home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
GEMini Atari
/
GEMini_Atari_CD-ROM_Walnut_Creek_December_1993.iso
/
files
/
tt
/
tt_1
/
topic35.txt
(
.txt
)
Wrap
Text File
|
1989-09-25
|
390KB
|
8,819 lines
================================================================================
(C) 1989 by Atari Corporation, GEnie, and the Atari Roundtables. May
be reprinted only with this notice intact. The Atari Roundtables on GEnie
are *official* information services of Atari Corporation.
To sign up for GEnie service, call (with modem) 800-638-8369. Upon
connection type HHH (RETURN after that). Wait for the U#= prompt.
Type XJM11877,GEnie and hit RETURN. The system will prompt you for your
information.
================================================================================
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 1 Sat Jun 10, 1989
R.MOYER1 at 04:06 EDT
Can anyone give me any definitive answers about the T Like what features,will
it be a true multitasking machine like the Amiga as I've heard it rumored? I'm
sincerely interested in this, and please, no Amiga/ST bashing please. Keep
that to CAT 18....
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 2 Sat Jun 10, 1989
TOWNS at 20:52 EDT
Sorry.. The TT is still under development and we can not release
specifications on the machine until it is announced formally. Once
that happens, you can ask away!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 3 Sun Jun 11, 1989
R.MOYER1 at 08:15 EDT
Oh, I was under the impression that it was pending release anytime now and
that everyone else new about it except me.....;-)
Oh well, go ahead and TPUrge this topic then if you wish, thanks.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 4 Sun Jun 11, 1989
M.MCCANN2 at 11:59 EDT
R.MOYER1: If you will check back issues of ST Report, you will find ALL sorts
of speculation about the TT. As for MT, it is supposed to run Unix 5.3.1, I
believe was the rumor; is that MT enough? And also (I presume) supposed to
have TOS 1.4 in ROM, as I have heard it said it runs Dungeonmaster (blindingly
fast, I presume). If it runs that, it would have to be extremely ST-
compatible...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 5 Sun Jun 11, 1989
C.DAYMON at 20:09 EDT
R.MOYER1,
You also may look into the messages and articles discussing the ATW
(previously know as the Abaq). There was an article in a past Byte issue.
Parallel processing and blinding speed with VERY high-end graphics ability.
It is currently shipping in europe. (1024x768 with 256 colors from a 16
million pallette, 1280x960 with 16 from the same pallette and two other
resolutions including one where, I think, all 16 million colors can be used at
once - given that many pixels.) It runs the Helios operating system which is
supposed to be a very Unix-like operating system for parallel processing and
comes with X-Windows. Don't hold me to the accuracy of this information cause
several things have changed since the first article, but I think most of this
is still true.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 6 Sun Jun 11, 1989
BREHBOCK at 22:30 CDT
Quick vote everybody! I vote this topic be closed until the TT is formally
announced. It will keep rumours down and let John stay on top of current
topics (like the ATW :-) !)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 7 Sun Jun 11, 1989
G.E.M. at 23:10 PDT
Nah, if you close it down someone will just open another one. I vote that it
be left open, that way it all stays in one place.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 8 Mon Jun 12, 1989
GORDON at 19:58 EDT
Rumers.... Rumers.... Rumers.... Rumers.... Rumers.... Rumers...
TO Fuel the fires... The reason 1.4 is being delayed is to make sure it works
on the TT!!! There for any software that runs under 1.4 on the Megas and STs
will run on the TT. (not multitasking)
But the TT is supposed to run UNIX.. Unix is multitasking..
TT is months away... I mean common Atari announced the Stacy in April with a
June delivery date and now hope they will have it out in September if the TT
is not announced yet it is MONTHS...
But I think it will be worth waiting for... (THat is if we don't have to wait
to long)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 9 Mon Jun 12, 1989
TOWNS at 22:19 EDT
I am sorry to ask this.. but, what is the POINT of that last message
Gordon?
I am missing something? If so, please tell me.
And let me clear things up.. TOS 1.4 is NOT being delayed for UNIX or
Multi-Tasking capabilities. In fact, it is NOT being delayed at all..
We are working as fast as we can to get a release to dealers to upgrade
the existing userbase. As soon as we have an OFFICAL release date on
this product, we will pass it along.
-- John Townsend
Atari Corporation
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 10 Mon Jun 12, 1989
TLMAY [Terry May] at 19:29 PDT
Gordon,
You seem to imply that TOS 1.4 is still under development... Didn't John say
that it's at the MANUFACTURING plant???
;^)
Darn things take awhile to burn, no?
-=<Terry May>=-
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 11 Tue Jun 13, 1989
TOWNS at 02:14 EDT
Yes, there is a significant lead time on these things.. We are
working on improving this as we speak..
-- John Townsend
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 12 Tue Jun 13, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 12:52 EDT
Burning ROMS do take about 2 months...
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 13 Tue Jun 13, 1989
C.DAYMON at 18:54 EDT
I hate to say this now because TT development seems to be so far along, but it
would really be great to see the TT come out with the Renderman interface
routines in ROM. That would sure set the TT above the Mac IIx and give Atari
a great "IN" to the graphics community. (This, of course, would be in
addition to TOS 1.4 in ROM.) From the little I know of the Renderman
interface, it seems that some of the routines could even share code with the
TOS graphic routines. My understanding is that it is a software interface to
provide portable function names to many high-end graphic routines. If Atari
wanted to bypass licensing fees with Pixar, they could even provide the
functions with different names and then 3rd party compiler developers could
provide links to the functions with names that were Renderman compatible.
Actually, I'm not really sure Pixar expects a licensing fee.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 14 Wed Jun 14, 1989
GRIBNIF at 00:38 EDT
Craig,
Write the routines into C libraries and sell them to developers.
Rick
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 15 Wed Jun 14, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 18:27 MDT
A friend of mine just got a Mac IIX (with a 68030) and a color monitor, and a
65 meg hardd rive for $4500!! He has me drooling, except that I still don't
like Mac's OS and how they handle graphics(thru software in ROM no less!!!).
So, I don't want no Mac IIX, I wannna TT!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 16 Thu Jun 15, 1989
TOWNS at 01:56 EDT
$4500.00? I find that hard to believe. Sounds like he got an _extremely_ good
price or something..
As for TT, wait and see... I think you will like it.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 17 Thu Jun 15, 1989
S.JOHNSON10 at 02:34 EDT
But will the TT still be available by September? Or is it more likely to be
delayed until sometime next year?!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 18 Thu Jun 15, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 09:03 EDT
He probably got the developer price. Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 19 Thu Jun 15, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 22:18 MDT
TOWNS:
My Mac friend got the Mac iix, used, from a desperate ASU student.
The student had just graduated and needed the bucks more then the
computer. So, my Mac friend was just in the right place at the
right time.
Who knows, maybe the ASU student will buy an ST with his $$$ !!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 20 Sat Jun 17, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 23:14 MDT
hmmm OK, there isn't much available info. on the TT, well is there a section
around here to discuss the ATW? Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 21 Sun Jun 18, 1989
A.RICHARDSO7 [ATW MAN!] at 21:38 EDT
I would welcome an ATW column with wide open arms! It was last reported
shipping in Europe and lately going into the hands of US developers. If that
info is correct, someone should be able to comment responsibly on its actual
capabilities, characteristics, and quirks. Sysops: What do you think??
Andy Richardson
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 22 Tue Jun 20, 1989
T.ONDERS [Tim Onders] at 19:03 EDT
Canadian developers have had ATW's for 4 months or so now =)
-Tim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 23 Tue Jun 20, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:26 PDT
And what have they to say ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 24 Tue Jun 20, 1989
BREHBOCK at 23:38 CDT
Ok, ok, as long as the topic's open... John, have you heard about somebody
(big... Pheonix, QMS?) putting PostScript to raster conversion in a PostScript
co-processor? Sounds like a shoe-in for display PostScript on the TT. Looks
like the Stever (Jobs) may have missed the boat by 6 months.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 25 Wed Jun 21, 1989
QMI at 01:36 EDT
With the new prices on the Sun 3/80, SPARCStation 1 and Sun 386i, I can't
understand why Atari would continue with TT development. Even Apple is
wondering what to do with a IIcx priced about the same as the Sun and the
equaly-priced Sun runs about twice as fast as the Mac IIx's. If Atari can
price a fully-equiped TT (80Meg HD, large monitor, 4M RAM with all ports) at
$4000 retail (and a 40% dealer margin) they might be able to move them. They
will need to pick up big name dealer support like Sun just did with
ComputerLand. Just call me skeptical!
I just saw the Sun 8-bit graphics co-processor card (~$2000) and there are
no words to descibe it. It is a fraction of the cost of any board that
attempts to do hi-speed 2D+ hardware hooked directly into an OS. The Mac has
nothing close. It takes less than a screen retrace time to redraw a complete
complex large-window drawing (in other words, you can't see it drawing!).
Well, it does require 8Megs of RAM. But at about $15,000 complete system
price, noone else comes close.
Back to reality. (My mother told me never to stare at the 'Sun' to long).
JD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 26 Wed Jun 21, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 10:08 EDT
I agree with you there John, the workstation marketis in for a shakedown. Now
if Atari had come out with it when I saw it two years ago...
I'll bet that the TT doesn't cost less than $5000 either.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 27 Wed Jun 21, 1989
GORDON at 15:44 EDT
John if Atari does not continue developing the TT what are they going to do?
The Mega and ST design is going on 5 years old. IT
is old techonolgy. They will not be able to sell it for much longer. When
the ST was introduced the IBM was selling a 8088 cpu
called the XT. Mac was still on the original 128K itty bitty
expensive cpu. Now IBM is selling 80386's that fly (the 286 was
also introduced in there someplace) Mac is selling a bigger and
faster cpu. (lets see they had a Mac SE and A MAc II) even the
Amiga has came out with a 68020 board and has shown (but not sold
) a 68030 board. Atari either comes out with a TT soon or they
get out of the computer business!
The world has passed them buy and left them.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 28 Thu Jun 22, 1989
QMI at 00:16 EDT
Gordon: exactly right... either Atari has a killer 68030 machine now and at
$4000 complete, they are out of the computer business. Based on past
experiences, I don't think they have a chance. Even if the hardware is above
average (Atari computers usually are solid on the technical design) the
support and marketing will be lacking as usual.
Mark: Anybody that stay in touch with the market trends has to be blind not
to see the handwriting on the wall. Us little guys in the trenches seem to
know more than Atari does... but I still have a firm desire to see them
succeed. I've made a big investment over the last 4 years and would like to
get something in return.
The computer race is more than price/performance these days. The ones that
are winning have a rare combination of marketing skills and are willing to
make a long-term investment in all aspects of support: dealer, developer,
user and specialty markets. IBM succeeds only in sheer size (I think they fail
in most other areas). Apple seems to be committed in all the areas. Sun has
the right combination and are extending that to the higher end microcomputer
market. When I think about what Atari has succeded in doing, I rank them down
around Coleco and XYZ no-name clone company.
C'mon Atari, make a liar out of me!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 29 Thu Jun 22, 1989
WHITESTR at 18:15 PDT
Hmmmm...I figured a year ago that Atari Higher-ups (read Mr. L and
brothers) were finding themselves in the throws of a serious marketing
dilemna...--> Do we break into the US market with a _really_ serious
tool, our Transputer Workstation, or
--> Do we 'downgrade' the workstation's tooling to a level
which should fit into the advanced home business
computer user slot?
Problem was two fold. Number one, as made clear by public Atari Corp.
statements (Sam T. and Neil H.), it has been evident to everyone who
follows the industry closely that the American computer using public
has been getting progressively more demanding with regards to power
and high-end graphics. As a CD-ROM developer, for instance, it is clear
that what people really expect in multi-media entertainment/education
is TV quality graphics with synchonized sound...plus, of course, glich
free interaction. I recall being told by the head of Atari's CD-ROM
project at the time that what I would _really_ want to be developing
for was their upcoming TT.
However, even a 68030 chip can handle real time video processing only
so well. And is that TT meant to be for the 'developer/professional'
or for the passive consumer also? Perhaps the consumer just needs high
res graphics and good sound and a *no-more-than-fast-enough* chip set
to passively (more or less) play back applications. Such a current
computer shouldn't have to cost over $2-3000 should it?
Which brings us to the second half of this dilemna. If the TT is meant
to be a 'consumer' machine, than we're talking _real_ serious 'Business
is War' price cutting. What with the way we all knew even a year ago
that the workstation market was getting very competitive, it seemed that
breaking into the US jaded home computer mindset required graphic power
(at least as good as the old TV) for a truly affordable price
(read ...not $4-5000 which is what all the 'other' companies would be
shooting for). If that is so, than perhaps the high-end developers and
professionals should be catered to first (read ATW) 'cause without those
developers pushing the envelope (who naturally want the most power and
*long-term non-obsolescence*) there is no way there is going to be
entertainment and consumer oriented projects developed which make use of
the current capabilities of hardware like CD-ROM or CD-I and hi res color.
So, now we see possible major boo-boo, which reads keep ATW out of US
market so that it doesn't upstage the TT, but oh no, the TT now looks
like it will shine dimly compared to the Sun and other rising stars, but
since the high-end ATW is being kept somewhere in the stratosphere (read
the European Elites) the TT must play ATW's role in the US with price
and hype to match, but the developers/hackers/real-creative-people no
longer will think the TT worth the money compared to its competitors and
know damn well that it is going to be rapidly bypassed by RISC technology
and truly capable graphic machines (again, needed for efficient animation
and high res graphic and CD work...just listen to all the hassle the Mac
II people have had trying to get their computers to gracefully do TV
quality work.)
Sooooo......thank goodness the ATW is finally being ADMITTED
in the US marketplace, at least to a few developers and occasionally
in public (such as the Canadian notice posted earlier)....and lets
hope Atari recognizes just how ruthlessly the consumers and developers
are beginning to play this field of information technology...few of us
will put up with the short end of the stick for reasons of blind
loyalty and hyped conviction.
Dai Le'on (sorry about the rambling length....I'll stay off the
soapbox for a while....(:)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 30 Fri Jun 23, 1989
GORDON at 10:18 EDT
Lots of interesting points.. In your statement.. But how is Atari
going to sell into the workstation market? They do not have the sales force,
the service dept, or the mentality to do this. Atari likes to call up Kmart,
Sears etc and sell 50,000 machines to them
and not have people call them up and ask dumb questions.
I takes a whole differnt outlook to sell $5000 computers then it does $300
portfollios or $150 hand held game machines.. Atari will do much better with
the latter!!
The way the company is set up now they will never be able to successfully
sell a high priced computer!
Think about this.. If Atari was a new company with no past reputation, no
user base, the amount of advertising they had (none!)
how many ST's do you think they would have sold? Not very many..
The game machines made the ST..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 31 Fri Jun 23, 1989
QMI at 23:31 EDT
"Blue light special in isle 12 on Un*x boxes!"...
I suppose Atari management must be smart enough to know that the TT needs a
whole new way of doing business. I know they can design a good machine and
have it made cheaply but after that I start to worry.
For this machine, the game image and name recognition will be outweighed on
the bad side... at the name recognition helped sell the ST and bring along 8-
bit owners. The university crowd and the scientific community would rather see
a new brand name with a great price. Atari should do what Panasonic did on
stereo equipment around the early '70's... they had a problem being considered
as a cheap transistor radio company... they used the Technics brand name in
the US (National in other countries) and had a small "by Panasonic" under it.
After they had some success marketing it, they took the Panasonic off
altogether. Atari should start a new division (possibly team up with a well-
known Un*x software house for support), create a new name (ACME computers
would even be better!) and dispose of the Atari brand when ever PR makes sense
to do so.
John <the dime-store management consultant> DeMar
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 32 Sat Jun 24, 1989
TLMAY [Terry May] at 00:13 PDT
John,
I agree...a new name is necessary for the _general_ public to take the Atari
computers seriously. Atari can't keep depending on former Atari users and
their friends for support.
Your analogy of Panasonic was a good one.
-=<Terry May>=-
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 33 Sat Jun 24, 1989
WHITESTR at 09:21 PDT
As to some marketing ideas concerning the ATW and TT, Gordon, here's what
I would suggest...
First, immediately drop any intentions to con the hacker/artist
entrepreneur into committing to long-term education/entertainment
development based solely on the TT as his/her primary workstation tool.
Second, package the TT similarly to the ST, i.e. as a consumer product
with the basic ports needed to plug in mail-order parts, with a generic
graphical interface (*must* go beyond vanilla X-Windows), with 'neat-o'
sound and VGA comparable monitor. In other words, give 'em just enough.
(Certainly, Un!x was a smart move, as was TOS compatibility.)
Next, let it be known that the TT is replacing the ST as the standard
model in the Atari line. With that position comes the assurance
that the TT will be gradually upgraded, that its marketing will be
handled similiarly to the ST's except for a major change in advertising
policy (i.e. same level of customer support, continued attempt to sell
through upmarket dedicated stores <--grant it, limited progress here,
but the TT would be considerably more attractive for the retailer) and
that in return for buying Atari, the end-user gets generic power for a
very affordable price.
Simple enough, nothing too threatening to current corporate patterns...
And while this public position is rapidly being consolidated, Atari
needs a secret weapon, appropriated into the hands of a distinctly
Atari circle, the interdisciplinary hacker. Now I know not everyone
is going to agree with me here, but, from my observations, there exists
a circle of ST users (along with Mac and Amiga) whose primary interests
lie not in rudimentary (or obscure) computational techno-stuff nor in the
drab complexities of 'business', but in the ARTS and HUMANITIES!
So I suggest that US Atari puts together a somewhat European imported
working group (likely stationed in Canada, actually) of inter-
disciplinary ATW folk to explicitly offer developer/high-end user
support for the sort of work which is portable and down-grade-able
to the masses through VGA level personal computers, CD-ROM, and possibly
CD-I machines or the entertainment specific players of the future.
Characters such as Tim Oren come to mind.
Is not this what NEXT and Jobs are attempting? Small is appropriate in
this case...takes a sort of interest and intelligence and vision
which goes a bit beyond just technical leadership (Sam T. spends time
in Canada, yes?)
Thus, to sum up...marketing of the TT is no problem if Atari doesn't
try to make too much out of it. Marketing of the ATW must extend into
multimedia (even IBM recently embraced multimedia _very_ strongly tho
only from the long-term potential of DVI) and involve not only the
sciences but the arts and humanities also (journalistic possibilites
with these tools are enormous, if not obvious...I'm thinking here of
the de-centralization of the film and TV and research industries.) This
is likely only going to happen if US Atari and Overseas Atari can co-opt
possibly through Canada Atari (hope Julius didn't quit because of
policies which make this scenario totally unlikely.)
Dai Le'on
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 34 Sat Jun 24, 1989
QMI at 12:43 EDT
That SOUNDS all well and good but Atari builds for mass marketing and the
low price prevents them from being too sophisticated with the support, etc.
The 'cerebral' approach you're talking about might work for the ATW but that's
not the critical machine for Atari to be profitable. The transputer could wake
up some high-end users to the TT but the only way I see Atari making headway
in the next year is to team up with a UN*X support company, and get the thing
out soon! They will need a mainstreamed, consistent, continuous
marketing/advertising effort and NOT depend on enthusiasts and word-of-mouth
to sell the thing!
John <what makes him such an authority?> DeMar
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 35 Sat Jun 24, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 14:22 EDT
Sorry, but I really can't see them pulling it off. You can run a Amiga with a
68030 in it, and they have sold over 1,000,000 machines now. Apple now has
the Mac IIcx (it's a beauty) and they will have a 33 mhz '030 machine out this
year. Atari once said they would have a new machine out every 6 months.
Apple has a new one out every four! And they are being taken seriously by the
business and scientific community.
Suns are getting cheaper too. I really can't see Atari breaking to the
workstation market. Maybe two years ago...
If they can come out with a _cheap_ 68030 St, then maybe. But I don't see
them doing that. Problem is, the market's caught up with Atari. They have
always known how to make inexpensive machines. But now the market has become
much more complex and saturated. Other people know how to make cheap machines
too (Apple is an example with the IIcx). And the rest have been forced into
lowering their prices.
The same thing happened with the consumer electronics field (radios and
such). The first Walkman cost $200.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 36 Sat Jun 24, 1989
TOWNS at 19:42 EDT
At the Fall Comdex in Las Vegas, Sam stated that we were shipping
between 60,000 and 70,000 units worldwide per month (depending on
the month) of ST/MEGA computers.
We have been doing this for sometime. I think we have well over a
1,000,000 units out there.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 37 Sun Jun 25, 1989
QMI at 01:35 EDT
John,
He also stated that only 10% of the ST's were being shipped to the U.S.
market... leaving 6000 to 7000 per month here. Knowing what has went on
between Fall COmdex and now, I would say the numbers are far less than that
today. With about 200 active dealers left, and buying 10 machines a month on
average, I would say the number is more like 2000/month in the US! If I could
login to your billing system on your VAX, I bet these numbers wouldn't be far
off. Let's get moving!
We know more ST's are being shipped outside the US, so where are they going?
I talked with a manager at Atari UK who said they are selling mostly as a game
machine (actually bundling games and advertising that fact!). Told me the
market for applications is very slow. I wouldn't doubt that Germany is getting
a good percentage of them but they only buy harware and blank disks! I have
heard from several different sources that the dealers sell blanks, hand out
copy programs, and let you have anything you want and copy iy right in the
store!
I know this is the TT topic but you brought it up. I'm only bringing out
these pesimistic fact in order for someone to turn things around the other
way. There is no room for error with the TT when competing with the likes of
Apple and Sun! Apple can sell 50,000 Mac II's a month and they're a $6000
machine, not a $800 ST.
John <whining again> DeMar
PS: At the rate Atari was going when the ST first shipped, there should be a
RISC-based lap-top machine with a holographic display buy now!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 38 Sun Jun 25, 1989
M.LOADER1 [Mike Loader] at 00:18 PDT
Atari ads in Canada say that there are over 1.2 million ST's out there.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 39 Sun Jun 25, 1989
P.MCCULLOUGH at 14:10 EDT
Is the $+4500 Unix TT intended for the home market? If so- it will fail- No
home consumer will spend above $2000 for a home computer. (In fact, even a
large screen TV in this price range is difficult to move!) I think the Unix
TT is a silly idea- businesses just won won't buy Atari computers- period. I
think a better alternative would be the cancellation of the Mega ST-2, and
520ST along with lower pricing on the 1040ST (Better if Atari makes it into a
Mega ST1!) and on the Mega ST4 (Greater draw on DTP sales-). This would place
the 1040/Mega ST1 in the 520ST niche, the Mega ST4 into the Mega ST2 niche
(Albeit with a slightly higher price-) and allow the TT (w/o Unix) to fill the
Mega ST4 slot (At around the current suggested pricing of the Mega ST4). As
for the ATW- sell it to Universities w/o the Atari name on it- lets face it
the name hurts. Look how Commodore marketed the Amiga without pushing their
name until the computer had a committed market. (This may be a good idea for
the TT, too. Or create a spin-off company for marketing these machines-) I
believe D-RAM prices and other IC costs have fallen (and continue to fall)
enough to justify a price decrease for these machines- and wasn't it Jack
Tramiel who chastised IBM and Apple for high prices not too long ago? This
looks for a fine opportunity to repeat history, and bring Atari back as a
solid competitor.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 40 Sun Jun 25, 1989
TOWNS at 17:00 EDT
John,
Your numbers and figures are way off.. I will leave it at that.
As for TT marketing.. no one has stated the market position of
such a machine publicly. How can any expect me to comment on the
intended market for such a machine.
When TT is announced formally, then we can start to discuss the
type of market it will compete in. Until that happens, this is
all just guesswork.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 41 Sun Jun 25, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 16:42 MDT
A few things here...first, the TT should be marketed exactly like the NeXT
machine is being handled. They both sound like they would target similar
markets. The ATW should be marketed as tose new Sun Sparcs stations. OK, easy
right? :-) Atari needs to do more of what Apple did with the Mac and like
what Jobbes (was that spelled right?) is doing with the NeXT. Have big press
conferences with flashy demos and get the people interestead. The NeXT was a
rather bland machine and I think that the TT would be a good competitor. As
far as the ATW is concerned, we are getting more tricky. The ATW cannot be
sold through the normal local dealers, It must be distributed by the big
names such as Computerland as well as any local Atari dealers that want to
carry it, but the normal Atari dealers don't get the right custommers. I also
feel that the Atari 8-bit and games section should keep the Atari name, but
the 16 and 32 bit computers should get a different one. Atari's main problem
AGAIN is marketing. I have given many speeches about how bad it is and how
they can improve it, but I don't feel like doing that now. All I can say is
that the TT should be present to fight it out with tthe NeXT machine, but the
ATW needs special attention, and to get out fast! Here is a possable marketing
suggestion. The ATW should be offered in a "bundled" form. Unlike the STs
where the person buys the computer and then the neccessary hardware and
software, the ATW should come in different forms for the specific job it is to
do. For example, if it were to be used as a CAD system (I think I read that
someone was using it to design cars), sell it with the maximum graphics
available, a large amount of ram the best math and 3-D coordinate
coprocessors, and offer discounts, or at least reccomend certain software
packages. The people who are going to buy the ATW are not going to be like
the people who buy STs and can help themselves to whatever software they like,
they don't want to shop, they just want to buy. They could really care less
whether it was an IBM, or an Atari as long as the Atari could support certain
starndards. They would be more inclined to buy an IBM because they have heard
of it, but this type of people would buy an Atari if it made sense and was an
easy purchase. In other words, they would not be willing to drive a long d
distance to their nearest dealer, buy the computer, and then mail order
software. They would want to make one purchase of computer/software, and only
contact the dealer for support/help or to upgrade. Wow for not wanting to talk
about marketing, I sure did. Thud--there, I fell of the soapbox, Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 42 Sun Jun 25, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 16:43 MDT
.........oh by the way, I would like to see a ATW topic, I'm not much of a
Unix person myself......... Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 43 Sun Jun 25, 1989
A.RICHARDSO7 [ATW MAN!] at 21:39 EDT
My 2 cents: ATW all the way!! The ATW is Atari's best product. It is
rumored to carry a reasonable price tag. All it needs is quality peripera
oops peripherals and software. Marketing would be easy -- anyone who sees it
will want to buy it if you show it properly! The ATW should be Atari's next
bread and butter product.....
Andy Richardson
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 44 Sun Jun 25, 1989
M.MCCANN2 at 21:52 EDT
Hmm...Honda has Acura, and I think Nissan and Toyota are in process of goin
same (upscale) route. Infiniti? et al. Cadillac? Lincoln? Is ATW the
"Cadillac" of Ataris?? What's an ST, a Ford? A PC4, Chevy?? A 2600, a Yugo???
;^)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 45 Mon Jun 26, 1989
TOWNS at 02:12 EDT
Feel free to start a ATW topic if you would like.. I would like to
see some discussions on the computer as well.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 46 Mon Jun 26, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 23:20 MDT
TOWNS:
A local TV station had a piece on the NeXT computers that the
local university (Az State U ASU) got. anyway, it was amazing just
how impressed they were with a machine that doesn't even have color!!
Now, if only Atari could get the TT out and into the Universities like
ASU, maybe we could finally get some respect for Atari computers!!
So, what's the marketing plans for the TT?? Are you all going to push
TTs to universities and colleges??
Is Atari going to try to line up some big shops like ComputerLand or
BussinessLand to sell the TTs??
Because, as much as I like my local ST dealer, I just can't see him selling a
$6K+ UNIX computer!!! Most of the ST dealers just have enough expertise to
sell STs or maybe Amigas!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 47 Tue Jun 27, 1989
S.JOHNSON10 at 03:13 EDT
It seems as if the TT won't be available for quite some time(early 1990,
perhaps?)! Atari always seems to release new stuff long after everyone else
hasreleased theirs! It looks as if the ATW is the only thing Atari has going
for it, and that's not a home computer, at least for MOST homes it isn't! It
also looks as if all Atari's DON'T SAY ANYTHING policy does is gets Atari
users absolutely frustrated! I know Atari THINKS they know what they're
doing, but do they REALLY? /s
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 48 Tue Jun 27, 1989
GORDON at 11:11 EDT
I think QMI's numbers are more accurate then yours Towns.. 70,000
a month.. no way. Thats 840,000 a year. Atari is not selling that
many ST's. Maybe ST's and 8 bits added together..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 49 Tue Jun 27, 1989
GORDON at 11:12 EDT
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 51 Tue Jun 27, 1989
GORDON at 12:15 EDT
Yes, But by Atari announcing theirs early they get to set the price for
everyone. <grin>
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 52 Tue Jun 27, 1989
HS [Holly] at 15:26 EDT
Oh, I'm sorry... but I do find it VERY amusing that all you guys outside are
telling someone who actually works for the company what the company's sales
figures are... *laugh*
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 53 Tue Jun 27, 1989
QMI at 18:32 EDT
Towns,
I will stick by my estimates because I have first-hand information to back
it up. The fact that Atari doesn't brag about the numbers is proof itself. I
think you will find any developer who is willing to admit it will tell you
that sales are at an all-time low and would agree with my numbers. Disagreeing
with us will not change the facts.
I understand completely that Atari needs to put on a front to keep things
from getting worse than they already are... and I agree with that in
principal. But, I hear that Sig is complaining about the bad press and the
pesimistic views in the Atari community and wants everyone to change their
tone. That's almost insulting! It's past the point where people are willing to
stand behind Atari with nothing happening. If Sig's request had followed a
significant new release by Atari, I would have praised it highly and passed on
the word to every disbeliever.
Back to the topic at hand. I think this topic should continue (TT)
regardless of the fact that Atari hasn't officially announced the product.
The TT is too significant to wait until AFTER Atari announces to give them
some feedback... now is the time to make the engineering and marketing changes
necessary to make it a success. If Atari does not value the insight of
developers and users who may know a few things Atari hasn't had the time or
circumstance to learn about, just say so and we'll shut-up. Until then, I will
assume that Towns is passing along the information, doing his best to quote
the current company line (as he should) and some good will come out of it.
Conclusions? 1) Everyone agrees that the 68030/TT and ATW need to be
marketed under a new, non-Atari up-scale name. My example was the
Panasonic/Technics success; I also like the example of Honda/Acura and other
car companies with up-scale brand names. 2) The after-market support is
critical to the success of a Unix machine or transputer; Atari needs a co-
operative established software/support company to jump in head first with them
from day one. I don't think they have the time to hire and train a support
staff like they have done with the development staff. 3) The price point is
not the significant factor for Atari to stand on. The current pricing from
Sun, HP, DEC and others was not expected when the TT was first conceived. Time
for a new game plan. 4) Do all the above soon! (before new factors come
along.)
John <hoping for the best> DeMar
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 54 Tue Jun 27, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 18:51 EDT
I admit that Sigs comments offended me. Sorry Atari, I'm not going to be a
cheerleader unless you give me something to cheer about. Us developers have
put everything on the line for a very long time, and Atari shows us little
concern.
For example, Sig says don't be negative, yet I hear that the Dearborn show
wasn't advertised as much as planned because Atari didn't put up the co-op
money it promised. If that's true it sounds like the same old Atari to me.
I hope you've seen a real change, Holly, and that your sales are good
(considering the summer). I don't like what the distributors are telling me
at all. They say Atari dealer sales are way down, and business is bad.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 55 Wed Jun 28, 1989
HS [Holly] at 00:24 EDT
Maybe time to move this thread to 18...
Mark, we probably aren't breaking any sales records so far this summer, but
we're not dying on the vine either, which is good news, I guess. We're not a
big store, so we can't afford too big of a slump. Our favorite distributor
also said that it's slow, but that everything is slow... and it generally is
slower in summer. We had already figured that part out fortunately. :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 56 Wed Jun 28, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 10:45 EDT
That's good news Holly. Actually I checked into this months sales yesterday.
It took extra effort, but this month was far better than last, was actually a
pretty good month.
Summertime is slower. It's the perfect opportunity for Atari to get it
together. But if they wait until the fall it will be too late.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 57 Wed Jun 28, 1989
GORDON at 15:12 EDT
You have to remember Towns is the guy who said the STacy would be on sale in
the dealer near you on June 15th! At the WA show they did not even have a pre
production model! (That was June 25th)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 58 Wed Jun 28, 1989
GORDON at 15:13 EDT
Holly who do you think is closer to the truth, Towns or QMI???
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 59 Wed Jun 28, 1989
HS [Holly] at 15:40 EDT
Well, quite honestly, Gordon, in my eyes, QMI has very little creditability.
I have a real problem trusting anything from a company that promises via Email
and over the phone for 3 months to send you something as simple as literature
so maybe you can sell their product for them, yet never does it. At least when
Towns has told me he'd send me something, he's done it. But, the point that
you missed is that it seems to me that John would certainly have access to
more complete and more accurate information about sales figures than a company
whose products failed to make headway in the ST market for whatever reason,
like perhaps shipping a year late or so...
Your mileage may vary, but that's what things look like from where I'm
sitting.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 60 Wed Jun 28, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] at 18:08 EDT
This does belong in 18 but I must say that sales figures are just speculation
and perhaps Atari wants them to be that??? I give up trying to figure it out.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 61 Thu Jun 29, 1989
TOWNS at 02:26 EDT
I refuse to get involved in this discussion any further. I stand
behind what I have said here and have nothing to add to it.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 62 Thu Jun 29, 1989
QMI at 13:05 EDT
Holly,
I assumed you received the information long ago. CSS and Triangle Elec
carry DeskCart and ST-Talk Pro. This isn't the topic to discuss QMI's sales
and future... we're trying to analyze the current state of affairs at Atari
and where they will be going with the ST/TT. As one of the last Atari dealers
in the U.S. (and a relatively new one), you have the right to feel defensive
at whomever who can take a shot at. The sales figures I've estimated are based
on the number of dealers left who are willing to carry Atari ST products (not
just QMI products).
So, as this topic says: What about the TT? Well, to make sure I wasn't off
in left field with my ideas about marketing the TT, I passed the idea by a few
people. One of them is a purchasing agent for a large university, a couple of
them are senior engineers and managers for General Electric, and another is a
partner in a consulting engineering firm. Given the estimated price and
specification of an 'Atari Un*x workstation', I asked if they would consider
purchasing one or recommending one. The answer was unanimously: no. Then,
hypothestically, if the computer was marked with a new brand name and support
could be found through normal channels (Un*x software houses, high-end
resellers), they said either: sounds like it would be competitive; or we'll
get one and compare it to HP's, Sun's and MacII's we have.
It has to do mostly with making a comfortable, safe decision. Most people
aren't willing to take a chance with their business, or their job or their
reputation by recommending a name which is associated with games. If it's a
home computer, people are either buying a dedicated game machine or a PC-
compatible (again, the safe decision). There will always be a few people
willing to shop for the best equipment purely by technical criteria... I don't
think those people make a big enough crowd to market to for either the low end
or high end. Some heavy (ie: expensive) marketing and advertising is needed to
change the way people think.
JD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 63 Fri Jun 30, 1989
HS [Holly] at 00:12 EDT
I was asked who I believed more, and I answered given my experience with both
companies. No "shots" were intended. As stated it was my view based on my
experiences. (But as a side note, I don't see how you could have thought I
received the material when my last message to you, after numerous others,
stated that I was no longer interested in your products because I didn't feel
that a company that could not even make literature available was going to be
able to support their products.)
In any respect, there is at least one new dealer in this area (Kokomo, to be
exact), and another who is looking to set up shop. In addition, we've been in
business over a year, so I hardly thinks that makes us one of the more recent.
However, I agreed with whomever suggested the idea a while ago that the TT and
the ATW (and possibly the entire computer line) would benefit from being
marketed under a subdivision name. On the other hand, I have recently been
talking to some of the folks at the university here, and there seems to be no
small amount of interest in the new machines, even (and perhaps especially)
right down to Stacy. The Portfolio has perhaps made people take a second
glance towards Atari, and perhaps if Atari Corp can follow up with several
successful releases in a row, credibility can once again be renewed. That
issue was, I believe, heavy on the minds of many dealers I spoke to at WOA.
The TT does indeed have some capabilities that might set it apart, and,
hopefully, above other machines.
Do I think it will happen? Yes, but unfortunately not in the way I wish it
would. Deadlines being what they generally are in this business, I wouldn't
plan on seeing the TT's release here until mid-1990. I'd like nothing more
than to have Atari Corp make a liar out of me on it, but I'm not holding my
breath. But I also think it will end up being released under the Atari
label... which, if released on time, may or may not be a mistake. A bang-up
job on the TT could mean renewed interest in the rest of the computer line.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 64 Fri Jun 30, 1989
S.NOAH at 00:03 PDT
With all the talk about new machines going on, perhaps we should ask
ourselves where all of these new machines are going to be built. This isn't a
new question, but it is a timely one. As far as I know Atari is still
operating only one producion facility, the plant in Taiwan. Will this facility
be able to satisfy the production requirements entailed in developing all
these new devices ( eg. ATW, TT, STacy, portable game machine, etc. ).
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 65 Fri Jun 30, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 11:48 EDT
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Atari was selling 3-5K machines a month. I
don't think it's much less (or else we have a large market share!) but I don't
think it's much higher either. I do know that Atari's production was low last
year, and that they increased early this year. I don't have any idea on if
more machines are being shipped or warehoused though.
I think naming the TT (or whatever) "Atari" would be the curse of death
though. Maybe it would have worked if they did a better job on the ST.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 66 Fri Jun 30, 1989
HS [Holly] at 15:02 EDT
Mark,
I think you said it to me elsewhere when you noted that when the ST first
came out, it looked as if it would be the next messiah. The machine was good,
solid and at a great price. If Atari had run with it then, I don't think it
would have been touchable. Unfortunately, I don't think the TT has the same
technological quickstart that the ST had, so Atari really does have their
work cut out for them.
S.NOAH... the new game machine only carries the Atari name, I believe, and is
not actually manufactured by Atari Corp. Hmmm... I wonder if Atari could farm
out the manufacturing on the other equipment since they lack a US facility.
