlet, Vol.~36, Library of the Association of the Bar of
the City of New York).<#633#>
- <#1937#>150<#1937#>
- <#634#>See, e.g., People v. Hernandez,
82 N.Y.2d 309, 604 N.Y.S.2d 524, 624 N.E.2d 661 (1993) (police
officer fatally shot in gunfight during drug raid); Scott Ladd,
Drug Gang ``Enforcer'' Arrested, Newsday, Mar.~30, 1994,
at~4 (reporting that drug gang routinely killed bystanders).<#634#>
- <#1939#>151<#1939#>
- <#635#>Rudolph Giuliani,
Control Guns Through Licensing, USA Today, Mar.~3, 1994,
at~13A.<#635#>
- <#1941#>152<#1941#>
- <#636#>See Randy T. Salekin Bruce K. Alexander,
Cocaine and Crime, in New Frontiers in Drug Policy
105, 111 (Arnold S. Trebach Kevin B. Zeese eds., 1991).<#636#>
- <#1943#>153<#1943#>
- <#637#>``Alcohol is the drug most
associated with many forms of violence, including domestic
violence.;SPMquot; American Bar Association, New Directions for
National Substance Abuse Policy 15 (1994); see also
Substance Abuse, supra note~127, at~34--35
(counting alcohol-related deaths from automobile accidents,
falls, fires and drowning); Steven B. Duke, To Reduce
Crime, Legalize Drugs, Chicago Tribune, Jan.~5, 1994, at~15
(tracing correlation of alcohol consumption and violent crime);
Steven Jonas, Solving the Drug Problem: A Public Health
Approach to the Reduction of the Use and Abuse of Both Legal and
Illegal Recreational Drugs, 18 Hofstra L. Rev., 751, 752--53
(1990) (``It happens that the negative health effects of
the two legal drugs are much more serious than those of the
currently illegal ones. For example, smoking kills about 400,000
persons per year, while alcohol is associated with 80,000 to
200,000 deaths per year. Together, on the other hand, the
currently illegal drugs were responsible for about six thousand
deaths in 1987.;SPMquot;) (emphasis in original) (footnotes omitted).<#637#>
- <#1947#>154<#1947#>
- <#638#>Even supporters
of the current prohibitionist laws have recognized that more
resources should be devoted to treatment. See Edward A. Adams,
ABA Urges Additional Funding for Drug Treatment,
N.Y.L.J., Feb.~4, 1994, at~1 (noting that ABA ``has called for
more federal funding for treatment of drug abusers, saying
education, prevention and rehabilitation should be `on a par
with law enforcement and interdiction efforts';SPMnbsp;;SPMquot;); see also
Joseph B. Treaster, New Focus on Drugs, N.Y. Times,
Feb.~12, 1994, at~7 (reporting Administration's introduction of
``a model drug treatment program;SPMquot;); Joseph B. Treaster,
President Plans to Raise Drug Treatment Budget, N.Y.
