home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
No Fragments Archive 10: Diskmags
/
nf_archive_10.iso
/
MAGS
/
INFO
/
IINFO53.MSA
/
TEXT_FAST_T20.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1991-07-11
|
39KB
|
971 lines
FAST TECH'S T-20! STR InfoFile
==============================
THE GREAT T-20
from
FAST TECHNOLOGY
by Doyle Helms
"But officer, I was only doing 20...
Sonny, couldn't you see that the Chip is posted at 16?"
The following will be short, sweet and to the point. I have
attempted to capture some of the "real world" times (or benchmarks) for
some of the most common programs.
For safety sake, let me first list the results of some of the
benchmarks programs available for those of you who hold great faith in
them (grin).
Quick Index 2.1
Auto programs: NONE
Accessories: NONE
Monochrome 8Mhz 20Mhz
Function B.off B.on B.off B.on
--------------------------------------------
CPU memory 100 100 197 197
CPU register 100 100 254 254
CPU divide 100 100 254 254
CPU shifts 100 100 259 259
TOS text 100 110 202 196
TOS string 100 106 189 187
TOS scroll 100 132 115 141
GEM dialog 100 133 195 239
--------------------------------------------
Now let's load the system down (or up) some.
Auto programs: TurboMono 1.84, G+Plus, LGSelect, Hotwire 3.0,
DCshowit, DCmshift, Codekeys
Acc.'s: G+Plus (mini), Hotsaver, Multidesk, Codekeys
Monochrome 8Mhz 20Mhz
Function B.off B.on B.off B.on
--------------------------------------------
CPU memory 91 91 189 189
CPU register 91 91 244 244
CPU divide 91 91 244 244
CPU shifts 91 91 248 248
TOS text 172 172 406 406
TOS string 1161 1168 2558 2558
TOS scroll 124 127 139 139
GEM dialog 232 245 448 473
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Now for one more benchmark program from Jim Ness(NBM 0.7)
| 8Mhz | 20 Mhz
Function | B. off B. on | B. off B. on
--------------------------------------------------------
Math test(cache) 16.55 18.07 7.51 7.86
Memory fetch/store 16.23 17.71 8.88 9.37
Dialog box draw 22.84 16.14 13.40 9.43
Floppy read/write 59.35 38.98 59.35 38.38
--------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Now to the "Real World BenchMarks"(or what the mind perceives
as real).
I will be running the RWBM's with the system "loaded" as
shown above in Quick Index 2.1 (BM #2).
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Test 1: CALAMUS
Calamus load and display a full page DOC file of 127K
(390 frames):
8Mhz= 49.9 secs 20Mhz= 23.3 secs
Change view and redraw from FULL page to ZOOM setting:
8Mhz= 7.8 20Mhz= 3.8
From ZOOM to FULL view:
8Mhz= 12.3 20Mhz= 6.4
Print file in Landscape Mode(180x180 Epson LQ510 24 pinner):
8Mhz= 4min 56 secs 20Mhz= 4min 15secs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TEST 2: PageStream 1.8
Load and display DOC file(306492bytes)
8Mhz= 12 secs 20Mhz= 6.3
Change view from NORMAL to FULL:
8Mhz= 6.14 20Mhz= 2.52
Change view from FULL to 200%:
8Mhz= 16.3 20Mhz= 6.3
Change from 200% to NORMAL:
8Mhz= 7.3 20Mhz= 3.1
Print file 180x180 dpi on Epson LQ-510 (24 pin)
8Mhz= 5min 35 secs 20Mhz= 3min 41secs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Now for a couple of the commonly used program among
computerists.
TEST 3: UNLZH172.PRG
UnLZH of a file (1029532compressed/2196729uncomp.)
Total files in LZH is 10 (219672 bytes average size)
8Mhz= 3min 31 secs 20Mhz= 1min 26 secs
TEST 3b:LHarc 1.1319 (Quester)
Move 10 files (219672 average size) into Archive.
8Mhz= 16minutes 20Mhz= 6min 47 secs(wow!)
UnLZH (Extract) same file w/ Quester 1.1319
8Mhz= 4min 41 secs 20Mhz= 2minutes
TEST 3c:ARC 6.02
Move same 10 files into archive using 6.02:
8Mhz= 13min 37 secs 20Mhz= 5min 43 secs (oh yea!)