Interesting point made.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 67 Fri Jun 30, 1989
GORDON at 15:03 EDT
Last I heard the Portfolio and the P Game Machine are going to be made in
Japan. (contracted out)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 68 Fri Jun 30, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:13 EDT
I personally don't believe that having the Atari name on either the TT or the
ATW will affect interest. They are both reported to be very powerful machines
with features that set them apart from others. Look how many times articles
appear about the Amiga being used in video production work. And it is obvious
to everyone that it is a Commodore. I believe it is more the other way around,
that the ATW and the TT will bring greater recognition and prominance to the
Atari name. The real key for the ATW in particular is what kind of software
will appear to exploit its capabilities. There just aren't that many top
parallel programmers to go round. Although, I think most would jump at the
chance to work with a low-cost (market relative) parallel machine such as the
ATW. Hopefully, the TT won't be tied to a 16MHz 68030. I feel that would be
a mistake. Something along the lines of a 25MHz version would be better to
place it in the front running. Be nice to see both with built-in GENLOCK.
Considering the displays, this is something many people would be interested
in. As far as I know, the Atari market is still aimed at the Home/Personal
market, primarily. This market requires greater flexibility and more features
than the Professional/Business market coming right out of the box. After all,
I don't think you'll see Sun putting MIDI ports on their workstations any time
soon. It's about time we started to see systems that will remain on most if
not all of the day, handling different aspects of household control (such as
security) without keeping the owner from playing a game or writing a letter
(or new song).
I think the main point I babbling about is that you can't go to a university
or business and say, "Do you think you'll buy one of Atari's new machines?"
before the machines are out. If you had suggested to most of the engineers
that are now using Mac II's that they use an Apple for some of the things the
Mac II is being applied to before it was out, they probably would have
laughed. (And I have a good feeling that the Atari machines will look pretty
impressive next to the Mac II's, especially at half the price.)
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 69 Fri Jun 30, 1989
WHITESTR at 19:54 PDT
John D., your 'on the street' interviews sound like they reflect
actuality. However, I'm wondering just what price you suggested
the TT will go for. Herein lies the crux of whether the TT will
sell a 100,000 or 10,000 (at least initially.)
As someone looking to be able to do sophisticated art work and
visual processing, I know that built in ability to run TOS is quite
meaningless to me. And the Atari name is a definite minus (guess I
don't really expect corporate patterns to change with the TT...just isn't
a serious _enough_ machine.) If I have to spend $4-5000 for a base
unit with monitor, I will invest in a product which has a large base
of third-party developers (talking hardware here as much as software...)
Or, I'll intelligently look at how rapidly the market of Un!x stations
is dropping into an attitude of _real_ power without the price and purchase
for a little more an expandable RISC based system which isn't limited
to a rather paltry 256 colors on screen at once. After all, if I can
purchase an ATW from England this week for $8500 with quality monitor,
then I'm likely going to be able to purchase one later this year, when
(or if) the TT becomes available, for more like $6000 in the US. Why in
the world, given the fact that the ATW has tremendously more potential
than the TT, would I buy the lesser machine at only a 25-33% price
differential? Furthermore, (I'm registered developer #549, and joined
in over a year ago) there are hundreds of developers working on ATW
products _now_....Tim King (main partner of Perihelion Software and author
of Helios) visited us last year and from his accounts, the software
being successfully worked on for the ATW is 'beyond awesome'.
Now all of this changes radically if the TT is brought in with a nifty
but resolution-limited monitor (kinda like the ST, eh?) for *under*
$2500. In fact, if Atari markets the base unit without hd or monitor
for $1995...well, heh, I think these things will really take. Figure
in a little discounting and I think alot of ST people will be looking
to upgrade. Sell it to that slice of the education market which is
being forced to look at price as a prime consideration and I think the
*Atari* name will soon be seen as a positive once more (:)
Dai
p.s. I think that pushing for a 'name change' on either the TT ("you mean
the upgrade to the Atari ST?") or the Atari Transputer Workstation
(now selling in countries where that is a quite respectable name)
is barking up the wrong tree. Power Without the Price, is, from
my view, the WHOLE ISSUE.
p.s.s.John, thought I'd mention that my partners and I have been using
ST-Talk since it came out (and Pro, of course). We never touch
any other telecomm app.! Hope you do as nice of work on the next
machines...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 70 Sat Jul 01, 1989
P.MCCULLOUGH at 01:28 EDT
Atari's name could be on it- fine print on back of unit. Also, make the box
easily accessable (open arch.) and upgradeable- the biggest short-comings of
the ST/Mega line. John- didn't mean to offend by suggesting TT marketing, I
just think its time to "retire" some ST models (520ST, Mega 2- my CPU- no
favoritism here!) and to move the others into different niches. As things
stand, the proposed (Truly speculated-) prices of the TT will conflict on the
small Mega ST4 market. I do think that Atari's DTP package is brilliant- but
no one but Atari dealers and users know it exists. And the TT will boot :-)
the Mega ST4 out of DTP if just for its speed increase. One thing that I have
come to realize is that Atari isn't the only computer manufacturer climbing
the MAC/IBM mountain- Commodore is in BIG trouble right now. Local papers
(S. Jersey) recently reported that CBM suffered a 20+ point drop on the
American Stock Exchange- also, Amiga mags are beginning to grumble about the
revolving door at Commodore. (ie. Constant departures/arrivals of new
employees!) Sound familiar. Granted, Amiga is a stronger seller, but not a
devastator. I was also surprised to catch some disatisfaction over Amiga
models- evidently, people are grumbling that they want a less bulky model then
the 2000, but with the same power. Some are also complaining of over
saturation of the Amiga market. It is heartening to to see Atari making modest
gains and oddly, I have noticed a slow but steady increase in ST only stores
here in the Delaware valley. None of these were around a year ago when I was
searching desparately for a place to buy a Mega! One more note- Electronics
Boutique has evidently, for the 2nd time dropped the Amiga hard/software line.
Makes room for ST? TT?? ATW??? NAH! I do agree with others that the TT/ATW
systems should sell thru the professionals. Perhaps a non-business TT (Call
it ST-II or ST+) say in a Mega frame with say 2 megs for us poor folks could
be introduced? PVM
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 71 Fri Jun 30, 1989
S.NOAH at 23:09 PDT
Why not just produce the TT as an OEM UNIX BOX for computer stores ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 72 Sat Jul 01, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 15:44 MDT
Just so everyone is aware, a new ATW section has just been added!!! it is
topic 38 in this catagory! Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 73 Sat Jul 01, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 19:30 MDT
You all are talking like you *ACTUALLY* expect Atari to sell the TT in the
present configuration in the near future!! I would be very surprised to see
the TT before 1990, and then it will probably have a propretiary non-
expandable (aka Mega ST) buss that no one else will ever support!! Get real,
and just go out and buy a Mac IIX now!!! I can't see what the mythical TT is
supposed to have that you can't already get in a Mac IIX!!! And you get
support from Apple, which anyone has to say is better then the non-existent
support from Atari (I mean 2 years just to update the TOS ROMs???). Just some
thoughts from a person who still likes his two STs!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 74 Sat Jul 01, 1989
G.E.M. at 20:50 PDT
One thing the 'mythical' TT will have is a MUCH lower price tag than the
Macintrash.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 75 Sun Jul 02, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 10:23 MDT
G.E.M.
but will it have the third vendor support that the Mac enjoys?? I mean,
the Macs already have a CD ROM full of over 400 megs of PD Mac sw.
but, TOAD COMPUTERS is already selling a 44 meg removable hard drive,
for the ST, so there is some hope for ST third vendors out there!!
Did anyone check the statement from Sig Hartman at the WOA show that the TT
would be out by then end of the year, or he would quit?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 76 Sun Jul 02, 1989
QMI at 14:15 EDT
If anyone has captured the "TT" topic on Usenet, could you upload it to me?
G.E.M.
Calling the Mac "the Macintrash" is rediculous and lowers the seriousness
of our discussions. (Just because I can't afford a Ferrari, I don't call it
junk! But I do call my Oldsmobile nasty names every day!). The price of a Mac
reflects the unbelievable amount of support they offer to all segments of
their business. They have more employees than all of Atari US just to handle
the education market, for instance.
The MacIIcx will soon have a standard speed of 25MHz and by the time Atari
releases the TT, the industry will be at 30Mhz as a standard. More
importantly, RISC-based computers are coming down in price and are better
performers at 20MHz than a 68030 would be at several times the speed. I have
to assume that Atari will inevitably release the TT within a year and that the
price/features will be fairly close to the generally known description. These
assumption are based on knowing the time it would take to change the design
plans and the urgency of getting this product out in order for Atari to stay
in the running.
Current trends show that the "Power without the Price" way of doing business
(in the US anyways) doesn't work anymore. It's far more complicated than that,
with marketing methods being the most important. It would take forever to list
all of the factors and cost of doing it right is astronomical. Atari could
find a niche or two (as with MIDI on the ST) and sell quite a few TT's, but
the computer would never make it as a mainstream brand name without a
different name and all of the marketing/support etc.
JD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 77 Sun Jul 02, 1989
WHITESTR at 19:15 PDT
JD--since you've brought up the concept of complexity, perhaps I'll add
some notes regarding current marketing theory.
The information industry does not operate according to old theories
of 'diminishing returns'. The complexity involved with the pool of
information consumers is in fact *so* great, as to lend itself
mathematically and practically to a model of 'chaos'. Not to get
too snooty or abstract here, 'cause this stuff is lived as much in
Jack T.'s gut as it is in theorist's heads, but put squarely, it is
now understood that price/power/recognition of a given product can
literally 'snap' a market in totally unforeseen ways (<--read not
figured out through an analysis of 'diminishing returns'.)
To see the marketing of the TT in terms of very specific niche needs
is not to see it in terms of how it _is_ going to be marketed...to
the MASSES. Once the product has disrupted the field (and disruption
is a must) it _geometrically_ gains 'dominance' as the presense and
urgency of the product draws that attention which would otherwise be
attracted to another 'disruptor'. War in this field exists in a
context of instigated catastrophe, be that in specific niches or
specific societies. Advertising truly counts (propaganda is a must),
and there is a terrific amount of strength in the common-man position
of Power Without the Price. That one stance is good for a whole lot
of disruption, which is why the US computer establishment so shuns
even the mentioning of Jack Tramiel and the Atari Corporation.
The information business, addressing as it does the human intellect,
is premised on the intuition of 'increasing returns', not diminishing
ones, and Atari Corp. still shows signs of realizing that.
Le'on
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 78 Mon Jul 03, 1989
T.ONDERS [Tim Onders] at 23:58 EDT
One must also realize that, while the 'TT' will be partially aimed at the
market niche presently filled by the Macintosh II-whatevers, it will be more
closely matched with much stiffer competition, such as Sun, NeXT, and SGI.
The 'TT' is supposed to be a Unix box, which is something the Mac II does not
do particularly well (AUX is not terribly plesant). With the Sun 3/60 down
under $10K, and the SparcStation around $15K, the NeXT at $10K commercial, the
SGI Personal Iris starting at $12K, and 386i's for under $8K, Atari will be
entering a fierce market. The biggest danger, as I see it, is from Sun; a
company that will do anything to sell their systems. Unless the 'TT' is
particularly impressive, or particularly inexpensive, is probably will not do
well.
-Tim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 79 Tue Jul 04, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:32 EDT
But at the price of software for a Sun and for peripherals, I think there will
be plenty of room for the Atari machine. The great thing about Atari's
position in this area is that even more so than the Mac II (which I think
greatly surprised Sun) it will be ignored by the competition until it captures
a greater share of the market than expected. Sun is shifting their marketing
to compete with Mac II, I'll doubt they'll want to shift again to combat
Atari. Given the features reported for the TT and believing there may be a
few more surprises thrown in, I think Atari should be able to grab a
significant piece of the market. Remembering also that Atari is better
positioned to move quickly into the personal computer niche with the TT
(something Sun might find difficult or even ignore) and this machine will
surely be what people will soon expect from a personal computer. I hope there
are lots of great features because I think personal computing has the most
fascinating drive and I want to see what that share of the market can do with
such a machine. I think the price is workable even if it may appear a little
high to the Atari community. I have met more and more people who are laying
down $2k-$3k for personal systems. Take a look at what it REALLY costs to put
together an 8-bit Atari system (monitor, drive and all) and it starts to look
pretty silly next to an ST. There seems to be a minimal price point of about
$500 to $800 (discounted) to put together a system. Faster chips and memory
do not appear the real base, but things like monitors, drives and keyboards.
Anyway, I'm still looking forward to the TT and feel it has a very viable
chance for success. (I do feel a 25MHZ or better processor will give it a
longer lifespan.)
-Craig W. Daymon
P.S. R.COVERT1, Your comment about an Atari specific bus doesn't hold with
any reports given on the TT. All reports indicate a VME
bus, the standard on Unix microprocessor systems.
(Besides, wasn't the Apple bus specific to the Mac II?)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 80 Tue Jul 04, 1989
TOWNS at 21:11 EDT
Yes, Craig.. The Mac II uses NuBus. Not VME from what I have
heard. As to what the TT will contain, I do not know.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 81 Tue Jul 04, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 20:09 MDT
C.DAYMON,
The MacII uses a MODIFIED NuBus, not a true NuBus. For one thing, the Mac II
NuBus isn't as fast as a real nubus. The Atari could make a great market for
itself if it has a FAST (30 megahertz) bus to do fast video graphics. As for
the bus in the TT, even John Townsend keeps repeating that the TT 's buss was
never announced. So, who knows if it will be a real VME buss (a great thing if
true) or some bastardized kludge of a buss (aka the Mega ST buss). I would
LOVE to buy a TT, simply for the better graphics, but knowing how slow Atari
is to provide support (still waiting for a working flow control version of TOS
1.4), I don't have a lot of faith in Atari much these days. Hopefully, Atari
will prove me wrong and the TT will be wonderful!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 82 Wed Jul 05, 1989
P.MCCULLOUGH at 00:42 EDT
Actually the MAC IIx machines (x here standing for any number of models in
this distended family-) are very nice if one has no problem spending
truckloads of greenbacks. But if I had those bucks, I'd buy a Sun anything
over the Scottish fruit any day. The Sun systems are going to do serious
damage to the high end Mac II family. The TT really has no competition
(Especially since it doesn't exist as yet in anything other then prototype
model-) in its price/market. It'll probably go head to head with Commodore
(Assuming Commodore can keep alive after its massive stock dives and sales
losses of late- wonder what's going on over there anyway). The other problem
with the Mac systems in general are Apple's marketing them as "serious"
competition to IBM. Please, get real. The only problem is that if the
speculation is correct on the TT price tag (And there's no reason to assume it
is) I think the TT will be a difficult sale. Atari needs computer sales in
some really BIG business market with BIG visibility
if it hopes to sell TTs there. It would be nice if Atari tried donating STs
to schools- when students learn on a system, they stick with it. But the fact
remains that business has always been, and probably will continue to be Big
Blue domain. PVM
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 83 Wed Jul 05, 1989
GORDON at 14:38 EDT
I think the TT will be VERY aggressivly priced. The question is will UNIX
people buy a low priced machine that does not have the hand holding and
support they are used to????
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 84 Wed Jul 05, 1989
C.DAYMON at 22:42 EDT
I think there are a GREAT number of Unix people that are waiting for a low
(moderately) priced Unix machine and I don't (although I hope it's there)
think lack of support will stop them. As the ST market is filled with people
ready and willing to tear open their machines to try some tempting mod, so
there are a great many Unix people using accelorated AT class machines. I
know one guy that has 3 such systems running in his house. They are also
people that after getting a TT (Unix) box at home would be very apt to push it
into the work environment. (In which most of them are using/administrating
Unix systems.) There is a big market for such a machine, the key is that
Atari should NOT ignore the very large market associated with support for Unix
machines sold to businesses/universities. After all, they would just charge
for answering questions (after some initial free support period) and this
would keep them up on things in-house to better support and enhance future
products.
I think the VME bus was mentioned in the Atari Explorer issue that talked
about the TT. This, even though it hasn't always been, should be one
publication that accurately reports information on Atari products. It's easy
enough to check.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 85 Thu Jul 06, 1989
HS [Holly] at 00:58 EDT
Gordon,
If dealers are selling the TT, a company might well get the kind of hand-
holding they're used to. It will depend on the dealer.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 86 Wed Jul 05, 1989
G.E.M. at 22:11 PDT
Regarding the bus structure. If Atari really wants to make a mark, the TT
should support not only the VME bus, but Future bus as well.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 87 Thu Jul 06, 1989
WHITESTR at 07:15 PDT
Gordon, when you mention expected handholding (bet you some guys
would get a bit peeved at that comment, true or not) are you refering
to end-user or developer? I'm thinking that if Atari slaps on a GUI
(X.desktop possibly??) and works on porting some popular apps so that
they are compatible, handholding becomes no more a need, neccessarily,
than on the ST. For developers, well, that's another story.
Le'on
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 88 Thu Jul 06, 1989
GORDON at 14:56 EDT
Actually what I was refering to was the simple fact that you do not go to the
local store and purchase a Sun workstation. A TRAINED salesman from SUN
visits you, sells you the computer and makes sure you know how to use it. He
also makes sure things like what happened on here recently do not happen (a
computer was lost in repair for 6 months). Its just a different approach. I
think everyone here will admit that Atari is not at the top of the list for
prompt efficient customer service.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 89 Thu Jul 06, 1989
QMI at 16:39 EDT
Gordon,
SUN's *ARE* being sold through computer stores now... thru the CompterLand
chain. It takes a special type of dealer, though, and just about all of the
Atari dealers (that are left) would not have the resources to handle the
support needed for a UN*X machine. With the lower prices on the Sun ws's, they
aren't making those individual sales visits like they used to do. With this
new low end approach, it will make it harder for anyone to compete with Sun.
Le'onm
I agree that a graphical user interface is a MUST for the un*x side of the
TT... or any lower-priced workstation. I hope Atari is talking with a company
who will license a well-known working environment to be included with the base
computer.
From everything I have heard, it looks like the TT will be priced very
closely to an equivalent Sun machine. Sounds like a critical problem and worth
at least a few 'choas-theory-styled' board meetings!
JD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 90 Thu Jul 06, 1989
BREHBOCK at 22:13 CDT
There are a lot of aggressive VARS out there that are doing quite well with
the Everex Step (TM) series, and the TT would fit in that niche rather well.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 91 Thu Jul 06, 1989
M.MCCANN2 at 23:44 EDT
I think I must disagree with the contention that Atari is bad at customer
service. Recently my color monitor died and I sent it from here (east coast)
to there and it was back in exactly 3 weeks. I was, to be frank, shocked. I
was told to expect 6-8 weeks, which I was truly expecting (as in, 6 at best).
Three was simply outstanding. Of course, being able to take it in for repair
locally would be faster still, BUT as that will probably not be possible till
the 1 millionth or so ST is sold in the US (IF THEN, around HERE), this WAS a
quick and reasonable alternative... By the way, it was a Goldstar, and the
flyback was melted, after 2 years' use. These things happen...too bad I can't
get a Goldstar flyback or I'd still have it.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 92 Thu Jul 06, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 22:07 MDT
Of course this is all pure speculation, as Atari has never even admitted
publicly that the TT exists, or when it will ship. Just ask John Townsend.
John keeps repeating that nothing can be said about the TT until it is
released. So, who really knows what it will be like. To back this up, think
back about 3 years, and remember what features the Blitter chip was supposed
to have. And look at the Blitter that was released. IT Only has about half the
features that Atari said it was supposed to have. So, I don't believe anything
about the TT until it is released. Until then, Atari can change from the VME
buss to one of their own design if they so choose.
This is not to say that I don't want one, because I do!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 93 Fri Jul 07, 1989
GRIBNIF at 23:23 EDT
What I think Atari needs to do, in addition to the TT with all of its
features and ports and doo-dahs is release a lower end 68030 like Apple
has done with the SE 68030.
This would be a Mega 4 with a 68030 and the higher resolutions of the TT.
Correctly priced to fit between the TT and the Mega 4. Of course, I doubt
Atari would do this.
I would also recommend the release of a Mega 1 to dealers for $1,199-mono
and $1,399 color and adding it to the Mega dealer line.
Then take the 1040ST and release it mass-market. (Discontinue the 520ST
or release it mass-market too).
This would allow a 1Meg machine to go mass market and get better sales and
such, while allowing dealers to still carry a 1 Meg low priced machine
that only they have.
I also think they should take the Moniterm and their present $4,000
Mega 4 DP package, bundle it with Calamus and release a Moniterm DP
Package for $5,999.95.
Pity I don't work for Atari...
Rick
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 94 Sat Jul 08, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 14:58 MDT
As far as Apple having better costumer support than Atari, well they have more
resources, but I have heard many people complain about the costomer service
that Apple has. I have also heard many complain (I am one who does) about
the buggyness and the amount of systems they keep releasing. I have run
systems that over a period of time become unstable and use more and more ram,
and no one can explain it. I have worked with many different Macs, and if
you told a service person about the errors I have gotten, he would say that's
impossable. At least the STs errors are predicatable! And I have talked to
Apple users who say for over a year that Apple has been promising a laptop
mac, well where is it? Now as far as releasing the STs for mass marketing, do
you mean sell them at Sears, I hope not. If Atari sells computers at Sears,
noone will even take the ATW seriously! I mean that Atari can sell 8-bits at
Sears with only minor damage to their name, but when they sell 16-bit
computers through Sears, noone will take their 16-bit computers seriously.
Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 95 Sat Jul 08, 1989
DMAY [Student] at 18:46 EDT
The summer is a rather slow for customer returns since most of the problems
arise during the XMAS season from all those video game systems.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 96 Mon Jul 10, 1989
WLR at 01:29 PDT
Basically, I think Atari's TT will fail in the marketplace because as
computers get more expensive and buyers get more vertically based with the
third party software and hardware availibilty and support being as important
or more important than the computer itself a high-end computer from Atari who
has been established as neither here nor there to third party
manufactors/companies.
Atari's customers have been, in the past, willing to wait for software to meet
their needs to come onto the marketplace. People that buy computers that cost
4K plus know exactly what software to buy and will NOT wait for dreamy
promises from anyone like many early Mac/ST & Amiga users did.
I mean would you buy a TT for a certain application, pay the big bucks and sit
and wait for a third party to develop it. Some might say well the machine is
backward compatable-- if that is true then the buyer would buy the cheaper
machine nor the TT.
Worse, Atari no longer has a upgradeable loyal user base. Atari also cannot
play the "Power without the Price" game. Reason: Unlike the ST verses the old
Mac where the ST was twice the machine for half the price the TT will be about
the same machine for about 2/3 the price when in the marketplace to WOW! a
buyer it would NOW have to be four times the machine at half the price. THAT
is why the TT will do a piddle of business in the U.S.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 97 Mon Jul 10, 1989
GORDON at 13:52 EDT
QMI.
John where did you hear that the TT was going to be the same price as a SUN.
I heard it was going to be real cheap!!!
As far as a Graphical User Interface. Atari has GEM and GDOS!!
(sound of Gordon ducking)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 98 Mon Jul 10, 1989
C.DAYMON at 23:18 EDT
There is also a version of GEM that runs under Unix (via X-Windows) and since
the TT will run Unix, there should be plenty of powerful software very fast.
Over 20 years of Unix must mean there is some good stuff out there that will
show up almost immediately for the TT. Besides, there are a great many very
good ST programs that will surely shine running on the TT. (Any DTP program,
DynaCAD, LDW Power, Touch-Up,...) This machine DOES have a market RIGHT NOW!
The ATW also has a market, but may be slightly slower to develope because of
the limited number of programmers experienced with parallel computing.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 99 Tue Jul 11, 1989
LEN-F at 01:28 EDT
I can't imagine that the TT or the ATW (come on, let's get some catchy,
palatable names for these machines!!!!!!) will succeed in the marketplace
given the ATROCIOUS way Atari treats dealers and their REDICULOUS AVERSION to
advertising. It is a shame that the fate of these fine machines is in the
hands of such seemingly incompetent businesspeople!
LEN F
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 100 Tue Jul 11, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 11:42 EDT
Gordon, I think John was refering to Atari's track record of bringing out a
machine at more than they expected (let alone later than expected).
Two years ago they were saying "under 5000". A lot has happened since then,
and SUn machines are _much_ cheaper now.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 101 Wed Jul 12, 1989
BREHBOCK at 00:52 CDT
Rick, I say we (Atari Owners/Retailers/Developers) all buy up a bunch of Atari
stock, and start kind of an ESOP, but it would be an O-SOP: Owner-Stock-
Ownership-Plan! Ok-ok, you can be CEO :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 102 Sat Jul 15, 1989
R.GRIDLEY [Rick] at 09:22 EDT
A lot of companies, smaller ones, would be inticed by a Unix/TT system that
could use 520ST's as smart terminals in the TT network. Low cost and high
power for said network could be a real plus in selling.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 103 Sat Jul 15, 1989
TOWNS at 15:38 EDT
Point well taken..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 104 Sun Jul 16, 1989
S.NOAH at 01:53 PDT
If the TT is indeed going to support Unix and X-Windows, has anyone given any
thought to creating an X-Windows terminal program for the ST ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 105 Sun Jul 16, 1989
TOWNS at 15:40 EDT
I think one already Exists..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 106 Sun Jul 16, 1989
C.DAYMON at 22:29 EDT
There's probably a few in the Unix public domain.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 107 Tue Jul 18, 1989
K.BAD [S/W Engine] at 21:33 EDT
An X-terminal is not that easy to implement, I seriously doubt that there are
any useable PD ones.
And I think John's right - I believe one X-ists ;-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 108 Tue Jul 18, 1989
G.E.M. at 22:46 PDT
If the TT implements X-Windows, it better use X11. That's the new standard.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 109 Wed Jul 19, 1989
C.DAYMON at 22:18 EDT
I relatively sure that the code for X-Windows is PD via MIT, so I doubt that
Atari would go with anything less than the latest version. (Besides, I think
X11 has been around for a while now.) A better question is whether Atari is
planning support of Motif or Open Look. Seems like Motif is winning and from
the pictures, it looks better. Anybody know functionally which may be
stronger? A machine like the TT may well be able to SET the next standard if
they choose wisely. (Considering the lower planned price than other competing
machines.) Have there been any talks with Pixar about porting RasterMan? (To
the ATW also.)
-Craig W. Daymon
P.S. Latest trade journals report Motif is due to ship very soon. I do
hate the idea that IBM has a claw in it, but it does seem to have
support.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 110 Wed Jul 19, 1989
K.BAD [S/W Engine] at 23:24 EDT
As far as I know, we have not settled on a user interface standard for the
Unix version of TT. It seems more important for us to wait for the dust to
clear among the competing X user interface standards. We do have a "standard"
graphical shell that will be shipped with the thing, though.
ttfn...
(*ken @ atari*)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 111 Wed Jul 19, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 23:49 MDT
oh wow!! Ken you really shouldn't talk about the TT in public!! You *know*
that the TT has never been officially announced!! You are gonna get into
trouble with Sam T if you aint careful!! But, we all here want to know more!!
What is the graphical shell?? Multi-tasking TOS??
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 112 Wed Jul 19, 1989
S.NOAH at 23:07 PDT
If an X-terminal program for the ST X-ists, it might be a nice idea for Atari
to mention it as part of any future "TT" sales literature. If they could sell
STs ( even 520 without drives could be used if the program was on a cartrige )
as remote terminals for the TTs. They could thus offer a total multiuser Unix
system with a graphic interface. Something like this could be a nice package
for a small or medium sized business.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 113 Thu Jul 20, 1989
TOWNS at 03:04 EDT
Hmm, that is a good idea. I will pass it along to the marketing gurus
here at Atari.
And yes, Ken.. what are you trying to do! Get us all in trouble? :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 114 Thu Jul 20, 1989
DOUG.W [ST*SYSOP] at 03:14 EDT
I think the biggest problem with X-Windows would be memory requirements. If I
remember right, X-Windows requires around 2 Megs, without any programs
running. Also, to get any speed out of it, you would probably have to by-pass
TOS entirely (MT-C Shell is just bearable, and it doesn't have any windowing,
and VSH Manager is UNBEARABLY slow).
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 115 Thu Jul 20, 1989
S.NOAH at 23:08 PDT
Hmm... I don't know about the memory requirements for an X-terminal, 2 Megs
sounds like quite a bit though. Since we have a mixed environment at work ( 6
VAXs, an IBM Mainframe, 2 Microvaxs, and a couple of hundred P.C.s ) I get to
see a lot of networking literature. One thing I noticed quite a bit are
schemes to convert older P.C.s ( PC, XT ) for use as X-terminals. It's a good
idea, because of all the uses that these machines could be put to, this one
dosn't require any changes to the motherbaord. ( I must mention that there had
been proposals to upgrade these machines to 386 boards. ) Further, our service
vendor ( DEC ) will not work on machines if they have a non stock system
board. So, this idea gives new life and usefulness to these older machines.
P.S. Sorry that I digressed, I meant to say that If a 640k PC could be set up
as an X-terminal, I don't know why a 1Meg ST would have any problem doing the
same. P.P.S. Now all I have to do is try and convince someone to put DEC-
Windows up on one of the VAXs, even the Micro VAX would do, so that we could
test some of this out. Not likely, we can't even get approval to let the users
test Word Perfect. Were stuck supporting Mass(ive)-11 ( ...ugh ).
Stu
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 116 Fri Jul 21, 1989
DOUG.W [ST*SYSOP] at 04:06 EDT
I would suspect that a 640K X-Terminal could only support a subset of the
complete X-Windows system. The UNIX system I use has 8Megs of RAM, and after
starting the system (without X-Windows running), there is 4.4Megs free. After
starting X-Windows this drops to around 2.7Megs without any processes running.
--Doug
P.S. this is a 25Mhz 68030 machine.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 117 Fri Jul 21, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:44 EDT
8Megs down to 4.4 with just Unix? Sounds like a LOT of programs have been set
to be resident. (not paged) We have had Unix V.3 running on a 2Meg Motorola
system for over a year now with no problems. (Except for a few we inflicted
on ourselves in development.) Do you have a large cache?
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 118 Fri Jul 21, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:16 PDT
To be honest I don't know a lot about the workings of an X-terminal, but one
question does come to mind. When you load X-windows on your Unix system are
you then capable of supporting remote X-terminals on your machine ? This
feature, I would imagine, would take up a lot more of the system's resources
than the "terminal only" set up I had in mind. THe ST would be just a dumb
terminal ( in the same way as I am using mine for to enter this message, just
a more sophisticated one ).
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 119 Sun Jul 23, 1989
DOUG.W [ST*SYSOP] at 00:53 EDT
Good point. Yes, this machine is capable of supporting remote X-Terminals at
the same time.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 120 Sat Jul 22, 1989
S.WHITNEY at 22:11 PDT
About support... How about selling the TT cheap and then hiting a couple of
phone support people and _charging for support. Atari might even make a
profit as well as making their system competitive where support is required!
--Steve
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 121 Sun Jul 23, 1989
C.DAYMON at 16:39 EDT
Wow! An Atari '900' number! 1-900-FIXMYTT. Only $.50 a minute.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 122 Sun Jul 23, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 16:03 MDT
How much networking/multitasking will the TT be able to handle? i thought
that it was just an expensive and high level personal computer-like the Mac
II, and the ATW was the real networking beast. Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 123 Tue Jul 25, 1989
T.ONDERS [Tim Onders] at 19:44 EDT
DOUG:
An X-Windows terminal actually requires very little memory, not the two megs
that you quote. What an X-Windows terminal is, is simply the client end of X
running remotely from the server. The applications, Unix, and all of the
processing are done on a server chine, in this case a TT, and the X terminal
only displays the results. It does not take much processing power, since all
the terminal is doing is displaying graphics. It does, however, require 19.2K
bps connection, or ethernet.
Might I recommend that you read the july issue of Byte magazine? It has some
good information on Unix X interfaces and the Client-Server paradigm used by
X. (I think it was July)
-Tim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 124 Tue Jul 25, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:39 PDT
Thanks for the info on the July BYTE magazine, I guess now I have a reason to
renew our office subscription. About the baud rate or etherlink connect , has
anybody seen any of those parallel to etherlink adapters that are out for the
PC. Do you think that, with the right software, they might work on the ST. (
They are being sold as etherlink adapters for laptop PCs. )
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 125 Thu Jul 27, 1989
DOUG.W [ST*SYSOP] at 06:22 EDT
Hmm, I'll have to look at that BYTE. I guess I'm just used to an X-Windows
system which keeps separate bit-maps for each window and continues to update
them even if they are partially obscured by other windows, or even while they
are being dragged around the screen.
There's also a bunch of processing that must occur on the terminal if you do
it right, such as mouse handling, bit-blitting, high-speed line and text
graphics routines, etc.
Yes, you could do without much of this, but then what's the point?
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 126 Fri Jul 28, 1989
T.ONDERS [Tim Onders] at 20:02 EDT
Don't see why the RS-232 to Ethernet adapters could not be used with an ST,
but I would think the highest allowable throughput would be 19.2K.
Admitedly, an X terminal must do a bunch of graphics computing, but an ST
could handle that, especially without doing the applications processing.
-Tim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 127 Sat Jul 29, 1989
S.NOAH at 01:12 PDT
I found the article on the parallel to ethernet adapter, it was in InfoWeek (
April 17,89 ). The adapter is made by a company called Xircom, but is a
little bit pricey for the ST market ( $695 ). The Network access speed is said
to be 500 kbps on an AT class machine. The adapter comes in three
configurations, one for thin ( BNC ) Ethernet, one for Thick Ethernet ( with
an external tranceiver ), and one for twisted pair connection.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 128 Sat Jul 29, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 13:17 MDT
*********************************************************** I saw in my
current issue of STart, that the next issue (only a few days away) will have
an interview with Sam himself, and he will discuss the Stacy and the TT! Aric
Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 129 Sat Jul 29, 1989
C.DAYMON at 16:09 EDT
Boy! That will be a nice article. Now if the post office will get around to
delivering my August issue of STart, I can waite the month for the September.
(While the Sept. issue sits on the news stands.)
-CWD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 130 Sat Jul 29, 1989
SANDY.W [SysOp] at 17:38 EDT
Not to mention the lead times on articles....
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 131 Sun Jul 30, 1989
M.LOADER1 [Mike Loader] at 09:07 PDT
If Atari is hypothetically choosing between Motif and Open Look for its hypo-
thetical TT, then here's one vote for Open Look.
- Mike -
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 132 Sun Jul 30, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:55 EDT
Atari may very well be able to swing a good deal with AT&T over Open-Look due
to the way things are heading toward Motif. AT&T may be very willing to help
out with a machine that will place their interface in front of more people
than a standard workstation would. Sun might not go for it though.
Particularily if it starts to look like another Mac II to contend with.
-CWD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 133 Sun Jul 30, 1989
GRIBNIF at 23:09 EDT
The Atari Parallel port and a true IBM parallel port are very
different. The Xircom adapter will not work on the ST's more
limited parallel port. (Same reason why many of the PC-Link
adaptors that use the parallel port to link laptops to a desktop
computer wont work with PC-Ditto)
Rick
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 134 Mon Jul 31, 1989
S.NOAH at 00:24 PDT
Oh !
Never mind.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 135 Tue Aug 01, 1989
K.BAD [S/W Engine] at 23:51 EDT
AT&T wants a LOT LOT LOT of money for Open Look.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 136 Wed Aug 02, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:16 EDT
i thought I saw something in Unix Today! that said they had recently changed
that attitude. Since the majority seems to be favoring Motif, I think they
have had to rethink it. This is a VERY recent change. (Besides, those little
push-pins look interesting.)
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 137 Tue Aug 29, 1989
SLP at 07:55 EDT
In the latest issue of Computer Shopper, I noticed an Ethernet adapter for the
Mac that was a SCSI device. It could be part of a SCSI chain and was $495.
Probably could be used with the ST without much trouble. Now where was that
address:
Compatible Systems Co.
P.O. Drawer 17220
Boulder, CO 80308
(800) 356-0283
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 138 Wed Aug 30, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 23:48 MDT
There has been some talk on comp.sys.atari.st on USENET from Germany about the
new 68030 TT which was announced on the 25th. There are two sides that I have
seen. One is that the TT will be on par with the Mac IIx (the 16MHz Macintosh)
and the other is that because of bad hardware design the TT will be VERY slow
compared to other 68030 machines. It does seem that Atari is using a modified
VME buss, which uses only 24 address bit and only 16 data bits. This has been
confirmed by a guy in Germany who saw a demo TT. Also, the TT will use a
propretiary color monitor,so your NEC Multisync monitor won't run on the TT.
The release date was NOT announced, though it is expected that the TT will be
available by Christmas in Germany. No news of the TT in the States though.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 139 Thu Aug 31, 1989
DANSCOTT at 18:10 EDT
<SIGH>
No comment.....
<GRIN>
Dan/Atari Corp.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 140 Thu Aug 31, 1989
S.NOAH at 21:47 PDT
When can we expect to see an official Atari press release on the TT & STe ?
There are quite a few discrepancies in the various descriptions I've read,
this is especialy true of the STe.
One question that continues to bother me is .. Are the new graphics modes on
the STe and the TT the same ? I've read to many conflicting reports to be
sure of anything. Even the conference from last night didn't resolve all of
the discrepant reports. Please, could somebody at Atari post the Specs on
these machines before the rumours become more widespread than the reality.
Thanks,
Stu
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 141 Fri Sep 01, 1989
TOWNS at 01:10 EDT
I am not sure when I can get a press release online. As for your question
on video modes. Yes, they are the same. the STE modes are a subset of the
available TT modes.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 142 Fri Sep 01, 1989
K.BAD at 02:12 EDT
What John said about press releases. Until then, I've been given leave to
talk about TT "a bit" (whatever that means ;-) so I'll do my best to quell any
misinformation without getting myself in trouble with my boss (Leonard has a
tendency to get, um, upset sometimes ;-).
All the discussion in the world on Usenet is not going to mean a whole lot
until the people involved have actually _used_ TT's and have read the hardware
specs. The TT's hardware design is not going to make it slow WRT other 68030
machines - in fact there are some features of the TT which will make it much
faster than an "ST with a 68030." Even so, as far as compatibility is
concerned, the TT _is_ an "ST with a 68030," and a lot more enhancements. If
you're interested, I might be able to provide a few more specifics on the
hardware speed issues; for now, let's just say that some of the postings on
the nets have ranged from slightly erroneous to outright absurd.
