home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Online Bible 1995 March
/
ROM-1025.iso
/
olb
/
biblefre
/
topics09
/
t09150
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-06-14
|
42KB
|
793 lines
09150
next 09151
09151
Les Thèmes de B.W. Johnson sont en cours de traduction
et seront disponibles en Septembre. Un module en anglais
- People NT Notes & Topics - est désormais disponible.
Il s'agit de brefs commentaires sur chaque verset du Nouveau
Testament, commentaires qui peuvent être consultés à partir du
texte biblique, ainsi que les thèmes qui suivent. Ecrivez-nous
aux Editions Clé pour plus de renseignements.
INDEX to Introductions by B. W. Johnson
Matthew 9152
Mark 9153
Luke 9154
John 9155
Acts 9156
Outline 9157
Chronology 9158
Life of Paul 9159
Chronology 9160
Order of the Epistles 9161
Romans 9201
1 Corinthians 9202
2 Corinthians 9203
Galatians 9204
Ephesians 9205
Philippians 9206
Colossians 9207
1 Thessalonians 9208
2 Thessalonians 9209
1 Timothy 9251
2 Timothy 9252
Titus 9253
Philemon 9254
Hebrews 9255
James 9256
1 Peter 9257
2 Peter 9258
1 John 9259
2 John 9260
3 John 9261
Jude 9262
Revelation 9301
INDEX to Notes on Revelation 9651
INDEX to Additional Notes for TPNT 9851
09152
INTRODUCTION TO MATTHEW by B. W. Johnson
The first of the Gospels has been assigned by the Church,
from the earliest times, to Matthew, one of the Twelve Apostles,
and in all ages has been given the first place in the NT. He
was the son of Alphaeus, as we learn from Luke, who also calls
him Levi.
# Lu 5:27-29
He calls himself "Matthew the tax collector,"
# Mt 10:3
refusing to conceal in his own history the despised calling that
had engaged him before he entered the service of Christ. He was
a Jew, but had so far lost the national feeling that he was a
collector of the hateful Roman tribute at Capernaum, and was
sitting at the receipt of custom when called by our Lord to
leave all and to follow him. His history of the Saviour shows,
however, that he was more dominated by Jewish ideas than the
writers of the other three gospels. Of the life of Matthew,
after the death of the Saviour, we have no information, for no
reliance can be placed upon the traditions concerning his later
history.
The Gospel of Matthew shows the methodical habits of a
business man, for of all the writers he is most systematic in
his arrangement. He gives by far the fullest accounts of the
Sermon on the Mount, the charge to the Apostles (Mt 10), the
Discourse on Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, the Arraignment
of the Scribes and Pharisees, of the Parables, and of the
Prophecies concerning the Overthrow of the Jewish State. It has
always been held that Matthew wrote before the other NT writers,
and wrote especially for Jewish Christians. It is therefore
supposed that he wrote first either in the common language of
Judea at that time, the Aramaic, which was spoken by the Saviour
and his Apostles, or else in the pure Hebrew, which was then
generally understood. This, however, is an unsettled question,
and the Greek which we now possess, was, it is almost certain,
written in Matthew's lifetime. There are no data for determining
the exact time and place where it was written, but it was
probably composed about the middle of the first century, within
twenty years of the crucifixion.
Whether written originally in Hebrew or not, it can hardly be
doubted that Matthew wrote for Jewish readers. He takes for
granted a familiarity with Jewish customs, laws, and localities,
to a far greater extent than the other writers. Dean Alford
says: "The whole narrative proceeds more upon a Jewish view of
matters, and is concerned more to establish that point, which to
a Jewish convert would be most important, namely, that Jesus is
the Messiah prophesied in the OT. Hence the commencement of his
genealogy from Abraham and David; hence the frequent notice of
the necessity of this or that event happening, because it was
foretold by the prophets; hence the constant opposition of our
Lord's spiritually ethical teaching to the carnal formalistic
ethics of the Scribes and Pharisees."