UnARC (Extract) same w/ 6.02
8Mhz= 5min 4 secs 20Mhz= 2min 13 secs
TEST 3d:Dcopy 3.6
Move same 10 files into archive using Dcopy 3.6:
8Mhz= 6min 6 secs 20Mhz= 2min 41 secs
UnARC (Extract) same w/Dcopy 3.6
8Mhz= 4min 3 secs 20Mhz= 1min 50 secs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Now for something completely different...
These two tests will consist of using some of the functions (options)
in Touch-Up and MVG. This will also include load times for compressed IMG
files.
TEST 4: TOUCH-UP & MVG
Program load:
TOUCH-UP
8Mhz= 7.7secs 20Mhz= 4.3secs
MVG
8Mhz= 2.4 20Mhz= 1.9
Load IMG file: TOUCH-UP MVG
Filename size sec(8Mhz) sec(20Mhz) sec(8Mhz) sec(20Mhz)
1.IMG 85658 59 24 5.2 2.5
2.IMG 54922 68 27 4.3 2.3
3.IMG 79614 58 23 4.6 2.5
4.IMG 109771 70 28 6.2 3.0
5.IMG 67487 64 25 4.4 2.4
6.IMG 19932 13 5.7 1.4 0.9
7.IMG 114377 69 28 6.2 3.2
8.IMG 45431 28 11 2.8 1.5
9.IMG 42818 31 13 2.8 1.5
10.IMG 41376 31 13 2.8 1.5
----------------------------------------------------------------
22avg. 49avg. 4.06avg. 2.13avg.
TEST 4a: TOUCH-UP function times:
10.IMG file used for below tests.
*Clean up(Both):
8Mhz= 22secs 20Mhz= 10.8secs
*Bold(horz&vert):
8Mhz= 15.6secs 20Mhz= 7.9secs
*Outline:
8Mhz= 25.9 20Mhz= 9.9
TEST 4b: MVG function times:
7.IMG file used for below tests.
*Rotate 90:
8Mhz= 20.7secs 20Mhz= 8secs
*Dither(option 1 Lighten & Darken):
8Mhz= 21.8secs 20Mhz= 8.5secs
*Flip Horz:
8Mhz= 7.5secs 20Mhz= 3.4secs
*Flip Vert:
8Mhz= 1.2secs 20Mhz= .9sec
*Resize:
(75%)
8Mhz= 23.2secs 20Mhz= 8.8secs
(50%)
8Mhz= 12.7secs 20Mhz= 5.0secs
(25%)
8Mhz= 5.1secs 20Mhz= 2.1secs
*Shrink (Darkest & Lightest):
8Mhz= 14.8secs 20Mhz= 5.6
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TEST 5: Word Writer
(Search for xxxyyyzzz & Replace with aaaaaaaa)
Test file STR 720(xxxyyyzzz planted at end of file)
STR 720 Load:
8Mhz= 28.1 20Mhz= 13.4
Search & replace:
8Mhz= 27.5 20Mhz= 14.1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion:
After using this board for only a few days I have found it VERY dif-
ficult to return to 8Mhz mode! The speed increase is EXTREMELY nice and
the "wait states" are almost none existent!
I cannot say enough good stuff about this high quality product, so I
will just let the above stated numbers do the talking(they can be much
more eloquent). Customer service at FaST Tech is above reproach. I had
some slight trouble with MY Mega and not T-20 and Jim Allen helped me to
rectify it when he was under NO obligation to do so! Thanx Jim!!!
Hopefully the above information will help in your decision to
purchase the new T-20(Turbo 20) accelerator board from:
FaST Technology
14 Lovejoy Rd.
Andover MA. 01810
(508) 475-3810).
Any questions concerning the T-20 test results should be directed to me at
D.HELMS(GEnie) or STARTWO (Delphi-The ST Advantage!)
________________________________________________________________
From Jim Allen (FAST Tech) about his new '030 boards - from the ST
Roundtable on Genie...
...I will introduce the TinyTurbo030 and Turbo030 later this month...
both have a 68000 to run old SW. It's doubtful that ANY up-grade will
be usable inside the MSTE unless its guts are moved into another case.