The VME bus on the TT is not "modified" in any way - it is a standard
"Eurocard" format. Using the smaller cards in the first version of TT (the
one shown in Dusseldorf, called
"TT030/2" for now) has a big advantage in terms of cost reduction. We could
have wangled the "full sized" VME cards into a TT case, but it would have made
it considerably bigger, with considerably more complex hardware, and MUCH more
expen$ive. Atari delivers Power without the Price, remember?!
TT does not use a proprietary color monitor - any standard monitor capable
of displaying VGA graphics will be usable, with the proper adjustments for
screen aspect ratio. Currently in Sunnyvale, I have seen five or six
different kinds of monitors hooked up to TT's, including NEC MultiSync
monitors.
One other unfortunate bit of misinformation was put out at the Dusseldorf
show, and that is relative TT speed. In the original press release we sent to
Germany to be translated for the flyers handed out at the show, we stated that
the features of TT make for four times the memory bandwidth of the ST. That
means, _raw memory access_ in "dual purpose" RAM (that shared by video and
processor) is four times the speed of ST. HOWEVER, there is also an option
for "fast" nibble-mode RAM which is _not_ shared by video, and other hardware
factors make actual program execution speed as much as TEN TIMES as fast as on
ST.
Your mileage may vary.
ttfn...
(*ken @ atari*)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 143 Tue Aug 29, 1989
M.VEDERMAN2 (Forwarded)
More text from USEnet. Please remember, I am posting this as I captured it
from USEnet. I have not seen the TT, nor do I have any opinions regarding
the TT (although it does sound nice, I doubt it'll make it to the US market!)
OK, OK, so I do have some opinions! This retort to the previous posting
sounds pretty good. I especially like that it is TOS/GEM compatible!!
kBAD:
USEnet *is* good, in that we lowly peons in the United States (who apparently
get neglected by Atari Corp.) can at least find out how Atari treats the
'preferred' crowd overseas!!!
----------- BEGIN USEnet posting from SOMEONE ELSE ----------------------
Article 18025 (3 more) in comp.sys.atari.st:
From: atoenne@laura.UUCP (Andreas Toenne)
Subject: Re: Duesseldorf: personal impression of the TT(T)
Message-ID: <1572@laura.UUCP>
Date: 26 Aug 89 18:57:08 GMT
References: <8908251936.AA19454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: atoenne@laura.UUCP (Andreas Toenne)
Organization: Universitaet Dortmund
Lines: 92
OK,
don't believe everything you see or hear :-) :-0
I've been demoing the TT today and (prob.) tomorrow with Smalltalk80.
So please let me correct some mistakes and official :-) romours.
In article <8908251936.AA19454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> V61@DHDURZ1.BITNET
(Ronald L
amprecht) writes:
>-68030, 16MHz
>- VME slot (A24,D16)
>shared RAM for video and processor with an access time of 250ns
>- tiny ugly box with the old ST keyboard with it's famous function keys
>Price: appr. DM 5700 -- including 30MB Harddisk and color monitor
>(They said it wouldn't be sold without the Harddisk or the color monitor --
> no chance for a cheap upgrade)
Wrong.
What you saw was the 'complete' low-cost version.
Certainly there will be packages without harddrive. However the monitor
is somewhat special (close to VGA but not close enough) so good ones
like NEC multisync will work but result in a bad picture with thick
borders around.
It RUNS the old ST harddisks so you can get it cheaper than 6500DM incl.VAT
None at Atari is willing to give final statements about that though.
Leonard Tramiel said to me: 'Germain sales will determine the packages
(in Germany)'. So I'll stay optimistic.
>Seeing this I called it a TTT --- namely a Tic Tac Toe machine: You will
never
>loose something with respect to the old ST, but you have no chance to win
>a jackpot with it.
Ouch, Amiga owner?
>Actually I would call it a wastage of highly sophisticated microprocessors
>the way an 68030 is slowed down to 2MHz Busfrequency. A (A24,D16) VME slot
>that would have been something useful for the ST, but an 68030 should be
>worth an full 32bit VME slot ! A speedupfactor of 4 that's a shame and I'm
>quite sure the TT will be the slowest 68030 machine that will ever exist.
>I wouldn't call the TTT a workstation -- and I won't buy it.
Tstststs, turn your mind on before you talk!
1. The processor runs at 2MHz with VME bus only but at full 16Mhz else.
2. The speed factor is 3times(my minimal guess) < 4times < 5times (Leonard).
So do some calculations.... Smalltalk80 for instance runs at 40% Dorado on
the ST. It runs at 116% Dorado on the MacII (CX) with the same software!
So if the TT is 4 times faster than the ST it will run at 160% Dorado and
thats a bringer. I estimate this machine as equivalent to the Max II (CX).
3. The TT uses this so called 'Slow Ram' for the lower 2meg only. The real
memory expansion (who uses a workstation with 2meg anyway?) takes place
at 16meg++ addresses and is called "Fast Ram". This uses full and
sophisticated
caching with 4*64bit burst filling.
The application can decide (loader flag) where the binaries should lie and
where Malloc() calls should take place.
So my impressions (I AM NOT PAID BY ATARI, BUT I LIKE TO TAKE ONE :-)
It has a *UGLY* design (at least).
It is as fast as a MacII (at least)
It is *VERY* TOS compatible. Well, I'd say the Software is not TOS
compatible.
Calamus for instance runs and about 90% of professional software too.
Expect problems with alot of games.
It has nice color graphics (forgot howmany, but *ALOT*) and a nice high
resolution monochrome mode (16??@6??).
It is the cheapest workstation of that power around (about 1/2 the price
of comparable competitors here in Germany).
Besides:
- the drive will be 1.44 meg although they show 720 right now
- the keyboard will be better. It's just a mega keyboard on the fair.
- the monitors will be better. They took VGA monitors for the fair.
It will be in the shops sometimes between Christmas and early spring.
Nobody dared to name an exact date though :-)
If you'll find to take a ride to Duesseldorf you'll enjoy the fair.
There are alot of nice presentations.
Andreas Toenne
atoenne@unido.uucp
Disclaimer: I speak for myself only and not for Atari or my boss.
I may have misunderstood some things and perhaps some of the 'facts' are
wrong or will change. But the machine is real and not bad either.
------------- END USEnet POSTING ---------------------
Sounds good? Will this ever see it to market in the US? If it sees its way
to the US market will it die from lack of ATARI Corp. support?
Will anyone in the US be able to make a living supporting the TT?????
- mike vederman
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 144 Wed Aug 30, 1989
WBLAIR (Forwarded)
Mike,
Many thanks for that USEnet post. Great to here something positive about TT
for a change. Now if I could just get more info on the STE. Guess I'll have
to get in on the conference with SamTramiel tonight.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 145 Thu Aug 31, 1989
RHELZ (Forwarded)
I missed the conference with Sam Tramiel...busy with school. Is it now
availible for downloading? Could someone give me a file number? Thank you
kindly in advance.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 146 Thu Aug 31, 1989
HS (Forwarded)
I think there's both a non-ARCd and an ARCd version. If I remember right,
one was 11996 and the other was 11997. Perhaps one of the STOps could post
the numbers on the door... (I think that Jeff mentioned the numbers in Cat
14.)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 147 Fri Sep 01, 1989
DAVESMALL (Forwarded)
Dot -- thanks for doing the translation -- and apologies for the all the typos
I'm sure you corrected for me.
(I can just see the original translation of what I typed in before correction,
given the usual 1 typo per line rate I manage... "Introducing the Atari TT
Selective Fire Assault Weapon".
Oh, well. )
-- thanks, Dave / Gadgets
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 148 Fri Sep 01, 1989
JEFF.W (Forwarded)
Holly pegged the file numbers for the transcripts exactly:
Un-ARC'ed: File #11996
ARC'ed: File #11997
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 149 Fri Sep 01, 1989
M.VEDERMAN2 (Forwarded)
Here is some more text from USEnet, this time straight from a reliable
source, Allan Pratt! This is a LONG one!
--------------- BEGIN ALLAN PRATT'S USEnet POST---------------
Article 18181 (21 more) in comp.sys.atari.st:
From: apratt@atari.UUCP (Allan Pratt)
Subject: Re: Duesseldorf: personal impression of the TT(T)
Message-ID: <1670@atari.UUCP>
Date: 31 Aug 89 01:19:58 GMT
References: <8908251936.AA19454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <1572@laura.UUCP>
<123947@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Organization: Atari Corp., Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 97
cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis) writes:
>Hmmm, the whole graphics capability question is really foggy so far.
Here's some really straight scoop about the TT from inside Atari:
The video palette has *4* bits per gun for color values. That is, you
have a total of 4096 colors: 16 levels each of red, green, and blue.
(The ST has a palette of 512 colors: 8 levels for each gun.) Another
"color" mode provides 256 levels of grey (actually green), for really
fine reproduction of a black-and-white image. This is independent of
the resolution: if you're in a 16-color mode, you can pick any 16
levels from the spectrum of 256. (We call this hyper-monochrome:
one color, but a lot of it!)
There are *6* video modes: the three ST modes (totally compatible),
plus 640x480 16-color, plus 320x480 *256* color, plus 1280x960
monochrome. ALL of these modes except the last can be shown on a
single monitor. That monitor need not be multisync. It can be a
slightly modified VGA monitor, or (of course) the monitor which Atari
will sell for the TT. The last mode needs a Viking monitor or
something similar.
ST high rez (640 x 400 x 2 colors) is not limited to black and white:
you can choose any two colors.
>Does this mean it has a "DMA" port like the 520/1040/MegaX ? Does it have
>a "real" SCSI port as well? What kind of through put can be expected from
>the hard disk interfaces? Can it do DMA and access > 4Meg ?
Yes, there is a DMA port like on the ST and Mega. Your hard disk will
plug right in. You can connect a bootable SH204 and it will boot!
There is also an external SCSI port. The SCSI port can access the full
32-bit address space; the ACSI port is limited to 24-bit addresses.
The internal hard drive is connected to the SCSI bus.
>Is the
>VME slot the _only_ way to expand it, or does it have a Mega compatible
>expansion connector as well?
There are a number of ways to expand the TT: you can add 2MB of
dual-purpose (video and CPU) RAM, or 10MB when 4Mbit chips are
available. You can add 4MB of REALLY FAST 32-bit nybble-mode RAM (not
video-capable), and there's the VME bus.
The number 2MHz that's been bandied about needs some explanation: The
CPU and memory clock speed is 16MHz. There are four clocks in a bus
cycle. For dual-purpose RAM, around half the bus cycles go to the
video or refresh. Therefore, the CPU gets around two million MEMORY
ACCESSES per second, or 2MHz. There are other architectural details
which make it a little faster than that. And remember, each access
gets you 32 bits, not 16 as on the ST. Also, since the CPU is
allocated half the bus cycles, it isn't ALWAYS postponed by video or
refresh: it might try to access the bus just as its turn comes up, and
not wait at all. Therefore dual-purpose memory accesses run at MORE
THAN 2MHz.
"Fast" RAM does not have video taking up any of the cycles, so you
don't have to wait for that. It takes 4 or 5 clocks (I think) to set
up a fast-RAM access, but "nybble mode" means that the CPU fills its
cache in "burst mode" at one cycle per subsequent access.
The VME logic introduces one wait state, so a VMEbus access takes 5
clocks. (Your mileage may vary: VME cards vary widely in response
time.) But, again, you won't be held off the bus by video. VME in the
TT shown in Germany is A24/D16 (24 bits of addess, 16 bits of data).
>[programs can load in fast RAM or dual-purpose RAM]
By a "loader option" the original poster means "load program off disk"
not "load .o files into a .prg file." This is correct: there are flags
in the PRG header which control the behavior of Pexec and Malloc. Most
program can run in fast RAM -- programs which change the screen base
pointer and some other things can't, though.
>[RAM on the VME bus]
You *can* put memory on the VME bus. The performance penalty is not
bad. TOS will recognize that memory and use it for programs if you set
it up right.
>Does it have a Blitter ?
No need for one. The reason for the Blitter is to remove instruction-
fetch overhead from memory operations, and with the 68030 on-chip
cache, the TT does just fine without it.
>>It is the cheapest workstation of that power around (about 1/2 the price
>>of comparable competitors here in Germany).
You can say that again. Please, people, remember that when you compare
the TT with a Next machine, for instance, you're talking about roughly
4x the price! JT's motto is Power Without the Price, and we think
we're giving you just that.
============================================
Opinions expressed above do not necessarily -- Allan Pratt, Atari Corp.
reflect those of Atari Corp. or anyone else. ...ames!atari!apratt
End of article 18181 (of 18203)--what next? [npq]
------------------ END OF POST --------------------
Sounds good? I like it. Now the only question is:
HOW MUCH WILL IT COST WHEN IT MAKES IT TO THE US?
- mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 150 Fri Sep 01, 1989
SANDY.W (Forwarded)
Looks like Atari is starting to discuss the TT in it's topic in Category 14
Topic 35.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 151 Fri Sep 01, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] (Forwarded)
Mike:
Thank you for the post.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 152 Fri Sep 01, 1989
TOWNS (Forwarded)
Yes, Mike thank you for the post. Darlah can we forward Allan's
message to the TT topic in CAT 14?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 153 Sat Sep 02, 1989
PHOTO.3 at 17:47 EDT
How about to a file in the library? It's a bit long for the BB, don't you
think?
(Wasn't there some talk about what are library files and what are messages?
Seems to me that a Bulletin Board gives the impression that the messages are
like short and sweet notes tacked up on a board...)
Appreciate the info, however, Mike.
--Jerry Finzi
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 154 Sat Sep 02, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 19:48 MDT
TOWNS,
I asked my local dealer if the Moniterm 19" monitor would be compatible with
the TT, and he didn't know. The Moniterm monitor requires a Mega ST board, so
that would indicate that it won't work on the TT. Could you clarify the
situation with regards to the Moniter mon itor??
KEN,
thanks for your excellent notes on the TT. It is nice to have someone from
Atari rebut the rumors floating around about the TT. Good work!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 155 Sat Sep 02, 1989
D.ENGEL at 22:07 EDT
I didn't mind the length of that message. I like long ones! However, I
noticed that everyone has been so concerned with graphics power and cpu power
of the TT, that nobody has questioned the sound of the thing. Is the sound of
the TT going to make Amiga and Apple IIGS owners drool? Is the TT the
birthplace of AMY? Please anyone fill us in on the sound chip in the TT!
Getting back to the recent posts, can anyone explain what 'nybble mode' and
'burst mode' and all of that fast ram techno-jargon means. I consider myself
pretty knowledgeable about microprocessors, but I have never herad oops. never
HEARD of those terms. Are they an Atari specific term, or a 68030 term? Also,
what special features of the 68030 are being utilized in the TT? Can the TT
support virtual memory?
Also, it was mentioned earlier that the EST had a new shifter which had
more hardware capabilities like fine scrolling... please, please, let this
feature be in the TT shifter... I can live without GENLOCK but put fine
scrolling in the TT shifter.
While on the subject of the EST... how does the EST handle existing
software sound calls to the AY-3-8910? Is it still there?
By the way, what are the chances that the only major differences between
my ST and an EST as far as graphics are concerned is a new MMU and a new
shifter? Anyone care to wager? The new sound chip could be taked on anywhere
in the upper RAM addresses, and the new controllers would be read by a new
keyboard processor. How about that for a low cost upgrade? New MMU, Shifter,
keyboard circuitboard, and a sound chip daughterboard!
okay. enough already. I hope this starts some conversation going.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 156 Sat Sep 02, 1989
DOUG.W at 23:12 EDT
The new sound chip is a bit trickier to add. It isn't mapped directly to
memory addresses.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 157 Sun Sep 03, 1989
D.ENGEL at 08:48 EDT
If what you say is true, then it lends credibility to the idea that the EST
is merely an ST with a few add-ons included. If the sound chip isn't memory
mapped, then it must be I/O mapped in some way. I seem to recall there were
unused I/O port bits somewhere in there... if so, it would be even simpler to
add than if it were memory mapped.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 158 Sun Sep 03, 1989
GORDON at 09:47 EDT
Actually I thought the TT looked really nice.. It does not look like a mega in
any way, shape or form.. Try to picture this a flat box the size of a large
cookie sheet about 1 in tall. then they put a mega on the left side and a
disk drive on the left side pored plastic over the top.. there is a deep
indentation betweent the mega and disk drive.. It looks nice. I heard some
people say it was hard to put a monitor on it because of the deep
indentation.. but I did not try it... It did look nice though.. I liked its
looks anyway..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 159 Sun Sep 03, 1989
MRAYMOND at 10:55 CDT
On the other hand, if the two "bumps" are the same height, you could stadlle
the with a monitor and use the hole to stuf your important papers (ie Genie
uploads you will do next, pens, pencils, crayons, etc)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 160 Sun Sep 03, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 11:43 MDT
Will the TT's TOS be multitasking??
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 161 Sun Sep 03, 1989
C.DAYMON at 15:36 EDT
The TT will come with TOS 1.4 which is NOT multitasking. You can, as an
option, buy Unix for (possibly not all configurations) the TT if you want
multitasking.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 162 Sun Sep 03, 1989
D.A.BRUMLEVE at 22:04 CDT
To check out more of Gordon Monnier's opinions on the TT, the Duesseldorf
show, the European Atari market, etc., check out Cat 9, Top 5, Message
66 and Cat 10, Top 3, Message 20 over in the MichTron RT. To get there,
type m490;1
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 163 Mon Sep 04, 1989
DAVESMALL at 00:25 EDT
Dot, thank you for the pointer!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 164 Mon Sep 04, 1989
K.BAD [s/w engine] at 06:17 EDT
Mike: Thanks for forwarding the Usenet posts. However, could you please lose
the headers when you re-post 'em here? Pretty please? (I keep headers turned
OFF when I'm reading netnews - I use brief prompts here on GEnie, I'd rather
not wade through ten lines of header in an embedded message ;-)
And as far as TT documentation is concerned, I have asked my boss if I could
post the _original_ of the flyer that Dave typed in and Dot translated, but I
still get a nebulous "unh" as a reply, and I don't want to get in trouble.
I've taken significant heat for some of my user-friendly posts in the recent
past, so I don't want to overdo it right now. Please also see my message in
the topic Dave recently starteed in this category (cat 14, topic 8, message
2).
TT sound is 8 bit stereo PCM, same as STE. Basically, this is 8 bit
digitized sound, but the sound processor runs independantly of the main
processor, so you can do sound and use the main processor for other things.
Kinda like a "sound coprocessor." Leonard likes the term "Digital Tape
Player," because it can function like that, too. You can't plug DAT's or CD'sC
righ:t into\ your FTT, buLt you Acan plSay digHitized\ sound* easil.y.
* Allan has an affinity for techweenie terminology (so do I, at times! ;-).
"Nybble mode" RAM is not shared with the video but is available directly to
the CPU all the time, so access to it is much faster than the "dual-purpose"
RAM that you're used to in your ST. "Burst mode" is a 68030 cache fill mode,
it gets data off the bus REALLY FAST.
As for specific 68030 support, you'll just have to wait and see what we have
in store for you! The first TOS version that will ship on TT will probably
not multitask - we're shooting for the highest degree of ST compatibility that
we can attain. That's why TT TOS is _like_ Rainbow TOS (it isn't exactly
Rainbow TOS though!). Software that doesn't work on a 68030, though, won't
work under TT TOS.
ttfn...
(*ken @ atari*)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 165 Mon Sep 04, 1989
D.A.BRUMLEVE at 10:38 CDT
Thanks for asking the boss, Ken.
<sigh>
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 166 Mon Sep 04, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 12:57 MDT
Did you all know that even the Mac IIx doesn't support multitasking?? It would
be nice to see Atari beat Apple to the market with a multitasking computer
though.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 167 Mon Sep 04, 1989
NHARRIS [Neil] at 17:19 EDT
I have a Mac II on my desk at work. Running multifinder, it multitasks just
fine. Amazing to see, really -- different programs run in different windows,
with the desktop visible in the background. If I click on a window, that
program becomes the "foreground" one, and its menus appear on the top of the
screen. I can start a download, then switch to other applications.
Background printing is automatic if you want it.
Slick stuff. Not perfect, but nice.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 168 Mon Sep 04, 1989
NEVIN-S at 20:10 EDT
I have to agree. I to see a Multifinder clone on the ST or
TT.
--Nevin
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 169 Mon Sep 04, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 23:10 MDT
I don't want to be negative but....The TT is much slower than the NeXT (16 MHZ
versus 25MHz) and it doesn't come close to Mac II resolution (256 colors from
a palette of 4096 as opposed to 256 colors from 16.8million
and boards are being relesed for the Mac that let you run all 16.8million
colors at once (supposedly)). I for one am dissapointed-it has what I w would
have expected the STE would have and the STE falls far short of what I
expected for itC. Yes: the T\T pricFe/poweLr is vAery goSod andH it is\ a nic*e
look.ing
c*omputer (I am interestead in maybe getting one) but it just can't compete
with the NeXT. Sorry to be so pesimistic-maybe you could convince me
otherwise-I really would like to believe it would kill the NeXT, but my Atari
loyalty is not THAT blind.
Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 170 Tue Sep 05, 1989
DOUG.W at 01:36 EDT
There is already a very nice MultiFinder work-alike on the ST. It's called
JUGGLER. If only programmers would follow the rules, this could be a VERY
VERY useable system.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 171 Tue Sep 05, 1989
TOWNS at 01:52 EDT
I can't understand people.. who mentioned the NeXT machine? I certainly
didn't! Sure.. a 25 MHz 68030 versus a 16 MHz 6803, the 25 MHz is going
to be much faster. Big surprise there.
But you are missing the point. The TT certainly won't cost 10 grand to
buy. It will be MUCH cheaper.
I think the ideal comparision for the TT would probably be an Macintosh
SE/30 or a Macintosh IIcx. But a NeXT machine? It's in a COMPLETELY
different price range than the TT. The NeXT machine is designed for
people who have lots of spare cash, the TT is designed for the masses.
It's designed for people who want the power of a 68030 and UNIX and who
have a LIMITED budget.
-- john
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 172 Tue Sep 05, 1989
PSINC at 12:02 EDT
John, even a Mac IIcx is 8K. Probably would be best to compare it to the Amiga
2500. Thought I would help.;-)
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 173 Tue Sep 05, 1989
NHARRIS [Neil] at 12:14 EDT
Juggler is not the same as multifinder. Juggler is more like the old
Switcher, which is no longer being used.
Right?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 174 Tue Sep 05, 1989
DOUG.W at 12:42 EDT
Neil, I'm specifically referring to Juggler *I*, not II. Juggler I allows for
multiple programs to be loaded simultaneously, and if they are proper GEM
applications, all the windows will be onscreen simultaniously, and you can
change applications by simply clicking on a window that is "owned" by that
application. When you do that, that window comes to the foreground and that
Application's menu bar will become the active one.
Juggler I does dynamic memory allocation, rather than partitioning, so you
don't have to set memory partition sizes.
Also, if the applications call the AES as they should, background processes
*can* continue to run.
This is VERY MUCH like MultiFinder.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 175 Tue Sep 05, 1989
NEVIN-S at 15:07 EDT
It is not like multifinder in that it slows down the system incredibly.
Multifinder does not do this, not nearly as much. That is why Juggler I was so
poorly received. You could have WPerfect and LDW Power up and running, and
each was slower then molasses in January. Even when the not-in-use program was
doing nothing (that is, even if WP was just sitting in the background, NOT
doing a search/replace). Juggler I was so slow he had to come out with Juggler
II or folks would have demanded their money back. If Juggler I had been fast,
it would have been a big hit.
--Nevin
(P.S. I use Juggler II when I need a switcher on the ST).
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 176 Tue Sep 05, 1989
K.BAD [s/w engine] at 17:39 EDT
Mark,
Mac IIcx around 8k? TT will be significantly cheaper than that. I don't
know where people keep getting the idea that TT is gonna be expensive. POWER
WITHOUT THE PRICE.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 177 Tue Sep 05, 1989
C.DAYMON at 20:01 EDT
I strongly agree with John, I'm quite sick of hearing people downing the TT
because it doesn't measure up to the NeXT machine. More like the NeXT doesn't
measure up to the ATW. (For that matter, neither does a Sun workstation.) I
think the TT will do very well going head to head with the Mac II's and Mac
SE/30. I don't know what the TT will cost, but I suspect it may start below
$2500. (I hope, I want to buy one. Hopefully, even lower.) I wish the chip
was faster and there was a 1024x768 color mode, but it still sounds like a
very exciting machine. I think some people should be very carful when
comparing the TT with Mac II stats and remember NOT to specify specs of 3rd
party graphics boards. The TT has a VERY well established STANDARD bus that
will permit the use of a great many existing hadrware add-ons that the
majority of the PC market is just not familiar with because they are usually
on workstations.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 178 Tue Sep 05, 1989
M.VEDERMAN2 at 19:24 CDT
Nevin-s
Actually (from what I know about the Mac) programs have to make a specific
call to get the correct time slicing with MultiFinder, which most of the
old applications don't support.
Juggler II came out because Juggler I was not very compatible, *not*
because it was slow (Tim and I have discussed Juggler at length). It is
really a fine program that may get some resurrection on the TT (if I can
talk Tim into doing an update on it).
So what will the TT price be around in the US anyway? The reports from
Germany indicated $5700 DM, and if I can remember the currency exchange
from the last time we got deutsch mark donations, I think they are about
53 cents to the dollar. which would translate to 3K, but of course this
is before the FCC costs get tacked on, and of course other 'American'
price increase tariffs, etc.
- mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 179 Tue Sep 05, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 19:09 MDT
Does the Mac IIx have memory management?? Because if it doesn't then how can
it have real multitasking?? W/O a MMU you run the risk of any singlle task
crashing the whole system. But, a multitasking TT, with multiple windows
running TOS and capable of exchanging data between them would be great!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 180 Tue Sep 05, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 19:11 MDT
Does anyone know if the Moniterm 19" monitor will work on the TT?? It would be
nice if someone who spent $2,000 on it for the Mega ST4 could use the Moniterm
on the TT. Wouldn't be a waste of bucks then.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 181 Tue Sep 05, 1989
GORDON at 21:57 EDT
The dm to the $$ is 1.9 to 1 that makes a 5700DM computer around $2900.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 182 Tue Sep 05, 1989
GORDON at 21:59 EDT
The biggest reason for Juggler II was the fact that most programs did not use
GEM properly. And, for that reason would not run under Juggler I. These are
the same programs that will not run on the TT or the STE in MAX resolution. -
s
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 183 Tue Sep 05, 1989
NEVIN-S at 23:16 EDT
I guess everyone has their own opinion. I did a thorough review of Juggler I
and even with programs that worked, I found the speed decrease unbearable.
That is just my opinion of course...
--Nevin
Now back to the TT topic...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 184 Wed Sep 06, 1989
D.ANDERSON22 [FastTech Rep] at 00:18 EDT
Actually, Gordon, at 1.9 to 1, a 5700dm machine comes out to EXACTLY $3000.
-Dave
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 185 Wed Sep 06, 1989
SYNERGIST at 00:27 EDT
Amazing! All this fuzz and bother over what is still a vapor machine:-)
Wait until it hits your dealer shelves. Then get upset over what you
on't like. You could be giving yourself fits over a machine
Atari never delivers to the U.S.A. . .
<<Jim>>
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 186 Wed Sep 06, 1989
J.H.CARROLL at 01:51 EDT
Yup, I'm one for waiting until the TT debuts before questioning its power
and price. If Atari the TT ships with all that's promised (including a
version that runs UNIX - seems someone mentioned that the UNIX version would
ship 6 months after the basic one would) then I can't see the problem with a
68030 machine with a price tag of $3000. I mean come on guys, if you WANT
multifinder and the 16.8 million colours, then run out and buy a MAC IIx.
Does anyone believe for a minute that ATARI is making industry-record margins
on its hardware?
Jon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 187 Wed Sep 06, 1989
ICDINC at 10:39 EDT
Nevin,
Don't forget that the Germans pay a 14% National Sales Tax and that
is usually included in the "quoted" retail price. (But not always)
- TOM -
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 188 Wed Sep 06, 1989
GORDON at 14:58 EDT
I have posted an article that was in a English newspaper in the MichTron RT.
The columnist was in Germany for the official introduction of the STE and TT
and makes some very interesting comments about them and Atari.
Its file #1413 in the MichTron RT.. Page 490
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 189 Wed Sep 06, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:53 PDT
I know that this is several months off, but I just got my guide in the mail
yesterday. Will the TT be at Comdex thais November ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 190 Wed Sep 06, 1989
CYCLONE at 23:06 CDT
When uploading text from Usenet or other sources, you may want to be aware
that if you separate it from your message text with a line of dashes GSCAN
will not show the rest of the message (it thinks the next message has begun).
Therefore, perhaps a new delimiter would be in order - may I suggest a line of
pound signs? "################"
- Bill
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 191 Wed Sep 06, 1989
S.NOAH at 21:55 PDT
Gordon,
the article in the MichTron RT was very interesting, but from what the Atari
people around here have been saying the section covering the STe isn't totaly
accurate. The article states that the STe will be able to show 512 colors from
a palette of 4,096, while the Atari spokespeople here have made it pretty
clear that the video modes only have a larger palette, not more displayable
colors.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 192 Thu Sep 07, 1989
TOWNS at 01:13 EDT
Maybe they are talking about the use of Spectrum 512. Which by the way,
still works on STE just fine.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 193 Thu Sep 07, 1989
PSINC [M. Sloatman] at 11:46 EDT
Maybe, but that's pretty misleading unless they mention the use of Spectrum
512.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 194 Thu Sep 07, 1989
ISD at 23:27 EDT
Ahmmmm...s'cuse me! ... thanks... :-)
Today I saw the brochure that Atari Gmbh handed out at the Dusseldorf fair
about the TT.
Please tell me that the very ugly machine on the front *isn't* what the TT
030/2 will look like...please... !!!!
Julius O. @ Large @ ISD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 195 Thu Sep 07, 1989
V.ALBINO at 21:00 PDT
I am a big supporter of Atari. I love my ST. I have been waiting, like many
others, for the debut of the new TT machine. Also, like many others, I have a
lot of questions about what the new machine will or will not have. However,
all of these questions pale in comparison to one, overriding question that I
wish someone would answer. Why did Atari introduce TWO new machine with many
of the same features at the same time? The 68030 TT is a logical upgrade with
more speed, power, resolution, etc. It would have been easy for people to
move to that machine from the ST. But with two machines, there is, in my
opinion, inadequate differentiation in the proposed market. Some people will
go to the STE, which I believe is a waste of Atari's resouces, while others go
to the TT. What is a software developer supposed to write for, the STE, or
the TT? Both? Have we divided and conquered ourselves? If developers aim
for the lowest common denominator, i.e. the program that will run on the most
machines, that means that the STE will have software that will not take
advantage of the additional power of the TT. Will someone please try to make
some sense of this situation for me. It appears that the marketing stategy
here evades my understanding. Thanks.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 196 Fri Sep 08, 1989
TOWNS at 02:51 EDT
The TT is downward compatible with ST and STE computers. Any software
that is written correctly for ST should work on the TT. As for the STE,
please keep in mind that the STE will replace the ST in Atari's line
of computer products.
I personally don't think that we are splitting the market. The machines
are aimed at two distinctly different markets.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 197 Fri Sep 08, 1989
ICDINC at 07:23 EDT
Julius,
That is what they were showing at Dusseldorf. I think Sam and
Leonard probably did get the message from the Germans that it was ugly. In my
own private survey... about 100 said ugly... 1 said nice. The 1 was Gordon
from Michtron.
Hopefully Atari had not started tooling for it. (The cases were
prototype variety foam molded.) If it does come out in that case, maybe we
will have to sell an 'upgrade' case for the TT. ;-)
- TOM -
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 198 Fri Sep 08, 1989
PSINC [M. Sloatman] at 11:56 EDT
So, Gordon was the only one, eh<grin>.
John, do you have any idea on how long before Atari stops manufacture on the
1040/Mega line? How long before the STE takes their place?
Thanks,
Mark P.S. - Any answer yet on the STE developer info?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 199 Fri Sep 08, 1989
GORDON at 14:01 EDT
Towns in reference to your message 196 are you saying that if a game is
written for the ST it will run on the TT but if it is written for the STE it
will not run on the TT?
In other words the STE is not compatible with the TT and ST in the higher
graphic modes. (naturally its not with the ST for get that)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 200 Fri Sep 08, 1989
D.MCNAMEE [Dan2@Atari] at 14:17 EDT
Julius,
What's wrong with it?? I think it looks neat!
Dan
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 201 Fri Sep 08, 1989
TOWNS at 17:07 EDT
Gordon,
Let me spell this out, to avoid the confusion...
The TT is downward compatible with the STE, ST, and MEGA computers.
Any software that is written for machines listed above will work on
the TT. Assuming that it is written properly and designed with the
68030 in mind.
The STE is downward compatible with the ST and MEGA computers. Any
software that is written for machines listed above will work on
the STE (this means the ST and MEGA machines).
...As for the case, well.. I think its interesting. I have heard a
number of comments from people who didn't like it or weren't impressed.
I think Tom is right.. I think Sam and Leonard got that message as well.
As for STE production vs. MEGA production.. I don't know. I don't have
anything to do with the manufacturing side of the business.
STE Developers Documentation: Making progress.. give me alittle bit more
time.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 202 Fri Sep 08, 1989
ISD at 19:40 EDT
What's wrong with it?
Well, it ain't pretty thats for sure. It looks like someone slapped a Mega
and small SH204 on plastic base and decided to call it a TT.
One of the things the TT will need to enjoy success is appearance. What I saw
did not look very professional or business like - it looked more like a toy
computer instead of a 32 bit 16 Mhz near-workstation class machine that it is.
Have a gander at the Sun SPARCstation, or the newer COMPAQ styling (now
*those* looks sharp!). It needs to look sexy, sharp, and "I mean business!".
Just the opinion of a humble programmer... :-)
Julius O. @ Large @ ISD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 203 Fri Sep 08, 1989
M.MCCANN2 at 20:06 EDT
I have a question regarding TT and/or the STE - it was stated somewhere that
the reason the STE has built in Genlock is a new Shifter chip (if I recall
right). And that also gives the 4096 colors. Any way to retrofit that chip,
or any of those other upgrades, to older STs? After all, latest 520/1040s can
accept a Blitter chip while earlier ones would not w/o hacking the hardware.
I am curious as to what is the hardware that permits this "hardware assisted
fine scrolling" (is this the blitter?? or what?) and the 8 bit PCM audio
(Amy??? [Nah]). Thanx for ANY info... [Or, in German, "Wie gehts???"]
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 204 Fri Sep 08, 1989
D.ENGEL at 20:20 EDT
I left a message asking about the sound a few days ago. I also stated
possible upgrade routes for ST/Mega owners. However, "Hardware Assisted fine
scrolling" can only mean that the new shifter allows for the screen address to
reside on any word boundary, and that provisions have been made for pixel
offsets to be made. Combine these two features, and viola: fine scrolling!
(This is only a guess, but it's as much as ANY programmer could hope for)
How are the TT/030 developer docs coming????????
Also, what exactly is the definition of 'Genlock' in the EST? Is it like
the 'stereo capable' TVs and VCRs of a few years back which advertised 'Stereo
Capable' but neglected to mention you had to buy a separate decoder to use
this 'feature'. When you say 'genlock' I want to be able to plug my VCR in one
jack and my Monitor into another, and play the vcr to the monitor with
computer graphics simultaneously. Any extra hardware needed would be
misleading....
Fianlly, can the TT do the same 'Genlock'???
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 205 Fri Sep 08, 1989
DOUG.W at 23:11 EDT
The STE does *NOT* have a GENlock built-in. It was designed so that a low-
cost GENlock could be added EXTERNALLY, with NO internal modifications.
Your assumptions about scrolling are correct.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 206 Sat Sep 09, 1989
C.DAYMON at 00:32 EDT
Personally, I've seen PLENTY of Sun workstations and I think the keyboard
makes a Mega keyboard look EXTREMELY sexy. It may be functionally better, but
it looks like it was cut from a block of stone! Not very stylish at all! I
don't think the Sparc station looks all so great either. Basically like a
Mega with a bunch of blemishes.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 207 Sat Sep 09, 1989
DAVESMALL at 01:03 EDT
The Mac machines with 68030 have an MMU -- inside the 030. The 020 machines
can be fitted with an MMU; it's a prerequisite to installing A/UX. As for true
multitasking without MMU, while it isn't Completely Perfect, heck, the Amiga
seems to do pretty well. (Please, no religious wars..)
I think the mix of UNIX and ST is going to be extremely interesting.
Unleashing the power of the UNIX toolkit on ST developers should give them
access to a world of tools they've never had, which integrate well, which will
greatly speed development and debugging of ST applications. I've not seen
anyone mention this yet, but it may one key selling point to the TT / Unix --
a sort of ultimate (for now) ST development engine.
And mind you, I'm far from being called a UNIX devotee. But the shards of UNIX
that have made it to the ST have usually been pretty popular. And do I ever
need 16 mhz, preferably of no wait state ram, during assemblies.
My opinion? I hope and wish Atari will bring a TT or TTWO to the WAACE show
next month and "debut" them just for ST owners here. It would not be a major
logistical problem -- like, two suitcases? -- can precede Calmdex without
causing problems, and would give American owners a feeling of encouragement.
Cheap when the price is the loan of two machines over one weekend.
Tell you what, Atari ... I'm under nondisclosure and all that. I'll offer to
personally pick up the costs of hand-carrying a TT from your offices, to the
WAACE show, watch it like a hawk there, and get it back to you -- *no cost to
you whatsoever* -- if you'll just hand me one Friday and expect it back
Monday.