from B. W. Johnson's \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. (p. 17)
09153
INTRODUCTION TO MARK by B. W. Johnson
The Second Gospel was written by Mark, the kinsman of
Barnabas, and the companion of Paul in his first missionary
journey. When and where it was written is uncertain. Of its
author the following facts are gathered from the NT: He is first
named in
# Ac 12:12
His mother's name was Mary, and we learn from
# Col 4:10
that she was a sister of Barnabas. She dwelt in Jerusalem, and
this city was probably Mark's early home. He was converted by
Peter,
# 1Pe 5:13
it has been supposed, at the great ingathering on the day of
Pentecost. He became a minister,
# Ac 12:25
attended Paul and Barnabas on their first missionary journey,
did not prove satisfactory to Paul,
# Ac 15:38
and as Barnabas insisted on taking him, he and Paul parted
company on the second missionary journey. That Paul and Mark
were afterwards intimate is shown by the subsequent history. We
find him by Paul's side during his first imprisonment at Rome,
A.D. 61-63; and he is acknowledged by him as one of his few
fellow-labourers who had been a "comfort" to him during the weary
hours of his imprisonment.
# Col 4:10,11 Phm 1:24
We next have traces of him in
# 1Pe 5:13
"The [church that is] at Babylon . . . greeteth you; and so
[doth] Mark my son." From this we infer that he joined the
spiritual father, the friend of his mother, at Babylon, then and
for some hundred years afterwards returned one of the chief
seats of Jewish culture. From Babylon he would seem to have
returned to Asia Minor; for during his second imprisonment, A.D.
68, Paul, writing to Timothy, charges him to bring Mark with him
to Rome, on the ground that he was "profitable to me for the
ministry."
# 2Ti 4:11
From this point we gain no further information from the NT
respecting the Evangelist. It is most probable, however, that he
did join the Apostle at Rome, whither also Peter would seem to
have proceeded, and suffered martyrdom along with Paul. After
the death of these two great pillars of the Church,
ecclesiastical tradition affirms that Mark visited Egypt,
founded the Church of Alexandria, and died by martyrdom. This
tradition is, however, very uncertain.
Mark was not one of the twelve, and there is no reason to
believe that he was an eye and ear witness of the events which
he has recorded; but an almost unanimous testimony of the early
fathers indicates Peter as the source of his information. The
most important of these testimonies is that of Papias, who says,
"He, the presbyter (John) said: Mark, being the interpreter of
Peter, wrote exactly whatever he remembered; but he did not
write in order the things which were spoken or done by Christ.
For he was neither a hearer nor a follower of the Lord, but, as
I said, afterward followed Peter, who made his discourses to
suit what was required, without the view of giving a connected
digest of the discourses of our Lord. Mark, therefore, made no
mistakes when he wrote down the circumstances as he recollected
them; for he was very careful of one thing, to omit nothing of
what he heard, and to say nothing false in what he related."
Thus Papias writes of Mark. This testimony is confirmed by other
witnesses.
Tradition affirms that Mark wrote for the benefit of Gentile
Christians, and this view is confirmed by the fact that he often
explains Jewish customs, where Matthew, writing for Jews, omits
the explanation as if well understood. In the comments on Mark
references will be found to the parallel passages in Matthew,
where full explanatory notes will be found.
from B. W. Johnson's \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. (p. 163)
09154
INTRODUCTION TO LUKE by B. W. Johnson
The Third Gospel is assigned by the common voice of the
primitive Church to Luke, "the beloved physician," and companion
of Paul. Of his earlier history nothing is recorded. There is no
proof that he ever saw the Lord or that he became a believer
until some time after his death. He was not a Jew, his name is
Greek, his style and modes of thought point to Greek training,
and it has been generally believed that he was one of "the
Grecians who turned to the Lord" in the great commercial city of
Antioch, where the first Gentile church beyond Palestine was
founded. From the incidental references to himself in the Acts
we learn that he was the constant companion of the later
ministry of the great apostle to the Gentiles, and this
confirmed by the allusions to him in the Epistles. We learn that
he was a Gentile, a physician, that he remained with Paul in his
imprisonment at Caesarea and attended him to Rome, where he was
his companion during his long sufferings.
# Col 4:14 Phm 1:24 2Ti 4:11
The Gospel of Luke differs from the other three in its
sources of information. Matthew wrote as an eye witness; Mark
probably recalled the recollections of Peter; John recalled his
own personal memories of the life and words of the Lord, but
Luke draws from the authentic sources of information then
accessible, and he carefully presents the results in an orderly
narrative. There are reasons for believing that during the
period when Paul was a prisoner at Caesarea, Luke, under his
direction, set in order the facts of the Life of Christ in order
to furnish an account fitted for the use of Gentile converts,
and Gentiles who desired to learn of the Lord. "As Paul was the
apostle, so in a faint degree Gentile Luke was the evangelist,
of the Gentiles. He traces the genealogy up, not merely to
Abraham, but Adam, the son of God. He makes Christ's first
teachings at Nazareth commemorate the extension of God's mercy
beyond the limits of Israel.