There is just no room, especially around the 68000 chip.
...the Turobo030...basically uses multiple mechanisms to achieve
speed. It has a cache like the T20, only using 20ns rams instead of
100ns ones, and it also optionally has 4/16 Meg of 32bit ram. The ram
is optional because the cache alone gives the system a healthy boost,
and when the 32bit ram is installed the cache is there to speedup
video accesses...ST or video card.
The 32bit ram is real "page mode" in that we really use the page mode
operation, a page is 128 longwords in length, so when the 030 is
hanging around "on page" the rams run almost like static rams. We use
1Megx4 static column rams just like the Amiga3000, for maximum speed,
and low power usage. It's a very sophisticated ram design with 030
burst cycles as quick as 325ns, which compares to 4000ns on a stock ST
to move the same amount of data. The Turbo030 is 40Mhz, and we will
only be making it at that speed.
That's mighty quick, but the 030 price is still reasonable thanks to
the MacIIfx and Apple's volume buying. The floating point performance
of the Turbo030 is 78% the speed of the MacIIfx...a cache card later
will even up the score. I am planning on a 32bit cache card for the
T030 that also fits the TT, killing two birds with one stone. You will
be amazed how much quicker a TT is with a cache card, the TT video
memory is only twice as fast as the ST...same speed, twice as wide...
the cache card will spiff it right up. Hope that wets your lips.
I don't know what will be required to get Spectre to deal with the
ram, the TURBO030 is an ST accelerator.
As of September this year we will be able to provide 16Megs of 32bit
ram, which is in addition to the 4Meg in your Mega....using only 8
static column drams...I'll have one 16Meg machine for Dusseldorf and
WAACE show demos. The chips will be on sale in Sept. Only engineering
samples are available now.
Pricing will be introduced later in the month....
> FAST TECH ONLINE STR Feature DELPHI'S FAST TECH CONFERENCE
============================
Good evening, and welcome to DELPHI's ST Advantage. Tonight we're
pleased to have Jim Allen, of Fast Technologies, as our guest for a Formal
Conference. For those of you who don't about Jim, he is the creator of
the T16 accelerator board, which makes your ST run at about twice the
speed it used to before you installed the T16. And he is busy working
on two newer, faster accelerators, the T20, an even faster version of the
T16, and a 68030 board, that uses Motorola's 68030 chip to replace the
stock 68000 chip. (There is a great deal more involved, but Jim can talk
about that.)
That said, is there anything you'd like to say first, Jim?
FASTTECH>
Sure, first I'd like to say it's nice to be on Delphi, I kept
messing up appointments but finally got here!! Tonight, I'd like to
answer questions about the TURBO20 and some about the TURBO030 that
will be announced formally in a few days.
The TURBO20 is our latest wonder, it is a 20Mhz 68000 accelerator,
that uses a 16Mhz chip and a 20Mhz oscillator, and a number of neat
tricks to get as much performance as possible out of the poor old
68000 chip ;-)
It has been ported to the Amiga (ouch) and Mac, and will soon be THE
premiere 68000 accelerator in the world. We've received some good
news, that many of our European competitors have dropped out of the
speedup business, so the T20 on the Atari has a bright future.
An overview:
The TURBO20 uses a static ram cache, a small high speed memory, plus
the higher operating speed of a 20Mhz processor clock, to give your
ST a boost to just over 2X performance in most typical real world
uses. It has the ability to switch back to true 8Mhz to allow the use
of older speed sensitive SW, and also has cache on/off, and video
board caching on/off controls. Our STE adapter is planned to have the
same autoswitching setup as the MegaSTE so that speed and cache
on/off will be controlled by the new XCONTROL panel as if your STE
was a MSTE. The videoboard caching on/off is used when a board like
the Maxon MGE card, which has a coprocessor on it, is used. Caching
is not allowed when "other" processors might be altering the data
without the T20 knowing about it.
The board is as long as the 68000, and about 3/4" wider. So it still
fits everything, except the STacy is still a real pain... but doable.
That's about it for features, we gave up on "fast rom" since the ROMS
needed are just too expensive, and the speed increase isn't worth the
cost.
Take it away Gordie...!
.Gordie>
Okay, anyone have any questions? <grin>
.Matt>
Well, I was wondering if a T030 would fit in a STacy?