-- thanks, Dave / Gadgets by Small
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 208 Sat Sep 09, 1989
S.NOAH at 00:45 PDT
Interesting blurb on the back page of the "Info-worlquirer". They say that the
TT will be the least expensive 68030 machine, of course they also have the
price pegged at about $1,500 ( about half of what I've read here on Genie ). I
wish that they were correct, but, like so much else they say, I don't beleive
it.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 209 Sat Sep 09, 1989
SLP at 07:49 EDT
The $3000 price passed around here was for a complete system with hard
drive, color monitor, and VAT. The $1500 price was just for the system unit
with one floppy and keyboard. I bet the price will be higher, but if it
comes in around $2,000 you'll here most of the complaining around here stop.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 210 Sat Sep 09, 1989
D.ENGEL at 08:49 EDT
About the EST... I hope that someone makes it clear that Genlock is not
built into the computer. The info going around now is somewhat unclear on
that point, and I see ST users talking about the 'built-in' Genlock on some
local BBSs. Just trying to nip a potentially dissappointing rumor in the bud.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 211 Sun Sep 10, 1989
DERRICK at 06:52 EDT
Dave, keep dreaming. THose TTs are for the Germanys like everything else.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 213 Sun Sep 10, 1989
DERRICK at 06:57 EDT
Dave, keep dreaming. Those TTs are for the GERMANS like everything else.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 214 Sun Sep 10, 1989
JEFF.W [RTC Sysop] at 13:55 EDT
Atari has been making it VERY clear that there is no genlock in the STE.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 215 Sun Sep 10, 1989
TOWNS at 14:21 EDT
Dave,
Interesting concept.. I will pass along your message.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 216 Sun Sep 10, 1989
V.ALBINO at 12:09 PDT
It was stated that the STE and TT are intended for two entirely different
markets. I believe this same statement was made when the Mega ST's were first
released. Yet, most people aspired to Mega ownership as a natural upgrade
path. Now, there will be TWO different paths one can choose if he wishes to
upgrade his ST system. He could go to a STE or a TT. If I were a developer,
I would be interested in writing for the largest possible user base. It
would seem, therefore, that people will write for the STE knowing that it may
run on the TT, but who is going to write for the TT--using its special
abilities--when that software will not function on the lower priced STE? I
still believe that Atari has "split the market," and this bothers me. I
still want to know why different versions of the TT are not being produced to
take care of the STE buyers rather than bringing out yet another 16 bit
computer based on the 68000.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 217 Mon Sep 11, 1989
J.H.CARROLL at 18:42 EDT
It seems real simple to me... the *TT* is the upgrade path from the ST. I
don't know about anyone else but fine scrolling, improved sound and quasi-
Genlock hardware (hehehe my trademark term) just aren't enough to have me
running out to sell my old ST. Quite simply, (as Towns said) the STE will
replace the ST line... In other words the consumers buying an ST for the first
time will buy an STE.
REAL upgrade paths involve more speed, more power etc and the TT is the way
to go. I really don't see any evidence of "market splitting".
Jon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 218 Wed Sep 13, 1989
TOWNS at 00:30 EDT
Finally.. a message I can agree with.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 219 Wed Sep 13, 1989
M.MURPHREE at 19:04 EDT
An open letter to Atari:
The introduction of the TT comes at a time when I have been considering an
upgrade. As an engineer (EE), I need a system with superior speed and display
capabilities, plus expansion capability (at the very minimum access to the
system bus). I expect this computer to used for current work activities,
hobby use, development use, and possible private business use later. I have
owned Atari products since 1978, and of course are considering the Atari TT
for a future purchase. There are few things that will effect my decision
though:
1. Packaging, internal expansion capabilities.
Let's face it guys the day of the console computer is gone.
The Atari 400,800; C64, VIC20 etc. were cute at the time,
but there is no excuse for it anymore. I wouldn't begin to
pay the price a Mega commands with the cheap housing it is in.
Likewise, if the stories about the TT case are true, forget it
I will buy something else.
2. Expandibility. Current rumours have that there is only one
expansion slot in the TT. This is barely acceptable, if the slot
must be used for expansion of the memory (preventing any other
additions then it is NOT acceptable.
3. Product support. If the TT does not have adequate product support
for a machine of this caliber, then it will not survive against
its many competitors.
4. Delivery schedules. If the TT doesn't make it to the market in
a reasonable time frame (please, no more escapades like TOS 1.4),
then another manufacturer's machine will be acquired.
Atari still has some loyal customers around, but that loyalty
has been stretched to the limits, guys...
Still waiting...
Mike Murphree
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 220 Wed Sep 13, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:11 PDT
About the TT only having one expansion slot, somebody correct me if I am
wrong, but can't you attach an expansion chasis to the VME bus ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 221 Wed Sep 13, 1989
CAPT.COOK at 23:56 EDT
Mike - Seems to me, it's kinda late for that message now. Hope it all works
out for you, though. -CC
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 222 Wed Sep 13, 1989
WHITESTR at 21:05 PDT
The upgrading of the ST to the STE strikes me as a brilliant
last minute marketing move. Kinda jabs *all* serious ST users
into upgrading to a new machine, while still supporting third party
developers such as the Genlock/4096 JRI man.
Surely its obvious by now that the TT is *the* next wave in
home computing power. The only thing that really seems to be
getting into STers way from cognizing this is the perpetrated idea
that the TT is not going to be *CHEAP*!
Those who believe that no one is going to develop specifically for the
TT are a bit behind the times, me thinks.
Personally, I don't doubt for a second that solid, reasonably priced
color boards will be out for the TT soon after its release.
Furthermore, I do not think that S.Tramiel has any intention of dragging
out US consumers in any way similiar to the 'old' ST days.
Just call me psychic...(:)
Dai Le'on--Whitestar Mageware
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 223 Thu Sep 14, 1989
JEFF.W [RTC Sysop] at 00:42 EDT
Thanks to K.BAD, we now have the original English text of the TT flyers handed
out at the Dusseldorf Atari Fair. It is THE_TT.TXT (file #12108) in Library
14.
Thanks, Ken!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 224 Wed Sep 13, 1989
S.NOAH at 22:41 PDT
I was just thinking ( it somtimes gets a bit dangerous when I do that ), since
the TT is so much faster than the ST, could it support a screen postscript
driver through GDOS. I remember that my early version of Touch-up came wit
its own screen driver which which displayed a set of outline fonts. Does this
sound like it might work ? Is GDOS on the TT the same as GDOS on the ST ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 225 Thu Sep 14, 1989
GW.MILLER at 09:02 EDT
I had the chance to play with a TT a few months ago. At that time I was
promised that Developers versions would be available in AUgust. (In my
excitement over the raw speed of this beast, I did neglect to determine August
of what year.)
After the horrendous marketing strategy of the ST, I'll have to wait until
the STE and TT's are really in stores available to the general public before I
get excited.
On the other hand, it's only 8 months 'til June when the STACY will be
available in quantity.
I heard a rumor that the Lynx will only be available in NYC and LA this
Christmas, and my questions about the Portfolio have been greeted by wild
laughter,
On the other hand, the Sharp is looking better and better. BTW, I put my
name on the list as a Portfolio developer several weeks ago, and still
haven't heard a word from Atari.
Guess I'll just be conservative on this one.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 226 Thu Sep 14, 1989
TOWNS at 17:20 EDT
George,
Who did you contact at Atari regarding becoming a developer for
Portfolio? Where are these questions that have been greeted by wild
laughter
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 227 Fri Sep 15, 1989
GW.MILLER at 09:09 EDT
Contact Gail Johnson about Developer Info. SInce MichTron stuck loyally with
the ST through the years, I thought we might experience some return from the
Portfolio.
Wild laughter? Every idea I come up with that depends on Atari delivering
a product to the market in quantity.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 228 Fri Sep 15, 1989
M.VEDERMAN2 at 19:04 CDT
I heard from a store in town (this is off subject...) that the portfolio
was 'in the warehouse' and will be shipping to the 'top 25' retail
store in the US. One in Houston included...
- mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 230 Fri Sep 15, 1989
BSTONE at 22:10 EDT
Is it true that only 25 dealers will get the portfolio??? I have heard a that
Atari had only 200 dealers and that half of them were Midi dealers. Now that
means that 75 dealers will not get any portfolios!! I know that if I was one
of the 75 shorted I would no longer be an Atari dealer!! I wonder when Atari
is going to learn that it needs its dealers a lot more then the dealers need
them?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 231 Sat Sep 16, 1989
V.ALBINO at 10:06 PDT
Does ANYONE know what the real shipping date of the TT is supposed to be? The
only thing official that I've heard is..."before the end of the year." The
Christmas season is almost here. Will the TT be able to take advantage of
that time of the year when most of the computer systems are sold, or will it
arrive too late? Just wondering.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 232 Sat Sep 16, 1989
TOWNS at 13:37 EDT
No release date has been announced. When we are ready for release, we
will post here.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 233 Sun Sep 17, 1989
S.NOAH at 00:34 PDT
Just curious, everything that I've read about the TT states that it has 512K
of ROM, what is going on in all that extra space ? Is this something that we
should look forward to ? Can anyone say anything about this ? No ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 234 Sun Sep 17, 1989
M.MURPHREE at 04:12 EDT
In Mr. Tramiel's CO, he mentioned that the TT would be released by the end
of the year. He neglected to mention in what country. I did notice their was
no Atari response to my earlier concerns and comments. I interpret this as
another unofficial Atari "No Comment...".
A side question, has anyone attempted to run the current version of
pc ditto on the TT? With the speed of the 16 Mhz 68030, the emulator should
be able to run at a reasonable speed, if compatibility has been maintained.
Mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 235 Sun Sep 17, 1989
DAVESMALL at 15:30 EDT
There's a lot of IFs there. Bill had to pull major magic to get the Ditto up
to its current speed -- he approached the theoretical limit of what is
*possible* -- and the 68000 and 68030 machines are different enough in places
it could trip things up. Even common stuff like MOVE SR,blah in user mode now
chokes.
But knowing Bill, he's probably moved it to another 030 platform and checked
it out. He's pretty sharp.
Atari: Am I now allowed to ask specific TT questions, bearing in mind that I'm
under nondisclosure, since it is now an announced product? Actually, Allan's
USENET posts tell me a great deal.
-- thanks, Dave / Gadgets
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 236 Sun Sep 17, 1989
TOWNS at 19:47 EDT
Sure, Dave.. ask away. If we can answer them, we will.
Mike, what was your question? I don't remember missing one..
If so, ask again. Maybe I can answer it this time! :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 237 Sun Sep 17, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 22:46 EDT
Hi folks
Towns why hasn't Gadgets and Avantgarde been sent TT's? They have the two
products that give the most attraction to NEW buyers and they also need the
most lead time. It's only in Ataris best interests!!!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 238 Mon Sep 18, 1989
GW.MILLER at 09:27 EDT
What about MichTron? We have the MOST products for the ST and have been here
the longest.
Of course, during a recent phone call to Atari I did have to explain that
Yes, MichTron did produce software for the ST. Seems the person had never
heard of us.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 239 Mon Sep 18, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 11:08 EDT
Sorry Gordon, but you are an ST developer and since you already obey the rules
on the ST your almost done before you start, it's the emulator guys,
especially Bill with HW, that need the most lead time to get there stuff over.
AND MAC AND IBM compatibility are I think the most important attributes of the
ST in the eyes of NEW buyers!!! So it's in ALL our best interests to slip Dave
and Bill a TT each!!!!
BTW TEMPUSII is the cats meow!!!! Thanks for bringing it to us.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 240 Mon Sep 18, 1989
PSINC at 12:16 EDT
I disagree Jim, people do not purchase a computer because it can emulate a PC
(maybe a Mac, because of the price difference). While Spectre 128 and Pc Ditto
are important products, we probably sell more Mouse Masters each month in the
US than they do. People want a computer system to fill their needs with the
existing software and hardware. Emulation is a nice extra.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 242 Mon Sep 18, 1989
GORDON at 20:35 EDT
Jim did you buy your atari to get a PC or a Mac???
Nuff said...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 243 Mon Sep 18, 1989
D.ANDERSON22 [FastTech Rep] at 23:45 EDT
The point is made, Jim. You're undoubtedly right in that HW guys like Bill
and Dave, and even Mark (PS) and John Russell have the longest lead time, but
it only makes sense to give some level of support to the guys like Gordon, and
Nathan, and you, and Dan & Rick, and Liz & Kevin, and who-all else is out
there busting their caps to support Atari, as well. Get the machines to the
developers, to get the development started.
-Dave
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 244 Mon Sep 18, 1989
TLMAY at 20:55 PDT
Mark...
"We probably sell more Mouse Masters each month in the US than they [Avant
Garde and Gadgets] do."
I didn't know Avant Garde and Gadgets by Small sold Mouse Masters! <grin>
(Sorry, Mark, I couldn't help myself!)
I have a solution: Send TT's to MichTron, Avant Garde, Gadgets by Small,
Practical Solutions, CodeHead Software . . . and TERRY MAY!
...TERRY MAY!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 245 Mon Sep 18, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 23:57 EDT
Gordon....to get a MAC. Actually not the way you think though since I bought
my 1040 "BD-Before Dave" back in late 85'. I bought it because I wanted a
68000 system and couldn't afford $3000 for a MAC 128K. Gordon ther are 35
million PCs and 'bout 6 million Macs so I "THINK" people buy computers for PC
and MAC applications don't you? What I said was a MAJOR selling point for the
ST is that it provides Mac AND PC compatibility as well as some great SW and
features of its own. Where else can you say that at ANY reasonable price. You
can put a PC in your Mac, but PCDII will be faster than the Mac PC addons, and
you can't by a Mac emulator for the PC anywhere! So IF you put on your dealer
hat and face the facts that to be a Mac dealer it will cost you more up front
than becoming an ST dealer, and the same goes for BRAND name PCs. And IF you
sat back and thought about how much easier it will be selling STs if you can
say with a straight face...It's Mac AND PC compatible...you might have a
chance to make some money here.
The ST can be a vehicle to bring BOTH Mac and PC compatibility to the
personal computer user, as well as some nice stuff on its own. And it can do
this at a very reasonable price!
BUT, selling the ST without these things leads to it eventually shrinking
to the level of a curiousity! I would rather throw in with full compatibility
set since it has a better chance for long term success. It's not like this is
an insult, the STs most unique feature is it's compatibility, and with PC
speed addressed and Mac Clonehood just around the corner (TT is Appletalk
ready!!!) it could be the BEST computer a person could buy!!!! So it is in
Ataris best interest to get a TT to both Dave and Bill <period>. All the ST SW
developers will have an easier time of it fixing incompatabilities so the
earliest units should go to them!!!! And BTW Apple DOES NOT CHARGE it's most
important developers for new CPUs, like when the MACII came out. Microsoft and
others got free units, prototypes even, so they would have SW ready by the
time the thing was announced let alone shipping. The "rest" of the developers
got units after that and they paid for them. Hey, JRI got a TT before any of
us knew one existed!!!! Now that's early. So Mark I (as always) think I'm
right.
Jim <one mans opinion> Allen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 246 Tue Sep 19, 1989
TOWNS at 00:24 EDT
According to the information I have, JRI does not nor have they
ever had a TT prototype machine. This is a false rumor.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 247 Tue Sep 19, 1989
DOUG.W at 07:37 EDT
Even if Atari can't get machines to developers, some technical documentation
would be a *BIG* help! This would give developers some time to work out
solutions to any problems they might have (replacing timing loops, add support
for additional graphics modes, support multiple serial ports, etc.)
As it stands, the developers will be able to *start* work when the machine
is released, which is *MUCH* too late!
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 248 Tue Sep 19, 1989
PSINC at 10:53 EDT
Jim, i think you're letting your personal preferences get in the way of what
you think _other_ people want.
The machines should be made available to all developers. I could make a
case for any developer specifically (including us). The fact is that emulator
developers are not the _most_ important developers, I think Doug and Dave
would agree on that (and Bill too).
Besides, Atari will say it's PC and Mac compatible with third party
solutions anyway.;-)
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 249 Tue Sep 19, 1989
GORDON at 11:11 EDT
A quote from a magazine..
The fact is the Poquet seems to be the only small scale computer backed by a
true software strategy. We get a stone sense that Poquets founders much more
then other small scale hardware venders understand the key role that software
plays in determining whether a new machine files or flops. For the moment
Poquets software evangelism effort has focused on lining up a small but
carefully chosen suite of app- lications Lotus, Word Perfect, XYright, ACT,
agenda, ALphaworks and a few others. That legitimize the Poquet as a
mobile desktop.
Compare this to Atari.. To the best of my knowledge not one developer in the
US has a portfolio.. Not one developer has even the specs or information
sheet on the computer.
Yet they are shipping the computer. I have not even been offered the
oportunity to purchase one at any price.
The TT.. who knows it is months away..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 250 Tue Sep 19, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 12:34 EDT
Mark...you're right, what I meant is really history anyway. When Atari had
only a few protos (you know..like last april) they should of place some at
STRATEGIC developer locations. NOW they damn well should get'em to ALL
developers, and at COST!!!! NOW!!! And where the hell is the INFO, like what's
the system variable that tells the application of processor type? Is Big A
going to wait until AFTER comdex to tell certain people? So I will drop the
subject Mark...you win.
John(Atari) I guess I was misinformed, BUT considering the ratio of my
being misinformed to YOUR being misinformed I think you should believe what
you hear on GEnie BEFORE you trust what is told to you from INSIDE the
company! Maybe John Russell didn't get a unit early, BUT I DOUBT IT
considering my source. And it does make sense since the genlock function is
needed to give good demos of the TTs abilities, and Atari has exibited a lack
of understanding as to HOW to do genlock right. You must learn how to
seperate the wheat from the chaff.
-Jim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 251 Tue Sep 19, 1989
NEVIN-S at 13:03 EDT
Yes, it is amazing that the TT is not available to developers now if it is so
close to shipping. Of course the logical deductino (oops, deduction) is that
it is NOT close to shipping at all. Oh well...
--Nevin
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 252 Tue Sep 19, 1989
J.MEEHAN3 at 22:43 EDT
ALLEN..
I did not buy my Mazda RX7 because it was compatible with a FORD, but it was
nice to know that it used the same fuel.
The ST is saleable on it own, but I agree that it is best to sell all it's
best points. The salesman should know his customers.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 253 Wed Sep 20, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 00:36 EDT
J.MEEHAN3...you're right, but I did buy my Corvette knowing that most
reasonable upgrades to the engine, etc. would be retrofittable. Like the 89
Z51 brakes, and the roller lifters, and the aluminum heads, and the better
alignment specs (kinda like TurboST in it's effect), etc, etc....thtas a stab
at the STE. And it uses the same small block chevy engine thats been around
for 30 years...it's\ compatible! the point is be compatible with what is
important, and both PC and Mac stuff is important. I have talked to dealers
that don't understand enough about Spectre so they don't carry it. They are
missing an opportunity just like Atari does when not facilitating certain
things in the world. Atari simply does not orchestrate marketing policies and
advantages as well as they could. We all suffer for it.
Right on Nevin
-Jim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 254 Wed Sep 20, 1989
CYCLONE at 00:01 CDT
Hey, here's a thought - perhaps what with Atari's newly-found ability to "keep
a secret", perhaps ALL the developers already have TT's, but they are just
pretending to be disgruntled so we'll all be totally surprised when the
machine comes out with TONS of software!!
- Bill (slightly optimistic this evening)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 255 Wed Sep 20, 1989
BREHBOCK at 01:15 CDT
Yea, that's the ticket! All the developers _do_ have TT's! ...And they were
all supplied by Atari for _free_! ...yea...And it's really a 25Mhz machine...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 256 Wed Sep 20, 1989
PSINC at 02:49 EDT
Ok with me Jim, let's just pick on Towns<grin>.
Seriously, if Atari wanted to support key developers (ourselves included) ;-
) They wouldn't have to spend much. There must only be a dozen or so.
We bought a IIx at half off list, _before_ the stores had it. And we have
info on System 7 _now_. Atari should really get it together!
I think that JRI had a STE, not a TT, but same thing. We still don't have
full specs on it.
Mark
PS - Cyclone, you're wrong. Atari PAID the developers to take TT's, that's
why we've been so quiet!;-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 257 Wed Sep 20, 1989
TLMAY at 01:39 PDT
Mark...
You've just described a good reason WHY Atari only has a dozen or so key
developers. If they supported their developers better (not to mention their
USER BASE), I guarantee you there'd be more than a dozen...
...Terry
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 258 Wed Sep 20, 1989
GORDON at 09:59 EDT
Aw common.. Atari supports us..
We got Towns on GEnie what else could we want. :-)
We called Atari yesterday and were told the developer information for the
portfolio would be out "any day now" and that we could purchase one for $399
and they gave us the 800 phone number. I can get a Sharp WIzard for $199.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 259 Wed Sep 20, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 10:38 EDT
Right on Mark, Iconfess I have a TT......
.....in my dreams! -Jim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 260 Wed Sep 20, 1989
PSINC at 10:58 EDT
Really Jim? I thought you got the '040 machine.;-)
And you're right Terry...
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 261 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] at 17:14 EDT
Come on guys.........have you noticed how many messages John Townsend has
replied to in this area???
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 262 Wed Sep 20, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 17:42 EDT
Hi Darlah, we are just looking for the REAL DOPE ont the TT, you know stuff
thats important. The Atari dev area is about as informative on this subject as
this is.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 263 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] at 19:02 EDT
Hi there.....................;-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 264 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DERRICK at 19:09 EDT
All you guys that want a TT, MOVE TO GERMANY!
ATARI, have you ever consider moving your headquarters to Germany? I mean
since you guys are sending everything over there, you might as well. Also what
happen to the advertisement for the Portfolio? It is shipping right? This year
will be your make or break year! 3 pass by already and I've yet to see any
real support.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 265 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] at 19:11 EDT
They are advertising the Portfolio.......
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 266 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DERRICK at 20:04 EDT
DARLAH, they are advertising where, on the Atari Corp. billboard? see ya.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 267 Wed Sep 20, 1989
MRAYMOND at 22:22 CDT
Wait - I came to the Atari is err... a 68030--- no, wait a 68050 - yea that's
the ticket and the developers here are complaining... er well because they
don't have information on the chip, and it compiles too fast for them to see
the resultsnad a each machine is shipped - no a arrives hand delivered by Sam -
uh no Morgan Fairchild... That's why their busy, yea.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 268 Wed Sep 20, 1989
CAPT.COOK at 23:42 EDT
Derrick - Maybe the Atari Corp biiboard, but also the Wall Street Journal.
(The cynicism in here is starting to choke me -- to the point I can't even
spell) -CC
Q: What's the world's most thankless job?
A: Atari on-line representative.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 269 Wed Sep 20, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 23:46 EDT
It's also a pretty demanding job...lots of questions, questions, questions...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 270 Fri Sep 22, 1989
M.MURPHREE at 00:47 EDT
John, I believe its too late to resurrect the entirety of my original
questions and concerns. The main focus of it was for Atari to please realize
that consumers are very tired of the "toy" computers that have been produced
in the past, that do not lend themselves to being expanded or used in a
professional environment.
The TT should break new ground for Atari and show the world that they can
produce a professional system.
For my own use, considering the speed the TT should have, it would be very
desirable if through some software or hardware means it will be able to run PC
software at least at the speed of a low end AT if possible. This will
greatly increase the amount of software that can be run on the machine. Would
have replied sooner but software development stops for no one.... Over 2 meg
of source code and still not done!
Mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 271 Thu Sep 21, 1989
S.NOAH at 23:56 PDT
What will be the configuration of the VME slot on the TT ? I know that it is
only supposed to have one VME/DIN connector, but will it allow full height one
connector cards to be added to the system ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 272 Fri Sep 22, 1989
D.ANDERSON22 [FastTech Rep] at 18:17 EDT
From what's been bandied about here and there, it is my impression that the
TT's slot is configured for "Eurocard" VMEs.
-Dave
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 273 Sat Sep 23, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 00:50 EDT
Yeah, but REAL eurocard is a 6U card meaning 2 96pin DIN connectors. Thats
what is so puzzling, the second connector has the upper 16 data bits to form a
32 bit bus?
Watch Atari invent a ASCI type VME bus!!!! That will need a VME host
adapter card to somehow propietarize the bus.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 274 Sat Sep 23, 1989
BREHBOCK at 02:25 CDT
John, are these bus answers on the don't talk-about-it list? I know it seems
silly, but is there any chance of posting an .IMG file or two of the TT's that
were over at the Dussledorf (sp?) show? I think it would make for a couple
happy campers here and there.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 275 Sat Sep 23, 1989
MAS2743 at 14:04 CDT
Gee - I haven't read this 230 messages in this topic yet! It sure sounds
verrrry intereesting to read them tonight.
...but uh, oh, here is the bad news...
Is it true that Atari President Sam Tramiel said that he hopes TT will clobber
NeXT and Mac II computer? Well, here is the news I read about in the
INFOWorld magazine April, 1989 (?).
Title: Mac II Programs Run Faster on Non-Apple Workstation Author: Laurie
Flynn
Sixty-Eight Thousand Inc. (so-called 68000 Inc), released earlier this month
a 68030-based workstation that the company says runs Mac software at several
times the speed of a Macintosh II.
The vendor inserts a Mac II motherboard into a floor-standing case, and then
swaps in a 32-Mhz Motorola 68030 microprocessor. The company then accelerates
the system's performance with the addition of the Pronto SCSI accelerator
from Golden Triangle, a math coprocessor, and a high-speed RAM cache.
The $15,000 machine includes 5 NuBus slots and comes with a licensed version
of the Macintosh system software.
The strategy of swapping a Mac motherboard into a non-Apple case is one
already followed by Colby Systems, which markets a line of Mac-clone laptop
computers.
Jim Takatsuka, an Apple VAR account executive, said that while the business
issues of such a strategy may be unresolved in the case of some companies, no
legal problems exist.
The base system includes the 68882 math coprocessor, RAM cache, Pronto
accelerator, 4 megabytes of RAM, and a 180-megabyte hard disk. Options (look
at that Atari!) includes a RISC microprocessor (Motorola 88000), a LISP engine
(for Artificial Intelligence application), and a Digital Signal Processor
(just like NeXT computer has), as well as an Ethernet card and high-capacity
WORM drive.
According to Sixty-Eight Thousand president Robert Meyer, most of his
customers are interested in simply running their Mac II applications faster,
rather than using the 68030-based workstation as a high-speed RISC or parallel
processing engine. It is the matter of their choice.
Sixty-Eight Thousand Inc. 26346 Carmel Rancho Lane Carmel, CA 93923; (408) 626-
1711 (tell them I sent you)
Now, if you wish, will that KILL, SQUASH, FLAP, OVERTHROW, ZAP, etc the Atari
new TT workstation? Remember, TT doesn't have most of the options as
mentioned above except for the VME card(s). Of course, Im a bit worry about
this kind of threat for Atari. I still like the TT price but TT lacks some of
the performance or options. I don't know if it will be possible for TT to
catch up with those kinds of bell-whistle. OR is it that Sixty-Eight Thousand
Inc. trying to deny the TT's existence or trying to scare Atari?
Towns, what do you think of it? Any comments?
Your informative friend, Mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 276 Sat Sep 23, 1989
BREHBOCK at 17:29 CDT
Mike, there's no comparison between the two machines. You can buy an ATW for
the prices you're throwing around.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 277 Sat Sep 23, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 21:10 MDT
No you can't! As far as I know the ATW is at least a year away!
Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 278 Sun Sep 24, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 00:03 EDT
Don't forget the transputers in the ATW are geared toward image processing and
other highly parrallelizable things, an accelerated ...33Mhz, 128K cache,
etc...030 Mac II will kick the ATWs ass in ordinary desktop publishing
activities, only in highly tuned graphics activities...like renderman...can
the transputers shine. The ATW is nobody but Lucasfilms' desktop solution,
that's why you see all the transputers being used for digital video graphics
type applications...because the suck at the day to day activities of an
ordinary office environment. ATWs exist but so what, big deal we need a killer
TT. Anybody can have the equivalent of what 68000 Inc...boy is that
conseeded...is doing by buying the $5000 33Mhz 030 accelerator with cache the
daystar or siclone are selling for the Mac IIs. The equivalent can be built
for the TT too. So a killer TT is only as far away as the TTs delivery date.
When is that JOHN?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 279 Sun Sep 24, 1989
PSINC at 11:21 EDT
Absolutely Jim. Transputers are _not_ suited for "regular" applications.
In November Apple will release the 25 mhz IIci, and in Febuary the _50mhz_
one! But they have not been just increasing processing speed, the new models
fully support multitasking and virtual memory. Also the prices are coming
down, and they're putting video and Ethernet on the motherboard.
Atari had better get with it!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 280 Sun Sep 24, 1989
M.LEDFORD at 16:15 EDT
An Open Letter to Atari:
This is being written just to get a load off my mind, but I hope in a way
that will be taken as constructive.
First, just to let you know that I am not a non-Atarian, I bought my first
Atari ST (1040) back in '86, coming from a Radio Shack TRS 80. I now own a
MegaST2 upgraded to 4 megs, which I use for publishing a couple different
newsletters. I also own a DeskJet, Migraph hand scanner/Touch-Up, a mono and
a color monitor. I am the secretary of our local Atari ST user group, and
have been with this group since its inception.
I find, along with many, many other loyal Atarians, that I struggle with a
love/hate relationship with Atari. I don't think that many other companies
that make other types of computers have as loyal a following (with the
exception, I think, of Amiga owners) as you do. But it seems to me that you,
out of ignorance or otherwise, end up giving us the cold shoulder. I am
referring to the lack of support that I have seen, both here on this BBS, and
with my local dealer.
Now I know that you have said that this is going to change, and perhaps you
are making a sincere effort in this direction. But I am brought back to
reality when I read the on-line talk here in the support areas. What I am
referring to specifically is the total lack of news regarding the new
computers that were (so long in being) announced. Not only are there no
updates on the new machines, there doesn't seem to be ANY information going
out to any of the developers.
You kept us in suspense for many months with your policy of not announcing
anything before it was close to being shipped, then after bringing out the
new STE and TT, you clamped the lid on the whole news outlet again! (Now I am
in agreement with you on waiting for products to be close to shipping before
making the announcements and whipping up the fanfare, but to deliberately
throw cold water on the new spark of interest doesn't make sense to me.)
I watched with interest when the Stacy was announced, knowing that this would
be a knockout if gotten to the market. What with all those people out there
who wanted a laptop Macintosh, this would have made the sales of that
computer sweet indeed! But as of this point in time, there still is no Stacy.
Now I have seen the advertisements for the laptop Macintosh, which will suck
away sales from Stacy.
I am very interested in the TT because of the advances that it will give to
users, and the extreme competition it will bring to other computer lines. But
I am afraid that there will not be any soon release of this machine. Too bad.
It makes it hard to root for you. The ST/TT line of machines are so good when
compared to all the others on the market, but the support for them just isn't
there!
Please!! Please!! Get some people that can get the information out, that can
get machines into the hands of the developers, that can answer at least some
of the questions that come up here in this area (or are at least allowed to
answer).
For myself, I am considering upgrading to the TT, but the total lack of
information of how things are going is really depressing. Please cheer us all
up with some crumbs from your table!!
Sincerely,
_|_
Mike |
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 281 Sun Sep 24, 1989
C.DAYMON at 17:05 EDT
Aric,
I DOUBT that your statement about ATW availability holds. Considering the TT
has yet to be released and the ATW is shipping to all the appropriate places
for a machine with an achitecture that is not well understood by most. The
british magazines report that every ATW they can make is being sold to
universities and developers. Usually configured to price in at about $40,000.
(Extra Transputers and RAM.) These are the ideal places to send a new and
innovative machine. Considering the advantage of an on-chip math coprocessor
and RISC processing, I think even 1 20MHz transputer could give a 33MHz 68030
a pretty fair run for its money. Again, the 68030 is a well understood chip
and top applications should appear almost immediately, but I think these will
be pale in comparison to the applications for the ATW 2-3 years from now.
(Reflect back on the CRAP that was available for the ST 3 years ago and the
68000 was rather well understood then.)
In the defense of the TT, I think it would be key to remember that the
Commodore 64 has outsold any other single computer to date. (Or at least
until very recently.) It certainly wasn't because it could outrun all the
competition, but probably because it offered the best dollar value. The Atari
8-bits could outperform it graphically and in processing speed.
This is possibly rumor, but I read where Atari has adopted the multitasking
system developed by Intelligent Music for future STs. I haven't seen this
operating system or read anything about it, but if this is true, it will mean
multitasking for the STs.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 282 Sun Sep 24, 1989
BREHBOCK at 16:36 CDT
Mike Ledford: I LIKE YOUR LETTER!!!
I think it just might be a good idea for EVERYONE to capture it, adjust or
delete the equipment specifications to his/her needs and mail copies to Sam
Tramiel, Jim Fisher, Leonard Tramiel, Antonio Salerno, and Sig Hartmann at :
Atari Corporation
1196 Borregas Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA
94086
Something has to happen soon! There are a lot of Users, Developers, Dealers,
and maybe even employees that are very frustrated with the way things are
currently being handled. I can't help but feel that Sam and friends have to
really care deep down inside, but it must be getting badly misdirected
somewhere along the line. Something has to give!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 283 Sun Sep 24, 1989
GORDON at 19:13 EDT
Way to go Mike.. Only problem is that Jack and Sam dont read the messages on
here. Why not mail it to them.. Atari Corp
1196 Borregas Ave Sunnyvale, Ca 94088
I think everyone should write and tell Atari what you think of their dealer
and developer support. About all the new hardware we have seen in the past 3
years. Tell them what you think... I think Sam and Jack need to see an
outpouring of opinions.
Atari has never advertised in the US. All of their computers were sold
because people like you and me told our friends to buy them. I think Atari
is losing this. Would you recommend a friend to buy an ST???
or would you tell them to wait for an STE...or wait for a TT or buy something
else???
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 284 Sun Sep 24, 1989
J.H.CARROLL at 21:57 EDT
Its unfortunate that the case history of the Commodore 64 keeps coming back to
haunt us because that's probably some of the very essence of the trouble at
Atari. Fact is palin and simple : the 64 did well years ago when people who
bought computers did so with very different criteria in mind.
Price today plays a very small part in many people's computer buying habits.
They want a computer that will run the same kind or quality of pro programs
that they're using at work. They want something that has a large software
base for it with plenty of user support. People are smarter today. Even if a
68030 system is available, they're going to think twice if it doesn't have a
suitable number of slots (and *1* slot isn't suitable) etc etc. Its about
time we forgot about the 64. It wouldn't fare as well in today's market.
As for the Apple Mac IIci, its shippiong now-- no need to wait till Nov.
Jon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 285 Sun Sep 24, 1989
A.RICHARDSO7 [ATW MAN!] at 22:51 EDT
I work for a company that's in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. Our situation reminds
me of Atari's: Lots of good ideas and people, but REAL short on cash. That
is the real problem with Atari, they need to work within their means to avoid
failures. Hey, Topic Police! HELP{!!!!!!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 286 Sun Sep 24, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 23:06 EDT
A.RICHARDSO7, Atari is a $400 million company and ain't in any financial
difficulty. In fact what the market analysts wnat to know is where is Atari
going...i.e. what new developments will continue to make Big A a good
investment. Chapter 11 they ain't in.
Craig, the transputer is a SERIAL processor, it doesn't have a 32bit wide
data/address bus, it is designed for processing ...in parrallel with other
TPs...serial data streams from sources like vidoe, if saddled with the need to
do a lot of random access 2D processing like in DTP applications it couldn't
keep up with an old grandmother let alone a 33Mhz 68030. You have swallowed
the ATW line...the universities in question aren't writing letters they are
doing image processing. The ATW and any other highly specialized computer is
suited for few purposes. The 680X0 and 80XXXs of the world are for the general
purpose random access type applications you use the ST for.
I bet TOWNS will not answer any of these technical questions no matter how
nicely he is asked, we need more in depth info ...so how does it feel to want.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 287 Mon Sep 25, 1989
ISD [Julius] at 01:03 EDT
From futzing with early ATWs, and a prototype before that:
A 20 Mhz 68030 cleans a 20 Mhz T800's clock on integer benchmarks.
A 20 Mhz T800 cleans a 20 Mhz 68030/68882s or 20 Mhz 80386/80387s clock on
floating point benchmarks.
*If* you can get your program into the T800s on-board 4k RAM, then the integer
benchmarks are comparable to a 20 Mhz 68030.
Considerin that the T800 is a 'first' generation RISC chip and SPARC, MIPS,
88000, 80486, 68040 are 'third' generation RISC (or based on RISC-type
implementation in case of the latter two), the T800 is an olde f*rt as far as
RISC technology goes. It kills me when MIPS magazine benchmarks a prototype
25 Mhz 80486 system against a DEC MIPS based system running at 12.5 Mhz - and
the DEC beats most of the '486 benchmarks! Those dudes at MIPS technology are
doing good work...
The ATW is a excellent machine if you want to do parallel, distributed type
processing - the 'next' generation of computing. Current single processor
architectures can only be pushed so fast, the next step is more than one
processor working on the same, or different, thing. Those that learn parallel
programming will be ready for the next wave...at least I think so! <grin>
But then again, this is the wrong topic... :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 288 Mon Sep 25, 1989
DOUG.W at 05:25 EDT
For more info on the TT, file #260 in the Gadgets RT is a compilation of
USENET notes concerning the TT. The file unARCs to over 100K of _very
interesting_ info!
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 289 Mon Sep 25, 1989
GORDON at 12:20 EDT
Interesting tidbit in Computer Shopper... Mr Nagy says Sig Hartman is going to
resign if the TT is not out this year...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 290 Mon Sep 25, 1989
NEVIN-S at 14:07 EDT
Sig Hartman has already decided to resign, as almost everyone in the ST
community knows. I don't think it has anything to do with the TT, though that
would make an elegant excuse.
The man has put in enough years and he is entitled to resign whenever he
wants.
--Nevin
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 291 Mon Sep 25, 1989
TOWNS at 15:05 EDT
I have printed out the message that Mike wrote and the responses to
it. I will be passing those along to my boss, Antonio Salerno. I have
been passing along messages from this area for the last couple of weeks
and will continue to do so.
