Simtel MSDOS 1992 June

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ Simtel MSDOS 1992 June / SIMTEL_0692.cdr / msdos / educatin / csa.arc / CSA_GEN.TXT < prev next >

Wrap

Text File | 1987-04-08 | 35KB | 845 lines

form: (1 A A A) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A A I) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing a universal conclusion from a particular premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A I I) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 A O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E A E) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E A O) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing a universal conclusion from a particular premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E I O) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 E O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 I O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (1 O O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A E E) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A E O) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing a universal conclusion from a particular premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 A O O) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E A E) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E A O) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing a universal conclusion from a particular premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E I O) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 E O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 I O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (2 O O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A A I) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A I I) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 A O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E A E) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E A O) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing a universal conclusion from a particular premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E I O) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 E O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I A I) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 I O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing a universal conclusion from a particular premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O A O) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (3 O O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A A I) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A A O) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A E O) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 A O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E A E) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E A O) this syllogism commits the existential fallacy under boolean interpretation under aristotelean interpretation, this syllogism is valid ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing a universal conclusion from a particular premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E I O) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 E O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I A I) This is a valid syllogism under both boolean and aristotelean interpretation ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit minor term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 I O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of an undistributed middle term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O A A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O A E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O A I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O A O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O E A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O E E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O E I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O E O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O I A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O I E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O I I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premiss ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O I O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O O A) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O O E) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O O I) this syllogism commits the fallacy of exclusive premisses ---------------------------------------------- form: (4 O O O) this syllogism commits the fallacy of illicit major term ---------------------------------------------- 25 valid