.FASTTECH>
Very doubtful to no ;-) But there will be a 520/1040 version of the
T030 that will fit, it's about the size of a PCspeed. GA
.Matt>
When is it due out?
.FASTTECH>
Depending on how busy we are with the T030, by August. I'd like to
show it at Dusseldorf, and ship by Sept. GA
.Matt>
ahh thanks. GA
RMORROW>
What kind of prices are you talking for a T030 or T20? I don't need
a rocketship, just a dragster..<G>
.FASTTECH>
The TURBO20 is $329, the STE adapter is $49, and the TURBO030 is
still in the air.
.FASTTECH>
The TURBO030 has two models, both 40Mhz units, with 68030 included.
The low cost model has cache only, like the T20, but MUCH FASTER...
it runs around 5X in speed improvement. It will retail for $849. The
same board, with the ram circuit populated, has 4Megs or 16Megs of
very, VERY fast static column ram (like the A3000) and will retail
somewhere under $2000. So, it will be competitive with the
"competition". It will also be quite a bit faster ;-)
.Gordie>
Can you grow the base model up to the high end model?
.FASTTECH>
The cache-only model can be upgraded... by FAST TECH... for the
difference in price between the two units. The board is 5"x5" and is
all surface mount design. It has seperate CPU & FPU clocks, the
50Mhz 68882 option is $300. The FPU operates at up to 75Mhz without
any trouble!! The TURBO030 also has a 68000 chip onboard so you can
run any and all ST Software when you want...just flip a switch ;-)
.Dana>
OK, Jim, business aside <<grin>>, now that the T16 is no longer
available with a 520 w/ 2.5 megs, what would you recommend for the
user who wants that occasionally needed extra speed running such
things as DTP, etc., and if I upgraded to a MSTE, would I be able to
port the accelerator to the new machine?
FASTTECH>
I'd buy a T20, Dana, and be very happy with it!! Occasional use is
NOT what the TURBO030 is targeted at, the T20 makes much more sense,
and will make your life much easier...newsletter-wise ;-) GA
.Dana>
hehe, would I be able to take the T20 out and move it to a MSTE? GA
.FASTTECH>
Yes Dana, you can move it to an STE, the MSTE is already accelerated,
I'd sell the 520/T20 combo and get the MSTE when upgrade time came.
GA
.Dana>
Thanks Jim. GA
RMORROW>
What's the difference between static ram and dynamic ram that you've
been talking about? ga
.FASTTECH>
Dynamic ram is really only half the ram chip. The rest of the "chip"
is made up of other ICs. By throwing out a lot of functions, you can
pack many more bits in the chip. The downside is you need support
circuits to keep things ticking. Also, simpler storage cell design
saves space for even greater increases in how many bits the chip can
hold. But refresh circuits that keep this simpler storage mechanism
alive add to the over all complexity.
Also, all this "off chip" stuff slows down the overall cycle time
that a dynamic ram memory can have. Static rams use advanced storage
techniques, and have everything required to be a ram onboard, so
they're easier to use, faster, but much less dense. So you use Drams
for large memory systems, and little SRAM caches to make those DRAMS
look good ;-) At least that's the way the world works so far. GA
RMORROW>
Wow...Thanks. GA
.Raven>
I came in late, so I don't know if you covered this, but why would I
want to buy a TURBO030 board as opposed to an SST? ga
.FASTTECH>
Simply because it's FASTER and has features that set it WAY apart.
Some of this I won't talk about yet, but there are some very unique
aspects to the T030. I wouldn't have done it if I thought there would
be any question as to choice ;-) GA
.Raven>
Do you have benchmarks on both boards? How about cost difference?
.FASTTECH>
The benchmarks will be released in a week or so. I am licensing some
software goodies for the roms that affect overall speed. Until that's
settled, I don't want to go babbling numbers.
.Raven>
I look forward to the info. Could we get it put up online here?
.FASTTECH>
I can tell you the typical access time for ram is 75ns, with 275ns
bursts where appropriate. The TT runs about 400ns bursts.
Yes!! I will make sure it gets up here same day as GEnie... that's a
promise. GA
.Raven>
Thank You. GA.