As for your questions, I didn't see any technical questions. Does anyone
have any? If I don't know the answer myself, I will try to find out what
I can.
-- John
------------
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 1 Sat Jun 10, 1989
R.MOYER1 at 04:06 EDT
Can anyone give me any definitive answers about the T Like what features,will
it be a true multitasking machine like the Amiga as I've heard it rumored? I'm
sincerely interested in this, and please, no Amiga/ST bashing please. Keep
that to CAT 18....
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 2 Sat Jun 10, 1989
TOWNS at 20:52 EDT
Sorry.. The TT is still under development and we can not release
specifications on the machine until it is announced formally. Once
that happens, you can ask away!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 3 Sun Jun 11, 1989
R.MOYER1 at 08:15 EDT
Oh, I was under the impression that it was pending release anytime now and
that everyone else new about it except me.....;-)
Oh well, go ahead and TPUrge this topic then if you wish, thanks.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 4 Sun Jun 11, 1989
M.MCCANN2 at 11:59 EDT
R.MOYER1: If you will check back issues of ST Report, you will find ALL sorts
of speculation about the TT. As for MT, it is supposed to run Unix 5.3.1, I
believe was the rumor; is that MT enough? And also (I presume) supposed to
have TOS 1.4 in ROM, as I have heard it said it runs Dungeonmaster (blindingly
fast, I presume). If it runs that, it would have to be extremely ST-
compatible...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 5 Sun Jun 11, 1989
C.DAYMON at 20:09 EDT
R.MOYER1,
You also may look into the messages and articles discussing the ATW
(previously know as the Abaq). There was an article in a past Byte issue.
Parallel processing and blinding speed with VERY high-end graphics ability.
It is currently shipping in europe. (1024x768 with 256 colors from a 16
million pallette, 1280x960 with 16 from the same pallette and two other
resolutions including one where, I think, all 16 million colors can be used at
once - given that many pixels.) It runs the Helios operating system which is
supposed to be a very Unix-like operating system for parallel processing and
comes with X-Windows. Don't hold me to the accuracy of this information cause
several things have changed since the first article, but I think most of this
is still true.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 6 Sun Jun 11, 1989
BREHBOCK at 22:30 CDT
Quick vote everybody! I vote this topic be closed until the TT is formally
announced. It will keep rumours down and let John stay on top of current
topics (like the ATW :-) !)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 7 Sun Jun 11, 1989
G.E.M. at 23:10 PDT
Nah, if you close it down someone will just open another one. I vote that it
be left open, that way it all stays in one place.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 8 Mon Jun 12, 1989
GORDON at 19:58 EDT
Rumers.... Rumers.... Rumers.... Rumers.... Rumers.... Rumers...
TO Fuel the fires... The reason 1.4 is being delayed is to make sure it works
on the TT!!! There for any software that runs under 1.4 on the Megas and STs
will run on the TT. (not multitasking)
But the TT is supposed to run UNIX.. Unix is multitasking..
TT is months away... I mean common Atari announced the Stacy in April with a
June delivery date and now hope they will have it out in September if the TT
is not announced yet it is MONTHS...
But I think it will be worth waiting for... (THat is if we don't have to wait
to long)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 9 Mon Jun 12, 1989
TOWNS at 22:19 EDT
I am sorry to ask this.. but, what is the POINT of that last message
Gordon?
I am missing something? If so, please tell me.
And let me clear things up.. TOS 1.4 is NOT being delayed for UNIX or
Multi-Tasking capabilities. In fact, it is NOT being delayed at all..
We are working as fast as we can to get a release to dealers to upgrade
the existing userbase. As soon as we have an OFFICAL release date on
this product, we will pass it along.
-- John Townsend
Atari Corporation
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 10 Mon Jun 12, 1989
TLMAY [Terry May] at 19:29 PDT
Gordon,
You seem to imply that TOS 1.4 is still under development... Didn't John say
that it's at the MANUFACTURING plant???
;^)
Darn things take awhile to burn, no?
-=<Terry May>=-
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 11 Tue Jun 13, 1989
TOWNS at 02:14 EDT
Yes, there is a significant lead time on these things.. We are
working on improving this as we speak..
-- John Townsend
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 12 Tue Jun 13, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 12:52 EDT
Burning ROMS do take about 2 months...
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 13 Tue Jun 13, 1989
C.DAYMON at 18:54 EDT
I hate to say this now because TT development seems to be so far along, but it
would really be great to see the TT come out with the Renderman interface
routines in ROM. That would sure set the TT above the Mac IIx and give Atari
a great "IN" to the graphics community. (This, of course, would be in
addition to TOS 1.4 in ROM.) From the little I know of the Renderman
interface, it seems that some of the routines could even share code with the
TOS graphic routines. My understanding is that it is a software interface to
provide portable function names to many high-end graphic routines. If Atari
wanted to bypass licensing fees with Pixar, they could even provide the
functions with different names and then 3rd party compiler developers could
provide links to the functions with names that were Renderman compatible.
Actually, I'm not really sure Pixar expects a licensing fee.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 14 Wed Jun 14, 1989
GRIBNIF at 00:38 EDT
Craig,
Write the routines into C libraries and sell them to developers.
Rick
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 15 Wed Jun 14, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 18:27 MDT
A friend of mine just got a Mac IIX (with a 68030) and a color monitor, and a
65 meg hardd rive for $4500!! He has me drooling, except that I still don't
like Mac's OS and how they handle graphics(thru software in ROM no less!!!).
So, I don't want no Mac IIX, I wannna TT!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 16 Thu Jun 15, 1989
TOWNS at 01:56 EDT
$4500.00? I find that hard to believe. Sounds like he got an _extremely_ good
price or something..
As for TT, wait and see... I think you will like it.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 17 Thu Jun 15, 1989
S.JOHNSON10 at 02:34 EDT
But will the TT still be available by September? Or is it more likely to be
delayed until sometime next year?!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 18 Thu Jun 15, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 09:03 EDT
He probably got the developer price. Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 19 Thu Jun 15, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 22:18 MDT
TOWNS:
My Mac friend got the Mac iix, used, from a desperate ASU student.
The student had just graduated and needed the bucks more then the
computer. So, my Mac friend was just in the right place at the
right time.
Who knows, maybe the ASU student will buy an ST with his $$$ !!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 20 Sat Jun 17, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 23:14 MDT
hmmm OK, there isn't much available info. on the TT, well is there a section
around here to discuss the ATW? Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 21 Sun Jun 18, 1989
A.RICHARDSO7 [ATW MAN!] at 21:38 EDT
I would welcome an ATW column with wide open arms! It was last reported
shipping in Europe and lately going into the hands of US developers. If that
info is correct, someone should be able to comment responsibly on its actual
capabilities, characteristics, and quirks. Sysops: What do you think??
Andy Richardson
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 22 Tue Jun 20, 1989
T.ONDERS [Tim Onders] at 19:03 EDT
Canadian developers have had ATW's for 4 months or so now =)
-Tim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 23 Tue Jun 20, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:26 PDT
And what have they to say ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 24 Tue Jun 20, 1989
BREHBOCK at 23:38 CDT
Ok, ok, as long as the topic's open... John, have you heard about somebody
(big... Pheonix, QMS?) putting PostScript to raster conversion in a PostScript
co-processor? Sounds like a shoe-in for display PostScript on the TT. Looks
like the Stever (Jobs) may have missed the boat by 6 months.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 25 Wed Jun 21, 1989
QMI at 01:36 EDT
With the new prices on the Sun 3/80, SPARCStation 1 and Sun 386i, I can't
understand why Atari would continue with TT development. Even Apple is
wondering what to do with a IIcx priced about the same as the Sun and the
equaly-priced Sun runs about twice as fast as the Mac IIx's. If Atari can
price a fully-equiped TT (80Meg HD, large monitor, 4M RAM with all ports) at
$4000 retail (and a 40% dealer margin) they might be able to move them. They
will need to pick up big name dealer support like Sun just did with
ComputerLand. Just call me skeptical!
I just saw the Sun 8-bit graphics co-processor card (~$2000) and there are
no words to descibe it. It is a fraction of the cost of any board that
attempts to do hi-speed 2D+ hardware hooked directly into an OS. The Mac has
nothing close. It takes less than a screen retrace time to redraw a complete
complex large-window drawing (in other words, you can't see it drawing!).
Well, it does require 8Megs of RAM. But at about $15,000 complete system
price, noone else comes close.
Back to reality. (My mother told me never to stare at the 'Sun' to long).
JD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 26 Wed Jun 21, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 10:08 EDT
I agree with you there John, the workstation marketis in for a shakedown. Now
if Atari had come out with it when I saw it two years ago...
I'll bet that the TT doesn't cost less than $5000 either.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 27 Wed Jun 21, 1989
GORDON at 15:44 EDT
John if Atari does not continue developing the TT what are they going to do?
The Mega and ST design is going on 5 years old. IT
is old techonolgy. They will not be able to sell it for much longer. When
the ST was introduced the IBM was selling a 8088 cpu
called the XT. Mac was still on the original 128K itty bitty
expensive cpu. Now IBM is selling 80386's that fly (the 286 was
also introduced in there someplace) Mac is selling a bigger and
faster cpu. (lets see they had a Mac SE and A MAc II) even the
Amiga has came out with a 68020 board and has shown (but not sold
) a 68030 board. Atari either comes out with a TT soon or they
get out of the computer business!
The world has passed them buy and left them.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 28 Thu Jun 22, 1989
QMI at 00:16 EDT
Gordon: exactly right... either Atari has a killer 68030 machine now and at
$4000 complete, they are out of the computer business. Based on past
experiences, I don't think they have a chance. Even if the hardware is above
average (Atari computers usually are solid on the technical design) the
support and marketing will be lacking as usual.
Mark: Anybody that stay in touch with the market trends has to be blind not
to see the handwriting on the wall. Us little guys in the trenches seem to
know more than Atari does... but I still have a firm desire to see them
succeed. I've made a big investment over the last 4 years and would like to
get something in return.
The computer race is more than price/performance these days. The ones that
are winning have a rare combination of marketing skills and are willing to
make a long-term investment in all aspects of support: dealer, developer,
user and specialty markets. IBM succeeds only in sheer size (I think they fail
in most other areas). Apple seems to be committed in all the areas. Sun has
the right combination and are extending that to the higher end microcomputer
market. When I think about what Atari has succeded in doing, I rank them down
around Coleco and XYZ no-name clone company.
C'mon Atari, make a liar out of me!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 29 Thu Jun 22, 1989
WHITESTR at 18:15 PDT
Hmmmm...I figured a year ago that Atari Higher-ups (read Mr. L and
brothers) were finding themselves in the throws of a serious marketing
dilemna...--> Do we break into the US market with a _really_ serious
tool, our Transputer Workstation, or
--> Do we 'downgrade' the workstation's tooling to a level
which should fit into the advanced home business
computer user slot?
Problem was two fold. Number one, as made clear by public Atari Corp.
statements (Sam T. and Neil H.), it has been evident to everyone who
follows the industry closely that the American computer using public
has been getting progressively more demanding with regards to power
and high-end graphics. As a CD-ROM developer, for instance, it is clear
that what people really expect in multi-media entertainment/education
is TV quality graphics with synchonized sound...plus, of course, glich
free interaction. I recall being told by the head of Atari's CD-ROM
project at the time that what I would _really_ want to be developing
for was their upcoming TT.
However, even a 68030 chip can handle real time video processing only
so well. And is that TT meant to be for the 'developer/professional'
or for the passive consumer also? Perhaps the consumer just needs high
res graphics and good sound and a *no-more-than-fast-enough* chip set
to passively (more or less) play back applications. Such a current
computer shouldn't have to cost over $2-3000 should it?
Which brings us to the second half of this dilemna. If the TT is meant
to be a 'consumer' machine, than we're talking _real_ serious 'Business
is War' price cutting. What with the way we all knew even a year ago
that the workstation market was getting very competitive, it seemed that
breaking into the US jaded home computer mindset required graphic power
(at least as good as the old TV) for a truly affordable price
(read ...not $4-5000 which is what all the 'other' companies would be
shooting for). If that is so, than perhaps the high-end developers and
professionals should be catered to first (read ATW) 'cause without those
developers pushing the envelope (who naturally want the most power and
*long-term non-obsolescence*) there is no way there is going to be
entertainment and consumer oriented projects developed which make use of
the current capabilities of hardware like CD-ROM or CD-I and hi res color.
So, now we see possible major boo-boo, which reads keep ATW out of US
market so that it doesn't upstage the TT, but oh no, the TT now looks
like it will shine dimly compared to the Sun and other rising stars, but
since the high-end ATW is being kept somewhere in the stratosphere (read
the European Elites) the TT must play ATW's role in the US with price
and hype to match, but the developers/hackers/real-creative-people no
longer will think the TT worth the money compared to its competitors and
know damn well that it is going to be rapidly bypassed by RISC technology
and truly capable graphic machines (again, needed for efficient animation
and high res graphic and CD work...just listen to all the hassle the Mac
II people have had trying to get their computers to gracefully do TV
quality work.)
Sooooo......thank goodness the ATW is finally being ADMITTED
in the US marketplace, at least to a few developers and occasionally
in public (such as the Canadian notice posted earlier)....and lets
hope Atari recognizes just how ruthlessly the consumers and developers
are beginning to play this field of information technology...few of us
will put up with the short end of the stick for reasons of blind
loyalty and hyped conviction.
Dai Le'on (sorry about the rambling length....I'll stay off the
soapbox for a while....(:)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 30 Fri Jun 23, 1989
GORDON at 10:18 EDT
Lots of interesting points.. In your statement.. But how is Atari
going to sell into the workstation market? They do not have the sales force,
the service dept, or the mentality to do this. Atari likes to call up Kmart,
Sears etc and sell 50,000 machines to them
and not have people call them up and ask dumb questions.
I takes a whole differnt outlook to sell $5000 computers then it does $300
portfollios or $150 hand held game machines.. Atari will do much better with
the latter!!
The way the company is set up now they will never be able to successfully
sell a high priced computer!
Think about this.. If Atari was a new company with no past reputation, no
user base, the amount of advertising they had (none!)
how many ST's do you think they would have sold? Not very many..
The game machines made the ST..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 31 Fri Jun 23, 1989
QMI at 23:31 EDT
"Blue light special in isle 12 on Un*x boxes!"...
I suppose Atari management must be smart enough to know that the TT needs a
whole new way of doing business. I know they can design a good machine and
have it made cheaply but after that I start to worry.
For this machine, the game image and name recognition will be outweighed on
the bad side... at the name recognition helped sell the ST and bring along 8-
bit owners. The university crowd and the scientific community would rather see
a new brand name with a great price. Atari should do what Panasonic did on
stereo equipment around the early '70's... they had a problem being considered
as a cheap transistor radio company... they used the Technics brand name in
the US (National in other countries) and had a small "by Panasonic" under it.
After they had some success marketing it, they took the Panasonic off
altogether. Atari should start a new division (possibly team up with a well-
known Un*x software house for support), create a new name (ACME computers
would even be better!) and dispose of the Atari brand when ever PR makes sense
to do so.
John <the dime-store management consultant> DeMar
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 32 Sat Jun 24, 1989
TLMAY [Terry May] at 00:13 PDT
John,
I agree...a new name is necessary for the _general_ public to take the Atari
computers seriously. Atari can't keep depending on former Atari users and
their friends for support.
Your analogy of Panasonic was a good one.
-=<Terry May>=-
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 33 Sat Jun 24, 1989
WHITESTR at 09:21 PDT
As to some marketing ideas concerning the ATW and TT, Gordon, here's what
I would suggest...
First, immediately drop any intentions to con the hacker/artist
entrepreneur into committing to long-term education/entertainment
development based solely on the TT as his/her primary workstation tool.
Second, package the TT similarly to the ST, i.e. as a consumer product
with the basic ports needed to plug in mail-order parts, with a generic
graphical interface (*must* go beyond vanilla X-Windows), with 'neat-o'
sound and VGA comparable monitor. In other words, give 'em just enough.
(Certainly, Un!x was a smart move, as was TOS compatibility.)
Next, let it be known that the TT is replacing the ST as the standard
model in the Atari line. With that position comes the assurance
that the TT will be gradually upgraded, that its marketing will be
handled similiarly to the ST's except for a major change in advertising
policy (i.e. same level of customer support, continued attempt to sell
through upmarket dedicated stores <--grant it, limited progress here,
but the TT would be considerably more attractive for the retailer) and
that in return for buying Atari, the end-user gets generic power for a
very affordable price.
Simple enough, nothing too threatening to current corporate patterns...
And while this public position is rapidly being consolidated, Atari
needs a secret weapon, appropriated into the hands of a distinctly
Atari circle, the interdisciplinary hacker. Now I know not everyone
is going to agree with me here, but, from my observations, there exists
a circle of ST users (along with Mac and Amiga) whose primary interests
lie not in rudimentary (or obscure) computational techno-stuff nor in the
drab complexities of 'business', but in the ARTS and HUMANITIES!
So I suggest that US Atari puts together a somewhat European imported
working group (likely stationed in Canada, actually) of inter-
disciplinary ATW folk to explicitly offer developer/high-end user
support for the sort of work which is portable and down-grade-able
to the masses through VGA level personal computers, CD-ROM, and possibly
CD-I machines or the entertainment specific players of the future.
Characters such as Tim Oren come to mind.
Is not this what NEXT and Jobs are attempting? Small is appropriate in
this case...takes a sort of interest and intelligence and vision
which goes a bit beyond just technical leadership (Sam T. spends time
in Canada, yes?)
Thus, to sum up...marketing of the TT is no problem if Atari doesn't
try to make too much out of it. Marketing of the ATW must extend into
multimedia (even IBM recently embraced multimedia _very_ strongly tho
only from the long-term potential of DVI) and involve not only the
sciences but the arts and humanities also (journalistic possibilites
with these tools are enormous, if not obvious...I'm thinking here of
the de-centralization of the film and TV and research industries.) This
is likely only going to happen if US Atari and Overseas Atari can co-opt
possibly through Canada Atari (hope Julius didn't quit because of
policies which make this scenario totally unlikely.)
Dai Le'on
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 34 Sat Jun 24, 1989
QMI at 12:43 EDT
That SOUNDS all well and good but Atari builds for mass marketing and the
low price prevents them from being too sophisticated with the support, etc.
The 'cerebral' approach you're talking about might work for the ATW but that's
not the critical machine for Atari to be profitable. The transputer could wake
up some high-end users to the TT but the only way I see Atari making headway
in the next year is to team up with a UN*X support company, and get the thing
out soon! They will need a mainstreamed, consistent, continuous
marketing/advertising effort and NOT depend on enthusiasts and word-of-mouth
to sell the thing!
John <what makes him such an authority?> DeMar
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 35 Sat Jun 24, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 14:22 EDT
Sorry, but I really can't see them pulling it off. You can run a Amiga with a
68030 in it, and they have sold over 1,000,000 machines now. Apple now has
the Mac IIcx (it's a beauty) and they will have a 33 mhz '030 machine out this
year. Atari once said they would have a new machine out every 6 months.
Apple has a new one out every four! And they are being taken seriously by the
business and scientific community.
Suns are getting cheaper too. I really can't see Atari breaking to the
workstation market. Maybe two years ago...
If they can come out with a _cheap_ 68030 St, then maybe. But I don't see
them doing that. Problem is, the market's caught up with Atari. They have
always known how to make inexpensive machines. But now the market has become
much more complex and saturated. Other people know how to make cheap machines
too (Apple is an example with the IIcx). And the rest have been forced into
lowering their prices.
The same thing happened with the consumer electronics field (radios and
such). The first Walkman cost $200.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 36 Sat Jun 24, 1989
TOWNS at 19:42 EDT
At the Fall Comdex in Las Vegas, Sam stated that we were shipping
between 60,000 and 70,000 units worldwide per month (depending on
the month) of ST/MEGA computers.
We have been doing this for sometime. I think we have well over a
1,000,000 units out there.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 37 Sun Jun 25, 1989
QMI at 01:35 EDT
John,
He also stated that only 10% of the ST's were being shipped to the U.S.
market... leaving 6000 to 7000 per month here. Knowing what has went on
between Fall COmdex and now, I would say the numbers are far less than that
today. With about 200 active dealers left, and buying 10 machines a month on
average, I would say the number is more like 2000/month in the US! If I could
login to your billing system on your VAX, I bet these numbers wouldn't be far
off. Let's get moving!
We know more ST's are being shipped outside the US, so where are they going?
I talked with a manager at Atari UK who said they are selling mostly as a game
machine (actually bundling games and advertising that fact!). Told me the
market for applications is very slow. I wouldn't doubt that Germany is getting
a good percentage of them but they only buy harware and blank disks! I have
heard from several different sources that the dealers sell blanks, hand out
copy programs, and let you have anything you want and copy iy right in the
store!
I know this is the TT topic but you brought it up. I'm only bringing out
these pesimistic fact in order for someone to turn things around the other
way. There is no room for error with the TT when competing with the likes of
Apple and Sun! Apple can sell 50,000 Mac II's a month and they're a $6000
machine, not a $800 ST.
John <whining again> DeMar
PS: At the rate Atari was going when the ST first shipped, there should be a
RISC-based lap-top machine with a holographic display buy now!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 38 Sun Jun 25, 1989
M.LOADER1 [Mike Loader] at 00:18 PDT
Atari ads in Canada say that there are over 1.2 million ST's out there.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 39 Sun Jun 25, 1989
P.MCCULLOUGH at 14:10 EDT
Is the $+4500 Unix TT intended for the home market? If so- it will fail- No
home consumer will spend above $2000 for a home computer. (In fact, even a
large screen TV in this price range is difficult to move!) I think the Unix
TT is a silly idea- businesses just won won't buy Atari computers- period. I
think a better alternative would be the cancellation of the Mega ST-2, and
520ST along with lower pricing on the 1040ST (Better if Atari makes it into a
Mega ST1!) and on the Mega ST4 (Greater draw on DTP sales-). This would place
the 1040/Mega ST1 in the 520ST niche, the Mega ST4 into the Mega ST2 niche
(Albeit with a slightly higher price-) and allow the TT (w/o Unix) to fill the
Mega ST4 slot (At around the current suggested pricing of the Mega ST4). As
for the ATW- sell it to Universities w/o the Atari name on it- lets face it
the name hurts. Look how Commodore marketed the Amiga without pushing their
name until the computer had a committed market. (This may be a good idea for
the TT, too. Or create a spin-off company for marketing these machines-) I
believe D-RAM prices and other IC costs have fallen (and continue to fall)
enough to justify a price decrease for these machines- and wasn't it Jack
Tramiel who chastised IBM and Apple for high prices not too long ago? This
looks for a fine opportunity to repeat history, and bring Atari back as a
solid competitor.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 40 Sun Jun 25, 1989
TOWNS at 17:00 EDT
John,
Your numbers and figures are way off.. I will leave it at that.
As for TT marketing.. no one has stated the market position of
such a machine publicly. How can any expect me to comment on the
intended market for such a machine.
When TT is announced formally, then we can start to discuss the
type of market it will compete in. Until that happens, this is
all just guesswork.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 41 Sun Jun 25, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 16:42 MDT
A few things here...first, the TT should be marketed exactly like the NeXT
machine is being handled. They both sound like they would target similar
markets. The ATW should be marketed as tose new Sun Sparcs stations. OK, easy
right? :-) Atari needs to do more of what Apple did with the Mac and like
what Jobbes (was that spelled right?) is doing with the NeXT. Have big press
conferences with flashy demos and get the people interestead. The NeXT was a
rather bland machine and I think that the TT would be a good competitor. As
far as the ATW is concerned, we are getting more tricky. The ATW cannot be
sold through the normal local dealers, It must be distributed by the big
names such as Computerland as well as any local Atari dealers that want to
carry it, but the normal Atari dealers don't get the right custommers. I also
feel that the Atari 8-bit and games section should keep the Atari name, but
the 16 and 32 bit computers should get a different one. Atari's main problem
AGAIN is marketing. I have given many speeches about how bad it is and how
they can improve it, but I don't feel like doing that now. All I can say is
that the TT should be present to fight it out with tthe NeXT machine, but the
ATW needs special attention, and to get out fast! Here is a possable marketing
suggestion. The ATW should be offered in a "bundled" form. Unlike the STs
where the person buys the computer and then the neccessary hardware and
software, the ATW should come in different forms for the specific job it is to
do. For example, if it were to be used as a CAD system (I think I read that
someone was using it to design cars), sell it with the maximum graphics
available, a large amount of ram the best math and 3-D coordinate
coprocessors, and offer discounts, or at least reccomend certain software
packages. The people who are going to buy the ATW are not going to be like
the people who buy STs and can help themselves to whatever software they like,
they don't want to shop, they just want to buy. They could really care less
whether it was an IBM, or an Atari as long as the Atari could support certain
starndards. They would be more inclined to buy an IBM because they have heard
of it, but this type of people would buy an Atari if it made sense and was an
easy purchase. In other words, they would not be willing to drive a long d
distance to their nearest dealer, buy the computer, and then mail order
software. They would want to make one purchase of computer/software, and only
contact the dealer for support/help or to upgrade. Wow for not wanting to talk
about marketing, I sure did. Thud--there, I fell of the soapbox, Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 42 Sun Jun 25, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 16:43 MDT
.........oh by the way, I would like to see a ATW topic, I'm not much of a
Unix person myself......... Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 43 Sun Jun 25, 1989
A.RICHARDSO7 [ATW MAN!] at 21:39 EDT
My 2 cents: ATW all the way!! The ATW is Atari's best product. It is
rumored to carry a reasonable price tag. All it needs is quality peripera
oops peripherals and software. Marketing would be easy -- anyone who sees it
will want to buy it if you show it properly! The ATW should be Atari's next
bread and butter product.....
Andy Richardson
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 44 Sun Jun 25, 1989
M.MCCANN2 at 21:52 EDT
Hmm...Honda has Acura, and I think Nissan and Toyota are in process of goin
same (upscale) route. Infiniti? et al. Cadillac? Lincoln? Is ATW the
"Cadillac" of Ataris?? What's an ST, a Ford? A PC4, Chevy?? A 2600, a Yugo???
;^)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 45 Mon Jun 26, 1989
TOWNS at 02:12 EDT
Feel free to start a ATW topic if you would like.. I would like to
see some discussions on the computer as well.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 46 Mon Jun 26, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 23:20 MDT
TOWNS:
A local TV station had a piece on the NeXT computers that the
local university (Az State U ASU) got. anyway, it was amazing just
how impressed they were with a machine that doesn't even have color!!
Now, if only Atari could get the TT out and into the Universities like
ASU, maybe we could finally get some respect for Atari computers!!
So, what's the marketing plans for the TT?? Are you all going to push
TTs to universities and colleges??
Is Atari going to try to line up some big shops like ComputerLand or
BussinessLand to sell the TTs??
Because, as much as I like my local ST dealer, I just can't see him selling a
$6K+ UNIX computer!!! Most of the ST dealers just have enough expertise to
sell STs or maybe Amigas!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 47 Tue Jun 27, 1989
S.JOHNSON10 at 03:13 EDT
It seems as if the TT won't be available for quite some time(early 1990,
perhaps?)! Atari always seems to release new stuff long after everyone else
hasreleased theirs! It looks as if the ATW is the only thing Atari has going
for it, and that's not a home computer, at least for MOST homes it isn't! It
also looks as if all Atari's DON'T SAY ANYTHING policy does is gets Atari
users absolutely frustrated! I know Atari THINKS they know what they're
doing, but do they REALLY? /s
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 48 Tue Jun 27, 1989
GORDON at 11:11 EDT
I think QMI's numbers are more accurate then yours Towns.. 70,000
a month.. no way. Thats 840,000 a year. Atari is not selling that
many ST's. Maybe ST's and 8 bits added together..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 49 Tue Jun 27, 1989
GORDON at 11:12 EDT
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 51 Tue Jun 27, 1989
GORDON at 12:15 EDT
Yes, But by Atari announcing theirs early they get to set the price for
everyone. <grin>
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 52 Tue Jun 27, 1989
HS [Holly] at 15:26 EDT
Oh, I'm sorry... but I do find it VERY amusing that all you guys outside are
telling someone who actually works for the company what the company's sales
figures are... *laugh*
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 53 Tue Jun 27, 1989
QMI at 18:32 EDT
Towns,
I will stick by my estimates because I have first-hand information to back
it up. The fact that Atari doesn't brag about the numbers is proof itself. I
think you will find any developer who is willing to admit it will tell you
that sales are at an all-time low and would agree with my numbers. Disagreeing
with us will not change the facts.
I understand completely that Atari needs to put on a front to keep things
from getting worse than they already are... and I agree with that in
principal. But, I hear that Sig is complaining about the bad press and the
pesimistic views in the Atari community and wants everyone to change their
tone. That's almost insulting! It's past the point where people are willing to
stand behind Atari with nothing happening. If Sig's request had followed a
significant new release by Atari, I would have praised it highly and passed on
the word to every disbeliever.
Back to the topic at hand. I think this topic should continue (TT)
regardless of the fact that Atari hasn't officially announced the product.
The TT is too significant to wait until AFTER Atari announces to give them
some feedback... now is the time to make the engineering and marketing changes
necessary to make it a success. If Atari does not value the insight of
developers and users who may know a few things Atari hasn't had the time or
circumstance to learn about, just say so and we'll shut-up. Until then, I will
assume that Towns is passing along the information, doing his best to quote
the current company line (as he should) and some good will come out of it.
Conclusions? 1) Everyone agrees that the 68030/TT and ATW need to be
marketed under a new, non-Atari up-scale name. My example was the
Panasonic/Technics success; I also like the example of Honda/Acura and other
car companies with up-scale brand names. 2) The after-market support is
critical to the success of a Unix machine or transputer; Atari needs a co-
operative established software/support company to jump in head first with them
from day one. I don't think they have the time to hire and train a support
staff like they have done with the development staff. 3) The price point is
not the significant factor for Atari to stand on. The current pricing from
Sun, HP, DEC and others was not expected when the TT was first conceived. Time
for a new game plan. 4) Do all the above soon! (before new factors come
along.)
John <hoping for the best> DeMar
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 54 Tue Jun 27, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 18:51 EDT
I admit that Sigs comments offended me. Sorry Atari, I'm not going to be a
cheerleader unless you give me something to cheer about. Us developers have
put everything on the line for a very long time, and Atari shows us little
concern.
For example, Sig says don't be negative, yet I hear that the Dearborn show
wasn't advertised as much as planned because Atari didn't put up the co-op
money it promised. If that's true it sounds like the same old Atari to me.
I hope you've seen a real change, Holly, and that your sales are good
(considering the summer). I don't like what the distributors are telling me
at all. They say Atari dealer sales are way down, and business is bad.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 55 Wed Jun 28, 1989
HS [Holly] at 00:24 EDT
Maybe time to move this thread to 18...
Mark, we probably aren't breaking any sales records so far this summer, but
we're not dying on the vine either, which is good news, I guess. We're not a
big store, so we can't afford too big of a slump. Our favorite distributor
also said that it's slow, but that everything is slow... and it generally is
slower in summer. We had already figured that part out fortunately. :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 56 Wed Jun 28, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 10:45 EDT
That's good news Holly. Actually I checked into this months sales yesterday.
It took extra effort, but this month was far better than last, was actually a
pretty good month.
Summertime is slower. It's the perfect opportunity for Atari to get it
together. But if they wait until the fall it will be too late.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 57 Wed Jun 28, 1989
GORDON at 15:12 EDT
You have to remember Towns is the guy who said the STacy would be on sale in
the dealer near you on June 15th! At the WA show they did not even have a pre
production model! (That was June 25th)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 58 Wed Jun 28, 1989
GORDON at 15:13 EDT
Holly who do you think is closer to the truth, Towns or QMI???
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 59 Wed Jun 28, 1989
HS [Holly] at 15:40 EDT
Well, quite honestly, Gordon, in my eyes, QMI has very little creditability.
I have a real problem trusting anything from a company that promises via Email
and over the phone for 3 months to send you something as simple as literature
so maybe you can sell their product for them, yet never does it. At least when
Towns has told me he'd send me something, he's done it. But, the point that
you missed is that it seems to me that John would certainly have access to
more complete and more accurate information about sales figures than a company
whose products failed to make headway in the ST market for whatever reason,
like perhaps shipping a year late or so...
Your mileage may vary, but that's what things look like from where I'm
sitting.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 60 Wed Jun 28, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] at 18:08 EDT
This does belong in 18 but I must say that sales figures are just speculation
and perhaps Atari wants them to be that??? I give up trying to figure it out.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 61 Thu Jun 29, 1989
TOWNS at 02:26 EDT
I refuse to get involved in this discussion any further. I stand
behind what I have said here and have nothing to add to it.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 62 Thu Jun 29, 1989
QMI at 13:05 EDT
Holly,
I assumed you received the information long ago. CSS and Triangle Elec
carry DeskCart and ST-Talk Pro. This isn't the topic to discuss QMI's sales
and future... we're trying to analyze the current state of affairs at Atari
and where they will be going with the ST/TT. As one of the last Atari dealers
in the U.S. (and a relatively new one), you have the right to feel defensive
at whomever who can take a shot at. The sales figures I've estimated are based
on the number of dealers left who are willing to carry Atari ST products (not
just QMI products).
So, as this topic says: What about the TT? Well, to make sure I wasn't off
in left field with my ideas about marketing the TT, I passed the idea by a few
people. One of them is a purchasing agent for a large university, a couple of
them are senior engineers and managers for General Electric, and another is a
partner in a consulting engineering firm. Given the estimated price and
specification of an 'Atari Un*x workstation', I asked if they would consider
purchasing one or recommending one. The answer was unanimously: no. Then,
hypothestically, if the computer was marked with a new brand name and support
could be found through normal channels (Un*x software houses, high-end
resellers), they said either: sounds like it would be competitive; or we'll
get one and compare it to HP's, Sun's and MacII's we have.
It has to do mostly with making a comfortable, safe decision. Most people
aren't willing to take a chance with their business, or their job or their
reputation by recommending a name which is associated with games. If it's a
home computer, people are either buying a dedicated game machine or a PC-
compatible (again, the safe decision). There will always be a few people
willing to shop for the best equipment purely by technical criteria... I don't
think those people make a big enough crowd to market to for either the low end
or high end. Some heavy (ie: expensive) marketing and advertising is needed to
change the way people think.
JD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 63 Fri Jun 30, 1989
HS [Holly] at 00:12 EDT
I was asked who I believed more, and I answered given my experience with both
companies. No "shots" were intended. As stated it was my view based on my
experiences. (But as a side note, I don't see how you could have thought I
received the material when my last message to you, after numerous others,
stated that I was no longer interested in your products because I didn't feel
that a company that could not even make literature available was going to be
able to support their products.)
In any respect, there is at least one new dealer in this area (Kokomo, to be
exact), and another who is looking to set up shop. In addition, we've been in
business over a year, so I hardly thinks that makes us one of the more recent.
However, I agreed with whomever suggested the idea a while ago that the TT and
the ATW (and possibly the entire computer line) would benefit from being
marketed under a subdivision name. On the other hand, I have recently been
talking to some of the folks at the university here, and there seems to be no
small amount of interest in the new machines, even (and perhaps especially)
right down to Stacy. The Portfolio has perhaps made people take a second
glance towards Atari, and perhaps if Atari Corp can follow up with several
successful releases in a row, credibility can once again be renewed. That
issue was, I believe, heavy on the minds of many dealers I spoke to at WOA.
The TT does indeed have some capabilities that might set it apart, and,
hopefully, above other machines.
Do I think it will happen? Yes, but unfortunately not in the way I wish it
would. Deadlines being what they generally are in this business, I wouldn't
plan on seeing the TT's release here until mid-1990. I'd like nothing more
than to have Atari Corp make a liar out of me on it, but I'm not holding my
breath. But I also think it will end up being released under the Atari
label... which, if released on time, may or may not be a mistake. A bang-up
job on the TT could mean renewed interest in the rest of the computer line.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 64 Fri Jun 30, 1989
S.NOAH at 00:03 PDT
With all the talk about new machines going on, perhaps we should ask
ourselves where all of these new machines are going to be built. This isn't a
new question, but it is a timely one. As far as I know Atari is still
operating only one producion facility, the plant in Taiwan. Will this facility
be able to satisfy the production requirements entailed in developing all
these new devices ( eg. ATW, TT, STacy, portable game machine, etc. ).
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 65 Fri Jun 30, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 11:48 EDT
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Atari was selling 3-5K machines a month. I
don't think it's much less (or else we have a large market share!) but I don't
think it's much higher either. I do know that Atari's production was low last
year, and that they increased early this year. I don't have any idea on if
more machines are being shipped or warehoused though.
I think naming the TT (or whatever) "Atari" would be the curse of death
though. Maybe it would have worked if they did a better job on the ST.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 66 Fri Jun 30, 1989
HS [Holly] at 15:02 EDT
Mark,
I think you said it to me elsewhere when you noted that when the ST first
came out, it looked as if it would be the next messiah. The machine was good,
solid and at a great price. If Atari had run with it then, I don't think it
would have been touchable. Unfortunately, I don't think the TT has the same
technological quickstart that the ST had, so Atari really does have their
work cut out for them.
S.NOAH... the new game machine only carries the Atari name, I believe, and is
not actually manufactured by Atari Corp. Hmmm... I wonder if Atari could farm
out the manufacturing on the other equipment since they lack a US facility.
Interesting point made.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 67 Fri Jun 30, 1989
GORDON at 15:03 EDT
Last I heard the Portfolio and the P Game Machine are going to be made in
Japan. (contracted out)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 68 Fri Jun 30, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:13 EDT
I personally don't believe that having the Atari name on either the TT or the
ATW will affect interest. They are both reported to be very powerful machines
with features that set them apart from others. Look how many times articles
appear about the Amiga being used in video production work. And it is obvious
to everyone that it is a Commodore. I believe it is more the other way around,
that the ATW and the TT will bring greater recognition and prominance to the
Atari name. The real key for the ATW in particular is what kind of software
will appear to exploit its capabilities. There just aren't that many top
parallel programmers to go round. Although, I think most would jump at the
chance to work with a low-cost (market relative) parallel machine such as the
ATW. Hopefully, the TT won't be tied to a 16MHz 68030. I feel that would be
a mistake. Something along the lines of a 25MHz version would be better to
place it in the front running. Be nice to see both with built-in GENLOCK.
