home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
No Fragments Archive 10: Diskmags
/
nf_archive_10.iso
/
MAGS
/
ST_PLUS
/
STP18.MSA
/
STP_FZONE9.STP
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1997-06-30
|
14KB
|
235 lines
<PICLOAD>FALCON.DAJ
<PICSHOWD>000,000,320,108,000
Falcon Zone #9
If your a regular reader of ST+ you may have noticed a slight chasm in Falcon
zone editorials. The last two issues were without any to be direct and to the
point. I had a bit of a breather to but now I'm back bright eyed and bushy
tailed. Of course now theres been such a gap there must be loads of great
stuff to tell you about. No kidding there is!
Games News
Games wise Bad Mood has had a bit more work on it and now features collision
detection with the walls. Progress is damn slow with this project I know but
to have a full Doom engine for the Falcon would seem sooo brilliant that any
progress at all is joyous. My thoughts on the subject though are a little less
texture mapping and a lot more speed. I could happily do without the skyline,
ceilings and wall textures for the sake of speed. I just want to play Doom and
heretic levels with creatures and decent shooting noises. At the end of the
day thats the important stuff and all the rest is gloss.
On the subject of Doom type games Running is now or soon to be available I'm
told although I only have the early demo version myself. There should be a
shareware version available by the time you read this. Its looking great with
playability being more important than graphical detail. Although its still
visually impressive it doesn't match the graphics of PC type Doom games. They
have taken the route of decent speed instead of wading in treacle which is how
it feels when the frame rate of this type of game gets too slow. Any one ever
tried Doom on a 386SX16?
Perhaps the greatest news of all is what I've read in the latest issue of
Atari Computing. Its called 'Crown of Creation' and its a space game most
likely inspired by Wing Commander. As its not a CD game you won't have to put
up with those annoying FMV bits that the later Wing Commander games force upon
you. AC describe the game as pushing the game to the Falcons limits and then
saying accelerator recommended. If you need a accelerator I would have
thought it had surpassed a Falcons limits. This could be a real downer if the
game doesn't work well with a standard Falcon. Isn't there few enough Falcon
owners already without limiting a game to a small miniority of these. What
ever the case I still want to at least try this game.
Lastly game wise Willies Adventures is a damn fine platform game. I've played
the demo a few times now and although initially impressed with the graphics I
didn't like the gameplay. However after a few more goes it grew on me and I
can honestly say I'm enjoying it now. Its a very professional piece of work
too and as good looking as many games seen on 16bit consoles. It also
surpasses some of the weaker 32bit console platformers. I'm not the greatest
platform fan in the world to be honest with only Nintendos Mario games hitting
the spot for me, so its fair to say that my good opinion of this game must
surely mean real platform fans will love it.
The Internet
I recently finished another one of those free internet trials. Virgin net this
time. Previously I've tried AOL and Netcom. This is using my PC. I had a good
look round for Falcon stuff but to be honest was disappointed with what I
found. There's plenty of Atari stuff on the internet but not much really for
the Falcon. Well it may be that its there but finding it is the problem.
However I had success in finding many other things but Falcon related info was
either out of date or limited. I tried to find news of Crown of Creation but
no joy. There was some Falcon related text in the newsgroups but nothing too
interesting. As for a Atari related chat area, not to my knowledge. I wonder
if I've missed something somewhere as the chat areas with people in always
seem to be Gayclub or teenage love or something. Occasionally I've found a
Macintosh area with some people in but thats as near to Atari computing as I
can get. I might go into it and say something like "Has anyone tried MagicMac?
" but I've learnt the reply will always be something like "Whats that?" which
leads onto finally "The only Atari I've had is an old VCS". As always for me
the Internet is interesting but at the same time highly annoying. The
occasional Internet free trial is enough for me.
BBS's
One thing you'll notice when you use the internet is that finding files and
downloading them can be damn slow. So to all those people who say the BBS is
dead I'd like to point out that I can often download at three times the rate
of the internet from a BBS and select files very quickly (you download the
filelist and make your choices offline). A national call is three times the
cost of a local call at weekends but it still makes financial sense due to the
speed you can sign on and download files. Even allowing for the occasional
upload. More importantly you'll find a greater range of Atari software and
newer titles too. Theres a choice of quite a few Atari BBS's.
Jaguar Tempest Mods
I managed to download these mods from the internet and very good they are too.
Although no substitute for hearing a real Jaguar play them. How about a nice
jaguar quality version of the game for the Falcon. Now that would be nice.
My Atari Computing Letter
A while back I wrote a letter to AC concerning their Syquest/Zip review in the
previous AC magazine. It doesn't seem to have got published so I thought I'd
bung it here. Partly so I could claim to have a letter in my editorial section
if nothing else.
Dear Mr Conner
First of all like so many others I'd just like to say thanks for an excellent
Atari mag. I've been impressed with every issue. A definite improvement on ST
Format.
The main bulk of this letter is to make a couple of suggestions and then
one complaint.
How about an Atari Computing CDROM. Now I'm not expecting you to give it away
with a single issue. But I'd like to see a CDROM at a subsidised price like £5
perhaps every year or 6 months. It would contain lots of Demo versions of the
latest commercial software. HTML files for people without access to the
internet. Mods, PD, shareware etc. While I realise lots of people don't have a
CDROM connected to their Atari. Anyone with access to a PC could still use it
and copy the stuff they want onto floppies for use with their Atari. It could
also contain price lists and PD cats from many companies. It would certainly
be worth finding out how interested AC readers are.
