Internet Info 1997 December

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ Internet Info 1997 December / Internet_Info_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1997.iso / protocols / mstd-1781-tests.doc < prev next >

Wrap

Text File | 1991-07-11 | 71.8 KB | 1,822 lines

[ PROTOCOLS:MSTD-1781-TESTS.DOC ] [ 4/88 ] 12 March 1987 -1- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 DCA PROTOCOL LABORATORY SIMPLE MAIL TRANSFER PROTOCOL (SMTP) MIL-STD-1781 TRACEABILITY MATRIX This Traceability Matrix provides information on the derivation, organization, and function of tests specified for Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) within the Defense Communications Agency (DCA) Protocol Laboratory. This document is divided into five sections: SMTP TRACEABILITY INDEX; SMTP TESTS INDEX; SMTP TEST SCENARIOS INDEX; SMTP SCENARIO AND TEST DESCRIPTIONS. SMTP TRACEABILITY INDEX: MIL-STD-1781 References vs. SMTP TEST NUMBERS This table cross-references applicable sections in MIL-STD-1781 with the SMTP Test Number regarding each required command, option, or procedure. SMTP TESTS INDEX: SMTP TEST NUMBERS vs. SMTP COMMANDS/OPTIONS/PROCEDURES This table shows the SMTP Test Numbers that may be regarded as the principle tests of each SMTP command, option, or procedure. SMTP TEST SCENARIOS INDEX: SMTP TEST SCENARIO FILES vs. SMTP TEST NUMBERS For SMTP, there is almost a one-to-one correspondence between SMTP Test Numbers and SMTP Scenarios. Therefore, the relationship between scenarios and tests is not described in detail. The table shows, for each SMTP Test Number, the UNIX filename of the SMTP Test Scenario files in which it is a test. SMTP SCENARIO AND TEST DESCRIPTIONS This section provides a description of each SMTP test objective and an operational description of each test's verification procedure. 12 March 1987 -2- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 SMTP TRACEABILITY INDEX: MIL-STD-1781 References vs. SMTP TEST NUMBERS The following table cross-references applicable sections in MIL STD-1781 with the SMTP Test Number regarding each required command, option, or procedure. The SMTP Specifications 6.1.1.1 HELO command 3, 22 6.1.1.2 MAIL command 1, 2 6.1.1.3 RCPT command 4, 47, 31, 32 6.1.1.4 DATA command all 6.1.1.4.1 Response and further action all 6.1.1.5 SEND command 5, 6, 11 6.1.1.6 SOML command 7, 8 6.1.1.7 SAML command 9, 10 6.1.1.8 RSET command 12, 13, 14, 15 6.1.1.9 VRFY command 16, 17 6.1.1.10 EXPN command 18, 19 6.1.1.11 HELP command 20, 21 6.1.1.12 NOOP command 23, 24 6.1.1.13 QUIT command all 6.1.1.14 TURN command 25 6.1.2 Restrictions on command order 26, all 6.1.3 Command syntax 27, 28,29, all 6.1.3.2 SMTP syntax see the following 6.1.3.2.1 Numeric hostnames 30 6.1.3.3 Timestamp and return path lines 35, 38 6.2 SMTP replies see the following 6.2.1 Reply codes by function groups see 6.2.2 6.2.2 Numeric order list of reply codes see the following 6.2.2.a Reply code 211 20, 21 6.2.2.b Reply code 214 20, 21 6.2.2.c Reply code 220 all 6.2.2.d Reply code 221 all 6.2.2.e Reply code 250 all 6.2.2.f Reply code 251 all 6.2.2.g Reply code 354 all 6.2.2.h Reply code 421 all 6.2.2.i Reply code 450 all 6.2.2.j Reply code 451 all 6.2.2.k Reply code 452 all 6.2.2.1 Reply code 500 all 6.2.2.m Reply code 501 all 6.2.2.n Reply code 502 1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 19, 20, 21, 25 6.2.2.o Reply code 503 all 12 March 1987 -3- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 6.2.2.p Reply code 504 all 6.2.2.q Reply code 550 all 6.2.2.r Reply code 551 all 6.2.2.s Reply code 552 all 6.2.2.t Reply code 553 all 6.2.2.u Reply code 554 all 6.3 Sequencing of commands and replies 26 6.3.1 Command-reply sequences 39, all 6.5.1 Minimum implementation 1, 2, 3, 4, 22, 23 6.5.2 Transparency 40 6.5.2.1 ASCII characters 44, 45 6.5.3 Sizes see the following 6.5.3.a User Name 42 6.5.3.b Domain Name 30 6.5.3.c Path Name 36 6.5.3.d Command Line 41 6.5.3.e Reply Line 43 6.5.3.f Text Line 42 6.5.3.g Recipients Buffer 50 The SMTP Procedures 5.2 Mail 1, 2, 3, 26 5.3 Forwarding 4, 31, 32, 33, 34, 47 5.4 Verifying and expanding 16, 17, 18, 19 5.5 Sending and mailing 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 46, 47 5.6 Opening and closing all 5.7 Relaying 4, 31, 32, 33, 34, 47 5.7.3 Prevention of loops in error 36 reporting 5.7.4 Undeliverable mail notification 37 5.8 Domains 30 5.9 Changing roles 25 5.9.1 Refusal to change roles 25 12 March 1987 -4- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 SMTP TESTS INDEX: SMTP TEST NUMBERS vs. SMTP COMMANDS/OPTIONS/PROCEDURES The following table shows the SMTP Test Numbers regarded as the principle tests of each SMTP command, option, or procedure. (R) - SMTP-Receiver test (S) - SMTP-Sender test SMTP Test Number Test Purpose 01 (R) Correct function of mail transaction commands (HELO, MAIL, RCPT, DATA, QUIT) 02 (S) Correct function of mail transaction commands (HELO, MAIL, RCPT, DATA, QUIT) 03 (R) Correct function of multiple HELO commands 04 (R) Correct function of multiple RCPT commands 05 (R) Correct function of SEND command 06 (R) Capability to process incorrect SEND command 07 (R) Correct function of SOML command 08 (S) Correct function of SOML command 09 (R) Correct function of SAML command 10 (S) Correct function of SAML command 11 (S) Correct function of SEND command 12 (R) Correct function of RSET command 13 (R) Correct function of RSET command after RCPT 14 (R) Correct function of RSET command after SOML 15 (R) Correct function of RSET command after SAML 16 (R) Correct function of VRFY command 17 (R) Correct function of VRFY command 18 (R) Correct function of EXPN command 19 (R) Correct function of EXPN command 20 (R) Correct function of HELP command 21 (R) Correct function of HELP command 22 (R) Correct function of NOOP command during a transaction 23 (R) Correct function of NOOP command during a transaction 24 (R) Correct function of NOOP command during a transaction 25 (R) Correct function of TURN command 26 (R) Capability to process incorrect command sequence 27 (R) Capability to process incorrect command syntax 28 (R) Capability to process incorrect command syntax 29 (S) Capability to process incorrect command syntax 30 (R) Capability to correctly process hostnames 31 (R) Capability to correctly process relay mail messages 32 (R) Capability to correctly process multiple mail messages 33 (R) Capability to correctly process relay mail through more than two hosts 34 (R) Capability to correctly process incorrect relay mail messages 35 (R) Capability to correctly process reverse pathnames 36 (R) Capability to correctly process null reverse pathnames 12 March 1987 -5- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 37 (R) Capability to correctly process undeliverable mail 38 (R) Capability to correctly process timestamps 39 (S) Capability to correctly process incorrect command replies 40 (R) Capability to correctly process transparency 41 (R) Capability to correctly process excessive command length 42 (R) Capability to correctly process excessive text length 43 (S) Capability to correctly process excessive data length 44 (R) Capability to correctly process all ASCII characters 45 (S) Capability to correctly process all ASCII characters 46 (R) Capability to correctly process simultaneous SMTP transactions 12 March 1987 -6- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 SMTP TEST SCENARIOS INDEX: SMTP TEST SCENARIO FILES vs. SMTP TEST NUMBERS The following table shows, for each SMTP Test Number, the UNIX filename of the SMTP Test Scenario files in which it is a test. (r) - SMTP-Receiver test (s) - SMTP-Sender test TEST NUMBER UNIX FILENAME 01 r_basic 02 s_basic 03 r_helomulti 04 r_multircpt 05 r_send 06 r_sendbad 07 r_soml 08 s_soml 09 r_saml 10 s_saml 11 s_send 12 r_rset 13 r_rsetrcpt 14 r_rsetsoml 15 r_rsetsaml 16 r_vrfy 17 r_vrfy 18 r_expn 19 r_expn 20 r_help 21 r_help 22 r_nooptrans 23 r_nooptrans 24 r_nooptrans 25 r_turn 26 r_seqbad 27 r_badsyntax 28 r_badsyntax 29 s_syntaxbad 30 r_hostnames 31 r_relay 32 r_relaymult 33 r_relay3 34 r_relaybad 35 r_revpath 36 r_nullrevpath 37 r_undeliver 38 r_timestamp 39 s_replybad 40 r_transpar 41 r_longcmd 42 r_longtext 43 s_longline 44 r_ascii 45 s_ascii 46 r_multismtp 12 March 1987 -7- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 SMTP TEST AND SCENARIO DESCRIPTIONS This section provides a description of each SMTP Scenario objective and an operational description of each test's verification procedure. Scenario r_basic Scenario r_basic is the first scenario of an SMTP test session. This scenario tests the Receiver-SMTP Implementation Under Test (IUT) for basic mail reception and the compliance of the IUT Remote Driver (RD) to the DCA Protocol Laboratory SMTP Remote Driver Specification. If the IUT and the RD do not produce good results on the first run of this test scenario, then further testing should be abandoned until the problems are corrected. In scenario r_basic the Central Driver (CD) commands the Laboratory Driver (LD) to mail a message to the IUT. The CD then verifies the receipt of the message by commanding the RD to read the IUT's mail queue and send the results back to the CD using the RD spool command. The CD verifies that the correct command responses and mail message were received. TEST 1: BASIC MAIL RECEPTION (RECEIVER-SMTP) Does the IUT correctly receive a mail message and store it in its mail queue? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD conducts a basic mail transaction (HELO, MAIL, RCPT, DATA, QUIT) sending a message containing a unique message identification number. The RD reads the IUT mail queue and sends back the mail message to the CD in a Test Scenario Language (TSL) data packet. VERIFICATION: The CD searches the contents of the TSL data packet for the correct command replies and message identification (id) number. SUCCESS: The correct command replies and message id are found. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Incorrect command replies received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario s_basic Scenario s_basic tests the Sender-SMTP IUT for basic mail transmission capability. If the Sender-SMTP IUT and RD do not produce good results on the first run of this test scenario, then further testing should be abandoned until the problems are corrected. 12 March 1987 -8- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 In scenario s_basic the CD commands the RD to place a mail message with a known message identification number on the IUT's queue. The mail message is addressed to the Reference Receiver SMTP at the Protocol Laboratory. The Sender-SMTP IUT should start a mail transaction and send the message. The CD confirms the receipt of the message by reading the laboratory mail queue. The CD verifies that the correct mail message was received by searching for the known message identification number. TEST 2: BASIC MAIL TRANSMISSION (SENDER-SMTP) Does the IUT Sender-SMTP correctly format and transmit a mail message? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the RD to place a mail message with a unique id number on the IUT mail queue. The Sender-SMTP IUT should find the message in the queue and start a mail transaction. The mail message is sent to the Reference Receiver-SMTP. The Reference places the message on the Lab mail queue. The CD commands the LD to spool the mail message. The LD passes the mail message, including the id number, to the CD in a TSL data packet. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command sequences and the correct message id number. SUCCESS: The correct command sequences and message id are found. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command sequences are incorrect; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_helomulti Scenario r_helomulti tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process multiple HELO commands after the start of a mail transaction. TEST 3: MULTIPLE HELO COMMANDS DURING TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process multiple HELO commands after the start of a mail transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. Multiple HELO commands are issued, followed by a QUIT command. 12 March 1987 -9- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for each HELO command. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command replies of 500, 501, 504, or 421; Command replies other than those listed above; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses. Scenario r_multircpt Scenario r_multircpt tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to process multiple RCPT commands during a mail transaction. TEST 4: MULTIPLE RCPT COMMANDS DURING A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process multiple recipients? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD first sends the HELO and MAIL commands. Then the CD sends multiple RCPT commands. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. The CD also checks the mail queue for multiple mail messages. All messages should be received with the correct message id number. SUCCESS: CD receives a command reply of 250 or 251, and all messages are received with the correct message id. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command error reply of 500, 501, 503, 421 received; Command failure reply of 550, 551, 552 553 450 451, or 452 received; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; A message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_send Scenario r_send tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to process the SEND command. The CD commands the LD to send a mail message with a known identification number to the destination IUT's terminal screen (not to a mailbox). The tester must verify the correct receipt of the message by manually checking the terminal screen. 12 March 1987 -10- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 TEST 5: SEND COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the SEND command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the LD to issue the SEND command with a known message identification number. The message is displayed on the destination terminal screen. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply and receives manual verification of correct message receipt at destination terminal. Also, no mail message should have been spooled onto IUT mail queue. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250, a manual verification of message receipt, and no mail message is found on IUT mail queue. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command failure reply of 552, 451, or 452; Command error reply of 500, 501, 502, or 421; Mail message found on IUT mail queue; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_sendbad Scenario r_sendbad tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to process the SEND command with an undeliverable destination address. If the IUT offers SEND service, then the CD commands the LD to send a mail message to the IUT. The message will always be undeliverable since the message will be addressed to a test user who would not be logged on. Therefore, the IUT should notify the CD of an undeliverable message. TEST 6: SEND COMMAND WITH AN UNDELIVERABLE ADDRESS Does the IUT correctly process undeliverable mail using the SEND command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the LD to send a mail message to a nonexistent user. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct error reply to the RCPT command (the RCPT command is used in conjunction with the SEND command). SUCCESS: The CD receives an error reply of 550 or 421. 12 March 1987 -11- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command success reply of 250, or 251 received; Command error reply of 500, 501, or 503 received; Command failure reply of 551, 552, 553, 450, 451, or 452; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_soml Scenario r_soml tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to process the SOML command. The CD commands the LD to send or mail a mail message with a known identification number to the destination IUT's terminal screen or mailbox. If the message does not get placed onto the IUT mail queue, then the tester must verify the correct receipt of the message by manually checking the terminal screen. TEST 7: SOML COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION (RECEIVER-SMTP) Does the Receiver-SMTP IUT correctly process the SOML command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the LD to issue the SOML command with a known message identification number. The message is either displayed on the destination terminal screen or placed onto the IUT mail queue, but not both. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply and, if the message was not placed onto the IUT mail queue, receives manual verification of correct message receipt at destination terminal. Also, no mail message should have been placed onto the IUT mail queue if the message was displayed at the destination terminal. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250, a manual verification of message receipt at destination terminal, and no mail message is found on IUT mail queue; or, a 250 reply with no message received at the destination terminal, but a correct message placed onto the IUT mail queue. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command failure reply of 552, 451, or 452; Command error reply of 500, 501, 502, or 421; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -12- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario s_soml Scenario s_soml tests the Server-SMTP IUT capability to process the SOML command. The CD commands the RD to queue a mail message with a known identification number. The IUT should find the message in the queue and send or mail the message to the destination terminal screen or mailbox. If the message does not get placed onto the laboratory mail queue, then the lab tester must verify the correct receipt of the message by manually checking the destination terminal screen. The destination is the tsl mailbox or terminal. TEST 8: SOML COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION (SENDER-SMTP) Does the Sender-SMTP IUT correctly process the SOML command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the RD. The CD commands the RD to queue a mail message with a known identification number. The IUT should find the message in the queue and send or mail the message to the laboratory destination terminal screen or mailbox. The destination is the tsl mailbox or terminal. If the message does not get placed onto the laboratory mail queue, then the lab tester must verify the correct receipt of the message by manually checking the destination terminal screen. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct message identification number in the laboratory mail queue. If the message was not placed onto the mail queue, then manual verification of correct message receipt at destination terminal is performed by lab tester. Also, no mail message should have been placed onto the mail queue if the message was displayed at the destination terminal. SUCCESS: The CD finds the correct message identification number in the mail queue and no message appears at the destination terminal. Or, the message appears at the destination terminal and no message is found in the mail queue. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Message does not appear in either the destination mail queue or at the destination terminal, or appears at both; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -13- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario r_saml Scenario r_saml tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to process the SAML command. The CD commands the LD to send and mail a mail message with a known identification number to the destination IUT's terminal screen and mailbox. The remote tester must verify the correct receipt of the message by manually checking the terminal screen. The CD determines whether the mail message was correctly placed on the IUT mail queue. TEST 9: SAML COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION (RECEIVER-SMTP) Does the Receiver-SMTP IUT correctly process the SAML command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the LD to issue the SAML command with a known message identification number. The message is displayed on the destination terminal screen and placed onto the IUT mail queue. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply and receives manual verification of correct message receipt at the destination terminal. The mail message should have been placed onto the IUT mail queue and the message displayed at the destination terminal. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250, a manual verification of correct message receipt at destination terminal, and the mail message is found on the IUT mail queue. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command failure reply of 552, 451, or 452; Command error reply of 500, 501, 502, or 421; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario s_saml Scenario s_saml tests the Server-SMTP IUT capability to process the SAML command. The CD commands the RD to queue a mail message with a known identification number. The IUT should find the message in the queue and send and mail the message to the destination terminal screen and mailbox. The destination is the tsl mailbox or terminal at the laboratory. The CD determines whether the mail message was correctly placed on the laboratory mail queue. The lab tester verifies the correct receipt of the message at the destination terminal by manually checking the destination terminal screen. 12 March 1987 -14- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 TEST 10: SAML COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION (SENDER-SMTP) Does the Sender-SMTP IUT correctly process the SAML command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the RD. The CD commands the RD to queue a mail message with a known identification number. The IUT should find the message in the queue and send and mail the message to the laboratory destination terminal screen and mailbox. The destination is the tsl mailbox or terminal. The lab tester must verify the correct receipt of the message by manually checking the destination terminal screen. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct message identification number in the laboratory mail queue. Manual verification of the correct message receipt at the destination terminal is performed by the lab tester. The mail message should have been placed onto the mail queue and the message displayed at the destination terminal. SUCCESS: The CD finds the correct message identification number in the mail queue and the correct message appears at the destination terminal. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Message does not appear in either the destination mail queue or at the destination terminal, or appears at one but not the other; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario s_send Scenario s_send tests the Server-SMTP IUT capability to process the SEND command. The CD commands the RD to queue a mail message with a known identification number. The IUT should find the message in the queue and send the message to the destination terminal screen. The lab tester must verify the correct receipt of the message by manually checking the destination terminal screen. The destination is the tsl terminal. 12 March 1987 -15- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 TEST 11: SEND COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION (SENDER-SMTP) Does the Sender-SMTP IUT correctly process the SEND command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the RD. The CD commands the RD to queue a mail message with a known identification number. The IUT should find the message in the queue and send the message to the laboratory destination terminal screen. The destination is the tsl terminal. The lab tester must verify the correct receipt of the message by manually checking the destination terminal screen. VERIFICATION: Manual verification of the correct message receipt at the destination terminal is performed by the lab tester. No mail message should have been placed onto the mail queue. The CD searches for the correct message identification number in the laboratory mail queue. If the message was placed onto the mail queue, then the IUT fails. SUCCESS: The CD does not find the correct message identification number in the mail queue and the correct message appears at the destination terminal. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Message does not appear at the destination terminal, or appears in destination mail queue; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_rset Scenario r_rset tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process the RSET command during a transaction. TEST 12: RSET COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the RSET command during a transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the IUT to start a mail transaction by issuing the HELO and MAIL commands. Then the RSET command is issued and the transaction is resumed. 12 March 1987 -16- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the RSET command and the IUT is able to complete the mail transaction. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command replies of 500, 501, 504, or 421; Command replies other than those listed above; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_rsetrcpt Scenario r_rsetrcpt tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process the RSET command after a RCPT command has been issued. TEST 13: RSET COMMAND AFTER RCPT Does the IUT correctly process the RSET command after a RCPT command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the IUT to start a mail transaction by issuing the HELO, MAIL, and RCPT commands. Then the RSET command is issued and the transaction is resumed. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the RCPT command and the IUT is able to complete the mail transaction. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command replies of 500, 501, 504, or 421; Command replies other than those listed above; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_rsetsoml Scenario r_rsetsoml tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process the RSET command during a SOML transaction. 12 March 1987 -17- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 TEST 14: RSET COMMAND DURING A SOML TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the RSET command during a SOML transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the IUT to start a send or mail transaction by issuing the HELO and SOML commands. Then the RSET command is issued and the transaction is resumed. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the RSET command and the IUT is able to complete the mail transaction. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command replies of 500, 501, 504, or 421; Command replies other than those listed above; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_rsetsaml Scenario r_rsetsaml tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process the RSET command during a SAML transaction. TEST 15: RSET COMMAND DURING A SAML TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the RSET command during a SAML transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the IUT to start a send and mail transaction by issuing the HELO and SAML commands. Then the RSET command is issued and the transaction is resumed. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the RSET command and the IUT is able to complete the mail transaction. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Command replies of 500, 501, 504, or 421; Command replies other than those listed above; Connection not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -18- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario r_vrfy Scenario r_vrfy tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process the VRFY command inside and outside of a transaction. TEST 16: VRFY COMMAND OUTSIDE A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the VRFY outside of a transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO command followed by the VRFY command. The username "test" is used as the parameter to the VRFY command. The remote site must have an account with username "test" for the test to succeed. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 or 251 for the VRFY command. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command reply of 500, 501, 502, 421, or 550. Command reply other than those listed above; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. TEST 17: VRFY COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the VRFY during a transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO and MAIL commands followed by the VRFY command, and then the RCPT command followed by the VRFY command. The username "test" is used as the parameter to the VRFY command. The remote site must have an account with username "test" for the test to succeed. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 or 251 for the VRFY command. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command reply of 500, 501, 502, 421, 550, 551, or 553. Command reply other than those listed above; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -19- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario r_expn Scenario r_expn tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process the EXPN command inside and outside of a mail transaction. TEST 18: EXPN COMMAND OUTSIDE A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the EXPN outside of a transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO command followed by the EXPN command. The groupname "test group" is used as the parameter to the EXPN command. The remote site must have a group with groupname "test group" composed at least of users "test", "test2", and "test3", with "test3" being last in order, for the test to succeed. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the EXPN command. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command reply of 500, 501, 502, 421, or 550 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. TEST 19: EXPN COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the EXPN during a transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO and MAIL commands followed by the EXPN command, and then the RCPT command followed by the EXPN command. The groupname "test group" is used as the parameter to the EXPN command. The remote site must have a group with groupname "test group"< composed at least of of users "test", "test2", "test3", with "test3" being last in order, for the test to succeed. 12 March 1987 -20- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the EXPN command. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command reply of 500, 501, 502, 421, or 550. Command reply other than those listed above; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_help Scenario r_help tests the Receiver-SMTP capability to correctly process the EXPN command inside and outside of a mail transaction. TEST 20: HELP COMMAND OUTSIDE A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the HELP command outside of a transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO command, immediately followed by the HELP command. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 211 or 214 for the HELP command. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command replies of 500, 501, 502, 504 or 421; Command reply other than those listed above; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -21- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 TEST 21: HELP COMMAND DURING A TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the HELP command during a transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO and MAIL commands, followed by the HELP command. Then the RCPT command is issued followed by the HELP command. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 211 or 214 for the HELP command. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command replies of 500, 501, 502, 504 or 421; Command reply other than those listed above; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_nooptrans Scenario r_nooptrans tests the Receiver-SMTP capability to correctly process a sequence of commands, HELO and QUIT, that establishes an SMTP connection and then closes it without initiating a mail transaction. Then, the NOOP command is tested inside and outside a mail transaction. TEST 22: HELO-QUIT SEQUENCE AND NOOP COMMAND INSIDE AND OUTSIDE TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the HELO-QUIT command sequence and the NOOP command inside and outside of a mail transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The HELO command is issued, immediately followed by the QUIT command. A new connection is established, and the NOOP command is issued at various places inside and outside of a mail transaction. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the NOOP command. 12 March 1987 -22- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command replies of 500 or 421 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. TEST 23: NOOP COMMAND OUTSIDE TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the NOOP command outside of a mail transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The HELO command is issued, followed by the NOOP command and the QUIT command. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the NOOP command. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command replies of 500 or 421 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. TEST 24: NOOP COMMAND DURING TRANSACTION Does the IUT correctly process the NOOP command during a mail transaction? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The HELO command is issued, followed by the MAIL and NOOP commands. The RCPT command is then issued followed by another NOOP command. The CD completes the transaction and closes the connection. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the NOOP command and the mail message was sent correctly. 12 March 1987 -23- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command replies of 500 or 421 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_turn Scenario r_turn tests the Receiver- and Sender-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process the TURN command. This scenario begins by testing the IUT in its Receiver-SMTP mode. If the TURN command is implemented and the IUT accepts the command, then the scenario tests the IUT in its Sender-SMTP mode. TEST 25: TURN COMMAND Does the IUT successfully process the TURN command? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The HELO command is issued, followed by the TURN command. If the TURN command is accepted by the IUT, then the IUT is tested as a Sender-SMTP. The CD commands the RD to queue a mail message with a known identification number onto the IUT mail queue. The SMTP connection is then closed and the CD commands the Reference SMTP to listen for a connection attempt from the IUT. The mail transaction is then tested as normal. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies and the correct mail message identification number. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 and the correct message identification number, or the CD receives the command reply 502 indicating "Command not implemented." FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command replies of 500 or 503 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -24- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario r_seqbad Scenario r_seqbad tests the Receiver-SMTP capability to correctly process an invalid sequence of commands. TEST 26: INVALID SEQUENCE OF COMMANDS Does the IUT correctly process an invalid sequence of commands? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The HELO command is issued, followed by the RCPT command. The IUT should send an error reply to the untimely RCPT command. Then the MAIL is issued, followed by the DATA command. The IUT should issue an error reply to the untimely DATA command. Finally a valid sequence of commands is issued. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct error replies, command replies, and message identification number. SUCCESS: The CD receives error replies of 503 for invalid sequences, command replies of 250 for valid sequences, and the correct message identification number. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Successful command replies received when error replies are expected, and vice versa; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_badsyntax Scenario r_badsyntax tests the Receiver-SMTP capability to correctly process commands with invalid syntax. TEST 27: INVALID COMMAND SYNTAX Does the IUT correctly process commands with incorrect syntax? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The HELO command is issued followed by a MAIL command with incorrect syntax. The IUT should reply negatively. The CD then issues a MAIL command with correct syntax. The CD then issues a RCPT command with incorrect syntax. The IUT should reply negatively. The CD then issues a RCPT command with correct syntax. The CD completes the mail transaction and closes the connection. 12 March 1987 -25- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives error replies of 500 for incorrect syntaxes, command replies of 250 for correct syntaxes, and the correct message identification number. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Successful command replies received when error replies are expected, and vice versa; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. TEST 28: INVALID COMMAND SYNTAX (NONEXISTENT COMMAND) Does the IUT correctly process commands with incorrect syntax (nonexistent command)? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The HELO command is issued followed by MAIL and RCPT commands with correct syntax. The IUT should reply positively. The CD then issues a nonexistent command. The IUT should reply negatively. The CD then correctly completes the mail transaction and closes the connection. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies. SUCCESS: The CD receives error replies of 500 for incorrect syntaxes, command replies of 250 for correct syntaxes, and the correct message identification number. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Successful command replies received when error replies are expected, and vice versa; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario s_syntaxbad Scenario s_syntaxbad tests the Sender-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process reply codes with incorrect syntax. 12 March 1987 -26- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 TEST 29: REPLY CODES WITH INCORRECT SYNTAX Does the IUT correctly process reply codes with incorrect syntax? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the RD to place a mail message with a known identification number onto the IUT mail queue. The CD then commands the Reference to listen for a connection attempt from the IUT. The CD replies correctly to the open request and the HELO, MAIL, and RCPT commands, but replies incorrectly to the DATA command. The IUT should reset the connection with the RSET command and then attempt to complete the transaction. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command sequences. SUCCESS: The CD receives the RSET command after sending an incorrect reply code. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Incorrect command received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_hostnames Scenario r_hostnames tests the Receiver-SMTP capability to correctly process hostnames in all valid domain formats. TEST 30: HOSTNAME FORMATS Does the IUT correctly process different hostname formats? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. Mail is sent to the IUT with different hostname formats. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies and message identification number. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for all RCPT commands using valid hostname formats. 12 March 1987 -27- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; RCPT command failure reply of 550, 551, 552, 553, 450, 451, or 452 received; RCPT command error reply of 500, 501, 503, or 421 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_relay Scenario r_relay tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to relay mail messages if the service is offered. TEST 31: MESSAGE RELAYING Does the IUT correctly relay messages? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO and MAIL commands. The RCPT command is issued with a pathname containing a relay. The destination mailbox is the "test" account. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply and the correct mail message identification number. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the RCPT command with the relay pathname. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; RCPT command success reply of 251 received, since the user "test" should be local; RCPT command failure reply of 550, 551, 552, 553, 450, 451, or 452 received; RCPT command error reply of 500, 501, 503, or 421 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_relaymult Scenario r_relaymult tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to relay multiple mail messages if the service is offered. 12 March 1987 -28- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 TEST 32: MULTIPLE MESSAGE RELAYING Does the IUT correctly relay multiple messages? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO and MAIL commands. The RCPT command is issued three times with a pathname containing a relay. The destination mailboxes are the "test", "test2", "test3" accounts. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies and the correct mail message identification numbers. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the RCPT commands with relay pathnames. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; RCPT command success reply of 251 received, since the user "test", "test2", and "test3" should be local; RCPT command failure reply of 550, 551, 552, 553, 450, 451, or 452 received; RCPT command error reply of 500, 501, 503, or 421 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_relay3 Scenario r_relay3 tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to relay mail messages through multiple hosts if the service is offered. TEST 33: MESSAGE RELAYING THROUGH MULTIPLE HOSTS Does the IUT correctly relay messages through multiple hosts? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO and MAIL commands. The RCPT command is issued with a pathname containing a relay through multiple hosts. The destination mailbox is the "test" account. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply and the correct mail message identification number. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command reply of 250 for the RCPT command with the relay pathname. 12 March 1987 -29- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; RCPT command success reply of 251 received, since the user "test" should be local; RCPT command failure reply of 550, 551, 552, 553, 450, 451, or 452 received; RCPT command error reply of 500, 501, 503, or 421 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_relaybad Scenario r_relaybad tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to notify the sender of undeliverable messages if the service is offered. TEST 34: UNDELIVERABLE MESSAGES Does the IUT correctly notify the sender of undeliverable messages? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO and MAIL commands. The RCPT command is issued with a pathname containing a nonexistent username. The destination mailbox is a fictitious account. The name used is "no relay." VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command error reply and the correct mail message identification number. SUCCESS: The CD receives a command failure reply of 550 for the RCPT command with the nonexistent username. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; RCPT command success reply of 250 or 251 received; RCPT command failure reply of 551, 552, 553, 450, 451, or 452 received; RCPT command error reply of 500, 501, 503, or 421 received; Command reply other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -30- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario r_revpath Scenario r_revpath tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to prepend the reverse-path to an incoming message. TEST 35: REVERSE-PATH Does the IUT prepend the reverse-path to incoming messages? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD completes a mail transaction (HELO, MAIL, RCPT, DATA, and QUIT). The CD then commands the IUT to spool the message. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply codes and the correct reverse-path name in the mail message. SUCCESS: The CD receives successful command replies and the correct reverse-path name ("FROM:<tsl@protolabb>") is prepended to the message. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command reply errors; Reverse-path name wrong or nonexistent; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_nullrevpath Scenario r_nullrevpath tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to prevent loops in error reporting. Loops are prevented by allowing a null reverse-path to be specified. This scenario verifies that the IUT accepts null reverse-paths. TEST 36: PREVENTION OF ERROR LOOPS (NULL REVERSE-PATH) Does the IUT accept null reverse-paths? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD issues the HELO command, then MAIL commands with null reverse paths. The mail transaction is completed as normal. The CD then commands the IUT to spool the mail message. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply codes and the correct reverse-path name in the mail message. 12 March 1987 -31- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 SUCCESS: The CD receives successful command replies and the correct null reverse-path name ("FROM:<>") is prepended to the message. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure; Connection not made; Command reply errors; Null reverse-path wrong or nonexistent; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_undeliver Scenario r_undeliver tests the Receiver-SMTP capability to process mail addressed to a nonexistent user. TEST 37: UNDELIVERABLE MAIL Does the IUT correctly process mail addressed to a nonexistent user? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The HELO and MAIL commands are sent. Then the CD issues the RCPT command with a nonexistent user ("XXX NO SUCH dude" followed by a RCPT command with a valid user name ("test"). VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply codes and the correct message identification number in the mail message. SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct error reply code of 550 to the RCPT command with the nonexistent user and the correct message identification number is received for the valid message. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command replies other than those listed above received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -32- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario r_timestamp Scenario r_timestamp tests the Receiver-SMTP capability to affix a timestamp to the beginning of the mail message upon receipt. TEST 38: MESSAGE TIMESTAMP Does the IUT affix a timestamp to the beginning of the mail message. ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD completes a normal mail transaction. The CD commands the RD to spool the message. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply codes and the correct reverse-path name in the mail message. SUCCESS: The CD receives successful command replies and the correct timestamp is prepended to the message. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command reply errors; Timestamp wrong or nonexistent; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario s_replybad Scenario s_replybad tests the Server-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process an incorrect command reply from the peer Receiver-SMTP. TEST 39: INCORRECT RECEIVER REPLIES Does the IUT correctly process incorrect command replies from the peer Receiver-SMTP? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the RD to place a mail message with a known message identification number onto the IUT mail queue. The CD commands the Reference Receiver-SMTP to listen for a connection attempt from the IUT. The Sender SMTP IUT should find the message in the queue and initiate a mail transaction with the Reference Receiver-SMTP. The Reference Receiver-SMTP replies correctly to the connection opening and the HELO, MAIL, and RCPT commands, but replies incorrectly to the DATA command. The IUT should attempt to reset the connection with the RSET command and then complete the mail transaction. 