home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1990-05-31 | 838.5 KB | 20,838 lines |
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa12771;
- 16 May 90 5:06 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa00169;
- 16 May 90 3:29 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa18588;
- 16 May 90 2:23 CDT
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 1:27:00 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #351
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005160127.ab07917@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 16 May 90 01:26:25 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 351
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [A. Nonymous]
- Auto-Collect From Payphone [Mark Lowe]
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Communications System [Nigel Allen]
- Korea Tidbits [Ken Dykes]
- AT&T "Excellence" [Carol Springs]
- 1-900-STOPPER [Subodh Bapat]
- The COCOTS Are Coming! [Nigel Whitfield]
- Why Go Back to the Operator? [Carl Moore]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Someone-Someplace <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 90 02:26:24 CDT
- Subject: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: The original letter, with author's identification
- intact, is in my files. The situation is a bit sensitive right now,
- and I agreed to post this. The name of the former employer is also
- deleted. PT]
-
- Patrick:
-
- My tenure at the (deleted) Telephone Company has abrubtly ended. I had
- been wandering around the company's Xenix system while I was at work,
- and they didn't like it. (As a disclaimer, I didn't do any damage,
- wasn't stealing proprietary info, etc.) I was doing it out of sheer
- boredom.
-
- I feel the need to let them know about the gaping (and I mean gaping)
- computer and physical security holes they have, but I'm not sure about
- the best way to approach it (or even if I should). I felt that since
- you have quite a bit of experience and wisdom, you might be a good
- person to bounce this off of.
-
- Just to give you an idea of the scope of the security problems, here's
- a couple:
-
- 1. Several root/privileged accounts with no password. This was
- on a system with dial in lines. All of the accounts had standard,
- easily guessable names.
-
- 2. All of the CSR accounts had no passwords, and were also
- easily guessable (first names). Direct access to Xenix was available
- from the CSR accounts.
-
- 3. All of the dial-in lines for the switches in (town 1, town
- 2, and town 3) have the same password that hasn't been changed in
- eons. (I think this is their biggest potential problem).
-
- 4. One of the entranceways to the switch/radio room was in a
- hallway that was publicly accessible in an office building with alot
- of traffic. The only lock on the door is a push button lock with a TWO
- digit combo. No key lock, no deadbolt. Nothing.
-
- It goes on...
-
- How do you think I should approach it? The person that is
- administering the system knows very little about Unix system admin, so
- they rely on the company they bought the system from (this company
- provides the whole billing system). Should I stick my neck out and
- write them a letter, or should I just drop the situation? In the back
- of my mind I'm kind of afraid that there may be security problems
- later, and that the finger may come pointing at me. I haven't passed
- any info to anyone (other than this general info to you) and I don't
- intend to take this any further.
-
- I appreciate your time and help, and I look forward to your response.
-
- (Any reply from you will be held in strict confidence. I just need a
- sounding board to see if I'd be doing the Right Thing.)
-
- -----------------------
-
- [Moderator's Note: Well readers, what do *you* suggest? Post your
- comments here, this person will see them. My suggestion was to simply
- walk away and ignore it. The company would have to prove who was
- responsible for any vandalism or hacking, etc. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 02:20 CDT
- From: MCL9337@tamvenus.bitnet
- Subject: Auto-Collect From Payphone
-
-
- While traipsing through a Texaco today, I needed to place a collect
- call to a company in Austin. While this was acceptable to the
- company, they would require information about who I needed to talk to
- (or an extension) so they could verify with that person that I was
- known to them.
-
- Well, the payphone was one of those nice, hi-tech, talking,
- LCD-display-mongering, ultra-user-friendly models. It wanted to do
- EVERYTHING! This included playing operator!
-
- I entered 0-512-xxx-xxxx and almost immediately an electronic voice
- comes on and says "This is the operator ... if you would like to make a
- collect call, press 1" which I immediately did. Then, the mystery
- voice said, "At the tone, please state your name." I heard and
- obeyed ... "Mark Lowe."
-
- The phone plays it back for me ... "Your name is ... (me recorded
- digitally and very nicely I might add) 'Mark Lowe.'"
-
- The connection is then made ... and the lady who answers must have
- thought it was a joke! The voice said "You are receiving a collect
- call. To accept, enter 1; to refuse, enter 0 and hang up."
-
- The next thing I heard was a female synthetic voice repeating OVER AND
- OVER "Hang up and try your call again."
-
- Needless to say, I decided to wait until I got to a REAL phone.
-
- Talk about taking AOS just a STEP too far!!
-
-
- Mark C. Lowe - KB5III
-
- MCL9337@TAMVENUS.BITNET
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 00:23:37 EDT
- From: Nigel Allen <Nigel.Allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org>
- Subject: Royal Canadian Mounted Police Communications System
-
-
- Here is a "fact sheet" from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police that
- describes the history of its telecommunications services. A complete
- book of fact sheets, covering everything from drug enforcement and
- police dog services to the RCMP band, is available free of charge
- from: Communications and Media Relations Directorate, Royal Canadian
- Mounted Police, 1200 Vanier Parkway, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0R2.
-
- Telecommunications (Fact Sheet No. 21)
-
- Telecommunications Services is responsible for the direction and
- coordination of all units formed for the purpose of providing
- telecommunications systems and services in support of the programs and
- activities of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
-
- Included in these systems are: communications centres (administrative
- and operations); mobile radio services; telephone and data security,
- integrity and availability; Rapid Fax; the Canadian Police Information
- Centre and many more.
-
- Systems are basically regional in scope (such as: Southwestern Ontario
- Communications System [SOCS], the Province of Alberta Communications
- System [PACS}, the Embassy Patrol Communications System within the
- National Capital Region, the Interior of British Columbia
- Communications System [IBCCS] and many more); however, several meet
- the national position/posture of the Force.
-
- HISTORY
-
- In the early years, telegraph systems were used; however, telephones
- were soon adopted as the service became available.
-
- In 1938 an agreement was reached with regional radio station CKCK to
- broadcast police bulletins. This marked the official beginning of
- radio as a means of communication within the Force.
-
- 1939 marked the installation of the first station-to-car radio system
- at St. Charles, Manitoba.
-
- In 1947 installations in Manitoba were enlarged to create a
- communications network that covered the three prairie provinces.
-
- Communications were gradually expnaded until two-way radios became
- standard equipment in most police cars, ships, aircraft, detachments
- and other establishments maintained by the RCMP throughout the
- country.
-
- Appointed as Canadian representative to Interpol in 1949, the Force
- established communication with police organizations world wide.
-
- The early 1950's saw the installation of Telex equipment to the RCMP's
- growing communications system. In 1967 wirephoto facsimiles were added
- to the Force's communications systems. A documents facsimiles system
- was added in the mid-1980s. Because of this latest addition, the
- amount of Telex equipment still in service is minimal.
-
- TODAY
-
- The wirephoto and documents facsimiles allow reproduction of
- photographs, fingerprints and documents to be transmitted across the
- country. This network has kep pace with technology and now reaches all
- sub-divisions and many detachments throughout Canada.
-
- The total number of persons Force-wide engaged in communications
- activities exceeds 1,000.
-
- The Force's telecommunications network is reported to be the biggest
- non-military, mobile communications system in the world. It comprises
- approximately 7,000 mobile radios, 7,000 portable radios, 1,021
- detachment base stations, 520 repeater stations, 55 communications
- centres and 50 workshops.
-
- REFERENCES
-
- RCMP Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 3
-
- The Pictorial History of the RCMP, S. Horrall, McGraw-Hill Ryerson
-
- (end of Fact Sheet No. 21)
-
- Editorial comments from NDA: I'm not clear whether the RCMP pioneered
- the police use of some of these technologies, or followed the lead of
- U.S. or other Canadian police forces. Nonetheless, this is an
- interesting bit of history.
-
-
- Nigel Allen - via FidoNet node 1:221/171
- UUCP: uunet!watmath!xenitec!zswamp!250!438!Nigel.Allen
- ARPA: Nigel.Allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 09:55:45 EDT
- From: Ken Dykes <kgdykes@watmath.waterloo.edu>
- Subject: Korea Tidbits
-
- I was in Seoul, Korea for the last 10 days ... I picked up a copy of
- a magazine called "Electronics Korea (A Business Korea Publication)"
- which has news excerpts about the computer industry, etc. Well, lo
- and behold a "regional operating company" is spreading it's wings...
-
-
- CLINCHING A DEAL WITH KTA
-
- In January, NYNEX Corporation signed a memorandum of understanding
- with the Korean Telecommunications Authority at KTA headquarters in
- Seoul. The cooperative agreement was signed in absentia by Mr
- W.C.Ferguson, Chairman and CEO of NYNEX and Mr. Rhee Haewook,
- president of KTA.
-
- Under terms of the agreement there will be an exchange of marketing
- and technical information between the two companies as well as the
- exchange of personnel. THe companies will explore the feasibility of
- joint marketing and technical research projects.
-
- After signing the agreement, Mr. Ferguson stated, "NYNEX seeks to
- develop relationships with telecommunications organiazations like KTA
- all over the world in order to better serve the complex needs of
- multinational customers." He added that "forming key partnerships and
- alliances with telecommunication authorities outside the US is a
- fundamental element in NYNEX's global strategy."
-
- NYNEX has signed similar agreements with a number of
- telecommunications authorities in Europe and the Pacific Basin region,
- including Nippon Telegraph & Telephone, Singapore Telecom, Telecom
- Australia, the DGT of Taiwan, France Telecom, the Dutch PTT, Italy's
- STET, Spain's Telefonica and Data Communications Corporation of Korea.
-
- -------end excerpt-------
-
- DataCom Korea runs their x25 network, x.400 service etc, like
- Telenet/Datapac.
-
- One of the business contacts I was working with tells me that AT&T
- is/has supplied several #5ESS hardware.
-
- My personal usage of the phone system compares "favourably :-)" with
- usage of phones during my visits to the USofA. Quite clean sounding
- lines, quick routing & connection.
-
- My hotel in Seoul allowed room dialed long distance dialing, the room
- paperwork said "a w1,500 service charge shall apply to each long
- distance call" (the currency is about us$1==w705 approx, so w1,500
- about $2.13) my call from 00:14:57 to 00:54:00 to Canada cost me
- w19,291 (approx $27.36us)
-
- Two local calls, no timing on the bill, were w150 and w450. the w150
- was definitly a lot closer physically to my hotel area (like six blocks
- away). (w150==$0.22, w450==$0.64)
-
-
- Ken Dykes, Software Development Group, UofWaterloo, Canada [43.47N 80.52W]
- kgdykes@watmath.waterloo.edu [129.97.128.1] watmath!kgdykes
- kgdykes@watmath.uwaterloo.ca postmaster@watbun.waterloo.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Carol Springs <drilex!carols@husc6.harvard.edu>
- Subject: AT&T "Excellence"
- Date: 15 May 90 13:00:42 GMT
- Organization: DRI/McGraw-Hill, Lexington, MA
-
-
- Because I will be traveling overseas in a few months and want to have
- easy use of AT&T's USADIRECT service for dialing the States, I decided
- to order a regular AT&T calling card yesterday. (I suspect that using
- my NET calling card number would work just fine -- in fact, since I
- didn't bother asking for a non-phone number card, the AT&T number will
- no doubt be the same -- but I didn't want to chance AT&T's overseas
- billing accepting customers only on phone card calls.) The customer
- service rep seemed a little confused that I would want an AT&T card
- without changing my default carrier, but she processed the order
- anyway. At the end of the call, she asked, "And would you say that I
- gave you excellent service this evening?" I said "Yes" to avoid any
- hassle, but I was floored.
-
- I find myself wondering whether that line is just to associate AT&T and
- "excellence" in customers' minds (in my mind, it's more AT&T and
- "chutzpah" at this point) or whether AT&T is planning a marketing
- campaign saying "Ninety-nine per cent of our customer service callers
- rated AT&T's service as 'excellent'..."
-
- Incidentally, I decided to order the AT&T card after finding that
- Sprint does not yet offer access to Sprint operators from the country
- I'll be in. When the Sprint rep asked me where, specifically, I'd be
- traveling and I said "the Netherlands," she asked me whether that was
- the United Kingdom.
-
- A side note: Sprint has finally announced Sprint Plus to its current
- customers in SprintLine, the insert that comes with the monthly bill.
- (It makes sense; some people at this point would be thinking of
- switching to Reach Out America or to MCI's plan if something like
- Sprint Plus weren't available.) This month's brochure also contains
- info on the Sprint Visa.
-
-
- Carol Springs carols@drilex.dri.mgh.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Subodh Bapat <mailrus!uflorida!rm1!bapat@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: 1-900-STOPPER
- Date: Mon, 14 May 90 9:32:52 EDT
-
-
- National Public Radio (5-11-90) reports that a firm called Private
- Lines Inc. in Los Angeles is offering a Caller-ID blocking service
- for people who do not want their outgoing ANI revealed. They have set
- up a 900 service which can be called from anywhere (1-900-STOPPER)
- which basically simply gives you another dial tone. In response to
- this dial tone, you then dial the number you actually want to call.
- The 900 service does not pass on your ANI, not does it maintain any
- database anywhere linking your incoming ANI to the outgoing call you
- make through it. The tab: $2.00/minute.
-
- The owner admits that he has not anticipated situations in which he
- may be required by law enforcement agencies to maintain a linking
- database in case it is determined that criminal activity is being
- conducted using his service.
-
- As Robert Siegel of NPR speculated, the price of freedom may be
- eternal vigilance, but the price of privacy seems to be $2.00/minute.
-
-
- Subodh Bapat novavax!rm1!bapat@uunet.uu.net OR bapat@rm1.uucp
- MS E-204, P.O.Box 407044, Racal-Milgo, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33340 (305) 846-6068
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: Nigel Whitfield <nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk>
- Subject: The COCOTS Are Coming!
- Date: 15 May 90 15:04:02 BST (Tue)
- From: Nigel Whitfield <nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk>
-
-
- Last week I was in a restaurant in central London, which used to have
- an ordinary payphone in it. That payphone is still there, but a new
- one has appeared next to it.
-
- The signs on the new phone, which only accepts credit cards, say that
- it is a "3C Communications Payphone." There is no tariff listed
- anywhere near it. Rather than allow people to dial the operator in
- the normal way, so that people can use their BT charge cards or have a
- call charged to their home bill, the 3C phone had various odd
- features:
-
- Emergency calls (999) had a special button to press. Directory
- enquiries and the "3C helpline" were all accessed by pressing # and
- then a single digit.
-
- I've never seen anything like this in the UK before, and I didn't have
- time to ring the helpline and find out. Anyone else come across these
- things in the UK yet?
-
-
- Nigel Whitfield 120 Canterbury Road
- nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk Harrow, HA1 4PB
- n.whitfield@cc.ic.ac.uk 081-861 5106
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 10:26:52 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Why Go Back to the Operator?
-
-
- When I make a self-service credit-card call via any carrier, I try to
- get back to the dial tone when I am done, to be sure the charging has
- stopped. I know that when I do this when using AT&T, my attempt to
- hang up sometimes only "flashes the switchhook" and sends me back to
- the AT&T operator. Why?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #351
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa15209;
- 16 May 90 6:26 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab00169;
- 16 May 90 3:31 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ag18588;
- 16 May 90 2:25 CDT
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 1:59:28 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #352
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005160159.ab11697@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 16 May 90 01:58:57 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 352
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [Brandon S. Allbery]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [Nigel Allen]
- Re: Legislation Regulating COCOTs and AOSs (Splashing) [Ihor J. Kinal]
- Re: Voice Information Services [Sam Ho]
- Re: Local Telco Relationship with Ohio PUC [Craig R. Watkins]
- Re: "Hello Sweetheart, Get Me An Area Code" [David Tamkin]
- Re: Pricing vrs. Cost of Touch-tone Service [David Tamkin]
- Re: Pricing vrs. Cost of Touch-tone Service [Roy Smith]
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [Julian Macassey]
- Re: AOSs, COCOTs and Hotels [Paul S. Sawyer]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: "Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR" <allbery@ncoast.org>
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers
- Reply-To: "Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR" <allbery@ncoast.org>
- Organization: North Coast Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, OH
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 23:56:12 GMT
-
-
- As quoted from <7752@accuvax.nwu.edu> by amb@hudson.cs.columbia.edu
- (Andrew M. Boardman):
-
- | Tom Ace:
- | >I'm going to be moving soon, and I'm considering getting a phone
- | >number ending in -0000 at my new residence.
-
- | Edward Greenberg:
- | >Once I had 541-2345. It wasn't pleasant. A few adolescents found me
- | >and my answering machine, and gave me no piece. I recommend a less
- | >distinguished number.
-
- | A friend was once trying to get 234-5678. It was a valid and local
- | exchange, and the number was not taken. NYTel would *not* give it to
- | him, no reason given. The problem with getting a -0000 number may be
- | in the getting of it!
-
- Ticketron has a number in the 216 area code which ends in 0000 (to be
- exact, 524-0000); I would expect that "easy to remember" numbers like
- that would be snapped up by commercial types. Of course, they may
- regret it after they start getting hundreds of calls from kids playing
- with the phone....
-
-
- Me: Brandon S. Allbery VHF: KB8JRR on 224.50 (Lake County, OH)
- Internet: allbery@NCoast.ORG Delphi: ALLBERY
- uunet!cwjcc.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery America OnLine: BrandonA or KB8JRR
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- Date: Mon, 14 May 90 21:10:00 EST
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers
-
-
- ....replying to tom@ecureuil.apple.com
-
- Out of consideration to people who might be calling your from a
- rotary-dial telephone, don't choose a number ending in 0000, as that
- represents 40 pulses to dial the final four digits.
-
- Before touch-tone phones became commonplace, large business users
- would prefer numbers ending 1111 (or perhaps 1212) as their primary
- number, because such numbers would be the fastest to dial from a
- rotary dial. (The best known telephone number in Toronto is 967-1111,
- the central order number for the Pizza Pizza chain.) The alternative
- 1212 ending might be preferable because people might forget how many
- ones they had dialled, which is probably why long distance directory
- assistance is 555-1212 rather than 555-1111. (And in the days of
- step-by-step exchanges, sometimes it wasn't even necessary to dial the
- final digit of a number ending in 11. You would hear a ringing signal
- once you had dialled the sixth digit of 368-6041, CNCP
- Telecommunications' Toronto telegraph office, as all the 368-604x
- numbers were telegraph office numbers, as were the 368-605x and
- probably some others as well. This was probably true for a lot of
- large PBXs and reservation bureaux.)
-
- With a 0000 telephone number, you wouldn't just have to worry about
- the local kids. You'd also be bothered by calls from bored Telecom
- Digest readers looking for interesting test tones and telco recorded
- announcements. <grin, I think>
-
-
- * Origin: Echo Beach, Toronto, Canada (Opus 1:250/438)
-
- MaS Relayer v1.00.00
-
- Message gatewayed by MaS Network Software and Consulting/HST
- Internet: nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- UUCP: ...tmsoft!masnet!f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org!nigel.allen
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 12:58:40 EDT
- From: Ihor J Kinal <ijk@violin.att.com>
- Subject: Re: Legislation Regulating COCOTs and AOSs [splashing]
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- In article <7641@accuvax.nwu.edu>, wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil (Will
- Martin) writes:
-
- > As a Missouri resident, I can testify that ALL calls within Missouri
- > cost *far* more than interstate calls, so the example shown in the
- > above would result in savings to the consumer -- the cost of the call
- > from Dallas to St. Louis will be less than the cost of an intrastate
- > Kansas City-to-St. Louis call, and the consumer comes out ahead.
-
- INSTRASTATE CALLS ARE TYPICALLY MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE THAN INTERSTATE.
-
- Just to cite two examples: I remember before divestiture, living in
- New York, and noting that a typical call from NY City to Buffalo
- [about 400 miles] was more expensive than a call to California.
-
- A couple months ago, I was flying to Dallas - my plane got diverted to
- Austin [a couple hundred miles south of Dallas]. I called back to New
- Jersey [some 1400 miles away], using a credit card, then continued to
- call Dallas. I was surprised that the New Jersey calls, although they
- lasted several minutes more than the Dallas call, came out costing
- less. In fact, it would have been cheaper if the person I called in
- New Jersey then bridged my call back to Dallas. [Based on geography,
- it wouldn't surprise me to see my call routed thru Dallas on its way
- to New Jersey].
-
- NOTE THAT IN ALL CASES THE SAME COMPANY COMPLETED THE CALLS.
-
- It seems strange, but I guess FCC competitive rates don't apply
- intra-state.
-
-
- #include standard disclaimers.
-
- Ihor Kinal
- att!cbnewsh!ijk
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 10:15:16 PDT
- From: Sam Ho <samho@larry.cs.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: Voice Information Services
-
-
- Here are some more touch-tone information services:
- These are all in Seattle.
-
- Seattle Times Infoline
- 206-464-2000
- Has local weather (990x)
- National Accu-Weather (90xx)
- Dow Jones
- Stock quotes
- Soap opera Summary
-
- American Directory Company Yellow Pages That Talk
- 206-624-4500
- Contains a variety of recorded advertising
- Public-service type announcements:
- Zoo, aquarium, first aid, Medical help, opera, etc.
-
- Radio and TV stations:
- e.g. KCMS, KCIS, by call letters (5247 & 5267)
- KING, KOMO by frequency (1090, 1000)
- KMPS by frequency repeated (9494)
- KING-TV by channel repeated (5555)
-
- Horoscopes and other miscellaneous stuff which I don't remember.
-
- Western District Bankruptcy Court
- 206-442-8543
- Type in the name of a debtor on the touch-tone keypad.
- E.g. Johnson, West = 56467669378#
-
- Oh, also, two major bank ATM networks have locator services:
- Plus: 1-800-THE-PLUS
- Cirrus: 1-800-4CIRRUS
-
- Both of these want an NPA and exchange, to provide the nearest
- ATMs to that location.
-
-
- Sam Ho
- samho@larry.cs.washington.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Craig R. Watkins" <CRW@icf.hrb.com>
- Subject: Re: Local Telco Relationship with Ohio PUC
- Date: 15 May 90 18:16:56 EST
- Organization: HRB Systems
-
-
- In article <7704@accuvax.nwu.edu>, showard@ucqais.uc.edu (Steve
- Howard) writes:
-
- > She left her
- > name & number and said that if I had any further problems to call her
- > directly and she would get it taken care of immediately!!!!! We
- > didn't have any more problems!!!
-
- This may just be urban legend, but when I was in Rocheter, NY about
- ten years ago the story went that Rochester Tel had a field in
- customer service records that denoted whether you had ever complained
- to the PUC (or was it PSC in NY?). If this field was non-blank, the
- word was that it entitled you to superior service responses!
-
-
- Craig R. Watkins Internet: CRW@ICF.HRB.COM
- HRB Systems, Inc. Bitnet: CRW%HRB@PSUECL
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 20:27 CDT
- From: David Tamkin <dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: "Hello Sweetheart, Get Me An Area Code"
-
-
- Macy Hallock wrote in volume 10, issue 349:
-
- | One factor I haven't seen mentioned in the Digest yet: Small rural CO's,
- | known as CDO's (Community Dial Office), sometimes only have a couple
- | hundred lines in service, but use an entire NNX. Not too far from here
- | are literally dozens of these small offices...
-
- Perhaps it is impossible on the equipment in use in those CDO's, and
- perhaps the need for prefixes in area code 216 is not critical enough
- to change subscribers' telephone numbers over it, but I've noticed
- that sharing prefixes is apparently possible. It beats me how other
- switches know where to route a call to a split prefix, since when I've
- asked how to tell before dialing where the number is served (say, by
- blocks of consecutive numbers assigned to one office or the other),
- the answer from the provider has always been a synonym of "duh".
-
- In northeastern Illinois, (708) 531 is partly in the Bellwood CO and
- partly in Hillside. There are rate centers named Bellwood, Hillside,
- and Maywood, with some Maywood prefixes in the Bellwood CO and some in
- Hillside. Both parts of 531 are in the Maywood rate center, but
- Illinois Bell charges for local calls according to distance between
- CO's, so if Bellwood is in one band from your CO and Hillside in
- another, you have no idea which rate you pay for a call to a number on
- the 531 prefix.
-
- Our other two shared prefixes are easier to tell: you just ask, "Is
- this a mobile phone?" (312) 569 has some lines belonging to Cellular
- One (recently relocated from the Schaumburg switch [Roselle rate
- center] to their Chicago switch [Chicago Zone 1]) and some belonging
- to Illinois Bell for dedicated foreign exchange service to the
- northwest suburbs: the lines are actually switched in the Elk Grove CO
- but calls are billed as if to or from the Newcastle CO in Chicago Zone
- 3.
-
- The other one is easier yet: Ameritech Mobile's lines on (312) 590
- [formerly Northbrook switch and rate center, now in their Congress
- switch in Chicago Zone 1] remained in 312 but Illinois Bell's lines on
- the 590 prefix [Arlington Heights CO and rate center] are now in area
- code 708.
-
- So apparently different CO's can share a prefix.
-
-
- David Tamkin Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 708-518-6769 312-693-0591
- dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 20:31 CDT
- From: David Tamkin <dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: Pricing vrs. Cost of Touch-tone Service
-
-
- Peter Weiss wrote in volume 10, issue 349:
-
- | A side note: if you've programmed your modem to the lowest duration and
- | delays for one DTMF processor (possibly the CO), those same values might
- | not work with another e.g., voice processing equipment.
-
- No kidding! The tones on my BellSouth Associate II are brief blips,
- no matter how long one holds the button down. My pay-by-phone service
- frequently misses them and sometimes my voice mailbox can't catch them
- either. It helps if I key the sequences slowly (no more than perhaps
- one keypress per second) or, strangely, if I store them in memory and
- let them be sent from memory locations rather than by individual
- keypresses, even though the tones are just as staccato and far more
- rapid.
-
-
- David Tamkin Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 708-518-6769 312-693-0591
- dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
- Subject: Re: Pricing vrs. Cost of Touch-tone Service
- Organization: Public Health Research Institute, New York City
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 15:10:36 GMT
-
-
- I wrote:
-
- > A TT phone wouldn't break dial tone.
-
- ecl@mtgzy.att.com (Evelyn C Leeper) replied:
-
- > open up the phone and reverse the polarity (i.e., swap the red and
- > green wires). This solves the "won't-break-dialtone" problem.
-
- Perhaps my use of the phrase "break dialtone" was improper. I
- think the problem Evelyn's suggestion solves is not having power to
- the tone generator in the phone, so when you press the button you
- don't get any tone. That's not what I had. I would get a tone, but
- when I released the button, I still had dialtone. That's what I meant
- by "not breaking dialtone". Is that the canonical definition?
-
-
- Roy Smith, Public Health Research Institute
- 455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016
- roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu -OR- {att,cmcl2,rutgers,hombre}!phri!roy
- "Arcane? Did you say arcane? It wouldn't be Unix if it wasn't arcane!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Julian Macassey <julian@bongo.uucp>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
- Date: 16 May 90 05:07:07 GMT
- Organization: The Hole in the Wall Hollywood California U.S.A.
-
-
- In article <7739@accuvax.nwu.edu>, johnp@hpgrla.gr.hp.com (John
- Parsons) writes:
-
- > We're building a house and it's almost time to wire it, so I thought
- > I'd fish for a little free advice ;-) ...
-
- > This is a two-story, wood-frame house with full basement. I'm
- > planning to bring in two lines, one for private use and one for my
- > wife's mail-order business. We hope to live there a long time, so I'm
- > going to run a four or five-pair underground cable in from the telco's
- > connection box (the green thing out by the street) for possible future
- > additions.
-
- Get the Telco to put in a six pair drop with a network interface.
-
- > Any suggested changes to the Joe-Average approach of wiring a
- > four-wire modular jack to every room? What traps may I be walking
- > into? Any recommendations for two-line phones? Radio Shack's and
- > Pac*Bell's look o.k., but are they reliable?
-
- I am not really going to consider what would be flung into the
- average house - quad wire all round.
-
- My suggestion if you are going to do it yourself is put in six
- pair 22 gauge wire. At least one jack per room and include the
- crapper, even if you never put a jack there.
-
- Now six pair is a minimum. In my opinion twelve would be
- better. Note that putting wire in is a hassle. It is a real pain when
- the house is built and decorated and large furniture is in the way.
- Bung it all in now and forget it. Sure two line only requires two
- pair. What if you get a fax for the mail order biz? What about modems?
- Think ahead. Wire is pretty cheap. Ripping the house apart later to
- slip in another pair in is pretty damn expensive.
-
- Bring all the wire to a central point. A closet or corner of
- the basement. Make sure there is a power outlet there. Punch the wires
- down onto "66 blocks". Now you can feed individual jacks or put a key
- system or PBX in at a later date. You may consider running conduit
- from the jacks to the central point. If you do it with conduit, you
- can "pull" more cable later - You could even pull coax or fiber-optic
- later. You can use plastic flexiduct type conduit, you don't have to
- use the electrical aluminium stuff.
-
- And now two line phones. The Pac-Bell ones if they are made by
- Telequest are junk, save your money. Panasonic have some nice 2 line
- phones. I can't comment on the Rat-Shack phones, but some of their
- feature phones are Panasonics in Rat-Shack cases.
-
- Consider also putting in duplex jacks and have one jack per
- line. Then of course if you have installed right, slipping in a small
- key system will be a breeze.
-
-
- Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo.info.com ucla-an!denwa!bongo!julian
- N6ARE@K6IYK (Packet Radio) n6are.ampr.org [44.16.0.81] voice (213) 653-4495
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Paul S. Sawyer" <unhd!unhtel!paul@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: AOSs, COCOTs and Hotels
- Organization: UNH Telecommunications and Network Services
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 17:15:19 GMT
-
-
- I was in New Jersey last week, staying at a no-frills motel named
- Mcintosh or Macintosh (not Apple 8-) where they seem to emphasize
- telephone convenience for guests. Their local calls are free, they DO
- NOT add surcharges on long distance, and their 1+ carrier is AT&T. At
- least three different printed items stated this, and the desk clerk
- emphasized it in her "motel features" speech. This seems to be a
- small chain, at least three in N.J.
-
-
- Paul S. Sawyer uunet!unh!unhtel!paul paul@unhtel.UUCP
- UNH Telecommunications attmail!psawyer p_sawyer@UNHH.BITNET
- Durham, NH 03824-3523 VOX: +1 603 862 3262 FAX: +1 603 862 2030
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #352
- ******************************
-
- ISSUES REVERSED IN TRANSMISSION. 353 WILL COME AFTER 354.
-
-
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa07589;
- 17 May 90 1:58 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa07519;
- 16 May 90 23:44 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab28084;
- 16 May 90 22:39 CDT
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 21:57:20 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #354
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005162157.ab13056@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 16 May 90 21:55:50 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 354
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Leonard Rose Indicted by Federal Grand Jury [TELECOM Moderator]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Marty Schulman]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Peter da Silva]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Peter Weiss]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Jeffrey M. Schweiger]
- Re: Toll Switching Centers for Area Code 809 [David Leibold]
- Re: Flip Side of Caller ID [Jeremy Grodberg]
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [David Carter]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [Glynne Tolar]
- Re: Interesting DMS Trick [Douglas Scott Reuben]
- Re: Connection of a British Phone Outside Britain [Julian Macassey]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 19:22:21 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Leonard Rose Indicted by Federal Grand Jury
-
-
- Leonard Rose Jr., computer consultant, system administrator for
- 'netsys' and former Usenet participant was indicted Tuesday by a
- federal grand jury for allegedly helping others break into computer
- systems throughout the country. In addition, Rose is charged in an
- alleged scheme to steal and give out closely guarded software for AT&T
- UNIX computer systems. AT&T says about one million UNIX computers are
- in use in the country. For now, I will resist the strong temptation
- to say 'I told you so'.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 13:01:50 EDT
- From: Marty Schulman <schulman@umd5.umd.edu>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
-
-
- Perhaps that title should read "...Gaping Security Holes..."
-
- Does the Public Utilities Commision oversee this telephone company?
- What about a board of directors, or other group with a direct
- financial interest?
-
- Since you're already been let go, what risk would be involved in
- sending a letter to the head of security, and sending a
- (return-receipt-requested?) copy to the PUC or board of governors or
- whatever? Then you've covered yourself, and you've alerted both the
- people who administer the system and the people who should care the
- most.
-
- Marty
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 21:32:32 -0400
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- From: Peter da Silva <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
- Reply-To: Peter da Silva <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
- Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
-
-
- I would write a letter to the person accountable for security
- explaining what the holes are, how they could be exploited, and how to
- fix them. Send it certified mail and keep a photocopy.
-
- I don't know the circumstances in which you left the company, but
- since you seem to feel ethically bound to help solve the problem (as I
- would be) this is should force them to act *and* cover your rear.
-
- Personally, I would have alerted them to the problem *before* leaving...
-
-
- `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
- 'U` Have you hugged your wolf today? <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
- @FIN Dirty words: Zhghnyyl erphefvir vayvar shapgvbaf.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 06:00 EDT
- From: Peter Weiss +1 814 863 1843 <PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
-
-
- In article <7781@accuvax.nwu.edu>, you say:
-
- >(Any reply from you will be held in strict confidence. I just need a
- >sounding board to see if I'd be doing the Right Thing.)
-
- There are other Usenet groups that could possibly be a better forum
- for this discussion:
-
- alt.security
- bit.listserv.security
- comp.risks
- comp.security.announce
- misc.security
-
- My guess would be misc.security or perhaps alt.security.
-
-
- Peter M. Weiss | (this line intentionally left blank)
- 31 Shields Bldg (the AIS people) | 2 4 6 8 We don't want to calculate!
- University Park, PA USA 16802 | Disclaimer -* +* applies herein
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 08:28:16 PDT
- From: "Jeffrey M. Schweiger" <schweige@cs.nps.navy.mil>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA
-
-
- I'm not all that knowledgeable on the question raised, but it occurs
- to me that fowarding the edited post to the RISKS group, might get the
- question viewed by some of the leading professionals in the computer
- security field.
-
-
- Jeff Schweiger CompuServe: 74236,1645 Standard Disclaimer
- ARPAnet (Defense Data Network): schweige@cs.nps.navy.mil
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Indeed, I imagine any of the newsgroups named by
- Mssrs. Weiss and Schweiger would find A. Nonymous' dilemma to be of
- interest in further discussion. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: woody <djcl@contact.uucp>
- Subject: Re: Toll Switching Centers for Area Code 809
- Reply-To: djcl@contact.UUCP (David Leibold)
- Organization: Contact Public Unix BBS. Toronto, Canada.
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 03:13:30 GMT
-
-
- As far as 809 Directory Assistance goes, wasn't there a posting some
- time back that AT&T has set up something of a service which allows 1
- 809 555.1212 to go to an AT&T operator who asks for the island or
- region, then transfers over to the appropriate operator for the island
- requested?
-
- Meanwhile, I once saw a phone book from the Caribbean mention routings
- for long distance into the U.S. and Canada, where the Canadian routing
- was listed as going into Montreal. Years ago, attempts at dialing 1
- 809 555.1212 from Ontario met with an announcement generated in
- Montreal (a "514" recording identifier). Nowadays, attempts to do 1
- 809 555.1212 are blocked at the nearest toll switch; that is, it won't
- leave the area code anymore.
-
- Attempts to dial 1 905 555.1212 years ago also used to be intercepted
- outside of area code from Canada, down in 214 or something as I
- recall. That, too, passed away with more localised interception.
-
- Hope many of you enjoy the NNX listings for 809 ... does anyone know
- when Trinidad and Tobago go off on their own country code (296) and
- get out of the NANP?
-
-
- || djcl@contact.uucp / David Leibold
-
- [Moderator's Note: Mr. Leibold's reference was to the 'npa.809.prefix'
- file in Telecom Archives. (ftp lcs.mit.edu) PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 15:04:18 PDT
- From: Jeremy Grodberg <jgro@apldbio.com>
- Subject: Re: Flip Side of Caller-ID
- Reply-To: jgro@apldbio.com (Jeremy Grodberg)
-
-
- In article <7645@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com> writes:
-
- >leichter@lrw.com writes:
-
- >> Private Lines is trying to patent the idea "to prevent the proliferation of
- >> identical 900 services and competition on price," though they concede that
- >> getting such a patent might be difficult.
-
- >You bet it will be difficult. You can't patent an idea, only a device.
-
- This is not strictly true. You can patent methods and uses, which is
- why some software is patentable. Suppose you come up with a better
- way to tan leather: you microwave it for 112 minutes. You can get a
- patent on the method (or idea) of tanning leather by microwaving it.
- I know of a patent which covers the use of a sodium fluoride solution
- for the treatment of acne; they haven't patented the solution (which
- is basically your standard fluoride mouthwash), just the use of the
- solution to treat acne. (There is not much evidence that it works
- better than soap and water, BTW.)
-
- The idea of using a 900 number to avoid ANI would probably be
- patentable if it were not so obvious. It is explicitly not allowed to
- grant a patent for something "obvious to anyone skilled in the art,"
- and I think that is the case here.
-
-
- Jeremy Grodberg
- jgro@apldbio.com "Beware: free advice is often overpriced!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 18:52:19 -0400
- From: David Carter <gtnetdc@prism.gatech.edu>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
- Reply-To: gtnetdc@prism.gatech.edu
- Organization: Network 23
-
-
- In addition to the useful suggestions that Julian Macassey made in his
- followup posting, it has been mentioned here previously (and I have
- observed firsthand) that if you have multiple phone lines on a multi
- pair cable, and you use one line for fax or modem, you will probably
- be able to hear it faintly when you use another line for voice at the
- same time. If you think this might bother you at all (it did me),
- then run separate cables. Perhaps two two-pair cables to each room, or
- more. Multiple modem/fax lines don't *seem* to interfere with each
- other, but with higher data rate devices (e.g. 19200 bps or even ISDN)
- this might become a problem.
-
- Make sure the pairs are twisted! This definitely will improve the
- crosstalk and noise problems. You may have to peel back the jacket to
- verify that the pairs are twisted.
-
- Consider including a phone jack behind your television set. Some
- cable TV systems use telephone lines for things like Pay Per View and
- interactive TV. Yours might not have it now, but could add it. You
- probably should also build in an easy way to get new cables there
- (conduit to basement and make sure you can get from there outside to
- where the wires will come in) when they expand the number of coax's or
- change over to fiber.
-
- And finally, put in a huge conduit to get from the basement to the
- attic. I've known several people in two-story houses who wanted to
- add new phone jacks or cable TV drops to a room upstairs, and the only
- way they could do it was by running wires under the carpet up the
- stairs or on the exterior of the house.
-
- Makes me want to build a new house so I can add all these neato
- high-tech things that are coming.
-
-
- David Carter
- uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gtnetdc
- Internet: gtnetdc@prism.gatech.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: gtolar@pro-europa.cts.com (Glynne Tolar)
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers
- Date: 16 May 90 23:36:08 GMT
-
-
- In-Reply-To: message from nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
-
- Speaking of easy phone numbers, just exactly how do you get them?
- When I called my phone company they told me I had to take whatever
- came across the computer. If I did not like it she could ask for
- another number. Are you suposed to make the service rep sit there for
- an hour or more looking for the number you would like? What do
- businesses do? My guess is the phone company has a different policy
- for business customers.
-
- What does your phone company do?
-
-
- UUCP: {nosc, nosc] ..!crash!pro-europa!gtolar / INET: gtolar@pro-europa.cts.com
- ARPA: crash!pro-europa!gtolar@nosc.mil / BITNET: pro-europa.uucp!gtolar@psuvax1
- AO: GlynneT / CI$: 73557,2316 / BBS: (713) 476-9998, User #2.
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Illinois Bell takes suggestions, and will fill them
- except under certain circumstances. Try consulting a criss-cross book
- and looking for idle, and desirable numbers. Detirmine if in fact they
- are not being used, and when you call telco ask for them by number.
- See if the rep will comply. Usually they will. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 16-MAY-1990 02:15:08.33
- From: "DOUGLAS SCOTT REUBEN)" <DREUBEN@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Subject: Re: Interesting DMS Trick
-
-
- Hmm ... you say I can flash the hookswitch, get the three-way tone, hang up
- and it will ring? (IE, not dial a number on the second dial tone?)
-
- Doesn't seem to work from "my" DMS-100, but then again, mine is a DMS
- which gives a re-order instead of a busy signal!
-
- (OK, OK, so the DMS only does that SOME of the time, but in twenty years
- on my crossbar it's never done that once! (Of course, my crossbar has
- never been able to do call-waiting or three-way calling either! :-) )
-
-
- Doug
-
- dreuben@eagle.wesleyan.edu /@wesleyan.bitnet /and locals know the rest!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Julian Macassey <julian@bongo.uucp>
- Subject: Re: Connection of a British Phone Outside Britain
- Date: 16 May 90 06:25:24 GMT
- Organization: The Hole in the Wall Hollywood California U.S.A.
-
-
- In article <7742@accuvax.nwu.edu>, tjfs%tadtec.uucp@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk
- (Tim Steele) writes:
-
- > The 'master socket' contains a capacitor and resistor wired in series
- > across 2 and 5 with the junction connected to pin 4. All extension
- > sockets are wired in parallel with the master socket.
-
- > Pins 1 and 6 are reserved for ISDX (digital telephony).
- > Pins 2 and 5 are for connection to the line.
- > Pin 3 is for earth recall - it can be connected to earth at the socket
- > for PABX applications. The phone connects 2 to 3 when the RECALL
- > button is pressed.
- > Pin 4 drives the bells/ringers on all the phones.
-
- > The reason for this bizarre arrangement is to prevent extension bells
- > tinkling when one extension dials out using pulse (LD) dialling. Each
- > phone therefore shorts out pin 4 to pin 5 when dialling.
-
- > I'd be very interested if someone can post how this problem is
- > overcome in the US.
-
-
- In the US, bell tap (Bell tinkle) is usually not a problem. It
- occurs as a problem mainly with imported phones.
-
- In the US there are two types of ringers: Gong ringers (the
- old fashioned bells) and Electronic ringers (the chirpers and
- warblers). The usual reason for the electronic jobbies is cost. It
- costs about $4.00 for a gong ringer and $2.00 for an electronic
- ringer. Of course, electronic key systems don't have the poop for a
- gong ringer so demand a piezo device.
-
- The usual ringing voltage supplied in the US varies between 40
- and 130 Volts. This voltage depends upon a few factors: Distance from
- the CO (Exchange) which cause voltage drop across the length of wire.
- The other major factor is the load on the line which translates into
- the number of ringers across the line. In the US, a standard gong
- ringer is assigned a "Ringer Equivalence Number" of 1. A standard
- phone line will ring 5 of these ringers or an REN of 5. Some
- electronic ringers have RENs of 0.5 etc so you can usually get more of
- these on the line than gongs. But alas the electronic ones are not as
- loud and are especially hard to hear above loud rock music.
-
- None of the above has yet answered the question which was how
- do they beat bell tap in the the US. This is done two ways. First of
- all, the old fashioned way, or how to do it with a gong ringer.
-
- Pretty simple in theory, but sometimes a bitch to manufacture.
- You make the bell "electro-mechanically resonant". In the US, the
- standard frequency of the ringing signal is 20 Hz, this is known as
- type A. But there are several frequencies that can be used. These
- frequencies are spelled out in several documents, one of these is FCC
- Rules and Regulations Part 68 CONNECTION OF TERMINAL EQUIPMENT TO THE
- TELEPHONE NETWORK. Below is an abbreviated partial list from that
- document.
-
- TYPE Frequency
- A 20 Hz +- 3 30 Hz +- 3
- B 15.3 to 68.0 Hz
- C 15.3 to 17.4
- N 65.4 to 68.0
-
- A gong ringer, by design of the coil and clapper mechanism is
- designed to respond to only a certain frequency. The ringer can be
- "tuned" by adjusting a bias spring. This way a ringer ignores dial
- pulses and hook-switch flashes. Believe or not, using these bells,
- bell tap is just about unknown in the US.