My other suggestion is with regards Computer Shopper. As far as I know its the
only newstand magazine with any Atari coverage left. Maurice Collins does a
page or two every month (mcollins@dial.pipex.com) how about pestering him to
get some Atari software on the Computer Shopper CD Coverdisk. They have had
Archimedes software on it. They've often left the CD empty anyway by 100 MEG
or so. Even 4 MEG of that would be ample reason for Atari users to pick up a
copy and increase CS's circulation. If Atari Computing supplied this software
it could be a source of valuable free advertising.
Lastly my complaint. Its fair to say that I wasn't that impressed with the
'Come Fly With Me' article. I know your reply if any to this will be defensive
but I feel the article is inaccurate, incomplete and comes to the wrong
conclusions in some places. I can't really comment fairly on the speed
comparisons as I don't have a EZFlyer or Zip drive but I've read PC, Mac,
Amiga and Acorn mags and every one without exception puts the Syquest drives
as considerably faster than the Zip drive. Perhaps the Zip drive has been
improved in some way but normally the Zip transfers at about 800k per second
and the Syquest at least double that. I realise it may be the Atari has a slow
interface and is therefore a bottleneck on performance making them all seem
the same in which case there is no speed increase unless the drives are used
on a faster computer later. However my 32MHZ Falcon has achieved a 2MEG per
second transfer rate with my EZ135 and therefore if the Falcon was used as
stated I'm struggling to see that as the reason. I hope the comparison was
fair in that all cartridges were empty and freshly formatted and the EZ135
wasn't already half full and fragmented. Remember hard drives slow down as
they get full and especially if the files are sliced up due to fragmentation.
Anyway leaving the speed comparisons a side the Zip drive is meant to be the
least reliable of the drives mentioned where as the article refers to the
EZ135 as less reliable. This may be due to the reviewers own personal
experience but its true to say the EZ135 is tried and trusted technology using
a simple single head and single sided platter. The Zip drive is new technology
using a high density floppy disk with a heat controlled head. I certainly
know of someone who has had trouble with his Zip drive and he is the only
person I know who actually has a Zip. He had to send it back to Germany and
they sent back a new replacement. Having to constantly monitor and change the
heat of the head is pretty damn sophisticated but will devices be reliable
over the long term. Heat then cold constantly surely has some effect on the
material the head is made of.I have also read of Zip problems in the industry
overall. I don't think there's any question that Syquests are regarded as more
reliable generally.
The EZ135 also has the benefit of being bootable, a fully standard SCSI port
with full range ID settings. It provides terminator power for a SCSI
interface. Can be formatted with standard SCSI driver software as was mine
with my Falcon software. The cartridge prices tend to be about £2 more but
provide about 30MEG more storage. So are as cheap if not cheaper. The Zip
isn't bootable, doesn't provide terminator power, has non standard SCSI
connections and isn't seen as a normal SCSI device by a lot of SCSI software,
is slower with less storage and is actually less reliable I struggle to see
how its actually superior. Admittingly the EZ135 is now superceded, has that
stupid short power cable, naff eject mechanism (not sure if its unreliable
though) and instructions which are practically non existent. plus of course
Syquest have financial problems back in America.
Anyway I feel the whole review had a downer on the EZ135 giving it a rating of
75% and giving the vastly inferior Zip 81%.
Why wasn't it mentioned that the Zip couldn't be used to boot the whole
computer and that as a single device it couldn 't be used with a host adaptor
without some sort of power adaptor? Isn't it true to say that the EZ135 is far
easier to use with an Atari especially a STFM/E with a host adaptor? If the
Zip has been modified to get around any of its normal problems like terminator
power etc surely this should have been mentioned.
Also the comparison that an EZFlyer costs the same as a Zip plus a Gigs worth
of cartridges is hardly the point. Online storage is the important bit. You
can get bulk floppies for as low as 12p each. Working out at £12 for 200MEG
unformatted capacity however I'd still prefer that 200MEG to actually all be
available to me straight away and not swopping disks all the time.
I'd just like to finally say that before I bought my EZ135 last summer I'd
read about a dozen reviews comparing it with the Zip and almost everyone had
the EZ135 as superior.
******************************************************************************
Well thats about it for this month. Why not write a letter to the address
below. Always after contacts for swopping software. Mods, screens, latest PD
etc.
&&&&&&&&L¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯|yyyr[&&&&My
&&&&&&&&L [&&&L[&&&&&&&
&&&&&&&&L [&&&L[&&&&&&&&L
&&&&&&&&L ``` [&&&&&&&&L
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&L
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&L
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&L
,-&&&&&###&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&L
." &&&&LP [LL &&&&L
Z &&&&P"vaa"Lt Write To: &&&&L
t" #&W" ," &&&&L
x ".#" x' Martin Wilson &&&&L
g j< .< 32 Grass Royal &&&&L
& = & Yeovil, BA21 4JW &&&&L
& & &&&&L
& `######g####################L
& #F9c.g# f
& ymy[&2m [
[ L Cr 't
[ a" ^9`
[ r"" j"
[ L .,w