.Dave>
Jim, does the T20 come with a math coprocessor for us Spectre owners
<ducking :)> GA
.FASTTECH>
The 68000 chip uses the 68881/2 in a different manner than the 68030
chip does, so having one wouldn't help, unless you had software
specifically written for it. Dynacadd is an example of an ST app that
is written FOR IT. But you can get a JRI 25Mhz FPU board and add it
to the T20... or buy it from me that way... and get an FPU. It won't
help under Spectre though. That gets real complicated, SANE library
stuff etc. GA
.Dave>
Thanks Jim. GA.
.Schuylar>
The speed you stated above for the TT? Was that with or without
TTRAM, and will you be doing any boards for the TT? ga
.FASTTECH>
That's TTram... 400ns burst, the ST ram is 1 access (32bits) every
500ns time period just like the ST. Same as the ST, just 32bits
wide ;-) I am waiting to see whether the TT will be pushed hard, if
so I WILL do a combination TURBORAM/cache card for it. TURBORAM is
what we call the ram on the TT030 and it has some unique aspects ;-)
I believe Atari has done some good things to the TT very recently
that will make it a much better product soon. GA
.Schuylar>
Thanks, ga
.Gordie>
When you mentioned the ability to change the speed and caching, is
that software addressable, or is it a hardware thing? ga
.FASTTECH>
The T20 is set up for it to be HW only, the STE adapter will have the
software control on it. The board just would have gotten too big
otherwise. Most people will just use a HW switch to go between 20
and 8 at powerup. GA
.Gordie>
Is that STe adaptor shipping real soon now? <g> Or did you actually
get the info you needed? Finally. ga
.FASTTECH>
It is real soon now. I'm still waiting for the info. So I will just
pull xcontrol apart and figure it out myself. I would have liked
Atari to cough up the "standard" but that's a waste of time I guess.
GA
.Gordie>
That's too bad. But...
RMORROW>
Are your products compatible with software accelerators like Quick
ST? Is the effect additive? ga
.FASTTECH>
Yes!! In fact, TURBO20 is bundled with TURBOST, the super-duper SW
accelerator. And a new version of TURBOST will be out this summer
that is even better!!! The effect is definitely ADDITIVE. GA
RMORROW>
thanks ga
FASTTECH>
It's compatible with QuickST, but it comes with TST ;-)
.Dave>
How does PC Ditto run on the T20? GA.
.FASTTECH>
Good Question. The Floppy code is too speed sensitve, so I haven't
been able to find out yet :-( I have someone working on a patch
program to slow down the loops and make it stable again. GA
.Dave>
Thanks Jim, GA.
JBEAU>
I hate to be the one to ask blatant A or B questions, but I have been
seriously looking at the ADSpeed from ICD... Would you care to mark
the two side-by-side?
.FASTTECH>
B...that's my favorite. I don't like to cut into "other" products. I
can simply say the T20 is faster, and we've been at this a lot
longer. GA
JBEAU>
How about $ comparison?
.FASTTECH>
The T20 is $329, the Adspeed is around $249? I think, but mailorder
can have a drastic affect on price. It's a case of $ for MPH ;-)
JBEAU>
Which do you think would be easier for a person like ME to install
or are both meant for a dealer to do?
.FASTTECH>
It's a tie on the install. Both need the 68000 yanked, and that is
NOT for the faint at heart. We sell through lots of dealers that have
good techs for the install. GA
JBEAU>
I am, like Dana, a serious DTP worker... and the accelerator is
guaranteed to work with big programs like CALAMUS with no :( ?
.FASTTECH>
It makes Calamus scream!!! It's only some games and really speed
sensitive utility software... like floppy formatters... that can be
adversely affected.... and Spectrum of course ;-)
JBEAU>
:) GA
.Gordie>
How about Pagestream? ga
.FASTTECH>
Pagestream, too... all the major apps have never had trouble with
accelerators. GA
.Raven>
If we bought an accelerator from a mail order outfit that did not
install, could we send it to you? How much, how long?
.FASTTECH>
I have done this rarely. It's not something we want to make a policy
since it is very time consuming. We can refer you to any one of a
dozen great dealers that will do fast turn around in the $50-75 range
plus shipping. GA
.Raven>
Sounds good. GA
.FASTTECH>
STE installs WILL be user installations!!! Just plug it in!!! GA
.Dave>
So T20 STE installs are as easy as SIMM installs <grin>, how come? GA
.FASTTECH>
Not quite as easy, you need to take off one more shield, but the
68000 is in a SOCKET!!! Yeah!!! GA
.Gordie>
Really, Jim? My 68000 is socketed? Cool.