Considering the displays, this is something many people would be interested
in. As far as I know, the Atari market is still aimed at the Home/Personal
market, primarily. This market requires greater flexibility and more features
than the Professional/Business market coming right out of the box. After all,
I don't think you'll see Sun putting MIDI ports on their workstations any time
soon. It's about time we started to see systems that will remain on most if
not all of the day, handling different aspects of household control (such as
security) without keeping the owner from playing a game or writing a letter
(or new song).
I think the main point I babbling about is that you can't go to a university
or business and say, "Do you think you'll buy one of Atari's new machines?"
before the machines are out. If you had suggested to most of the engineers
that are now using Mac II's that they use an Apple for some of the things the
Mac II is being applied to before it was out, they probably would have
laughed. (And I have a good feeling that the Atari machines will look pretty
impressive next to the Mac II's, especially at half the price.)
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 69 Fri Jun 30, 1989
WHITESTR at 19:54 PDT
John D., your 'on the street' interviews sound like they reflect
actuality. However, I'm wondering just what price you suggested
the TT will go for. Herein lies the crux of whether the TT will
sell a 100,000 or 10,000 (at least initially.)
As someone looking to be able to do sophisticated art work and
visual processing, I know that built in ability to run TOS is quite
meaningless to me. And the Atari name is a definite minus (guess I
don't really expect corporate patterns to change with the TT...just isn't
a serious _enough_ machine.) If I have to spend $4-5000 for a base
unit with monitor, I will invest in a product which has a large base
of third-party developers (talking hardware here as much as software...)
Or, I'll intelligently look at how rapidly the market of Un!x stations
is dropping into an attitude of _real_ power without the price and purchase
for a little more an expandable RISC based system which isn't limited
to a rather paltry 256 colors on screen at once. After all, if I can
purchase an ATW from England this week for $8500 with quality monitor,
then I'm likely going to be able to purchase one later this year, when
(or if) the TT becomes available, for more like $6000 in the US. Why in
the world, given the fact that the ATW has tremendously more potential
than the TT, would I buy the lesser machine at only a 25-33% price
differential? Furthermore, (I'm registered developer #549, and joined
in over a year ago) there are hundreds of developers working on ATW
products _now_....Tim King (main partner of Perihelion Software and author
of Helios) visited us last year and from his accounts, the software
being successfully worked on for the ATW is 'beyond awesome'.
Now all of this changes radically if the TT is brought in with a nifty
but resolution-limited monitor (kinda like the ST, eh?) for *under*
$2500. In fact, if Atari markets the base unit without hd or monitor
for $1995...well, heh, I think these things will really take. Figure
in a little discounting and I think alot of ST people will be looking
to upgrade. Sell it to that slice of the education market which is
being forced to look at price as a prime consideration and I think the
*Atari* name will soon be seen as a positive once more (:)
Dai
p.s. I think that pushing for a 'name change' on either the TT ("you mean
the upgrade to the Atari ST?") or the Atari Transputer Workstation
(now selling in countries where that is a quite respectable name)
is barking up the wrong tree. Power Without the Price, is, from
my view, the WHOLE ISSUE.
p.s.s.John, thought I'd mention that my partners and I have been using
ST-Talk since it came out (and Pro, of course). We never touch
any other telecomm app.! Hope you do as nice of work on the next
machines...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 70 Sat Jul 01, 1989
P.MCCULLOUGH at 01:28 EDT
Atari's name could be on it- fine print on back of unit. Also, make the box
easily accessable (open arch.) and upgradeable- the biggest short-comings of
the ST/Mega line. John- didn't mean to offend by suggesting TT marketing, I
just think its time to "retire" some ST models (520ST, Mega 2- my CPU- no
favoritism here!) and to move the others into different niches. As things
stand, the proposed (Truly speculated-) prices of the TT will conflict on the
small Mega ST4 market. I do think that Atari's DTP package is brilliant- but
no one but Atari dealers and users know it exists. And the TT will boot :-)
the Mega ST4 out of DTP if just for its speed increase. One thing that I have
come to realize is that Atari isn't the only computer manufacturer climbing
the MAC/IBM mountain- Commodore is in BIG trouble right now. Local papers
(S. Jersey) recently reported that CBM suffered a 20+ point drop on the
American Stock Exchange- also, Amiga mags are beginning to grumble about the
revolving door at Commodore. (ie. Constant departures/arrivals of new
employees!) Sound familiar. Granted, Amiga is a stronger seller, but not a
devastator. I was also surprised to catch some disatisfaction over Amiga
models- evidently, people are grumbling that they want a less bulky model then
the 2000, but with the same power. Some are also complaining of over
saturation of the Amiga market. It is heartening to to see Atari making modest
gains and oddly, I have noticed a slow but steady increase in ST only stores
here in the Delaware valley. None of these were around a year ago when I was
searching desparately for a place to buy a Mega! One more note- Electronics
Boutique has evidently, for the 2nd time dropped the Amiga hard/software line.
Makes room for ST? TT?? ATW??? NAH! I do agree with others that the TT/ATW
systems should sell thru the professionals. Perhaps a non-business TT (Call
it ST-II or ST+) say in a Mega frame with say 2 megs for us poor folks could
be introduced? PVM
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 71 Fri Jun 30, 1989
S.NOAH at 23:09 PDT
Why not just produce the TT as an OEM UNIX BOX for computer stores ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 72 Sat Jul 01, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 15:44 MDT
Just so everyone is aware, a new ATW section has just been added!!! it is
topic 38 in this catagory! Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 73 Sat Jul 01, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 19:30 MDT
You all are talking like you *ACTUALLY* expect Atari to sell the TT in the
present configuration in the near future!! I would be very surprised to see
the TT before 1990, and then it will probably have a propretiary non-
expandable (aka Mega ST) buss that no one else will ever support!! Get real,
and just go out and buy a Mac IIX now!!! I can't see what the mythical TT is
supposed to have that you can't already get in a Mac IIX!!! And you get
support from Apple, which anyone has to say is better then the non-existent
support from Atari (I mean 2 years just to update the TOS ROMs???). Just some
thoughts from a person who still likes his two STs!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 74 Sat Jul 01, 1989
G.E.M. at 20:50 PDT
One thing the 'mythical' TT will have is a MUCH lower price tag than the
Macintrash.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 75 Sun Jul 02, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 10:23 MDT
G.E.M.
but will it have the third vendor support that the Mac enjoys?? I mean,
the Macs already have a CD ROM full of over 400 megs of PD Mac sw.
but, TOAD COMPUTERS is already selling a 44 meg removable hard drive,
for the ST, so there is some hope for ST third vendors out there!!
Did anyone check the statement from Sig Hartman at the WOA show that the TT
would be out by then end of the year, or he would quit?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 76 Sun Jul 02, 1989
QMI at 14:15 EDT
If anyone has captured the "TT" topic on Usenet, could you upload it to me?
G.E.M.
Calling the Mac "the Macintrash" is rediculous and lowers the seriousness
of our discussions. (Just because I can't afford a Ferrari, I don't call it
junk! But I do call my Oldsmobile nasty names every day!). The price of a Mac
reflects the unbelievable amount of support they offer to all segments of
their business. They have more employees than all of Atari US just to handle
the education market, for instance.
The MacIIcx will soon have a standard speed of 25MHz and by the time Atari
releases the TT, the industry will be at 30Mhz as a standard. More
importantly, RISC-based computers are coming down in price and are better
performers at 20MHz than a 68030 would be at several times the speed. I have
to assume that Atari will inevitably release the TT within a year and that the
price/features will be fairly close to the generally known description. These
assumption are based on knowing the time it would take to change the design
plans and the urgency of getting this product out in order for Atari to stay
in the running.
Current trends show that the "Power without the Price" way of doing business
(in the US anyways) doesn't work anymore. It's far more complicated than that,
with marketing methods being the most important. It would take forever to list
all of the factors and cost of doing it right is astronomical. Atari could
find a niche or two (as with MIDI on the ST) and sell quite a few TT's, but
the computer would never make it as a mainstream brand name without a
different name and all of the marketing/support etc.
JD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 77 Sun Jul 02, 1989
WHITESTR at 19:15 PDT
JD--since you've brought up the concept of complexity, perhaps I'll add
some notes regarding current marketing theory.
The information industry does not operate according to old theories
of 'diminishing returns'. The complexity involved with the pool of
information consumers is in fact *so* great, as to lend itself
mathematically and practically to a model of 'chaos'. Not to get
too snooty or abstract here, 'cause this stuff is lived as much in
Jack T.'s gut as it is in theorist's heads, but put squarely, it is
now understood that price/power/recognition of a given product can
literally 'snap' a market in totally unforeseen ways (<--read not
figured out through an analysis of 'diminishing returns'.)
To see the marketing of the TT in terms of very specific niche needs
is not to see it in terms of how it _is_ going to be marketed...to
the MASSES. Once the product has disrupted the field (and disruption
is a must) it _geometrically_ gains 'dominance' as the presense and
urgency of the product draws that attention which would otherwise be
attracted to another 'disruptor'. War in this field exists in a
context of instigated catastrophe, be that in specific niches or
specific societies. Advertising truly counts (propaganda is a must),
and there is a terrific amount of strength in the common-man position
of Power Without the Price. That one stance is good for a whole lot
of disruption, which is why the US computer establishment so shuns
even the mentioning of Jack Tramiel and the Atari Corporation.
The information business, addressing as it does the human intellect,
is premised on the intuition of 'increasing returns', not diminishing
ones, and Atari Corp. still shows signs of realizing that.
Le'on
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 78 Mon Jul 03, 1989
T.ONDERS [Tim Onders] at 23:58 EDT
One must also realize that, while the 'TT' will be partially aimed at the
market niche presently filled by the Macintosh II-whatevers, it will be more
closely matched with much stiffer competition, such as Sun, NeXT, and SGI.
The 'TT' is supposed to be a Unix box, which is something the Mac II does not
do particularly well (AUX is not terribly plesant). With the Sun 3/60 down
under $10K, and the SparcStation around $15K, the NeXT at $10K commercial, the
SGI Personal Iris starting at $12K, and 386i's for under $8K, Atari will be
entering a fierce market. The biggest danger, as I see it, is from Sun; a
company that will do anything to sell their systems. Unless the 'TT' is
particularly impressive, or particularly inexpensive, is probably will not do
well.
-Tim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 79 Tue Jul 04, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:32 EDT
But at the price of software for a Sun and for peripherals, I think there will
be plenty of room for the Atari machine. The great thing about Atari's
position in this area is that even more so than the Mac II (which I think
greatly surprised Sun) it will be ignored by the competition until it captures
a greater share of the market than expected. Sun is shifting their marketing
to compete with Mac II, I'll doubt they'll want to shift again to combat
Atari. Given the features reported for the TT and believing there may be a
few more surprises thrown in, I think Atari should be able to grab a
significant piece of the market. Remembering also that Atari is better
positioned to move quickly into the personal computer niche with the TT
(something Sun might find difficult or even ignore) and this machine will
surely be what people will soon expect from a personal computer. I hope there
are lots of great features because I think personal computing has the most
fascinating drive and I want to see what that share of the market can do with
such a machine. I think the price is workable even if it may appear a little
high to the Atari community. I have met more and more people who are laying
down $2k-$3k for personal systems. Take a look at what it REALLY costs to put
together an 8-bit Atari system (monitor, drive and all) and it starts to look
pretty silly next to an ST. There seems to be a minimal price point of about
$500 to $800 (discounted) to put together a system. Faster chips and memory
do not appear the real base, but things like monitors, drives and keyboards.
Anyway, I'm still looking forward to the TT and feel it has a very viable
chance for success. (I do feel a 25MHZ or better processor will give it a
longer lifespan.)
-Craig W. Daymon
P.S. R.COVERT1, Your comment about an Atari specific bus doesn't hold with
any reports given on the TT. All reports indicate a VME
bus, the standard on Unix microprocessor systems.
(Besides, wasn't the Apple bus specific to the Mac II?)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 80 Tue Jul 04, 1989
TOWNS at 21:11 EDT
Yes, Craig.. The Mac II uses NuBus. Not VME from what I have
heard. As to what the TT will contain, I do not know.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 81 Tue Jul 04, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 20:09 MDT
C.DAYMON,
The MacII uses a MODIFIED NuBus, not a true NuBus. For one thing, the Mac II
NuBus isn't as fast as a real nubus. The Atari could make a great market for
itself if it has a FAST (30 megahertz) bus to do fast video graphics. As for
the bus in the TT, even John Townsend keeps repeating that the TT 's buss was
never announced. So, who knows if it will be a real VME buss (a great thing if
true) or some bastardized kludge of a buss (aka the Mega ST buss). I would
LOVE to buy a TT, simply for the better graphics, but knowing how slow Atari
is to provide support (still waiting for a working flow control version of TOS
1.4), I don't have a lot of faith in Atari much these days. Hopefully, Atari
will prove me wrong and the TT will be wonderful!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 82 Wed Jul 05, 1989
P.MCCULLOUGH at 00:42 EDT
Actually the MAC IIx machines (x here standing for any number of models in
this distended family-) are very nice if one has no problem spending
truckloads of greenbacks. But if I had those bucks, I'd buy a Sun anything
over the Scottish fruit any day. The Sun systems are going to do serious
damage to the high end Mac II family. The TT really has no competition
(Especially since it doesn't exist as yet in anything other then prototype
model-) in its price/market. It'll probably go head to head with Commodore
(Assuming Commodore can keep alive after its massive stock dives and sales
losses of late- wonder what's going on over there anyway). The other problem
with the Mac systems in general are Apple's marketing them as "serious"
competition to IBM. Please, get real. The only problem is that if the
speculation is correct on the TT price tag (And there's no reason to assume it
is) I think the TT will be a difficult sale. Atari needs computer sales in
some really BIG business market with BIG visibility
if it hopes to sell TTs there. It would be nice if Atari tried donating STs
to schools- when students learn on a system, they stick with it. But the fact
remains that business has always been, and probably will continue to be Big
Blue domain. PVM
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 83 Wed Jul 05, 1989
GORDON at 14:38 EDT
I think the TT will be VERY aggressivly priced. The question is will UNIX
people buy a low priced machine that does not have the hand holding and
support they are used to????
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 84 Wed Jul 05, 1989
C.DAYMON at 22:42 EDT
I think there are a GREAT number of Unix people that are waiting for a low
(moderately) priced Unix machine and I don't (although I hope it's there)
think lack of support will stop them. As the ST market is filled with people
ready and willing to tear open their machines to try some tempting mod, so
there are a great many Unix people using accelorated AT class machines. I
know one guy that has 3 such systems running in his house. They are also
people that after getting a TT (Unix) box at home would be very apt to push it
into the work environment. (In which most of them are using/administrating
Unix systems.) There is a big market for such a machine, the key is that
Atari should NOT ignore the very large market associated with support for Unix
machines sold to businesses/universities. After all, they would just charge
for answering questions (after some initial free support period) and this
would keep them up on things in-house to better support and enhance future
products.
I think the VME bus was mentioned in the Atari Explorer issue that talked
about the TT. This, even though it hasn't always been, should be one
publication that accurately reports information on Atari products. It's easy
enough to check.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 85 Thu Jul 06, 1989
HS [Holly] at 00:58 EDT
Gordon,
If dealers are selling the TT, a company might well get the kind of hand-
holding they're used to. It will depend on the dealer.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 86 Wed Jul 05, 1989
G.E.M. at 22:11 PDT
Regarding the bus structure. If Atari really wants to make a mark, the TT
should support not only the VME bus, but Future bus as well.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 87 Thu Jul 06, 1989
WHITESTR at 07:15 PDT
Gordon, when you mention expected handholding (bet you some guys
would get a bit peeved at that comment, true or not) are you refering
to end-user or developer? I'm thinking that if Atari slaps on a GUI
(X.desktop possibly??) and works on porting some popular apps so that
they are compatible, handholding becomes no more a need, neccessarily,
than on the ST. For developers, well, that's another story.
Le'on
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 88 Thu Jul 06, 1989
GORDON at 14:56 EDT
Actually what I was refering to was the simple fact that you do not go to the
local store and purchase a Sun workstation. A TRAINED salesman from SUN
visits you, sells you the computer and makes sure you know how to use it. He
also makes sure things like what happened on here recently do not happen (a
computer was lost in repair for 6 months). Its just a different approach. I
think everyone here will admit that Atari is not at the top of the list for
prompt efficient customer service.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 89 Thu Jul 06, 1989
QMI at 16:39 EDT
Gordon,
SUN's *ARE* being sold through computer stores now... thru the CompterLand
chain. It takes a special type of dealer, though, and just about all of the
Atari dealers (that are left) would not have the resources to handle the
support needed for a UN*X machine. With the lower prices on the Sun ws's, they
aren't making those individual sales visits like they used to do. With this
new low end approach, it will make it harder for anyone to compete with Sun.
Le'onm
I agree that a graphical user interface is a MUST for the un*x side of the
TT... or any lower-priced workstation. I hope Atari is talking with a company
who will license a well-known working environment to be included with the base
computer.
From everything I have heard, it looks like the TT will be priced very
closely to an equivalent Sun machine. Sounds like a critical problem and worth
at least a few 'choas-theory-styled' board meetings!
JD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 90 Thu Jul 06, 1989
BREHBOCK at 22:13 CDT
There are a lot of aggressive VARS out there that are doing quite well with
the Everex Step (TM) series, and the TT would fit in that niche rather well.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 91 Thu Jul 06, 1989
M.MCCANN2 at 23:44 EDT
I think I must disagree with the contention that Atari is bad at customer
service. Recently my color monitor died and I sent it from here (east coast)
to there and it was back in exactly 3 weeks. I was, to be frank, shocked. I
was told to expect 6-8 weeks, which I was truly expecting (as in, 6 at best).
Three was simply outstanding. Of course, being able to take it in for repair
locally would be faster still, BUT as that will probably not be possible till
the 1 millionth or so ST is sold in the US (IF THEN, around HERE), this WAS a
quick and reasonable alternative... By the way, it was a Goldstar, and the
flyback was melted, after 2 years' use. These things happen...too bad I can't
get a Goldstar flyback or I'd still have it.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 92 Thu Jul 06, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 22:07 MDT
Of course this is all pure speculation, as Atari has never even admitted
publicly that the TT exists, or when it will ship. Just ask John Townsend.
John keeps repeating that nothing can be said about the TT until it is
released. So, who really knows what it will be like. To back this up, think
back about 3 years, and remember what features the Blitter chip was supposed
to have. And look at the Blitter that was released. IT Only has about half the
features that Atari said it was supposed to have. So, I don't believe anything
about the TT until it is released. Until then, Atari can change from the VME
buss to one of their own design if they so choose.
This is not to say that I don't want one, because I do!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 93 Fri Jul 07, 1989
GRIBNIF at 23:23 EDT
What I think Atari needs to do, in addition to the TT with all of its
features and ports and doo-dahs is release a lower end 68030 like Apple
has done with the SE 68030.
This would be a Mega 4 with a 68030 and the higher resolutions of the TT.
Correctly priced to fit between the TT and the Mega 4. Of course, I doubt
Atari would do this.
I would also recommend the release of a Mega 1 to dealers for $1,199-mono
and $1,399 color and adding it to the Mega dealer line.
Then take the 1040ST and release it mass-market. (Discontinue the 520ST
or release it mass-market too).
This would allow a 1Meg machine to go mass market and get better sales and
such, while allowing dealers to still carry a 1 Meg low priced machine
that only they have.
I also think they should take the Moniterm and their present $4,000
Mega 4 DP package, bundle it with Calamus and release a Moniterm DP
Package for $5,999.95.
Pity I don't work for Atari...
Rick
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 94 Sat Jul 08, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 14:58 MDT
As far as Apple having better costumer support than Atari, well they have more
resources, but I have heard many people complain about the costomer service
that Apple has. I have also heard many complain (I am one who does) about
the buggyness and the amount of systems they keep releasing. I have run
systems that over a period of time become unstable and use more and more ram,
and no one can explain it. I have worked with many different Macs, and if
you told a service person about the errors I have gotten, he would say that's
impossable. At least the STs errors are predicatable! And I have talked to
Apple users who say for over a year that Apple has been promising a laptop
mac, well where is it? Now as far as releasing the STs for mass marketing, do
you mean sell them at Sears, I hope not. If Atari sells computers at Sears,
noone will even take the ATW seriously! I mean that Atari can sell 8-bits at
Sears with only minor damage to their name, but when they sell 16-bit
computers through Sears, noone will take their 16-bit computers seriously.
Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 95 Sat Jul 08, 1989
DMAY [Student] at 18:46 EDT
The summer is a rather slow for customer returns since most of the problems
arise during the XMAS season from all those video game systems.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 96 Mon Jul 10, 1989
WLR at 01:29 PDT
Basically, I think Atari's TT will fail in the marketplace because as
computers get more expensive and buyers get more vertically based with the
third party software and hardware availibilty and support being as important
or more important than the computer itself a high-end computer from Atari who
has been established as neither here nor there to third party
manufactors/companies.
Atari's customers have been, in the past, willing to wait for software to meet
their needs to come onto the marketplace. People that buy computers that cost
4K plus know exactly what software to buy and will NOT wait for dreamy
promises from anyone like many early Mac/ST & Amiga users did.
I mean would you buy a TT for a certain application, pay the big bucks and sit
and wait for a third party to develop it. Some might say well the machine is
backward compatable-- if that is true then the buyer would buy the cheaper
machine nor the TT.
Worse, Atari no longer has a upgradeable loyal user base. Atari also cannot
play the "Power without the Price" game. Reason: Unlike the ST verses the old
Mac where the ST was twice the machine for half the price the TT will be about
the same machine for about 2/3 the price when in the marketplace to WOW! a
buyer it would NOW have to be four times the machine at half the price. THAT
is why the TT will do a piddle of business in the U.S.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 97 Mon Jul 10, 1989
GORDON at 13:52 EDT
QMI.
John where did you hear that the TT was going to be the same price as a SUN.
I heard it was going to be real cheap!!!
As far as a Graphical User Interface. Atari has GEM and GDOS!!
(sound of Gordon ducking)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 98 Mon Jul 10, 1989
C.DAYMON at 23:18 EDT
There is also a version of GEM that runs under Unix (via X-Windows) and since
the TT will run Unix, there should be plenty of powerful software very fast.
Over 20 years of Unix must mean there is some good stuff out there that will
show up almost immediately for the TT. Besides, there are a great many very
good ST programs that will surely shine running on the TT. (Any DTP program,
DynaCAD, LDW Power, Touch-Up,...) This machine DOES have a market RIGHT NOW!
The ATW also has a market, but may be slightly slower to develope because of
the limited number of programmers experienced with parallel computing.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 99 Tue Jul 11, 1989
LEN-F at 01:28 EDT
I can't imagine that the TT or the ATW (come on, let's get some catchy,
palatable names for these machines!!!!!!) will succeed in the marketplace
given the ATROCIOUS way Atari treats dealers and their REDICULOUS AVERSION to
advertising. It is a shame that the fate of these fine machines is in the
hands of such seemingly incompetent businesspeople!
LEN F
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 100 Tue Jul 11, 1989
PSINC [Mark S.] at 11:42 EDT
Gordon, I think John was refering to Atari's track record of bringing out a
machine at more than they expected (let alone later than expected).
Two years ago they were saying "under 5000". A lot has happened since then,
and SUn machines are _much_ cheaper now.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 101 Wed Jul 12, 1989
BREHBOCK at 00:52 CDT
Rick, I say we (Atari Owners/Retailers/Developers) all buy up a bunch of Atari
stock, and start kind of an ESOP, but it would be an O-SOP: Owner-Stock-
Ownership-Plan! Ok-ok, you can be CEO :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 102 Sat Jul 15, 1989
R.GRIDLEY [Rick] at 09:22 EDT
A lot of companies, smaller ones, would be inticed by a Unix/TT system that
could use 520ST's as smart terminals in the TT network. Low cost and high
power for said network could be a real plus in selling.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 103 Sat Jul 15, 1989
TOWNS at 15:38 EDT
Point well taken..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 104 Sun Jul 16, 1989
S.NOAH at 01:53 PDT
If the TT is indeed going to support Unix and X-Windows, has anyone given any
thought to creating an X-Windows terminal program for the ST ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 105 Sun Jul 16, 1989
TOWNS at 15:40 EDT
I think one already Exists..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 106 Sun Jul 16, 1989
C.DAYMON at 22:29 EDT
There's probably a few in the Unix public domain.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 107 Tue Jul 18, 1989
K.BAD [S/W Engine] at 21:33 EDT
An X-terminal is not that easy to implement, I seriously doubt that there are
any useable PD ones.
And I think John's right - I believe one X-ists ;-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 108 Tue Jul 18, 1989
G.E.M. at 22:46 PDT
If the TT implements X-Windows, it better use X11. That's the new standard.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 109 Wed Jul 19, 1989
C.DAYMON at 22:18 EDT
I relatively sure that the code for X-Windows is PD via MIT, so I doubt that
Atari would go with anything less than the latest version. (Besides, I think
X11 has been around for a while now.) A better question is whether Atari is
planning support of Motif or Open Look. Seems like Motif is winning and from
the pictures, it looks better. Anybody know functionally which may be
stronger? A machine like the TT may well be able to SET the next standard if
they choose wisely. (Considering the lower planned price than other competing
machines.) Have there been any talks with Pixar about porting RasterMan? (To
the ATW also.)
-Craig W. Daymon
P.S. Latest trade journals report Motif is due to ship very soon. I do
hate the idea that IBM has a claw in it, but it does seem to have
support.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 110 Wed Jul 19, 1989
K.BAD [S/W Engine] at 23:24 EDT
As far as I know, we have not settled on a user interface standard for the
Unix version of TT. It seems more important for us to wait for the dust to
clear among the competing X user interface standards. We do have a "standard"
graphical shell that will be shipped with the thing, though.
ttfn...
(*ken @ atari*)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 111 Wed Jul 19, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 23:49 MDT
oh wow!! Ken you really shouldn't talk about the TT in public!! You *know*
that the TT has never been officially announced!! You are gonna get into
trouble with Sam T if you aint careful!! But, we all here want to know more!!
What is the graphical shell?? Multi-tasking TOS??
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 112 Wed Jul 19, 1989
S.NOAH at 23:07 PDT
If an X-terminal program for the ST X-ists, it might be a nice idea for Atari
to mention it as part of any future "TT" sales literature. If they could sell
STs ( even 520 without drives could be used if the program was on a cartrige )
as remote terminals for the TTs. They could thus offer a total multiuser Unix
system with a graphic interface. Something like this could be a nice package
for a small or medium sized business.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 113 Thu Jul 20, 1989
TOWNS at 03:04 EDT
Hmm, that is a good idea. I will pass it along to the marketing gurus
here at Atari.
And yes, Ken.. what are you trying to do! Get us all in trouble? :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 114 Thu Jul 20, 1989
DOUG.W [ST*SYSOP] at 03:14 EDT
I think the biggest problem with X-Windows would be memory requirements. If I
remember right, X-Windows requires around 2 Megs, without any programs
running. Also, to get any speed out of it, you would probably have to by-pass
TOS entirely (MT-C Shell is just bearable, and it doesn't have any windowing,
and VSH Manager is UNBEARABLY slow).
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 115 Thu Jul 20, 1989
S.NOAH at 23:08 PDT
Hmm... I don't know about the memory requirements for an X-terminal, 2 Megs
sounds like quite a bit though. Since we have a mixed environment at work ( 6
VAXs, an IBM Mainframe, 2 Microvaxs, and a couple of hundred P.C.s ) I get to
see a lot of networking literature. One thing I noticed quite a bit are
schemes to convert older P.C.s ( PC, XT ) for use as X-terminals. It's a good
idea, because of all the uses that these machines could be put to, this one
dosn't require any changes to the motherbaord. ( I must mention that there had
been proposals to upgrade these machines to 386 boards. ) Further, our service
vendor ( DEC ) will not work on machines if they have a non stock system
board. So, this idea gives new life and usefulness to these older machines.
P.S. Sorry that I digressed, I meant to say that If a 640k PC could be set up
as an X-terminal, I don't know why a 1Meg ST would have any problem doing the
same. P.P.S. Now all I have to do is try and convince someone to put DEC-
Windows up on one of the VAXs, even the Micro VAX would do, so that we could
test some of this out. Not likely, we can't even get approval to let the users
test Word Perfect. Were stuck supporting Mass(ive)-11 ( ...ugh ).
Stu
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 116 Fri Jul 21, 1989
DOUG.W [ST*SYSOP] at 04:06 EDT
I would suspect that a 640K X-Terminal could only support a subset of the
complete X-Windows system. The UNIX system I use has 8Megs of RAM, and after
starting the system (without X-Windows running), there is 4.4Megs free. After
starting X-Windows this drops to around 2.7Megs without any processes running.
--Doug
P.S. this is a 25Mhz 68030 machine.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 117 Fri Jul 21, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:44 EDT
8Megs down to 4.4 with just Unix? Sounds like a LOT of programs have been set
to be resident. (not paged) We have had Unix V.3 running on a 2Meg Motorola
system for over a year now with no problems. (Except for a few we inflicted
on ourselves in development.) Do you have a large cache?
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 118 Fri Jul 21, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:16 PDT
To be honest I don't know a lot about the workings of an X-terminal, but one
question does come to mind. When you load X-windows on your Unix system are
you then capable of supporting remote X-terminals on your machine ? This
feature, I would imagine, would take up a lot more of the system's resources
than the "terminal only" set up I had in mind. THe ST would be just a dumb
terminal ( in the same way as I am using mine for to enter this message, just
a more sophisticated one ).
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 119 Sun Jul 23, 1989
DOUG.W [ST*SYSOP] at 00:53 EDT
Good point. Yes, this machine is capable of supporting remote X-Terminals at
the same time.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 120 Sat Jul 22, 1989
S.WHITNEY at 22:11 PDT
About support... How about selling the TT cheap and then hiting a couple of
phone support people and _charging for support. Atari might even make a
profit as well as making their system competitive where support is required!
--Steve
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 121 Sun Jul 23, 1989
C.DAYMON at 16:39 EDT
Wow! An Atari '900' number! 1-900-FIXMYTT. Only $.50 a minute.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 122 Sun Jul 23, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 16:03 MDT
How much networking/multitasking will the TT be able to handle? i thought
that it was just an expensive and high level personal computer-like the Mac
II, and the ATW was the real networking beast. Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 123 Tue Jul 25, 1989
T.ONDERS [Tim Onders] at 19:44 EDT
DOUG:
An X-Windows terminal actually requires very little memory, not the two megs
that you quote. What an X-Windows terminal is, is simply the client end of X
running remotely from the server. The applications, Unix, and all of the
processing are done on a server chine, in this case a TT, and the X terminal
only displays the results. It does not take much processing power, since all
the terminal is doing is displaying graphics. It does, however, require 19.2K
bps connection, or ethernet.
Might I recommend that you read the july issue of Byte magazine? It has some
good information on Unix X interfaces and the Client-Server paradigm used by
X. (I think it was July)
-Tim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 124 Tue Jul 25, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:39 PDT
Thanks for the info on the July BYTE magazine, I guess now I have a reason to
renew our office subscription. About the baud rate or etherlink connect , has
anybody seen any of those parallel to etherlink adapters that are out for the
PC. Do you think that, with the right software, they might work on the ST. (
They are being sold as etherlink adapters for laptop PCs. )
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 125 Thu Jul 27, 1989
DOUG.W [ST*SYSOP] at 06:22 EDT
Hmm, I'll have to look at that BYTE. I guess I'm just used to an X-Windows
system which keeps separate bit-maps for each window and continues to update
them even if they are partially obscured by other windows, or even while they
are being dragged around the screen.
There's also a bunch of processing that must occur on the terminal if you do
it right, such as mouse handling, bit-blitting, high-speed line and text
graphics routines, etc.
Yes, you could do without much of this, but then what's the point?
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 126 Fri Jul 28, 1989
T.ONDERS [Tim Onders] at 20:02 EDT
Don't see why the RS-232 to Ethernet adapters could not be used with an ST,
but I would think the highest allowable throughput would be 19.2K.
Admitedly, an X terminal must do a bunch of graphics computing, but an ST
could handle that, especially without doing the applications processing.
-Tim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 127 Sat Jul 29, 1989
S.NOAH at 01:12 PDT
I found the article on the parallel to ethernet adapter, it was in InfoWeek (
April 17,89 ). The adapter is made by a company called Xircom, but is a
little bit pricey for the ST market ( $695 ). The Network access speed is said
to be 500 kbps on an AT class machine. The adapter comes in three
configurations, one for thin ( BNC ) Ethernet, one for Thick Ethernet ( with
an external tranceiver ), and one for twisted pair connection.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 128 Sat Jul 29, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 13:17 MDT
*********************************************************** I saw in my
current issue of STart, that the next issue (only a few days away) will have
an interview with Sam himself, and he will discuss the Stacy and the TT! Aric
Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 129 Sat Jul 29, 1989
C.DAYMON at 16:09 EDT
Boy! That will be a nice article. Now if the post office will get around to
delivering my August issue of STart, I can waite the month for the September.
(While the Sept. issue sits on the news stands.)
-CWD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 130 Sat Jul 29, 1989
SANDY.W [SysOp] at 17:38 EDT
Not to mention the lead times on articles....
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 131 Sun Jul 30, 1989
M.LOADER1 [Mike Loader] at 09:07 PDT
If Atari is hypothetically choosing between Motif and Open Look for its hypo-
thetical TT, then here's one vote for Open Look.
- Mike -
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 132 Sun Jul 30, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:55 EDT
Atari may very well be able to swing a good deal with AT&T over Open-Look due
to the way things are heading toward Motif. AT&T may be very willing to help
out with a machine that will place their interface in front of more people
than a standard workstation would. Sun might not go for it though.
Particularily if it starts to look like another Mac II to contend with.
-CWD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 133 Sun Jul 30, 1989
GRIBNIF at 23:09 EDT
The Atari Parallel port and a true IBM parallel port are very
different. The Xircom adapter will not work on the ST's more
limited parallel port. (Same reason why many of the PC-Link
adaptors that use the parallel port to link laptops to a desktop
computer wont work with PC-Ditto)
Rick
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 134 Mon Jul 31, 1989
S.NOAH at 00:24 PDT
Oh !
Never mind.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 135 Tue Aug 01, 1989
K.BAD [S/W Engine] at 23:51 EDT
AT&T wants a LOT LOT LOT of money for Open Look.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 136 Wed Aug 02, 1989
C.DAYMON at 19:16 EDT
i thought I saw something in Unix Today! that said they had recently changed
that attitude. Since the majority seems to be favoring Motif, I think they
have had to rethink it. This is a VERY recent change. (Besides, those little
push-pins look interesting.)
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 137 Tue Aug 29, 1989
SLP at 07:55 EDT
In the latest issue of Computer Shopper, I noticed an Ethernet adapter for the
Mac that was a SCSI device. It could be part of a SCSI chain and was $495.
Probably could be used with the ST without much trouble. Now where was that
address:
Compatible Systems Co.
P.O. Drawer 17220
Boulder, CO 80308
(800) 356-0283
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 138 Wed Aug 30, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 23:48 MDT
There has been some talk on comp.sys.atari.st on USENET from Germany about the
new 68030 TT which was announced on the 25th. There are two sides that I have
seen. One is that the TT will be on par with the Mac IIx (the 16MHz Macintosh)
and the other is that because of bad hardware design the TT will be VERY slow
compared to other 68030 machines. It does seem that Atari is using a modified
VME buss, which uses only 24 address bit and only 16 data bits. This has been
confirmed by a guy in Germany who saw a demo TT. Also, the TT will use a
propretiary color monitor,so your NEC Multisync monitor won't run on the TT.
The release date was NOT announced, though it is expected that the TT will be
available by Christmas in Germany. No news of the TT in the States though.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 139 Thu Aug 31, 1989
DANSCOTT at 18:10 EDT
<SIGH>
No comment.....
<GRIN>
Dan/Atari Corp.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 140 Thu Aug 31, 1989
S.NOAH at 21:47 PDT
When can we expect to see an official Atari press release on the TT & STe ?
There are quite a few discrepancies in the various descriptions I've read,
this is especialy true of the STe.
One question that continues to bother me is .. Are the new graphics modes on
the STe and the TT the same ? I've read to many conflicting reports to be
sure of anything. Even the conference from last night didn't resolve all of
the discrepant reports. Please, could somebody at Atari post the Specs on
these machines before the rumours become more widespread than the reality.
Thanks,
Stu
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 141 Fri Sep 01, 1989
TOWNS at 01:10 EDT
I am not sure when I can get a press release online. As for your question
on video modes. Yes, they are the same. the STE modes are a subset of the
available TT modes.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 142 Fri Sep 01, 1989
K.BAD at 02:12 EDT
What John said about press releases. Until then, I've been given leave to
talk about TT "a bit" (whatever that means ;-) so I'll do my best to quell any
misinformation without getting myself in trouble with my boss (Leonard has a
tendency to get, um, upset sometimes ;-).
All the discussion in the world on Usenet is not going to mean a whole lot
until the people involved have actually _used_ TT's and have read the hardware
specs. The TT's hardware design is not going to make it slow WRT other 68030
machines - in fact there are some features of the TT which will make it much
faster than an "ST with a 68030." Even so, as far as compatibility is
concerned, the TT _is_ an "ST with a 68030," and a lot more enhancements. If
you're interested, I might be able to provide a few more specifics on the
hardware speed issues; for now, let's just say that some of the postings on
the nets have ranged from slightly erroneous to outright absurd.
The VME bus on the TT is not "modified" in any way - it is a standard
"Eurocard" format. Using the smaller cards in the first version of TT (the
one shown in Dusseldorf, called
"TT030/2" for now) has a big advantage in terms of cost reduction. We could
have wangled the "full sized" VME cards into a TT case, but it would have made
it considerably bigger, with considerably more complex hardware, and MUCH more
expen$ive. Atari delivers Power without the Price, remember?!