-
- The common ringing voltage is 20 Hz. The reason for all the
- other frequencies is usually party lines - different frequencies for
- different subscribers, as well as different grounding schemes. Note
- that the Type A ringer is resonant to 30 Hz as well as 20 Hz. In the
- US the AC line frequency is 60 Hz and the ringing voltage from 1A2 key
- systems is half the line voltage - 30 Hz.
-
- One part of the US that uses funny ringing frequencies is
- Hawaii. Years ago happy vacationers used to rip off the GTE phones in
- hawaii and wonder why the ringers wouldn't work when they plugged them
- in at home. I once had a rural police chief bring me his ripped off
- Hawaiian GTE phone because it couldn't ring. The local Pacific Bell
- guys couldn't figure out why it wouldn't ring. They applied the right
- ring voltage, just not the right frequency.
-
- The Type B specification, is for the electronic ringers. They
- respond to just about any frequency. In practice, many Type B ringers
- will respond at 100 Hz and above. They do not bell tap because they
- have a circuit built in to them which provides a form of hysteresis.
- The AC ringing voltage has to be continuously present for a certain
- length of time before the output turns on to drive a piezo element
- etc. I have noticed that some electronic ringers from Europe bell tap.
- One phone I recall had a Mitel ringer chip. Upon inspection, I noticed
- that the R/C bell tap suppression components had been left out. I
- added them and the bell tap went away.
-
-
- Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo.info.com ucla-an!denwa!bongo!julian
- N6ARE@K6IYK (Packet Radio) n6are.ampr.org [44.16.0.81] voice (213) 653-4495
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #354
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa07962;
- 17 May 90 2:04 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa28084;
- 16 May 90 22:38 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa23970;
- 16 May 90 21:34 CDT
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 21:00:24 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #353
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005162100.ab13053@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 16 May 90 21:00:34 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 353
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- 2600 Magazine Article on Jolnet, et al [TELECOM Moderator]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Jonathan A. Solomon]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Ken Leonard]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [John R. Galloway Jr.]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Wally Kramer]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Dave Mc Mahan]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Steve Wolfson]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Isaac Rabinovitch]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 20:02:38 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: 2600 Magazine Article on Jolnet, et al
-
-
- This is as good a time as any to mention a new exhibit in the Telecom
- Archives donated by folks involved with {2600 Magazine}. The Spring,
- 1990 issue of that magazine has an interesting article on the fiasco
- at Jolnet, et al, and it has been offered to the Digest for
- publication as well.
-
- Due to its length, it cannot be transmitted as a Digest, or even as a
- special issue. It *will be* available in the archives starting this
- weekend for pulling by anyone interested. 2600 Magazine has requested
- that we not have it available until the magazine itself is released,
- so I have to keep it restricted until sometime this weekend. I've read
- it, and I strongly recommend you pull the file and read it also.
-
- Look for the file 'jolnet-2600.magazine.art' beginning May 20 in the
- Telecom Archives.
-
- FTP: 'ftp lcs.mit.edu' use anonymous login 'cd telecom-archives'
- MAIL SERVER: Send letter with FTP commands to 'bitftp@pucc.princeton.edu'
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 1990 17:19:09 EDT
- From: "Jonathan A. Solomon" <jsol@eddie.mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
-
-
- Well, Patrick, I suggest that A. Nonymous drop the issue. The security
- holes are (at least IMHO) planted there to find the crooks, and also
- as a way to prevent someone from having to go through the pain and
- anguish of "what's my password this week".
-
- Kevin Mitnick was caught on a COSMOS system which had no security, and
- that wasn't changed even though he was caught. They just sat there in
- the security headquarters and waited for the next person to hit the
- bait (sort of like your story).
-
- Just because there's a security problem does NOT require you to fix
- it. You may wish to take the risk or you may have some other way of
- doing security ... Think of it like CALL TRACE. You get a bogus call,
- you have the choice of typing the code to trace the call or not. I
- don't think BELL has any idea of how to do passwords right, since they
- don't have passworded phone numbers.... :-)
-
- Also, I should point out that Xenix is sold "AS IS" and if you want it
- fixed you can 1) hire a contractor, or 2) beg the company to fix it.
- Both options cost big bucks.
-
-
- jsol
-
- [Moderator's Note: Jon Solomon was the founder of TELECOM Digest and
- served as the Moderator here for several years. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Ken Leonard <kleonard@gvlv1.gvl.unisys.com>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Date: 16 May 90 13:09:58 GMT
- Reply-To: Ken Leonard <gvlv1!kleonard@gvlv2.gvl.unisys.com>
- Organization: Unisys Defense Systems, NISD, Great Valley Laboratory
-
-
- In article <7781@accuvax.nwu.edu> telecom@eecs.nwu.edu (Someone-Someplace)
- writes:
-
- * My tenure at the (deleted) Telephone Company has abrubtly ended. I had
- * been wandering around the company's Xenix system while I was at work,
- * and they didn't like it. (As a disclaimer, I didn't do any damage,
-
- * I feel the need to let them know about the gaping (and I mean gaping)
- * computer and physical security holes they have, but I'm not sure about
- * the best way to approach it (or even if I should). I felt that since
-
- * How do you think I should approach it? The person that is
-
- (IMHO)
- 1) Do what you know is right. Tell them about it. Tell them everything
- you know in as much detail as you can muster.
-
- 2) Cover your tail in respect of being able to prove that you told
- them. Go to you family attorney (like, who drafted your will) and
- have her send your letter with a cover letter clearly stating that
- your original is on file for proof. Make darn sure that you get proof
- of delivery to a responsible _individual_. Any decent attorney should
- charge you less than $50.00 for the whole thing, including keeping the
- letter and proof of delivery in-file.
-
- 3) Make _darn_ sure that you personal files, hardcopy and in any
- computer you have at home, are _squeaky_ clean. And don't forget your
- archive and backup disks.
-
- 4) Then, let them go to hell in their own basket because they will
- almost certainly ignore the whole thing until someday when the system
- comes crashing down around on their heads.
-
-
- Regards,
- Ken
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "John R. Galloway Jr." <jrg@apple.com>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Date: 16 May 90 17:08:02 GMT
- Organization: Galloway Research
-
-
- In article <7781@accuvax.nwu.edu> telecom@eecs.nwu.edu (Someone-Someplace)
- writes:
- >X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 351, Message 1 of 8
-
- [description of security holes in phone systems and past employees
- request for help in how/if do tell them deleted]
-
- >[Moderator's Note: Well readers, what do *you* suggest? Post your
- >comments here, this person will see them. My suggestion was to simply
- >walk away and ignore it. The company would have to prove who was
- >responsible for any vandalism or hacking, etc. PT]
-
- I disagree completely on PT's suggestion of just walking away. If
- you passed someone's house whom you were not really friends with but
- had known for a time recently and saw that their front door was wide
- open and you knew this was not what the owner wanted, would you just
- walk by? I wouldn't (or I hope I wouldn't).
-
- I suggest you send a letter to the highest level person (manager) in
- the company that you have at least some relationship with (i.e. who
- will know you) or the division director if no one comes to mind, and
- outline just as you have done here what the problems are and (in
- similarly general fashion) what the solutions are. Make it clear that
- you have no intention of using or passing along such information.
- Suggest you have a meeting with the relavant folks to discuss security
- issues. Since the intended outcome of such a meeting will be to get
- them focused on security, not just get details of what specific things
- to do, it shouldn't take more than an hour or so, so I suggest not
- even charging them for it.
-
- As far as being suspected of any future security breaks, one of the
- outcomes of this meeting, or even the letter should be to make it
- clear that there are many people with similar access and knowledge.
- Also before you get into all this, you might want to "complete"
- whatever conversations might be going on for you and management over
- your departure from the company. E.G. if you are pissed off about
- it, tell them so, if they suspect you of something ask them to tell
- you so, etc. The point here would be to keep that issue seperate from
- the security discussions and not have such colored by those present
- thinking about ("oh yea this is that disgruntled guy we fired..."). I
- am not suggesting that you will necessarily make up and be rehired and
- all will be happy ever after, just that the two issues (being let go
- and the security problems) need to be kept seperate, but both dealt
- with.
-
- Hope that wasn't toooo long. Good luck.
-
- -jrg
-
- internet jrg@apple.com John R. Galloway, Jr.
- (soon to be) jrg@galloway.sj.ca.us
- applelink d3413 CEO..receptionist 795 Beaver Creek Way
- human (408) 259-2490 Galloway Research San Jose, CA 95133
-
- These are my views, NOT Apple's, I am a GUEST here, not an employee!!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 12:36:36 PDT
- From: Wally Kramer <wallyk@tekfdi.fdi.tek.com>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Organization: Microwave & RF Instruments, Tektronix, Beaverton, Oregon
-
-
- I'd write an anonymous letter. For someone apparently so concerned
- about the problem, doing nothing is not going to satisfy you.
-
- The letter should be sent to lots (dozens) of relevant people so it
- can't be easily dismissed. It should contain specific easily-testable
- information that non-computer-literate people can test on their own,
- including how to look at (but not change) sensitive information. The
- letter needn't be exhaustive, but contain enough to get somebody fired
- up to call a security expert.
-
- Some hints to keep a letter anonymous (for maximum personal protection):
-
- 1. Write without using proper sentences (just use lists), as writing style
- is identifying and difficult to change.
-
- 2. Avoid giving information which only you would know. Keep it vague if
- this is unavoidable.
-
- 3. Use an ordinary printer or typewriter with normal ink/ribbon. No
- handwriting. (Don't cut letters out of magazines--that's almost as
- good as handwriting.)
-
- 4. Send clean photocopies from a really good copy machine. Or a bad
- one with public access like in a drugstore or whatever (wear dark
- sunglasses & hat).
-
- 5. Don't get fingerprints on the letter/envelope. Use a wet sponge for
- sealing the envelope & attaching the stamp.
-
- 6. Mail it from downtown of a big city so the postmark isn't incriminating.
- Be somewhere far away you can document before and after postmark time.
- The idea is to throw doubt on whether you could have done it; someone
- else can mail it for you when you're in Hawaii.
-
-
- wallyk@tekfdi.fdi.tek.com (Wally Kramer) 503 627 2363
- Software Contractor from Step Technology, Inc. 503 244 1239
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dave Mc Mahan <claris!netcom!mcmahan@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Date: 16 May 90 18:51:51 GMT
- Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System
-
-
- Yes, I have experienced this same response during my tenure at
- (deleted) Corp, a large aerospace and defense contractor. What
- happened to you is unfortunate, but not that uncommon. Unfortunately,
- boredom doesn't count too high on the reasons for doing such things.
- The bottom line is that you probably did bend/break more than a few
- rules that you knew you shouldn't, and you knew it when you did it. I
- did. Motivation adds light to the picture, but doesn't change any of
- the things you did.
-
- >I feel the need to let them know about the gaping (and I mean gaping)
- >computer and physical security holes they have, but I'm not sure about
- >the best way to approach it (or even if I should).
-
- Such systems usually do have craters (not holes) in the security setup
- when they exist. It's all a function of how intelligent the system
- administrator is. It also reflects somewhat on the managment policy.
- (Mr. Manager says, "I thought Fred was in charge of that. I'm sure
- Fred would change it if he thought it was a problem." Fred says, "I
- just work here. I don't set policy. If they want a secure system,
- they need to tell me.")
-
- >Just to give you an idea of the scope of the security problems, here's
- >a couple:
-
- [ 4 easy-to-violate security problems deleted ]
-
- >How do you think I should approach it? The person that is
- >administering the system knows very little about Unix system admin, so
- >they rely on the company they bought the system from (this company
- >provides the whole billing system). Should I stick my neck out and
- >write them a letter, or should I just drop the situation?
-
- Well, what is the system used for? If it is just a general tool and
- is not counted on as a required part of operations, I guess that it
- isn't that important. If it is used for billing or contains sensative
- information, they have a much bigger problem. It appears that they DO
- use it for billing, but this wasn't highly apparent from your original
- post. If I was you, I'd wait about three or four months (go find
- another job, you have to eat), and then call the personnel dept. and
- ask for a copy of your employee record. Read it carefully so you know
- what they may be telling those who call for references and security
- clearances. Other than that, don't do anything. A letter from a
- disgruntled former employee isn't going to be taken strongly by anyone
- who will do something. It will always be 'business as usual'.
-
- Follow Patrick's advice, and let it drop. I hope you learned some
- valuable lessons. I know I did in my version of this story. In the
- future, don't lie about why you parted with the company, but don't
- make an obvious point about providing information as to what happened.
- If someone asks and you trust them, tell them the whole story.
-
- Otherwise, let the incident grow old and move on. Just remember that
- you have to trust who you tell. People have very big mouths and long
- memories for this kind of saga. Not that it is something to hide, but
- it is (at least, for me) a sensative part of my past that most won't
- understand and don't really need to know about.
-
- >In the back of my mind I'm kind of afraid that there may be
- >security problems later, and that the finger may come pointing at me.
-
- I wouldn't worry about finger pointing. There isn't much of anything
- you can do that would be effective, so let it drop.
-
-
- -dave
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 15:36:49 CDT
- From: Steve Wolfson <motcid!marble!wolfson@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
-
-
- Personally I don't think you owe them anything but if you really want
- to let them know, then perhaps if you have a friend in the
- organization who could point this info out to them. But again, they
- might accuse your friend of looking where he or she wasn't supposed to
- be and fire your friend.
-
- Since they canned you just for looking, I suspect they aren't going to
- be grateful to you for pointing out the security problems. Sounds
- like the management believes in security by keeping people in the
- dark, which never really works very well. You've already had enough
- grief, don't risk any more by being nice and setting yourself to be
- put between a rock and a hard place.
-
-
- Stephen Wolfson E-Mail: ...!uunet!motcid!wolfsons
- Motorola Cellular or
- 1501 W. Shure Dr. IL27-1155 wolfson@mot.com
- Arlington Heights, IL
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Rabinovitch Isaac <claris!netcom!ergo@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Date: 16 May 90 18:12:51 GMT
- Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 249-0290}
-
-
- (Moderator suggested walking away, and ignoring it.)
-
- Alas, it ain't that simple. Even if they can't *prove* Mr. Someone's
- guilt in subsequent "vandalism", that doesn't prevent them from
- accussing him. ("DISGRUNTLED FORMER EMPLOYEE VANDALIZES EQUIPMENT.")
- These accusations can lead to equipment confiscation, criminal charges
- (which can be expensive, even if they don't stand up in court) and
- what amounts to blacklisting. And if they *do* get in trouble, it's
- very likely that they *will* go after him. In my experience, computer
- centers with inept and/or inadequate security always give more
- priority to finding someone to who can be plausibly threatened (before
- the fact) or accused (after the fact) then actually attempting to fix
- the original security problem. After all, they're innocent victims,
- right?
-
- I'm not sure there are any really good solutions for someone who can't
- convince anybody that the Emperor is naked. I've found myself in a
- similar situation, and was lucky not to lose my job for "defending"
- vandalism. (Sorry, I don't care to post the details.) If I ever got
- in such a situation again, I'd probably just carefully document all
- the security holes, and send copies to all relevant parties, includes
- the law enforcement people. That way, at least "malice" would be hard
- to establish once the unmentionable substances became airborne.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #353
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa10699;
- 17 May 90 3:05 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa12131;
- 17 May 90 0:49 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ac07519;
- 16 May 90 23:45 CDT
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 23:06:21 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #355
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005162306.ab07750@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 16 May 90 23:06:00 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 355
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Press "1" Now [Steve Baumgarten]
- Re: Press "1" Now [Ronald L. Fletcher]
- Re: AOSs, COCOTs and Hotels [Craig R. Watkins]
- Re: Area 908 Prefix Listings [Carl Moore]
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [Richard Kovalcik]
- Re: Questions About Ultraphone 100 [James Blocker]
- Re: Auto-Collect From Payphone [Rob Warnock]
- Re: I Have No Default Long Distance Carrier [Alex Pournelle]
- Re: AT&T "Excellence" [Peter Weiss]
- Re: Interesting DMS Trick [Douglas Mason]
- Re: Pricing vrs. Cost of Touch-tone Service [Ronald L. Fletcher]
- 900-PREVIEW [Carl Moore]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed May 16 10:41:30 1990
- From: Steve Baumgarten <baumgart@esquire.dpw.com>
- Reply-To: baumgart@esquire.dpw.com
- Subject: Re: Press "1" Now
-
-
- Gary Korenek (korenek@ficc.ferranti.com) writes:
-
- > For me, versatility makes things a wee bit (or more) harder. So if
- > technology begats versatility, then we are saying the same thing.
-
- > If something is versatile, then you have to know how to make the thing
- > do what *you* want it to do. Lots of options (buttons to push, codes
- > to punch in, things to memorize or know where to look up).
-
- > It's a tradeoff. We get products that have more bang-for-the-buck
- > (than previous). And, we have to learn (and remember) how to use it.
-
- Although I understand what you're getting at, I can't agree with your
- conclusion. I think you're making the common mistake of assuming that
- a wealth of options necessitates a confusing and non-intuitive user
- interface.
-
- To take an example from the computer world, the Macintosh provides
- much more power and many more options to the novice user than does a
- traditional PC or mainframe, yet it is considerably easier to use and
- understand than either.
-
- Small changes to the user interface of any complicated piece of
- equipment (be it computer, telephone, car radio, etc.) can make a
- significant difference in how a user perceives it. How many of us
- have fumbled with a poorly designed car radio, cursing the poor and
- confusing layout of the controls (which are frequently clustered in an
- illogical or confusing manner, or made smaller than necessary for
- "aesthetic" reasons)?
-
- We recently had a brand new Dictaphone system installed in our office,
- and since the system is all digital, it provides many more features
- than did the original, tape-based, model. The units themselves also
- look almost exactly like a standard office telephone, and they work on
- a standard PBX system (two big pluses).
-
- But the secretaries found it much more difficult and frustrating to
- use than they did the old system, for the most part because Dictaphone
- did not spend enough time on the system's user interface.
-
- Fortunately, Dictaphone is a very responsive company and have been
- very willing to work with us to get their system to the point that the
- instructions to use it have been reduced to a few brief sentences.
- Our secretaries are now much more comfortable using the system, and
- training has become all but unnecessary.
-
- > It's my choice that I do not make full use of the phone system's
- > capabilities (here at work), and of my answering machine at home. I
- > know the basics of what it takes to operate them. I can remember
- > that. :-)
-
- Sadly this is all too often the case. But especially with things like
- telephones (technology that we use every day), people should not have
- to put up with inferior or annoying user interfaces, or forgo many
- useful features simply because they can't remember how to use them.
-
- The definitive book in this area is Donald Norman's "The Psychology of
- Everyday Things", in which he discusses at great length all of the
- terrible things designers can do to make conceptually simple objects
- (from telephones to cars to bathroom fixtures) nearly impossible for
- average people to use with any consistent degree of success.
-
- Had Toshiba asked *anyone* to test their system before releasing it,
- they would have heard about the lack of dialing feedback and about how
- annoying it is. Now that the product has been released, all they can
- do is sit back and lose sales while they think of a way to correct the
- problem.
-
-
- Steve Baumgarten
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- baumgart@esquire.dpw.com
- cmcl2!esquire!baumgart
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 12:51:42 EDT
- From: Ronald L Fletcher <rlf@mtgzy.att.com>
- Subject: Re: Press "1" Now
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- One voice response system I didn't see listed is actually a very
- useful one. It is Western Digital's technical hotline at
- 1-800-832-4778 This system will walk you through a disk
- problem/installation procedure (provided you are using their
- controllers). It is a pretty detailed system as it includes info on
- all their controllers and suggested settings (interleaves and such)
- for many of the most popular drives. It even says things like, "Check
- the number on your controller now, the system will disconnect, to
- return to this point in the procedure dial *22 (or somesuch number) at
- the initial voice prompt." We found it really quite helpful when we
- were doing a disk upgrade about 10 PM one night.
-
-
- Ron Fletcher
- att!mtgzy!rlf
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Craig R. Watkins" <CRW@icf.hrb.com>
- Subject: Re: AOSs, COCOTs and Hotels
- Date: 16 May 90 14:21:12 EST
- Organization: HRB Systems
-
-
- I do a lot of 800 calling from hotels. Some charge the same for 800
- as local calls; some don't. One tip that I've learned:
-
- Often hotels tell you to dial 9 for local and 8 for long distance.
- Usually, it seems that 800 calls will go out on either. More than one
- hotel that I have stayed at has charged the local call charge (eg
- $0.50 - $0.95) for 800 calls placed on the 9-lines, but has not
- charged for them when dialed on the 8-lines.
-
- Of course it's all in the programming and the situation may actually
- be reversed at some properties, however I'll stick to dialing 8 myself.
-
- Remember as you leave your hotel room to grab the comment card so you
- can tell the hotel what you think of their phone charges on the flight
- home ...
-
-
- Craig R. Watkins Internet: CRW@ICF.HRB.COM
- HRB Systems, Inc. Bitnet: CRW%HRB@PSUECL
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 13:48:30 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Re: Area 908 Prefix Listings
-
-
- Inclusion of Elizabeth means that 908 would reach up at least to exit
- 13 of the New Jersey Turnpike; I also see Roselle, Unionville,
- Carteret, Rahway, and Woodbridge in 908. When I get around to it, I
- can print out the list and mail it to Pilot Books in Babylon, N.Y.;
- they are publisher of the zip-area code directory referred to
- recently.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Richard Kovalcik <rk@athena.mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
- Reply-To: Richard Kovalcik <rk@athena.mit.edu>
- Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 19:34:02 GMT
-
-
- A builder I trust says that he always pulls two quad phone cables. He
- says that running two lines on one quad or 6-wire cable leads to cross
- talk. This is something you might want to consider ...
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 14:32:15 CDT
- From: James Blocker <blocker%rebel.@sun.com>
- Subject: Re: Questions About Ultraphone 100
-
-
- In article <7449@accuvax.nwu.edu> georgep@vice.ico.tek.com (George
- Pell) writes:
-
- >Does anyone have any information on the "Ultraphone 100" system?
-
- Back in 1983-1984, when I was still working for United Technologies, I
- did some work on a project called "Ultraphone". We were to supply a
- small switch (actually a 250-line PBX) to be used with a rural radio
- telephone system being developed by other companies. The names of the
- companies escape me now, but I believe that International Mobile
- Machines was one of the players at the time.
-
- Your other details (430 - 477 MHz antenna and used in Oregon) would be
- consistent with the project I worked on.
-
- >Is this system digital, and therefore relatively secure? What else
- >can anyone tell me about it.
-
- Our switch and the telephones connected to it were digital. The voice
- channel was standard 64kbps u-law PCM; a separate control channel
- operating at 8kbps was also employed.
-
- If in fact this system is the same one that I worked on, it is
- relatively secure due to the fact of it being digital. Even though no
- scrambling technique was involved, a normal UHF receiver would be
- incapable of demodulating the digital transmission.
-
- I left United Technologies while this project was going on.
- Unfortunately, I don't know what happened to it, but it sounds like
- the one I had worked on for awhile.
-
-
- Jim Blocker (KF5IW)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 03:02:45 GMT
- From: Rob Warnock <rpw3%rigden.wpd@sgi.com>
- Subject: Re: Auto-Collect From Payphone
- Reply-To: Rob Warnock <rpw3@sgi.com>
- Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc., Mountain View, CA
-
-
- In article <7782@accuvax.nwu.edu> MCL9337@tamvenus.bitnet writes:
-
- | While traipsing through a Texaco today, I needed to place a collect
- | call to a company... they would require... who I needed to talk to...
- | The phone plays it back for me ... "Your name is ... (me recorded
- | digitally and very nicely I might add) 'Mark Lowe.'"
- | The connection is then made ... and the lady who answers must have
- | thought it was a joke! The voice said "You are receiving a collect
- | call. To accept, enter 1; to refuse, enter 0 and hang up."
-
- I suspect that what the other party hears is in fact, "You are
- receiving a collect call from [in your voice] 'Mark Lowe'. To accept,
- enter 1; to refuse, enter 0 and hang up."
-
- So try giving your name as "Mark Lowe, calling Department Foo". If you
- say it fast enough and run together, it may work.
-
- (It's legal, as you aren't trying to evade the toll by using the
- covert channel to pass your actual message.)
-
-
- Rob Warnock, MS-9U/510 rpw3@sgi.com rpw3@pei.com
- Silicon Graphics, Inc. (415)335-1673 Protocol Engines, Inc.
- 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd.
- Mountain View, CA 94039-7311
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Alex Pournelle <elroy!grian!alex@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: I Have No Default Long Distance Carrier
- Organization: Workman & Associates
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 08:34:34 GMT
-
-
- Brian Litzinger <brian@apt.bungi.com> writes:
-
- > My home has no default long distance carrier. When I dial a 1+ or 0+
- > long distance call I get a non-discript message that doesn't really
- > say anything is wrong. Just that things aren't working and that I
- > should call my long distance carrier.
-
- > And besides, now the less informed can't make long distance calls from
- > my home.
-
- Umm, do they still charge you for that "optional" "non-basic"
- long-distance tariff? Now, is it just me, or would this kind of
- billing throw lawsuits around the magistrate's corner office in any
- other field? Yeah, the basic rate is $9.00 or whatever per month--but
- you can't have it without the ($3 and climbing) long-distance add-on!
-
- Or am I wrong -- and there is a way, with enough patience and coaching
- of the P*bell 811-SUCKERS girls, to order up a "local only" line?
-
-
- Alex Pournelle, freelance thinker
- Also: Workman & Associates, Data recovery for PCs, Macs, others
- ...elroy!grian!alex; BIX: alex; voice: (818) 791-7979
- fax: (818) 794-2297 bbs: 791-1013; 8N1 24/12/3
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Penn State University
- Date: Wednesday, 16 May 1990 05:41:29 EDT
- From: Peter Weiss <PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Subject: Re: AT&T "Excellence"
-
-
- In article <7785@accuvax.nwu.edu>, drilex!carols@husc6.harvard.edu (Carol
- Springs) says:
-
- >At the end of the call, she asked, "And would you say that I gave you
- >excellent service this evening?" I said "Yes" to avoid any hassle.
-
- I wonder if her supervisor was listening in on (oops, monitoring) the
- conversation?
-
-
- /Pete
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Douglas Mason <douglas@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: Interesting DMS Trick
- Reply-To: douglas@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Douglas Mason)
- Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Wheeling, IL
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 12:29:53 GMT
-
-
- Speaking of interesting phone tricks, I stumbled upon another that I
- have found other people to have discovered, too. This is actually a
- little more dirty than the beforementioned tricks, and not meant to be
- a "feature" I am sure!
-
- Under the ESS#2 switch I was, I had call-waiting. I was talking to a
- friend that was local and during the conversation her call waiting
- went off. She went and answered it and I waited in limbo on the
- "other line". Well, she was gone for several minutes.
-
- While she was gone, MY call waiting went off and I answered it. So
- now she is on HER other line, and I am on MY "other line", while both
- of us are still connected. I hung up with my call, switched back over
- and suddenly I was IN her conversation!
-
- So, we played around and learned this little trick:
-
- - Call someone up that you know has call waiting and is in the midst of a
- conversation.
-
- - When the answer, ask for someone non-existant or simply sit there mute.
- Eventually they will hang up and switch over to the other conversation,
- except you aren't really "hung up", you are merely in limbo.
-
- - Using a second phone line, call yourself. Answer you call waiting then
- switch back. You are now in the called party conversation!
-
- Life IS stranger than fiction. Further playing around revealed that
- this worked only locally (no big suprise) but it DID work in many
- other areas with simular switches!
-
- Can anyone explain this occurance?
-
-
- Douglas T. Mason | douglas@ddsw1.UUCP or dtmason@m-net |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 12:29:48 EDT
- From: Ronald L Fletcher <rlf@mtgzy.att.com>
- Subject: Re: Pricing vrs. Cost of Touch-tone Service
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- Just of couple of notes on the TT thread:
-
- If you have a tone phone and go off-hook and you press a button and
- hear both dialtone and the touch-tone frequency, yet you cannot break
- dialtone, this is not a tip and ring (red and green) reversal problem.
- The tones dont care about polarity as they are AC and will be heard by
- the CO as long as they can be generated by the phone. The tip and
- ring reversal (rip and ting) is only a problem in those older phones
- that do not have a polarity guard circuit. The polarity guard circuit
- ensures the tone generator in the phone gets the correct polarity to
- generate the tones. The reversal problem is identifiable by a
- distinctive clicking sound and the muting of the dialtone heard in the
- receiver when you press a key on the TT pad (and dialtone is not
- broken).
-
- The former problem is caused by the CO not having a TTR (Touch Tone
- Receiver) enabled for your loop (or of course the CO does not offer TT
- service). Many CO's can enable or disable the TTR's on a line by line
- basis. Here in NJ (notably the Brunswick areas: New,East,South) NJB
- has seen fit to disable the TTR's on loops where the billing does not
- include the $1.10 charge for TT service. We discovered this when a
- relative who had been getting the free TT service had it stop working
- all of a sudden in August of 1989. The relative called me and I said
- swap the red and green wires, he said now it just clicks. I said call
- NJB, he did and NJB said something to the tune of, "We are conducting
- an audit of our rotary customers, would you like TT service added? It
- is only an additional $1.10 per month."
-
- I always wondered just how profitable this audit turned out to be as a
- number of people who told me this happened to them "just said no" and
- switched back to rotary (or pulse) dialing. So NJB didn't get the
- $1.10 and the CO switch gets to spend more time processing their
- calls.
-
-
- Ron Fletcher
- att!mtgzy!rlf
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 11:15:57 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: 900-PREVIEW
-
-
- 900-PREVIEW is a motion-picture preview. The initial menu says to
- touch 1 on touch-tone phone or dial 2 on a rotary phone. (Hadn't
- heard of options like that before; I have heard of "stay on the line"
- for rotary phone.)
-
- To select a movie, you're to punch in the first three letters of the
- title. And it does account for Q and Z; it says to punch one for
- those letters. (Between one and one-half and two years ago, this
- Digest mentioned a phone poll regarding U.S. vice-presidential
- candidates Bentsen and Quayle, and people were told to press B or Q,
- respectively. That poll was rendered invalid because telephone
- keypads [also dials] have no Q.)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #355
- ******************************
-
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa11664;
- 17 May 90 3:30 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa04598;
- 17 May 90 1:54 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab12131;
- 17 May 90 0:50 CDT
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 0:07:22 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #356
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005170007.ab24828@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Thu, 17 May 90 00:07:09 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 356
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- London Code Split [Nigel Whitfield]
- The Bounders! [Nigel Whitfield]
- Phone Conferences [Kevin Ashford]
- Interoffice Trunk Signaling Methods [Larry Lippman]
- Verification of Numbers Furnished to ONI [Larry Lippman]
- Online CCITT Standards [Mark C. Lowe]
- I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Daniel Jacobson]
- Proposed 900 Block and Operator Call Complete [Thomas Lapp]
- 950 Numbers in Canada [Marcel D. Mongeon]
- Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing [Peter J. Dotzauer]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: Nigel Whitfield <nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk>
- Subject: London Code Split
- Date: 15 May 90 14:59:32 BST (Tue)
- From: Nigel Whitfield <nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk>
-
-
- Well, it happened more or less as planned, complete with one of the
- most pointless television programmes that I have ever had the
- misfortune to watch.
-
- Both old and new codes were working in parallel for a time before the
- split, and on the morning after, I did a few checks. This is what
- happened:
-
- All long distance calls to 01 were being intercepted with a message
- telling people to use the correct code, though it didn't say which
- code to use.
-
- Calls from my 861 number (081 area) could be placed to local numbers
- in the normal way.
-
- Calls to 240, 388, 831 and 409 (all 071) could be placed without using
- the new code.
-
- A call from Kew Gardens (081) to Fulham 385 (071) was placed on the
- Sunday afternoon without needing a code.
-
- Calling from 861 to 403 without a code resulted in a failed call, with
- no recorded message. 403 is in the City area, close to London Bridge.
-
- Monday afternoon it was necessary to use a code when calling from
- Leicester Square (071) to 861 and 460 numbers. Failure to use a code
- generated an intercept message.
-
- From Wednesday, all calls that I attempted to make across the
- boundary failed.
-
- So, it looks like the cut-over was not as sudden as BT would have had
- us believe, but then that's BT for you.....
-
- Hope I've got all those numbers right - I don't have a list with me.
-
-
- Nigel Whitfield 120 Canterbury Road
- nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk Harrow, HA1 4PB
- n.whitfield@cc.ic.ac.uk 081-861 5106
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: Nigel Whitfield <nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk>
- Subject: The Bounders!
- Date: 15 May 90 15:13:10 BST (Tue)
- From: Nigel Whitfield <nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk>
-
-
- Since I'm at a bit of a loose end at the moment, I thought I'd jot
- down a few things about those lovable (!?!) rogues at British Telecom
- to entertain and inform the readers of the Digest.
-
- Until fairly recently, it was possible to walk up to most modern BT
- payphones around London (and apparently elsewhere) and tap 131 to
- access Mercury. The phones would then switch to tone dialling if they
- weren't already set up to do so, allowing you to key in your Mercury
- access code and make calls that would appear on your monthly
- statement.
-
- Almost all the payphones that I have tried to do this on lately have
- been modified so that the keypad is disabled once you dial 131, and
- the signal tone given as if you'd called the operator, making it
- rather difficult to use Mercury from a BT payphone. It is not possible
- to use your Mercury account from a Mercury payphone.
-
- Payphones in pubs, restaurants and other off-street locations can
- still be used in this way, but the number seems to be dwindling.
-
- The {London Evening Standard} reported recently that BT have withdrawn
- their tone generating keypads from sale because of a loophole that
- allowed people to use them to make free calls from coinboxes. I don't
- know what this loophole was, but the Standard reported it as simply
- having to press two digits.
-
- Finally, the well worn and to my mind untruthful BT slogan "It's you
- we answer to." Hmmm. Wandering High Street Kensington one day, I came
- across a pen that had been dropped. It bore the British Telecom logo,
- and a slogan, which seems to be more indicative of the way they
- conduct themselves that the usual advertising - "British Telecom -
- Calling For Profit".
-
- Well, that's enough rambling for now. I could moan about BT for
- ages....
-
-
- Nigel Whitfield 120 Canterbury Road
- nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk Harrow, HA1 4PB
- n.whitfield@cc.ic.ac.uk 081-861 5106
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: maverick@pnet01.cts.com (Kevin Ashford)
- Subject: Phone Conferences
- Date: 15 May 90 20:36:02 GMT
- Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA
-
-
- Hello,
-
- I would like to put together a list of 'phone confrences' or 'talk
- lines'. Anyone who has telephone numbers to such systems, please email
- them to me and I will post the numbers back to the group all at once.
-
- I'm not intrested in 976/900 numbers; only 1-800 or 1-areacode numbers.
-
- Thanks,
-
- Kevin
-
- UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd ucsd nosc}!crash!pnet01!maverick
- ARPA: crash!pnet01!maverick@nosc.mil
- INET: maverick@pnet01.cts.com
- AT&T: (800) 674-8315 [VoiceMail System]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Interoffice Trunk Signaling Methods
- Date: 15 May 90 23:16:44 EDT (Tue)
- From: Larry Lippman <kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- In article <7706@accuvax.nwu.edu> amb@hudson.cs.columbia.edu (Andrew
- Boardman) writes:
-
- > When calling many places in 212 from many places in 914 (I know it's
- > vague, but it's not dependent on switch type or location or time of
- > day; maybe traffic patterns...?) some of the background noise one
- > hears from switching is the 212 number, without 212 prepended, being
- > pulsed out *very* fast. I've always wondered why... Any ideas?
-
- I do not have enough information to address the specific
- instances which you describe, but I can offer some general comments
- which most likely apply to what you have observed - which was probably
- unmuted impulse noise from DC interoffice trunk signaling.
-
- While many people think of interoffice trunk signaling in
- terms of MF, T1-carrier or CCIS, in which case tone or digital (i.e.,
- out of band) signaling is used to transport the four or more
- terminating digits of the called number, signaling methods are still
- in use which send dial pulses. In many metropolitan areas interoffice
- trunks exist as individual *metallic* circuits without the benefit of
- T1 or other carrier apparatus. Under these circumstances, especially
- in older XBAR offices, various DC signaling schemes will be utilized
- on these trunks. New York City is a prime example where some CO's are
- only a mile or two apart; the least expensive interoffice trunks would
- therefore be simple two-wire metallic circuits.
-
- Older metallic interoffice trunks often employ dial pulses at
- 10 or 20 pps to convey the four or more terminating digits of call.
- Various DC signaling systems have been employed to establish a line
- discipline for on-hook/off-hook status, dial pulse transmission, and
- answer supervision. Such DC signaling systems include, but are not
- limited to:
-
- 1. Loop Reverse Battery Signaling is used on one-way trunks only,
- and is similar to subscriber loop dial pulsing. Seizure at
- the calling office consists of a loop closure in series with
- a supervisory relay which operates on loop reversal returned
- by the called office when the called party answers. Loop
- Reverse Battery Signaling is somewhat limited in loop
- resistance range.
-
- 2. Battery and Ground Pulsing is used for greater loop range.
- It is similar to (1) above, except that during pulsing the
- calling office trunk circuit switches the loop between ground
- and resistance battery, effectively doubling the available
- loop current to operate the "A" pulsing relay in the called
- office trunk circuit. Answer supervision is made through
- loop reversal as in (1) above.
-
- 3. High-Low Reverse Battery Signaling is similar to (1) above,
- but a sensitive polar relay is used at the calling office
- to not only detect answer supervision, but to indicate
- that the trunk is out of service due to loop failure or
- an intentional make-busy condition at the called office.
-
- 4. Reverse Battery High-Low Signaling, similar to but *not* to
- be confused with (3) above, is primarily used on DSA and TSPS
- circuits when a subscriber places an operator-assisted call.
-
- 5. DX signaling uses a balanced differential current scheme and
- results in the creation of E&M leads at both ends. DX signaling
- can be used on both 2-wire and 4-wire circuits. It should be
- pointed out that E&M lead signaling is short range signaling
- which is *only* used within the confines of a central office.
- What is commonly referred to as E&M lead signaling really uses
- other means (such as a DX set or SF signaling unit) to derive
- the actual E&M leads. DX signaling can be used on metallic
- circuits of a dozen or more miles in length.
-
- 6. As a point of historical interest only since all panel apparatus
- has now gone to the Central Office in the Sky :-), another
- type of pulsing known as revertive pulsing was used between
- panel and other types of CO's. Revertive pulsing was, well,
- *different*. The calling office would seize the trunk, and
- would count pulses sent back to it from the panel office until
- the correct number was received, at which it would tell the
- called office to stop. This start-stop sequence would be
- repeated for each digit.
-
- In non-common control SxS and XY CO's the dial pulses sent
- over the above signaling methods were generated by the subscriber
- dial. In all other CO's the signaling pulses were created at either
- 10 or 20 pps by means of a outgoing sender. All ESS offices have the
- capability of sending DC signaling for the above type of trunks.
-
-
- Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. "Have you hugged your cat today?"
- UUCP: {boulder|decvax|rutgers|watmath}!acsu.buffalo.edu!kitty!larry
- TEL: 716/688-1231 || FAX: 716/741-9635 {utzoo|uunet}!/ \aerion!larry
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Verification of Numbers Furnished to ONI
- Date: 15 May 90 23:36:51 EDT (Tue)
- From: Larry Lippman <kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- In article <7756@accuvax.nwu.edu> johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us
- (John R. Levine) writes:
-
- > My aunt at the family telco in rural Vermont has told me that
- > subscribers who lied to ONI were always a problem, particularly
- > teenaged kids.
-
- There *is* a verification system of sorts which has been
- implemented to deter ONI "fibbing" :-).
-
- It has been almost twenty years since I saw such an
- installation at a Late Great Bell System facility, so details are a
- bit fuzzy. However, when the ONI operator keypulsed the digits into
- the CAMA entry position, a special outgoing verification trunk would
- dial the number in the originating CO. If the number tested busy,
- then the call "passed". If the number did NOT test busy, the test
- failed and the ONI operator would challenge the caller. The given
- number - if false and not busy - did not ring when dialed by the
- special verification circuit, however.
-
- Obviously, if a false number were given and it happened to be
- busy at the time, the verification test would be satisfied. However,
- such incidence was rare enough that a deterrent effect was created.
-
- I do not know what percentage of ONI circuits were equipped
- with the above verification feature. Those independent operating
- telephone companies with whom I am familiar and which utilized AT&T
- DSA, CAMA and toll facilities and which also had ONI never had such
- ONI verification circuits.
-
-
- Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. "Have you hugged your cat today?"
- UUCP: {boulder|decvax|rutgers|watmath}!acsu.buffalo.edu!kitty!larry
- TEL: 716/688-1231 || FAX: 716/741-9635 {utzoo|uunet}!/ \aerion!larry
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 01:41 CDT
- From: MCL9337@tamvenus.bitnet
- Subject: Online CCITT Standards
-
-
- This request has been made by myself and others with no results. Are
- there absolutely NO FTPable CCITT standards? Someone somewhere must
- know! It's a quest...
-
-
- Mark C. Lowe - KB5III
-
- MCL9337@TAMVENUS.BITNET
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 22:04:02 CDT
- From: Daniel Jacobson <danj1@ihlpa.att.com>
- Subject: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Reply-To: Dan_Jacobson@att.com
- Organization: AT&T-BL, Naperville IL, USA
-
-
- Say I live in areacode 708 (Suburban Chicago). I program up my phone
- with lots of Chicago numbers (1-312-XXX-XXXX). One day me and phone
- go and spend the week at uncle Billy's in Chicago. Now I got to
- reprogram my phone to edit out all those 1-312 areacodes if I want the
- phone to work there [or else listen to the helpful recording]. Isn't
- that dumb?
-
-
- Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM +1-708-979-6364
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Are you saying eleven digit dialing should be
- mandatory throughout 312/708, even for the folks who make all/most of
- their calls on one side or the other, or are you saying eleven digit
- dialing intra-areacode should be optional, with telco absorbing the
- first four digits (1-312 or 1-708) when they are not needed? PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 20:32:02 EDT
- From: Thomas Lapp <thomas%mvac23.uucp@udel.edu>
- Subject: Proposed 900 Block and Operator Call Complete
-
- In the Public Notices section of the {Wilmington (DE) News-Journal}
- there was an interesting item by Diamond State Telephone.
-
- One proposal was a 900 block where you could ask them to block all 900
- calls from your line. The price was free to install it, and free to
- reinstate it. However, after that there was a non-recurring fee of
- $40/$120 (res/bus) to change it after that. Seems rather fair to me.
-
- The other proposal was a service that if you called DA for a number,
- you could ask them to go ahead and connect you after looking the
- number up. Cost will be $0.30 per call.
-
- - tom
-
- internet : mvac23!thomas@udel.edu or thomas%mvac23@udel.edu
- uucp : {ucbvax,mcvax,psuvax1,uunet}!udel!mvac23!thomas
- Europe Bitnet: THOMAS1@GRATHUN1 Location: Newark, DE, USA
- Quote : The only way to win thermonuclear war is not to play.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: root@joymrmn.UUCP (Marcel D. Mongeon)
- Subject: 950 Numbers in Canada
- Date: 16 May 90 14:53:47 GMT
- Organization: The Joymarmon Group Inc.
-
-
- I have frequently seen mention of 950 telephone numbers. Up here in
- Canada, because we have yet to discover alternate long distance
- service, they don't really mean anything (I think).
-
- Can some of these 950 numbers be dialed over an 800 number? If so,
- would someone mind sending me or posting a list of all of the
- different 800-950 numbers. I would like to see if these can be dialed
- from Canada. If they are, I can then get a family member to subscribe
- to one of them for me and then use an alternate carrier.
-
- Thanks.
-
- ||| Marcel D. Mongeon
- ||| e-mail: ... (uunet, maccs)!joymrmn!root or
- ||| joymrmn!marcelm
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Peter J. Dotzauer" <pjd@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu>
- Subject: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing?
- Date: 16 May 90 15:06:41 GMT
- Organization: Ohio State Univ IRCC
-
-
- Is there a device that can be connected to a telephone or a telephone
- line that causes a light bulb to blink, whenever the telephone rings?