.FASTTECH>
So far ;-)
.The Lone STacy>
Well, back to the Stacy, the 520 T30, what is the difference between
this one and the two you mentioned <kicking dead horse>. GA
.FASTTECH>
The Tiny TURBO030 is a cache-only version that is very tiny, hence
the name. This is our finest effort in minaturization, and even the
ROMs with TOS 2.0X are little SMD chips! And the price will be around
$599...don't hold me to it though ;-)
.The Lone STacy>
sounds...small :) What will be the speedup?
.FASTTECH>
Actually smaller than the PC Speed board. It has to be to fit all
models. GA
.The Lone STacy>
Will it give say 3x my prsent speed? GA
.FASTTECH>
The worst case on the cache-only board is 3X... actually 60% in pure
memory movement like QIndexs scroll test... but 5X in most real world
stuff, like scrolling or redrawing in Calamus, etc. Surprisingly
quick actually. GA
.The Lone STacy>
WOW! Could make a real handy portable. Thanks. GA
.Gordie>
Will the Tiny TURBO030 work with the STe's. ga
.FASTTECH>
That's the idea Gordie, to fit in all ST(e)s and work. As an example,
load a 300K 7,000 line file into Tempus...already quite fast... an ST
takes 22 secs to scroll to the end of the file, the cache-only T030s
take only 4.5 secs!!! It's scary from such a small setup.
.Gordie>
Great. Another way to get a headache with my ST. <grin>
RMORROW>
Will owners of T16's be able to upgrade to T20's, like Atari Canada's
8-bit-for-ST deal? ga
.FASTTECH>
Yes, the current T16 owners get $89 off he T20 price, the offer is
extended to Sept 30th... since there are few mags to get the word out
in...and you get to keep the T16 ;-) Just send it back to be "marked"
Only one upgrade per T16 ;-)
There will be such a deal on the TURBO030 board also!! More $$ off of
course ;-) GA
RMORROW>
thanks..ga
.Dave>
Jim, the Tiny Turbo is a cache-only board; does this mean the only
diff between that and the T20 is the 030 and TOS 2.0X chips. Does it
still use 32K of cache memory? The 030 speeds it up that much, wow!!
GA.
.FASTTECH>
Yes Dave, the Tiny T030 adds the 030... still has a 68000!! And the
TOS ROMs, and adds just $270...don't hold me to that ;-)
.Dave>
Thanks Jim, see you at Atari Day! GA.
L_RYMAL>
Hi Jim, I'm slightly confused. Is the Tiny T030 upgradeable on memory
like the Turbo030? ga
.FASTTECH>
No, it has no DRAM memory, it just speeds up your ST using cache
memory. The whole DRAM system uses far too much space to squeeze
under the hood of a 1040 ;-) GA
.Gordie>
Okay, so you're saying you have 4 products. The Turbo20, the Tiny
Turbo030, the naked Turbo030, and the full-dress Turbo030. Is that
right? And the approximate prices are, $330 for the Turbo20,
tentatively $600 for the Tiny Turbo030, $900 for the naked Turbo030,
and under $2000 for the Full-dress Turbo030?
.FASTTECH>
That's about it. GA
SCOTTJ>
Jim, is it possible to add a 68040 to the ST or at least to a TT?
.FASTTECH>
It is possible. I have made arrangements with a Mac accelerator
company to license their ASIC chip for the ST market. It would make
an 040 daughter board for the T030 a much simpler job. But it will be an
expensive proposition for a few more months. I would expect Atari
themselves to be working on such a thing for the future. Let's hope!
;-) GA
SCOTTJ>
How much would it cost? Will we see it anytime soon? GA
.FASTTECH>
Chips like that don't cost a lot, the 040 costs ;-) I won't even
start to worry about it until fall, but the T030 is definitely setup
with that in mind for the future. GA
SCOTTJ>
What about a RISC Chip, like the 88k or Sparc? I've heard that there
are 68000 emulators for them. GA
.FASTTECH>
Won't happen, software is the trouble. There is always Sun though ;-)
Yes, an emulator would do the job, but the machines cost $$... $5K
minimum. GA
SCOTTJ>
Thanks. Jim.