TT does not use a proprietary color monitor - any standard monitor capable
of displaying VGA graphics will be usable, with the proper adjustments for
screen aspect ratio. Currently in Sunnyvale, I have seen five or six
different kinds of monitors hooked up to TT's, including NEC MultiSync
monitors.
One other unfortunate bit of misinformation was put out at the Dusseldorf
show, and that is relative TT speed. In the original press release we sent to
Germany to be translated for the flyers handed out at the show, we stated that
the features of TT make for four times the memory bandwidth of the ST. That
means, _raw memory access_ in "dual purpose" RAM (that shared by video and
processor) is four times the speed of ST. HOWEVER, there is also an option
for "fast" nibble-mode RAM which is _not_ shared by video, and other hardware
factors make actual program execution speed as much as TEN TIMES as fast as on
ST.
Your mileage may vary.
ttfn...
(*ken @ atari*)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 143 Tue Aug 29, 1989
M.VEDERMAN2 (Forwarded)
More text from USEnet. Please remember, I am posting this as I captured it
from USEnet. I have not seen the TT, nor do I have any opinions regarding
the TT (although it does sound nice, I doubt it'll make it to the US market!)
OK, OK, so I do have some opinions! This retort to the previous posting
sounds pretty good. I especially like that it is TOS/GEM compatible!!
kBAD:
USEnet *is* good, in that we lowly peons in the United States (who apparently
get neglected by Atari Corp.) can at least find out how Atari treats the
'preferred' crowd overseas!!!
----------- BEGIN USEnet posting from SOMEONE ELSE ----------------------
Article 18025 (3 more) in comp.sys.atari.st:
From: atoenne@laura.UUCP (Andreas Toenne)
Subject: Re: Duesseldorf: personal impression of the TT(T)
Message-ID: <1572@laura.UUCP>
Date: 26 Aug 89 18:57:08 GMT
References: <8908251936.AA19454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: atoenne@laura.UUCP (Andreas Toenne)
Organization: Universitaet Dortmund
Lines: 92
OK,
don't believe everything you see or hear :-) :-0
I've been demoing the TT today and (prob.) tomorrow with Smalltalk80.
So please let me correct some mistakes and official :-) romours.
In article <8908251936.AA19454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> V61@DHDURZ1.BITNET
(Ronald L
amprecht) writes:
>-68030, 16MHz
>- VME slot (A24,D16)
>shared RAM for video and processor with an access time of 250ns
>- tiny ugly box with the old ST keyboard with it's famous function keys
>Price: appr. DM 5700 -- including 30MB Harddisk and color monitor
>(They said it wouldn't be sold without the Harddisk or the color monitor --
> no chance for a cheap upgrade)
Wrong.
What you saw was the 'complete' low-cost version.
Certainly there will be packages without harddrive. However the monitor
is somewhat special (close to VGA but not close enough) so good ones
like NEC multisync will work but result in a bad picture with thick
borders around.
It RUNS the old ST harddisks so you can get it cheaper than 6500DM incl.VAT
None at Atari is willing to give final statements about that though.
Leonard Tramiel said to me: 'Germain sales will determine the packages
(in Germany)'. So I'll stay optimistic.
>Seeing this I called it a TTT --- namely a Tic Tac Toe machine: You will
never
>loose something with respect to the old ST, but you have no chance to win
>a jackpot with it.
Ouch, Amiga owner?
>Actually I would call it a wastage of highly sophisticated microprocessors
>the way an 68030 is slowed down to 2MHz Busfrequency. A (A24,D16) VME slot
>that would have been something useful for the ST, but an 68030 should be
>worth an full 32bit VME slot ! A speedupfactor of 4 that's a shame and I'm
>quite sure the TT will be the slowest 68030 machine that will ever exist.
>I wouldn't call the TTT a workstation -- and I won't buy it.
Tstststs, turn your mind on before you talk!
1. The processor runs at 2MHz with VME bus only but at full 16Mhz else.
2. The speed factor is 3times(my minimal guess) < 4times < 5times (Leonard).
So do some calculations.... Smalltalk80 for instance runs at 40% Dorado on
the ST. It runs at 116% Dorado on the MacII (CX) with the same software!
So if the TT is 4 times faster than the ST it will run at 160% Dorado and
thats a bringer. I estimate this machine as equivalent to the Max II (CX).
3. The TT uses this so called 'Slow Ram' for the lower 2meg only. The real
memory expansion (who uses a workstation with 2meg anyway?) takes place
at 16meg++ addresses and is called "Fast Ram". This uses full and
sophisticated
caching with 4*64bit burst filling.
The application can decide (loader flag) where the binaries should lie and
where Malloc() calls should take place.
So my impressions (I AM NOT PAID BY ATARI, BUT I LIKE TO TAKE ONE :-)
It has a *UGLY* design (at least).
It is as fast as a MacII (at least)
It is *VERY* TOS compatible. Well, I'd say the Software is not TOS
compatible.
Calamus for instance runs and about 90% of professional software too.
Expect problems with alot of games.
It has nice color graphics (forgot howmany, but *ALOT*) and a nice high
resolution monochrome mode (16??@6??).
It is the cheapest workstation of that power around (about 1/2 the price
of comparable competitors here in Germany).
Besides:
- the drive will be 1.44 meg although they show 720 right now
- the keyboard will be better. It's just a mega keyboard on the fair.
- the monitors will be better. They took VGA monitors for the fair.
It will be in the shops sometimes between Christmas and early spring.
Nobody dared to name an exact date though :-)
If you'll find to take a ride to Duesseldorf you'll enjoy the fair.
There are alot of nice presentations.
Andreas Toenne
atoenne@unido.uucp
Disclaimer: I speak for myself only and not for Atari or my boss.
I may have misunderstood some things and perhaps some of the 'facts' are
wrong or will change. But the machine is real and not bad either.
------------- END USEnet POSTING ---------------------
Sounds good? Will this ever see it to market in the US? If it sees its way
to the US market will it die from lack of ATARI Corp. support?
Will anyone in the US be able to make a living supporting the TT?????
- mike vederman
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 144 Wed Aug 30, 1989
WBLAIR (Forwarded)
Mike,
Many thanks for that USEnet post. Great to here something positive about TT
for a change. Now if I could just get more info on the STE. Guess I'll have
to get in on the conference with SamTramiel tonight.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 145 Thu Aug 31, 1989
RHELZ (Forwarded)
I missed the conference with Sam Tramiel...busy with school. Is it now
availible for downloading? Could someone give me a file number? Thank you
kindly in advance.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 146 Thu Aug 31, 1989
HS (Forwarded)
I think there's both a non-ARCd and an ARCd version. If I remember right,
one was 11996 and the other was 11997. Perhaps one of the STOps could post
the numbers on the door... (I think that Jeff mentioned the numbers in Cat
14.)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 147 Fri Sep 01, 1989
DAVESMALL (Forwarded)
Dot -- thanks for doing the translation -- and apologies for the all the typos
I'm sure you corrected for me.
(I can just see the original translation of what I typed in before correction,
given the usual 1 typo per line rate I manage... "Introducing the Atari TT
Selective Fire Assault Weapon".
Oh, well. )
-- thanks, Dave / Gadgets
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 148 Fri Sep 01, 1989
JEFF.W (Forwarded)
Holly pegged the file numbers for the transcripts exactly:
Un-ARC'ed: File #11996
ARC'ed: File #11997
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 149 Fri Sep 01, 1989
M.VEDERMAN2 (Forwarded)
Here is some more text from USEnet, this time straight from a reliable
source, Allan Pratt! This is a LONG one!
--------------- BEGIN ALLAN PRATT'S USEnet POST---------------
Article 18181 (21 more) in comp.sys.atari.st:
From: apratt@atari.UUCP (Allan Pratt)
Subject: Re: Duesseldorf: personal impression of the TT(T)
Message-ID: <1670@atari.UUCP>
Date: 31 Aug 89 01:19:58 GMT
References: <8908251936.AA19454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <1572@laura.UUCP>
<123947@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Organization: Atari Corp., Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 97
cmcmanis%pepper@Sun.COM (Chuck McManis) writes:
>Hmmm, the whole graphics capability question is really foggy so far.
Here's some really straight scoop about the TT from inside Atari:
The video palette has *4* bits per gun for color values. That is, you
have a total of 4096 colors: 16 levels each of red, green, and blue.
(The ST has a palette of 512 colors: 8 levels for each gun.) Another
"color" mode provides 256 levels of grey (actually green), for really
fine reproduction of a black-and-white image. This is independent of
the resolution: if you're in a 16-color mode, you can pick any 16
levels from the spectrum of 256. (We call this hyper-monochrome:
one color, but a lot of it!)
There are *6* video modes: the three ST modes (totally compatible),
plus 640x480 16-color, plus 320x480 *256* color, plus 1280x960
monochrome. ALL of these modes except the last can be shown on a
single monitor. That monitor need not be multisync. It can be a
slightly modified VGA monitor, or (of course) the monitor which Atari
will sell for the TT. The last mode needs a Viking monitor or
something similar.
ST high rez (640 x 400 x 2 colors) is not limited to black and white:
you can choose any two colors.
>Does this mean it has a "DMA" port like the 520/1040/MegaX ? Does it have
>a "real" SCSI port as well? What kind of through put can be expected from
>the hard disk interfaces? Can it do DMA and access > 4Meg ?
Yes, there is a DMA port like on the ST and Mega. Your hard disk will
plug right in. You can connect a bootable SH204 and it will boot!
There is also an external SCSI port. The SCSI port can access the full
32-bit address space; the ACSI port is limited to 24-bit addresses.
The internal hard drive is connected to the SCSI bus.
>Is the
>VME slot the _only_ way to expand it, or does it have a Mega compatible
>expansion connector as well?
There are a number of ways to expand the TT: you can add 2MB of
dual-purpose (video and CPU) RAM, or 10MB when 4Mbit chips are
available. You can add 4MB of REALLY FAST 32-bit nybble-mode RAM (not
video-capable), and there's the VME bus.
The number 2MHz that's been bandied about needs some explanation: The
CPU and memory clock speed is 16MHz. There are four clocks in a bus
cycle. For dual-purpose RAM, around half the bus cycles go to the
video or refresh. Therefore, the CPU gets around two million MEMORY
ACCESSES per second, or 2MHz. There are other architectural details
which make it a little faster than that. And remember, each access
gets you 32 bits, not 16 as on the ST. Also, since the CPU is
allocated half the bus cycles, it isn't ALWAYS postponed by video or
refresh: it might try to access the bus just as its turn comes up, and
not wait at all. Therefore dual-purpose memory accesses run at MORE
THAN 2MHz.
"Fast" RAM does not have video taking up any of the cycles, so you
don't have to wait for that. It takes 4 or 5 clocks (I think) to set
up a fast-RAM access, but "nybble mode" means that the CPU fills its
cache in "burst mode" at one cycle per subsequent access.
The VME logic introduces one wait state, so a VMEbus access takes 5
clocks. (Your mileage may vary: VME cards vary widely in response
time.) But, again, you won't be held off the bus by video. VME in the
TT shown in Germany is A24/D16 (24 bits of addess, 16 bits of data).
>[programs can load in fast RAM or dual-purpose RAM]
By a "loader option" the original poster means "load program off disk"
not "load .o files into a .prg file." This is correct: there are flags
in the PRG header which control the behavior of Pexec and Malloc. Most
program can run in fast RAM -- programs which change the screen base
pointer and some other things can't, though.
>[RAM on the VME bus]
You *can* put memory on the VME bus. The performance penalty is not
bad. TOS will recognize that memory and use it for programs if you set
it up right.
>Does it have a Blitter ?
No need for one. The reason for the Blitter is to remove instruction-
fetch overhead from memory operations, and with the 68030 on-chip
cache, the TT does just fine without it.
>>It is the cheapest workstation of that power around (about 1/2 the price
>>of comparable competitors here in Germany).
You can say that again. Please, people, remember that when you compare
the TT with a Next machine, for instance, you're talking about roughly
4x the price! JT's motto is Power Without the Price, and we think
we're giving you just that.
============================================
Opinions expressed above do not necessarily -- Allan Pratt, Atari Corp.
reflect those of Atari Corp. or anyone else. ...ames!atari!apratt
End of article 18181 (of 18203)--what next? [npq]
------------------ END OF POST --------------------
Sounds good? I like it. Now the only question is:
HOW MUCH WILL IT COST WHEN IT MAKES IT TO THE US?
- mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 150 Fri Sep 01, 1989
SANDY.W (Forwarded)
Looks like Atari is starting to discuss the TT in it's topic in Category 14
Topic 35.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 151 Fri Sep 01, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] (Forwarded)
Mike:
Thank you for the post.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 152 Fri Sep 01, 1989
TOWNS (Forwarded)
Yes, Mike thank you for the post. Darlah can we forward Allan's
message to the TT topic in CAT 14?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 153 Sat Sep 02, 1989
PHOTO.3 at 17:47 EDT
How about to a file in the library? It's a bit long for the BB, don't you
think?
(Wasn't there some talk about what are library files and what are messages?
Seems to me that a Bulletin Board gives the impression that the messages are
like short and sweet notes tacked up on a board...)
Appreciate the info, however, Mike.
--Jerry Finzi
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 154 Sat Sep 02, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 19:48 MDT
TOWNS,
I asked my local dealer if the Moniterm 19" monitor would be compatible with
the TT, and he didn't know. The Moniterm monitor requires a Mega ST board, so
that would indicate that it won't work on the TT. Could you clarify the
situation with regards to the Moniter mon itor??
KEN,
thanks for your excellent notes on the TT. It is nice to have someone from
Atari rebut the rumors floating around about the TT. Good work!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 155 Sat Sep 02, 1989
D.ENGEL at 22:07 EDT
I didn't mind the length of that message. I like long ones! However, I
noticed that everyone has been so concerned with graphics power and cpu power
of the TT, that nobody has questioned the sound of the thing. Is the sound of
the TT going to make Amiga and Apple IIGS owners drool? Is the TT the
birthplace of AMY? Please anyone fill us in on the sound chip in the TT!
Getting back to the recent posts, can anyone explain what 'nybble mode' and
'burst mode' and all of that fast ram techno-jargon means. I consider myself
pretty knowledgeable about microprocessors, but I have never herad oops. never
HEARD of those terms. Are they an Atari specific term, or a 68030 term? Also,
what special features of the 68030 are being utilized in the TT? Can the TT
support virtual memory?
Also, it was mentioned earlier that the EST had a new shifter which had
more hardware capabilities like fine scrolling... please, please, let this
feature be in the TT shifter... I can live without GENLOCK but put fine
scrolling in the TT shifter.
While on the subject of the EST... how does the EST handle existing
software sound calls to the AY-3-8910? Is it still there?
By the way, what are the chances that the only major differences between
my ST and an EST as far as graphics are concerned is a new MMU and a new
shifter? Anyone care to wager? The new sound chip could be taked on anywhere
in the upper RAM addresses, and the new controllers would be read by a new
keyboard processor. How about that for a low cost upgrade? New MMU, Shifter,
keyboard circuitboard, and a sound chip daughterboard!
okay. enough already. I hope this starts some conversation going.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 156 Sat Sep 02, 1989
DOUG.W at 23:12 EDT
The new sound chip is a bit trickier to add. It isn't mapped directly to
memory addresses.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 157 Sun Sep 03, 1989
D.ENGEL at 08:48 EDT
If what you say is true, then it lends credibility to the idea that the EST
is merely an ST with a few add-ons included. If the sound chip isn't memory
mapped, then it must be I/O mapped in some way. I seem to recall there were
unused I/O port bits somewhere in there... if so, it would be even simpler to
add than if it were memory mapped.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 158 Sun Sep 03, 1989
GORDON at 09:47 EDT
Actually I thought the TT looked really nice.. It does not look like a mega in
any way, shape or form.. Try to picture this a flat box the size of a large
cookie sheet about 1 in tall. then they put a mega on the left side and a
disk drive on the left side pored plastic over the top.. there is a deep
indentation betweent the mega and disk drive.. It looks nice. I heard some
people say it was hard to put a monitor on it because of the deep
indentation.. but I did not try it... It did look nice though.. I liked its
looks anyway..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 159 Sun Sep 03, 1989
MRAYMOND at 10:55 CDT
On the other hand, if the two "bumps" are the same height, you could stadlle
the with a monitor and use the hole to stuf your important papers (ie Genie
uploads you will do next, pens, pencils, crayons, etc)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 160 Sun Sep 03, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 11:43 MDT
Will the TT's TOS be multitasking??
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 161 Sun Sep 03, 1989
C.DAYMON at 15:36 EDT
The TT will come with TOS 1.4 which is NOT multitasking. You can, as an
option, buy Unix for (possibly not all configurations) the TT if you want
multitasking.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 162 Sun Sep 03, 1989
D.A.BRUMLEVE at 22:04 CDT
To check out more of Gordon Monnier's opinions on the TT, the Duesseldorf
show, the European Atari market, etc., check out Cat 9, Top 5, Message
66 and Cat 10, Top 3, Message 20 over in the MichTron RT. To get there,
type m490;1
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 163 Mon Sep 04, 1989
DAVESMALL at 00:25 EDT
Dot, thank you for the pointer!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 164 Mon Sep 04, 1989
K.BAD [s/w engine] at 06:17 EDT
Mike: Thanks for forwarding the Usenet posts. However, could you please lose
the headers when you re-post 'em here? Pretty please? (I keep headers turned
OFF when I'm reading netnews - I use brief prompts here on GEnie, I'd rather
not wade through ten lines of header in an embedded message ;-)
And as far as TT documentation is concerned, I have asked my boss if I could
post the _original_ of the flyer that Dave typed in and Dot translated, but I
still get a nebulous "unh" as a reply, and I don't want to get in trouble.
I've taken significant heat for some of my user-friendly posts in the recent
past, so I don't want to overdo it right now. Please also see my message in
the topic Dave recently starteed in this category (cat 14, topic 8, message
2).
TT sound is 8 bit stereo PCM, same as STE. Basically, this is 8 bit
digitized sound, but the sound processor runs independantly of the main
processor, so you can do sound and use the main processor for other things.
Kinda like a "sound coprocessor." Leonard likes the term "Digital Tape
Player," because it can function like that, too. You can't plug DAT's or CD'sC
righ:t into\ your FTT, buLt you Acan plSay digHitized\ sound* easil.y.
* Allan has an affinity for techweenie terminology (so do I, at times! ;-).
"Nybble mode" RAM is not shared with the video but is available directly to
the CPU all the time, so access to it is much faster than the "dual-purpose"
RAM that you're used to in your ST. "Burst mode" is a 68030 cache fill mode,
it gets data off the bus REALLY FAST.
As for specific 68030 support, you'll just have to wait and see what we have
in store for you! The first TOS version that will ship on TT will probably
not multitask - we're shooting for the highest degree of ST compatibility that
we can attain. That's why TT TOS is _like_ Rainbow TOS (it isn't exactly
Rainbow TOS though!). Software that doesn't work on a 68030, though, won't
work under TT TOS.
ttfn...
(*ken @ atari*)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 165 Mon Sep 04, 1989
D.A.BRUMLEVE at 10:38 CDT
Thanks for asking the boss, Ken.
<sigh>
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 166 Mon Sep 04, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 12:57 MDT
Did you all know that even the Mac IIx doesn't support multitasking?? It would
be nice to see Atari beat Apple to the market with a multitasking computer
though.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 167 Mon Sep 04, 1989
NHARRIS [Neil] at 17:19 EDT
I have a Mac II on my desk at work. Running multifinder, it multitasks just
fine. Amazing to see, really -- different programs run in different windows,
with the desktop visible in the background. If I click on a window, that
program becomes the "foreground" one, and its menus appear on the top of the
screen. I can start a download, then switch to other applications.
Background printing is automatic if you want it.
Slick stuff. Not perfect, but nice.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 168 Mon Sep 04, 1989
NEVIN-S at 20:10 EDT
I have to agree. I to see a Multifinder clone on the ST or
TT.
--Nevin
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 169 Mon Sep 04, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 23:10 MDT
I don't want to be negative but....The TT is much slower than the NeXT (16 MHZ
versus 25MHz) and it doesn't come close to Mac II resolution (256 colors from
a palette of 4096 as opposed to 256 colors from 16.8million
and boards are being relesed for the Mac that let you run all 16.8million
colors at once (supposedly)). I for one am dissapointed-it has what I w would
have expected the STE would have and the STE falls far short of what I
expected for itC. Yes: the T\T pricFe/poweLr is vAery goSod andH it is\ a nic*e
look.ing
c*omputer (I am interestead in maybe getting one) but it just can't compete
with the NeXT. Sorry to be so pesimistic-maybe you could convince me
otherwise-I really would like to believe it would kill the NeXT, but my Atari
loyalty is not THAT blind.
Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 170 Tue Sep 05, 1989
DOUG.W at 01:36 EDT
There is already a very nice MultiFinder work-alike on the ST. It's called
JUGGLER. If only programmers would follow the rules, this could be a VERY
VERY useable system.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 171 Tue Sep 05, 1989
TOWNS at 01:52 EDT
I can't understand people.. who mentioned the NeXT machine? I certainly
didn't! Sure.. a 25 MHz 68030 versus a 16 MHz 6803, the 25 MHz is going
to be much faster. Big surprise there.
But you are missing the point. The TT certainly won't cost 10 grand to
buy. It will be MUCH cheaper.
I think the ideal comparision for the TT would probably be an Macintosh
SE/30 or a Macintosh IIcx. But a NeXT machine? It's in a COMPLETELY
different price range than the TT. The NeXT machine is designed for
people who have lots of spare cash, the TT is designed for the masses.
It's designed for people who want the power of a 68030 and UNIX and who
have a LIMITED budget.
-- john
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 172 Tue Sep 05, 1989
PSINC at 12:02 EDT
John, even a Mac IIcx is 8K. Probably would be best to compare it to the Amiga
2500. Thought I would help.;-)
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 173 Tue Sep 05, 1989
NHARRIS [Neil] at 12:14 EDT
Juggler is not the same as multifinder. Juggler is more like the old
Switcher, which is no longer being used.
Right?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 174 Tue Sep 05, 1989
DOUG.W at 12:42 EDT
Neil, I'm specifically referring to Juggler *I*, not II. Juggler I allows for
multiple programs to be loaded simultaneously, and if they are proper GEM
applications, all the windows will be onscreen simultaniously, and you can
change applications by simply clicking on a window that is "owned" by that
application. When you do that, that window comes to the foreground and that
Application's menu bar will become the active one.
Juggler I does dynamic memory allocation, rather than partitioning, so you
don't have to set memory partition sizes.
Also, if the applications call the AES as they should, background processes
*can* continue to run.
This is VERY MUCH like MultiFinder.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 175 Tue Sep 05, 1989
NEVIN-S at 15:07 EDT
It is not like multifinder in that it slows down the system incredibly.
Multifinder does not do this, not nearly as much. That is why Juggler I was so
poorly received. You could have WPerfect and LDW Power up and running, and
each was slower then molasses in January. Even when the not-in-use program was
doing nothing (that is, even if WP was just sitting in the background, NOT
doing a search/replace). Juggler I was so slow he had to come out with Juggler
II or folks would have demanded their money back. If Juggler I had been fast,
it would have been a big hit.
--Nevin
(P.S. I use Juggler II when I need a switcher on the ST).
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 176 Tue Sep 05, 1989
K.BAD [s/w engine] at 17:39 EDT
Mark,
Mac IIcx around 8k? TT will be significantly cheaper than that. I don't
know where people keep getting the idea that TT is gonna be expensive. POWER
WITHOUT THE PRICE.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 177 Tue Sep 05, 1989
C.DAYMON at 20:01 EDT
I strongly agree with John, I'm quite sick of hearing people downing the TT
because it doesn't measure up to the NeXT machine. More like the NeXT doesn't
measure up to the ATW. (For that matter, neither does a Sun workstation.) I
think the TT will do very well going head to head with the Mac II's and Mac
SE/30. I don't know what the TT will cost, but I suspect it may start below
$2500. (I hope, I want to buy one. Hopefully, even lower.) I wish the chip
was faster and there was a 1024x768 color mode, but it still sounds like a
very exciting machine. I think some people should be very carful when
comparing the TT with Mac II stats and remember NOT to specify specs of 3rd
party graphics boards. The TT has a VERY well established STANDARD bus that
will permit the use of a great many existing hadrware add-ons that the
majority of the PC market is just not familiar with because they are usually
on workstations.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 178 Tue Sep 05, 1989
M.VEDERMAN2 at 19:24 CDT
Nevin-s
Actually (from what I know about the Mac) programs have to make a specific
call to get the correct time slicing with MultiFinder, which most of the
old applications don't support.
Juggler II came out because Juggler I was not very compatible, *not*
because it was slow (Tim and I have discussed Juggler at length). It is
really a fine program that may get some resurrection on the TT (if I can
talk Tim into doing an update on it).
So what will the TT price be around in the US anyway? The reports from
Germany indicated $5700 DM, and if I can remember the currency exchange
from the last time we got deutsch mark donations, I think they are about
53 cents to the dollar. which would translate to 3K, but of course this
is before the FCC costs get tacked on, and of course other 'American'
price increase tariffs, etc.
- mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 179 Tue Sep 05, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 19:09 MDT
Does the Mac IIx have memory management?? Because if it doesn't then how can
it have real multitasking?? W/O a MMU you run the risk of any singlle task
crashing the whole system. But, a multitasking TT, with multiple windows
running TOS and capable of exchanging data between them would be great!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 180 Tue Sep 05, 1989
R.COVERT1 at 19:11 MDT
Does anyone know if the Moniterm 19" monitor will work on the TT?? It would be
nice if someone who spent $2,000 on it for the Mega ST4 could use the Moniterm
on the TT. Wouldn't be a waste of bucks then.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 181 Tue Sep 05, 1989
GORDON at 21:57 EDT
The dm to the $$ is 1.9 to 1 that makes a 5700DM computer around $2900.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 182 Tue Sep 05, 1989
GORDON at 21:59 EDT
The biggest reason for Juggler II was the fact that most programs did not use
GEM properly. And, for that reason would not run under Juggler I. These are
the same programs that will not run on the TT or the STE in MAX resolution. -
s
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 183 Tue Sep 05, 1989
NEVIN-S at 23:16 EDT
I guess everyone has their own opinion. I did a thorough review of Juggler I
and even with programs that worked, I found the speed decrease unbearable.
That is just my opinion of course...
--Nevin
Now back to the TT topic...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 184 Wed Sep 06, 1989
D.ANDERSON22 [FastTech Rep] at 00:18 EDT
Actually, Gordon, at 1.9 to 1, a 5700dm machine comes out to EXACTLY $3000.
-Dave
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 185 Wed Sep 06, 1989
SYNERGIST at 00:27 EDT
Amazing! All this fuzz and bother over what is still a vapor machine:-)
Wait until it hits your dealer shelves. Then get upset over what you
on't like. You could be giving yourself fits over a machine
Atari never delivers to the U.S.A. . .
<<Jim>>
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 186 Wed Sep 06, 1989
J.H.CARROLL at 01:51 EDT
Yup, I'm one for waiting until the TT debuts before questioning its power
and price. If Atari the TT ships with all that's promised (including a
version that runs UNIX - seems someone mentioned that the UNIX version would
ship 6 months after the basic one would) then I can't see the problem with a
68030 machine with a price tag of $3000. I mean come on guys, if you WANT
multifinder and the 16.8 million colours, then run out and buy a MAC IIx.
Does anyone believe for a minute that ATARI is making industry-record margins
on its hardware?
Jon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 187 Wed Sep 06, 1989
ICDINC at 10:39 EDT
Nevin,
Don't forget that the Germans pay a 14% National Sales Tax and that
is usually included in the "quoted" retail price. (But not always)
- TOM -
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 188 Wed Sep 06, 1989
GORDON at 14:58 EDT
I have posted an article that was in a English newspaper in the MichTron RT.
The columnist was in Germany for the official introduction of the STE and TT
and makes some very interesting comments about them and Atari.
Its file #1413 in the MichTron RT.. Page 490
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 189 Wed Sep 06, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:53 PDT
I know that this is several months off, but I just got my guide in the mail
yesterday. Will the TT be at Comdex thais November ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 190 Wed Sep 06, 1989
CYCLONE at 23:06 CDT
When uploading text from Usenet or other sources, you may want to be aware
that if you separate it from your message text with a line of dashes GSCAN
will not show the rest of the message (it thinks the next message has begun).
Therefore, perhaps a new delimiter would be in order - may I suggest a line of
pound signs? "################"
- Bill
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 191 Wed Sep 06, 1989
S.NOAH at 21:55 PDT
Gordon,
the article in the MichTron RT was very interesting, but from what the Atari
people around here have been saying the section covering the STe isn't totaly
accurate. The article states that the STe will be able to show 512 colors from
a palette of 4,096, while the Atari spokespeople here have made it pretty
clear that the video modes only have a larger palette, not more displayable
colors.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 192 Thu Sep 07, 1989
TOWNS at 01:13 EDT
Maybe they are talking about the use of Spectrum 512. Which by the way,
still works on STE just fine.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 193 Thu Sep 07, 1989
PSINC [M. Sloatman] at 11:46 EDT
Maybe, but that's pretty misleading unless they mention the use of Spectrum
512.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 194 Thu Sep 07, 1989
ISD at 23:27 EDT
Ahmmmm...s'cuse me! ... thanks... :-)
Today I saw the brochure that Atari Gmbh handed out at the Dusseldorf fair
about the TT.
Please tell me that the very ugly machine on the front *isn't* what the TT
030/2 will look like...please... !!!!
Julius O. @ Large @ ISD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 195 Thu Sep 07, 1989
V.ALBINO at 21:00 PDT
I am a big supporter of Atari. I love my ST. I have been waiting, like many
others, for the debut of the new TT machine. Also, like many others, I have a
lot of questions about what the new machine will or will not have. However,
all of these questions pale in comparison to one, overriding question that I
wish someone would answer. Why did Atari introduce TWO new machine with many
of the same features at the same time? The 68030 TT is a logical upgrade with
more speed, power, resolution, etc. It would have been easy for people to
move to that machine from the ST. But with two machines, there is, in my
opinion, inadequate differentiation in the proposed market. Some people will
go to the STE, which I believe is a waste of Atari's resouces, while others go
to the TT. What is a software developer supposed to write for, the STE, or
the TT? Both? Have we divided and conquered ourselves? If developers aim
for the lowest common denominator, i.e. the program that will run on the most
machines, that means that the STE will have software that will not take
advantage of the additional power of the TT. Will someone please try to make
some sense of this situation for me. It appears that the marketing stategy
here evades my understanding. Thanks.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 196 Fri Sep 08, 1989
TOWNS at 02:51 EDT
The TT is downward compatible with ST and STE computers. Any software
that is written correctly for ST should work on the TT. As for the STE,
please keep in mind that the STE will replace the ST in Atari's line
of computer products.
I personally don't think that we are splitting the market. The machines
are aimed at two distinctly different markets.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 197 Fri Sep 08, 1989
ICDINC at 07:23 EDT
Julius,
That is what they were showing at Dusseldorf. I think Sam and
Leonard probably did get the message from the Germans that it was ugly. In my
own private survey... about 100 said ugly... 1 said nice. The 1 was Gordon
from Michtron.
Hopefully Atari had not started tooling for it. (The cases were
prototype variety foam molded.) If it does come out in that case, maybe we
will have to sell an 'upgrade' case for the TT. ;-)
- TOM -
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 198 Fri Sep 08, 1989
PSINC [M. Sloatman] at 11:56 EDT
So, Gordon was the only one, eh<grin>.
John, do you have any idea on how long before Atari stops manufacture on the
1040/Mega line? How long before the STE takes their place?
Thanks,
Mark P.S. - Any answer yet on the STE developer info?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 199 Fri Sep 08, 1989
GORDON at 14:01 EDT
Towns in reference to your message 196 are you saying that if a game is
written for the ST it will run on the TT but if it is written for the STE it
will not run on the TT?
In other words the STE is not compatible with the TT and ST in the higher
graphic modes. (naturally its not with the ST for get that)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 200 Fri Sep 08, 1989
D.MCNAMEE [Dan2@Atari] at 14:17 EDT
Julius,
What's wrong with it?? I think it looks neat!
Dan
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 201 Fri Sep 08, 1989
TOWNS at 17:07 EDT
Gordon,
Let me spell this out, to avoid the confusion...
The TT is downward compatible with the STE, ST, and MEGA computers.
Any software that is written for machines listed above will work on
the TT. Assuming that it is written properly and designed with the
68030 in mind.
The STE is downward compatible with the ST and MEGA computers. Any
software that is written for machines listed above will work on
the STE (this means the ST and MEGA machines).
...As for the case, well.. I think its interesting. I have heard a
number of comments from people who didn't like it or weren't impressed.
I think Tom is right.. I think Sam and Leonard got that message as well.
As for STE production vs. MEGA production.. I don't know. I don't have
anything to do with the manufacturing side of the business.
STE Developers Documentation: Making progress.. give me alittle bit more
time.
-- John
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 202 Fri Sep 08, 1989
ISD at 19:40 EDT
What's wrong with it?
Well, it ain't pretty thats for sure. It looks like someone slapped a Mega
and small SH204 on plastic base and decided to call it a TT.
One of the things the TT will need to enjoy success is appearance. What I saw
did not look very professional or business like - it looked more like a toy
computer instead of a 32 bit 16 Mhz near-workstation class machine that it is.
Have a gander at the Sun SPARCstation, or the newer COMPAQ styling (now
*those* looks sharp!). It needs to look sexy, sharp, and "I mean business!".
Just the opinion of a humble programmer... :-)
Julius O. @ Large @ ISD
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 203 Fri Sep 08, 1989
M.MCCANN2 at 20:06 EDT
I have a question regarding TT and/or the STE - it was stated somewhere that
the reason the STE has built in Genlock is a new Shifter chip (if I recall
right). And that also gives the 4096 colors. Any way to retrofit that chip,
or any of those other upgrades, to older STs? After all, latest 520/1040s can
accept a Blitter chip while earlier ones would not w/o hacking the hardware.
I am curious as to what is the hardware that permits this "hardware assisted
fine scrolling" (is this the blitter?? or what?) and the 8 bit PCM audio
(Amy??? [Nah]). Thanx for ANY info... [Or, in German, "Wie gehts???"]
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 204 Fri Sep 08, 1989
D.ENGEL at 20:20 EDT
I left a message asking about the sound a few days ago. I also stated
possible upgrade routes for ST/Mega owners. However, "Hardware Assisted fine
scrolling" can only mean that the new shifter allows for the screen address to
reside on any word boundary, and that provisions have been made for pixel
offsets to be made. Combine these two features, and viola: fine scrolling!
(This is only a guess, but it's as much as ANY programmer could hope for)
How are the TT/030 developer docs coming????????
Also, what exactly is the definition of 'Genlock' in the EST? Is it like
the 'stereo capable' TVs and VCRs of a few years back which advertised 'Stereo
Capable' but neglected to mention you had to buy a separate decoder to use
this 'feature'. When you say 'genlock' I want to be able to plug my VCR in one
jack and my Monitor into another, and play the vcr to the monitor with
computer graphics simultaneously. Any extra hardware needed would be
misleading....
Fianlly, can the TT do the same 'Genlock'???
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 205 Fri Sep 08, 1989
DOUG.W at 23:11 EDT
The STE does *NOT* have a GENlock built-in. It was designed so that a low-
cost GENlock could be added EXTERNALLY, with NO internal modifications.
Your assumptions about scrolling are correct.
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 206 Sat Sep 09, 1989
C.DAYMON at 00:32 EDT
Personally, I've seen PLENTY of Sun workstations and I think the keyboard
makes a Mega keyboard look EXTREMELY sexy. It may be functionally better, but
it looks like it was cut from a block of stone! Not very stylish at all! I
don't think the Sparc station looks all so great either. Basically like a
Mega with a bunch of blemishes.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 207 Sat Sep 09, 1989
DAVESMALL at 01:03 EDT
The Mac machines with 68030 have an MMU -- inside the 030. The 020 machines
can be fitted with an MMU; it's a prerequisite to installing A/UX. As for true
multitasking without MMU, while it isn't Completely Perfect, heck, the Amiga
seems to do pretty well. (Please, no religious wars..)
I think the mix of UNIX and ST is going to be extremely interesting.
Unleashing the power of the UNIX toolkit on ST developers should give them
access to a world of tools they've never had, which integrate well, which will
greatly speed development and debugging of ST applications. I've not seen
anyone mention this yet, but it may one key selling point to the TT / Unix --
a sort of ultimate (for now) ST development engine.
And mind you, I'm far from being called a UNIX devotee. But the shards of UNIX
that have made it to the ST have usually been pretty popular. And do I ever
need 16 mhz, preferably of no wait state ram, during assemblies.
My opinion? I hope and wish Atari will bring a TT or TTWO to the WAACE show
next month and "debut" them just for ST owners here. It would not be a major
logistical problem -- like, two suitcases? -- can precede Calmdex without
causing problems, and would give American owners a feeling of encouragement.
Cheap when the price is the loan of two machines over one weekend.
Tell you what, Atari ... I'm under nondisclosure and all that. I'll offer to
personally pick up the costs of hand-carrying a TT from your offices, to the
WAACE show, watch it like a hawk there, and get it back to you -- *no cost to
you whatsoever* -- if you'll just hand me one Friday and expect it back
Monday.