-
- This way, one will not miss a call when he has his headphones on.
- Also, such a device would be useful for people with hearing problems.
-
-
- Peter J Dotzauer, Analyt. Cartography & GIS, Dept. Geography, OSU, Columbus, OH
- TEL (614) 292-1357 FAX (614) 292-6213 FIDO 1:226/330
- BITNET pjd@ohstvmb UUCP ...!osu-cis!hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu!pjd
- INTERNET pjd+@osu.edu or pjd@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu [128.146.1.5]
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Radio Shack has various devices like this, as do
- most telephone supply catalogs, and phone center stores. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #356
- ******************************
-
- Received: from [129.105.5.103] by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa14717;
- 17 May 90 4:48 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa10858;
- 17 May 90 2:58 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab04598;
- 17 May 90 1:54 CDT
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 1:13:04 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #357
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005170113.ab27284@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Thu, 17 May 90 01:12:24 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 357
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Voice Information Services [Andrew H. Colby]
- Re: 917 Area Code [New York Times via Carl Moore]
- Re: 900-STOPPER [Douglas Scott Reuben]
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [Mark Earle]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 11:17:52 EDT
- From: Andrew H Colby <ahc@lcuxlm.att.com>
- Subject: Re: Voice Information Services
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Liberty Corner, NJ, USA
-
-
- On 13 May 90 18:32:16 GMT well!fgk@well.sf.ca.us (Frank G Kienast) wrote:
-
- > A couple weeks ago, I posted an article stating that I wanted to (for
- > fun) compile a list of voice information services that can be accessed
- > using a touch-tone phone. I received the following responses. Thanks
- > to everyone who contributed. My two favorites are the [San Francisco
-
- I must have missed Frank's original posting, but in Hunterdon County,
- New Jersey (served by United Telephone System, not New Jersey Bell)
- there is a free service listed in the phone book called ``Talking
- Fingers.'' The service is run by DirectoriesAmerica, Inc. To access
- it call (201)236-7000 (from a touch-tone phone). The following codes
- are available:
-
- General
- 1000 Help
-
- News and Financial
- 1210 National News Update 1212 International News Update
- 1220 Business News Headlines 1222 Stock Market Report
- 1223 Bond Market Report 1224 NYSE Stock Report
- 1226 Tax Tips 1228 Investment Line
-
- Lottery
- 1110 New Jersey 1120 New York
- 1130 Pennsylvania
-
- Weather
- 1603 Local (Hunterdon County, NJ) 1699 National
- 1599 Allentown 1600 Atlanta
- 1610 Baltimore 1615 Boston
- 1620 Chicago 1647 Kansas City
- 1650 Los Angeles 1655 Miami
- 1660 New York City 1665 Philadelphia
- 1695 Washington, D.C.
-
- Sports
- 1300 National Sports Brief 1320 NFL Report
- 1325 NBA Report 1330 Major League Baseball
- 1350 NCAA Top 25 Scoreboard 1352 Local (Hunterdon County) Sport
- 1360 Sportsworld Trivia
-
- Soap Opera Updates
- 1800 All My Children 1805 Another World
- 1810 As the World Turns 1815 The Bold and the Beautiful
- 1820 Days of Our Lives 1825 General Hospital
- 1830 Guiding Light 1835 Loving
- 1840 One Life to Live 1845 Generations
- 1850 Santa Barbara 1855 The Young and the Restless
- 1860 Dallas 1865 Dynasty
- 1870 Falcon Crest 1875 Knots Landing
- 1885 LA Law 1890 Thirtysomething
- 1880 Soap Scene (report on the soap stars)
-
- Horoscopes
- 1715 Interstellar Forecast (Zodiac summary)
- 1700 Is Your Birthday Today? 1701 Aquarius
- 1702 Pisces 1703 Aries
- 1704 Taurus 1705 Gemini
- 1706 Cancer 1707 Leo
- 1708 Virgo 1709 Libra
- 1710 Scorpio 1711 Sagittarius
- 1712 Capricorn
-
- Trivia Corner
- 1360 Sportsworld Trivia 1503 Interactive Trivia
- 1504 What's Hot....What's Not 1505 Hollywood Trivia
- 1507 Historical Trivia
-
- Just for Kids
- 1508 Today's Funny Fact 1509 Joke of the Day
- 1510 Adventure Corner 1513 Story Corner
- 1515 Mr. Knowledge
-
- Music, Video and T.V.
- 1900 Video Review 1905 Hot Video Rentals
- 1910 Hollywood Starline 1915 Rock Tracks
- 1916 Top Ten Singles 1917 Top Ten Albums
- 1925 Top Ten Movies 1926 Movie Reviews
- 1980 This Week on TV 1981 TV Tonight
-
- Regional Attractions
- 1400 Community Calendar 1402 Places to Visit
- 1403 Kid's Community 1405 Area Concert Connection
- 1421 The Meadowlands 1422 Garden State Arts Center
- 1423 Atlantic City Headliners 1540 Baltimore's Inner Harbor
- 1550 New York City Activities/Events 1555 Philadelphia Activities/Events
-
-
- Andrew H. Colby
- e-mail a.h.colby@att.com USmail room 2W-D07
- voice (201)580-5592 184 Liberty Corner Road
- fax (201)580-4028 P.O. Box 4908
- Warren, NJ 07060-0908
-
- I have no connections with New Jersey Bell, United Telephone System,
- or DirectoriesAmerica, Inc., other than as a paying customer.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 13:26:37 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Re: 917 Area Code (New York Times Article)
-
-
- Article starts on page B-1 on April 19, 1990 ("Additional Area Code Is
- Planned In Manhattan") and continues on page B-9 ("Telephone Company
- Plans 917 Area Code for New York City"). It says the new area code is
- coming in about two or three years. Here's the last part of the
- article:
-
- ***
-
- 'Overlay' May Be Costly
-
- One possible solution to the shortage of telephone numbers is to
- assign the addition area code to customers who use cellular phones and
- beepers in the geographical territory served by the 212 code. That
- approach, which is called an "overlay" because the new code would be
- "laid over" the 212 area, would require use of the 917 code for calls
- placed to some customers in the current 212 area code.
-
- But the [Public Service] commission said the overlay system would pose
- technical difficulties for New York Telephone and confuse customers
- who would have to determine the correct area code to reach people who
- live in the Bronx and Manhattan. The "overlay" would also cost more
- to install because the company would have to design a new network --
- within the current 212 one -- for the 917 area code.
-
- Assigning the new area code to the Bronx would solve the problem only
- temporarily, because New York Telephone would soon run out of numbers
- for Manhattan, which is experiencing most of the growth in telephone
- lines, the commission said.
-
- Another possibility would be to split Manhattan and assign one portion
- the 917 area code. Eli Noam, a business professor of Columbia
- University who serves on the commission, said a split of Manhattan by
- area codes would also cause too much confusion.
-
- "You can just imagine what sensitivities we would raise by taking the
- 212 area code away from the East Side and letting it remain on the
- West, or what would happen in a north-south situation," Mr. Noam said.
-
- He said the phone company probably could slow demand for new telephone
- numbers by charging business customers a fee for warehousing numbers
- they do not use. He estimated that there are perhaps "millions of
- telephone numbers assigned to business switchboards that are not being
- used."
-
- ***
-
- END OF ARTICLE. Earlier it notes that "some businesses warehouse
- phone lines and thus numbers in case their companies grow." Also,
- there was some uproar about the 1984 removal of Brooklyn, Queens, and
- Staten Island from the 212 area; I recall reading and hearing about
- the 212 Cafe located in what is now 718, and the song lament ending
- with "When we were 2 1 2." 310 in Los Angeles is planned to be
- geographical; was there also uproar about it?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 16-MAY-1990 15:33:50.39
- From: "DOUGLAS SCOTT REUBEN)" <DREUBEN@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Subject: Re: 900-STOPPER
-
-
- In regard to dialing 1-900-STOPPER to prevent your call from being
- ID'd, aren't there better (and cheaper!) ways to do this?
-
- From what I understand through my limited experience with Caller*ID
- in New Jersey Bell territory, you only get calls from within Jersey
- Bell's service area. So a call from New York City, maybe three miles
- away from the exchange in New Jersey offering CLASS services, will not
- result in a number being displayed. (Assuming the caller used AT&T or
- a LD Company. It *MAY* be displayed if the caller used 10NYT [New York
- Tel] or 10NJB [New Jersey Bell], which have a special agreement by
- which the local companies can carry certain North Jersey - New York
- City area calls. I never got to try this, though...)
-
- Moreover, let's say you make the call with your Bell/AT&T Calling
- Card. From what I've seen, the number you are calling from doesn't
- show, so that's another way to avoid Caller*ID. And note that with
- AT&T's Reach Out America Calling Card Option, callers who have
- accounts with certain BOCs can pay direct-dial (non-Calling Card)
- rates after 10PM for inter-state calls, avoiding the eighty cent
- surcharge. So, EVEN IF all direct dial interstate calls were to show
- up on Caller*ID, if I wanted to make a call and not have my number
- show up (and not pay anything extra), I would wait till 10PM, dial my
- interstate call then, and pay the SAME rate that I would pay for a
- direct dialed call. I would attain the benefits of using
- 1-900-STOPPER (no Caller*ID), but not pay anything close to the cost
- of using it!
-
- Taking this one step further, let's assume that five years from now
- all calls, handled either locally or LD, will show the number via
- Caller*ID. OK, fine, but what if you use MCI , Sprint, Allnet, or some
- small 800 LD company that you can access via 950, 800, or even a local
- access number? Do you think it likely that MCI and Sprint will pass
- the number along from their 950/800 access numbers to the local Bell
- Co. at the receiving end for display on Caller*ID? And even if Sprint
- and MCI do, what about some small, rural LD company that has only a
- local access number?
-
- IE, let's say there's a company called "SmallTel" serving the Truckee,
- CA area. It has a local access number for LD calls made within the
- local Truckee area, and an 800 number so callers can use the service
- while traveling. To use SmallTel, you have to dial the local access
- number (or 800), enter your code, and then enter the destination
- number, very much in the same manner that one would have used MCI or
- Allnet before 1+ and 10XXX access. Would SmallTel want to waste time
- and money getting Caller*ID from the local port, and then pass it on
- to the receiving Bell Co. so the Bell's customers can get Caller*ID?
- Probably not, especially if Caller*ID is not available in the Truckee
- area. (And I'm not sure, but if Truckee is served by GTE then even if
- Caller*ID were available you'd get the wrong number half of the time! :-) )
-
- So all I need do, assuming all the methods above won't work, is get an
- account with SmallTel, then call to SmallTel's local port (at about
- 11.5 cents per minute, night rate AT&T Reach Out) , dial my code, and
- make whatever calls I want without Caller*ID.
-
- Finally, if ALL that doesn't work, and I don't have access to a PBX or
- some sort of system that sends out a "generic" number (or one of a
- group of "generic" numbers) for outgoing calls, I can always take my
- mobile phone out of my service area, wait for the ROAM light to come
- on, and make all the calls I want free of caller ID. (Whenever I ROAM,
- and I make calls from the ROAM area with my calling card, I only get
- the out-dial number of the ROAM port, and not my mobile number.) A bit
- more expensive, but that will work too!
-
- Or, I can use a marine band radio, call the Marine Operator, and place
- the call through her! I wonder what Caller*ID would say then! :-)
-
- So I'm not sure what all the big deal about 1-900-STOPPER is? Unless
- I'm missing something obvious, it would seem to me that there are many
- other alternatives to 900-STOPPER which are either the same price or
- only marginally more expensive than a direct (regular) call which
- would show Caller*ID.
-
-
- Doug
-
- dreuben@eagle.wesleyan.edu
- dreuben@wesleyan.bitnet
- (and just plain old "dreuben" to locals...! :-) )
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 21:11:59 CDT
- From: Mark Earle <mearle@pro-party.cts.com>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
-
-
- I would suggest the following:
-
- In each room (rest rooms, utility closets for the wash machine, and
- any closet big enough to stand in) put a box. I use all plastic boxes,
- and use 3/4" inside diamater plastic white plumbing (cheap) PVC as my
- conduit for these types of jobs.
-
- Anyhow, run conduit from each box to a central closet, or corner of
- basement. As another poster indicated, make sure there is a properly
- wired 110v outlet box, and preferably, it should be on it's own
- circuit breaker. You might ALSO, to the outside somewhere, run two
- number 12 or 14 conductor wires to provide for battery backup. I
- prefer batteries to be outside.
-
- I would use twelve-pair wiring to all boxes in all rooms. Why limit
- yourself? Wire is cheap NOW, compared to ripping things apart THEN.
-
- Also-in each conduit run from a box to the central location, place a
- pull-string (I use the heaviest (60 lb) monofilament fishing line I
- can find). This will let you pull additional wires later with no
- problems (or at least minimal problems)
-
- I would also, in any livable room (non-closets) place, on the wall
- opposite from the box for the phone connections, another box. Put the
- box at about two foot off the floor level. Run four pair wire to
- these. Run these four pairs to the same central location. From these
- two foot boxes, run pvc up to about a foot from the ceiling. Run two
- pairs up this pvc. This is for (a) phone across room w/out wires
- across floor (b)speakers for a central background music system (c)
- intercom wiring, if you install a central intercom system. It's also a
- way to get another line or two into a room easily.
-
- TAG EACH WIRE at the central location carefully. You'll forget after
- a year or two! I usually put the pvc's in a row | | | | on a piece
- of plywood, note what comes from where, and further, record it with
- other important household papers.
-
- I'd ALSO run (in PVC again, maybe 1/2" inside diam) wires (two pair)
- to each window, door, garage door, etc. This would be for future
- security system/burglar alarm. Windows, put the wire the same spot
- next to each casing, usually center on one side or the other. Doors,
- hinge side, top of the casing.
-
- Finally, I'd run two pairs (in PVC) to each door for an outside
- speaker connection for an intercom.
-
- I'd also run a six pair buried below the frost line in thick walled
- CPVC (the kind rated for hot water use) out to the end of the drive.
- This would be for a post, to stick a key in, or operate a combination,
- to open the garage door when it's raining. Forget those radio-operated
- things. I disconnect the receiver and use only hard wired key
- switches. Makes the thief's job that much harder. Of course, for the
- above ground part of this "get in the garage in the rain" one should
- 'harden' it w/metal conduit for the exposed part, or some other
- method.
-
- I just did (three months ago) a house like I've described above for a
- friend. The studs were up, and electricians had run their conduits.
- At this point, it took my friend and I two full days of eight to ten
- hours (fair amount of breaks for soda and story-swapping). Materials
- costs, was (including the wire, 66 blocks, a punch tool for him, RJ
- jacks for the phones, misc, misc, tie wraps, etc etc. was right around
- $800. That ain't cheap. BUT, it covers:
-
- Phones: two to six lines. Plus the extra jacks/room. Intercoms: all
- rooms Security wiring: we ran wires if there was "any" question that
- it might be wanted someday. Secure access to garage: (well, not
- really -- a standard garage roll up door is about the least secure
- thing there is, really!) Think about it a bit ... 8' un-supported
- panels, thin, usually, cheap track hardware.
-
- Stereo/music system wires
-
- Oh yeah! Outside speaker wiring under eaves, and in a conduit to the
- middle of the non-yard (in case of pool) we also ran a twelve-pair out
- there for possilbe phones/intercoms...
-
- Anyhow, I hope this gives some ideas. It really *is* much cheaper and
- more convenient to do it when the house is still open. I charge a LOT
- by the hour to pull wires in existing structures (not "installer"
- wiring, but clean, impossible to find, NICE wiring) which is what most
- of us really would want.
-
-
- | mearle@pro-party.cts.com (Mark Earle) [WA2MCT/5] |
- | CIS 73117,351 MCI Mail to: MEARLE |
- | My BBS: (512)-855-7564 Opus 1:160/50.0 |
- | Blucher Institute, Corpus Christi State University |
- | "The System IS The Solution" |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #357
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa01245;
- 17 May 90 21:45 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa09021;
- 17 May 90 20:07 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa13872;
- 17 May 90 19:03 CDT
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 18:30:22 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #358
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005171830.ac19323@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Thu, 17 May 90 18:30:00 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 358
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Sprint Outage -- Fiber Cut in Massachusetts [Steve Elias]
- US Sprint Outage in Massachusetts Fixed [Steve Elias]
- Ted Rogers (was: CNCP Telecommunications Becomes Unitel) [Mark Brader]
- Re: The Bounders! [John Slater]
- AT&T NAVSTAR/GPS News Excerpts [James Price Salsman]
- 809 Routing and Directory Assistance [John R. Covert]
- Metallic Interoffice Circuits and Audible Outpulsing [Joseph Pistritto]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: eli@pws.bull.com
- Subject: Sprint Outage -- Fiber Cut in Massachusetts
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 11:41:38 -0400
- From: Steve Elias <eli@pws.bull.com>
-
-
- Sprint access from Boston is out as of 11:30 AM 5/17. Apparently
- there is a fiber cut in Massachusetts somewhere. Also, a big Sprint
- fiber in NJ was cut yesterday.
-
-
- /eli
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: eli@pws.bull.com
- Subject: US Sprint Outage in Massachusetts Fixed
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 14:13:41 -0400
- From: Steve Elias <eli@pws.bull.com>
-
-
- As of 1415 EST, it appears that the cut Sprint fiber cable in
- Massachusetts has been fixed.
-
-
- /eli
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Mark Brader <msb@sq.com>
- Subject: Ted Rogers (was: CNCP Telecommunications Becomes Unitel)
- Date: Wed, 16 May 1990 05:16:46 -0400
-
- > Sorry, Mr. Moderator, different Rogers. Rogers Communications in
- > Canada is definitely 100% Canadian. The principal Ted Rogers, was
- > born and bred in Toronto. He originally started in Broadcasting
- > (Radio Station CFRB in Toronto the RB standing for Rogers
- > Broadcasting) and has some ties to TV broadcasting as well.
-
- Actually, the Rogers of CFRB was Ted Rogers Senior (1900-1939), while
- the Rogers of Rogers Communications is his son, Ted Rogers Junior
- (1933?-). And the RB stands for Rogers *Batteryless*, and thereby
- hangs a tale.
-
- | By the end of the First World War, Rogers, already well known
- | in amateur radio circles ... was thinking seriously about the
- | problems of voice reception. By then the storage batteries that
- | were causing parlor floors to part company from their skirting
- | boards were being replaced by lighter dry cells. Unfortunately, when
- | these began to run down after a few hours' operation, they caused the
- | receivers to emit screams of agony--which in turn caused listeners
- | to do the same. ...
-
- | In 1924 he read about the work of a Mr. F. S. McCullogh of Pittsburgh,
- | who had invented an alternating current tube. Rogers journeyed to
- | Pittsburgh ... it proved to be a disappointingly crude device.
- | While it had eliminated the piercing screams, it had replaced them
- | with an unmelodious mains hum that made reception almost equally
- | uncomfortable.
-
- | ... Rogers purchased the Canadian rights to the tube. He ... succeeded
- | in turning it into a workable device by the end of the year. The following
- | June, he took out a patent on his rectifier.
-
- | ... a radio historian, Ormond Raby, says that by the time Rogers'
- | batteryless receiver appeared, "other light socket sets had now,
- | of course, come on to the market in great quantity...", ... [but]
- | the Rogers set was, in the opinion of the patent attorneys, the
- | best of the lot.
-
- | ... Rogers' batteryless sets rapidly gained so commanding a place
- | in the market, despite their cost (his first five-tube mantel set
- | cost $260, plus another $45 for the loudspeaker [this in 1925!])
- | that the competition became alarmed. After Rogers had been in
- | business for a few months, his rectifier tubes started to fail at
- | a rate that threatened the sales of his receivers. According to
- | a contemporary, Norm Olding, "Ted worked for twenty to twenty-four
- | hours a day in an attempt to locate the source of the trouble, and
- | discovered it was due to faulty filament materials..."
-
- | It turned out that the filament wire was from a firm that had conn-
- | ections with a rival manufacturer. Ted Rogers was being sabotaged.
- | When he started importing the filament wire from Europe, the trouble
- | with his rectifiers cleared up instantly.
-
- | ... Soon after incorporating the Standard Radio Manufacturing Company
- | for the marketing of his batteryless sets, it occurred to Rogers that
- | he was not likely to greatly increase the sales of his receivers
- | unless there was something worth receiving.
-
- | In 1927, five stations catered to the relatively substantial Toronto-
- | area market. Ted did not feel that their program quality did justice
- | to his equipment.
-
- | Their transmission quality was even worse. French horns blared like
- | foghorns, sopranos sounded as if they were singing in a particularly
- | deep bathtub while simultaneously ingesting pieces of pumice.
- | Moreover, [there was] interference from scores of American stations...
-
- | Accordingly, Rogers decided to apply the idea of batteryless reception
- | to the transmitting end, and in 1927 he founded what is believed to
- | be the first batteryless broadcasting station in the world, CFRB.
-
- Well, actually "batteryless" was a slight exaggeration.
-
- | "In fact, in Ted Rogers' first batteryless set, I put the battery in",
- | [Bill] Baker said [to the author], chuckling obscurely from the depths
- | of his favorite armchair.
-
- | "Eh?"
-
- | "At that time they hadn't learned to put C bias in the set", Baker
- | explained. "So in the bottom of the set I put the C bias battery
- | that would last the lifetime of the 'batteryless' receiver."
-
- Excerpts from "Sinc, Betty, and the Morning Man: The Story of CFRB" by
- Donald Jack, 1977, Macmillan of Canada, ISBN 0-7705-1516-9.
-
-
- Mark Brader "[This computation] assumed that everything
- SoftQuad Inc., Toronto would work, a happy state of affairs found
- utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com only in fiction." -- Tom Clancy
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "John Slater" <johns@happy.uk.sun.com>
- Subject: Re: The Bounders!
- Date: 17 May 90 14:32:08 GMT
- Reply-To: "John Slater <johns@happy.uk.sun.com>
-
-
- In article <7846@accuvax.nwu.edu>, nigelw@ibmpcug.co.uk (Nigel
- Whitfield) writes:
-
- >Almost all the payphones that I have tried to do this on lately have
- >been modified so that the keypad is disabled once you dial 131, and
- >the signal tone given as if you'd called the operator, making it
- >rather difficult to use Mercury from a BT payphone. It is not possible
- >to use your Mercury account from a Mercury payphone.
-
- Yes it is, if you use a pocket touch-tone pad (you know, the kind that
- drug dealers use :-) to do all the dialling (including the initial 131
- - MF often works to the switch even if the phone still uses pulse).
- But bear in mind that as Mercury's business expands, they bring in
- more switches, and you find that use of a particular Mercury code is
- getting restricted closer and closer to the place it's supposed to be
- used from. I live in south London, about 6 miles from the centre. I
- used to be able to use my Mercury account from anywhere in the west
- end, but not anymore.
-
- >Payphones in pubs, restaurants and other off-street locations can
- >still be used in this way, but the number seems to be dwindling.
-
- This is indeed true - but I haven't noticed the dwindling!
-
- >The {London Evening Standard} reported recently that BT have withdrawn
- >their tone generating keypads from sale because of a loophole that
- >allowed people to use them to make free calls from coinboxes. I don't
- >know what this loophole was, but the Standard reported it as simply
- >having to press two digits.
-
- This was hilarious! One report claimed BT have already lost 15,000,000
- pounds through this bug. Apparently it's a special test code for
- engineers to disable the requirement for coins to be inserted before
- dialling. BT are now running round the country to all 80,000
- payphones patching the software in the phones (apparently they can't
- do this from the switch). I believe they previously had to visit all
- the phones to disable 131 as well - maybe this was when the bug crept
- in?
-
- I think the two-digit thing was a red herring. I heard it was five
- digits - this was from an ex-BT employee, but he said he "couldn't
- remember" the digits!
-
- This was a great story. It's good to see giants tremble ...
-
-
- John
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 18:28:25 -0400 (EDT)
- From: James Price Salsman <js7a+@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Subject: AT&T NAVSTAR/GPS News Excerpts
-
-
- From _Data_Communications_ (ISSN 0363-6399) vol. 19, no. 6, May 1990, page 56
- (c) 1990 McGraw-Hill Inc
-
-
- DOD DITHERS DIGITAL DATA
-
- Telephone network synchronization is an unlikely topic for heated
- controversey, but that is what the U.S. Department of Defense has
- provoked by tampering with the Navstar Global Positioning Satellite
- (GPS) system that AT&T plans to use as a network clock.
-
- GPS is a group of 13 satellites now in operation and 27 more to be
- launched by 1994 [I believe this is in error, as there are to be 27
- total satellites in the constellation --jps], each of which produces
- and encrypted P code that the military uses to guide missles, and
- another signal, called the Clear/Acquisition signal, that has been
- available for commercial uses like surveying and timing communications
- networks.
-
- But the DoD has decided that even the C/A signal is too accurate to be
- generally available, so it has begun a practice it calls "selective
- availability." That delicious piece of bureaucratese means that the
- DoD will introduce random noise on the C/A signal, known in some
- circles as "dithering," to make it dificult or even impossible to use.
-
- Meanwhile, some commercial equiptment manufacturers and users, such as
- land surveyors, are already relying on the signal and now are angry
- that the DoD is changing the rules. "There is a big controversey
- about why the government is doing this," says Jim Jespersen, a staff
- member of the time and frequency division of the National Institute of
- Standards and Technology (Boulder, Colo.), "especially since the
- threat from the Russians is not so severe." [The "Russians" have a
- very accurate GPS system of their own, called GLONASS, so someone is
- confused here... --jps]
-
- GPS is run by the U.S. Air Force Systems Command's Space Division in
- Los Angeles. The officer in charge of the project, Col. Marty Runkle
- of the Joint Program Office, could not be reached for comment.
-
- As for AT&T, George Zampetti, a Bell Laboratories scientist who is in
- charge of developing AT&T's synchronization scheme, says that the
- company plans to use the C/A signal even if it is ditthered.
-
- Zampetti and John Abate, another Bell Labs scientist, say AT&T will
- use 3B2 computers to filter out the noise to get close to the true
- signal. Filtering will slow down but not eliminate the use of GPS,
- Abate says.
-
- "We could go a month and still maintain" on error in 100 billion
- events, Zampetti says.
-
- The key to the system is Rubidium clocks that actually pass timing to
- AT&T's switches and transmission network. Those Rubidium clocks can
- maintain network timing to meet requirements of ANSI and CCITT
- standards, Zampetti says. AT&T would use GPS to calibrate and monitor
- the rubidium clocks. -John T. Mulqueen
-
- [The main article (of which that was a sidebar) talks about MCI and
- Sprint's use of Loran, atomic clocks, and describes GPS. The ANSI
- standard in question is T1.101, by committee T1X1.3, which describes
- syncronization for high-bandwidth long-haul digital transmission.
- --jps]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 07:08:43 PDT
- From: "John R. Covert 17-May-1990 0933" <covert@covert.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: 809 Routing and Directory Assistance
-
- >As far as 809 Directory Assistance goes, wasn't there a posting some
- >time back that AT&T has set up something of a service which allows 1
- >809 555.1212 to go to an AT&T operator who asks for the island or
- >region, then transfers over to the appropriate operator for the island
- >requested?
-
- Since the very early days of DDD, 809 DA was handled from a cord board
- first in downtown Jacksonville and then in Jacksonville Beach. Today,
- calls go to a TSPS operator in Jacksonville. These operators have
- always asked you for the destination and have then extended the call
- to local directory assistance.
-
- Canada has never had access to this service. Canadians must dial
- their "0" operator and ask for the desired island.
-
- >What's the toll center for 809
-
- Just like 212 and most area codes, 809 has several toll centers. And
- just like any other area code with several toll centers, each local
- toll center does six-digit translation of the number to determine
- which toll center to route traffic to. If there's enough traffic
- volume, the originating toll center may have direct trunks to, say,
- Puerto Rico, but send traffic to all other parts of 809 to
- Jacksonville. Recently some 809 traffic has been moved into the large
- international gateway in Atlanta.
-
- From Canada, all 809 traffic is handled via Montreal, though local
- toll centers check the validity of the six-digit code before passing
- the call.
-
- >does anyone know when Trinidad and Tobago go off on their own country code
- >(296) and get out of the NANP?
-
- There are no plans to actually use 296. Trinidad and Tobago merely
- applied for the country code to be sure they could have one, but
- intend to stay in the North American Integrated Numbering Plan Area.
- There are certain very significant economic advantages to having a
- number that looks like all the rest of the North American numbers.
- They may reconsider their plans to stay in 809 if 809 splits or if
- they run out of local numbers.
-
-
- /john
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Metallic Interoffice Circuits and Audible Outpulsing
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 10:01:27 MESZ
- From: "Joseph C. Pistritto" <jcp@cgch.uucp>
-
- One of the places I hear this ALL THE TIME, is in India. You can here
- it even when dialing in internationally. My wife's parents live in
- Dehra Dun, India, which is served via a terrestrial microwave link
- from the south to New Dehli, (it may attach to other towns as well
- along the way). Their central office is crossbar. Dehra Dun is one
- of the towns you can dial directly from overseas (most small towns
- can't be accessed directly in India, but all the best private schools
- in India are in Dehra Dun, so they have STD service). After dialing,
- and getting a satellite circuit to Dehli (usually noisy), you can hear
- 20pps outpulsing of the STD code for Dehra Dun (135) and then your
- number (5 digits in my case). Then after a 10 to 30 seconds delay,
- either ringing or nothing. I believe the explanation about metallic
- circuits allowing this, perhaps the office with the microwave network
- is so connected to the satellite terminal. Amusingly, you don't
- usually hear this when dialing a number in Dehli.
-
- Another amusing thing about calling India is that call supervision is
- sometimes not returned (you seem to always have an audio path during
- dialing, the ringing you hear comes from the DehraDun switch in my
- case), so that after your called party picks up, you can often talk
- for several minutes for free! (this happens about 20% of the time
- actually, and on some days 100%). In the case, the local phone system
- eventually times out and drops the connection, (usually after about 2
- -3 minutes).
-
- And here's a hazard to DDD you probably haven't thought of. My
- mother-in-law had the ability to make direct trunk calls (called STD
- in India) from her phone, but had to have it disabled (which can be
- done on a per-line basis there, they raise your basic rate if you have
- STD capability), because of all the fradulently billed calls on her
- bill. Seems it's common practice for craftspeople to dial their
- friends and stuff the extra charges onto some random STD customer's
- bill. Since call detail is NOT provided, just # of minutes to each
- destination, it's real hard to fight this.
-
- -jcp-
-
- Joseph C. Pistritto (cgch!bpistr@chx400.switch.ch, jcp@brl.mil)
- Ciba Geigy AG, R1241.1.01, Postfach CH4002, Basel, Switzerland
- Tel: +41 61 697 6155 (work) +41 61 692 1728 (home) GMT+2hrs!
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #358
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa06680;
- 18 May 90 12:58 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa26457;
- 18 May 90 0:12 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa00958;
- 17 May 90 23:08 CDT
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 23:05:22 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #359
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005172305.ab00139@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Thu, 17 May 90 23:05:00 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 359
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- AT&T USA-Direct [Bill Nickless]
- Won't Break Dialtone (was Re: Pricing vrs. Cost of Touch-tone) [B. Kantor]
- Trunk Interface Development System (was: T1 Boards/Platforms) [B. Clements]
- Information Needed: Virtual Modem Pool? [Myranda A. Johnson]
- Telco Billing Brings Surprises [Mark Earle]
- Questions About ISDN [Dave McCracken]
- Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD Long Distance Discount [Curtis Reid]
- Automatic "Collect" [John Higdon]
- Hotel Phone Charges [Jim Gottlieb]
- ATT: "Software Defined Network" [Steve Elias]
- The So-Called Long-Distance Add-on [John R. Covert]
- SW Bell Voice Activated Phone? [Steve Wolfson]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 09:43:48 CDT
- From: Bill Nickless <nickless@flash.ras.anl.gov>
- Subject: AT&T USA-Direct
-
-
- In TELECOM Digest Volume 10 Issue 351 Carol Springs wrote of her
- experience with an AT&T Calling Card representative. She expressed
- concern that although she had a BOC calling card, and the AT&T calling
- card she was ordering would probably have the same numbers on it, she
- would be unable to use the BOC calling card with the USA-DIRECT
- service from AT&T.
-
- She is right. Last summer I was in the United Kingdom and tried to
- use my Michigan Bell calling card number to reach back to my home in
- Michigan. (I was even calling the same number as the card was issued
- for.)
-
- AT&T didn't accept the card as valid.
-
- Moral: If you're going to use USA-DIRECT, get a real-live AT&T calling
- card. Maybe even the Universal Card (?).
-
-
- detour mail to nickless@flash.ras.anl.gov
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Brian Kantor <brian@ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Won't Break Dialtone (was Re: Pricing vrs. Cost of Touch-tone)
- Date: 16 May 90 15:20:01 GMT
- Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd.
-
-
- In article <7797@accuvax.nwu.edu> roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) writes:
-
- >> A TT phone wouldn't break dial tone.
-
- If you have a TouchTone phone that generates tones, but won't break
- dialtone, it might be caused by these defects: 1) low level,
- 2) distorted tones, 3) off-frequency tones.
-
- Check to see if your dial will produce a single tone when two buttons
- in a single column or row are pressed. If so, you can listen to them;
- they should be of equal volume and sound pure. Take another phone
- off-hook on the same line, break dialtone with it, and then push the
- buttons on the suspect phone whilst listening on the second phone. If
- they sound LOUD and pure, 1 and 2 are probably not the problem.
-
- To check the frequency of the tones when the phone can't dial well
- enough to break the dialtone, use the column/row pure tone trick on
- BOTH phones simultaneously and listen to the beat note between them.
- It should be real slow - if you can hear a fast beat or there's a
- notable difference in the pitches you hear between the two phones,
- it's a frequency problem.
-
- The older TouchTone dials used ferrite cup-cores with a tuning slug to
- generate the tones; if dropped or shocked hard enough, the cores might
- crack, or the glue holding the two parts might come unstuck, or the
- tuning slug might move. Sometimes that's repairable. But with old
- dials going for $1 or $2 in the electro-junk stores, it might not be
- worth messing with it much - just change the dial.
-
-
- - Brian
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Trunk Interface Development System (was: T1 Boards/ Platforms)
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 11:50:29 -0400
- From: clements@bbn.com
-
-
- In article <7616@accuvax.nwu.edu> macg@cs.ualberta.ca writes:
-
- >I am looking for a platform for some experiments in T1 restoration.
-
- >Mail direct and I'll summarize if interest warrants.
-
- I have the same sort of question, but for analog trunk interfaces.
- Who are vendors for such things, and/or what are the right trade rags
- to browse to find such vendors?
-
- What I need is a card that has (in the optimum case):
-
- one to four interfaces to E&M PBX trunks (to connect to
- a plain vanilla analog SX-200 PBX, for example),
-
- Does A/D conversion (codec), preferably ADPCM or something
- better than 64KBPS,
-
- Generates/reads DTMF and call progress signals,
-
- Does call setup/teardown,
-
- Plugs into a standard bus for control/data (Multibus, PC/AT,
- VME or whatever).
-
- I understand this stuff in the abstract, but now I need to get some
- real hardware and I don't know who to call.
-
- Thanks for any advice, I'll post a summary too if I get any good info.
-
-
- Bob Clements, K1BC, clements@bbn.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "23457-Myranda A Johnson(4482" <nvuxh!maj5@bellcore.bellcore.com>
- Subject: Information Needed: Virtual Modem Pool?
- Date: 16 May 90 19:35:27 GMT
-
-
- A friend of mine is looking for information to help him on his job.
- The problem seems to be there are many callers (voice and modem) to
- the system he is working on. From my understanding, he works on a
- hotline system servicing customers of their products to help solve
- problems. In order to service a customer, the hotline attendant
- accesses the system through the local computer at their site.
-
- He wants information on a product that will serve as a virtual circuit
- so that the many calls that arrive are queued with some time limit on
- how long they can be in the queue. The expected number of calls is
- 1000 or more simultaneously (something like a virtual modem pool or
- automatic call distributor.)
-
- Does any one have any information about some type of machine or device
- (or know where he can obtain info) that can meet his needs?
-
- Thanks!
-
- Myranda Johnson
- ...!bellcore!nvuxh!maj5
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 19:52:07 CDT
- From: Mark Earle <mearle@pro-party.cts.com>
- Subject: Telco Billing Brings Surprises
-
-
- This month, I received a few surprises in my phone bill from
- Southwestern Bell Telephone company, serving me in Corpus Christi,
- TX, 512-855-xxxx.
-
- First, was a page, (page 7, not an 'insert' or anything, same header
- as the rest of the bill).
-
- Additional Line
- 1 minute quiz
-
- Do you value convenience and peace of mind?
- Do you have children between the ages of 11 and 19?
- Do you have a roomate?
- Are you an adult whose parents live with you?
- Do you have a home computer?
- ---------------------------------<<< Emphasis mine!
- Do you have adult children living at home?
- Does anyone in your household work "after hours" at home?
-
- If you answered yes to one or more questions, consider a second
- telephone line. It could make your home a more convenient place to
- live. To order, or for more information, call your SWB service
- representative.
-
- =====end of advertising text=====
-
- Well, I called. Specifically, I asked if the computer and person
- working at home, would still qualify that second line as a residence
- rate. They emphatically said yes. Further, if you wish, you may have
- the second number listed in either the white business OR residential
- pages. ONLY if you wish to have a yellow-pages listing are you to be
- billed at the business rate (note, there will be a yp listing, in the
- appropriate category of business; but you are still billed residence,
- UNLESS you wish to have a YP addvertisement of multiple-category
- listing.
-
- This seems somewhat of a reversal. I also asked "what if I wish to
- have my computer answer my second phone, for other computer users to
- call and leave me messages?" Again, "no problem" still residence
- rate.
-
- Interesting.
-
- I didn't have the nerve to ask about paying computer users :-)
- (I don't charge at all for my bbs).
-
- I got a further surprise in this month's billing:
-
- Page 8 had the MCI [------- line out of the M logo, and billed me
- $1.95 for a one minute collect call. For a call (to me at area code
- 512) from area code 316, Garden City, KS.
-
- I remember sleepily answering and accepting this call, even though it
- turned out to be a wrong number. (Fourteen hour days do that to ya!)
-
- My problems are:
-
- On this line, ITT/Metromedia (LDS) is my default 1+ carrier. How does
- MCI enter into this?
-
- 1.95 for one minute?!!!!!!! This was at 9:23 pm local time on April 16.
- (Monday evening local time).
-
- The number listed for MCI Communications billing inquiries is
- 1-951-7009, a free call. This is the SAME number listed elsewhere in
- the bill for problems with AT&T AND SWB billing questions.
-
- I guess I'm liable, since I *did* accept it. But, what a rate! I do
- intend to inquire about how MCI ended up billing me. I would have
- thought that MY choice of LD carrier would "win". At this point, I
- suspect the calling person had MCI as their default.
-
- I'll let y'all know if I turn up anything further.
-
-
- | mearle@pro-party.cts.com (Mark Earle) [WA2MCT/5] |
- | CIS 73117,351 MCI Mail to: MEARLE |
- | My BBS: (512)-855-7564 Opus 1:160/50.0 |
- | Blucher Institute, Corpus Christi State University |
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Admittedly, $1.95 for one minute seems like a
- strange price, but remember, the call was handled by MCI, the company
- which saves you money on your long distance bill. I'm sitting here
- trying to keep a straight face and not smirk as I type this. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Questions About ISDN
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 15:39:43 CDT
- From: dcm@baldur.dell.com
-
-
- I have recently been hearing about ISDN from various places and began
- reading comp.dcom.telecom on Usenet. I am now very interested in
- finding out more about it, both for my own use and for the good of
- Dell Computer. I thought you might be able to point me in the right
- direction to answer my questions.
-
- How do I get a copy of the standard, and is it complete or just in
- draft form? Is there hardware currently available in the form of
- PC-AT network boards? voice phones? Has anyone written a driver to
- run TCP/IP over ISDN? for SV streams? How do I set up my house with
- both a PC with a board and one or more regular phones? Can I use
- standard phones with a converter downstream or do I have to replace
- all my phones? What wiring do I need going into my house to support
- this?
-
- Thanks for any answers or pointers you might be able to provide.
-
-
- Dave McCracken dcm@dell.dell.com (512) 343-3720
- Dell Computer 9505 Arboretum Blvd Austin, TX 78759-7299
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 09:48 EST
- From: "Curtis E. Reid" <CER2520@ritvax.bitnet>
- Subject: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD Long Distance Discount
-
-
- I heard a disturbing news that AT&T may consider removing the TDD Long
- Distance Toll Call discounts when AT&T does its own billing. The
- rationale for this is that no other services like MCI or Sprint offer
- this discount so why should AT&T.
-
- AT&T has a strong loyal base of handicapped and disabled customers.
- If something like this discount goes away, I'm sure that other
- services for handicapped customers will also go away, too.
-
- I can't get any information from AT&T so I do not know what's the real
- scoop but I would be very disappointed that I can't rely on AT&T
- anymore. I chose AT&T over other carriers because of their
- attentiveness and responsiveness to hearing-impaired and handicapped
- customers.
-
- Can any TELECOM readers comment on this? AT&T, don't consider removing TDD
- discounts!!
-
- Curtis Reid
- CER2520@RITVAX.Bitnet
- CER2520%RITVAX.Bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu (Internet)
- CER2520@vaxd.isc.rit.edu (Not Reliable-NYSernet)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Automatic "Collect"
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com>
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Date: 17 May 90 02:34:17 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com>
-
-
- I just returned from a three-day trip to probably the most rural area
- in California short of Death Valley: the very northern/central part of
- the state near the Oregon border. There were some interesting
- telephone-related thing there, but for openers here is something you
- might find in your own town.
-
- In Yreka, there were two COCOTs that have the automatic "collect"
- function discussed a while back in this group. It is completely
- contained in the phone. When you place the call, you are asked to say
- your name which is recorded in the instrument. The unit then dials the
- call, announces a collect call to the recipient using your recorded
- name as the call originator. The recipient is then asked to press "1"
- if they accept, or "0" if they refuse. If they do nothing, the
- request, including your name, is repeated.
-
- Now here is the shocker. If they still do nothing (as might happen if
- they have a rotary phone or simply hang up), the call goes through!
- This means that if the hapless recipient has a rotary phone, he/she
- may find some outrageous AOS charge on the bill from someone they
- don't even know.
-
- BTW, if you are wondering who the test victim was... The IBT Chicago
- Newsline is going to be surprised to get a collect call from Yreka!
- And please, no flames about how the poor AOS or COCOT operator blah,
- blah, blah. This nonsense (automated collect call placing that doesn't
- work right) cannot be taken seriously, except as something to be
- reported to a bunch of people at regulatory agencies who couldn't care
- less.
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@zygot.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jim Gottlieb <jimmy@icjapan.info.com>
- Subject: Hotel Phone Charges
- Date: 17 May 90 10:04:46 GMT
- Reply-To: Jim Gottlieb <jimmy@denwa.info.com>
- Organization: Info Connections, Tokyo, Japan
-
-
- In a hotel in California recently, the following was posted in the
- room (approximate text from memory):
-
- "In accordance with Assembly Bill 689, we are informing you of
- charges for telephone calls made from your room. The cost of
- the calls is based on AT&T rates plus mark-up and the duration
- of the calls, but not less than $0.95 per call."
-
- I don't know if they were complying with the letter of the law in
- Assembly Bill 689, but they were sure avoiding the intent. They might
- as well have said, "We'll charge you whatever we feel like charging
- you and we're not going to tell you how much." What the hell does
- "AT&T rates plus mark-up" mean? How much mark-up?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: eli@pws.bull.com
- Subject: ATT: "Software Defined Network"
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 09:59:50 -0400
- From: Steve Elias <eli@pws.bull.com>
-
-
- My new ATT card is quite nifty in that it does not list the entire PIN
- on the card. But I'm wondering about "Software Defined Network"...