Times, Feb.~8, 1994, at~B9 (reporting that Administration has
budgeted $5.4 billon for drug prevention and treatment); Joseph
B. Treaster, More Arrests, More Therapy in Drug Plan,
N.Y. Times, Jan.~27, 1994, at~B1.<#638#>
- <#1949#>155<#1949#>
- <#639#>American
Bar Association, New Directions for National Substance
Abuse Policy 19 (1994).<#639#>
- <#1955#>156<#1955#>
- <#373#>It must be remembered that forty million
Americans are estimated to use drugs but only four to six million
of these are considered to be addicts or abusers for whom usage
of all types of drugs (licit and illicit) is beyond their
control. It is these drug abusers to whom treatment must be fully
available.<#373#>
- <#1957#>157<#1957#>
- <#640#>Treatment of Drug
Dependence: What Works, International Review of Psychiatry 81
(1989).<#640#>
- <#1959#>158<#1959#>
- <#641#>There is, however, at least one experimental
therapy that may provide a ``magic bullet;SPMquot; to cure addiction for
extended periods. Ibogaine, a hallucinogenic drug that is now
prohibited, has shown a remarkable ability to break a user's
drug addiction to heroin, cocaine, and other drugs after a
single administration. See Spencer Rumsey, Addiction
Obsession, Newsday, Nov.~19, 1992, at~72; Sandra Blakeslee,
A Bizarre Drug Tested in the Hope of Helping Drug
Addicts, N.Y. Times, Oct.~27, 1993, at~C11; Dolores King,
Hallucinogen Being Studied as Treatment for Addiction,
The Boston Globe, Nov.~9, 1992, at~29.<#641#>
- <#1961#>159<#1961#>
- <#642#>See Mathea
Falco, The Making of a Drug-Free America 108--09 (1992);
Substance Abuse, supra note~127, at~28--29
(reviewing relapse among smokers, drinkers, and users of illicit
drugs).<#642#>
- <#1965#>160<#1965#>
- <#643#>See Falco, supra note~159, at~116--19.<#643#>
- <#1969#>161<#1969#>
- <#644#>See Falco, supra note~159,
at~119--25 (descriptions of Phoenix House in New York and Amity,
a therapeutic community in Phoenix, Arizona).<#644#>
- <#1971#>162<#1971#>
- <#645#>Falco,
supra note~159, at~120; see also Douglas Anglin
Yih-Ing Hser, Treatment of Drug Abuse, in Drugs and
Crime 393--460 (Michael Tonry James Q. Wilson eds., 1990).<#645#>
- <#1973#>163<#1973#>
- <#646#>Robert L. Hubbard, Mary Ellen Marsden, J. Valley
Rachal, Henrick J. Harwood, Elizabeth R. Cavanaugh Harold M.
Ginzburg, Drug Abuse Treatment, A National Study of
Effectiveness 102 (1989) [hereinafter Drug Abuse
Treatment]; Treatment Works, supra note~128,
at~17.<#646#>
- <#1977#>164<#1977#>
- <#647#>See, e.g., Sylvia Nasar Alison Leigh
Cowan, A Wall St. Star's Agonizing Confession, N.Y.
Times, Apr.~3, 1994, §~3, at~1 (investment banker and former
Reagan administration official Lawrence Kudlow); Peter J. Boyer,
The Ogre's Tale, The New Yorker, Apr.~4, 1994, at~36
(Senator Bob Packwood); Carol Emert, Alcoholism Among the
Elderly Discussed on Capitol Hill, States News Service, Feb.~7,
1992 (Reagan White House Deputy Chief of Staff Michael Deaver
``credits his sobriety during the last six years to a stay at
Ashley House;SPMquot;); Alison Bass, Substance Abuse Centers Wither
in Changing Times, Boston Globe, Oct.~31, 1993, Metro sec., at~1
(Kitty Dukakis); Ronald Blum, Sports News, Associated
Press, Jan.~29, 1994 (Mickey Mantle, Elizabeth Taylor, Liza
Minelli, Betty Ford).<#647#>
- <#1981#>165<#1981#>
- <#648#>See Falco, supra note~159,
at~126--27.<#648#>
- <#1983#>166<#1983#>
- <#649#>Drug Abuse Treatment, supra note
~163, at~103, 180.<#649#>
- <#1985#>167<#1985#>
- <#650#>J.C.
Ball, W.R. Lange, C.P. Meyers S.R. Friedman, Reducing
the Risk of AIDS Through Methadone Maintenance Treatment, 29
Journal of Health and Social Behavior 214--26 (1988).<#650#>
- <#1987#>168<#1987#>
- <#651#>Treatment Works,
supra note~128, at~17.<#651#>
- <#1991#>169<#1991#>
- <#652#>Most studies have
investigated its effect on alcoholism. See M.L. Bullock, P.D.