# Lu 4:16-30
He shows how the sinner is forgiven upon condition of obedient
faith.
# Lu 7:36-50
The publican is, in Paul's favourite term, 'justified.' Evidently
their narrative of the Lord's supper is the same tradition."
# Lu 24:34 1Co 15:5
Luke's two books, his Gospels and the Acts, are properly two
successive parts of one Christian history; and as the latter
terminates at the point where Paul has lived two years at Rome,
in the year 64, so the Gospel must have been written before that
period, namely during the 27 years after Christ's death. For as
Luke terminates his Acts abruptly with the close of Paul's two
years' imprisonment, without adding a syllable of that apostle's
later history, it is very certain that the Acts was published at
that time. Yet, we know from the preface to Acts that the Gospel
had been already written. Thus, it is evident, that it was
written 27 years after the crucifixion.
from B. W. Johnson's \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. (p. 221)
09155
INTRODUCTION TO THE GOSPEL OF JOHN by B. W. Johnson
THE AUTHOR of the Fourth Gospel was John, the son of Zebedee
and Salome, the brother of James, in early life a Galilean
fisherman, but afterwards an apostle of Jesus Christ. In less
than a hundred years after his death Christian writers living in
different quarters of the world, whose writings are still
extant, show us that this was the universal belief of the
church. Indeed, the testimony to the authorship is stronger than
can be furnished that Josephus wrote his Jewish history, that
Caesar wrote his Commentaries, or in behalf of any uninspired
writing of antiquity, and would never had been questioned had
not a class of rationalistic critics arisen who wished to set
aside the lofty views of the personality and mission of the
Saviour which are so prominent a feature of the Fourth Gospel. We
know that it was written by an eye-witness and by a beloved
disciple.
# Joh 21:24
There were only three disciples who were admitted to the most
intimate relations with Jesus--Peter, James and John. As it was
not written by either of the first two, John must be the author.
So the early church unanimously testifies. Irenaeus, who learned
of one who had been intimate with John and who wrote near the
middle of the second century, affirms that he was the author. It
is credited to John in the canon of Muratori, the first
catalogue of the NT writings, written A.D. 175. It is also
spoken of by Theophilus of Antioch A.D. 175, and by Clement of
Alexandria, near the same time, and in the latter part of the
second century it was translated into the Syriac and Latin
versions of the NT. Besides these direct recognitions there are
evident allusions to it and quotations from it in a number of
epistles and treatises of Ignatius, Hermas, Polycarp, Papias,
and others, which belong to the first half of the second
century. Indeed, it is quoted within twenty years of John's
death.
PLACE AND TIME. We do not know certainly when or where the
Fourth Gospel was written. Irenaeus, who lived in the second
century, and who was the religious pupil of Polycarp, the martyr
who was educated at the feet of John, declares that it was
written at Ephesus, after the other three had been written. Its
internal character indicates that it was written outside of
Judea, after the fall of the temple, and after certain heresies
began to be developed. John was still at Jerusalem A.D. 50;
# Ga 2:9
it is almost certain that he did not go to Ephesus until after
the death of Paul, about A.D. 67, and it is probable that he did
not leave the city of Jerusalem, permanently, until the storm of
destruction began to gather, which broke in A.D. 70. As the
testimony of the early church is unanimous that his later years
were passed at Ephesus and in that region, he probably went
there about this date. After this, and before his death, which
took place near the close of the century, the Gospel was
written.