.Gordie>
Well, Jim, it's getting pretty late, so I'll try to wind this down.
.FASTTECH>
Okay by me. GA
.Gordie>
Would you say something about how you perceive the future of the
ST/TT's here in North America? ga
.FASTTECH>
Not if my life depended on it ;-)
.Gordie>
hehehe.
.FASTTECH>
Actually, the ST is still a good value, it does the job... whatever
the job is... and so as a purchase I'd recommend it. But if you can
afford a Mac, it's mighty tempting ;-0 GA
.Gordie>
Yes, reality does intrude at times, doesn't it?
.FASTTECH>
Yep.
.Gordie>
Well, that about wraps it up. I'd like to thank Jim for joining us
here on Delphi, and I'll see about getting him here on a more regular
basis. If the rest of you don't mind, of course. <grin>
.Matt>
<applause>
.Gordie>
Any closing comments, Jim?
.FASTTECH>
Nope, just thanks a bunch for inviting me, I really enjoyed the
visit. I'll try to make it by more often, and will put up the T030
intro when I do GEnie!! Bye folks!!!
.Gordie>
This CO is officially over.
Again, thanks to JBEAU for doing most of the gruntwork in editing
this transcript. His work saved me a couple of hours of staring into
my Omnimon. My eyes appreciate it! <grin> --Gordie (aka BIBLINSKI)
*************************************************************************
This conference transcript is the exclusive property of the ST Advantage
on DELPHI. Permission to reprint is granted only if this notice is
included with the transcript and left unchanged.
************************************************************************
> TURBO 20!! STR Spotlight "The Turbo 20 board is a VERY solid!"
========================
THE T-20 IS FOR EVERYBODY!
==========================
by Doyle C. Helms
I know in my "Real World BenchMarks" article a couple of weeks ago I
said I would let the numbers do the talking for the the TURBO-20 (T-20)
accelerator because they could be much more eloquent than I in describing
the fine product from FaST Technology. Well to hell with eloquence, I've
got to tell you some more about this excellent product I've used over the
past several weeks!
The Turbo 20 accelerator board is a VERY solid and dependable add-on
from ANY ST/MEGA. I have used this unit for several weeks now and I have
experienced NO difficulties with software crashes and etc. I now wish I
had acquired a T-16 board when they first came out. I had read and heard
from various sources way back then that the T-16 was an improvement, but
was that increase worth the money?
The comments I saw and heard was that unless you were a hardcore
DTP'er or CAD user it really wasn't worth it. Well let me tell you
friends, those people that said and wrote those comments are no longer on
my list to buy anymore swampland in Florida from <wide grin>!
The T-20 is for everybody! Normal everyday use of the ST/Mega is
GREATLY ENHANCED. The Desktop windows update so quickly that I have hit
the update (Esc) key again to update the window because I didn't think it
had done so when I first did an update keying when I changed disks.
Using the ST/MEGA with T-20 installed is like it was going from the
ol' 800 to the ST/MEGA as far as the perception of the speed increase!
Granted that there is more to an ST than just the speed increase (e.g.
Desktop, mouse and etc.) Speed of process is definitely a factor.
Let me clarify at the juncture that not all programs are accelerated
by this or any other 68000 accelerator.
Games, most of all graphic games are not "speeded up" as in getting
from point A to point B any faster. Take Falcon for example. I was a
little ambivalent about flying Falcon at twice the speed and getting shot
down twice as fast <g>. Well, the speed increase with Falcon as with most
games is not in overall speed increase but with smoother animation. These
games and some other programs like WordWriter, rely on the system clock to
carry out instructions. So even if you ran Falcon on a TT you would not
get from home base to the target any faster.
Applications such as WordWriter, the scrolling of the cursor with ar-
row keys would not be 2 times the speed. This is because the programming
is set up to control the speed of this operation. Check out Tempus if you
want to see what releasing the cursor to full speed can look like! Paging
in WordWriter, (clicking in the scroll bar) would show an increase though.
Search and replace functions and such are greatly increased also.