12 March 1987 -33- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct commands and the correct message id number. SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct commands and the correct message id number. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Incorrect commands received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_transpar Scenario r_transpar tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process the data transparency sequence. TEST 40: DATA TRANSPARENCY SEQUENCE Does the IUT correctly process the data transparency sequence? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD initiates a normal mail transaction. The mail message data contains an embedded end-of-data sequence followed by a known identification number or string. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command reply codes and the correct message identification string. SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct command reply codes and the correct message identification number or string. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Incorrect reply codes received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_longcmd Scenario r_longcmd tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process a command line longer than the allowed 512 bytes. 12 March 1987 -34- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 TEST 41: EXCESSIVELY LONG COMMAND LINE Does the IUT correctly process an excessively long command line? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD initiates a normal mail transaction. The CD sends a command line exceeding 512 bytes in length. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command error reply and the correct message id number. SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct command error reply of either 500 or 501 and the correct message id number. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Successful command reply received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_longtext Scenario r_longtext tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process a text line exceeding the allowed 1000 bytes. TEST 42: EXCESSIVELY LONG TEXT LINE Does the IUT correctly process text lines exceeding 1000 bytes in length? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD initiates a normal mail transaction. The CD sends a text line exceeding 1000 bytes in length. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command error reply and the correct message id number. SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct command error reply of either 500 or 501 and the correct message id number. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Successful command reply received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -35- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario s_longline Scenario s_longline tests the Server-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process an excessively long reply line. TEST 43: EXCESSIVELY LONG REPLY LINE Does the IUT correctly process reply lines exceeding the allowed 512 bytes? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD command the RD to place a message with a known message identification number onto the IUT mail queue. The CD commands the Reference Receiver-SMTP to listen for a connection attempt from the IUT. The Sender-SMTP IUT should find the message in the queue and initiate a mail transaction with the Reference Receiver-SMTP. The Reference Receiver-SMTP replies correctly to the connection opening and the HELO command, but replies incorrectly to the MAIL command. The IUT should attempt to reset the connection with the RSET command and then complete the mail transaction. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct commands and the correct message id number. SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct commands and the correct message id number. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Incorrect commands received; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario r_ascii Scenario r_ascii tests the Receiver-SMTP IUT capability to correctly process all printable ASCII characters as mail data. TEST 44: ASCII DATA Does the IUT correctly process all the printable ASCII characters as mail data? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD initiates a normal mail transaction. The CD sends all the printable ASCII characters as mail data along with a message identification number. The CD completes the transaction normally. 12 March 1987 -36- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies, the ASCII characters in the mail message, and the correct message identification number. SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct command replies, the ASCII characters, and the correct message identification number. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Command error replies received; All ASCII characters not received correctly; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. Scenario s_ascii Scenario s_ascii tests the Sender-SMTP IUT capability to send all the printable ASCII characters as mail data. TEST 45: ASCII DATA Does the IUT correctly process all the printable ASCII characters as mail data? ACTION: The CD establishes a connection with the IUT. The CD commands the RD to place a mail message containing all the printable ASCII characters and a known identification string onto the IUT mail queue. The IUT should mail the message to the Reference Receiver-SMTP. VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct commands and the correct mail data in the mail message. SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct commands and the correct ASCII characters and identification string in the mail message. FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Connection not made; Incorrect commands received; All ASCII characters not received,: RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Message id is wrong or nonexistent. 12 March 1987 -37- Unisys Corporation TM-WD-8801/610/01 Scenario r_multismtp Scenario r_multismtp tests the Receiver-SMTP capability to process two or more simultaneous SMTP transactions. This scenario requires multiple Lab Drivers. TEST 46: MULTIPLE SMTP Does the IUT correctly process multiple, simultaneous SMTP transactions? ACTION: The CD establishes multiple connections with the IUT. The CD executes a normal mail transaction for each connection: VERIFICATION: The CD searches for the correct command replies and correct message identification numbers for each connection: SUCCESS: The CD receives the correct command replies and correct message id numbers for each connection: FAILURE: Any of the following indicates an IUT failure: Any of the connections not made; RD does not correctly interpret CD commands, or acknowledge CD commands, or format IUT responses; Any message id is wrong or nonexistent.