- Has ATT just figured out how to use software to configure their
- network? Why are they boasting about something which is old news?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 07:16:36 PDT
- From: "John R. Covert 17-May-1990 1012" <covert@covert.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: The So-Called Long-Distance Add-on
-
-
- Alex Pournelle recently asked a question asked and answered a few
- hundred times in TELECOM Digest: "Can I order a local only line and
- not pay the long-distance add-on."
-
- There is _no_ long-distance add-on. The only relationship that the
- access charge has to long distance is that it replaces the subsidy
- that AT&T used to pay local phone companies out of the old, higher,
- long distance rates.
-
- Long distance companies no longer subsidize local service, as in the
- past. Rather than force the local telcos to go through rate hearings
- in each state to replace the revenue formerly obtained by artificially
- high long distance rates, the FCC mandated a specific amount to be
- charged as a part of local service.
-
-
- /john
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Steve Wolfson <motcid!wolfson@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: SW Bell Voice Activated Phone?
- Date: 17 May 90 16:44:04 GMT
- Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Div., Arlington Hgts, IL
-
-
- I recently saw an ad for a Southwestern Bell Phone that activates its
- memory #'s via voice recognition. Any comments on how good this phone
- really works? The fact the it is being sold through DAMARK (closeout
- specialists) may already indicate this phone didn't do so well in the
- market.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #359
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa06901;
- 18 May 90 13:02 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa15230;
- 18 May 90 2:16 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa28013;
- 18 May 90 1:12 CDT
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 0:21:01 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #360
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005180021.ab01087@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Fri, 18 May 90 00:20:39 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 360
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Isaac Rabinovitch]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Dan Jacobson]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Bob Goudreau]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Jeremy Grodberg]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [F. E. Carey]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Larry Lippman]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [Macy Hallock]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [Craig R. Watkins]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [Jeremy Grodberg]
- Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing? [Ole J. Jacobsen]
- Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing? [Marvin Jones]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Rabinovitch Isaac <claris!netcom!ergo@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Date: 17 May 90 18:46:10 GMT
- Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 249-0290}
-
-
- danj1@ihlpa.att.com (Daniel Jacobson) writes:
-
- >Say I live in areacode 708 (Suburban Chicago). I program up my phone
- >with lots of Chicago numbers (1-312-XXX-XXXX). One day me and phone
- >go and spend the week at uncle Billy's in Chicago. Now I got to
- >reprogram my phone to edit out all those 1-312 areacodes if I want the
- >phone to work there [or else listen to the helpful recording]. Isn't
- >that dumb?
-
- The dumb one is the phone (or dialing software, which I use). It
- should allow you to enter a "local" area code and automatically delete
- them from local calls. Silly, in an age where portability (as in
- laptops with built-in modems) is all the rage.
-
- It's *really* frustrating when software designers neglect to think
- through issues like this. For example, which should a terminal
- emulating program do when it the modem gives a "VOICE" return code?
- Obviously, it should stop and demand correction from the nearest
- carbon-based unit. But not only do none of them provide this feature,
- but many are factory-configured to treat "VOICE" the same as "BUSY" --
- which usually implies redialling the number! Hopefully, that hasn't
- yet led to violence....
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- From: ihlpa!danj1@att.uucp
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 16:36:00 GMT
-
-
- > [Moderator's Note: Are you saying eleven digit dialing should be
- > mandatory throughout 312/708, even for the folks who make all/most of
- > their calls on one side or the other, or are you saying eleven digit
- > dialing intra-areacode should be optional, with telco absorbing the
- > first four digits (1-312 or 1-708) when they are not needed? PT]
-
- The latter. I don't care how they are absorbed. The only change from
- the current North American system I want is so 1-XXX-YYY-YYYY no
- longer would fail just because you happen to be in areacode XXX.
-
- Imagine in the year 2020, you, the CEO of BigCo, Inc., are passing
- (unaware) thru Pittsburgh PA on the Lubra-Tube(tm) intracontinental
- transit system of the future. "Dammit Jenkins, the phone failed
- again... Hmm... Chen is in Pittsburgh, and we are in [you glance at
- your skymap] ...Pittsburgh... {snarl, growl} ...if only those TELECOM
- Digest folks' idea back in 19... 90[!] was adopted..."
-
-
- Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM Naperville IL USA +1 708-979-6364
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Well, you know some cellular companies already
- allow this. Ameritech Mobile has optional *ten* digit dialing (no
- leading '1' required) everywhere, including within the same area code.
- Where a local prefix matches an area code elsewhere, (i.e. my
- cellphone number is 312-415-xxxx) then the leading '1' is required.
- If we ever go to mandatory eleven digit dialing, then we can actually
- get by with ten digits, since the first three would always be presumed
- to be an area code, and the leading '1' would be assumed in every
- case. Oddly enough here, we can even dial cellular-to-cellular
- inter-area (312/708) with *seven* digits. Apparently no prefix
- duplication yet, where cellular is concerned. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 13:25:52 edt
- From: Bob Goudreau <goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Reply-To: goudreau@larrybud.rtp.dg.com (Bob Goudreau)
- Organization: Data General Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC
-
-
- I think he meant the latter. I agree with him, and I would like to
- see "Syntax U" (as a previous telecom reader has dubbed it, the "U"
- denoting "Universal") available throughout the whole NANP, not just in
- (say) the Chicago area. I expect that plenty of other people will
- start sharing this sentiment in the next few years, as cellular phones
- (and portable computers with modems) become ever more widespread, and
- as area codes become geographically smaller.
-
- People will resent the fact that their pre-programmed numbers will
- suddenly become unusable just because they crossed a geographic
- boundary. I already find it annoying to receive a "We're sorry, it is
- not necessary to dial the area code..." message -- if the telco is
- smart enough to figure that out for me, why can't it be smart enough
- to put me through to the desired number?
-
-
- Bob Goudreau +1 919 248 6231
- Data General Corporation
- 62 Alexander Drive goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com
- Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 ...!mcnc!rti!xyzzy!goudreau
- USA
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 16:32:45 PDT
- From: Jeremy Grodberg <jgro@apldbio.com>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Reply-To: jgro@apldbio.com (Jeremy Grodberg)
-
-
- [Description of security holes in phone systems and past employees
- request for help in how/if do tell them deleted.]
-
- I guess I fall between the two positions most widely espoused. I
- think that the former employee should tell the employer that serious
- security flaws exist, but (s)he *should not* explain what they are in
- any detail. Rather, (s)he should offer to explain them to a
- responsible party if asked to.
-
- My concern is that 1) if (s)he says nothing, (s)he could later be held
- negligent in his/her duties and liable for damage caused by the
- security holes, and 2) if (s)he say too much, (s)he could be teaching
- more people how to break security at that phone company, and again be
- liable.
-
- Note: I am not an attorney, I just get paranoid.
-
-
- Jeremy Grodberg
- jgro@apldbio.com "Beware: free advice is often overpriced!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 08:59:00 EDT
- From: F E Carey <fec@whuts.att.com>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- >My tenure at the (deleted) Telephone Company has abrubtly ended. I had
- >been wandering around the company's Xenix system while I was at work,
- >and they didn't like it. (As a disclaimer, I didn't do any damage,
- >wasn't stealing proprietary info, etc.) I was doing it out of sheer
- >boredom.
-
- >I feel the need to let them know about the gaping (and I mean gaping)
- >computer and physical security holes they have, but I'm not sure about
- >the best way to approach it (or even if I should).
-
- If the "(deleted)" Telephone Company is one of the Bell Regional
- Operating Companies (i.e. formerly Bell System) I'd suggest reporting
- your concerns to two places - the security management of the phone
- company and to Bellcore. Bellcore provides R&D and tech support to
- the regional companies. I can get you a name and phone number at
- Bellcore and probably for most operating companies.
-
- If the "deleted" phone company is AT&T I'd suggest you report your
- concern to AT&T Corporate Security. Again, I'll get you a name and
- phone number over there, too, or if you want to supply your info
- directly to me I'll see that it gets to the proper person.
-
- Call or e-mail for more specifics or if you want to chat.
-
-
- Frank Carey
- Corporate Computer Security Manager
- AT&T Bell Laboratories
- Whippany, N. J.
- 201/386-2618
- fec@whuts.ATT.COM
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Date: 18 May 90 00:12:21 EDT (Fri)
- From: Larry Lippman <kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net>
-
- In article <7781@accuvax.nwu.edu> (Someone-Someplace) writes:
-
- > My tenure at the (deleted) Telephone Company has abrubtly ended. I had
- > been wandering around the company's Xenix system while I was at work,
- > and they didn't like it. (As a disclaimer, I didn't do any damage,
- > wasn't stealing proprietary info, etc.) I was doing it out of sheer
- > boredom.
-
- While I am certain that there are Telecom Digest readers who
- will disagree with my opinion, I have absolutely *no* sympathy for your
- predicament.
-
- Would you walk into various offices and start looking through
- unlocked desk drawers and filing cabinets to relieve your "boredom"?
- I suspect not. However, why is it that people without a justifiable
- *need* think it is "okay" to "wander about" a computer system? This
- is really tantamount to the same act as rifling desks and filing
- cabinets, but without the same risk of detection.
-
- > I feel the need to let them know about the gaping (and I mean gaping)
- > computer and physical security holes they have, but I'm not sure about
- > the best way to approach it (or even if I should).
-
- I suspect your "need" is born of the guilt of trespass. In my
- travels I have found that most people who *volunteer* information
- about security flaws in a manner which is not part of their regular
- job responsibilities are usually trying to hide something and I tend
- to be suspicious of their motives. Since you have not claimed to have
- held a system administrator function or management position, pointing
- out security flaws is not really your job responsibility. Security
- issues are a *sensitive* topic, and right or wrong, management does
- not usually appreciate unsolicited advice on this topic.
-
- > How do you think I should approach it?
- > [Moderator's Note: Well readers, what do *you* suggest? Post your
- > comments here, this person will see them. My suggestion was to simply
- > walk away and ignore it. The company would have to prove who was
- > responsible for any vandalism or hacking, etc. PT]
-
- I fully agree with the Moderator. Extending to you the
- benefit of the doubt that your motives are genuinely pristine and
- altruistic, this is NOT YOUR PROBLEM, and YOU WILL GET NO REWARD for
- disclosing this information to management. More likely than not,
- should you do elect to disclose the information, your action in doing
- so will make you a suspect for *something*.
-
- I would suggest that you chalk this up as one of life's many
- "lessons", get on with your career, and try not to get in the same
- situation a second time.
-
-
- Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. "Have you hugged your cat today?"
- UUCP: {boulder|decvax|rutgers|watmath}!acsu.buffalo.edu!kitty!larry
- TEL: 716/688-1231 || FAX: 716/741-9635 {utzoo|uunet}!/ \aerion!larry
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: fmsystm!macy@cwjcc.INS.CWRU.Edu
- Date: Mon May 14 10:01:56 1990
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Numbers
- Organization: F M Systems, Inc. Medina, Ohio USA +1 216 723-3000
-
-
- In article <7710@accuvax.nwu.edu> Tom Ace writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 347, Message 9 of 10
-
- >I'm going to be moving soon, and I'm considering getting a phone
- >number ending in -0000 at my new residence. I'm concerned about
- >"wrong numbers" and other unwanted calls;
-
- Didn't you read my article on our old 800-727-3000 number? I suggest
- you reconsider. And be sure ask if the number was assigned to a
- business before it was assigned to you. There are a few business that
- changes numbers once is a while to escape creditors ... and heaven
- help you if it was a fax or modem line before you got it.
-
- I suggest you get a number associated with a simple, nondescript
- word ... like 555-FONE or something ... how 'bout 555-UNIX...
-
- (I knew the outfit that had the number 800-F*CKYOU at one time. Boy,
- did they get some weird calls.)
-
- Some telephone operators still think that 00xx and 99xx numbers are
- pay-phones, too. This was a common telco assignment practice in the
- 60's and 70's.
-
-
- Macy M. Hallock, Jr. macy@ncoast.org uunet!aablue!fmsystm!macy
- F M Systems, Inc. {uunet|backbone}!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!fmsystm!macy
- 150 Highland Drive Voice: +1 216 723-3000 Ext 251 Fax: +1 216 723-3223
- Medina, Ohio 44256 USA Cleveland:273-3000 Akron:239-4994 (Dial 251 at tone)
- (Please note that our system name is "fmsystm" with no "e", .NOT. "fmsystem")
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Craig R. Watkins" <CRW@icf.hrb.com>
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers
- Date: 17 May 90 18:58:50 EST
- Organization: HRB Systems
-
-
- In article <7830@accuvax.nwu.edu>, gtolar@pro-europa.cts.com (Glynne
- Tolar) writes:
-
- > Speaking of easy phone numbers, just exactly how do you get them?
- > What does your phone company do?
-
- For most of the last ten years Bell of PA simply gave you whatever you
- wanted if they could. Within the last year I added a line and asked
- for the next number in sequence with my other lines. That was going
- to cost me $25 (one time charge, I think). I told them to forget it
- and they grabbed some other random number.
-
-
- Craig R. Watkins Internet: CRW@ICF.HRB.COM
- HRB Systems, Inc. Bitnet: CRW%HRB@PSUECL
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 16:54:11 PDT
- From: Jeremy Grodberg <jgro@apldbio.com>
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers
- Reply-To: jgro@apldbio.com (Jeremy Grodberg)
-
-
- In article <7830@accuvax.nwu.edu> gtolar@pro-europa.cts.com (Glynne
- Tolar) writes:
-
- >In-Reply-To: message from nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
-
- >Speaking of easy phone numbers, just exactly how do you get them?
-
- In San Francisco, PacBell will let you specify any number that is
- unused from any exchange in your area, for $5 setup and $1.50/month.
- That's how I got my number. I gave the phone co. a list of literally
- 50 numbers, and they found that my *45th* choice was available. Note
- that for free, they give you a choice of three numbers that they
- supply.
-
- In Rochester, NY, RochTel would not even listen to you ask for a
- number, saying that under no circumstances were they allowed to let a
- residence customer pick his number. They may let business customers
- pick numbers.
-
- BTW, A friend of mine got the number 221-2212, and later changed it
- since he averaged more than one "wrong number" per day (usually some
- three-year old playing with the phone).
-
-
- Jeremy Grodberg
- jgro@apldbio.com "Beware: free advice is often overpriced!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu 17 May 90 09:39:19-PDT
- From: "Ole J. Jacobsen" <OLE@csli.stanford.edu>
- Subject: Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing?
-
-
- A simple and cheap way to add "visual aid" to a telephone is to use a
- neon-type lamp, like the ones in night-lights. You see these used as
- message lights in hotel phones. It's not bright but it works if you
- can see the phone. You can get these frobs at Radio Shack for probably
- less than a dollar. Simply connect it accross the phone line. The
- resistance is huge, the current draw extremely low, it's magic.
-
-
- Ole
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Marvin Jones <optilink!jones@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing?
- Date: 17 May 90 18:07:49 GMT
- Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
-
-
- In article <7854@accuvax.nwu.edu>, pjd@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu
- (Peter J. Dotzauer) writes:
-
- > Is there a device that can be connected to a telephone or a telephone
- > line that causes a light bulb to blink, whenever the telephone rings?
-
- > [Moderator's Note: Radio Shack has various devices like this, as do
- > most telephone supply catalogs, and phone center stores. PT]
-
- What everyone here in "cubicle-land" does is to purchase a neon panel
- lamp assembly (as used for AC power "on" indicators on projects) and
- wire it in parallel with the phone. At normal 48 volts, the lamp is
- inactive. But the 90 volt ringing is enough to trigger the neon bulb.
- Pretty straightforward.
-
- This is so popular in cubicle offices because everyone's phones sound
- the same! Arrggh! This way, you can look across the room and see if
- your little light is flashing, and can then do a directed call
- pick-up.
-
- === Marvin Jones === Optilink Corp. === Petaluma, CA === 707.795.9444 X206 ===
- === UUCP: {uunet, tekbspa, pyramid, pixar}!optilink!jones ====================
- === CIS: 71320,3637 or 71320.3637@compuserve.com === AOL: mjones
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #360
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa06975;
- 18 May 90 13:03 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa25494;
- 18 May 90 3:19 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab15230;
- 18 May 90 2:16 CDT
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 1:20:12 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #361
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005180120.ab11770@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Fri, 18 May 90 01:20:05 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 361
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [Julian Macassey]
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [Jeremy Grodberg]
- Re: Connection of a British Phone Outside Britain [Stephen Tell]
- Re: Use of US Phone in India [Subodh Bapat]
- Re: Online CCITT Standards [John R. Covert]
- Re: Phone Conferences [Tom Lowe]
- Re: "Hello Sweetheart, Get Me An Area Code" [Dave Levenson]
- Re: I Have No Default Long Distance Carrier [John Higdon]
- New Sprint Promotion [Steve Baumgarten]
- Telebit vs. Sprint [John R. Levine]
- The Ultimate T-T Voice-Response System [Larry Lippman]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Julian Macassey <julian@bongo.uucp>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
- Date: 18 May 90 04:06:44 GMT
- Organization: The Hole in the Wall Hollywood California U.S.A.
-
-
- In article <7829@accuvax.nwu.edu>, gtnetdc@prism.gatech.edu (David
- Carter) writes:
-
- > In addition to the useful suggestions that Julian Macassey made in his
- > followup posting, it has been mentioned here previously (and I have
- > observed firsthand) that if you have multiple phone lines on a multi
- > pair cable, and you use one line for fax or modem, you will probably
- > be able to hear it faintly when you use another line for voice at the
- > same time. If you think this might bother you at all (it did me),
- > then run separate cables. Perhaps two two-pair cables to each room, or
- > more. Multiple modem/fax lines don't *seem* to interfere with each
- > other, but with higher data rate devices (e.g. 19200 bps or even ISDN)
- > this might become a problem.
-
- > Make sure the pairs are twisted! This definitely will improve the
- > crosstalk and noise problems. You may have to peel back the jacket to
- > verify that the pairs are twisted.
-
- I just couldn't let this pass. If you have twisted pair cable,
- you can run anything down it. Consider this. Having a 9600 baud modem,
- a FAX and a regular POTS phone run down some 3 pair wiring in your
- house for say 150 feet max. This should work fine, it does for people
- all the time. If you get cross talk from doing that I suggest you are
- not using twisted pair but quad. I said don't use quad. If 150 feet of
- twisted pair in the same sheath causes crosstalk, how the hell does it
- not cause crosstalk for the next 16,000 feet while it goes in a cable
- with hundreds more pairs to the Central Office?
-
- So use twisted pair, not quad. Quad may cause crosstalk and
- noise. How do you tell the difference? Quad is usually RED, GREEN,
- YELLOW and BLACK wire. It is not twisted, it is the usual wire
- installed in houses. Twisted pair usually uses the standard Telco
- color code, white/blue, white/orange/ white/green. It is usually 3
- pair minimum, yes I have seen two pair, it is very rare.
-
- Yes, I do know something about this and yes only yesterday I
- was running four wire 9600 baud data and Broadcast telephone call in
- audio down the same 25 pair cable. You can be sure I really checked
- those. I really checked for noise, I even had the phone line through a
- PA amp feeding a speaker. No modem noise. Those wires ran together
- down a 25 pair for 150 feet, then into the telco closet where they
- went into a monster 300 pair cable and half a mile to the CO. Yes, I
- do have noise problems with the CO, they are working on it. But the
- cable to the CO is good.
-
-
- In article<7837@accuvax.nwu.edu> Richard Kovalcik <rk@athena.mit.edu>
- writes:
-
- > A builder I trust says that he always pulls two quad phone cables. He
- > says that running two lines on one quad or 6-wire cable leads to cross
- > talk. This is something you might want to consider ...
-
- Please ask the builder to use twisted pair. If quad beat cross
- talk it would be used by telephone people for that purpose as well as
- builders. The phone company brings its wires to your builders
- construction sites via twisted pair.
-
-
- Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo.info.com ucla-an!denwa!bongo!julian
- N6ARE@K6IYK (Packet Radio) n6are.ampr.org [44.16.0.81] voice (213) 653-4495
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 16:45:01 PDT
- From: Jeremy Grodberg <jgro@apldbio.com>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
- Reply-To: jgro@apldbio.com (Jeremy Grodberg)
-
-
- Actually, I would suggest using Belden *shielded* twisted pair,
- many-pair. Although you'll get different color codes, you won't have
- problems with cross talk, and you can even use the wire to hook up
- intercoms, remote stereos, whatever. The Belden "Beld-foil" gives
- excellent shielding yet is easy to work with and not too expensive.
-
-
- Jeremy Grodberg
- jgro@apldbio.com "Beware: free advice is often overpriced!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: tell@oscar.cs.unc.edu (Stephen Tell)
- Subject: Re: Connection of a British Phone Outside Britain
- Date: 18 May 90 00:30:06 GMT
- Reply-To: tell@oscar.cs.unc.edu (Stephen Tell)
- Organization: University Of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
-
-
- In article <7832@accuvax.nwu.edu> julian@bongo.uucp (Julian Macassey)
- writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 354, Message 11 of 11
-
- >In the US, a standard gong
- >ringer is assigned a "Ringer Equivalence Number" of 1. A standard
- >phone line will ring 5 of these ringers or an REN of 5. Some
- >electronic ringers have RENs of 0.5 etc so you can usually get more of
- >these on the line than gongs.
-
- What is the conversion factor between RENs and somthing your average
- EE can understand, like "milliamps at 90vrms, 20Hz?"
-
- I've been thinking about how to build a ring generator for some
- homebrew-PBX experiments, and would like to know how much current I
- need to put out per phone.
-
-
- Steve Tell tell@wsmail.cs.unc.edu CS Grad Student, UNC Chapel Hill.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Subodh Bapat <mailrus!uflorida!rm1!bapat@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Use of US Phone in India
- Date: Wed, 16 May 90 9:43:03 EDT
-
-
- In article <7577@accuvax.nwu.edu>, WSHIRLEY@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
-
- > Will a cheapy speakerphone which draws its amps from the
- > phone line work in India?
-
- Yes, the current ratings are generallly the same, although you will
- need one of those adapters to convert the RJ11 jack to the two-pin
- twisted pair outlets common in India. If your speakerphone has
- higher-than- normal power requirements in the US, however, its
- behavior elsewhere may be unpredictable.
-
- > Does India use the same pulse/tones that we do?
-
- Pulse yes, tone no.
-
-
- Subodh Bapat novavax!rm1!bapat@uunet.uu.net OR bapat@rm1.uucp
- MS E-204, P.O.Box 407044, Racal-Milgo, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33340 (305) 846-6068
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 06:31:10 PDT
- From: "John R. Covert 17-May-1990 0931" <covert@covert.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: Re: Online CCITT Standards
-
-
- >are there absolutely NO FTPable CCITT standards?
-
- Of course not. CCITT, ECMA, ISO, ANSI, BSI, DIN, ... standards are
- copyrighted and sold at a price high enough to help pay the
- administrative costs of the standard organizations staff.
-
-
- /john
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: Phone Conferences
- Date: 17 May 90 09:07:17 EDT (Thu)
- From: Tom Lowe <tel@cdsdb1.att.com>
-
-
- AT&T has a conference service called Alliance Teleconferencing. It
- isn't a talkline in the sense that you call in and talk to several
- other random callers. It is designed for small to large conference
- calls (Up to fifty or more locations can be handled at once). They
- have several ways to do it ... one is on demand..i.e. you call their
- number and a speech response system talks you through setting up the
- conference.
-
- If you have a large conference, you can reserve however many ports you
- are going to need so that you are guaranteed to have them available at
- the time you want. Or you can reserve a a 'Meet Me' conference where
- you give all the people you want in the conference a special phone
- number to dial at a specific time. They call that number and are
- automatically added to the conference. This can be at your expense or
- theirs. An attendant can place all the calls to the locations for you
- if you like. Also, for all types of conferences, the controller can
- request an attendant for assistance at any time (I think). I'm sure
- there are other options and features that I forgot or don't know
- about.
-
- I don't know anything about prices, capacities, etc. I just know this
- stuff as a frequent user.
-
- To access the service, call:
- 0-700-456-1000 (yes, that's a 0 first, and it's a 700 number)
- If AT&T is NOT your default carrier, dial 10288-0-700-456-1000
-
- For Alliance information, call 1-800-662-3499. This is a speech
- response system that will give you all sorts of information about
- using it, as well as a opportunity to request a brochure. Call It!
-
- (These are my opinions and statements. They are unofficial and
- possibly wrong. PLEASE CALL 1-800-662-3499 BEFORE USING ALLIANCE!!!!!)
-
-
- Tom Lowe
- tel@cdsdb1.ATT.COM
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dave Levenson <dave%westmark@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: "Hello Sweetheart, Get Me An Area Code"
- Date: 17 May 90 21:46:34 GMT
- Organization: Westmark, Inc., Warren, NJ, USA
-
-
- In article <7795@accuvax.nwu.edu>, dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (David Tamkin) writes:
-
- > Perhaps it is impossible on the equipment in use in those CDO's, and
- > perhaps the need for prefixes in area code 216 is not critical enough
- > to change subscribers' telephone numbers over it, but I've noticed
- > that sharing prefixes is apparently possible. It beats me how other
- > switches know where to route a call to a split prefix, since when I've
- > asked how to tell before dialing where the number is served (say, by
- > blocks of consecutive numbers assigned to one office or the other),
- > the answer from the provider has always been a synonym of "duh".
-
- In some cases, the local service is provided not by a CDO but by an
- RSM, a Remote Switch Module, which acts like a single frame of a CO
- but connected remotely. All of the intelligence is in the host CO,
- but the local battery and tone plant, and some concentration, and
- originating register equipment is located near the served subscribers.
- In this case, the prefix belongs to the host CO and it decides based
- upon the directory number, whether the call goes to a
- directly-connected subscriber or an RSM-connected subscriber.
-
- In other cases, a tandem switch somewhere must be smart enough to
- perform translation on more than the prefix, if multiple end-offices
- use the same prefix.
-
-
- Dave Levenson Voice: 201 647 0900 Fax: 201 647 6857
- Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave
- Warren, NJ, USA AT&T Mail: !westmark!dave
- [The Man in the Mooney]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: I Have No Default Long Distance Carrier
- Date: 17 May 90 20:44:32 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Alex Pournelle <elroy!grian!alex@ames.arc.nasa.gov> writes:
-
- > Umm, do they still charge you for that "optional" "non-basic"
- > long-distance tariff? Now, is it just me, or would this kind of
- > billing throw lawsuits around the magistrate's corner office in any
- > other field? Yeah, the basic rate is $9.00 or whatever per month--but
- > you can't have it without the ($3 and climbing) long-distance add-on!
-
- > Or am I wrong -- and there is a way, with enough patience and coaching
- > of the P*bell 811-SUCKERS girls, to order up a "local only" line?
-
- I swear, the biggest mistake of the decade was to include the words,
- "long distance" in the MFJ-mandated surcharge name. It seems like
- every other week someone refers to it as though it was some kind of
- charge for some specific service (usually long distance), and that if
- you could cancel this service (long distance), you could avoid the
- charge.
-
- The FCC surcharge (currently $3.00 per line) is to protect the profits
- of the local telco. It is not for "equal access service". It is not so
- that you can make calls outside of your LATA. It is not so that you
- can receive long distance calls. It has NOTHING to do with long
- distance. You cannot avoid the charge. You must pay it. If the line
- has dial tone, it has "the charge". It was NEVER optional.
-
- This is the charge. This is the charge on your phone. Any questions?
- [With apologies to Partnership for a Drug-Free America.]
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu May 17 23:12:04 1990
- From: Steve Baumgarten <baumgart@esquire.dpw.com>
- Reply-To: baumgart@esquire.dpw.com
- Subject: New Sprint Promotion
- Organization: Davis Polk & Wardwell
-
-
- Anyone see the "1 Free Month" Sprint commercials on television yet?
- There was so much fine print that it wasn't exactly clear what it was
- they were offering you, although there's no doubt that one month of
- unlimited long distance calling for no charge is definitely not it.
-
- (How naive do they think we are, anyway? I mean, we're all veterans
- of the fabulous WD-40 promotion, right?)
-
- Has anyone found out any more about this promotion yet? Maybe we
- should start a Sprint promotion pool: everyone kicks in a buck and the
- person who guesses the most restrictions and gotchas wins. I'll
- start:
-
- 1. "One month" means one "average" month, meaning:
- 2. you won't see any kind of refund until your third bill
- (at least).
-
- Maybe it's really what it sounds like; I mean, they're not allowed to
- lie on TV, right?
-
- - Steve Baumgarten
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- baumgart@esquire.dpw.com
-
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: In fairness to Sprint, when my third bill arrived a
- few days ago it had eight dollars and some change credited for one
- hour of calling plus applicable tax. I now have a credit balance on my
- FON card. Regards this latest promotion, perhaps a 'free month' means
- they are going to start some sort of monthly service charge or
- handling charge, and respondents to the television ad, calling via a
- 900 number, will get the service charge waived the first month. :) PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 0:11:48 EDT
- From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us>
-
-
- I used to think my needs were simple: I have a computer here in
- Cambridge that needs to talk uucp to a friend in Santa Monica CA. We
- each have a Telebit modem. Until recently, I was using Sprint quite
- sucessfully. I gather that Sprint has installed a bunch of new echo
- suppressors which are misconfigured in a way that clobbers a Telebit,
- in any event my uucp throughput in PEP mode recently dropped from 850
- cps to 210. OK, no problem, it's a competitive world, I told the
- modem to dial 10222 to use MCI, but throughput is no better. It's
- still OK with AT&T, but they don't give me the multi-line volume
- discounts I get from Sprint.
-
- Can anyone suggest a way to persuade Sprint to clean up their act? I
- saw the note from the person who administers an enormous corporate
- account and got instant action, but I'm just a normal little
- $100/month subscriber. Arrgh.
-
-
- Regards,
- John
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: The Ultimate T-T Voice-Response Message
- Date: 18 May 90 00:28:09 EDT (Fri)
- From: Larry Lippman <kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net>
-
- As an amusing commentary on the increasing use of voice response
- systems with touch-tone entry, imagine the following auto-attendant
- message:
-
- "Thank you for calling Nine One One. If you are calling from a
- touch-tone telephone and your house is on fire please press 1 now. If
- you require an ambulance press 2. If your house is being burglarized
- press 3 ..."
-
- :-)
-
- Credit for the above actually belongs to a reader of the
- newsgroup misc.emerg-services; I am ashamed to admit that I
- inadvertently deleted the file containing the original author's name.
-
-
- Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. "Have you hugged your cat today?"
- UUCP: {boulder|decvax|rutgers|watmath}!acsu.buffalo.edu!kitty!larry
- TEL: 716/688-1231 || FAX: 716/741-9635 {utzoo|uunet}!/ \aerion!larry
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #361
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa13430;
- 19 May 90 3:04 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa12023;
- 19 May 90 1:27 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa07063;
- 19 May 90 0:22 CDT
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 23:26:36 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #362
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005182326.ab10922@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Fri, 18 May 90 23:26:35 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 362
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Long Distance Calls at Local Rate in Denmark [Per G|tterup]
- AT&T's Software Defined Network [John R. Covert]
- Request for Info on AT&T's SDN [John Koontz]
- Non-Cellular Mobile Phones [Will Martin]
- Banks Charge Universal Card Violates Laws [Steve Baumgarten]
- Deep Discounts on LD Calls [TELECOM Moderator]
- Administrivia: Lost Messages [TELECOM Moderator]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Per G|tterup <ballerup@diku.dk>
- Subject: Long Distance Calls at Local Rate in Denmark
- Organization: Department Of Computer Science, University Of Copenhagen
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 08:42:46 GMT
-
-
- Until recently when the Danish telcos expanded the areacodes from
- 01-09 to real two-digit numbers, you could make a long distance call
- at the rate of a local call by simply dialing your own areacode first
- before you dialed the recipient's number (including his/her real
- areacode).
-
- Example: Being in area 01 (Copenhagen) and wanting to dial someone in
- Aarhus (areacode 06) you simply dialed 01-06 XX XX XX (local six digit
- number).
-
- It worked everywhere, even from all kinds of payphones etc. and was
- only disabled when the areacode change came (Jan 2, 1990), and then
- probably only because they had to make drastic changes at the
- exchanges. It had been pos- sible for a very long time (10-15 years or
- more?) and it survived the half- way change of making the (old)
- areacode mandatory even on local calls.
-
- It also worked on international calls (I'm told) and they're (were)
- usually very expensive, something like $2-$5 per minute! - It has
- become somewhat cheaper now - A call to USA would then have been at a
- rate of $2.35 per minute, now it's only $1.45 per minute ... (all day
- and night).
-
- I wonder just how much revenue was lost due to this little trick,
- because everybody knew about it, maybe just except the people at the
- telcos!
-
- This could also be the reason why calls and subscription are more than
- twice as expensive as the rest of Europe or US!
-
- Note: Even though the instructions on the payphones say: Pick up the
- handset, insert coins, dial - You didn't have to insert anything until
- the call went through (the recipients phone started ringing).
-
-
- Hi from Per, an eager reader in Denmark (soon moving to US)
-
- | Per Gotterup | "The most mercifull thing in the |
- | Student, DIKU (Inst. of Comp. Sci.) | world, I think, is the inability |
- | University of Copenhagen, Denmark | of the human mind to correlate all |
- | Internet: ballerup@freja.diku.dk | its contents." - H.P. Lovecraft - |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 05:45:45 PDT
- From: "John R. Covert 18-May-1990 0847" <covert@covert.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: AT&T's Software Defined Network
-
-
- >But I'm wondering about "Software Defined Network"... Has ATT just
- >figured out how to use software to configure their network? Why are
- >they boasting about something which is old news?
-
- What they're boasting about is using software to define _your_ private
- network. This is a new offering.
-
- Many companies have private networks where offices all over the world
- are accessible on a seven digit basis using an internal numbering
- scheme. The company's PBXs define the network, i.e. which tie lines
- to use, or, in some cases (with sophisticated enough PBXs), public
- network translations for the numbers.
-
- The problem has always been how to support very small offices, offices
- too small to have a PBX capable of handling these translations, or how
- to help people on the road with translations of seven digit internal
- numbers to the full public network number.
-
- Enter SDN. With SDN, AT&T will provide you switched private network
- traffic, with your own private numbering plan. There are several
- access methods:
-
- 1. Dedicated trunks to the nearest toll switch (in and out).
- 2. Regular trunks from your local telco, with AT&T/SDN (10732)
- as your default carrier. On net calls are dialled with NPA 700.
- 3. An 800 number which accepts an SDN calling card and translates
- the resulting call with your private network's translations.
-
- /john
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: John Koontz <john@vsi.com>
- Subject: Request for Info on AT&T's SDN
- Date: 18 May 90 17:31:52 GMT
- Organization: V-Systems, Inc. -- Santa Ana, CA
-
-
- Does anyone know anything about AT&T's Software Defined Network (SDN)
- One Plus Services? A friend of mine went to a presentation by a
- company called Paragon Communications (out of Van Nuys, California)
- and their agent Aracorp about how reps can earn big $$s by signing up
- companies to switch over to AT&T's SDN. Paragon will pay reps 5% of
- the long distance bill of anyone they can sign up for 48 months.
-
- Before my friends quits her job, I'd be interested in learning more
- about this service and Paragon/Aracorp. Can anyone enlighten me?
- Type slowly, I'm not fluent in Telecom.
-
-
- John Koontz, V-Systems, Inc. +1 714 545 6442
- {attmail uunet}!vsi!john john@vsi.com
- "Sometimes I wish Natural Selection worked faster."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 10:56:11 CDT
- From: Will Martin <wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil>
- Subject: Non-Cellular Mobile Phones
-
-
- What is the situation these days with non-cellular mobile phones, the
- ones that had been around for decades and worked in the VHF range? It
- was my understanding that one of the primary motivations for the
- development of cell-phone technology was the fact that those VHF
- allocations for mobile phone use were terribly overcrowded in many
- metropolitan areas (during the business day, I suppose), and that to
- get a new mobile phone was practically impossible in those regions --
- there was a long waiting list and new phones could only be activated
- if old ones were removed from service.
-
- There are still many areas of the country where there is no cellular
- coverage, and rural areas probably will never get cellular
- installations, due to the low number of likely customers. So there
- still is a need for the VHF mobile-phone service. However, I would
- also have expected that many people with VHF mobile phones who used
- them only within metropolitan areas would have switched over to
- cellular. This would have freed up a lot of capacity in that service,
- so that those people who really needed the VHF mobiles could get them.
-
- Am I right in this supposition? What is the VHF mobile phone
- availability situation now? Are these services provided only by the
- BOC's and equivalent telcos, or are there independents in this area,
- the way there are in cellular phone service? Does it appear that VHF
- mobile phones will continue to be available in the future, or are they
- being phased out in some areas? Are there still areas where VHF
- mobile phone service is "saturated" and there are still waiting lists
- to get them?
-
- How do the economics of the two systems compare, both in the costs of
- operation to the service provider, and in the cost to the user (both
- in the initial equipment installation, and in the per-call or monthly
- billing charges)?
-
- I get the impression that cellular costs much more in the way of
- hardware to the cellular company, what with the need to install the
- separate cells' towers, antennae, and electronics, but then the
- operation is just about all automatic. The VHF systems have less
- hardware costs, being a relatively simple mobile-radio setup, but are
- not as automated, requiring human operator intervention, and thus have
- higher continuing operational expenses. Is this correct?
-
- Does anyone make user hardware that combines the two technologies, or
- does someone who needs to access both versions (such as a salesperson
- who covers a range of urban and rural accounts) need to have two
- mobile phone installations in his/her vehicle -- one VHF and one
- cellular?
-
- From the user's point of view, are there any technical or operational
- advantages to the older VHF system versus cellular, or is it always in
- the user's best interest to switch from VHF to cellular if it is
- available and serves the areas they travel in?
-
- I assume there are stretches of the West and maybe mountainous areas
- in other parts of the country where there is no access to either VHF
- or cellular phone service. Is there enough market in these regions,
- all put together, to give an incentive for some other mobile-phone
- technology, such as using satellites, to be developed and installed? I
- seem to recall reading mentions of some sort of phone service being
- tied in with the Global Positioning Satellites (GPS) or other
- equivalent satellite-based locator-type services. What is the
- situation in this area? Would this eventually replace the VHF mobile
- phone systesm, or only supplement them? Does anyone foresee a time
- when there will be no more VHF mobiles?
-
-
- Regards, Will Martin
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri May 18 09:04:38 1990
- From: Steve Baumgarten <baumgart@esquire.dpw.com>
- Reply-To: baumgart@esquire.dpw.com
- Subject: Banks Charge Universal Card Violates Laws
- Organization: Davis Polk & Wardwell
-
-
- Excerpted from {The New York Times}, Friday May 18, 1990, Page D1:
-
- The American Telephone and Telegraph Company's complex
- arrangements to sponsor a bank credit card are drawing criticism
- from rivals in the business.
-
- In the last several days, four large banks have filed protests
- with Federal and state regulators, arguing that the terms of the
- company's sponsorship of the card violates banking and
- communications laws.
-
- The A.T.&T. Universal card is a telephone calling card and general
- purpose credit card. The Universal Bank, a subsidiary of the
- Synovous Financial Corporation in Columbus, Ga., has issued the
- card in Visa and Mastercard versions.
-
- [ ... ]
-
- At the end of each day, A.T.&T. buys from Universal all the
- charges, telephone and otherwise, made by card users. The company
- then bills thee customers, charging them interest and lates fees
- if they delay or skip payments.
-
- Citicorp, the Chase Manhattan Bank, the BankAmerica Corporation,
- and the Maryland National Bank have asked the Federal Reserve
- Board, the Federal Communications Commission and the Georgia
- Banking Department to investigate A.T.&T.'s relationship with
- Universal.
-
- James L. Bailey, the group executive who heads the domestic credit
- card operations of Citibank, said his company was concerned that
- A.T.&T. was in effect an affiliate of Universal and was
- essentially issuing the credit cards itself.
-
- "The bank is solely a funding vehicle for an unregulated
- affiliate," he said. "They have set up a system where the
- regulators have no control over who is taking the risk."
-
- The banks want an investigation to insure that A.T.&T. is
- competing on equal terms, he said.
-
- [ ... ]
-
- A.T.&T. [maintains that its] legal position [...] is similar to
- that of the several thousand athletic teams, charitable
- organizations and other corporations that sponsor Mastercard and
- Visa cards.
-
- Universal has four employees and $3 million in assets, which is
- small for an operation that could issue five million cards, Mr.
- Bailey said [...].
-
- The banks, which rank among the nation's five largest issuers of
- bank cards, say that A.T.&T. controls Universal Bank without
- having obtained the Federal Reserve Board's permission to become a
- bank holding company. The banks also say that A.T.&T. or
- Universal should have made a tariff filing with the F.C.C. before
- offering reduced rates on credit card calls and before charging
- interest and late fees on bills that may include charges for these
- calls.
-
- [ ... ]
-
- The banks also argue that Universal is effectively reselling
- telecommunications services in violation of its charter. Universal
- pays A.T.&T. the full rate for long-distance credit card calls and
- then bills customers for 90 percent of the amount.
-
- The banks say that A.T.&T. is indirectly compensating Universal
- for the 10 percent discount.
-
- A.T.&T. does not control Universal because it holds no stock in
- the company [...]. Universal is not reselling telecommunications
- services because it is not buying capacity on the A.T.&T. network
- [according company executives].
-
- Elgie Holstein, the executive director of Bank Card Holders of
- America, a consumer group based in Herndon, Va., suggested that
- the banks might be seeking to restrict entry into one of their
- most profitable markets. The same big banks have been buying the
- credit card portfolios of smaller rivals, and their complaints
- that A.T.&T.'s actions may be unfair or anticompetitive are "a bit
- like being called ugly by a frog," he said.
-
- [End excerpt]
-
- Mr. Holstein has a point; a friend (who works for Citicorp) and I
- have, over the past few years, made a game of finding and reporting
- all the regulatory violations in which Citibank engages, purposefully
- and not. To their credit, when we tell them that, for example,
- regulations prohibit unlimited transfers to and from Insured Money
- Market accounts, they usually bring themselves into compliance with
- the law.
-
- But these banks didn't become the country- and world-spanning monsters
- they are without, shall we say, stretching some of the interstate
- banking regulations to the breaking point. That AT&T now wants to hop
- on the gravy train of extortionist interest rates and 2% merchant fees
- is not surprising, and although Citibank claims that the Universal
- card hasn't diminished the number of applicants for Citibank's own
- cards, it's interesting to note that there was a distinct lack of
- interest on the part of these banks when Sears decided to get itself
- into the credit card business several years ago with Discover.
-
- Of course, Discover has until this year lost an incredible sum of
- money, and at the time it was introduced it had neither a substantial
- merchant nor customer base. But AT&T managed, within the first few
- months, to snatch a quarter of a million potential or current
- customers away from these banks, and now that it looks like they have
- some competition for the first time in quite a while, they sound very
- nervous indeed.
-
- But if *I* were Citibank, I don't think I'd ever pick up the phone and
- call the Fed about *anything*...
-
- (Maybe it was an anonymous tip -- unless of course the Fed has Caller
- ID... :-)
-
-
- Steve Baumgarten
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- baumgart@esquire.dpw.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 2:09:01 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Deep Discounts on LD Calls
-
-
- An advertisement mailed to me recently offers 'deep discounts of up to
- fifty percent while using major carriers'. They offer rates 'as low as
- thirteen cents per minute, 24 hours per day nationwide'.
-
- In addition, they offer a flat rate travel card, and a flat rate
- voicemail service using an 800 number.
-
- They will send a 'free discount rate kit' to all potential BUSINESS
- customers upon request. They say that no orders can be processed
- without a telephone number, apparently so that someone can call you
- back with specifics and to sign you up, etc.