GFA Basic Editor shows almost no increase (it is already FAST!). The
programs, either run from the editor or compiled, shows an appropriate
increase in execution. The compiling of programs is also increased
substantively.
DESKTOP PUBLISHING AND GRAPHIC DESIGN PROGRAMS
----------------------------------------------
Calamus program loads from disk very quickly (the disk access is not
speeded up, just the execution of the code after normal disk loading
time). If you read my real world benchmarks in STReport 724 you will
notice a decrease in time to load a LARGE CDK file and display it in 20Mhz
mode vice the 8Mhz mode. 49 Secs to load and display in 8Mhz is not a LONG
time you say. No it isn't for just a one time load. The "small" difference
between the 8Mhz L&D(Load and Display) time and the L&D of the 20Mhz is 26
seconds. You save more time (26 seconds) in 20Mhz the it actually takes
to L&D in 20Mhz vice 8Mhz. Confused? As started before, L&D in 8Mhz is 49
seconds, 20Mhz L&D time is 23 seconds. This comes to a savings of 26
seconds.
The screen redraws when scrolling around a document is VERY fast com-
pared to 8Mhz.Think about doing this and other L&D's over the course of
many hours and you can begin to see the finger tapping factor is greatly
reduced! The other functions in Calamus is GREATLY (close to twice in
most cases) reduced. Again reference the ST Report 724 T-20 benchmarks.
The same can be said for PageStream (1.8) in execution times of func-
tions and L&D's. The bigger difference of speed increase between
PageSTream and Calamus is the printout time. PageSTream print time is cut
by a larger margin that the one in Calamus.
Touch-Up is one of the programs that GREATLY benefits from the T-20.
The MAJOR gripe I had with Touch-Up was the excessively slow load time of
IMG files. The average L&D for a 66K IMG file is 49 seconds for 8Mhz and
22 seconds for 20Mhz mode. The T-20 was/is a godsend for Touch-Up users!
MVG. Well this program is already a fireball when it comes to speed.
The same 66K IMG file L&D time for MVG is 4 seconds for 8Mhz and 2 seconds
for 20Mhz. The difference of L&D is still about half, but to the human-
(and my sometimes sub-human<g>) mind the difference of 2 seconds is almost
imperceivable. Reference the function times in MVG. A 90 degree rotation
time of 20 seconds in 8Mhz vice 8 seconds in 20Mhz. See even MVG can
greatly benefit from T-20.
Now for one of the driest and probably most often performed operations
on the ST/Mega is archiving. Be it either ARC or LZH or whatever, this is
a boring and time consuming operation.
How many time have you gotten the LYNX out to play a game while the ST
is doing some hardcore arcing? Ever go to put on a pot of coffee while
your waiting? No more of that with T-20!
Lets look at LZHing with Quester 1.1319 and the amount of time YOU
will be saved from this tedious task.
10 files with an average size of 219672 are to be moved into an ar-
chive. The 8Mhz time is 16 minutes. 20Mhz time is 6 minutes and 47
seconds!!! Savings of *TEN* (10, count 'em, 10) minutes! I could walk
around the block in 10 minutes! To UNLZH these same files with Quester is
4 minutes at 8Mhz and 2minutes at 20Mhz.
ARC 6.02 time for Moving the same files into an arc is 13 minutes and
37 seconds at 8Mhz and 5 minutes and 43 seconds at 20Mhz. A savings of 7.9
minutes! Well, so much for playing that LYNX game.(NOTE: Although the time
for ARCing is faster than the LZHing, the compression ratio for LZH is
much greater.)
That about wraps it up for this installment. Next I will look at the
benefits of T-20 with alternate Desktops, various disk utility programs
and Databaseing. Until then, Speed on the computer dosen't kill, it saves
large amounts of hair from being pulled...
D.HELMS [GEnie]
STARTWO [Delphi- The ST Advantage! Check it out...]
P.S. I am in NO WAY associated with FaST Tech. I receive NO "perks",
special attention or any other enumeration for these articles! I paid FULL
price for my T-20 and have the canceled check to prove it! I am just a
very satisfied user/customer that is willing to share some good news ver-
sus writing a gripe letter when things are wrong and NEVER a good one when
they are right.
<<<<*>>>><<<<*>>>><<<<*>>>>