Culliton R.T. Olander, Controlled Trial of Acupuncture
for Severe Recidivist Alcoholism, The Lancet, June~24, 1989,
at~1434--39; M. Smith K. Ra, Use of Acupuncture in the
Treatment and Prevention of Alcohol Abuse, 23 Alcoholism 25--31.<#652#>
- <#1993#>170<#1993#>
- <#653#>Falco, supra note~159, at 112--17.<#653#>
- <#1995#>171<#1995#>
- <#654#>Treatment Works, supra note 128,
at 17.<#654#>
- <#1997#>172<#1997#>
- <#655#>Id. at 15.<#655#>
- <#2001#>173<#2001#>
- <#656#>See Drug Abuse Treatment, supra
note~163, at~179--84 (tables showing success rates for
therapeutic communities, outpatient methadone and outpatient
drug-free programs).<#656#>
- <#2005#>174<#2005#>
- <#657#>The results of the study were published in
Drug Abuse Treatment, supra note~163.<#657#>
- <#2007#>175<#2007#>
- <#658#>Ball, Lange, Meyers Friedman, supra
note~167, at~214, 218.<#658#>
- <#2009#>176<#2009#>
- <#659#>Treatment Works,
supra note 128, at 17.<#659#>
- <#2011#>177<#2011#>
- <#660#>Id. at 18; see also National Institute on
Drug Abuse, Effectiveness of Drug Abuse Treatment
(Jan.~20, 1988) [hereinafter Effectiveness of Drug Abuse
Treatment]; Office of Technology Assessment, The
Effectiveness of Drug Abuse Treatment: Implications for
Controlling AIDS/HIV Infection, Background Paper No.~6, 56--77
(Sept.~1990).<#660#>
- <#2013#>178<#2013#>
- <#661#>Drug Abuse Treatment,
supra note 163, at 163.<#661#>
- <#2015#>179<#2015#>
- <#662#>See Falco, supra note
159, at 110.<#662#>
- <#2019#>180<#2019#>
- <#663#>Effectiveness of Drug Abuse Treatment,
supra note 177.<#663#>
- <#2021#>181<#2021#>
- <#664#>Drug
Abuse Treatment, supra note 163, at 128--29, 181.<#664#>
- <#2023#>182<#2023#>
- <#665#>Treatment Works,
supra note 128, at 17--18.<#665#>
- <#2025#>183<#2025#>
- <#666#>Id.<#666#>
- <#2027#>184<#2027#>
- <#667#>Drug
Abuse Treatment, supra note 163, at 137--37.<#667#>
- <#2029#>185<#2029#>
- <#668#>See
generally Victor Tabbush, The Effectiveness and Efficiency
of Publicly Funded Drug Abuse Treatment and Prevention Programs
in California: A Benefit-Cost Analysis (Mar.~1986).<#668#>
- <#2031#>186<#2031#>
- <#669#>One study of ten hospitals in
upstate New York found that forty-four percent of the emergency
room patients evaluated for psychiatric problems showed evidence
of current substance use. M.E. Evans R.J. Martin,
Description of Clients Using Psychiatric Emergency Room
Services, New York State Office of Mental Health, Bureau of
Evaluation and Research Services (1989).<#669#>
- <#2033#>187<#2033#>
- <#670#>State of New York Anti-Drug Abuse
Council, Anti-Drug Abuse Strategy Report 1990 Update,
at~29 (data from Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative
System from all general hospitals in New York State).<#670#>
- <#2035#>188<#2035#>
- <#671#>According to the American Hospital
Association, 1989 the average cost per day, per room in a
hospital in the United States was $637. The Association expected
that figure to rise by 35 to 40 by 1992. Suzanne Gordon,
Hospices and the High Cost of Dying, Chicago Tribune,
Dec.~19, 1992, Zone N, at~23.<#671#>
- <#2037#>189<#2037#>
- <#672#>State of New York
Anti-Drug Abuse Council, Anti-Drug Abuse Strategy Report
1990 Update, at~5--6, 36--37.<#672#>
- <#2039#>190<#2039#>
- <#673#>Id.; see also
Treatment Works, supra note 128, at 23--24.<#673#>
- <#2041#>191<#2041#>
- <#674#>Francis X. Clines,
Dealing With Drug Dealers: Rehabilitation, Not Jail, N.Y.