JOHN, the author, was brought up to his father's calling, and
even followed it after he was first pointed to Christ. While he
was an "unlearned man,"
# Ac 4:13
in the sense that he never attended the rabbinical schools, he
had such an education in Hebrew and in the Scriptures as all
respectable Jewish families were wont to give their children. In
connection with every synagogue was a school in which children
were taught reading, writing, and the rudiments of science. The
children of Jewish common people were better educated than those
of any other country in the world. Jesus found John among the
disciples of John the Baptist, who at once pointed him and his
companions to Christ. We next meet him at the sea of Galilee,
fishing, and there Jesus gave him a permanent call. From this
time onward he steadfastly followed the Master, and with James
and Peter, formed an inner circle nearer the Lord. These three,
only, witness the resurrection of Jairus' daughter, see the
glory of the transfiguration, and the agony of he garden. John
and Peter follow Christ, after his arrest, and the first goes
openly into the house of Caiaphas, to the trial before Pilate,
and to the cross, till all was over. When the news of the
resurrection came he and Peter were the first to reach the
sepulchre. To him Jesus committed the care of his own mother,
while dying on the cross, and it is probable that he remained in
Judea to attend to this sacred charge while she lived. From
about the time of the overthrow of Jerusalem he changed his
residence to Ephesus, where he probably lived until he died,
near the close of the first century. The testimony of the early
church would place his death after A.D. 98. It was during this
later period that he wrote his Gospel, his Epistles, was exiled
to Patmos, and there wrote his Revelation.
THE CHARACTER of John's Gospel, written after his fellow
apostles had gone to rest, differs in some respects from the
others. It alone follows the chronological order of events,
gives an account of the Judean ministry of our Lord, shows that
his ministry lasted for over three years, gives the account of
the resurrection of Lazarus and of the wonderful discourse to
the disciples the night that he was betrayed. It omits much with
which the church was already familiar through the other Gospels,
presents much that they had not recorded, and recognizes certain
false doctrines which had begun to be taught. It is the gospel
of the Incarnation, of Love, and the most Spiritual of the
Gospels. It alone unfolds fully the great doctrine of the
Comforter. The great end, however, that the writer had before
him in all he wrote is given in his own words: "These are
written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son
of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name."
# Joh 20:31
from B. W. Johnson's \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. (pp. 322-323)
09156
INTRODUCTION TO THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES by B. W. Johnson
THE OBJECT.--The fifth book of the NT begins where the first
four end. These have recorded the life, words and acts of our
Saviour from his birth to the Cross, the tomb, the resurrection,
and the Great Commission. They leave the apostles and the
nucleus of the apostolic church waiting in Jerusalem for the
promise of the Father which they must receive in order to endue
them with power from on high needed for the work of preaching
the Gospel of the Risen Lord. The historian of Acts begins with
the Ascension, then portrays to us the waiting and praying
disciples, ready to begin the great work as soon as they shall
receive the promised baptism of the Holy Spirit. Then when the
signal was given that all things were ready by the descent of
the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost, he enters upon the
record of how the apostles and apostolic men preached the gospel
under the Saviour's commission, how sinners were made saints, how
the church was founded, and how it was built up, nurtured and
trained by the apostles. Acts is the history of apostolic
evangelization, the book of conversions, the first book of
ecclesiastical history.
It has been forcibly stated by Dean Howson that Luke
declares in his preface that he had in his former treatise (the
Gospel) given account "of all that Jesus began both to do and to
teach, until the day in which he was taken up," while in Acts,
he "reveals to the world what the same Jesus, having ascended
into heaven, and being exalted to the right hand of God,
continues 'to do and to teach,' not any longer within the narrow
confines of Palestine, or during the few years of an earthly
ministry, but from his royal throne in his imperial city, the
heavenly Jerusalem; and what, there sitting in glory, he does
and teaches, by the instrumentality of apostles, apostolic men,
and apostolic churches, in all ages of the world; and what he
will ever continue to do and to teach from heaven, by the power
of the Holy Spirit sent down from heaven after his ascension,
even till he comes again in glory to judge both quick and dead."
This view of the purpose of Acts is not to exalted, as will
be seen, when we bear in mind that the apostles were forbidden
to begin their work until endowed by the Holy Spirit which was
"shed forth" by the Lord from his throne on high, and then,
"spake as the Spirit gave them utterance," acting in all things
under the immediate guidance of the Spirit. Thus, they became
simply the agents of the Lord, led, directed, preaching and
speaking as they were directed from on high. All that the Lord
continued "to do and to teach" thus through them has been
recorded as examples to his followers in all times, from which
they cannot lightly depart without disloyalty to the King.