-
- Western Telecom
- 1544 West Peralta Avenue
- Mesa, AZ 85202
-
- Phone: 1-800-223-7592 Ext: 322-1051
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 2:22:12 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Administrivia: Lost Messages
-
-
- Two or three messages in the inbound queue were lost prior to
- publication early Friday morning. I cannot reconstruct them. If you
- received an autoreply from me time-stamped in the 11 PM (5/17) through
- 2:00 AM (5/18) time period, and your message has NOT appeared in this
- issue of the Digest or one of the Friday morning issues, then you
- should presume it was lost, and resubmit it. Sorry.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #362
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa13528;
- 19 May 90 3:07 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab12023;
- 19 May 90 1:30 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab07063;
- 19 May 90 0:23 CDT
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 0:02:27 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #363
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005190002.ab21428@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sat, 19 May 90 00:02:31 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 363
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Telco Billing Brings Surprises [David Tamkin]
- Re: Telco Billing Brings Surprises [John R. Covert]
- Re: Telco Billing Brings Surprises [Joel B. Levin]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [John Higdon]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Dave Mc Mahan]
- Re: New Sprint Promotion [William C. DenBesten]
- Re: New Sprint Promotion [Joel B. Levin]
- Re: Sprint Card / WD40 Update [Chris Jones]
- Re: Sprint Outage -- Fiber Cut in Massachusetts [Dick Jackson]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: David Tamkin <dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: Telco Billing Brings Surprises
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 1:53:51 CDT
-
-
- Mark Earle wrote in volume 10, issue 359:
-
- | This month, I received a few surprises in my phone bill from
- | Southwestern Bell Telephone company.
-
- | Page 8 had the MCI [------- line out of the M logo, and billed me
- | $1.95 for a one minute collect call. For a call (to me at area code
- | 512) from area code 316, Garden City, KS. I remember sleepily answering
- | and accepting this call, even though it turned out to be a wrong number.
-
- | On this line, ITT/Metromedia (LDS) is my default 1+ carrier. How does
- | MCI enter into this?
-
- The caller selects the carrier. If someone dials 0 512 855 XXXX or 00
- from a coin phone or a private phone where MCI is the primary carrier
- or dials 10222 0 512 855 XXXX or 1022200 from a phone where MCI
- accepts 10XXX dialing, the call will be placed via MCI. (I'm not sure
- whether it is 1022200 or 102220; it is 102880 for an AT&T operator but
- 1033300 for a US Sprint operator, unless one of them is your primary
- carrier and thus is reachable with 00.)
-
- When the MCI operator called to ask whether you would accept the
- charges for a call from whoever it was, the operator should have
- identified himself or herself as "the MCI operator." At least, in my
- experience, MCI operators have made it clear who they are on collect
- calls.
-
- | 1.95 for one minute?!!!!!!! This was at 9:23 pm local time on April 16.
- | (Monday evening local time).
-
- That's an easy one! $1.80 surcharge for an operator assisted call
- plus 15c for one minute at evening rates from Garden City to Corpus
- Christi.
-
- | The number listed for MCI Communications billing inquiries is
- | 1-951-7009, a free call. This is the SAME number listed elsewhere in
- | the bill for problems with AT&T AND SWB billing questions.
-
- It's SWBT's number. They handle your local bill, no matter what
- companies they are collecting for. If there is a problem, it affects
- the amount of money Southwestern Bell expects from you and, if it's
- over a charge from an LD carrier or AOS, it affects how much money the
- carrier or AOS can expect from SWBT. If there is a dispute over how
- much money you will remit to SWBT, SWBT needs to know.
-
- | I do intend to inquire about how MCI ended up billing me. I would have
- | thought that MY choice of LD carrier would "win". At this point, I
- | suspect the calling person had MCI as their default.
-
- I once was under instructions to place a collect call to an MCI
- office. My default carrier is Telecom*USA, so I decided to see what
- would happen. The MCI employee was away from her desk and had her
- answering machine on, so the Telecom*USA operator told me to try
- later. When I tried later I had lost my nerve, so I dialed
- 102220-NPA-NNX-XXXX and placed it through MCI. So call me chicken.
- Cluck cluck.
-
- Tell SWBT that it was a wrong number. You were sleepy and the name
- sounded like that of a relative, so you accepted the call but it
- turned out to be a total stranger who had a wrong number. They should
- credit you for $1.95 plus applicable taxes and charge it back to MCI.
-
-
- David Tamkin Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 708-518-6769 312-693-0591
- dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 06:07:51 PDT
- From: "John R. Covert 18-May-1990 0904" <covert@covert.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: Re: Telco Billing Brings Surprises
-
-
- >Page 8 had the MCI ... logo, and billed me $1.95 for a one minute
- >collect call. ... I remember sleepily answering and accepting this
- >call, even though it turned out to be a wrong number.
- >I guess I'm liable, since I *did* accept it.
-
- Nope, in this great land of ours you're not ever liable for wrong
- numbers (except on 800 service, and then you've got _some_ leeway).
- Presumably you were told by the operator that this was a collect call
- from "Bill", and you thought you knew "Bill", but it turned out that
- it was a different "Bill" who had dialled a wrong number.
-
- >The number listed for MCI Communications billing inquiries is
- >1-951-7009, a free call. This is the SAME number listed elsewhere in
- >the bill for problems with AT&T AND SWB billing questions.
-
- Since MCI doesn't have an account open for you, they did the billing
- through your local telco; your local telco, as part of what MCI pays
- them to do billing, has also agreed to handle billing problems. Just
- call the number and tell them you misunderstood the name, and that it
- was a wrong number.
-
- >On this line, ITT/Metromedia (LDS) is my default 1+ carrier. How does
- >MCI enter into this? I suspect the calling person had MCI as their default.
-
- Correct.
-
- The carrier was determined by the caller. The caller dialled 0+ from
- an MCI equipped line, or explicitly dialled 10222+0+. MCI handled the
- call, on MCI lines, and you accepted it (before it turned out to be a
- wrong number).
-
- >1.95 for one minute?!!!!!!!
-
- Not that much more than what AT&T would have charged. AT&T has a
- $1.75 surcharge for the first minute on any 0+ collect call (and a
- $2.50 surcharge if you just dial "0" when you could have dialled
- "0+").
-
- /john
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Joel B. Levin" <levin@bbn.com>
- Subject: Re: Telco Billing Brings Surprises
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 12:12:49 EDT
-
-
- From: Mark Earle <mearle@pro-party.cts.com>
-
- >Page 8 had the MCI [------- line out of the M logo, and billed me
- >$1.95 for a one minute collect call. For a call (to me at area code
- >512) from area code 316, Garden City, KS.
-
- >On this line, ITT/Metromedia (LDS) is my default 1+ carrier. How does
- >MCI enter into this?
-
- The LD company was selected by the caller, irrespective of your
- default LD company.
-
- >[Moderator's Note: Admittedly, $1.95 for one minute seems like a
- >strange price, but remember, the call was handled by MCI, the company
- >which saves you money on your long distance bill....
-
- Even ATT charges higher for collect than for credit card calls. I
- don't feel we know enough about the call to judge; could it have been
- person- to-person? Me, I switched to Sprint. And for out-of-the-house
- calls, I now get my 10% discount with the ATT/Universal card.
-
- > ... I'm sitting here
- >trying to keep a straight face and not smirk as I type this. PT]
-
- And failing utterly to keep the smirk out of your fingers. :-)
-
-
- levin@bbn.com
- +1-617-873-3463
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 18 May 90 12:51:38 PDT (Fri)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- John R. Levine <johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> writes:
-
- > I gather that Sprint has installed a bunch of new echo
- > suppressors which are misconfigured in a way that clobbers a Telebit,
- > in any event my uucp throughput in PEP mode recently dropped from 850
- > cps to 210.
-
- I have learned indirectly through Pac*Bell that 2400 bps is the max
- that carriers consider to be required to pass through a standard
- dialup circuit. In other words, if you complain that the line quality
- is poor enough to inhibit 2400 bps transmission, they will fix it. If
- you complain that V.32 or PEP is having trouble, you may get waved
- off. A totally unsubstantiated rumor states that the carriers are
- doing this on purpose to get people to go for more expensive "data"
- service.
-
- When I had a uucp connection to a site in St. Marys, KS we used AT&T.
- Suddenly, the Telebit modems could not even complete a successful
- conversation. In our trouble shooting efforts, we talked over the
- circuit and it sounded fine. A call to AT&T got instant action. I got
- hourly updates and by that evening, everything was back to normal. All
- they told me was that there was some problem in the digital carrier
- and that the calls would be re-routed until the problem was corrected.
- We never had another problem, and we were not big-time customers but
- rather residential accounts.
-
- > Can anyone suggest a way to persuade Sprint to clean up their act? I
- > saw the note from the person who administers an enormous corporate
- > account and got instant action, but I'm just a normal little
- > $100/month subscriber. Arrgh.
-
- I would handle it in a straightforward manner. If anyone at Sprint
- seems uninterested, then tell them that AT&T seems to be more
- interested in their service to ALL of their customers. Sprint is very
- PR sensitive right now. As far as MCI goes, don't bother. They haven't
- a clue.
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dave Mc Mahan <claris!netcom!mcmahan@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 18 May 90 19:20:06 GMT
- Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System
-
-
- In article <7918@accuvax.nwu.edu> johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us
- (John R. Levine) writes:
-
- >Until recently, I was using Sprint quite
- >sucessfully. I gather that Sprint has installed a bunch of new echo
- >suppressors which are misconfigured in a way that clobbers a Telebit,
- >in any event my uucp throughput in PEP mode recently dropped from 850
- >cps to 210. OK, no problem, it's a competitive world, I told the
- >modem to dial 10222 to use MCI, but throughput is no better. It's
- >still OK with AT&T, but they don't give me the multi-line volume
- >discounts I get from Sprint.
-
- >Can anyone suggest a way to persuade Sprint to clean up their act? I
- >saw the note from the person who administers an enormous corporate
- >account and got instant action, but I'm just a normal little
- >$100/month subscriber. Arrgh.
-
- It's not Sprint or MCI, it's the Telebit. From my understanding,
- Telebit modems don't work worth squat when the signal is digitized.
- Seems that the digitizing screws up the phasing of the modem signal
- (why? I don't know) and AT&T uses analog all along the signal path.
- Just a side effect of the 'all fiber' types of network installations
- that Sprint brags about. I found out about this from an ex-roommate
- of mine that is a modem design engineer at Telebit. He was a bit hazy
- as to the exact reasons, but said that Telebit knows quite well about
- the effect. If there is interest, e-mail me and I'll ask him for a
- more detailed description of the problem causes and what Telebit plans
- on doing about it (if anything).
-
- Knowing the types of folk that hang out in this conference, I'm
- betting there will be several requests for more info and those that
- tell me I don't know what I'm talking about because THEY use 'xyz'
- setup with 'abc' as an alternate LD carrier with Telebits and it works
- fine. Your right, I'm not sure of the details, but can try to find
- out if interest is expressed.
-
-
- dave
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "William C. DenBesten" <bgsuvax!denbeste@cis.ohio-state.edu>
- Subject: Re: New Sprint Promotion
- Date: 18 May 90 15:28:23 GMT
- Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
-
-
- From article <7917@accuvax.nwu.edu>, by baumgart@esquire.dpw.com
- (Steve Baumgarten):
-
- > Anyone see the "1 Free Month" Sprint commercials on television yet?
- > 1. "One month" means one "average" month, meaning:
- > 2. you won't see any kind of refund until your third bill
-
- They kept mentioning $25.00, which I suspect is what they give you.
- The fine print said that the credit would appear on your _sixth_ bill.
-
-
- William C. DenBesten is denbeste@bgsu.edu or denbesten@bgsuopie.bitnet
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Joel B. Levin" <levin@bbn.com>
- Subject: Re: New Sprint Promotion
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 12:32:34 EDT
-
- From: Steve Baumgarten <baumgart@esquire.dpw.com>
-
- >Anyone see the "1 Free Month" Sprint commercials on television yet?
- >There was so much fine print that it wasn't exactly clear what it was
- >they were offering you, although there's no doubt that one month of
- >unlimited long distance calling for no charge is definitely not it.
-
- > 1. "One month" means one "average" month, meaning:
- > 2. you won't see any kind of refund until your third bill
- > (at least).
-
- I have never paid a lot of attention to their TV ads, but I watch
- their magazine and direct mail material. There the fine print is
- always that it really means a credit equal to so many hours of calling
- some distance at some time period (this is always spelled out, I just
- don't remember) to be credited to your bill. They also say when it
- will be credited.
-
- I switched to Sprint in part because their Sprint Plus looked
- reasonable (plus no monthly charge and a minimum I always exceed) and
- in part because they offered $25 free calling. This easily covered
- the $5 local switchover charge and was in fact credited on my January
- bill as they said it would be.
-
- Note that when ATT says they will pay your charge to switch over (or
- switch back) in one of their promotions, they also say in fine print
- that the credit will come three months later. They want to make sure
- you'll stay for a while at least!
-
- > ... Regards this latest promotion, perhaps a 'free month' means
- >they are going to start some sort of monthly service charge or
- >handling charge ... [moderator's note]
-
- I doubt it.
-
-
- levin@bbn.com
- +1-617-873-3463
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 14 May 90 10:55:46 EDT
- From: Chris Jones <ksr!clj@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Sprint Card / WD40 Update
- Organization: Kendall Square Research Corp
-
-
- In article <7694@accuvax.nwu.edu> Andy Malis) writes:
-
- >My third Sprint invoice just arrived, without the WD-40 60 free
- >minutes credit ... it would be posted to my account in ANOTHER three
- >months.
-
- >[Moderator's Note: I hate to say 'I told you so', but many issues ago
- >I said it was likely the third billing would come and go without the
- >credit promised unless users 'reminded' them to issue it.
-
- I've been following this discussion semi-interestedly, and when I was
- in a drug store this weekend I spotted a can of WD-40 with a little
- pamphlet attached to it. I pulled it off and read it. On one side it
- has a series of pictures and text describing uses of WD-40. On the
- other it says "CALL & COLLECT FREE wit WD-40: 60 minutes of
- long-distance phone calls." In fine print at the bottom of the third
- of four panels on this side is a footnote, which reads:
-
- "* The 60 minute free offer is for a credit equal to 60 minutes in
- interstate calling per account at the US Sprint 3,000 mile interstate
- night/weekend rate. Credit for surcharge not included. This offer is
- valid only for new FONCARD customers and may not be used in
- conjunction with any other promotion. Credit will be issued on the
- first month's invoice. The offer expires September 30, 1990."
- ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
- There seems to be some outright misrepresentation going on here.
-
-
- Chris Jones clj@ksr.com uunet!ksr!clj harvard!ksr!clj
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Outright misrepresentation? So what else is old?
- One reason -- perhaps the main reason -- the OCC's have flourished to
- the extent they have in the past ten years has been the general
- ignorance of the American public regarding how their phones work and
- why they work that way. For many, when the OCC telemarketer called,
- all they heard was the implied, 'get one over on AT&T' message. And
- anti-ATT feelings have been strong enough in the past that this
- implied message worked very well. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dick Jackson <jackson@ttidca.tti.com>
- Subject: Re: Sprint Outage -- Fiber Cut in Massachusetts
- Date: 18 May 90 14:51:19 GMT
- Organization: Citicorp/TTI, Santa Monica
-
-
- In article <7874@accuvax.nwu.edu> eli@pws.bull.com writes:
-
- >Sprint access from Boston is out as of 11:30 AM 5/17. Apparently
- >there is a fiber cut in Massachusetts somewhere. Also, a big Sprint
- >fiber in NJ was cut yesterday.
-
- I attended a presentation by Sprint about a year ago and pressed them
- on the diversity of their network. They got back to me with maps, and
- descriptions etc. showing that apparently they were diverse down to
- the interconnect with the LEC.
-
- I would be grateful if someone with deep knowledge of Sprint could
- explain the fiber cut in MA and how it resulted in service loss.
-
-
- Dick Jackson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #363
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa16078;
- 19 May 90 4:08 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa01748;
- 19 May 90 2:34 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ac12023;
- 19 May 90 1:30 CDT
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 0:47:23 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #364
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005190047.ab28217@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sat, 19 May 90 00:46:58 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 364
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing? [Rob Warnock]
- Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing? [Jim Rees]
- Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing? [Larry Lippman]
- Re: 900-STOPPER [David Tamkin]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Karl Denninger]
- Re: Use of US Phone in India [Sanjay Hiranandani]
- Re: Interesting DMS Trick [Wally Kramer]
- Re: Auto-Collect From Payphone [David Tamkin]
- The Phrack Story [Emmanuel Goldstein]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 12:22:28 GMT
- From: Rob Warnock <rpw3%rigden.wpd@sgi.com>
- Subject: Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing?
- Reply-To: Rob Warnock <rpw3@sgi.com>
- Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc., Mountain View, CA
-
-
- In article <7907@accuvax.nwu.edu> optilink!jones@uunet.uu.net (Marvin
- Jones) writes:
-
- | In article <7854@accuvax.nwu.edu>, pjd@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu
- | (Peter J. Dotzauer) writes:
-
- | > Is there a device that can be connected to a telephone or a telephone
- | > line that causes a light bulb to blink, whenever the telephone rings?
-
- | What everyone here in "cubicle-land" does is to purchase a neon panel
- | lamp assembly (as used for AC power "on" indicators on projects) and
- | wire it in parallel with the phone. At normal 48 volts, the lamp is
- | inactive. But the 90 volt ringing is enough to trigger the neon bulb.
-
- Note what he said: "a neon panel lamp ASSEMBLY". That's the kind with
- a built-in limiting resistor. Good.
-
- If any of you kids are going to be trying this at home, do *NOT* use a
- raw NE-52 or equivalent across a phone line without a limiting
- resistor. While it takes about 90v to *start* conducting, the voltage
- instantly drops to 40-60v or less, which could cause it to glow
- forever. (Until you answer the phone. Hmmm... a "call missed"
- light?!?)
-
- Worse, if you're really unlucky and are real close to the CO, the
- current can be high enough to drive some of the smaller neons down
- from the "glow" range into the "arc" range, where the voltage is just
- a few volts. NOT GOOD! Little neons can blow up and spray glass! Or
- less violently, it can just hold your line off-hook forever...
-
- Either buy an already resistor'd assembly like <optilink!jones>
- mentions, or stick in a series resistor. A good value might be
- something high enough to avoid the above ills while being low enough
- to get a good light. Just off the top of my head, try something like
- 22K (1 watt) in each leg (44K total). (The "1 watt" is not because
- you need it in normal operation, but to protect the resistors from
- metallic [transverse] surges, like the bit of lightening that gets
- through the demark arrestor.) That will give you a couple of milliamps
- during ringing, which should be enough.
-
-
- Rob Warnock, MS-9U/510 rpw3@sgi.com rpw3@pei.com
- Silicon Graphics, Inc. (415)335-1673 Protocol Engines, Inc.
- 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd.
- Mountain View, CA 94039-7311
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: From Radio Shack I got a neon test thing. I cut off
- the leads, and tied it across the tip and ring. I have a WE 2515 phone
- (two line/single turn button) phone. The neon bulb sits inside the
- phone next to the clear plastic knob, which in effect illuminates
- everytime a call rings on line one. (Bell on that phone is on line one
- also; I can cut it off. Line two has a side ringer.) PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: rees@dabo.ifs.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
- Subject: Re: Telephone Blinking Instead of Ringing?
- Organization: University of Michigan IFS Project
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 18:42:06 GMT
-
-
- In article <7907@accuvax.nwu.edu>, optilink!jones@uunet.uu.net (Marvin
- Jones) writes:
-
- > What everyone here in "cubicle-land" does is to purchase a neon panel
- > lamp assembly...
-
- Make sure you've got a whole assembly, with the 100k dropping
- resistor. If you just wire a plain neon lamp across the phone line
- you'll short it out.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Neon Ringing Indicators
- Date: 18 May 90 23:54:05 EDT (Fri)
- From: Larry Lippman <kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- In article <7906@accuvax.nwu.edu> OLE@csli.stanford.edu (Ole J.
- Jacobsen) writes:
-
- > A simple and cheap way to add "visual aid" to a telephone is to use a
- > neon-type lamp, like the ones in night-lights. You see these used as
- > message lights in hotel phones. It's not bright but it works if you
- > can see the phone. You can get these frobs at Radio Shack for probably
- > less than a dollar. Simply connect it accross the phone line. The
- > resistance is huge, the current draw extremely low, it's magic.
-
- A word of caution on the above: the neon lamp *must* have a
- current limiting resistance, otherwise the lamp will draw enough
- current to trip the ringing voltage. Many self-contained pilot lamp
- assemblies (i.e., the type with attached insulated wire leads which
- pushes through a panel) have such a current limiting resistor
- built-in. However, a discrete neon lamp, such as an NE-2, NE-51,
- etc., obviously does not. If you are going to use a discrete neon
- lamp in a holder or by soldering to the leads, a typical current
- limiting resistor should be at least 22,000 ohms.
-
-
- Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. "Have you hugged your cat today?"
- UUCP: {boulder|decvax|rutgers|watmath}!acsu.buffalo.edu!kitty!larry
- TEL: 716/688-1231 || FAX: 716/741-9635 {utzoo|uunet}!/ \aerion!larry
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 19:57 CDT
- From: David Tamkin <dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: 900-STOPPER
-
-
- Douglas Scott Reuben wrote in volume 10, issue 357:
-
- | In regard to dialing 1-900-STOPPER to prevent your call from being ID'd,
- | aren't there better (and cheaper!) ways to do this?
-
- Mr. Reuben detailed some ideas, including these:
-
- | [going to another LATA to make the call from there]
-
- That involves the time and expense and annoyance of the trip. The
- long-distance charges may be less than $2 a minute, but unless the
- call is to last a very long time or you started out very close to the
- LATA boundary, saving the difference between $2 a minute and the LD
- charges probably won't justify the time and costs of travel.
-
- | [using a card from a long-distance company who won't pass Caller-ID]
-
- As long as calling card has no startup charge and no monthly or annual
- fee (and either no monthly minimum or a minimum you easily reach),
- that one may work.
-
- | [taking one's mobile phone out of the service area and paying roam rates]
-
- Only *if* one already owns a mobile phone and is already paying the
- monthly charges for maintaining a mobile service account and *if* the
- savings between $2.00 per minute and roam rates cover the daily
- roaming fee and *if* the savings between $2.00 per minute and roam
- rates cover the money and time expenses of traveling outside your
- local cellular coverage area. If you can put the call (where you want
- to mask Caller-ID) off until a day when you were going to be out of
- area and were going to pay a roaming fee anyway, then this will work
- well. Buying a cellular phone and maintaining a cellular service
- account and traveling out of area and paying roam rates just to
- circumvent Caller-ID without going through 1-900-STOPPER might be
- slightly penny-wise but would be extremely pound-foolish.
-
- | [using a marine band radio and calling through the marine operator]
-
- Again, you'd have to want to mask Caller-ID on a heck of a lot of
- calls to buy a marine radio just for that if you don't already own
- one.
-
- | So I'm not sure what all the big deal about 1-900-STOPPER is? Unless
- | I'm missing something obvious, it would seem to me that there are many
- | other alternatives to 900-STOPPER which are either the same price or
- | only marginally more expensive than a direct (regular) call which would
- | show Caller*ID.
-
- Yes, Doug was missing something obvious. He was considering only the
- marginal per-minute cost of each call without the underlying expenses
- of using each method. Except for the calling card, each included
- investments in equipment or additional service accounts or extra time
- and travel. If you already own the marine radio or the cellular phone
- or if you already have a trip planned to another LATA before you want
- to place the call, those can work. For the average person who might
- want to mask Caller-ID for about one ten-minute call every six months
- or so, an atom smasher, with apologies to Augie Doggie and Doggie
- Daddy, is not a more efficient way to crack a walnut.
-
-
- David Tamkin Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 708-518-6769 312-693-0591
- dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: You don't have to even bother roaming. If my
- cellular phone number is captured, a call to IBT Name and Address
- Bureau (312 or 708) 796-9600 produces a response, "Its a mobile
- number. We don't have any other information." (click). That seems to
- be the rule on all cell numbers in this area. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Karl Denninger <karl@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Reply-To: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.mcs.com>
- Organization: MCSNet - Wheeling, IL
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 19:57:28 GMT
-
-
- In article <7781@accuvax.nwu.edu> telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- (Someone-Someplace) writes:
-
- >I feel the need to let them know about the gaping (and I mean gaping)
- >computer and physical security holes they have, but I'm not sure about
- >the best way to approach it (or even if I should). I felt that since
- >you have quite a bit of experience and wisdom, you might be a good
- >person to bounce this off of.
-
- >[Moderator's Note: Well readers, what do *you* suggest? Post your
- >comments here, this person will see them. My suggestion was to simply
- >walk away and ignore it. The company would have to prove who was
- >responsible for any vandalism or hacking, etc. PT]
-
- I would agree.
-
- If you concerned about them possibly having a problem, publish
- anything you can that isn't proprietary. That ought to really get
- them motivated to fix the problems. As long as you don't breach any
- confidences or proprietary information, you can't be prosecuted or
- sued for doing it.
-
- If you "report" it privately, not only are you then flagged as a
- potential break-in suspect, but the number of said suspects is
- artificially limited. The company will be strongly motivated to do
- NOTHING, increasing the possibility that there will be trouble, and
- you will get to defend yourself from said trouble.
-
- If you tell them about the trouble, and tell them that 24 hours from
- your notification you're going to make the public parts known (say,
- through another posting to this forum :-) then they will be >strongly<
- motivated to plug the holes immediately.
-
- Your only other real alternative is to ignore it.
-
- Do you like this former employer?
-
- I would >not< report it privately and keep it under wraps. To do so,
- especially given the magnitude of the problems, is inviting a visit
- from the Gendarme sometime in the future.
-
-
- Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
- Public Access Data Line: [+1 708 808-7300], Voice: [+1 708 808-7200]
- Macro Computer Solutions, Inc. "Quality Solutions at a Fair Price"
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Sanjay Hiranandani <consp10@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu>
- Subject: Re: Use of US Phone in India
- Date: 18 May 90 12:55:35 GMT
- Reply-To: <consp10@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu.cc.binghamton.edu>
- Organization: SUNY-Binghamton Computer Center
-
-
- In article <7912@accuvax.nwu.edu> mailrus!uflorida!rm1!bapat@
- uunet.uu.net (Subodh Bapat) writes:
-
- >> Does India use the same pulse/tones that we do?
-
- >Pulse yes, tone no.
-
- Not entirely true ... A few of the bigger cities are now gradually
- moving over to tones, from pulse. In fact my parents' home.. (in
- Bombay) has tone dialing phones; also there's all the fancy things
- like call-waiting, call forwarding, conference calling.. etc.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 11:51:32 PDT
- From: Wally Kramer <wallyk@tekfdi.fdi.tek.com>
- Subject: Re: Interesting DMS Trick
- Organization: Microwave & RF Instruments, Tektronix, Beaverton, Oregon
-
-
- In article <7842@accuvax.nwu.edu> douglass@ddsw1.mcs.com (Douglas Mason)
- [Volume 10, Issue 355, Message 10 of 12] writes:
-
- [description of back-to-back holding of call waiting resulting in
- an unintended three-way conversation when done within in an exchange]
-
- > Can anyone explain this occurance?
-
- Sounds like faulty software (or product evaluation, design,
- engineering or maybe the engineer -- naaawwww must be the equipment on
- the customer's premises :-)).
-
- Look at it this way: the odds are against making this stuff work. The
- number of ways for it to work right are countable (like maybe a few
- dozen) but the number of ways for it to work wrong (or not at all) are
- uncountable (like billions and billions). However, given enough
- monkey engineers and enough time you could replace AT&T.
-
- Of course, the job of a real engineer is to overcome those odds.
-
-
- wallyk@tekfdi.fdi.tek.com (Wally Kramer) 503 627 2363
- (Software Engineer) Contractor from Step Technology, Inc. 503 244 1239
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 19:10 CDT
- From: David Tamkin <dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: Auto-Collect From Payphone
-
-
- Mark Lowe wrote in volume 10, issue 351:
-
- | The connection is then made ... and the lady who answers must have
- | thought it was a joke! The voice said "You are receiving a collect
- | call. To accept, enter 1; to refuse, enter 0 and hang up."
-
- We don't know whether it was supposed to say, "a collect call from
- Mark Lowe," instead of simply "a collect call;" whether that
- information was supposed to come after the menu (poor planning if it
- was) but never arrived; whether it was on its way but there was so
- long a pause that the recipient figured she'd never hear who was
- calling; or whether one of those choices was actually to find out who
- it was and then make a decision (probably 1 to listen for the name
- before deciding and 0 to refuse outright), but it was very badly
- worded. Whatever, it came out sounding like a choice of accepting or
- refusing unconditionally, so of course the receptionist turned the
- call down.
-
- | The next thing I heard was a female synthetic voice repeating OVER AND
- | OVER "Hang up and try your call again."
-
- Caught in a loop, huh?
-
- | Needless to say, I decided to wait until I got to a REAL phone. Talk
- | about taking AOS just a STEP too far!!
-
- Can't blame you for that. With that system the AOS gets no collect
- calls completed, so you know what it probably does? It bills the
- recipient for a one-minute collect call from the splashing point
- anyway.
-
-
- David Tamkin Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 708-518-6769 312-693-0591
- dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 15 May 90 02:38:06 pdt
- From: Emmanuel Goldstein <emmanuel@well.uucp>
- Subject: The Phrack Story
-
-
- Greetings!
-
- What follows is an advance copy of two articles appearing in the new
- issue of 2600 Magazine. Our spring issue is being released on Friday.
- You have our permission to distribute this any time after then if you
- so desire. The articles have to do with the whole
- Phrack/LOD/E911/Steve Jackson/jolnet sordid affair. We think your
- readers might find it interesting, whether or not they actually agree
- with it.
-
- We hope you'll be able to put this into one of your special issues.
- In any event, keep up the good work!
-
-
- Emmanuel
-
- ==================================================
-
- The above is a letter I received a few days ago. Attached to it were
- the articles mentioned, to which I alluded in the Digest a couple days
- ago. Although the length prohibits transmission as a regular (or
- special issue) Digest, it can be handled with ease by ftp.
-
- To help with distribution, for one week from today, I will forward the
- file to anyone writing to 'telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu'. Do not mix
- up messages to the Digest with requests for this file. Do not add
- personal comments you want me to answer. Just write a single line
- asking for the 2600 articles, and **include an address*. I CANNOT IN
- ALL CASES RELY ON THE 'FROM' WITH YOUR LETTER.
-
- You will get the usual autoreply saying I got your message ... and you
- will get the above file ASAP. Obviously, if you can ftp it yourself I
- would much prefer that you do so ... or use the 'bitftp@pucc.bitnet'
- server if possible.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #364
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa19021;
- 19 May 90 5:32 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa30129;
- 19 May 90 3:39 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab01748;
- 19 May 90 2:34 CDT
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 1:31:48 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #365
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005190131.ab29586@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sat, 19 May 90 01:31:32 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 365
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Interstate Access Charge [Christopher Ambler]
- Re: I Have No Default Long Distance Carrier [David Tamkin]
- The Mis-Named FCC-Mandated Charge [Will Martin]
- Re: Line Slip [Ken Abrams]
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [John Parsons]
- Re: AT&T NAVSTAR/GPS News Excerpts [Roy Smith]
- Re: Problems with NXX-0000 Type Numbers [David Tamkin]
- Drug Dealers and Caller ID [John Bruner]
- Pulse Speed (was Re: Alternative to Touch Tone) [David Lewis]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: cambler@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Fubar)
- Subject: Intrastate Access Charge
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 1:28:29 GMT
- Reply-To: cambler@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Fubar)
- Organization: Fantasy, Incorported: Reality None of Our Business.
-
-
- I recently ordered another line for my BBS. I had been waiting for
- this line to become available (54-FUBAR :-)), and it finally did, so I
- called.
-
- I talked to the service woman, and told her that I would like a third
- service to my apartment, measured rate, no touchtone, no inside wire
- maintenance, and that the line is already in existance, as when I got
- my second service, the nice lineman put in 4 lines and my own network
- interface box for my apartment. She took down all the information and
- told me:
-
- Service (mearured rate) : $5.15
- Custom Number : $1.50
-
- Total Per Month : $6.65
-
- Plus a $10 charge for the custom number at startup.
-
- Ok, no big deal, and I said ok, do it. She assured me that that's all
- that would be on my bill.
-
- So I get my confirmation in the mail, and there's also this $3.50 per
- month "interstate access" charge. I specifically got a measured rate
- line because I'm not making any calls on it. It's incoming only. So
- what is it? What can I do?
-
-
- ++Christopher(); --- cambler@polyslo.calpoly.edu --- chris@fubarsys.slo.ca.us
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Is this a new record for this question being asked?
- It was covered in issues 359 and 361 earlier this week. Okay, for
- people still unclear on the concept, the answer is you cannot avoid
- it. You must pay it. I am not going to impose on Mr. Covert to respond
- once again, for the second time this week. The two messages which
- follow will answer in more detail. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Tamkin <dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: I Have No Default Long Distance Carrier
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 20:00:40 CDT
-
-
- In volume 10, issue 355, Alex Pournelle responds to Brian Litzinger's
- previous avowal that he has no default inter-exchange carrier:
-
- | Umm, do they still charge you for that "optional" "non-basic" long-
- | distance tariff? Now, is it just me, or would this kind of billing
- | throw lawsuits around the magistrate's corner office in any other field?
- | Yeah, the basic rate is $9.00 or whatever per month -- but you can't have
- | it without the ($3 and climbing) long-distance add-on!
-
- This has been discussed at length before. Brian can still receive
- long-distance calls and still place them with 10XXX, so he still gets
- something for paying the subscriber line charge.
-
- | Or am I wrong -- and there is a way, with enough patience and coaching
- | of the P*bell 811-SUCKERS, to order up a "local only" line?
-
- On this desired local-only line, is 10XXX also disabled and are
- incoming inter-LATA calls refused for you at your switch? I'm sure no
- such thing is tariffed, and if it were, the cost of having 10XXX and
- incoming LD calls blocked would run you a higher per-month fee than
- the subscriber line charge -- that is, if you would even then be able
- to get out of paying the subscriber line charge.
-
-
- David Tamkin Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 708-518-6769 312-693-0591
- dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 12:31:18 CDT
- From: Will Martin <wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil>
- Subject: The Mis-Named FCC-Mandated Charge
-
-
- Reference recent postings on the nature of the surcharge and how it
- cannot be avoided by not having a default LD carrier, etc.:
-
- On my SW Bell bill, this is referred to as "Federal End User Common
- Line Charge". It is $3.50. I have ordinary rotary-dial flat-rate
- (unmeasured) service in St. Louis City. [SW Bell doesn't seem to know
- that "end-user" should be hyphenated... :-)]
-
- I note people on the list stating that they pay $3.00 even. First off,
- if this is an FCC-mandated surcharge, and thus national in scope, why
- is it higher here than elsewhere? What is the justification for it
- varying from region to region? Should it not be identical nationwide?
-
- Secondly, this charge has risen over its life. I seem to recall it
- started out at $1.50, though that may have been $2.00. I can
- understand the motivation behind the charge, to replace the revenue
- lost from kickbacks from LD service (I may not *like* it, but I can
- *understand* it... Grrrr... :-), but what possible excuse can there be
- for it having *risen*? The kickback-revenue was lost when the breakup
- and deregulation occurred, and the charge was instituted then. Over
- the ensuing years, it should have decreased, so as to be phased out,
- not increased. Who paid off who to get *this* gravy train?
-
- Is the income from this surcharge treated differently, for accounting
- purposes, than the income from the "real" charges for telephone
- service by the BOCs/telcos? Or does it all just get dumped into the
- same pot? (I have this image of the cellar of the new SW Bell
- building here looking like Scrooge McDuck's money vault... :-)
-
- Lastly, is there any official plan for this charge to *ever* go away?
- Or will we have it for eternity? I would have thought that there would
- have been some intent, in the breakup/deregulation mess, to eventually
- have these industries support themselves, without such artificial rate
- adjustments as this surcharge. Isn't that what "deregulation" implies?
-
- I would have thought that part of the breakup order would be to tell
- the BOCs/telcos that "to cushion the shock of losing the subsidy from
- the LD carrier(s), you will get this special income for <n> years, to
- give you that much time to plan and institute rate restructuring and
- internal economies so as to live within the income from your
- customers' payments alone," or words to that effect. The actual
- situation seems to be just the reverse -- the BOCs get a
- constantly-increasing subsidy gouged out of the ratepayers under the
- guise of the FCC mandate. Is there any economic plan or design behind
- this scheme to produce some particular result (other than to give the
- BOC management thicker marble around their swimming pools, that is)?
-
-
- Regards, Will
- wmartin@st-louis-emh2.army.mil OR wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Ken Abrams <kabra437@pallas.athenanet.com>
- Subject: Re: Line Slip
- Date: 18 May 90 20:12:42 GMT
- Reply-To: Ken Abrams <pallas!kabra437@uunet.uu.net>
- Organization: Athenanet, Inc., Springfield, Illinois
-
-
- In article <7574@accuvax.nwu.edu> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
-
- > The same behaviour is observed on both
- >lines at the calling end and all 6 lines at the recieving end. Two
- >computers and four brands ov terminals are involved. Before bitching
- >to the phone company, what else should I try?
-
- That's a good start but you still haven't determined which end is the
- likely culprit. Alas, unless you are paying for "data" lines, that
- task still falls on you as the end user. Try calling in from some
- different locations; if the problem persists, then it is probably on
- the "host" end.
-
- A couple of thoughts come to mind. Is the computer or serial port
- cabling at either end near other power lines or florescent lights
- (including conduit runs and extension cords)? I have seen induction
- put noise into a serial cable and this usually affects all speeds of
- transmission.
-
- To repeat an earlier suggestion: After you determine which end is
- causing the problem (and assuming it is chronic and repeatable) AND
- you have eliminated the station equipment as a possible cause, then by
- all means, report noise on the line(s) to Ma Bell. These problems
- eventually get resolved but some take a LONG time and the ultimate fix
- in not always in the Telco equipment.
-
- Now for what I consider the ultimate in nasty "line noise" problems:
- From home, I call a Unix box with a USR 14.4 at both ends. When in
- the shell on the Unix box I NEVER have anything appear on the screen
- that looks like line noise (as it should be since the USRs are running
- in error correcting mode). The hooker is that I DO see things that
- look like line noise when I run the BBS program on the Unix machine.
- Now we can add a new posibility the the list of things that cause
- "line noise"; software!!!!!! ;-).
-
-
- Ken Abrams uunet!pallas!kabra437
- Illinois Bell kabra437@athenanet.com
- Springfield (voice) 217-753-7965
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 13:45:33 mdt
- From: John Parsons <johnp@hpgrla.gr.hp.com>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
-
-
- My original post:
-
- > We're building a house and it's almost time to wire it, so I thought
- > I'd fish for a little free advice...
-
- Egad! I'm awash in free advice! Netfolk are so generous, I love it.
- Wish I could respond to all the email, but I'm a novice emailer.
-
- Anyway, the consensus is that as far as inside wiring goes, there's no
- such thing as overkill. I was afraid of that ;-) So I'm selling some
- "doggie" mutual fund shares and investing in commodities -- copper and
- conduit!
-
- Again, thanks for all the advice and clever tips.
-
-
- John Parsons johnp@hpgrla.gr.hp.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
- Subject: Re: AT&T NAVSTAR/GPS News Excerpts
- Organization: Public Health Research Institute, New York City
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 19:06:46 GMT
-
-
- > But the DoD has decided that even the C/A signal is too accurate to be
- > generally available, so it has begun a practice it calls "selective
- > availability." That delicious piece of bureaucratese means that the
- > DoD will introduce random noise on the C/A signal, known in some
- > circles as "dithering," to make it dificult or even impossible to use.
-
- If I understand things properly (somebody please correct me if
- I'm wrong), the C/A signal has *always* had the noise added to it;
- that's what makes it less accurate than the encrypted signal. This
- has lead to a technique known as "differential GPS" which was, I
- believe, developed by the Coast Guard.
-
- Let's say you have a ship that needs to know its position very
- accurately (for example, a buoy tender trying to place a navigational
- aide exactly where the charts indicate it should be). It has a GPS
- rcvr on board, but can only get the fuzzed-up signal. Let's also say
- you have a fixed land station which knows its position quite well.
- The land station receives the fuzzed GPS signal, takes where GPS says
- it is, subtracts that from where it knows it is, and computes the
- instantaneous GPS error. It then transmits that error to the offshore
- ship, which adds it to where its GPS box says it is to get where it
- really is. I believe the USCG has been using this technique, or at
- least is experimenting with it. The technique depends on the
- positional error due to the added noise being the same everywhere, or
- at least over a given area of some size.
-
-
- Roy Smith, Public Health
- Research Institute 455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016
- roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu -OR- {att,cmcl2,rutgers,hombre}!phri!roy
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 19:55 CDT
- From: David Tamkin <dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: Problems with NXX-0000 Type Numbers
-
-
- Glynne Tolar wrote in volume 10, issue 354:
-
- | Speaking of easy phone numbers, just exactly how do you get them? When
- | I called my phone company they told me I had to take whatever came
- | across the computer. If I did not like it she could ask for another
- | number. Are you supposed to make the service rep sit there for an hour
- | or more looking for the number you would like? What do businesses do?
- | My guess is the phone company has a different policy for business
- | customers.
-
- They probably charge businesses for assigning a special telephone
- number, even if it's in the appropriate local CO.
-
- | What does your phone company do?
-
- Patrick Townson answered:
-
- : Moderator's Note: Illinois Bell takes suggestions, and will fill them
- : except under certain circumstances.
-
- My own experiences with residential lines in Chicago with both
- Illinois Bell and Centel are that the service representative, *if* you
- bring up the matter of wanting to select the number, will offer a list
- of the next four or five numbers coming to the top of the list. You
- may select one of them or let them assign you the topmost.
-
-
- David Tamkin Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 708-518-6769 312-693-0591
- dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: I do my own 'homework' and find out what desirable
- numbers are idle. I make the list of ten or so numbers, then call the
- Business Office. I ask, "Can I have such and such?". The rep checks
- and almost every time says okay. And there is no special ongoing
- monthly fee for the number, either. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 08:55:49 CDT
- From: John Bruner <bruner@uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Drug Dealers and Caller ID
-
-
- There was a submission in the RISKS digest (volume 9, number 22) that
- had been forwarded from ClariNet, which quoted a UPI news story about
- Baltimore drug dealers and Caller ID. The conditions under which it
- appeared in RISKS prevent me from quoting it here; however, I suggest
- that anyone who is interested in this topic take a look at it.
-
- The gist of the story is that drug dealers are using Caller ID to
- screen out calls from unfamiliar numbers. If the call doesn't come
- from a recognized prefix (or from a recognized payphone number) the
- dealer is suspicious, and he may not even answer the call.
-
-
- John Bruner Center for Supercomputing R&D, University of Illinois
- bruner@uicsrd.csrd.uiuc.edu (217) 244-4476
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lewis <nvuxr!deej@bellcore.bellcore.com>
- Subject: Pulse Speed (was Re: Alternative to Touch Tone)
- Date: 18 May 90 18:05:49 GMT
- Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ
-
-
- [various articles about using "fast dial pulse" with autodialing modems
- etc. as an alternative to DTMF deleted for brevity's sake...]
-
- I dug out the Authoritative Reference, the LATA Switching System
- Generic Requirements (LSSGR). In particular, LSSGR Section 6,
- Signaling.
-
- According to the LSSGR, switching systems for BOC use should have the
- capability of detecting pulses at a speed of 7.5 to 12 pulses per
- second, and a percent break of 58 to 64 percent.
-
- Further, an off-hook interval of as little as 300 ms should be
- recognized as an interdigital time.
-
- Thus, the "fastest" you can dial a single DP digit is 83 ms for each
- integer value of the digit, minus 35 ms: 12 pps => 83 ms/pulse; 58%
- break => 48 ms break + 35 ms off-hook.
-
- The "fastest" you can dial using DP is therefore (300 ms + 83 ms *
- digit integer value - 35 ms) per digit (348 ms to DP a '1', 1095 ms to
- DP a '0') minus 300 ms (no interdigit timing after the final digit).
