home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Simtel MSDOS 1992 June
/
SIMTEL_0692.cdr
/
msdos
/
prodigy
/
prodigy.wrn
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1990-11-23
|
5KB
|
84 lines
VNS TECHNOLOGY WATCH: [Mike Taylor, VNS Correspondent]
===================== [Nashua, NH, USA ]
Conversations with Fred
Middlesex News, Framingham, 11/6/90.
via BITNET Computer Underground Digest
The story is bizarre but true, swears Herb Rothman. Seems Prodigy,
the network run as a joint venture by Sears and IBM, wouldn't let
somebody post a message in a coin-collecting forum that he was
looking for a particular Roosevelt dime for his collection. Upset,
the man called "member services." The representative told him the
message violated a Prodigy rule against mentioning another user in a
public message. "What user?" the man asked. "Roosevelt Dime," the
rep replied. "That's not a person!" the man said. "Yes he is, he's a
halfback for the Chicago Bears," the rep shot back.
Rothman is one of those alleged compu-terrorists Prodigy claims is
harassing other users and companies that advertise on the service by
sending out thousands upon thousands of increasingly hostile
messages in protest of a Prodigy plan to begin charging users who
send more than 30 e-mail messages a month. Rothman and the others
say they sent very polite messages to people (Penny Hay of Los
Angeles says her messages were even approved by the Prodigy legal
department) telling them about the new fees and urging them to
protest.
What's really happening is that Prodigy is proving its complete
arrogance and total lack of understanding of the dynamics of on-line
communication. They just don't get it. People are NOT going to spend
nearly $130 a year just to see the weather in Oregon or order trips
to Hawaii.
Even the computerphobes Prodigy wants to attract quickly learn the
real value of the service is in finding new friends and holding
intelligent "discussions" with others across the country.
But Prodigy blithely goes on censoring everything meant for public
consumption, unlike other nationwide services (or even
bulletin-board systems run out of some teenager's bedroom).
Rothman's story is not the only one about capricious or just plain
stupid censoring. Dog fanciers can't use the word "bitch" when
talking about their pets, yet the service recently ran an advice
column all about oral sex.
So when the supposed technology illiterates Prodigy thinks make up
its user base managed to get around this through the creation of
private mail "lists" (and, in fact, many did so at the urging of
Prodigy itself!), Prodigy started complaining of "e-mail hogs,"
quietly announced plans to levy charges for more than a minute
number of e-mail messages each month and finally, simply canceled
the accounts of those who protested the loudest!
And now we are watching history in the making, with the nation's
first nationwide protest movement organized almost entirely by
electronic mail (now don't tell Prodigy this, but all those people
they kicked off quickly got back onto the system -- Prodogy allows
up to six users per household account, and friends simply loaned
their empty slots to the protest leaders).
It's truly amazing how little faith Prodigy has in the ability of
users to behave themselves. Other systems have "sysops" to keep
things in line, but rarely do they have to pull messages. Plus,
Prodigy is just being plain dumb. Rothman now has a mailing list of
about 1,500. That means every time he sends out one of his
newsletters on collectibles, he sends 1,500 e-mail messages, which,
yes, costs more for Prodigy to send over long-distance lines and
store in its central computers. But if they realized their users are
generally mature, rather than treating them as 4-year-olds, Rothman
could post just one message in a public area, that everybody could
see.
Is this any way to run an on-line system? Does Prodigy really want
to drive away the people most inclined to use the service -- and see
all those ads that pop up at the bottom of the screen? Prodigy may
soon have to do some accounting to the folks at IBM and Sears, who
by most accounts have already poured at least $750 million into
"this thing."
{Contributed by Wes Plouff}
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=