THE AUTHOR.--The preface shows that it was written by the
same author as the third Gospel, which has been ascribed by the
church in all ages to Luke, and in the first canon of the NT
Scriptures he is named as the author. Eusebius places it as
Luke's among those books that were NEVER disputed in the church,
and it is quoted by the earliest Christian writers, such as
Polycarp, who was a companion of the apostle John. It is also
attributed to Luke by Irenaeus in the second century, a hearer
of Polycarp, who was a hearer of John. We learn from Acts itself
that it was written by a companion of Paul, and one who attended
him to Rome. His Epistles inform us that Luke was an attendant
upon his imprisonment in that city.
TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING.--Acts could not have been
completed before the year A.D. 63, as it is continued at the
time at which Paul had closed his second year of imprisonment at
Rome, which is placed in that year, and it must have been
completed before the year 68, as it makes no mention of his
death, which did not occur later than that year. The closing
chapters were no doubt written in Rome, as Luke was there in
attendance upon Paul,
# Col 4:14
but it is probable that the greater portion might have been
written during the two years' imprisonment of Paul in Caesarea
under the immediate direction of the great apostle. While the
two years of Paul at Rome were busied with epistles to the
churches, and preaching the gospel in Rome, the records are
silent how his time was occupied while confined at Caesarea. It
would be impossible for such a man as Paul to be idle, and as
his friend had full access to him, there is strong reason to
believe that at this period Luke, his constant companion, under
his direction, not only prepared his Gospel, but by the aid of
such men as Philip the Evangelist, who had his home in Caesarea,
and Cornelius, the first Gentile convert, aided by the records
preserved in the church at Jerusalem, prepared the history of
Acts to the period of the departure to Rome. From the apostles
themselves, no doubt, were obtained the accounts of the
ascension, the preaching and founding of the church on the day
of Pentecost, the acts of Peter, the dispute between the
Hellenists and the Hebrews, the martyrdom of Stephen and of the
Apostle James. And there was also the information which he could
obtain from the Church of Caesarea; in that city he met with
Philip the Evangelist,
# Ac 21:8
and perhaps also with Cornelius, the devout centurion. From
this source he would derive his information concerning the
evangelistic labours in Samaria, the conversion of the Ethiopian
eunuch, the visions made to Peter and Cornelius, and the
particulars connected with the death of Herod Agrippa. That
portion of the history in which Paul is the principal figure
would require no other source of information than the great
apostle could furnish himself.
from B. W. Johnson's \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. (pp. 413-414)
09157
THE OUTLINE OF ACTS by B. W. Johnson
I. Preaching the Gospel "in Jerusalem" and Judea
1. Preparation for the work
# Ac 1:1-26
2. Events of Pentecost
# Ac 2:1-47
3. The Church unfolding in miracle and endurance of
persecution
# Ac 3:1-4:37
4. The Church unfolding in penal power
# Ac 5:1-16
5. The Church in the second persecution
# Ac 5:17-42
6. The Church forming its economy
# Ac 6:1-8
7. The Church in last struggle and dispersion
# Ac 6:8-8:4
II. Preaching the Gospel "in Samaria" and about Palestine
1. The deacon Philip evangelizes Samaria
# Ac 8:5-25
2. The new Apostle of the Gentiles called
# Ac 9:1-30
3. Gentile induction; new Christian centre, Gentile
Antioch
# Ac 10:1-11:30
4. Desolation of Jerusalem Church by Herod; its avenging
# Ac 12:1-25
III. Preaching the Gospel "in the Uttermost Parts of the Earth"
1. Paul's first mission from Antioch
# Ac 13:1-14:28
2. Jerusalem Council on Circumcision
# Ac 15:1-34
3. Paul's second mission from Antioch
# Ac 15:35-18:23
4. Paul's third mission from Antioch
# Ac 18:23-21:17
5. Paul in council with James--Arrest--Sent to Caesarea
# Ac 21:18-23:35
6. Paul's two years at Caesarea
# Ac 24:1-26:32
7. Paul en route for Rome; at Rome
# Ac 27:1-28:31
from B. W. Johnson's \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. (p. 414)
09158
THE CHRONOLOGY OF ACTS by B. W. Johnson
In the main I have followed that of Dean Howson. The dates
for the period after Paul's labours began are reasonably certain,
and most critics are substantially agreed. Those of the period
from the Ascension to the time when Paul began his labours at
Antioch are somewhat uncertain. The Ascension and the founding
of the Church on Pentecost must, I think he placed as early as
A.D. 30, and this gives a longer interval for the events
recorded in the first eleven chapters of Acts. As modified
the following are outlines:
A.D. 30. The Resurrection, the Ascension, the Gospel First
Preached on Pentecost, Holy Spirit Sent, the Church
Founded, and the Events Embraced from Acts 1 to 6:8.