-
- Also according to the LSSGR, the switching systems should recognize
- DTMF digit and interdigit periods as short as 40 ms, and may accept
- digit and interdigit periods as short as 23 ms. Therefore, the
- "fastest" you can reliably dial DTMF is 80 ms per digit, except for
- the final digit which is 40 ms.
-
- Note: numbers extracted from TR-TSY-000506, Switching: LSSGR Section
- 6, Issue 2, July 1987 (A module of TR-TSY-000064, LATA Switching
- System Generic Requirements). TR-TSY-000506 is Copyright C. 1980,
- 1985, 1986, 1987 Bell Communications Research Inc.
-
- It's also a handy document to have around.
-
-
- David G Lewis ...!bellcore!nvuxr!deej
- (@ Bellcore Navesink Research & Engineering Center)
- "If this is paradise, I wish I had a lawnmower."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #365
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa18702;
- 19 May 90 17:23 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa01663;
- 19 May 90 15:46 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa19941;
- 19 May 90 14:41 CDT
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 14:24:56 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #366
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005191424.ab06284@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sat, 19 May 90 14:24:39 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 366
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Special Issue: RISKS Commentaries [TELECOM Moderator]
- NRI's Knowbot; Privacy [Computerworld, via Fred E.J. Linton]
- Cellular Phone Billing Oddities [Douglas Mason]
- Forced Unlisting [John Higdon]
- Distributed TELCO [Joe Stong]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [John Higdon]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [John R. Levine]
- Re: Auto-Collect From a Payphone [MCL9337@tamvenus.bitnet]
- Re: Phone Conferences [William Degnan]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 13:37:42 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Special Issue: RISKS Commentaries
-
-
- Recently a number of articles appeared in RISKS relating to telephone
- security and related problems. Will Martin forwarded this with the
- suggestion that comp.dcom.telecom/TELECOM Digest readers might be
- interested in seeing them. I assume many of you already read RISKS,
- but since some of you may not see it or receive it at your site, a
- special issue of the Digest being distributed Saturday afternoon will
- include many of these items.
-
- Included will be a piece from someone alleging mis-use of Caller ID by
- a Police Department. This piece was sent to me by someone else, and I
- turned it down for the reason that such an item here would only cause
- a major backlog of replies and comments on the subject that I am
- ill-equipped to deal with and most of you are bored from reading.
-
- So these articles -- and in particular the 'mis-use of Caller ID' item
- which will be sent to you should have responses directed to RISKS --
- if in fact you wish to respond at all. I am passing these along only
- as a courtesy to those who have not seen them; not because I need more
- replies here than I am already receiving.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 19-MAY-1990 04:54:38.83
- From: "Fred E.J. Linton" <FLINTON@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Subject: NRI's Knowbot; Privacy
-
-
- A couple of articles from "COMPUTERWORLD" of May 14 may interest TELECOMers.
-
- Page 66 describes a "Knowbot Information Service" (KIS) being developed by
- NRI to facilitate e-mail address lookup for Internet users: quoting briefly,
- "A KIS user enters the last name of the person sought. A Knowbot searches
- each of the major Internet directories, then returns the full names of all
- users with that last name [and their] source, E-mail address, telephone ... .
- KIS searches ... Network Information Center at SRI ... MCI ... and more ... "
-
- On page 127 it is stated: "Already this year, New York and Maryland
- have passed laws that prevent merchants from forcing consumers to
- write telephone numbers and addresses on credit-card slips."
-
- I'd welcome more detail on either of these items than "COMPUTERWORLD" provides.
-
-
- Fred <FLINTON@eagle.Wesleyan.EDU> <fejlinton@{ mcimail.com | attmail }>
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Douglas Mason <douglas@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Cellular Phone Billing Oddities
- Reply-To: douglas@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Douglas Mason)
- Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Wheeling, IL
- Date: Thu, 17 May 90 19:14:40 GMT
-
-
- Kick in a little imagination:
-
- Currently, in Kalamazoo Michigan I have Century Cellunet as my
- cellular provider. My rates are $7.50/month and $.35 and $.15 for
- peak and off-peak, respectively.
-
- Now I imagine that many of you would be happy at that, but here comes
- the interesting part.
-
- I am moving to Grand Rapids, which is about forty miles to the north.
- Close enough that it is almost a local call there from here in
- Kalamazoo. But, there is a different Century Cellunet office there.
- The rates there are $7.50/month and $.45/minute regardless of
- peak/off-peak.
-
- Since I have to move and have two cellular phones with service,
- suddenly I see myself re-evaluating the importance of having both
- phones! I call up my local Century Cellunet office (who have been
- good to me) and ask them if what I hear is correct. Here is the story
- they tell me:
-
- All Century Cellunet offices in Michigan are allowed to set their own
- rates based on what the competition is. Since Cellular One across
- town has their rates at $7.50 and .35/.15, that is what they set
- theirs at.
-
- Grand Rapids, even as close as it is, does not have that competition,
- so they have the higher rates.
-
- I asked him if there was anything I could do to keep the lower rates.
- Grand Rapids even wanted me to pay $35 to change over to their more
- expensive plan.
-
- He said that if I kept my Kalamazoo service, I could be up there, make
- all the calls I want and be charged my regular .35/.15 AND I wouldn't
- ever get any roaming fees or anything like that. The only catch is
- that if someone wanted to call me they would have to either call my
- Kalamazoo cellular number or call the Grand Rapids roam number. There
- are no additional or strange charges for someone calling my Kalamazoo
- number and having it ring in Grand Rapids. I am billed airtime only.
-
- I think having people call a Kalamazoo number is a small price to pay
- for keeping such low rates! I don't get many incoming calls anyways,
- and if it is important, a call to Kalamazoo is not too big of a
- problem.
-
- Strange marketing schemes!
-
-
- Douglas T. Mason | douglas@ddsw1.UUCP or dtmason@m-net |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Forced Unlisting
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com>
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Date: 19 May 90 05:38:29 PDT (Sat)
- From: John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com>
-
-
- In my quest for account security with Pac*Bell, it appears that I have
- shot myself in the foot. For years, I have had consolidated billing at
- my residence, enabling the receipt of only two bills each month for
- ten lines. There were two groups: measured and unmeasured. One of my
- unmeasured lines was listed and was also the billing number for its
- group.
-
- Then I got a brilliant idea. Why not make the billing number one of
- the unlisted lines so that if anyone tried to impersonate me at the
- business office, they would be unable to find the account because
- there would be no account info under the listed number. After a
- considerable amount of "supervisor intervention", this is exactly what
- they did. "That'll show any sneaky SOBs they can't fool with my
- account", I thought.
-
- Then yesterday, a highly-placed employee of Pac*Bell, one who keeps me
- well informed about matters that transpire within the hallowed halls
- of the utility, called with some info. "By the way", he said, "I had
- to really scrounge to find your number since it's not listed with DA."
-
- "Oh, sure it is", I replied. When we hung up, I called DA and sure
- enough, no "John Higdon" listed in San Jose. What? I've been listed in
- the directory since high school, and I won't even tell you when that
- was. A call to the business office revealed the problem. It seems that
- while you can "unlist" numbers behind a listed pilot number, you can't
- list numbers behind an unlisted pilot number. So there it is, folks.
- Give up security, or give up a listing in the phone book.
-
- Well, since I am actually in the book until next March (I made my
- changes after the cutoff for the last directory), there is time to
- consider my course of action very carefully.
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@zygot.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 04:01:29 -0700
- From: Joe Stong <jst@cca.ucsf.edu>
- Subject: Distributed TELCO
-
-
- Copyright 1990, Joseph Stong. You must give these ideas away freely.
- Used here with permission of the author.
-
- Imagine a small box on the rooftop of your house. The box has four
- "eyeballs" pointed towards four of your neighbors, to the north, south,
- east, and west. The box has a small power cable, and a couple of
- pieces of coax leading into the house. Inside the house are slightly
- fat phone jacks, that connect into both pieces of coax. Another
- device that looks like an unusually fat phone jack has a thinwire
- Ethernet connector on it. Each of your neighbors has a similar
- arrangement.
-
- You buy the box at a store. You plug ordinary telephones into the
- jacks. Upon picking up a telephone for the first time after connecting
- up the system, the phone says, your telephone number is 412346,234457
- please enter the names for your directory listing. You key the name
- that will list you in the electronic directory.
-
- This is an oversimplified idealization, for the purpose of getting
- folks to visualize how a such a system would work. The "transducers"
- on the four sides of the eyeball box could be microwave transmitter
- receiver pairs, or infrared LED/photodiode pairs to go to a piece of
- fiber that you throw over the fence to your neighbor's house.
-
- Your box would cooperatively switch the datastream from other
- conversations on to their eventual destination. Your box would
- participate in the systemwide directory keeping. Your box, upon
- coming on line, would determine which sites it was between, to
- determine your pseudo-latitude-longitude "telephone number".
-
- There might be 16 sq cm of mass produced silicon VLSI in the box
- itself, which might cost $400. The phones would be ordinary
- telephones. You might be able to have 32 phone lines and an ethernet,
- before having to buy another box. Between boxes, the data rate would
- be 100Mbaud. The two coax line downlink into the house would be about
- 11Mbaud, with the $30 "phone jacks" being little more than shift
- registers and D-A and A-D converters to pick off signals from the
- synchronous coax lines.
-
- What does it achieve? The elimination of a local TELCO. The
- elimination of a tree structure of wiring, replacing it with a large
- redundant grid. The elimination of local phone bills. Indeed, many
- "eyeballs" at the edge of town might end up being pointed at a
- long-distance carrier system, though some would go to longer pieces of
- repeatered fiber to rural subscribers.
-
- The system is cooperative, and self maintaining. The software on the
- silicon in the eyeball box itsself would be designed to be function
- without any centralized "management", doing location determination and
- routing by itsself, like UseNet or Internet without the
- administrators.
-
- This is an assemblage of ideas from other folks. I've added and
- embellished, but I didn't come up with the original concept.
-
- I'd love to hear about how this system could be made to work. If you
- post, please copy it to me in mail, as I have trouble keeping up with
- the volume in mod.telecom.
-
-
- Joe Stong jst@cca.ucsf.edu
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: But replies to Mr. Stong in the mail should also be
- copied to telecom. Thanks. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 19 May 90 01:24:38 PDT (Sat)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Dave Mc Mahan <claris!netcom!mcmahan@ames.arc.nasa.gov> writes:
-
- > It's not Sprint or MCI, it's the Telebit. From my understanding,
- > Telebit modems don't work worth squat when the signal is digitized.
- > Seems that the digitizing screws up the phasing of the modem signal
- > (why? I don't know) and AT&T uses analog all along the signal path.
-
- Sorry, completely untrue. AT&T has very few analog paths left in its
- network. Most calls today travel on digital paths, even short distance
- local. Virtually all Bay Area calls between COs travel on digital
- carrier. If Telebit modems didn't work on digitized audio, the whole
- UUCP network couldn't exist.
-
- There isn't one of my fifteen UUCP neighbors that isn't reached
- through a digital connection. In addition, two of them have DID
- numbers for their Telebits that are on the station side of a digital
- PBX. Connections to my southern California neighbors are carried by
- AT&T who uses PacNet, Pacific Bell's statewide fiber optic network.
-
- > Just a side effect of the 'all fiber' types of network installations
- > that Sprint brags about. I found out about this from an ex-roommate
- > of mine that is a modem design engineer at Telebit.
-
- Sorry, again, but "digital" is not the problem, regardless of what
- your ex-roommate may have thought. What IS causing the problem is
- Sprint; probably the new echo suppressors and adaptive equalizers. If
- Telebits couldn't work over digital circuits, they would be useless
- indeed. But as I pointed out above, my three Telebits talk over
- nothing but digital circuits, with a typical throughput of 850 to 900
- cps.
-
- > If there is interest, e-mail me and I'll ask him for a
- > more detailed description of the problem causes and what Telebit plans
- > on doing about it (if anything).
-
- I think we'd all like to hear about this, considering that Telebits
- work on *most* digital circuits just fine.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Organization: Segue Software, Cambridge MA
- Date: 19 May 90 10:53:06 EDT (Sat)
- From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us>
-
-
- In article <7955@accuvax.nwu.edu> you write:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 363, Message 5 of 9
-
- >In article <7918@accuvax.nwu.edu> johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us
- >(John R. Levine) writes:
-
- >>[my Telebit throughput via Sprint recently became terrible, MCI's just as
- >bad, AT&T is somewhat better]
-
- >It's not Sprint or MCI, it's the Telebit. From my understanding,
- >Telebit modems don't work worth squat when the signal is digitized.
- >... AT&T uses analog all along the signal path
-
- That can't possibly be it. For one thing, Sprint provided perfectly
- fine Telebit performance until a few weeks ago. For another, AT&T
- digitizes signals all over the place, indeed they invented most of the
- digital transmission technology.
-
- In the meantime, I received a message suggesting that Sprint's new
- echo suppressors are probably more CCITT compliant than the old ones,
- and there may be an incompatibility with the PEP protocol. But what's
- really amazing is that my Telebit throughput has suddenly recovered.
- Now I routinely get well over 1000 cps coast to coast, better than
- ever before. Perhaps our pals at Sprint read the digest and, to their
- credit, respond to customer needs. (Take that, AT&T lovers.)
-
-
- Regards,
- John Levine, johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us, {spdcc|ima|lotus}!esegue!johnl
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 06:09 CDT
- From: MCL9337@tamvenus.bitnet
- Subject: Re: Auto-Collect From a Payphone
-
-
- In my original post, I left out the fact that the phone DID play back
- my recorded name statement. One of the problems with the entire idea
- of the automation is that the calling party's name is all that can be
- given. Of course, one COULD say "John Doe calling for Jim Doe," I
- guess.
-
- Who can say? I wouldn't be surprised if the called party DID get
- billed for a one-minute collect call from the AOS! They have to make
- their money SOMEHOW!
-
-
- Mark C. Lowe - KB5III
-
- MCL9337@TAMVENUS.BITNET
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 15:14:15 CDT
- From: William Degnan <WDegnan@f39.n382.z1.fidonet.org>
- Subject: Re: Phone Conferences
-
-
- In a message of <May 15 20:36> Kevin Ashford (maverick@pnet01.cts.com)
- writes:
-
- >I would like to put together a list of 'phone conferences' or 'talk'
-
- You might see if you can find "The Incredible Dial-A-Message
- Directory" C 1985, by Mark C. Guncheon, Published by Contemporary
- Books, Inc, Chicago. LC 85-7767. ISBN 0-8092-5338-0
-
- Or in Canada, contact Beaverbooks, Ltd, Markham, Ont.
-
- Well, sure it is a little out of date, but it might give you some
- ideas. There might be a newer version ... or you might compile a newer
- version.
-
- Here's one for the collection: Dial-the-Atheist 512 458-5731.
-
-
- Disclaimer: Contents do not constitute "advice" unless we are on the clock.
- William Degnan | wdegnan@mcimail.com
- Communications Network Solutions | !wdegnan@at&tmail.com
- -Independent Consultants | William.Degnan@telemail.com
- in Telecommunications | UUCP: ...!natinst!tqc!39!WDegnan
- P.O. Drawer 9530 | ARPA: WDegnan@f39.n382.z1.FidoNet.Org
- Austin, TX 78766-9530 | Voice +1 512 323 9383
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #366
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa21485;
- 19 May 90 18:27 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa29935;
- 19 May 90 16:50 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab01663;
- 19 May 90 15:46 CDT
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 15:03:31 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest Special: RISKS Commentaries
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005191503.ab24192@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sat, 19 May 90 15:00:00 CDT Special: RISKS Commentaries
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Telecom-Related Postings From RISKS [Will Martin]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 10:55:00 CDT
- From: Will Martin <wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil>
- Subject: Telecom-Related Postings From RISKS
-
-
- Patrick, The following items are all phone-related postings from the
- past three issues (89-91) of the RISKS Digest; I thought you might
- want to include them in a regular or special issue of TELECOM Digest,
- since I don't recall seeing the exact same items there:
-
- ********
-
- Date: Wed, 2 May 90 12:17:44 MDT
- From: glb%beta@LANL.GOV (Gail L Barlich)
- Subject: Phone System Problems
-
- I began my undergraduate education at a church-related college in
- Texas. To handle long distance calls from dorm phones the phone
- company issued everyone "student billing cards." The phone company
- waved the deposit because of the reputation (?) of the school.
-
- Then I transferred and again decided to live in the dorm. I contacted
- the phone company and explained how I had a "student" card in Texas.
- They had a similar deal but required that a heftly deposit remain on
- account. I explained that I had a card in Texas with no deposit. The
- woman suggested that I write a letter about my previous account and
- include my card number if possible. A few weeks later I was issued a
- "student" card without a deposit because the "the computer" showed
- that my Texas card was actually a "normal" billing card and I had a
- good payment history. They could not issue a "normal" card for a dorm
- resident.
-
- Each new school year I would call the phone company and confirm that
- my card was still active. Each year I had the same card number.
-
- Well, my last year I got lazy. I just began using it like usual and
- never got a complaint from an operator. I was making calls during the
- day related to job hunting, so I expected horrible bills. The months
- went by, but no bills came. I called the phone company in December.
- Somehow I had visions of the university holding my diploma if I had
- outstanding bills. The phone person insisted that my account showed
- zero. Then I talked to the supervisor, and he also stated that my
- account was entirely paid with no phone calls on record for my card or
- my dorm phone number. I told him exactly where I had been calling and
- the charges I expected. One week later a programmer called and
- congratulated me on beating the phone system. Apparently my "student"
- card had some kind of odd designator on the number that merged it into
- the "normal" card database. The phone company had actually terminated
- the "student" card program many months before. My number had survived
- but with no connections into billing. The employee informed me that
- my card had been terminated in good standing.
-
- So I got out into the real world and called to get a telephone hooked
- up. I carefully gave them both "student" numbers. They told me that
- no deposit would be required because of my excellent payment
- history...
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 02 May 90 14:40:19 EDT
- From: smb@ulysses.att.com
- Subject: Phone System Problems
-
-
- I don't know if these two stories shed any light on the problems, but
- they're illustrative of system-level failures.
-
- When I lived in Durham, NC, during the early 1970s, the local phone
- system (GTE) did not have Automatic Number Identification (ANI) on
- long-distance calls. As a result, whenever you placed such a call
- (and you could direct-dial), an operator would come online and ask
- what number you were calling from. The possibilities for error and
- fraud are, of course, obvious, and it was always a subject of much
- discussion what checking was done. Did they at least have information
- on your exchange? Could they tell if the alleged calling line was
- actually busy? And most important, what happened to misattributed
- calls? One prevalent local rumor had it that such calls, when
- challenged, were randomly assigned to other phone lines, in proportion
- to the number of actual calls. That theory always seemed improbable,
- but...
-
- One day, we receive a bill showing a call to %Fayetteville. Now, we
- knew that none of us had ever called Fayetteville, much less
- %Fayetteville, so we went through the usual ritual of calling up to
- complain. The response this time was totally unexpected. ``I'm
- sorry, sir, but our records show that that charge has already been
- investigated from a previous bill, and found to be justified.'' That
- was totally erroneous, and we could prove it -- we had all of our
- phone bills going back for quite some time. I told the agent this;
- she relented, and took the charge off the bill.
-
- We never did figure out where that call came from, what the % meant,
- or why GTE tried to claim that it was a call we had previously
- challenged.
-
- The second incident happened several years later, in Chapel Hill,
- after Southern Bell had (by order of the State Utilities Commission)
- bought out the local university-owned phone system, but before they'd
- had a chance to upgrade it to use a switch not seemingly hand-built by
- Strowger himself. They were running out of phone numbers on the
- exchanges, and they didn't want to expand the old switch because they
- were frantically trying to replace it with an ESS. So new customers,
- especially in the southern part of the service, were assigned phone
- numbers on the university Centrex system, and hence could abbreviate
- much of their dialing. In particular, when I wanted to call the port
- selector at the Comp Center, I'd dial 3-9911, instead of 933-9911.
- Now, I had one of the old mechanical, card-operated autodialers that
- somehow the local phone company didn't know about. This beast dialed
- quickly (for a pulse dialer), and sometimes the switch couldn't keep
- up. So, when the second digit arrived too soon, it would reset, and
- give me dial tone again -- just in time for the last three digits,
- 911...
-
- The rest of the Chapel Hill phone system was on a par with the switch,
- but I'll omit the details; they belong in Telecom Digest, or maybe the
- Museum of Horrors.
- --Steve Bellovin
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 2 May 90 15:40:08 EDT
- From: andras@sbcs.sunysb.edu
- Subject: More Phone Problems
-
-
- This is in relation to phone company billing practices, both ATT and
- Sprint. First an observation about AT&T and "instant credit".
-
- When one gets a bad international line, AT&T does not expect payment
- for the call. One can just call the operator, tell them what
- happened, and forget about it. Well, this is incorrect: one must call
- twice. The first call is right after the problem occurs. The
- operators cheerfully agree to immediate credit. At the end of the
- month, lo and behold, the call is still billed. This gives rise to a
- second call which finally settles the matter.
-
- It happened to me, and others I asked (I'm a graduate student, with
- lots of foreign nationals in the department.) I've once seen a
- friend's bill with a dozen or so failed overseas calls. All one
- minute long, all one right after another. All called in to the
- operator as soon as they were made.
-
- It's enough to make one suspect that it's deliberate; corporate
- customers especially might not keep accurate track of all short
- overseas calls.
-
- Now the Sprint story.
-
- A few months ago (Jan 20), I had occasion to make an international
- call to Europe (Romania). Not being up-to-date on the latest prices
- (I asked the operators, and apparently prices are no longer
- distributed; I guess you're expected to call every time you want to
- check.) I called the long-distance carriers I knew about, found that
- Sprint had the lowest rates by a fair margin, so I called them through
- their access number (my primary carrier is AT&T).
-
- When the bill arrived, it was about 50% higher than I expected. I
- called Sprint (Mar 2), and asked about their rates again, and they
- again quoted the same numbers. I then mentioned the bill. The
- operator did some more checking, then announced that yes, apparently
- they changed their rates at the beginning of the year (Jan 1), and
- that billing was done based on the new rates. She was apologetic, and
- said she would call this to the company's attention.
-
- Apparently Sprint was still giving out the old rates, three months
- after new rates were in effect!
- Andras
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 3 May 90 01:14:28 EDT
- From: abelinsk@sunee.waterloo.edu (Avi Belinsky)
- Subject: Phone Switch Resets (Webber, RISKS-9.88)
-
-
- Some interesting but unimportant trivia about this case. When
- I used to work at Bell Northern Research (research arm of Northern
- Telecom) someone in the know told me about this story. Apparently it
- was known internally as the gold ring problem. A disgruntled employee
- would run his gold wedding ring along the back of the Printed Circuit
- Boards and short the system, resetting it.
-
- For a telephone switch provider, where down time called for in
- tenders is one hour per forty years, the damage to their reputation
- was enormous. Apparently they lost millions tracking down this "bug"
- and even more in lost sales from the bad reputation this flagship
- switch generated. I believe they tracked it down by matching operator
- logs with system resets.
-
- I heard that the operator was later found floating dead in the
- Ottawa river :-)
-
-
- Avi Belinsky Electrical Engineering, University of Waterloo
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 8 May 90 09:46:06 -0700
- From: "David G. Novick" <novick@cse.ogi.edu>
- Subject: `Hacker' Alters Phone Services
-
-
- The Spring, 1990, issue of Visions, the Oregon Graduate Institute's
- quarterly magazine, has an interesting article on a man who broke into
- telephone computers, creating the kinds of disruptions that have been
- discussed lately on RISKS. The programmer, named Corey Lindsly, lives
- in Portland, OR. He was eventually arrested and pled guilty to a
- felony count of stealing long-distance phone service. Here is an
- excerpt.
-
- David
-
- Confessions of a Computer Hacker
- by Michael Rose
- Visions (Oregon Graduate Institute quarterly magazine)
- Spring, 1990
- ...
-
- Perhaps the most disturbing part of Lindsly's adventures was his
- penetration of AT&T Switching Control Center Systems. These sensitive
- computers support long distance telephone service. System
- administrators for 17 of these computers spent over 520 hours mopping
- up Lindsly's damages.
-
- According to [AT&T New Jersey manager of corporate security Allen]
- Thompson, Lindsly could have "severely disrupted" the nations's
- telephone service.
-
- Lindsly, however, bristles at the suggestion of his doing potentially
- dangerous stunts. Anything beyond harmless pranks is "beneath the
- hacker ethic and uncouth," he says.
-
- He does admit to disconnecting phones, changing billing status, and
- adding custom calling features. He also likes to convert residential
- lines to coin class service, so when the unwitting homeowner picked up
- his phone, a recorded voice would tell him to deposit 25 cents.
-
- "Swapping people's phone numbers ... now that was great trick," he
- recalls, with obvious amusement. "You would have your next door
- neighbor's number and he would have yours, and people would call you
- and and ask for your neighbor, and vice versa, and everyone's getting
- totally confused."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 10 May 90 09:48:33 -0700
- From: "David A. Honig" <honig@bonnie.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Subject: Risks of Caller Identification
-
-
- I recently had an unpleasant taste of the disadvantages of the caller
- identification that may be more widespread soon.
-
- A few weeks ago I called the university police's business line from my
- office phone and asked a few minutes of questions about how to find
- out about outstanding warrants (I had heard of someone getting
- arrested while renewing his driver's license). I informed the
- officer that I spoke with that this was entirely moot. After receiving
- my replies, I thought that was the end of it.
-
- Thus you can imagine my surprise and annoyance to find that two
- uniformed, armed officers and their sergeant came to my workplace
- (having located that using the campus centrex's caller-id ability on
- phones with appropriate displays), spoke with my coworkers, knocked on
- my office door, and via suprise and intimidation verified my ID. This
- permitted them to run a warrant check on me. I was clean, which was
- no surprise to me. They skulked away shortly thereafter.
-
- Conversations with the chief of police indicated that the rather
- zealous instigating officer's behavior was within "acceptable" bounds,
- and if you raise "enough" suspicion (on a slow day?), this constitutes
- justification for nosing about your workplace.
-
- The RISK is that the officer wouldn't have been able to easily trace
- the number except for the abilities of the private exchange.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 12 May 90 11:42:00 MDT
- From: "Gary McClelland" <gmcclella@clipr.colorado.edu>
- Subject: Avoiding ANI by Dialing 1-900 (Gary McClelland)
-
-
- Summary of report on All Things Considered (NPR), Friday, May 11, 1990:
-
- Private LInes, Inc. of Beverly Hills provides a telephone service for
- those wanting to avoid automatic number indentification. You simply
- call a 900 number which then lets you call out through Private Lines
- WATS numbers. ANI at the receiving end of course then displays only
- the Beverly Hills number of Private Lines. NPR interviewed president
- of Private LInes who defended need for such a service. He of course
- said that the service was not intended to help obscene callers and
- their rates would make obscene calling through Private LInes a very
- expensive habit ($2/minute, I think). (NPR noted that ANI had already
- resulted in several arrests of obscene callers in the Atlantic
- Southern area where ANI is heavily promoted for that purpose.) He
- cited the following legitimate reasons for avoiding ANI and any
- billing record of the numbers called. (1) Boss is quietly working on
- a merger deal and doesn't want secretaries and accountants in the firm
- noticing a sudden increase in calls to a particular other firm. (2)
- Separated spouse wants to call kids but doesn't want spouse to know
- from where he or she is calling. (3) Caller to crisis line or crime
- tip line wants to guarantee annonymity.
-
-
- Gary McClelland gmcclella@clipr.colorado.edu
-
- ***End of extract***
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest Special: RISKS Commentaries
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa23935;
- 19 May 90 19:24 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa08439;
- 19 May 90 17:53 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ac29935;
- 19 May 90 16:50 CDT
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 16:35:34 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #367
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005191635.ab28530@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sat, 19 May 90 16:35:04 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 367
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Pulse Speed (was Re: Alternative to Touch Tone) [C. D. Covington]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Brandon S. Allbery]
- Re: AT&T's Software Defined Network [Eric Schnoebelen]
- Re: Line Slip [Richard H. Gumpertz]
- Re: Sprint Card / WD40 Update [Henry Mensch]
- Re: 900-STOPPER [Douglas Scott Reuben]
- Measured Service [Jonathan A. Solomon]
- Public FAX Machine at Post Office [TELECOM Moderator]
- Where Can I Buy Caller ID Equipment? [Mike Black]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: "C. D. Covington" <uafhcx!cdc@uafhp.uark.edu>
- Subject: Re: Pulse Speed (was Re: Alternative to Touch Tone)
- Date: 19 May 90 19:06:00 GMT
- Organization: College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
-
-
- In article <7979@accuvax.nwu.edu>, nvuxr!deej@bellcore.bellcore.com
- (David Lewis) writes:
-
- > I dug out the Authoritative Reference, the LATA Switching System
- > Generic Requirements (LSSGR). In particular, LSSGR Section 6, Signaling.
- > It's also a handy document to have around.
-
- It's also $1825.00 for the paying crowd. Ouch.
-
-
- C. David Covington (WA5TGF) cdc@uafhcx.uark.edu (501) 575-6583
- Asst Prof, Elec Eng Univ of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR" <allbery@ncoast.org>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Reply-To: "Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR" <allbery@ncoast.org>
- Organization: North Coast Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, OH
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 18:54:01 GMT
-
- As quoted from <7897@accuvax.nwu.edu> by claris!netcom!ergo@
- ames.arc.nasa.gov (Rabinovitch Isaac):
-
- | It's *really* frustrating when software designers neglect to think
- | through issues like this. For example, which should a terminal
- | emulating program do when it the modem gives a "VOICE" return code?
- | Obviously, it should stop and demand correction from the nearest
- | carbon-based unit. But not only do none of them provide this feature,
- | but many are factory-configured to treat "VOICE" the same as "BUSY" --
- | which usually implies redialling the number! Hopefully, that hasn't
- | yet led to violence....
-
- My old US Robotics Microlink 2400 modem (now out of service, along
- with the rest of the computer it's installed in) mis-identified a busy
- signal as VOICE about a third of the time. This may be why VOICE is
- treated the same as BUSY.
-
- Many terminal programs can be configured as to the result codes they
- recognize. You might try changing VOICE to an error result. Or, if
- all else fails, use a binary file editor to change "VOICE" to
- something random.
-
-
- Me: Brandon S. Allbery VHF: KB8JRR on 224.50 (Lake County, OH)
- Internet: allbery@NCoast.ORG Delphi: ALLBERY
- uunet!cwjcc.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery America OnLine: BrandonA or KB8JRR
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Eric Schnoebelen <egsner.cirr.com!eric@cs.utexas.edu>
- Subject: Re: AT&T's Software Defined Network
- Date: 19 May 90 17:41:44 GMT
- Organization: Central Iowa (Model) Railroad, Dallas, Tx.
-
-
- In article <7944@accuvax.nwu.edu> covert@covert.enet.dec.com (John R.
- Covert 18-May-1990 0847) writes:
-
- - >But I'm wondering about "Software Defined Network"... Has ATT just
- - >figured out how to use software to configure their network? Why are
- - >they boasting about something which is old news?
-
- - >What they're boasting about is using software to define _your_ private
- - >network. This is a new offering.
-
- This is a new offering? I have been hearing of AT&T's SDN for
- at least two years. Granted, for the most of those two years, I was
- working for a network design house (JBA, Inc.)
-
- The other major interlata carriers also provide similar
- services, and have since at least early '87 (at least for corporate
- size accounts, like GM, Hughes, Unical, etc.) MCI offers VNET, which
- has at least three rate levels, and Sprint offers VPnet (I believe
- that is what it is called.) The other carriers also offer something
- similar.
-
- The virtual network services (which is what SDN, VNET and
- VPnet are) are very useful for integrating small and large networks
- together. Major corporations have been using them for the last few
- years to get their low use, out of the way sites (like the GM owned
- Bill's Chevy, in Timbuckto) connected to the main network, without
- having to pay for dedicated lines.
-
- Networks of this form are generally called Hybrid network,
- since they contain the normal private network dedicated lines, plus
- the addition of the virtual network services. The two major network
- design software houses, Telco Research, and JBA, have been supporting
- this sort of network design since '86, and I believe that JBA may have
- been the first. [I no longer work directly for JBA, but there are
- still lots of friends over there!]
-
-
- Eric Schnoebelen eric@cirr.com schnoebe@convex.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Richard H. Gumpertz" <rhg@cpsolv.cps.com>
- Subject: Re: Line Slip
- Date: 19 May 90 15:44:17 GMT
- Reply-To: "Richard H. Gumpertz" <cpsolv!rhg@uunet.uu.net>
- Organization: Computer Problem Solving, Leawood, Kansas
-
-
- In article <7574@accuvax.nwu.edu> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 336, Message 10 of 15
-
- >We have similar problems, but at 2400 baud. The sequence of characters
- >is always "~r" or "<DEL>{". The same behaviour has been observed with
-
- The last time I had problems with this, it turned out to be the PBX.
- The trunk line cards had two settings for the 4-2 line hybrid: 600 and
- 900 ohm. Due to the QA testing procedure testing 600 ohm last, that
- is the way they were shipped. Unfortunately, 900 ohm is usually a
- better approximation of correct balance for most CO lines in the USA
- (your mileage may vary).
-
- Anyway, each time a trunk card was replaced in the switch, we got ~r
- and the like on our modems. We finally got all the technicians
- trained to set the jumper before installing a new card and we never
- had the problem again.
-
-
- | Richard H. Gumpertz rhg@CPS.COM (913) 642-1777 or (816) 891-3561 |
- | Computer Problem Solving, 8905 Mohawk Lane, Leawood, Kansas 66206-1749 |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 14:42:32 -0400
- From: Henry Mensch <henry@garp.mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: Sprint Card / WD40 Update
- Reply-To: henry@garp.mit.edu
-
-
- My credit didn't turn up, either, so I called and got an
- overly-pleasant southern gentleman on the line who organized the
- credit (it amounts to something like $7.50 or so). It will appear on
- my bill in the next 45 days (why so long?).
-
- He was prepared to give me a spiel about how the promotion works, but
- (armed with the information on the can) he applied the credit
- immediately.
-
- # Henry Mensch / <henry@garp.mit.edu> / E40-379 MIT, Cambridge, MA
- # <hmensch@uk.ac.nsfnet-relay> / <henry@tts.lth.se> / <mensch@munnari.oz.au>
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: The reason for the 45-day quote on the credit was
- because they bill in cycles. Charges/credits arriving within a day or
- so of the cycle billing cutoff are too late for inclusion in the bill
- currently being prepared. Those charges/credits will be held for the
- next bill, which will be 30 days later, more or less. He could have as
- likewise told you, "The credit will appear on your next bill or the
- one following" and been accurate in his statement. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 19-MAY-1990 15:57:55.56
- From: "DOUGLAS SCOTT REUBEN)" <DREUBEN@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Subject: Re: 900-STOPPER
-
-
- One other way to defeat Caller*ID would be to go down to your local
- COCOT and use their AOS ... Or, if no COCOT is available, dial your
- favorite AOS's Equal Access code from a Bell phone and place the call
- through them.
-
- (Of course the call would probably cost a *LOT* more than $2, but it
- still is another way to defeat 900-STOPPER! :-) )
-
- Speaking of COCOTs, the matter of COCOTs making their own collect
- calls came up on the Digest recently. These are the type that have a
- voice- synthesized recording saying "Hello, this is your operator...to
- place a Collect Call, dial "1" now. For operator assistance, please
- press 3." After you press "1" (assuming you want a collect call), the
- COCOT asks you to state your name, records it digitally (?), and then
- calls the desired party to ascertain whether they will accept charges
- for the call.
-
- Assuming all this works, and assuming the called party accepts the
- call, how is this billed? IE, since this doesn't go through an AOS,
- how does the payphone tell whatever billing agency it uses the costs
- of the call? Does the COCOT upload the call data to some service
- overnight? (In a similar manner to those COCOTS, which I suspect are
- now illegal, which used to take your calling card number, try it out
- on the Bell/AT&T Calling Card system, and if it worked put the call
- through direct-dial but billed you at whatever ridiculous rates the
- merchant set.)
-
- Also, does the merchant make more from these sort of calls than those
- handled by the AOS? IE, is there a difference in what the merchant who
- owns the COCOT makes if I dial "1" to make a collect call via the
- COCOT or dial "3" to make a collect call through the AOS?
-
- I've also noticed that after a certain period of time, the COCOT will
- just let the call through, and usually not hang up. I've never tried
- calling myself this way, but I wonder if the COCOT decides to bill you
- in a case like this... (Knowing how AOSs work, probably yes!)
-
- New England Tel. has a automated collect call/third party call system,
- which is somewhat similar, yet *it* can't be fooled into letting the
- call through like the COCOT does. For example, the COCOT system has no
- way of checking that the number you are calling can accept collect
- calls. It has a limited capacity to filter out collect calls to
- Area-code-555-1212 calls and numbers like that (976, etc...), but will
- allow collect calls to almost ANY other number, even 936 information
- numbers.
-
- So you could call another payphone from the COCOT, a friend at that
- payphone could accept the charges, and the COCOT would let the call
- through, thinking it was a valid destination number. The New England
- Tel system would never allow this, as it checks a database of all
- "allowable" phone numbers, and if it sees a payphone will say "That
- number is a payphone and can not accept collect calls".
-
- I still don't see why merchants think COCOTs are "good for business"! :-)
-
-
- Doug
-
- dreuben@eagle.wesleyan.edu
- dreuben@wesleyan.bitnet
- (and just plain old "dreuben" to locals...! :-) )
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 1990 16:39:25 EDT
- From: "Jonathan A. Solomon" <jsol@eddie.mit.edu>
- Subject: Measured Service
-
-
- I'd like to reduce the cost of having phone service to the bare
- minimum, but I have to maintain two lines since I have a modem (well,
- my conscience tells me I don't REALLY have to maintain two lines). One
- of those lines has to be flat rate. The other could be measured. If I
- could find DEFINITE quotes from the PUC regulations regarding
- telephone service, or a way of fighting the NET service reps who don't
- seem to want to let me have that sort of service configuration, please
- respond to jsol@eddie.mit.edu.
-
- Just so you understand the magnitude of this, I was originally
- spending $100.00/month on local phone service. Metropolitan service,
- custom calling, two or three lines depending, 800 service. I now have
- it down to $30.00. Measured service on one line would bring the cost
- down to $20.00. I can't do with measured service on my data line
- since I am on it quite a bit.
-
-
- jsol
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 15:52:00 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Public FAX Machine at Post Office
-
-
- When I went to my post office box Friday night, I found a new
- convenience had been installed in the lobby, namely a public FAX
- machine, which for $8.50 per three minutes, will send or receive FAX
- documents from anywhere.
-
- This particular post office branch, called 'Loop Station', is located
- at 211 South Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60604. It is open 24 hours,
- seven days per week, and its only purpose is to serve about 10,000
- post office boxes in the 60690 zip code, which is strictly boxes -- no
- actual street addresses. The post office is heavily dominated by the
- large banks and other business houses in downtown Chicago. There are
- very few 'private' individuals holding boxes there. A call counter for
- large packages (and 'phantom box', i.e. remittance-banking, etc), a
- copy machine, pay phones (genuine Illinois Bell, thank you!) and some
- vending machines for postage stamps made up the scene. I like doing
- business there because of the anomynity: go in at 3 AM on Tuesday to
- get your mail if you like.
-
- As of Friday, a coin-operated FAX machine was added. Using your credit
- card in the slot on the machine, you can send or receive FAX messages.
- *The use of the attached phone does not require your credit card*
- however, as a few simple experiments demonstrated.
-
- A video display guides you through the process. You touch the screen
- on the appropriate menu item, then it gives further instructions, etc.
- One menu item was entitled, 'Call for Customer Assistance'. You were
- then instructed to lift the handset attached and wait for an answer.
-
- Lifting the handset without touching the screen produced a dead line,
- much like an old-fashioned coin phone with no money deposited.
- Touching the 'customer service' option on the menu brought the phone
- to life with dial tone. About three seconds later, an autodialer tone
- dialed a number somewhere, which connected to the company which had
- installed the machine. Flashing the switchook at that point
- disconnected the call to customer service, and returned dial tone. A
- pocket dialer held to the handset at that point allowed calls
- anywhere! I should mention the 'phone' in this case was simply an
- armored handset attached to the FAX machine, which itself was a rather
- large device -- almost the size of a large copy machine such as used
- in a big office.
-
- The strangest part of all this was the way the phone line to the FAX
- machine had been connected: The usual four-conductor phone cable came
- out the back side, was tacked on the side of the wall over to one of
- the payphones, and a standard modular jack had been mounted there with
- two-sided tape on the wall. Plugging into the modular jack with a
- phone produced the results expected: A dial tone to anywhere. No need
- at that point to deceive the FAX machine and its autodialer! From the
- modular jack, the wires ran into the wall next to the payphone,
- obviously just tying into some unused pair at that point.
-
- I am tempted to spend $8.50 to receive a FAX there so it will tell me
- what number the other end must dial to reach me. Or maybe instead of
- that approach it dials the other end and they must go into 'send' mode
- rather than 'receive mode'.
-
- In any event, isn't it strange and quite a security risk to have an
- open phone line, so easily defeated, in a public place open 24 hours
- per day? Why don't the people who provide those services ask
- *someone* for assistance or advice before they go off on a tangent
- putting their machines in? I'll be surprised if that corner of the
- lobby in the post office doesn't soon become a phraud-hive, to say
- nothing of vandalism to the flimsy wiring and phone jack.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
- Post Office Box 1570
- Chicago, IL 60690
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Mike Black <black@seismo.css.gov>
- Subject: Where Can I Buy Caller ID Equipment?
- Date: 19 May 90 15:41:53 GMT
- Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
-
-
- What's available for providing Caller ID to a home user? I've heard a
- lot about it recently but haven't seen any product availability.
-
- Mike
-
- [Moderator's Note: If you haven't received mail order solicitations
- and notices from your local telco, then Caller ID is not yet available
- in your area. There are boxes for sale from various mail-order
- sources, but they are for naught until your telco actually starts
- sending out the information. Don't bother buying a box until you can
- actually use it; and when that time comes your telco among others will
- have plenty to tell you on the subject. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #367
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa01203;
- 20 May 90 12:29 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab05808;
- 20 May 90 11:00 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa26162;
- 20 May 90 9:56 CDT
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 9:24:36 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #368
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005200924.ab27108@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sun, 20 May 90 09:24:01 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 368
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Micro-PBX For Home Use [Dave Platt]
- FCC REN Numbers (was: BT Phones, etc) [Julian Macassey]
- Telephones, Technology, and the Media [John Higdon]
- Interesting Police Technology [Douglas Mason]
- Need New UUCP Access [Brian Capouch]
- Verification of Numbers Furnished to ONI [David Lesher]
- Re: Banks Charge Universal Card Violates Laws [Dave Rand]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Thomas Lapp]
- Re: Public FAX Machine at Post Office [Henry Mensch]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Dave Platt <dplatt@coherent.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 22:00:20 PDT
- Subject: Micro-PBX For Home Use
-
-
- I've decided that it's time to do something more flexible with our two
- phone lines, than the current setup (one for voice, one for outgoing
- modem calls). At a minimum, I'd like to be able to use the second
- line as a forward-when-busy catcher for the first line, and have our
- answering machine be able to pick up either line ... my wife spends a
- fair bit of time on the phone to clients during the day, hates to miss
- calls, and _really_ dislikes Call Waiting.
-
- Having the two lines combined into a hunt-group isn't a problem ($20
- setup fee, plus $.50/line/month); it's cheaper in the long run than
- programmable call-forwarding. However, we have a substantial
- investment in single-line phone equipment (speakerphone, dialer,
- answering machine, etc.), and I'd rather not dump it all and buy
- two-line versions. I'd like to have some additional flexibility for
- the future, too.
-
- The least expensive approach would seem to be a $22 gadget from Radio
- Splut, which will enable the single-line answering machine to pick up
- whichever line happens to ring. For a similar amount of money, I
- could add a two-line selector to our main telephone, and leave the
- other equipment in a strictly single-line mode.