Times, Jan.~20, 1993, at~B2; Legal action Center, Moving
in the Right Direction: New York State's Fight Against
Alcoholism and Drug Addiction (Nov.~1, 1991).<#674#>
- <#2045#>192<#2045#>
- <#453#>To be effective, of course, such education
programs must be credible and non-propagandistic.<#453#>
- <#2047#>193<#2047#>
- <#675#>Even the United States Department of
Health and Human Services recognizes that the effectiveness of
many school-based prevention programs remains untested. See
Promoting Health Development Through School-Based
Prevention: New Approaches, in United States Department of
Health and Human Services, Preventing Adolescent Drug Use:
From Theory to Practice, OSAP Prevention Monograph-8, DHHS
Pub.~No. (ADM) 91-1725 (1991) [hereinafter OSAP Monograph-8].<#675#>
- <#2049#>194<#2049#>
- <#676#>Falco suggests that school systems are too
willing to implement programs like DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance
Education) which limit the need to use school resources and are
easier to implement because they bring in outsiders like police
officers to lecture on prevention. These programs have not proven
effective in reducing tobacco, alcohol, or drug use. Falco,
supra note~159, at~43.<#676#>
- <#2055#>195<#2055#>
- <#677#>Falco,
supra note 159, at 41.<#677#>
- <#2061#>196<#2061#>
- <#678#>Falco, supra note 159, at 56.<#678#>
- <#2065#>197<#2065#>
- <#679#>Id. at 59--60, 63--64.<#679#>
- <#2069#>198<#2069#>
- <#680#>Id. at 64. A
discussion of the SSDP project is also contained in the OSAP
Monograph-8, supra note~193, at~147--152. There the
authors report that the program resulted in more positive
attitudes towards teachers and family and improved academic
development.<#680#>
- <#2074#>199<#2074#>
- <#681#>Stephen Labaton,
Surgeon General Suggests Study of Legalizing Drugs, N.Y.
Times, Dec.~8, 1993, at~A23.<#681#>
- <#2076#>200<#2076#>
- <#682#>See James Ostrowski, The
Moral and Practical Case for Drug Legalization, 18 Hofstra L.
Rev. 607, 647 (1990) (``The repeal of alcohol prohibition
provides the appropriate analogy. Repeal did not end
alcoholism---as indeed Prohibition did not---but it did solve
many of the problems created by Prohibition, such as corruption,
murder, and poisoned alcohol.;SPMquot;).<#682#>
- <#2078#>201<#2078#>
- <#683#>At
least one state in Germany appears to have adopted a policy like
this. See Stephen Kinzer, German State Eases Its Policy on
Drug Arrests, N.Y. Times, May~18, 1994, at~A5 (reporting that
officials in Germany's most populous state, North
Rhine-Westphalia, ``say the police there will no longer arrest
people for possessing small amounts of any drug, including
cocaine, heroin, morphine, amphetamine pills or LSD;SPMquot;).<#683#>
- <#2080#>202<#2080#>
- <#684#>See Matthew L. Wald,
Learning to Screen Drugged Drivers on Nassau Roads, N.Y.
Times, Dec.~5, 1993, at~49 (reporting that at federal
government's urging, police are being trained ``in a rigorous,
standardized program of learning to spot and analyze drug abuse;SPMquot;
so as to catch drugged drivers.<#684#>
- <#2082#>203<#2082#>
- <#475#>N.Y. Penal Law §~15.25 (McKinney
1987).<#475#>