-- thanks, Dave / Gadgets by Small
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 208 Sat Sep 09, 1989
S.NOAH at 00:45 PDT
Interesting blurb on the back page of the "Info-worlquirer". They say that the
TT will be the least expensive 68030 machine, of course they also have the
price pegged at about $1,500 ( about half of what I've read here on Genie ). I
wish that they were correct, but, like so much else they say, I don't beleive
it.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 209 Sat Sep 09, 1989
SLP at 07:49 EDT
The $3000 price passed around here was for a complete system with hard
drive, color monitor, and VAT. The $1500 price was just for the system unit
with one floppy and keyboard. I bet the price will be higher, but if it
comes in around $2,000 you'll here most of the complaining around here stop.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 210 Sat Sep 09, 1989
D.ENGEL at 08:49 EDT
About the EST... I hope that someone makes it clear that Genlock is not
built into the computer. The info going around now is somewhat unclear on
that point, and I see ST users talking about the 'built-in' Genlock on some
local BBSs. Just trying to nip a potentially dissappointing rumor in the bud.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 211 Sun Sep 10, 1989
DERRICK at 06:52 EDT
Dave, keep dreaming. THose TTs are for the Germanys like everything else.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 213 Sun Sep 10, 1989
DERRICK at 06:57 EDT
Dave, keep dreaming. Those TTs are for the GERMANS like everything else.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 214 Sun Sep 10, 1989
JEFF.W [RTC Sysop] at 13:55 EDT
Atari has been making it VERY clear that there is no genlock in the STE.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 215 Sun Sep 10, 1989
TOWNS at 14:21 EDT
Dave,
Interesting concept.. I will pass along your message.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 216 Sun Sep 10, 1989
V.ALBINO at 12:09 PDT
It was stated that the STE and TT are intended for two entirely different
markets. I believe this same statement was made when the Mega ST's were first
released. Yet, most people aspired to Mega ownership as a natural upgrade
path. Now, there will be TWO different paths one can choose if he wishes to
upgrade his ST system. He could go to a STE or a TT. If I were a developer,
I would be interested in writing for the largest possible user base. It
would seem, therefore, that people will write for the STE knowing that it may
run on the TT, but who is going to write for the TT--using its special
abilities--when that software will not function on the lower priced STE? I
still believe that Atari has "split the market," and this bothers me. I
still want to know why different versions of the TT are not being produced to
take care of the STE buyers rather than bringing out yet another 16 bit
computer based on the 68000.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 217 Mon Sep 11, 1989
J.H.CARROLL at 18:42 EDT
It seems real simple to me... the *TT* is the upgrade path from the ST. I
don't know about anyone else but fine scrolling, improved sound and quasi-
Genlock hardware (hehehe my trademark term) just aren't enough to have me
running out to sell my old ST. Quite simply, (as Towns said) the STE will
replace the ST line... In other words the consumers buying an ST for the first
time will buy an STE.
REAL upgrade paths involve more speed, more power etc and the TT is the way
to go. I really don't see any evidence of "market splitting".
Jon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 218 Wed Sep 13, 1989
TOWNS at 00:30 EDT
Finally.. a message I can agree with.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 219 Wed Sep 13, 1989
M.MURPHREE at 19:04 EDT
An open letter to Atari:
The introduction of the TT comes at a time when I have been considering an
upgrade. As an engineer (EE), I need a system with superior speed and display
capabilities, plus expansion capability (at the very minimum access to the
system bus). I expect this computer to used for current work activities,
hobby use, development use, and possible private business use later. I have
owned Atari products since 1978, and of course are considering the Atari TT
for a future purchase. There are few things that will effect my decision
though:
1. Packaging, internal expansion capabilities.
Let's face it guys the day of the console computer is gone.
The Atari 400,800; C64, VIC20 etc. were cute at the time,
but there is no excuse for it anymore. I wouldn't begin to
pay the price a Mega commands with the cheap housing it is in.
Likewise, if the stories about the TT case are true, forget it
I will buy something else.
2. Expandibility. Current rumours have that there is only one
expansion slot in the TT. This is barely acceptable, if the slot
must be used for expansion of the memory (preventing any other
additions then it is NOT acceptable.
3. Product support. If the TT does not have adequate product support
for a machine of this caliber, then it will not survive against
its many competitors.
4. Delivery schedules. If the TT doesn't make it to the market in
a reasonable time frame (please, no more escapades like TOS 1.4),
then another manufacturer's machine will be acquired.
Atari still has some loyal customers around, but that loyalty
has been stretched to the limits, guys...
Still waiting...
Mike Murphree
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 220 Wed Sep 13, 1989
S.NOAH at 20:11 PDT
About the TT only having one expansion slot, somebody correct me if I am
wrong, but can't you attach an expansion chasis to the VME bus ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 221 Wed Sep 13, 1989
CAPT.COOK at 23:56 EDT
Mike - Seems to me, it's kinda late for that message now. Hope it all works
out for you, though. -CC
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 222 Wed Sep 13, 1989
WHITESTR at 21:05 PDT
The upgrading of the ST to the STE strikes me as a brilliant
last minute marketing move. Kinda jabs *all* serious ST users
into upgrading to a new machine, while still supporting third party
developers such as the Genlock/4096 JRI man.
Surely its obvious by now that the TT is *the* next wave in
home computing power. The only thing that really seems to be
getting into STers way from cognizing this is the perpetrated idea
that the TT is not going to be *CHEAP*!
Those who believe that no one is going to develop specifically for the
TT are a bit behind the times, me thinks.
Personally, I don't doubt for a second that solid, reasonably priced
color boards will be out for the TT soon after its release.
Furthermore, I do not think that S.Tramiel has any intention of dragging
out US consumers in any way similiar to the 'old' ST days.
Just call me psychic...(:)
Dai Le'on--Whitestar Mageware
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 223 Thu Sep 14, 1989
JEFF.W [RTC Sysop] at 00:42 EDT
Thanks to K.BAD, we now have the original English text of the TT flyers handed
out at the Dusseldorf Atari Fair. It is THE_TT.TXT (file #12108) in Library
14.
Thanks, Ken!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 224 Wed Sep 13, 1989
S.NOAH at 22:41 PDT
I was just thinking ( it somtimes gets a bit dangerous when I do that ), since
the TT is so much faster than the ST, could it support a screen postscript
driver through GDOS. I remember that my early version of Touch-up came wit
its own screen driver which which displayed a set of outline fonts. Does this
sound like it might work ? Is GDOS on the TT the same as GDOS on the ST ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 225 Thu Sep 14, 1989
GW.MILLER at 09:02 EDT
I had the chance to play with a TT a few months ago. At that time I was
promised that Developers versions would be available in AUgust. (In my
excitement over the raw speed of this beast, I did neglect to determine August
of what year.)
After the horrendous marketing strategy of the ST, I'll have to wait until
the STE and TT's are really in stores available to the general public before I
get excited.
On the other hand, it's only 8 months 'til June when the STACY will be
available in quantity.
I heard a rumor that the Lynx will only be available in NYC and LA this
Christmas, and my questions about the Portfolio have been greeted by wild
laughter,
On the other hand, the Sharp is looking better and better. BTW, I put my
name on the list as a Portfolio developer several weeks ago, and still
haven't heard a word from Atari.
Guess I'll just be conservative on this one.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 226 Thu Sep 14, 1989
TOWNS at 17:20 EDT
George,
Who did you contact at Atari regarding becoming a developer for
Portfolio? Where are these questions that have been greeted by wild
laughter
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 227 Fri Sep 15, 1989
GW.MILLER at 09:09 EDT
Contact Gail Johnson about Developer Info. SInce MichTron stuck loyally with
the ST through the years, I thought we might experience some return from the
Portfolio.
Wild laughter? Every idea I come up with that depends on Atari delivering
a product to the market in quantity.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 228 Fri Sep 15, 1989
M.VEDERMAN2 at 19:04 CDT
I heard from a store in town (this is off subject...) that the portfolio
was 'in the warehouse' and will be shipping to the 'top 25' retail
store in the US. One in Houston included...
- mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 230 Fri Sep 15, 1989
BSTONE at 22:10 EDT
Is it true that only 25 dealers will get the portfolio??? I have heard a that
Atari had only 200 dealers and that half of them were Midi dealers. Now that
means that 75 dealers will not get any portfolios!! I know that if I was one
of the 75 shorted I would no longer be an Atari dealer!! I wonder when Atari
is going to learn that it needs its dealers a lot more then the dealers need
them?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 231 Sat Sep 16, 1989
V.ALBINO at 10:06 PDT
Does ANYONE know what the real shipping date of the TT is supposed to be? The
only thing official that I've heard is..."before the end of the year." The
Christmas season is almost here. Will the TT be able to take advantage of
that time of the year when most of the computer systems are sold, or will it
arrive too late? Just wondering.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 232 Sat Sep 16, 1989
TOWNS at 13:37 EDT
No release date has been announced. When we are ready for release, we
will post here.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 233 Sun Sep 17, 1989
S.NOAH at 00:34 PDT
Just curious, everything that I've read about the TT states that it has 512K
of ROM, what is going on in all that extra space ? Is this something that we
should look forward to ? Can anyone say anything about this ? No ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 234 Sun Sep 17, 1989
M.MURPHREE at 04:12 EDT
In Mr. Tramiel's CO, he mentioned that the TT would be released by the end
of the year. He neglected to mention in what country. I did notice their was
no Atari response to my earlier concerns and comments. I interpret this as
another unofficial Atari "No Comment...".
A side question, has anyone attempted to run the current version of
pc ditto on the TT? With the speed of the 16 Mhz 68030, the emulator should
be able to run at a reasonable speed, if compatibility has been maintained.
Mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 235 Sun Sep 17, 1989
DAVESMALL at 15:30 EDT
There's a lot of IFs there. Bill had to pull major magic to get the Ditto up
to its current speed -- he approached the theoretical limit of what is
*possible* -- and the 68000 and 68030 machines are different enough in places
it could trip things up. Even common stuff like MOVE SR,blah in user mode now
chokes.
But knowing Bill, he's probably moved it to another 030 platform and checked
it out. He's pretty sharp.
Atari: Am I now allowed to ask specific TT questions, bearing in mind that I'm
under nondisclosure, since it is now an announced product? Actually, Allan's
USENET posts tell me a great deal.
-- thanks, Dave / Gadgets
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 236 Sun Sep 17, 1989
TOWNS at 19:47 EDT
Sure, Dave.. ask away. If we can answer them, we will.
Mike, what was your question? I don't remember missing one..
If so, ask again. Maybe I can answer it this time! :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 237 Sun Sep 17, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 22:46 EDT
Hi folks
Towns why hasn't Gadgets and Avantgarde been sent TT's? They have the two
products that give the most attraction to NEW buyers and they also need the
most lead time. It's only in Ataris best interests!!!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 238 Mon Sep 18, 1989
GW.MILLER at 09:27 EDT
What about MichTron? We have the MOST products for the ST and have been here
the longest.
Of course, during a recent phone call to Atari I did have to explain that
Yes, MichTron did produce software for the ST. Seems the person had never
heard of us.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 239 Mon Sep 18, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 11:08 EDT
Sorry Gordon, but you are an ST developer and since you already obey the rules
on the ST your almost done before you start, it's the emulator guys,
especially Bill with HW, that need the most lead time to get there stuff over.
AND MAC AND IBM compatibility are I think the most important attributes of the
ST in the eyes of NEW buyers!!! So it's in ALL our best interests to slip Dave
and Bill a TT each!!!!
BTW TEMPUSII is the cats meow!!!! Thanks for bringing it to us.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 240 Mon Sep 18, 1989
PSINC at 12:16 EDT
I disagree Jim, people do not purchase a computer because it can emulate a PC
(maybe a Mac, because of the price difference). While Spectre 128 and Pc Ditto
are important products, we probably sell more Mouse Masters each month in the
US than they do. People want a computer system to fill their needs with the
existing software and hardware. Emulation is a nice extra.
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 242 Mon Sep 18, 1989
GORDON at 20:35 EDT
Jim did you buy your atari to get a PC or a Mac???
Nuff said...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 243 Mon Sep 18, 1989
D.ANDERSON22 [FastTech Rep] at 23:45 EDT
The point is made, Jim. You're undoubtedly right in that HW guys like Bill
and Dave, and even Mark (PS) and John Russell have the longest lead time, but
it only makes sense to give some level of support to the guys like Gordon, and
Nathan, and you, and Dan & Rick, and Liz & Kevin, and who-all else is out
there busting their caps to support Atari, as well. Get the machines to the
developers, to get the development started.
-Dave
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 244 Mon Sep 18, 1989
TLMAY at 20:55 PDT
Mark...
"We probably sell more Mouse Masters each month in the US than they [Avant
Garde and Gadgets] do."
I didn't know Avant Garde and Gadgets by Small sold Mouse Masters! <grin>
(Sorry, Mark, I couldn't help myself!)
I have a solution: Send TT's to MichTron, Avant Garde, Gadgets by Small,
Practical Solutions, CodeHead Software . . . and TERRY MAY!
...TERRY MAY!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 245 Mon Sep 18, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 23:57 EDT
Gordon....to get a MAC. Actually not the way you think though since I bought
my 1040 "BD-Before Dave" back in late 85'. I bought it because I wanted a
68000 system and couldn't afford $3000 for a MAC 128K. Gordon ther are 35
million PCs and 'bout 6 million Macs so I "THINK" people buy computers for PC
and MAC applications don't you? What I said was a MAJOR selling point for the
ST is that it provides Mac AND PC compatibility as well as some great SW and
features of its own. Where else can you say that at ANY reasonable price. You
can put a PC in your Mac, but PCDII will be faster than the Mac PC addons, and
you can't by a Mac emulator for the PC anywhere! So IF you put on your dealer
hat and face the facts that to be a Mac dealer it will cost you more up front
than becoming an ST dealer, and the same goes for BRAND name PCs. And IF you
sat back and thought about how much easier it will be selling STs if you can
say with a straight face...It's Mac AND PC compatible...you might have a
chance to make some money here.
The ST can be a vehicle to bring BOTH Mac and PC compatibility to the
personal computer user, as well as some nice stuff on its own. And it can do
this at a very reasonable price!
BUT, selling the ST without these things leads to it eventually shrinking
to the level of a curiousity! I would rather throw in with full compatibility
set since it has a better chance for long term success. It's not like this is
an insult, the STs most unique feature is it's compatibility, and with PC
speed addressed and Mac Clonehood just around the corner (TT is Appletalk
ready!!!) it could be the BEST computer a person could buy!!!! So it is in
Ataris best interest to get a TT to both Dave and Bill <period>. All the ST SW
developers will have an easier time of it fixing incompatabilities so the
earliest units should go to them!!!! And BTW Apple DOES NOT CHARGE it's most
important developers for new CPUs, like when the MACII came out. Microsoft and
others got free units, prototypes even, so they would have SW ready by the
time the thing was announced let alone shipping. The "rest" of the developers
got units after that and they paid for them. Hey, JRI got a TT before any of
us knew one existed!!!! Now that's early. So Mark I (as always) think I'm
right.
Jim <one mans opinion> Allen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 246 Tue Sep 19, 1989
TOWNS at 00:24 EDT
According to the information I have, JRI does not nor have they
ever had a TT prototype machine. This is a false rumor.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 247 Tue Sep 19, 1989
DOUG.W at 07:37 EDT
Even if Atari can't get machines to developers, some technical documentation
would be a *BIG* help! This would give developers some time to work out
solutions to any problems they might have (replacing timing loops, add support
for additional graphics modes, support multiple serial ports, etc.)
As it stands, the developers will be able to *start* work when the machine
is released, which is *MUCH* too late!
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 248 Tue Sep 19, 1989
PSINC at 10:53 EDT
Jim, i think you're letting your personal preferences get in the way of what
you think _other_ people want.
The machines should be made available to all developers. I could make a
case for any developer specifically (including us). The fact is that emulator
developers are not the _most_ important developers, I think Doug and Dave
would agree on that (and Bill too).
Besides, Atari will say it's PC and Mac compatible with third party
solutions anyway.;-)
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 249 Tue Sep 19, 1989
GORDON at 11:11 EDT
A quote from a magazine..
The fact is the Poquet seems to be the only small scale computer backed by a
true software strategy. We get a stone sense that Poquets founders much more
then other small scale hardware venders understand the key role that software
plays in determining whether a new machine files or flops. For the moment
Poquets software evangelism effort has focused on lining up a small but
carefully chosen suite of app- lications Lotus, Word Perfect, XYright, ACT,
agenda, ALphaworks and a few others. That legitimize the Poquet as a
mobile desktop.
Compare this to Atari.. To the best of my knowledge not one developer in the
US has a portfolio.. Not one developer has even the specs or information
sheet on the computer.
Yet they are shipping the computer. I have not even been offered the
oportunity to purchase one at any price.
The TT.. who knows it is months away..
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 250 Tue Sep 19, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 12:34 EDT
Mark...you're right, what I meant is really history anyway. When Atari had
only a few protos (you know..like last april) they should of place some at
STRATEGIC developer locations. NOW they damn well should get'em to ALL
developers, and at COST!!!! NOW!!! And where the hell is the INFO, like what's
the system variable that tells the application of processor type? Is Big A
going to wait until AFTER comdex to tell certain people? So I will drop the
subject Mark...you win.
John(Atari) I guess I was misinformed, BUT considering the ratio of my
being misinformed to YOUR being misinformed I think you should believe what
you hear on GEnie BEFORE you trust what is told to you from INSIDE the
company! Maybe John Russell didn't get a unit early, BUT I DOUBT IT
considering my source. And it does make sense since the genlock function is
needed to give good demos of the TTs abilities, and Atari has exibited a lack
of understanding as to HOW to do genlock right. You must learn how to
seperate the wheat from the chaff.
-Jim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 251 Tue Sep 19, 1989
NEVIN-S at 13:03 EDT
Yes, it is amazing that the TT is not available to developers now if it is so
close to shipping. Of course the logical deductino (oops, deduction) is that
it is NOT close to shipping at all. Oh well...
--Nevin
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 252 Tue Sep 19, 1989
J.MEEHAN3 at 22:43 EDT
ALLEN..
I did not buy my Mazda RX7 because it was compatible with a FORD, but it was
nice to know that it used the same fuel.
The ST is saleable on it own, but I agree that it is best to sell all it's
best points. The salesman should know his customers.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 253 Wed Sep 20, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 00:36 EDT
J.MEEHAN3...you're right, but I did buy my Corvette knowing that most
reasonable upgrades to the engine, etc. would be retrofittable. Like the 89
Z51 brakes, and the roller lifters, and the aluminum heads, and the better
alignment specs (kinda like TurboST in it's effect), etc, etc....thtas a stab
at the STE. And it uses the same small block chevy engine thats been around
for 30 years...it's\ compatible! the point is be compatible with what is
important, and both PC and Mac stuff is important. I have talked to dealers
that don't understand enough about Spectre so they don't carry it. They are
missing an opportunity just like Atari does when not facilitating certain
things in the world. Atari simply does not orchestrate marketing policies and
advantages as well as they could. We all suffer for it.
Right on Nevin
-Jim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 254 Wed Sep 20, 1989
CYCLONE at 00:01 CDT
Hey, here's a thought - perhaps what with Atari's newly-found ability to "keep
a secret", perhaps ALL the developers already have TT's, but they are just
pretending to be disgruntled so we'll all be totally surprised when the
machine comes out with TONS of software!!
- Bill (slightly optimistic this evening)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 255 Wed Sep 20, 1989
BREHBOCK at 01:15 CDT
Yea, that's the ticket! All the developers _do_ have TT's! ...And they were
all supplied by Atari for _free_! ...yea...And it's really a 25Mhz machine...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 256 Wed Sep 20, 1989
PSINC at 02:49 EDT
Ok with me Jim, let's just pick on Towns<grin>.
Seriously, if Atari wanted to support key developers (ourselves included) ;-
) They wouldn't have to spend much. There must only be a dozen or so.
We bought a IIx at half off list, _before_ the stores had it. And we have
info on System 7 _now_. Atari should really get it together!
I think that JRI had a STE, not a TT, but same thing. We still don't have
full specs on it.
Mark
PS - Cyclone, you're wrong. Atari PAID the developers to take TT's, that's
why we've been so quiet!;-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 257 Wed Sep 20, 1989
TLMAY at 01:39 PDT
Mark...
You've just described a good reason WHY Atari only has a dozen or so key
developers. If they supported their developers better (not to mention their
USER BASE), I guarantee you there'd be more than a dozen...
...Terry
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 258 Wed Sep 20, 1989
GORDON at 09:59 EDT
Aw common.. Atari supports us..
We got Towns on GEnie what else could we want. :-)
We called Atari yesterday and were told the developer information for the
portfolio would be out "any day now" and that we could purchase one for $399
and they gave us the 800 phone number. I can get a Sharp WIzard for $199.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 259 Wed Sep 20, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 10:38 EDT
Right on Mark, Iconfess I have a TT......
.....in my dreams! -Jim
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 260 Wed Sep 20, 1989
PSINC at 10:58 EDT
Really Jim? I thought you got the '040 machine.;-)
And you're right Terry...
Mark
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 261 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] at 17:14 EDT
Come on guys.........have you noticed how many messages John Townsend has
replied to in this area???
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 262 Wed Sep 20, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 17:42 EDT
Hi Darlah, we are just looking for the REAL DOPE ont the TT, you know stuff
thats important. The Atari dev area is about as informative on this subject as
this is.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 263 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] at 19:02 EDT
Hi there.....................;-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 264 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DERRICK at 19:09 EDT
All you guys that want a TT, MOVE TO GERMANY!
ATARI, have you ever consider moving your headquarters to Germany? I mean
since you guys are sending everything over there, you might as well. Also what
happen to the advertisement for the Portfolio? It is shipping right? This year
will be your make or break year! 3 pass by already and I've yet to see any
real support.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 265 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DARLAH [RT~SYSOP] at 19:11 EDT
They are advertising the Portfolio.......
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 266 Wed Sep 20, 1989
DERRICK at 20:04 EDT
DARLAH, they are advertising where, on the Atari Corp. billboard? see ya.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 267 Wed Sep 20, 1989
MRAYMOND at 22:22 CDT
Wait - I came to the Atari is err... a 68030--- no, wait a 68050 - yea that's
the ticket and the developers here are complaining... er well because they
don't have information on the chip, and it compiles too fast for them to see
the resultsnad a each machine is shipped - no a arrives hand delivered by Sam -
uh no Morgan Fairchild... That's why their busy, yea.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 268 Wed Sep 20, 1989
CAPT.COOK at 23:42 EDT
Derrick - Maybe the Atari Corp biiboard, but also the Wall Street Journal.
(The cynicism in here is starting to choke me -- to the point I can't even
spell) -CC
Q: What's the world's most thankless job?
A: Atari on-line representative.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 269 Wed Sep 20, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 23:46 EDT
It's also a pretty demanding job...lots of questions, questions, questions...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 270 Fri Sep 22, 1989
M.MURPHREE at 00:47 EDT
John, I believe its too late to resurrect the entirety of my original
questions and concerns. The main focus of it was for Atari to please realize
that consumers are very tired of the "toy" computers that have been produced
in the past, that do not lend themselves to being expanded or used in a
professional environment.
The TT should break new ground for Atari and show the world that they can
produce a professional system.
For my own use, considering the speed the TT should have, it would be very
desirable if through some software or hardware means it will be able to run PC
software at least at the speed of a low end AT if possible. This will
greatly increase the amount of software that can be run on the machine. Would
have replied sooner but software development stops for no one.... Over 2 meg
of source code and still not done!
Mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 271 Thu Sep 21, 1989
S.NOAH at 23:56 PDT
What will be the configuration of the VME slot on the TT ? I know that it is
only supposed to have one VME/DIN connector, but will it allow full height one
connector cards to be added to the system ?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 272 Fri Sep 22, 1989
D.ANDERSON22 [FastTech Rep] at 18:17 EDT
From what's been bandied about here and there, it is my impression that the
TT's slot is configured for "Eurocard" VMEs.
-Dave
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 273 Sat Sep 23, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 00:50 EDT
Yeah, but REAL eurocard is a 6U card meaning 2 96pin DIN connectors. Thats
what is so puzzling, the second connector has the upper 16 data bits to form a
32 bit bus?
Watch Atari invent a ASCI type VME bus!!!! That will need a VME host
adapter card to somehow propietarize the bus.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 274 Sat Sep 23, 1989
BREHBOCK at 02:25 CDT
John, are these bus answers on the don't talk-about-it list? I know it seems
silly, but is there any chance of posting an .IMG file or two of the TT's that
were over at the Dussledorf (sp?) show? I think it would make for a couple
happy campers here and there.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 275 Sat Sep 23, 1989
MAS2743 at 14:04 CDT
Gee - I haven't read this 230 messages in this topic yet! It sure sounds
verrrry intereesting to read them tonight.
...but uh, oh, here is the bad news...
Is it true that Atari President Sam Tramiel said that he hopes TT will clobber
NeXT and Mac II computer? Well, here is the news I read about in the
INFOWorld magazine April, 1989 (?).
Title: Mac II Programs Run Faster on Non-Apple Workstation Author: Laurie
Flynn
Sixty-Eight Thousand Inc. (so-called 68000 Inc), released earlier this month
a 68030-based workstation that the company says runs Mac software at several
times the speed of a Macintosh II.
The vendor inserts a Mac II motherboard into a floor-standing case, and then
swaps in a 32-Mhz Motorola 68030 microprocessor. The company then accelerates
the system's performance with the addition of the Pronto SCSI accelerator
from Golden Triangle, a math coprocessor, and a high-speed RAM cache.
The $15,000 machine includes 5 NuBus slots and comes with a licensed version
of the Macintosh system software.
The strategy of swapping a Mac motherboard into a non-Apple case is one
already followed by Colby Systems, which markets a line of Mac-clone laptop
computers.
Jim Takatsuka, an Apple VAR account executive, said that while the business
issues of such a strategy may be unresolved in the case of some companies, no
legal problems exist.
The base system includes the 68882 math coprocessor, RAM cache, Pronto
accelerator, 4 megabytes of RAM, and a 180-megabyte hard disk. Options (look
at that Atari!) includes a RISC microprocessor (Motorola 88000), a LISP engine
(for Artificial Intelligence application), and a Digital Signal Processor
(just like NeXT computer has), as well as an Ethernet card and high-capacity
WORM drive.
According to Sixty-Eight Thousand president Robert Meyer, most of his
customers are interested in simply running their Mac II applications faster,
rather than using the 68030-based workstation as a high-speed RISC or parallel
processing engine. It is the matter of their choice.
Sixty-Eight Thousand Inc. 26346 Carmel Rancho Lane Carmel, CA 93923; (408) 626-
1711 (tell them I sent you)
Now, if you wish, will that KILL, SQUASH, FLAP, OVERTHROW, ZAP, etc the Atari
new TT workstation? Remember, TT doesn't have most of the options as
mentioned above except for the VME card(s). Of course, Im a bit worry about
this kind of threat for Atari. I still like the TT price but TT lacks some of
the performance or options. I don't know if it will be possible for TT to
catch up with those kinds of bell-whistle. OR is it that Sixty-Eight Thousand
Inc. trying to deny the TT's existence or trying to scare Atari?
Towns, what do you think of it? Any comments?
Your informative friend, Mike
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 276 Sat Sep 23, 1989
BREHBOCK at 17:29 CDT
Mike, there's no comparison between the two machines. You can buy an ATW for
the prices you're throwing around.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 277 Sat Sep 23, 1989
A.FRIESEN at 21:10 MDT
No you can't! As far as I know the ATW is at least a year away!
Aric Friesen
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 278 Sun Sep 24, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 00:03 EDT
Don't forget the transputers in the ATW are geared toward image processing and
other highly parrallelizable things, an accelerated ...33Mhz, 128K cache,
etc...030 Mac II will kick the ATWs ass in ordinary desktop publishing
activities, only in highly tuned graphics activities...like renderman...can
the transputers shine. The ATW is nobody but Lucasfilms' desktop solution,
that's why you see all the transputers being used for digital video graphics
type applications...because the suck at the day to day activities of an
ordinary office environment. ATWs exist but so what, big deal we need a killer
TT. Anybody can have the equivalent of what 68000 Inc...boy is that
conseeded...is doing by buying the $5000 33Mhz 030 accelerator with cache the
daystar or siclone are selling for the Mac IIs. The equivalent can be built
for the TT too. So a killer TT is only as far away as the TTs delivery date.
When is that JOHN?
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 279 Sun Sep 24, 1989
PSINC at 11:21 EDT
Absolutely Jim. Transputers are _not_ suited for "regular" applications.
In November Apple will release the 25 mhz IIci, and in Febuary the _50mhz_
one! But they have not been just increasing processing speed, the new models
fully support multitasking and virtual memory. Also the prices are coming
down, and they're putting video and Ethernet on the motherboard.
Atari had better get with it!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 280 Sun Sep 24, 1989
M.LEDFORD at 16:15 EDT
An Open Letter to Atari:
This is being written just to get a load off my mind, but I hope in a way
that will be taken as constructive.
First, just to let you know that I am not a non-Atarian, I bought my first
Atari ST (1040) back in '86, coming from a Radio Shack TRS 80. I now own a
MegaST2 upgraded to 4 megs, which I use for publishing a couple different
newsletters. I also own a DeskJet, Migraph hand scanner/Touch-Up, a mono and
a color monitor. I am the secretary of our local Atari ST user group, and
have been with this group since its inception.
I find, along with many, many other loyal Atarians, that I struggle with a
love/hate relationship with Atari. I don't think that many other companies
that make other types of computers have as loyal a following (with the
exception, I think, of Amiga owners) as you do. But it seems to me that you,
out of ignorance or otherwise, end up giving us the cold shoulder. I am
referring to the lack of support that I have seen, both here on this BBS, and
with my local dealer.
Now I know that you have said that this is going to change, and perhaps you
are making a sincere effort in this direction. But I am brought back to
reality when I read the on-line talk here in the support areas. What I am
referring to specifically is the total lack of news regarding the new
computers that were (so long in being) announced. Not only are there no
updates on the new machines, there doesn't seem to be ANY information going
out to any of the developers.
You kept us in suspense for many months with your policy of not announcing
anything before it was close to being shipped, then after bringing out the
new STE and TT, you clamped the lid on the whole news outlet again! (Now I am
in agreement with you on waiting for products to be close to shipping before
making the announcements and whipping up the fanfare, but to deliberately
throw cold water on the new spark of interest doesn't make sense to me.)
I watched with interest when the Stacy was announced, knowing that this would
be a knockout if gotten to the market. What with all those people out there
who wanted a laptop Macintosh, this would have made the sales of that
computer sweet indeed! But as of this point in time, there still is no Stacy.
Now I have seen the advertisements for the laptop Macintosh, which will suck
away sales from Stacy.
I am very interested in the TT because of the advances that it will give to
users, and the extreme competition it will bring to other computer lines. But
I am afraid that there will not be any soon release of this machine. Too bad.
It makes it hard to root for you. The ST/TT line of machines are so good when
compared to all the others on the market, but the support for them just isn't
there!
Please!! Please!! Get some people that can get the information out, that can
get machines into the hands of the developers, that can answer at least some
of the questions that come up here in this area (or are at least allowed to
answer).
For myself, I am considering upgrading to the TT, but the total lack of
information of how things are going is really depressing. Please cheer us all
up with some crumbs from your table!!
Sincerely,
_|_
Mike |
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 281 Sun Sep 24, 1989
C.DAYMON at 17:05 EDT
Aric,
I DOUBT that your statement about ATW availability holds. Considering the TT
has yet to be released and the ATW is shipping to all the appropriate places
for a machine with an achitecture that is not well understood by most. The
british magazines report that every ATW they can make is being sold to
universities and developers. Usually configured to price in at about $40,000.
(Extra Transputers and RAM.) These are the ideal places to send a new and
innovative machine. Considering the advantage of an on-chip math coprocessor
and RISC processing, I think even 1 20MHz transputer could give a 33MHz 68030
a pretty fair run for its money. Again, the 68030 is a well understood chip
and top applications should appear almost immediately, but I think these will
be pale in comparison to the applications for the ATW 2-3 years from now.
(Reflect back on the CRAP that was available for the ST 3 years ago and the
68000 was rather well understood then.)
In the defense of the TT, I think it would be key to remember that the
Commodore 64 has outsold any other single computer to date. (Or at least
until very recently.) It certainly wasn't because it could outrun all the
competition, but probably because it offered the best dollar value. The Atari
8-bits could outperform it graphically and in processing speed.
This is possibly rumor, but I read where Atari has adopted the multitasking
system developed by Intelligent Music for future STs. I haven't seen this
operating system or read anything about it, but if this is true, it will mean
multitasking for the STs.
-Craig W. Daymon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 282 Sun Sep 24, 1989
BREHBOCK at 16:36 CDT
Mike Ledford: I LIKE YOUR LETTER!!!
I think it just might be a good idea for EVERYONE to capture it, adjust or
delete the equipment specifications to his/her needs and mail copies to Sam
Tramiel, Jim Fisher, Leonard Tramiel, Antonio Salerno, and Sig Hartmann at :
Atari Corporation
1196 Borregas Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA
94086
Something has to happen soon! There are a lot of Users, Developers, Dealers,
and maybe even employees that are very frustrated with the way things are
currently being handled. I can't help but feel that Sam and friends have to
really care deep down inside, but it must be getting badly misdirected
somewhere along the line. Something has to give!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 283 Sun Sep 24, 1989
GORDON at 19:13 EDT
Way to go Mike.. Only problem is that Jack and Sam dont read the messages on
here. Why not mail it to them.. Atari Corp
1196 Borregas Ave Sunnyvale, Ca 94088
I think everyone should write and tell Atari what you think of their dealer
and developer support. About all the new hardware we have seen in the past 3
years. Tell them what you think... I think Sam and Jack need to see an
outpouring of opinions.
Atari has never advertised in the US. All of their computers were sold
because people like you and me told our friends to buy them. I think Atari
is losing this. Would you recommend a friend to buy an ST???
or would you tell them to wait for an STE...or wait for a TT or buy something
else???
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 284 Sun Sep 24, 1989
J.H.CARROLL at 21:57 EDT
Its unfortunate that the case history of the Commodore 64 keeps coming back to
haunt us because that's probably some of the very essence of the trouble at
Atari. Fact is palin and simple : the 64 did well years ago when people who
bought computers did so with very different criteria in mind.
Price today plays a very small part in many people's computer buying habits.
They want a computer that will run the same kind or quality of pro programs
that they're using at work. They want something that has a large software
base for it with plenty of user support. People are smarter today. Even if a
68030 system is available, they're going to think twice if it doesn't have a
suitable number of slots (and *1* slot isn't suitable) etc etc. Its about
time we forgot about the 64. It wouldn't fare as well in today's market.
As for the Apple Mac IIci, its shippiong now-- no need to wait till Nov.
Jon
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 285 Sun Sep 24, 1989
A.RICHARDSO7 [ATW MAN!] at 22:51 EDT
I work for a company that's in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. Our situation reminds
me of Atari's: Lots of good ideas and people, but REAL short on cash. That
is the real problem with Atari, they need to work within their means to avoid
failures. Hey, Topic Police! HELP{!!!!!!!!
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 286 Sun Sep 24, 1989
J.ALLEN27 at 23:06 EDT
A.RICHARDSO7, Atari is a $400 million company and ain't in any financial
difficulty. In fact what the market analysts wnat to know is where is Atari
going...i.e. what new developments will continue to make Big A a good
investment. Chapter 11 they ain't in.
Craig, the transputer is a SERIAL processor, it doesn't have a 32bit wide
data/address bus, it is designed for processing ...in parrallel with other
TPs...serial data streams from sources like vidoe, if saddled with the need to
do a lot of random access 2D processing like in DTP applications it couldn't
keep up with an old grandmother let alone a 33Mhz 68030. You have swallowed
the ATW line...the universities in question aren't writing letters they are
doing image processing. The ATW and any other highly specialized computer is
suited for few purposes. The 680X0 and 80XXXs of the world are for the general
purpose random access type applications you use the ST for.
I bet TOWNS will not answer any of these technical questions no matter how
nicely he is asked, we need more in depth info ...so how does it feel to want.
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 287 Mon Sep 25, 1989
ISD [Julius] at 01:03 EDT
From futzing with early ATWs, and a prototype before that:
A 20 Mhz 68030 cleans a 20 Mhz T800's clock on integer benchmarks.
A 20 Mhz T800 cleans a 20 Mhz 68030/68882s or 20 Mhz 80386/80387s clock on
floating point benchmarks.
*If* you can get your program into the T800s on-board 4k RAM, then the integer
benchmarks are comparable to a 20 Mhz 68030.
Considerin that the T800 is a 'first' generation RISC chip and SPARC, MIPS,
88000, 80486, 68040 are 'third' generation RISC (or based on RISC-type
implementation in case of the latter two), the T800 is an olde f*rt as far as
RISC technology goes. It kills me when MIPS magazine benchmarks a prototype
25 Mhz 80486 system against a DEC MIPS based system running at 12.5 Mhz - and
the DEC beats most of the '486 benchmarks! Those dudes at MIPS technology are
doing good work...
The ATW is a excellent machine if you want to do parallel, distributed type
processing - the 'next' generation of computing. Current single processor
architectures can only be pushed so fast, the next step is more than one
processor working on the same, or different, thing. Those that learn parallel
programming will be ready for the next wave...at least I think so! <grin>
But then again, this is the wrong topic... :-)
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 288 Mon Sep 25, 1989
DOUG.W at 05:25 EDT
For more info on the TT, file #260 in the Gadgets RT is a compilation of
USENET notes concerning the TT. The file unARCs to over 100K of _very
interesting_ info!
--Doug
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 289 Mon Sep 25, 1989
GORDON at 12:20 EDT
Interesting tidbit in Computer Shopper... Mr Nagy says Sig Hartman is going to
resign if the TT is not out this year...
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 290 Mon Sep 25, 1989
NEVIN-S at 14:07 EDT
Sig Hartman has already decided to resign, as almost everyone in the ST
community knows. I don't think it has anything to do with the TT, though that
would make an elegant excuse.
The man has put in enough years and he is entitled to resign whenever he
wants.
--Nevin
------------
Category 14, Topic 35
Message 291 Mon Sep 25, 1989
TOWNS at 15:05 EDT
I have printed out the message that Mike wrote and the responses to
it. I will be passing those along to my boss, Antonio Salerno. I have
been passing along messages from this area for the last couple of weeks
and will continue to do so.
As for your questions, I didn't see any technical questions. Does anyone
have any? If I don't know the answer myself, I will try to find out what
I can.
-- John
------------