-
- What other solutions are available today? I remember reading a digest
- article a while ago about a nice micro-PBX (sort of), which would
- support several outside lines, half a dozen or more stations (standard
- tone phones, I believe), and could be programmed quite flexibly. I
- _think_ the unit in question was a Panasonic ... unfortunately, I
- failed to save the article.
-
- What are people using for this sort of situation? How expensive is
- it? Is it affected by the anti-dumping tariff which I understand is
- now in place? Will it be upgradable to support basic ISDN subscriber
- (2B+D) capabilities? What are its quirks and benefits?
-
- Please email responses if possible; I'll send a summary to the
- moderator for posting if appropriate.
-
- advTHANKSance!
-
-
- Dave Platt VOICE: (415) 493-8805
- UUCP: ...!{ames,apple,uunet}!coherent!dplatt DOMAIN: dplatt@coherent.com
- INTERNET: coherent!dplatt@ames.arpa, ...@uunet.uu.net
- USNAIL: Coherent Thought Inc. 3350 West Bayshore #205 Palo Alto CA 94303
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Julian Macassey <julian@bongo.uucp>
- Subject: FCC REN Numbers (Was: BT Phones, etc)
- Date: 20 May 90 01:24:44 GMT
- Organization: The Hole in the Wall Hollywood California U.S.A.
-
-
- In article <7911@accuvax.nwu.edu>, tell@oscar.cs.unc.edu (Stephen
- Tell) writes:
-
- > In article <7832@accuvax.nwu.edu> julian@bongo.uucp (Julian Macassey)
- > writes:
- > X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 354, Message 11 of 11
-
- > >In the US, a standard gong
- > >ringer is assigned a "Ringer Equivalence Number" of 1. A standard
- > >phone line will ring 5 of these ringers or an REN of 5. Some
- > >electronic ringers have RENs of 0.5 etc so you can usually get more of
- > >these on the line than gongs.
-
- > What is the conversion factor between RENs and somthing your average
- > EE can understand, like "milliamps at 90vrms, 20Hz?"
-
- > I've been thinking about how to build a ring generator for some
- > homebrew-PBX experiments, and would like to know how much current I
- > need to put out per phone.
-
- Anyone wanting to design and build telephone equipment needs a
- copy of Part 68. In there, in the wonderful obtuseness of Bureaucrat
- speak is everything you want to know.
-
- In part 68, "Paragraph 68.312 On-hook impedance limitations"
- Read section D "Ringer Equivalence Definition" That will refer you to
- the notorious Table 1. To save you the trouble of waiting for your own
- copy of Part 68, here is the pertinent line from Table 1.
-
- Ringing | Range of compatible | Simulated ringing voltage |Imped-
- type | ringing frequencies Hz| superimposed on 525 V DC | ance
- | | |limita-
- | | | ion
- | | | (ohms)
- A 20 +- 3 and 30 +- 3 40 to 130 volts rms 1400
- 1000
- B 15.3 to 68.0 40 to 150 volts rms 1600
-
-
- Now take the above data and read D (iv) which says:
-
- (iv) Five times the impedance limitation listed in Table I,
- (sic) below, divided by the minimum measured ac impedance, defined as
- in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section, during the application of
- simulated ringing as listed in Table I.
-
- Pretty clear and simple eh?
-
- Anyhow, don't forget that Part 68 is an FCC doc dealing with
- registration of equipment (Phones, modems etc) connected to the
- telephone network (Stuff plugged into jacks, or as Bell used to say
- "Customer Provided Equipment - CPE). There is no doubt a Bell doc on
- what sort of guff a ring generator should spew out. For collectors of
- such matters, the Bell Pub dealing with POTS telephone specs is Bell
- Pub 48005. A good read with some obtuse language and requirements that
- used to baffle AT&T folks when I asked for clarification.
-
- Gazing through my Bellcore catalog, I see Bell Pub 43001 -
- Metallic facilities Central Offices. This could have ringing info, for
- $99.75 you can buy it and find out.
-
- Hope this helps.
-
-
- Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo.info.com ucla-an!denwa!bongo!julian
- N6ARE@K6IYK (Packet Radio) n6are.ampr.org [44.16.0.81] voice (213) 653-4495
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Telephones, Technology, and the Media
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com>
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Date: 19 May 90 21:51:08 PDT (Sat)
- From: John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com>
-
-
- Think of the last story you read in the newspaper concerning any
- technological matter. Was it complete, or was it simplified to the
- point that little useful information was available? What information
- there was, was it accurate, misleading, or downright erroneous?
-
- How on earth can the public be expected to make rational decisions
- regarding its telecommunications when the media (the prime source of
- current affairs education for the great unwashed) does such a
- miserable job of presenting the biggest legal upset of all time:
- divestiture? OK, what got Higdon started *this* time, you ask? It was
- the "2600" article.
-
- The media thrives on sensationalism. If some kid stumbles onto the
- password for the root access for some company's computer, the media
- will look for any way to assure the public that "no lives were lost,
- and there were apparently no injuries." Accuracy in the reporting of
- hackers' exploits? Why bother?! Accuracy when informing the public
- about the ramifications of the new telephonic choices in the
- marketplace? Well, only if it swings, if you know what I mean.
-
- Remember, we are dealing with an institution with a highly-visible
- double standard. Drug problem? Well, it's going to take extreme
- measures to deal with that, even the suspension of a few
- constitutional rights. Computer hacking? Now, that's really scary. The
- newspapers and broadcasters have been more than eager to tell us that
- Morris got just a slap on the wrist. To hear it told, he probably
- should have been strung up. Never mind that notables such as Steve
- Wozniak have gently pointed out that computer hacking is not nearly
- the threat to mankind that those who's livelihood depend on the
- opposite perception by the public say it is. The media says, "Sweep
- them all into the jug."
-
- But let one Sheriff's deputy stroll into the city room and ask for
- some reporter's notes on a sensitive case. The front and editorial
- pages light up with the latest assault on "the rights of a free
- press". The weeping and wailing abounds.
-
- That having been said, why would we even consider that an article on
- "Long Distance Providers" would contain any more than a ghostly
- outline of reality? It would seem that our friendly print and
- electronic journalists consider the public to be completely
- uninterested in matters such as telephony, particularly on a technical
- level. Maybe they are right, but it would be different if something
- other than a lackluster, error-ridden presentation was offered.
-
- Until the day comes when those who profess to provide us with
- information actually do so, anyone wanting to gather enough data to
- make informed choices, or simply wanting to form some intelligent
- opinions will have to dig out the facts from alternative sources, of
- which is forum is one.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@zygot.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Douglas Mason <douglas@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Interesting Police Technology
- Reply-To: douglas@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Douglas Mason)
- Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Wheeling, IL
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 23:57:19 GMT
-
-
- Something interesting that the police in Ottawa County (Holland,
- Michigan) are doing now is putting cellular phones and fax machines in
- their police cars!
-
- While cellular phones are increasingly more common in police cars, fax
- machines are new. Holland, Michigan is the first to use such devices
- in all of the police cars and trucks.
-
- Also, all of the area judges have fax machines at their homes. What
- is the reason for all of this?
-
- Now, when police find that they have a potential arrest situation,
- they can get a fax of the search warrant or arrest warrant signed by a
- judge to them in seconds. If they have a suspicious car or truck
- pulled over a search warrant takes only a matter of seconds, 24 hours
- a day.
-
- The cellular phones also allow an increasing degree of security from
- (most) police scanners.
-
- Found this out when I was in Holland over the weekend. Thought it
- might be interesting to some of the fellow net-people. I'm not so
- sure I like the idea of the fax machines. I hear that people get
- instant warrants for "drunk driving" now and the like. Apparently the
- judges have a rotating schedule to be bothered in the middle of the
- night to sign these faxes.
-
-
- Douglas T. Mason | douglas@ddsw1.UUCP or dtmason@m-net |
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: In Chicago, a limited number of police cars have
- been equipped with terminals for several years; the number of cars
- thus equipped is growing, it may be up to 25 percent now. These
- terminals can do license plate checks as well as get records from the
- NCIC, a federal data base of criminals. For the rest of the police
- cars, the officers have to call in their request, and wait 5-20
- minutes for a response, depending. While the police radios transmit
- in the 460.05 ==> 460.500 range, the terminals are up around 812 megs
- someplace. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 16:52:33 -0500 (CDT)
- From: Brian Capouch <brianc@zeta.saintjoe.edu>
- Subject: Need New UUCP Access
-
-
- I'm about to lose part of my connection to the Internet, and need to
- seek out some help from Digest readers.
-
- How can I supplant my current on-line access, at least as far as email
- is concerned, with access through UUCP? My machine is a Mac; I'm in
- possession of UUCP software for the machine, but don't know either
- where or how to obtain a dial-up hook to send/receive mail.
-
- I would be grateful for any help that could be proffered. If it
- wouldn't be of interest to the group as a whole, please email me
- directly. Thanks in advance.
-
-
- Brian Capouch
- Saint Joseph's College
- brianc@saintjoe.edu
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Isn't there some public access site near you which
- would allow you to poll them? PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: Verification of Numbers Furnished to ONI
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 18:42:25 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
-
- | There *is* a verification system of sorts which has been
- |implemented to deter ONI "fibbing" :-).
-
- (Larry goes on to describe a 'busy test' method)
-
- One problem. Lots of ONI calls were/are on party lines. Give another
- party's #....
-
- I'm not sure how this fits, but my friend JB once took a TT phone to
- his (party line service) parent's in Avon, OH (216-937). In those
- days, that was part of Lorain Telephone Co. The 'undertaker' CO was
- just down the street. You could almost here it from the road as you
- drove by ;-}
-
- The TT set work fine on local calls, as the switch faithfully
- outpulsed each tone's translation. (yawn) But when he made a LD call,
- the intercept operator came up with a very puzzled note to her
- 'nummberlpeze' query. She asked him to call again. He did, with a
- rotary set. She sounded relieved.
-
- Any idea what was going on?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dave Rand <dlr@daver.bungi.com>
- Subject: Re: Banks Charge Universal Card Violates Laws
- Organization: Association for the Prevention of Polar Bears and Kangaroos
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 20:56:07 GMT
-
-
- In article <7947@accuvax.nwu.edu> baumgart@esquire.dpw.com writes:
-
- >Excerpted from {The New York Times}, Friday May 18, 1990, Page D1:
-
- > The American Telephone and Telegraph Company's complex
- > arrangements to sponsor a bank credit card are drawing criticism
- > from rivals in the business.
-
-
- U S Sprint, not to be outdone, has included the following notice in
- the latest bill (arrived today).
-
- "Now... a VISA card and a US Sprint FONCARD _all in one!_
-
- The buying power of Visa, America's most valued credit card and the
- calling ability of the US Sprint FONCARD, America's only 100% digital
- _F_iber _O_ptic _N_etwork log distance travel card. _Together in one
- card._ A card that offers exceptional advantages - including all the
- travel benegits of the Visa Gold Card."
-
- APR for purchases is listed as 17.99%, with a $25/year Annual Fee.
- The card is issed through State Street Bank and Trust company, Boston,
- MA. Additional disclosure information/changes are available from
- 800-446-7625.
-
- Looks like this is just the beginning.
-
-
- Dave Rand
- {pyramid|mips|sun|vsi1}!daver!dlr Internet: dlr@daver.bungi.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 15:58:33 EDT
- From: Thomas Lapp <thomas%mvac23.uucp@udel.edu>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
-
-
- Dave Mc Mahan <claris!netcom!mcmahan@ames.arc.nasa.gov>...
-
- > It's not Sprint or MCI, it's the Telebit. From my understanding,
- > Telebit modems don't work worth squat when the signal is digitized.
- > Seems that the digitizing screws up the phasing of the modem signal
- > (why? I don't know) and AT&T uses analog all along the signal path.
-
- I question this. In some AT&T education I received recently, the
- instructors (who are employed by AT&T) said in the class that the
- channels between POPs are now all fiber (or 98% or so). If you get
- analog, it is in that distance between the AT&T POP and your local
- office and/or out to your site. Even if AT&T is not 100% fiber
- between POPs, your chances of getting a fiber link over a switched
- channel are pretty good.
-
- So this is why I am surprised to hear your say that AT&T uses analog
- the whole way.
-
- > the effect. If there is interest, e-mail me and I'll ask him for a
- > more detailed description of the problem causes and what Telebit plans
- > on doing about it (if anything).
-
- You knew we'd be doing this: Please get us more details on this
- problem.
-
- - tom
-
- internet : mvac23!thomas@udel.edu or thomas%mvac23@udel.edu
- uucp : {ucbvax,mcvax,psuvax1,uunet}!udel!mvac23!thomas
- Europe Bitnet: THOMAS1@GRATHUN1 Location: Newark, DE, USA
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 90 22:59:20 -0400
- From: Henry Mensch <henry@garp.mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: Public FAX Machine at Post Office
- Reply-To: henry@garp.mit.edu
-
-
- Australia Post has provided a similar service for some time ...
-
-
- # Henry Mensch / <henry@garp.mit.edu> / E40-379 MIT, Cambridge, MA
- # <hmensch@uk.ac.nsfnet-relay> / <henry@tts.lth.se> / <mensch@munnari.oz.au>
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #368
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa01376;
- 20 May 90 23:38 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa22125;
- 20 May 90 22:09 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa03497;
- 20 May 90 21:05 CDT
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 20:27:16 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #369
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005202027.ab15670@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sun, 20 May 90 20:26:31 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 369
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: 900-STOPPER [Jonathan A. Solomon]
- 900-STOPPER Alternatives (was Re: 900-STOPPER) [David Tamkin]
- Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media [Paul Colley]
- Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media [J. Eric Townsend]
- Re: Measured Service [Jerry Leichter]
- Re: 950 Numbers in Canada [David Tamkin]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Robert Gutierrez]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 19 May 1990 18:49:40 EDT
- From: "Jonathan A. Solomon" <jsol@eddie.mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: 900-STOPPER
-
-
- That last message about ANI describes a problem that can't be fixed.
- Calling a crisis line or having a divorced spouce calling their kids
- may be a crime if ani is not provided. Also, a boss can easily get a
- private number (and most bosses have that) which is not connected to
- the secretaries line and which is billed directly to his office (where
- he can tell if his secretary opened it and subsequently fire her).
-
- Allowing someone to call a 1-900 number to avoid ANI is like telling
- someone to dial my number and have me forward it. I suspect you can
- get sued for providing such a service in violation of the law. To do
- it right would require an operator.
-
- You either have ANI or you don't. 1-900-KILL-ANI is on my bill, so if
- officers want to check out if I had called 1-212-234-5234 they can
- assume that if they know more about the case that 1-900-KILL-ANI will
- give them a clue, and a court order will cause the 900 number provider
- to give up the number (I'm sure they keep track ... they have to). So
- much for breaking the law.
-
- I can imagine some insurance companies and merchants using this
- service to harrass customers into purchasing their services, foiling
- the ANI services, but you have to admit, $2/minute is alot to spend
- for anonymity, especially when it can't be guaranteed.
-
-
- I have spoken.
- jsol
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 18:40 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: 900-STOPPER Alternatives (was 900-STOPPER)
-
-
- Patrick Townson wrote in volume 10, issue 364, regarding use of a
- cellular phone to stymie Caller-ID:
-
- |[Moderator's Note: You don't have to even bother roaming. If my cellular
- |phone number is captured, a call to IBT Name and Address Bureau (312 or
- |708) 796-9600 produces a response, "It's a mobile number. We don't have
- |any other information." (click). That seems to be the rule on all cell
- |numbers in this area. PT]
-
- Actually, that would apply to any unlisted number. My point, however,
- is that silence from the Customer Name and Address people is not
- enough protection. The callee cannot get your address and thus cannot
- send you junk mail or knock on your door, but it (along with everyone
- who buys its lists) still knows that the number from which you dialed
- belongs to someone who expressed an interest in the callee's service
- or product. Maybe your name has to go onto the list as unknown, but
- your phone number still gets keypunched, and you get the pleasure of
- receiving telemarketing calls and paying for the airtime to hear them.
-
- At least, I'm assuming that staying off telemarketing lists is the
- reason you want to place the unidentified call. An unlisted but
- displayed number wouldn't stop an obscene phone call investigation, I
- trust, but as far as I know neither Patrick nor Doug would have that
- particular reason to mask Caller-ID.
-
- Moreover, a callee with Call Block can add the originating number of
- the most recent caller to the refusal list without needing to know the
- number, so if the number is delivered, even if CNA won't say who has
- it, it can still be added.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: pacolley@violet.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Colley)
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 20:06:05 GMT
-
-
- In article <8008@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com> writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 368, Message 3 of 9
-
- >Think of the last story you read in the newspaper concerning any
- >technological matter. Was it complete, or was it simplified to the
- >point that little useful information was available? What information
- >there was, was it accurate, misleading, or downright erroneous?
-
- >But let one Sheriff's deputy stroll into the city room and ask for
- >some reporter's notes on a sensitive case. The front and editorial
- >pages light up with the latest assault on "the rights of a free
- >press". The weeping and wailing abounds.
-
- Maybe there is hope yet. My ``favourite'' daily paper here is the
- {Toronto Star}, and appears to be heavily computerized. At least, they
- blame some types of errors on the software used in composing news
- articles...
-
- Perhaps this is just another ``blame the computer'' excuse, but if
- they really are using computers as much as they claim, maybe we can
- hope for more technically literate and informed reporting in the
- future.
-
- Perhaps all that is needed (in regards to the 2600 article) is to get
- the press addicted to the benefits of electronic mail. Interception
- of anyone's electronic mail and seizure of the computers used may then
- generate ``front and editorial pages lit up with the latest assault on
- the rights of a free society'' (changing John's statement).
-
-
- Paul Colley
- Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo
- Waterloo, Canada
- pacolley@violet.waterloo.edu or .ca
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "j. eric townsend" <jet@karazm.math.uh.edu>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 18:11:46 CDT
-
-
- I think this discussion might belong in comp.dcom.telecom for a couple
- of more messages. (My qualifications to make such a statement: I'll
- take my Journalism BA/minor COSC this fall, and either take a BSCS or
- enter grad school in communications theory next fall...)
-
- In article <8008@accuvax.nwu.edu> it was written:
-
- >How on earth can the public be expected to make rational decisions
- >regarding its telecommunications when the media (the prime source of
- >current affairs education for the great unwashed) does such a
- >miserable job of presenting the biggest legal upset of all time:
- >divestiture?
-
- Technical stories do not sell newspapers, unfortunately. In more than
- one of my journalism classes, we discussed how technical an article
- can get before people stop reading it.
-
- The biggest problem: A news story has to explain enough background so
- that the story will make sense to people who don't understand what a
- PBX is, or why password security is flaky, etc.
-
- The second biggest problem is lack of knowledge on the reporter's
- part. Most major papers still don't have any sort of "technology
- beat", where a reporter who knows what a PBX is (and better still, how
- to talk about it in English :-) regularly covers technology stories.
-
- Combine the lack of concern with technology as a beat with the
- amazingly low salaries of most reporters, and you get bad journalism.
- The salaries really are miserable. A few years ago, starting salary
- at the New York Times for a reporter was around $45,000 a year.
- Realize that you need probably 5-10 years of experience at a major
- daily to get hired at the NYT as a "real" reporter. (And a few year's
- experience at least at a small daily or weekly to get on to a major
- daily.)
-
- I'd like to do a technology beat at a paper, but I can't afford to.
- If I'm going to take a writing job, it's going to be technical
- writing, so I can at least pay my bills and support my 'puter habit.
-
- >Remember, we are dealing with an institution with a highly-visible
- >double standard. Drug problem? Well, it's going to take extreme
- >measures to deal with that, even the suspension of a few
- >constitutional rights.
-
- I challenge you to show me a newspaper editorial that suggests
- suspending the constitution to solve any of our current problems.
-
- >Until the day comes when those who profess to provide us with
- >information actually do so, anyone wanting to gather enough data to
- >make informed choices, or simply wanting to form some intelligent
- >opinions will have to dig out the facts from alternative sources, of
- >which is forum is one.
-
- Uh, if you think you can get (and trust) your information from only
- one source, you should rethink your belief system. I read the NYT on
- a regular basis, but I don't automagically believe everything (or
- anything) I read there.
-
- 2600 is a low-rent journal for techies (which isn't bad, it's just the
- part of the world they occupy).
-
- Finally, if you think it's so easy, give it a try yourself. :-).
- There are plenty of papers that'd love to pay you about $25,000/yr for
- you to relate your knowledge gained at a much higher expense.
-
-
- J. Eric Townsend -- University of Houston Dept. of Mathematics (713) 749-2120
- Internet: jet@uh.edu Bitnet: jet@UHOU Skate UNIX(r).
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 10:16:15 EDT
- From: leichter@lrw.com
- Subject: Re: Measured Service
-
-
- Jonathan Solomon would like to know if there is a way to get measured
- service on one of two lines, flat rate on the other. My experience
- has been that this is officially forbidden. However, telco's don't go
- very far out of their way to check - in fact, they usually ASK you if
- there is another phone line at the same address. You can simply say
- "no".
-
- Of course, if you are having the two lines billed together, this
- probably won't work, as it'll show up on the service records. Get
- them to send you separate bills first - no cost, minor hassle. (I
- used to send the two bills back in a single envelope with a single
- check; I marked the check with the amounts to credit to each line. In
- several years, they only got this wrong once, applying the entire
- check to one of the two lines. No big deal; the total amount of money
- was the same, I just had to allocate it to correct the imbalance on
- the next bill.) I'd give them at least a couple of days after that
- change before trying to get the service class changed, just to let
- things settle down.
-
- It's not nice to lie to Mom, but sometimes it's the only way to get
- things done.
-
- -- Jerry
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 18:49 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: 950 Numbers in Canada
-
-
- Marcel Mongeon wrote in volume 10, issue 356:
-
- |I have frequently seen mention of 950 telephone numbers. Up here in
- |Canada, because we have yet to discover alternate long distance service,
- |they don't really mean anything (I think).
-
- |Can some of these 950 numbers be dialed over an 800 number? If so, would
- |someone mind sending me or posting a list of all of the different 800-950
- |numbers. I would like to see if these can be dialed from Canada. If
- |they are, I can then get a family member to subscribe to one of them for
- |me and then use an alternate carrier.
-
- US Sprint no longer uses a 950 number but has switched to 800.
- Telecom*USA never did use 950, and I believe AT&T never did either.
- (Actually, I have no idea how to place a call through AT&T from a
- phone where 10288 is blocked.) US Sprint and Telecom*USA have also
- both told me that their calling cards will not function from Canada.
-
- MCI uses both 950-1022 and 800-950-1022 (in the 800 pseudo-NPA, 950 is
- an ordinary prefix, but it belongs to MCI and they take advantage of
- its recognition factor). MCI told me that dialing 1-800-950-1022 (but
- not 950-1022) and using an MCI calling card will work from Canada, but
- I don't know whether their rates would be any lower than Bell Canada's
- are. MCI bills my charges directly to my MasterCard (they also accept
- VISA); they might not do that for a card issued by a Canadian bank,
- and you'd somehow have to pay them in US funds.
-
- Moreover, MCI will not open an account with a Canadian billing
- address. You'd have to get some relative or friend in the United
- States to own the account. I'd advise, after my own difficulties with
- MCI's trying to reaffiliate me, asking someone who already has MCI as
- primary 1+ carrier to request an additional calling card (which you
- would use) or finding someone who has successfully established a
- calling card-only account with MCI to request an additional card.
- Either of those options lets out having your billing sent to
- MasterCard or VISA; you'd somehow have to reimburse the owners of the
- account (in green money) for your share of a combined bill. On the
- other hand, your calls and theirs would accumulate together toward
- volume discounts.
-
- If you want to try to use charge card billing to make the funds
- conversion simpler, you could ask a friend in the US who has no
- relation with MCI to try to open a calling-card only account (that way
- all charges on the account would be yours to pay, though the rep I
- spoke with wasn't sure whether MCI could set up billing to a charge
- card issued by a Canadian bank anyway), but your friend would risk
- going through what I did, so I recommend a relative for this approach:
- friends, after all, can be lost.
-
- MCI's customer service number (1-800-444-4444) is dialable from Canada
- if you have more questions. I've no relationship with them except as
- a [note absence of adjective] customer.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Robert Gutierrez <ranma@calvin.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 21 May 90 00:07:11 GMT
- Reply-To: Robert Gutierrez <ranma@calvin.arc.nasa.gov>
- Organization: NASA Science Internet Network Operations.
-
-
- john@bovine.ati.com (John Higdon) writes:
-
- > I have learned indirectly through Pac*Bell that 2400 bps is the max
- > that carriers consider to be required to pass through a standard
- > dialup circuit. In other words, if you complain that the line quality
- > is poor enough to inhibit 2400 bps transmission, they will fix it. If
- > you complain that V.32 or PEP is having trouble, you may get waved
- > off. A totally unsubstantiated rumor states that the carriers are
- > doing this on purpose to get people to go for more expensive "data"
- > service.
-
- This is absolutely true at MCI. Even though Customer Service (and
- even the Trouble Reporting Centers) will take the report, as soon as
- the trouble "ticket" reaches the regional Data Support group, and they
- see it above 2400 baud, they bring out the corporate policy book and
- quote it, chapter and verse. When the customer says what should I do,
- then they 'recommend' a data line! ... to a dial-up customer! (Gee,
- let's see, a data line to all the computers I call, hmmm ... how much
- did you say!!!)
-
- The only exception is National Accounts, period. (i.e.: Boeing,
- Bechtel, Lockheed, etc...)
-
- > ...As far as MCI goes, don't bother. They haven't a clue.
-
- Oh, they have a clue. As a matter of fact, they know exactly what they're
- doing ... going after business accounts! Can't waste money on residental
- customers ... not a fast enough rate of return.
-
- You do know it takes three trouble reports entered in their customer
- service computer to generate a REAL trouble ticket, and those reports
- have to match each other ... otherwise, it's the bit bucket it goes
- to.
-
- Kinda funny in that when I worked there, I always used Sprint for my
- V.32 connections (9600 baud) when MCI couldn't even make it through an
- opening handshake. When I told their Data Support people that MCI's
- gotta be the worst for dial-up communcations, they said "Absolutely
- true!".
-
-
- Robert Gutierrez
- Office of Space Science and Applications,
- NASA Science Internet Project - Network Operations Center.
- Moffett Feild, California.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #369
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa22480;
- 21 May 90 8:48 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa15672;
- 21 May 90 7:14 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa28397;
- 21 May 90 6:10 CDT
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 5:45:04 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #370
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005210545.ab30152@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Mon, 21 May 90 05:44:30 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 370
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Cellular Buyers' Guide Wanted / New Cellular User [Steve Huff]
- AT&T International Calling [Ken Jongsma]
- ANI Failure Results in ONI [Larry Lippman]
- Area Code 809 DA from Canada [Linc Madison]
- Customized Telephone Numbers (Was NXX-0000) [David Tamkin]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Numbers [Ed Horch]
- Re: Public FAX Machine at Post Office [David Lesher]
- Re: Public FAX Machine at Post Office [Linc Madison]
- Re: Public FAX Machine at Post Office [Piet van Oostrum]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [David Tamkin]
- Re: Interesting Police Technology [Bill Cavanaugh]
- Re: Interesting Police Technology [Gary Bridgewater]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: "Steve Huff, U. of Kansas, Lawrence" <HUFF@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
- Subject: Cellular Buyers' Guide Wanted / New Cellular User
- Date: 20 May 90 10:46:16 CDT
- Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
-
-
- My roommates and I think we have justified buying a cellular phone.
- Due to our location (Lawrence) and where the three of us are from
- (Kansas City), a cellular call between the two cities is considered
- local. Based on our expensive long distance bills between the two
- cities, a cellular phone is almost a break-even deal. (We'll pay an
- extra $2 a month, but thats the comparitive price of technology :-) ).
-
- Two retail stores, Silo and Venture, are advertising a bare bones
- Novatel for $250, including the battery pack. This deal requires you
- to sign up with Cellular One, for a minimum of three months.
-
- What we would like to know is what features on cellular phones are
- considered necessary, nice, or worthless. Is the cheap Novatel a
- decent phone? Can a modem be hooked up to it (or any other cellular)?
- Basically, were looking for a cellular buyers' guide for people who
- are buying their first.
-
- I'll compile a list of suggestions and features, and post if no other
- buyers' guide is available.
-
- Thanks for your help.
-
-
- Steve Huff
- Internet: HUFF@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu EmCon: K1TR or KW02
- Bitnet: HUFF@ukanvax.BITNET
- UUNet: uunet!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!HUFF@uunet.UU.NET
- Snail: P.O. Box 1225, Lawrence, KS 66044-8225
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: AT&T International Calling
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 17:35:35 EDT
- From: Ken Jongsma <wybbs!ken@sharkey.cc.umich.edu>
-
-
- Having followed the recent discussions about whether or not you could
- call from one country to another billing to your AT&T card, with
- neither country being the US, I offer the following:
-
- >From an AT&T International Traveler Newsletter:
-
- Now, call anywhere in the world from the United Kingdom - with the
- AT&T Card! The AT&T Card now lets you call worldwide from the UK and
- have your calls billed directly to your AT&T Card.
-
- The new service is simple to use. When calling other countries from
- the UK, just dial the local international [almost an oxymoron, eh? - KJ]
- operator at 155. Give him or her your regular AT&T card number.
-
- Calls are billed by British Telecom International at BTTs current rate
- for operator assisted international calls. The costs of your calls are
- converted to US Currency on your AT&T bill. AT&T does not charge for
- this service.
-
- Note: Continue to use the USA Direct access number 0800-89-0011
- anytime you call the States from the UK.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: ANI Failure Results in ONI
- Date: 20 May 90 23:23:21 EDT (Sun)
- From: Larry Lippman <kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- In article <8011@accuvax.nwu.edu> wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (David
- Lesher) writes:
-
- > | There *is* a verification system of sorts which has been
- > |implemented to deter ONI "fibbing" :-).
-
- > (Larry goes on to describe a 'busy test' method)
- > One problem. Lots of ONI calls were/are on party lines. Give another
- > party's #....
-
- People who were inclined to, uh, "fib" generally would not do
- that for two reasons: (1) a subscriber usually would not know the full
- directory number of another party on their line since they cannot dial
- that number directly, but must instead use a single-digit revertive
- ringing code number; and (2) even if a dishonest subscriber knew the
- full directory number of another party on their line, I suspect they
- would not use it since it is "too close to home".
-
- > I'm not sure how this fits, but my friend JB once took a TT phone to
- > his (party line service) parent's in Avon, OH (216-937). In those
- > days, that was part of Lorain Telephone Co.
- > The TT set work fine on local calls, as the switch faithfully
- > outpulsed each tone's translation. (yawn) But when he made a LD call,
- > the intercept operator came up with a very puzzled note to her
- > 'nummberpleze' query. She asked him to call again. He did, with a
- > rotary set. She sounded relieved.
-
- > Any idea what was going on?
-
- This is pure speculation since I have no idea what type of CO
- apparatus or CAMA/toll ticketing apparatus serves the Lorain, OH area.
-
- However, I have a scenario which *exactly* explains the above
- observation. Assume that: (1) the party line was a two-party line;
- (2) the CO was equipped for ANI on two-party calls; (3) the particular
- subscriber line being used was the "tip party"; (4) the assignment for
- the "ring party" (i.e., no balanced ground) was vacant; and (5) the
- touch-tone telephone was not arranged for "tip party" ground.
-
- The ANI apparatus (or ESS or whatever) is unable to ANI the
- calling party because there is no valid "ring party" for the CO line
- equipment assigned to this subscriber. Therefore, the CAMA (or other)
- apparatus hiccups and routes the call to ONI with a *trouble flag*
- indicating that ANI failed. This is why the ONI operator sounded
- puzzled.
-
- The above scenario assumes: (1) intelligent ANI; (2)
- intelligent toll tandem office; and (3) TSPS or an intelligent ONI
- position.
-
- As an example (I have to pick something specific), if this
- were a WECO SxS office equipped with ANI-C or ANI-D, there is an
- explicit wiring option for two-party lines where only *one* party is
- assigned. If the assigned party is the "tip party" and a "ring party"
- is detected, the MF outpulser would automatically send the code for
- ONI intercept with a trouble flag. This is contained in "information
- digit" sent immediately following the KP signal. For those into
- arcane details, the identification digit is "0" for normal ANI, "1"
- for normal ONI, and "2" for ONI with ANI failure.
-
- So, the point is, if this happened in a WECO office with ANI-C
- or ANI-D where the ONI was handled by TSPS, the TSPS operator would
- known that an ANI failure had occurred. For older CAMA installations
- where dedicated ONI operator positions were employed, I don't know
- whether or not the ONI operator received an ANI failure indication.
-
-
- Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. "Have you hugged your cat today?"
- {boulder||decvax||rutgers||watmath}!acsu.buffalo.edu!kitty!larry
- VOICE: 716/688-1231 || FAX: 716/741-9635 {utzoo||uunet}!/ \aerion!larry
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 01:19:50 PDT
- From: Linc Madison <rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Area Code 809 DA from Canada
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- Why are calls to 809-555-1212 blocked from Canada? Seems rather strange.
-
-
- Linc Madison = rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 18:29 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Customized Telephone Numbers (Was NXX-0000)
-
-
- Patrick Townson comments in volume 10, issue 365, about requesting
- custom telephone numbers:
-
- |[Moderator's Note: I do my own 'homework' and find out what desirable
- |numbers are idle. I make the list of ten or so numbers, then call the
- |Business Office. I ask, "Can I have such and such?" The rep checks and
- |almost every time says okay. And there is no special ongoing monthly fee
- |for the number, either. PT]
-
- On the three occasions to which I referred when I said that IBT and
- Centel had offered me a short list to choose from, I had not requested
- any *specific* number but merely the chance to make my own selection.
-
- However, in 1984 a friend and I were setting up a BBS, and we did the
- very homework of which Patrick speaks. We finally came up with three
- numbers to ask for. Everyone at Illinois Bell simply repeated
- unyieldingly that each of those numbers was somehow reserved or
- unavailable, and yes, they acknowledged that they were not currently
- in use, but tough luck. (One of the inexplicably denied numbers I
- still remember: 312-BOREDOM. 312-GODDAMN already belonged to a VFW
- post.)
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Ed Horch <argon!ebh@pyrnj.pyramid.com>
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Numbers
- Date: 20 May 90 18:18:07 GMT
- Reply-To: Ed Horch <argon!ebh@pyrnj.pyramid.com>
- Organization: Lightspace Designs, Highland Park, NJ
-
-
- >I'm going to be moving soon, and I'm considering getting a phone
- >number ending in -0000 at my new residence.
-
- One more caveat. My number is NXX-0008. I get lots of wrong numbers
- from people dialing NXX-008?, due to TT keypad bounce. I suspect the
- problem gets worse the more repeated digits you have.
-
- BTW, this is another argument against the odious practice some TT sets
- have with generating specific tone envelopes no matter how long the
- keys are pressed. In most cases of key bounce, the key bounces for so
- short a time that the CO wouldn't treat it as two separate key-
- presses. However, if the set is doing the timing, it will often
- artificially hold the key "up" long enough (45ms?) to generate two
- distinct digits.
-
-
- Ed
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: Re: Public FAX Machine at Post Office
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 13:59:49 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
-
- PT remarks on a unprotected public phone on a FAX machine.
-
- Over the years, I've seen several such. American Express had a cash
- machine at Detroit airport. It had a handy Slime-line (tm) Customer
- Service phone hanging next to it. The sign said
-
- 'pick up phone, push button {next to phone}
- to reach Customer Service'
-
- And you guessed it - the TT pad on the phone still worked. If I
- had known the number, I would have called the IBT newsline. ;-}
-
- At the office in the 'Quads', the general aviation area @ Cleveland
- Hopkins, the desk had two phones - a restricted airport one and an
- outside one. The employee carefully locked the latter in his desk, BUT
- the RJ-11's were on the back of his desk, just waiting to be swapped.
-
-
- A host is a host from coast to coast.....wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu
- & no one will talk to a host that's close............(305) 255-RTFM
- Unless the host (that isn't close)......................pob 570-335
- is busy, hung or dead....................................33257-0335
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 01:42:14 PDT
- From: Linc Madison <rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: Public FAX Machine at Post Office
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- In article <8014@accuvax.nwu.edu> Henry Mensch writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 368, Message 9 of 9
-
- >Australia Post has provided a similar service for some time ...
-
- Well, the places I've seen it (Australia and Greece), you handed your
- fax document to a postal employee. Do they have *unattended* fax
- machines?
-
-
- Linc Madison = rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Piet van Oostrum <piet@cs.ruu.nl>
- Subject: Re: Public FAX Machine at Post Office
- Date: 21 May 90 11:19:03 GMT
- Reply-To: Piet van Oostrum <piet@cs.ruu.nl>
- Organization: Dept of Computer Science, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
-
-
- In-Reply-To: henry@garp.mit.edu (Henry Mensch)
-
- The Dutch PTT recently also introduced a public Fax service. It costs
- Dfl 2.50 (a little bit more that $1) per page. Only for domestic
- calls. You cannot receive, only send.
-
- Piet van Oostrum <piet@cs.ruu.nl>
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 18:25 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
-
-
- John Higdon wrote in volume 10, issue 366:
-
- |Connections to my southern California neighbors are carried by AT&T, who
- |uses PacNet, Pacific Bell's statewide fiber optic network.
-
- PacNet is also the name of the packet-switching network that provides
- data connections to Guam and the Northern Marianas. It is not
- affiliated with Pac*Bell nor Pacific Telesis.
-
- Just what the field needs: more confusion.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Bill Cavanaugh <tronsbox!bleys@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Interesting Police Technology
- Date: 21 May 90 06:00:12 GMT
-
-
- >[Moderator's Note: In Chicago, a limited number of police cars have
- >been equipped with terminals for several years; the number of cars
- >thus equipped is growing, it may be up to 25 percent now.
-
- I remember seeing this technology in the fictional Chicago of the
- Blues Brothers movie, and being impressed. I thought that it was just
- in the movies!
-
-
- Bill Cavanaugh uunet!tronsbox!bleys
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Gary Bridgewater <gary@dgcad.sv.dg.com>
- Subject: Re: Interesting Police Technology
- Date: 21 May 90 06:10:22 GMT
- Reply-To: gary@proa.sv.dg.com
- Organization: Data General SDD, Sunnyvale, CA
-
-
- In article <8009@accuvax.nwu.edu> douglas@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Douglas
- Mason) writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 368, Message 4 of 9
-
- >Something interesting that the police in Ottawa County (Holland,
- >Michigan) are doing now is putting cellular phones and fax machines in
- >their police cars!
-
- >[Moderator's Note: In Chicago, a limited number of police cars have
- >been equipped with terminals for several years; the number of cars
- >thus equipped is growing, it may be up to 25 percent now. These
- >terminals can do license plate checks as well as get records from the
- >NCIC, a federal data base of criminals. For the rest of the police
- >cars, the officers have to call in their request, and wait 5-20
- >minutes for a response, depending. While the police radios transmit
- >in the 460.05 ==> 460.500 range, the terminals are up around 812 megs
- >someplace. PT]
-
- Arapahoe County in Colorado had this system ten years ago. (I taught
- a course for their systems people) Their absolutely favorite part of
- the system - based on radio modems - was that it was unmonitorable.
-
- They staged a very big drug raid and the dealers - surrounded by all
- manner of scanners, monitors, stolen police radios, etc. were caught
- totally by surprise since the whole thing was coordinated via
- terminals.
-
- The modems, as I recall, used two FM bands simultaneously to further
- foil people who might (eventually) have stolen terminals.
-
- The computer system setup was an interesting exercise in hot backup.
- There were three CPUs - one hot, one warm and one being serviced, used
- by programmers for testing, etc. There were three sets of disk drives
- each dual ported to two of the systems. The warm system got all the
- hot system traffic and kept its disk up-to-date so if the hot system's
- disk died the warm system's disk was available. The hot system could
- also feed the test system's disk so the test system could monitor the
- activity and run new software against it. All were on UPS with motor
- generators available.
-
-
- Gary Bridgewater, Data General Corporation,
- Sunnyvale California gary@sv.dg.com or {amdahl,aeras,amdcad}!dgcad!gary
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #370
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa25563;
- 21 May 90 9:59 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa00833;
- 21 May 90 8:18 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab15672;
- 21 May 90 7:15 CDT
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 6:31:09 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #371
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005210631.ab16902@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Mon, 21 May 90 06:30:40 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 371
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media [John Higdon]
- Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media [Joel Yossi]
- Re: 950 Numbers in Canada [Ravinder Bhumbla]
- Re: 950 Numbers in Canada [Linc Madison]
- Re: Distributed TELCO [David Tamkin]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [John Higdon]
- Re: FCC REN Numbers (Was: BT Phones, etc) [Stephen J. Friedl]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Linc Madison]
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [Joe Stong]
- Starline and CLASS Not Compatible [TELECOM Moderator]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media
- Date: 20 May 90 21:51:55 PDT (Sun)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- "j. eric townsend" <jet@karazm.math.uh.edu> writes:
-
- > I challenge you to show me a newspaper editorial that suggests
- > suspending the constitution to solve any of our current problems.
-
- How many issues of the "San Jose Mercury" would you like that have
- editorials that say something to the effect, "While it may seem
- extreme to [walk all over this particular constitutional guarantee]
- but the problems caused by [the current societal affront of the day]
- require drastic solutions"? "Serious problems" include: computer
- hacking, drugs, street crime, terrorism, and abortion. Unlike the the
- Digest, I use old newspapers for the cat box and don't have them
- available to send to you. (The rest of them go to the recycler.)
-
- > Uh, if you think you can get (and trust) your information from only
- > one source, you should rethink your belief system. I read the NYT on
- > a regular basis, but I don't automagically believe everything (or
- > anything) I read there.
-
- Never, ever think that I trust anything I read anywhere. Every source
- of information has its noise level. But unfortunately, even when you
- filter out the noise, there isn't very much useful "signal" left in
- your average newspaper or radio or TV news report. Mentioning the
- Digest as a source of information is not to imply that everything
- herein is accurate; quite the contrary. But after you strip off the
- garbage, there is a considerable amount of useful information left
- over.
-
- > 2600 is a low-rent journal for techies (which isn't bad, it's just the
- > part of the world they occupy).
-
- Frankly, I've never read 2600, other than the article transmitted this
- weekend.
-
- > Finally, if you think it's so easy, give it a try yourself. :-).
- > There are plenty of papers that'd love to pay you about $25,000/yr for
- > you to relate your knowledge gained at a much higher expense.
-
- I have written many, many articles for small publications and trade
- magazines (some have even been printed :-). In some cases the pay was
- really poor ($0). But that's beside the point. We are not living in
- the 1950's anymore. Technology is a way of life and the sooner the
- majority of the population becomes technically literate, the better
- off we will be. Law enforcement won't have to chase boogeymen, judges
- won't have to rule from total bewilderment, and the average person
- won't have to be intimidated when the telco rep asks all those
- embarrasing questions.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Yossi (Joel" <joel%TECHUNIX.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media
- Date: 21 May 90 09:57:56 GMT
- Reply-To: "Yossi (Joel" <joel%TECHUNIX.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu>
- Organization: Technion, Israel Inst. Tech., Haifa Israel
-
-
- In article <8008@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com>
- writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 368, Message 3 of 9
-
- >Think of the last story you read in the newspaper concerning any
- >technological matter. Was it complete, or was it simplified to the
- >point that little useful information was available? What information
- >there was, was it accurate, misleading, or downright erroneous?
-
- Actually, anyone who has first-hand knowledge about >any< article in
- the newspapers knows how inaccurate the reporting can be. When I see
- something in the Times, say, I generally assume it's accurate, in
- spite of the fact that whenever I've read about anything about which I
- have first hand knowledge, I've found dozens of errors. It's not just
- technology they can't quite get right....