A.D. 37. Conversion of Paul of Tarsus. Acts 9:1-19.
A.D. 38-40. Period of Paul's Retirement in Arabia
A.D. 41-43. The Labours of Peter and the Conversion of the
Gentiles Recorded in Chapters 9-11.
A.D. 44. Martyrdom of James, and Death of Herod. Acts 12.
A.D. 45-47. Paul's First Missionary Journey. Acts 13-14.
A.D. 49 or 50. Council at Jerusalem. Acts 15.
A.D. 51-53. Paul on His Second Missionary Journey. Acts
15-18.
A.D. 54-56. Paul at Ephesus, nearly three years. Acts 19.
A.D. 57. Paul a Second Time at Corinth.
A.D. 58. Paul Goes to Jerusalem, is seized, Imprisoned. Acts
20-23.
A.D. 59-60. Paul Imprisoned at Caesarea. His Defense before
Festus and Agrippa. Acts 23-26.
A.D. 61. Paul sent to Rome. Shipwrecked. Acts 27-28.
A.D. 62. Imprisoned at Rome. The End of Acts.
To this I may add that there is reason to believe that Paul
was acquitted and released in A.D. 63, preached in Spain, Greece
and Asia, until A.D. 67 or 68, was again seized in Nicopolis in
Epirus, taken to Rome a second time, and put to death in A.D.
68.
from B. W. Johnson's \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. (pp. 415)
09159
A BRIEF SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF PAUL
by B. W. Johnson
Much more than half of the Scriptural text in this volume is
from the pen of Paul the Apostle, the great Evangelist of the
Gentile world, and it is fitting that a brief view of the life
and work of one who fills so large a space in the sacred record
should be given as a general introduction to the thirteen
Pauline Epistles.
The diligent student of Acts of the Apostles is already
acquainted with the sources of most of his public history. The
statements in the Epistles from his own pen furnish almost all
the remaining data which we possess. Had the great men of God,
who set to work the forces which wrought the religious
revolution of the world, suspected how great a place they were
to fill in history, and how eager future ages would be to learn
the details of their lives and the trials of their work, perhaps
they would have left on record something more than the meagre
hints which are all that we possess.
We are informed concerning the place of the birth of Saul of
Tarsus, and of his tribe and religious training, but we do not
know the date of his birth. As he was a "young man" at the time
of the death of Stephen, but old enough to have an official
position, he must have been between thirty and forty years old.
Hence, it is held that he could not have been born earlier than
A.D. 7. Tarsus, the place of his birth, is situated a short
distance from the bay of Cilicia, on the river Cyndus, within
plain view of the snow-covered heights of the Cilician Towers.
The city was capital of a province, a "free city," a centre of
Greek culture only less renowned at that period than Athens and
Alexandria, was the seat of a considerable Jewish colony and of
a synagogue. The father of Saul had in some unexplained way,
either by purchase, inheritance, or by his services, secured
the Roman citizenship, so that Paul was a Roman, "free born."
The family belonged to the Tribe of Benjamin, which probably
explains why the son received the name of the Benjaminite king,
were Pharisees of the strictest type, and the son was trained in
the rigid notions and practices of that sect.
His education was completed, as the son of orthodox and
prosperous Hebrews should have been, at Jerusalem. At what time
the young Saul went to the Holy City of his race, whether he had
returned a second time when we first meet with him on the death
of Stephen, or whether he had in Tarsus taken a course in
Grecian literature, are matters of pure conjecture. The facts
known are that he had a thorough knowledge of the Greek, that he
quoted the Greek poets with the familiarity and correctness of a
cultured Greek, that he showed an intimate acquaintance with
Greek philosophy, and that he entered the school of the renowned
Gamaliel, the grandson of Hillel, and was "brought up at his
feet." This language, compared with what he know of the custom
of the Rabbinical schools, implies that he must have spent three
or four years, at least, under the great Master of the Law in
Jerusalem.
It is in the persecution which began with the death of
Stephen that he first appears in history. In some respects there
is a complete contrast between Saul of Tarsus and Paul the
Apostle. One is the unconverted Jew, the other is the
consecrated Christian. The first is a deadly enemy of Christ and
of Christianity, a pitiless and tireless persecutor, but at the
same time a devout, conscientious, but mistaken man. His hatred
of Christians was due to the fact that he believed them enemies
of God and of religion. Blinded by his unquestioning zeal for
Judaism, for the time a bigot filled with rage, he spread havoc
among the saints and became the terror of the church.
"Consenting to the death of Stephen," whatever that may mean,
acting as the accomplice of those who stoned him, seizing and
imprisoning others, at last he was sent with the commission of
the Sanhedrin to stop the progress of the new faith in the great
city of Damascus. On the way, near the city, the persecutor
underwent a wonderful transformation.
Three accounts have been given of this remarkable change; two
by Paul himself, and one by the historian of Acts. The essential
facts are that the Lord himself appeared to the conscientious
but mistaken zealot, that the honest persecutor surrendered as
soon as he saw his mistake, that the Lord appeared to him that
he might be a WITNESS, and at once called him to an apostleship
as the missionary to the Gentile world. He was led blind into
Damascus, received his sight after three days, and was baptized
by a disciple, and shortly after began his work. After spending
a considerable period in Arabia,
# Ga 1:17
possibly in study and preparation for his great mission, he
returned to Damascus, where he at once experienced the
bitterness of persecution,
# 2Co 11:32
but escaped to Jerusalem, where he found himself an object of
suspicion to the church on account of his former persecuting
fame. Vouched for by Barnabas, he met Peter,
# Ga 1:18
but tarried only fifteen days, and then departed to Tarsus to
escape the plots of the infuriated Jews. There is silence
concerning several years of his history, but he was evidently
not idle, and the "churches of Cilicia," spoken of soon after,
were, no doubt, planted at this time. After this interval, at
the request of his old friend Barnabas, he returned to Antioch,
to enter upon the career of missionary activity which
distinguished the rest of his life.
The historian Luke names three great missionary tours in
which he was engaged. About A.D. 45, he and Barnabas were set
apart by the church at Antioch, under the direction of the Holy
Spirit, and at once set out. During this tour he travelled the
island of Cyprus its entire length, planting churches, and then
landed at Perga on the mainland, a city of Asia Minor, where
they were deserted by John Mark, who had hitherto accompanied
them. Labouring at Antioch in Pisidia, Lystra, Derbe, Iconium,
with great success, they stirred up the enmity of the Jews, and
these tireless enemies stirred up the populace at Lystra, so
that Paul was stoned until supposed to be dead. Returning, they
visited the churches planted, and finally returned to Antioch.
Next, about A.D. 50, Paul and Barnabas attended the council
at Jerusalem, brought about by the efforts of Judaizing teachers
to compel Gentile converts to accept Judaism. Of this conflict
we fill find many traces in the Epistles of Paul. The next year,
without Barnabas, attended by Silas, and a part of the time by
other companions, he started on his second missionary journey,
visiting churches previously founded in Syria and Cilicia, and
planting new ones in Phrygia and Galatia. At Troas, on the coast
of the Aegean Sea, at the call of a heavenly vision, the
missionaries crossed over into Europe, and planted their first
church on European soil at Philippi, "a chief city of
Macedonia," where they also were scourged and imprisoned, but
honourably discharged when the magistrates found out they were
Roman citizens. Then churches were planted at Thessalonica,
Berea, Athens, and at the great commercial metropolis of
Corinth, where Paul remained at this time for a year and a half.
In the year 54, probably, Paul returned to Antioch, by way of
Ephesus, Caesarea and Jerusalem.
The same year the great Apostle began his third missionary
journey. Starting from Antioch he went to Ephesus, which he had
before visited. He now remained about three years and planted a
great church in the metropolis of western Asia. At last, on
account of the disturbance caused by Demetrius and his fellow-
craftsmen, he left and continued his journey to Macedonia and to
Corinth. From thence he started in the following spring to
Jerusalem, meeting the elders of the Ephesian church at Miletus.
Arriving in Jerusalem, he was assaulted in the temple by a mob,
rescued by a Roman officer, removed to Caesarea, where he was
imprisoned for two years, and where he appealed to Caesar, as a
Roman had a right to do. It was on the way to Rome that he was
shipwrecked on the Island of Malta and remained three months. In
the spring of A.D. 61, he landed at Puteoli, in Italy, and from
thence proceeded to Rome. Here we have a view of him for two
years as a military prisoner, in his own hired house, engaged in
teaching, and there the history of Acts leaves him. There is
good reason for believing that he was released in A.D. 63,
visited Antioch, Ephesus, Nicopolis, and possibly Philippi,
Corinth and Spain. It was after this release that the Pastoral
Epistles were written, the last, Second Timothy, being written
after he had again been confined at Rome and shortly before his
death. It was somewhere about A.D. 66-68 that his busy career
ended, and that he received the crown of martyrdom in Rome.
The details I have given are enough to show how laborious,
and how full of suffering was his eventful life. Yet we know
that the history of Acts only touches upon his hardships,
sufferings and sacrifices. Compelled, in his Second Letter to
the church at Corinth, in self-defense, he speaks of his labours.
# 2Co 11:23-27
The world had never before seen an example of one who gave up
so much, voluntarily accepted such trials and sorrows, and so
consecrated himself to a work in behalf of mankind. The
transformation of Saul of Tarsus the Persecutor, into Paul the
Apostle, is a miracle not less wonderful than the resurrection
of the Lord. Dr. Baur, the most learned of German rationalists,
confessed at the end of his life, that no rational explanation
can be given of the transformation of Paul from "a most vehement
adversary into the most resolute herald of Christianity," and
that he felt constrained to call it a miracle.
from B. W. Johnson's \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. (pp. 7-9)
09160
CHRONOLOGY OF THE LIFE OF PAUL
by B. W. Johnson
Some of the dates in the life of Paul can be fixed with
certainty, and others are only approximate. The following are
accepted by the best authorities.
Conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.D. 37
First visit to Jerusalem after conversion . . . . A.D. 40
Second visit to Jerusalem . . . . . . . . . . . . A.D. 44
Beginning of first missionary journey . . . . . . A.D. 45
Council at Jerusalem (third visit) . . . . . . . A.D. 50
Second missionary journey begun . . . . . . . . . A.D. 51
Fourth visit to Jerusalem . . . . . . . . . . . . A.D. 54
Third missionary journey begun . . . . . . . . . A.D. 54
Fifth and last visit to Jerusalem . . . . . . . . A.D. 58
Imprisonment at Caesarea . . . . . . . . . . . . A.D. 58-60
Voyage to Rome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.D. 60-61
First imprisonment in Rome . . . . . . . . . . . A.D. 61-63
Release from imprisonment . . . . . . . . . . . . A.D. 63
Second imprisonment. Date uncertain, from . . . . A.D. 65 to 67
Martyrdom. Date uncertain, from . . . . . . . . . A.D. 65 to 68
from B. W. Johnson. \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. Pp. 9-10.
09161
ORDER OF THE PAULINE EPISTLES
by B. W. Johnson
The Epistles of Paul are not arranged in the NT in the order
in which they were written. The following table gives their
chronological order, and the approximate date at which each was
written. I give the general results reached by scholars, but
omit the reasons from lack of space:
1 Thessalonians Written at Corinth . . Between A.D. 52 and 54
2 Thessalonians Written at Corinth . . Between A.D. 52 and 54
Galatians Written probably at Ephesus,
or in Macedonia A.D. 56 or 57
1 Corinthians Written probably at Ephesus A.D. 57
2 Corinthians Written in Macedonia A.D. 57
Romans Written at Corinth A.D. 58
Colossians Written at Rome A.D. 62
Ephesians Written at Rome A.D. 62
Philemon Written at Rome A.D. 62
Philippians Written at Rome A.D. 62
Hebrews Written in Italy, probably Rome A.D. 65
1 Timothy Written probably in Macedonia A.D. 66-67
Titus Written probably in Macedonia A.D. 66-67
2 Timothy Written in his prison at Rome A.D. 66-68
These were all written in the Greek language, the common
language of the educated world in the first century, and indeed
the language of church literature for three centuries. Its
general diffusion all over the East enables Christians
everywhere to read and understand writings in that tongue. Paul
was no doubt acquainted with it from childhood, preached in it
everywhere, and wrote it with the force and fluency of a native
Greek.
from B. W. Johnson. \\The People's New Testament . . . with
\\Explanatory Notes.\\ 1889. Pp. 10.
09162
next 09201