-
-
- Joel
- (joel@techunix.technion.ac.il -or- joel@techunix.BITNET)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Ravinder Bhumbla <am299bv%sdcc6@ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: 950 Numbers in Canada
- Date: 21 May 90 05:21:33 GMT
- Organization: University of California, San Diego
-
-
- In article <8026@accuvax.nwu.edu> 0004261818@mcimail.com (David
- Tamkin) writes:
-
- >US Sprint no longer uses a 950 number but has switched to 800.
- >Telecom*USA never did use 950, and I believe AT&T never did either.
- >(Actually, I have no idea how to place a call through AT&T from a
- >phone where 10288 is blocked.)
-
- That is a problem I have also come across recently. I have an
- office phone which can be used to make only local and 800- calls. I
- want to use my AT&T calling card, especially on weekends when it costs
- the same as calling from home when you have a Reach Out America plan.
- I wonder if someone can suggest a way to do this. The AT&T operator
- told me that there was no way to get around this problem. :-(
-
- I am managing at present by using the US Sprint/WD-40 card as
- the Sprint FONCARD calls are dialled using an 800 number.
-
-
- Ravinder Bhumbla rbhumbla@ucsd.edu Office Phone: (619)534-7894
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 01:54:41 PDT
- From: Linc Madison <rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: 950 Numbers in Canada
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- David Tamkin discussed how to get an MCI card for a subscriber in
- Canada, without worrying about having the "co-conspirator" in the US
- involuntarily switched to MCI 1+ service. There's a very simple
- method that I used when I requested my MCI card-only account: as the
- contact phone, I gave them the BOC payphone in the hall. I very
- carefully pointed out to them, "this number is a payphone, it's not
- mine, I can't bill to it, but you can generally reach me there during
- reasonable hours." So, for example, if your "co-conspirator" has a
- payphone at work, it's an ideal "contact number" for a card-only
- account.
-
- (Of course, if it happens to be a COCOT and it gets involuntarily
- switched to MCI service, so much the better ... ;-] )
-
-
- Linc Madison = rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 00:15 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: Distributed TELCO
-
-
- Joe Stong <jst@cca.ucsf.edu> wrote in volume 10, issue 366:
-
- |Upon picking up a telephone for the first time after connecting up the
- |system, the phone says, your telephone number is 412346,234457 please
- |enter the names for your directory listing. You key the name that will
- |list you in the electronic directory.
-
- Someone has to administer the directory. Someone has to make sure
- that the voice is there to ask you for your listing information.
- Someone has to make sure that it doesn't ask again unless you
- specifically want to change your listing.
-
- |Your box would cooperatively switch the datastream from other conversa-
- |tions on to their eventual destination. Your box would participate in
- |the systemwide directory keeping. Your box, upon coming on line, would
- |determine which sites it was between, to determine your pseudo-latitude-
- |longitude "telephone number".
-
- Someone has to maintain and update the routing tables. Someone,
- again, has to administer the directory. Someone has to force the
- uncooperative to let other calls be routed through their boxes.
-
- |What does it achieve? The elimination of a local TELCO. The elimination
- |of local phone bills.
-
- How? It replaces telcos as we now know them with something else,
- something else that must be paid for. There's still a bill to pay;
- all you've done is change the telco bill to a bill by some other name.
-
- |The system is cooperative, and self maintaining.
-
- Self-maintaining? It neither heals like a live organism if damaged
- nor keeps its own users in line if they decide to cause problems.
- Pardon my skepticism, Mr. Stong. You couldn't possibly have meant it
- the way it sounds. Hardware cannot maintain itself; there needs to be
- a staff of repair personnel, and they need tools and supplies.
- Hardware certainly cannot discipline its users into keeping the
- cooperative's rules. Repair and administration cost money, so there
- is still a bill to pay.
-
- |The software on the silicon in the eyeball box itself would be designed
- |to function without any centralized management, doing location deter-
- |mination and routing by itself, like Usenet or Internet without the
- |administrators.
-
- But who updates its databases (or the central database from which the
- eyeball box downloads its own copies of the updates)? Who installs
- upgrades to the software itself?
-
- Maybe you and your friends have already covered many of these
- questions -- they certainly sprang to my mind pretty quickly -- and
- you left the answers out of your Telecom submission to save space?
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 20 May 90 22:08:01 PDT (Sun)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Robert Gutierrez <ranma@calvin.arc.nasa.gov> writes:
-
- > Kinda funny in that when I worked there, I always used Sprint for my
- > V.32 connections (9600 baud) when MCI couldn't even make it through an
- > opening handshake. When I told their Data Support people that MCI's
- > gotta be the worst for dial-up communcations, they said "Absolutely
- > true!".
-
- Last year sometime, one of my UUCP neighbors did some informal tests
- on the various carriers using PEP. AT&T and Sprint came off with the
- fastest throughput (with Sprint having a slight edge--could have been
- a statistical aberation) with all the other carriers significantly
- poorer. If memory serves, MCI was just a little better than half the
- speed of AT&T (if the modems could train in the first place). This
- would mean that to be cost-effective, MCI rates would have to be half
- those of AT&T.
-
- As far as I am concerned, MCI is not a real player for serious long
- distance users. While they may have lots of "suits" running around
- schmoozing it up to their corporate customers, the service they
- provide is substandard to either Sprint or AT&T by an amount far
- exceeding any discount they provide.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 03:49:35 -0400
- From: mtndew!friedl@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: Re: FCC REN Numbers (Was: BT Phones, etc)
-
-
- Julian Macassey writes about RENs (Ringer Equivalence Numbers),
- quoting chapter and verse from FCC part 68 rules. This comes at a
- fortuitous time because I was just wondering about it myself.
-
- Why do the RENs vary? I have noticed quite a wide range of ringer
- equivalences, and while thinking about this I came up with a bunch of
- statements that a telephone designer might make about them. Which of
- these are true or likely and which are false?
-
- "physical bells take 1.0 REN, that's just the way it is"
-
- "it's harder to make the ringer circuit with lower RENs"
-
- "lower REN is better because you can get more instruments
- on a line"
-
- "we didn't really think about the REN when we built the
- phone, that's just what it ended up being"
-
- "the phone switch likes higher REN phones better"
-
- "we always built phones with REN=xx and saw no reason to change"
-
- "if the REN is too low, it will trigger sporadically (say,
- via pulse dialing on another extension"
-
- "off-the-shelf phone line interfaces have REN=xx so that's
- why we used it".
-
- Should one even bother to look at the REN when buying a phone?
-
-
- Thanks,
- Steve
-
- Stephen J. Friedl, KA8CMY / Software Consultant / Tustin, CA / 3B2-kind-of-guy
- +1 714 544 6561 voice / friedl@vsi.com / {uunet,attmail}!mtndew!friedl
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 00:54:45 PDT
- From: Linc Madison <rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- In article <7897@accuvax.nwu.edu> you write:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 360, Message 1 of 11
-
- >danj1@ihlpa.att.com (Daniel Jacobson) writes:
-
- >>[Isn't it dumb that you can't dial 1-NPA-Number for local calls,
- >> 'cause maybe you've got your phone programmed with some numbers
- >> and then you take the phone to a place local to some of them.]
-
- >The dumb one is the phone (or dialing software, which I use). It
- >should allow you to enter a "local" area code and automatically delete
- >them from local calls. Silly, in an age where portability (as in
- >laptops with built-in modems) is all the rage.
-
- But that doesn't work. What if you're in Tyler, Texas? It's in A/C
- 214 with Dallas (soon to be split off into 903, but the point will
- remain for locations like Longview and Texarkana). To dial long
- distance numbers within the same area code, you MUST dial
- 1-214-Number, even though it's the same area code. Dialing just the 7
- digits gets an intercept telling you that you must dial a 1 or 0 and
- the area code to complete this call.
-
- Your system will say, "oh, that's the same area code as what's 'local'
- so I don't dial the area code." The only way to actually distinguish
- the cases is to have a complete database of the local prefixes. There
- are also other special cases that no programmer would bother to
- anticipate (and indeed could not have anticipated more than a year or
- two ago) like "Metro" dialing in Dallas/Fort Worth -- to reach a
- number in the other area code, you must dial NPA-NXX-XXXX *WITHOUT* a
- "1". Dialing "1+" to a local number in the other area code gets an
- intercept that "Dialing 1 is not required on this call."
-
- The long and the short of it is that there is no practical way to do
- what you are suggesting, short of maintaining an up-to-the-minute
- database of telephone prefixes and dialing rules among them.
-
-
- Linc Madison = rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 01:19:11 -0700
- From: Joe Stong <jst@cca.ucsf.edu>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
-
-
- By the way, beware: ordinary "quad wire" IS NOT twisted pairs. It is
- much more prone to picking up electrical noise than real twisted
- pairs.
-
- In my old apartment, wired with quad wire, I could hear my modem on
- the voice line that shared the same piece of quad wire.
-
- I've seen wire in buildings with as few as three twisted pairs, but
- nothing smaller.
-
- I had a bit of grief with a leased line that was wired inside the
- building with quad wire. Much noise went away in doing the inside
- wiring with twisted pairs. It was in a tire re-treading plant,
- complete with huge compressors and electric ovens.
-
-
- Joe Stong jst@cca.ucsf.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 6:18:50 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Starline and CLASS Not Compatible
-
-
- I had been planning to order one or more of the CLASS features for my
- lines when they became available in my CO this month and next. We will
- be getting the usual fare: Distinctive Ringing, Call Screening,
- Redial, Return Last Call, and others.
-
- I was advised by two service representatives at Illinois Bell that the
- CLASS features will not work for subscribers who have Starline, a
- residential version of Centrex.
-
- The problem seems to be the assignment of feature codes: *8 is used by
- Starline to place calls on hold. *8X is used by CLASS to turn off
- certain features. Why didn't anyone think of that when this software
- was being written?
-
- So my choice now is to give up Starline and install the CLASS features
- of my choice, or do without CLASS. But the conflict with *8 should
- only cause problems for two features: the one where you add selected
- numbers to be screened or blocked, and the one where you add numbers
- to a directory which are to be given special identifying rings when
- the call comes in. Yet Bell says Distinctive Ringing (two or three CO
- numbers camped on the same line) won't work either. Any ideas why?
-
-
- PT
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #371
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa17230;
- 22 May 90 3:22 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa21317;
- 22 May 90 1:26 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa09459;
- 22 May 90 0:22 CDT
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 23:59:48 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #372
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005212359.ab29199@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Mon, 21 May 90 23:59:25 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 372
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Distributed TELCO [Karl Denninger]
- Re: Distributed TELCO [Brandon S. Allbery]
- Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media [J. Eric Townsend]
- Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media [Steve Wolfson]
- Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media [Tom Neff]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Alan Millar]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Peter Desnoyers]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [John Higdon]
- Re: Deep Discounts on LD Calls [Peter da Silva]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Karl Denninger <karl@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: Distributed TELCO
- Reply-To: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.mcs.com>
- Organization: MCSNet - Wheeling, IL
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 14:12:04 GMT
-
-
- In article <7986@accuvax.nwu.edu> jst@cca.ucsf.edu (Joe Stong) writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 366, Message 5 of 9
-
- >before having to buy another box. Between boxes, the data rate would
- >be 100Mbaud. The two coax line downlink into the house would be about
- >11Mbaud, with the $30 "phone jacks" being little more than shift
- >registers and D-A and A-D converters to pick off signals from the
- >synchronous coax lines.
-
- >What does it achieve? The elimination of a local TELCO. The
- >elimination of a tree structure of wiring, replacing it with a large
- >redundant grid. The elimination of local phone bills. Indeed, many
- >"eyeballs" at the edge of town might end up being pointed at a
- >long-distance carrier system, though some would go to longer pieces of
- >repeatered fiber to rural subscribers.
-
- I like this a LOT.
-
- Let's build a few. Show 'em working, then mass produce the suckers.
- Drive these people called "Ma Bell" right out of business in the
- cities. With some work you can do the same in the rural areas too.
-
- I bet a >lot< of people would pay $400 or so, once, to have these
- boxes. No more phone bills. No more telco. No more hassles.
-
- Redundancy is a key point. Any one box going out of service won't
- affect routing much at all.
-
- Focused "eyes" are another key point of the system. However, I'd like
- to add one feature -- one "roaming" eye that looks for a pilot carrier
- in a 360 degree arc. If it finds one, it plays "radar" to find out
- whether or not it's closer than what you're linked with now -- and if
- so, suggests to the owner that he/she realign the other eyes for
- better performance.
-
- I bet the government wouldn't like this one little bit. There's some
- evidence that the present "raid the system" mentality has more than a
- little to do with the closely-knit information net we take for
- granted; the ability to get messages from one coast to the other in
- minutes is VERY powerful. And when one considers that you could build
- in encryption hardware, conversations have the potential to be TRULY
- private.
-
- I could handle some of the embedded software; any hardware hackers out
- there want to tackle this? Infrared LED is probably the best idea for
- short distances; the problem with Microwave is that it requires a
- license, and I bet you'll have trouble getting one from the FCC when
- they figure out what you're up to (and they will -- fast!)
-
-
- Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl)
- Public Access Data Line: [+1 708 808-7300], Voice: [+1 708 808-7200]
- Macro Computer Solutions, Inc. "Quality Solutions at a Fair Price"
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 22:54:30 -0400
- From: "Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR" <allbery@ncoast.org>
- Subject: Re: Distributed TELCO
- Organization: North Coast Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, OH
-
-
- In article <7986@accuvax.nwu.edu> ["Distributed TELCO"], jst@cca.ucsf.
- edu wrote:
-
- [description of distributed telephone setup with repeaters]
-
- Your idea isn't all that new; packet radio ham operators with
- digipeaters are probably doing the same thing within a mile of you,
- only it's digital. However, digital voice packet radio is under
- development, and chances are that you've even got *that* nearby if
- it's in use anywhere... It is as yet slow, but that's a matter of FCC
- regulations and bandwidth restrictions. With microwaves to play with
- and commercial interest, it's all but current technology.
-
- I bet the RBOC's don't want to hear about it, though....
-
-
- Me: Brandon S. Allbery VHF: KB8JRR on 224.50 (Lake County, OH)
- Internet: allbery@NCoast.ORG Delphi: ALLBERY
- uunet!cwjcc.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery America OnLine: BrandonA or KB8JRR
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 19:26:25 CDT
- From: "j. eric townsend" <jet@karazm.math.uh.edu>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media
- Organization: University of Houston -- Department of Mathematics
-
-
- john@bovine.ati.com wrote:
-
- >"j. eric townsend" <jet@karazm.math.uh.edu> writes:
- >> Finally, if you think it's so easy, give it a try yourself. :-).
- >> There are plenty of papers that'd love to pay you about $25,000/yr for
- >> you to relate your knowledge gained at a much higher expense.
-
- >I have written many, many articles for small publications and trade
- >magazines (some have even been printed :-). In some cases the pay was
- >really poor ($0). But that's beside the point.
-
- No, that's the point exactly. Until the media can afford (or decides
- to afford, in the case of broadcast) to hire technical people capable
- of explaining technology in simple terms, with no buzzwords, the
- masses will not be technically literate (unless they learn it on their
- own).
-
- The masses derive most of their knowledge from the media
- (unfortunately :-). Issues such as computer security are not
- complicated. Thanks to the media, however, I've met several people
- who *should* know better (including CS profs) who think that the RKM
- Internet Worm could have attacked *any* machine on the Internet,
- whether it be a PDP-11, a Sun4/60, or a 386 box.
-
- Some of this is the fault of the story contacts as well. If you are
- asked to give an interview on say, PBX security, offer to review the
- reporter's story before they submit it. Say something like: "I
- understand this PBX stuff is a little tricky because it's so new, and
- I was wondering if you'd like me to go over your final copy before you
- submit it so that we can be sure that the PBX-related facts are
- correct." (When I did stories on molecular biology, something I know
- virtually nothing about, I asked the subject if they would look over
- my story to make sure I'd gotten it right.)
-
- Another tip: don't give reporters product info handouts when they ask
- for information about a certain piece of equipment. *I* can't figure
- out some of the ones related to equipment I want to purchase, so how
- can a non-techie be expected to comprehend any of it. (Remember the
- number of "Cray on a chip" stories when the i860 was announced? Who
- out there has gotten cray performance from any i860 system? :-)
-
-
- J. Eric Townsend -- University of Houston Dept. of Mathematics (713) 749-2120
- Internet: jet@uh.edu
- Bitnet: jet@UHOU "If your neighbor doesn't want it,
- Skate UNIX(r). there won't be any peace." -- Russian proverb
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Steve Wolfson <motcid!wolfson@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media
- Date: 21 May 90 15:15:25 GMT
- Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Div., Arlington Hgts, IL
-
-
- jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (j. eric townsend) writes:
-
- >In article <8008@accuvax.nwu.edu> it was written:
-
- >Technical stories do not sell newspapers, unfortunately. In more than
- >one of my journalism classes, we discussed how technical an article
- >can get before people stop reading it.
-
- >The biggest problem: A news story has to explain enough background so
- >that the story will make sense to people who don't understand what a
- >PBX is, or why password security is flaky, etc.
-
- Problems in reporting technology impact has certainly been
- going on a long time. About 8-10 years ago a couple high school
- students from Palatine "hacked" their way on to a timeshare system of
- DePaul university. The {Chicago Reader} did a front page article on
- this incredibly clever act. The Reader reporter interviewed me since
- I was in charge of a similar system at Harper College, and we were
- leasing time to the high school district that the break-in artists
- came from. He was not at all interested in learning about the fact
- that these guys broke in more by luck, and stupidity on the part of
- the managers of DePaul's time share system. He was more interested in
- the people aspects, motivations etc. So I suspect that some reporters
- could care less about being technically accurate since it could ruin
- their story.
-
- What did these early hackers do? The system was a Hewlett Packard
- HP-2000. It ran time share Basic, which had alot of extended features
- that were the equivalent of system calls, the ability to do shared
- read/write disk access and a number of other features. These features
- were known to have bugs that could be used to do some things the
- designers never intended. Unfortunately our would-be hackers were
- never even that clever to use these security holes. What they did is
- very simple.
-
- The HP-2000 had the equivalent of a root account, though it wasn't
- quite as powerful as the UNIX root. The HP-2000 also used timed
- access for logins, it allowed you to login any number of times up to
- the time out limit. Security was provided by a one to six character
- password. DePaul had two flaws, first, they had their logins set to
- the maximum timeout of 255 seconds, second DePaul was known to have
- created all of their passwords set to be 3 control characters followed
- by three non-control characters (sort of cuts down on the
- permutations).
-
- So our clever "hackers" broke in by dialing up with their Commodore
- and trusty 300 baud modem. Then they had software that went AAA, AAB
- etc. until they found the password. They then managed to break into
- the rest of the system since DePaul's system managers left a straight
- ascii file with the accounts and passwords for the rest system on the
- root account. One of these clever programmers got caught by sending
- threats to the system console, demanding a piece of public domain s/w.
- Harper had protected itself against this type of attack by a login
- program written by a friend of mine that allowed three login tries
- before kicking you off the system and logging illegal attempts, it
- also locked out logins after a set number of evictions. This was
- easily accomplished by setting the system passwords to null. The
- system always went through a HELLO program and the Harper Password
- checker was written using this feature. The root account maintained
- both types of passwords in case of failure by the local software. All
- of our passwords were encrypted.
-
- This system also had (3780?) RJE capability to the mainframe and at
- the time they were worried that they might have gotten in to change
- grades on the IBM (they couldn't even log in to an IBM let alone hack
- it.).
-
-
- Stephen Wolfson E-Mail: ...!uunet!motcid!wolfsons
- Motorola Cellular or
- 1501 W. Shure Dr. IL27-1155 wolfson@mot.com
- Arlington Heights, IL
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Tom Neff <tneff%bfmny0@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media
- Date: 21 May 90 03:26:21 GMT
- Reply-To: Tom Neff <tneff%bfmny0@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- In article <8008@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@zygot.ati.com> writes:
-
- >Think of the last story you read in the newspaper concerning any
- >technological matter. Was it complete, or was it simplified to the
- >point that little useful information was available? What information
- >there was, was it accurate, misleading, or downright erroneous?
-
- This is true about EVERYTHING, not just technology. No matter what
- the subject is, if you are an expert and you read the newspaper you
- groan. Newspapers ALWAYS get the details wrong, because it's
- impossible to be infallible in fifty things at once, on deadline, at
- reporters' pay.
-
- It's worth remembering this when reading articles about subjects we're
- NOT experts in. That sidebar on trade negotiations in Singapore has
- just as many gaffes per column inch as the feature on fiber optics.
- However to most of us technology nuts the Singapore errors are
- acceptable because it's enough to know the general outline of what's
- going on. Well, hard as it is to swallow, the same thing's true for
- others about tech stuff!
-
- Sure, I cringe when AP gets an orbit backwards or misidentifies a
- computer I work with, but that doesn't mean that the overall job
- journalists are doing is a failure. It just means that the responsible
- way to read the news is to look for the "big picture" and reserve
- judgment on the details for later.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: ames!ames!claris!portal!cup.portal.com!AMillar@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: Mon, 21-May-90 08:22:57 PDT
-
-
- On Telebit modems not working through Sprint and/or MCI:
-
- I used to work for a company called Granger Associates (before it got
- sucked under by DSC, but that's another story :-)
-
- One of their "big" products was ADPCM T-1 multiplexers, which they
- sold to the long-distance carriers for equal-access expansion. With
- this ADPCM multiplexer, they could squeeze 44 voice channels out of a
- T-1 circuit, instead of just 23.
-
- While not affecting voice very much, it really killed modem traffic.
-
- I don't know if this is thr problem affecting you, but many
- "improvements" for voice never take into account modem traffic.
-
-
- Alan Millar AMillar@cup.portal.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Peter Desnoyers <codex!peterd@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 21 May 90 14:37:29 GMT
- Organization: Codex Corp., Canton MA
-
-
- claris!netcom!mcmahan@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Dave Mc Mahan) writes:
-
- >In article <7918@accuvax.nwu.edu> johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us
- >(John R. Levine) writes:
-
- >>Until recently, I was using Sprint quite
- >>sucessfully. I gather that Sprint has installed a bunch of new echo
- >>suppressors which are misconfigured in a way that clobbers a Telebit,
- >>in any event my uucp throughput in PEP mode recently dropped from 850
- >>cps to 210.
-
- >It's not Sprint or MCI, it's the Telebit. From my understanding,
- >Telebit modems don't work worth squat when the signal is digitized.
- >Seems that the digitizing screws up the phasing of the modem signal
- >(why? I don't know)
-
- Actually, the Telebit modulation scheme seems to be designed to be
- carried over digital lines - hence the 8kHz sampling rate. What could
- possibly screw it up is ADPCM encoding, which encodes audio at
- 32kbit/sec instead of 64kbit/sec. It's obviously a lot harder to
- squeeze 10-15kbit/sec out of a line with a total capacity (before
- analog loop impairments, etc.) of 32kbit/sec instead of 64.
-
- I don't know whether ADPCM is used by any US long-distance carriers,
- however. (It certainly gets used in private networks, though.)
-
- Peter Desnoyers
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 21 May 90 11:57:37 PDT (Mon)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com> writes:
-
- > PacNet is also the name of the packet-switching network that provides
- > data connections to Guam and the Northern Marianas. It is not
- > affiliated with Pac*Bell nor Pacific Telesis.
-
- Not to be argumentative, but AT&T *does* use Pac*Bell's fiber optic
- network in California, AND Pac*Bell employees that I have talked to
- always refer to it as "PacNet". If there is a *real* PacNet, then I am
- unaware of it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 11:52 CDT
- Subject: Re: Deep Discounts on LD Calls
- From: Peter da Silva <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
- Reply-to: Peter da Silva <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
- Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
-
-
- What's the 800 number for the AT&T credit card again?
-
-
- `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
- 'U` Have you hugged your wolf today? <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
- @FIN Dirty words: Zhghnyyl erphefvir vayvar shapgvbaf.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #372
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa18264;
- 22 May 90 4:00 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa15608;
- 22 May 90 2:30 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab21317;
- 22 May 90 1:26 CDT
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 0:47:21 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #373
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005220047.ab16258@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Tue, 22 May 90 00:47:01 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 373
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Measured Service [Carol Springs]
- Re: Measured Service [Lang Zerner]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [John Higdon]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [Dana H. Myers]
- Re: Customized Telephone Numbers (Was NXX-0000) [Bob Clements]
- Re: Line Slip [Peter da Silva]
- Re: Non-Cellular Mobile Phones [David Barts]
- Re: Articles in 2600 Magazine [Julian Macassey]
- Re: Starline and CLASS Not Compatible [John Higdon]
- Re: AT&T Software Defined Network [Paul Flynn]
- Data Access Lines [Jeremy Grodberg]
- System 85 Components [Mike Bunnell]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Carol Springs <#axiom!carols@drilex.dri.mgh.com>
- Subject: Re: Measured Service
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 10:21:09 EDT
-
-
- Jonathan A. Solomon writes in Vol. 10, Issue 367, about wanting
- definitive quotes from PUC regulations regarding whether he's allowed
- to have a measured service line in addition to his flat rate line.
- New England Telephone has been telling him that he can't; i.e., that
- the second line has to be flat rate as well.
-
- I have asked New England Telephone in the past for copies of these
- regulations, without result. However, I have been assured by the
- Massachusetts Public Utilities Department that there are indeed
- regulations specifying that customers here can't have it both ways
- within one household. The rationale seems to be that measured service
- in Massachusetts exists as a lifeline service for those who can't pay
- the higher phone rates, and if you can afford one flat rate line in
- your household you obviously aren't in this category. NET didn't like
- the fact that some households used to have a measured service line for
- incoming calls only, so it managed to have the rules changed in its
- favor. (I'm amused by the way NET tells people asking for such a line
- in addition to their flat rate line that "FCC regulations" prevent
- them from granting the request, when it was, of course, NET that
- initiated the regulatory process in the first place.)
-
- I suggest that Mr. Solomon or anyone else in this area who's
- interested in more information call the Public Utilities Department at
- 617-727-3500. It's been a while since I've spoken with these people
- and my facts may be rusty.
-
- To all those Massachusetts NET customers who currently have both a
- flat rate and a measured service line in their home: Congratulations!
- Just hope that you never have to move or otherwise change your
- service, and NET may never notice your good fortune.
-
-
- Carol Springs carols@drilex.dri.mgh.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 13:51:08 PDT
- From: Lang Zerner <langz@eng.sun.com>
- Subject: Re: Measured Service
- Organization: The Great Escape, Inc.
-
-
- In article <8025@accuvax.nwu.edu> leichter@lrw.com writes:
-
- >Jonathan Solomon would like to know if there is a way to get measured
- >service on one of two lines, flat rate on the other. My experience
- >has been that this is officially forbidden.
-
- Huh? I've got a *hunt group* whose primary line is flat rate and
- whose remaining lines are measured. I ordered the lines at different
- times, but the telco knows about all of them whenever I call with
- service requests or queries (they always ask which of my n lines I'm
- talking about).
-
- Pacific Bell is my BOC. Even given that they seem to have no problems
- with it, I'm curious -- why *would* they?
-
- Be seeing you...
-
- Lang Zerner
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Numbers
- Date: 21 May 90 11:52:07 PDT (Mon)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Ed Horch <argon!ebh@pyrnj.pyramid.com> writes:
-
- > BTW, this is another argument against the odious practice some TT sets
- > have with generating specific tone envelopes no matter how long the
- > keys are pressed. In most cases of key bounce, the key bounces for so
- > short a time that the CO wouldn't treat it as two separate key-
- > presses. However, if the set is doing the timing, it will often
- > artificially hold the key "up" long enough (45ms?) to generate two
- > distinct digits.
-
- This is also a marvelous argument against all of those PBX and
- electonic key systems that have proprietary sets that send a little
- generic "beep" back to the user. Toshiba, NEC, some ITT and others use
- this stupid method of "confirming" a key press. If you can't actually
- hear the DTMF go out over the line, how on earth are you supposed to
- know if you are really dialing correctly? I would reject out of hand
- any telephone system that does not: 1. Provide DTMF as long as the key
- is pressed (necessary for most voice mail usage); and 2. Provide
- actual representation of the DTMF as sent to the CO.
-
- If some systems can do it then it's technically possible and no one
- should settle for less.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: <mtxinu!uunet.UU.NET!lcc!lando.la.locus.com!dana@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers
- Date: 21 May 90 20:03:06 GMT
- Reply-To: <mtxinu!uunet.UU.NET!lcc!locus.com!dana@ucbvax.berkeley.edu>
- Organization: Locus Computing Corporation, Inglewood, CA
-
-
- In article <7789@accuvax.nwu.edu> "Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR" <allbery@
- ncoast.org> writes:
-
- >Ticketron has a number in the 216 area code which ends in 0000 (to be
- >exact, 524-0000); I would expect that "easy to remember" numbers like
- >that would be snapped up by commercial types. Of course, they may
- >regret it after they start getting hundreds of calls from kids playing
- >with the phone....
-
- I once had the telephone number 893-3825 aka 8 WE-F*CK. I got a lot
- of phone calls from kids, and one or two from folks looking for an
- escort service. :-)
-
-
- Dana H. Myers KK6JQ | Views expressed here are
- (213) 337-5136 (ex WA6ZGB) | mine and do not necessarily
- dana@locus.com | reflect those of my employer
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: Customized Telephone Numbers (Was NXX-0000)
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 09:30:05 -0400
- From: clements@bbn.com
-
-
- Regarding requesting a specific phone number, here are a couple of
- experiences from New England Tel (Boston area).
-
- David Tamkin relates:
-
- >Everyone at Illinois Bell simply repeated
- >unyieldingly that each of those numbers was somehow reserved or
- >unavailable, and yes, they acknowledged that they were not currently
- >in use, but tough luck.
-
- One possible explanation: When I first moved into my present house, I
- asked for a specific number, namely my previous apartment number with
- one digit changed (617-891-xxxx to 617-861-xxxx). I was told I
- couldn't have it because it was "not available". It turns out that
- number was in a block of numbers they were holding for expansion of a
- Centrex in 617-861.
-
- Some years later I decided to give up and pay for a change of numbers
- due to steadily increasing wrong number rate (my number was a simple
- dialing error away from a growing business). I had learned over the
- years that it is much more productive to deal with bureaucrats in
- person rather than over the phone. They find it harder to ignore the
- fact that a real person is making the request if you are facing them
- across a desk rather than over a phone line. So I went to the
- business office and said that since I was paying for the change I
- wanted to look at my choices. With some reluctance, they showed me
- the list of numbers they had to assign that day. There were about
- twenty numbers on it and I picked one that seemed reasonable. I
- didn't try for a specific unassigned number, though.
-
- [P.S.: No responses yet to my request for info on trunk interface
- cards in Volume 10 Issue 359. Any help would be greatly appreciated.]
-
-
- Bob Clements, K1BC, clements@bbn.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
- Subject: Re: Line Slip
- Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
- Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 15:56:23 GMT
-
-
- In article <7972@accuvax.nwu.edu> Ken Abrams <pallas!kabra437@
- uunet.uu.net> writes:
-
- > I have seen induction put noise into a serial cable and this usually
- > affects all speeds of transmission.
-
- It's not between the serial ports and the modems. We have literally
- hundreds of serial cables running along the same path, with no other
- lines showing a problem.
-
-
- `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
- 'U` Have you hugged your wolf today? <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
- @FIN Dirty words: Zhghnyyl erphefvir vayvar shapgvbaf.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Barts <davidb@pacer.com>
- Subject: Re: Non-Cellular Mobile Phones
- Date: 18 May 90 15:56:11 GMT
-
-
- wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil (Will Martin) writes:
-
- > There are still many areas of the country where there is no cellular
- > coverage, and rural areas probably will never get cellular
- > installations, due to the low number of likely customers. So there
- > still is a need for the VHF mobile-phone service. However, I would
- > also have expected that many people with VHF mobile phones who used
- > them only within metropolitan areas would have switched over to
- > cellular. This would have freed up a lot of capacity in that service,
- > so that those people who really needed the VHF mobiles could get them.
-
- About three years ago, I was riding in a friend's car in rural
- northern New Mexico, when to my surprise, he picked up a cellular
- phone and started dialing a call. My thoughts were ``Now wait a
- minute! This is impossible -- cellular phones are only implemented in
- the largest metropolitan areas and New Mexico, with an average of 10
- people per square mile, has *got* to be one of the last places in the
- country to get cellular phone service. *That* probably won't happen
- for another ten years or more.'' What further floored me was that we
- were at least thirty miles from the nearest incorporated city or town!
-
- After he had finished his call, I asked him how it was possible
- (disclaimer: he wasn't very technically knowledgeable) and the answer
- was something along the lines of: ``The phone company says the
- cellular phone will work from anywhere you can see Tesuque Peak
- (12,000 feet) or Sandia Mountain (10,500 feet).'' Fascinating! Two
- *giant* cells, each covering several thousand square miles! Five or
- six such cells would cover the Rio Grande Valley from the Texas border
- to Colorado.
-
- So anyplace can have cellular phones; just make the cells big enough
- so that each cell has enough customers to support it. Of course, it
- helps to have `natural radio towers' that rise a mile or more over the
- surrounding terrain!
-
- Now this was several years ago, so its possible the situation is
- changed by now. I wouldn't be surprised if they've had to do
- something to split Albuquerque into several cells instead of being
- served by the same Sandia Peak `mega-cell' the rest of central NM was
- (is?) served by. It is also possible that the phone wasn't cellular
- but IMTS. I know from the antenna that it was definitely not a VHF
- radiophone.
-
-
- David Barts Pacer Corporation
- davidb@pacer.uucp ...!uunet!pilchuck!pacer!davidb
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Julian Macassey <julian@bongo.uucp>
- Subject: Re: Articles in 2600 Magazine
- Date: 21 May 90 14:20:18 GMT
- Organization: The Hole in the Wall Hollywood California U.S.A.
-
-
- I sent a copy of the 2600 Mag article to an interested buddy who works
- in a CO. For job security reasons does not want to identify himself,
- but sent me the following which may be food for thought.
-
- ----------------------
- Fascinating....
-
- I run a 1AESS that is the E-911 tandem for the local NSOC (7 offices).
- There HAS to be more to this LoD thing than what is in the article.
- The E-911 is one of the most secure systems in the telephone network.
- Most all is input manually for security reasons. To the best of my
- knowledge there is *NO* way to access the system remotely. The E-911
- section in my building is staffed only by management personnel and the
- entire section has restricted access with a high security key card
- system that is more sophisticated than your local bank autoteller. I
- do not have access to that part of the building. I have always thought
- that the company was a little paranoid about the system. The info in
- the article sort of backs up that conclusion.
-
- Fred
-
- Posted by:
-
- Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo.info.com ucla-an!denwa!bongo!julian
- N6ARE@K6IYK (Packet Radio) n6are.ampr.org [44.16.0.81] voice (213) 653-4495
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Starline and CLASS Not Compatible
- Date: 21 May 90 12:09:49 PDT (Mon)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- On May 21 at 6:31, TELECOM Moderator writes:
-
- > Yet Bell says Distinctive Ringing (two or three CO
- > numbers camped on the same line) won't work either. Any ideas why?
-
- When Pac*Bell offered 976 blocking for the first time a while back,
- you could not get it if you had Commstar II (a version of Starline).
- Apparently, the hack that they had devised for blocking didn't work
- with subscribers on Centrex ports.
-
- I suspect that the same principle applies here. It's not really the *8
- conflict that's the problem, but rather that they just can't get the
- CLASS features to work on Centrex ports. You might see if CLASS
- features are offered to Centrex customers.
-
- Gee, Patrick, maybe you'll have to go back to a PBX :-)
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: pvf@ho3by.att.com
- Date: Fri May 18 17:35:37 EDT 1990
- Subject: Re: AT&T Software Defined Network
-
-
- In TELECOM Digest V10 #359, eli@pws.bull.com asks about the phrase
- "Software Defined Network" on his new AT&T calling card and wonders if
- we just figured out how to make use of software in our network.
-
- Software Defined Network Service (SDN) is a service that has been
- tariffed since 1984. It's a service usually used by business
- customers with multiple locations. One of the features of the service
- offers calling card usage at SDN rates. Did you got your new card
- from your employer? SDN rates dropped considerably last year and many
- new customers signed up. The phrase "Software Defined Network" on
- your card refers to the SDN service, not to some brand new capability
- in our network.
-
-
- Paul Flynn, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 10:57:21 PDT
- From: Jeremy Grodberg <jgro@apldbio.com>
- Subject: Data Access Lines
-
-
- I asked Pacific Bell to send me information about Data Access lines,
- since I am thinking about getting a 9600 baud modem. (Those plans are
- on hold, but that's another story.) The flyer they sent me quoted the
- specifications listed below. I have a degree in Electrical
- Engineering and a background in audio/video equipment and terminology,
- but have still never run into most of the units and measurements they
- quoted. Would anyone care to explain them?
-
- Technical Standards for Data Access Lines
- Attenuation Distortion (slope) -1 to +3 dB
- C-Message Noise 20 dBrnC
- Impulse Noise 59 dBrnCO
- Relative Delay (1000 to 2604 Hz) 200 usec.
-
- Of course I have guesses about what all this means, but I'd like to hear
- from anyone who is *sure* of what a dBrnCO is.
-
-
- Jeremy Grodberg
- jgro@apldbio.com "Beware: free advice is often overpriced!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 13:12 EST
- From: Nutsy Fagen <MJB8949@ritvax.bitnet>
- Subject: System 85 Components
-
-
- Does anyone know were I can get 'summary' descriptions of all the
- major blocks of hardware needed to make an ATT System 85 work?
-
- I recently had the opportunity to see the inards of one of our campus
- Node Rooms. Most equipment was self-explanatory, but a few of the
- labels will a little vague for someone with no real knowledge of the
- system. (Compounded by the fact that I had a wonderful cold, and was
- walking between the 85 degree computer room and the 50 degree outside
- air we were blowing into it :(
-
- Thanks!
-
- Mike
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #373
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa20263;
- 22 May 90 5:00 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa14763;
- 22 May 90 3:33 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab15608;
- 22 May 90 2:30 CDT
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 1:58:55 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #374
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005220158.ab17255@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Tue, 22 May 90 01:58:36 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 374
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Sprint Outage in Massachusetts Caused by MCI Crew [Steve Elias]
- Re: Sprint Outage -- Fiber Cut in Massachusetts [Tom Perrine]
- MCI Shortsightedness (was Re: Telebit vs. Sprint) [Robert Gutierrez]
- Volume Control on Public Phones [Roy Smith]
- Summary: Transmitting Video over Phone Lines [Mike Burrell]
- Sprint Visa Card [Carol Springs]
- Re: The Mis-Named FCC-Mandated Charge [Fred R. Goldstein]
- TDD Dual Party Relay Service Begins June 10 [TELECOM Moderator]
- Chicago Area Help Wanted: Deliver Directories [TELECOM Moderator]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: eli@pws.bull.com
- Subject: Sprint Outage in Massachusetts Caused by MCI Crew
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 15:06:36 -0400
- From: Steve Elias <eli@pws.bull.com>
-
-
- {Network World} today reports that the Massachusetts outage was caused
- by an MCI construction crew working in a railroad yard in Palmer last
- Thursday. They cut a fiber link which carried 57 T-3 circuits.
- Yikes. Sprint service to an "undisclosed number" of customers in
- Mass, NH, and Rhode Island was out for 3.5 hours.
-
- One day earlier, a New Jersey utility worker bulldozing tree stumps
- cut a fiber cable co-owned by Williams Telecom and US Sprint. This
- one knocked out 226 T-3 circuits. Double yikes. MCI leases capacity
- on this fiber, btw. Service was out for about 6 hours.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Tom Perrine <tep@tots.logicon.com>
- Subject: Re: Sprint Outage -- Fiber Cut in Massachusetts
- Date: 21 May 90 21:55:29 GMT
- Reply-To: Tom Perrine <tep@tots.logicon.com>
- Organization: Logicon, Inc., San Diego, California
-
-
- >>Sprint access from Boston is out as of 11:30 AM 5/17. Apparently
- >>there is a fiber cut in Massachusetts somewhere. Also, a big Sprint
- >>fiber in NJ was cut yesterday.
-
- >I attended a presentation by Sprint about a year ago and pressed them
- >on the diversity of their network. They got back to me with maps, and
- >descriptions etc. showing that apparently they were diverse down to
- >the interconnect with the LEC.
-
- "Diverse" does not neccessarily mean "redundant" :-) And what *was*
- redundant may not remain redundant. Several years ago, the Northeast
- was isolated from the ARPAnet for several days when an AT&T fiber was
- cut.
-
- The original redundant lines (copper or microwave?) had been carefully
- routed through *many* different COs/routes, BUT when the fiber routes
- were installed and the traffic was moved, no one noticed that the
- (logical) lines were supposed to be redundant, and routed accordingly.
- All of the supposedly "redundant" lines ended up in the same fiber
- "cable", and when the backhoe came along...
-
- It was the "talk of the net" for weeks. Does anyone remember any more
- details?
-
-
- Tom Perrine (tep) |Internet: tep@tots.Logicon.COM
- Logicon |UUCP: nosc!hamachi!tots!tep
- Tactical and Training Systems Division |-or- sun!suntan!tots!tep
- San Diego CA |GENIE: T.PERRINE
- "Harried: with preschoolers" |+1 619 455 1330
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: The Great Fire of Mother's Day, 1988 in Hinsdale,
- IL did not bode well for sites in the Chicago area, either. Both
- Usenet and Fidonet sites were disconnected from each other for varying
- periods of time during May that year. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Robert Gutierrez <ranma@calvin.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: MCI Shortsightedness (was Re: Telebit vs. Sprint)
- Date: 22 May 90 01:44:41 GMT
- Reply-To: Robert Gutierrez <ranma@calvin.arc.nasa.gov>
- Organization: NASA Science Internet Network Operations.
-
-
- john@bovine.ati.com (John Higdon) writes:
-
- > Robert Gutierrez <ranma@calvin.arc.nasa.gov> writes:
-
- > > Kinda funny in that when I worked there, I always used Sprint for my
- > > V.32 connections (9600 baud) when MCI couldn't even make it through an
- > > opening handshake....
-
- > As far as I am concerned, MCI is not a real player for serious long
- > distance users. While they may have lots of "suits" running around
- > schmoozing it up to their corporate customers, the service they
- > provide is substandard to either Sprint or AT&T by an amount far
- > exceeding any discount they provide.
-
- The problem really is nobody realizes that MCI has been courting
- business ever since (William) McGowan started it all as an OCC back in
- the 60's (as Microwave Communications Inc, what 'MCI' stands for,
- though the original name had been long since abandoned years ago).
- When I took a company instruction class when I started working there,
- it was a wealth of information concerning it's history (basically a
- well condensed version of McGowan's book), and the one point that was
- always clear was that McGowan really only wanted big business, because
- that was where the money was at. This should have been clear to
- anybody who knows even basic MCI history when they started with leased
- lines for the trucking history (and starting the whole OCC [Other
- Common Carrier] industry itself).
-
- Why MCI went into the residential long-lines business is anybody's
- guess. Yes, sure McGowan says it was the next natural step for them
- to 'compete' with AT&T (and maybe pride, but the only pride in
- servicing the public I ever saw was from his partner, V. Orville
- Wright), but I suspect that McGowan only wanted residential service to
- use what would have been otherwise unused capacity on their fledging
- network. Of course, the residental market took off so much that they
- ended up taking too much room on "their" network, and had to expand it
- (much to their dismay) to keep their original targets from suffering
- ... which was the businesses.
-
- At this point, McGowan couldn't back out of the residental market
- because of the uproar that would happen (which they could probably
- handle), but more likely the pressure AT&T would put on Washington
- D.C. saying that MCI really never wanted to encourage competition in
- the long distance market, they just wanted to bulldoze AT&T out of the
- way (via the courts) to fatten their pockets.
-
- (I usually don't do this, but this posting make me nervous):
-
- The opinons expressed herein do not represent NASA, NASA Science
- Internet Project, or my employer (Sterling Software), and thus are not
- responsible for such opinons expressed.
-
-
- Robert Gutierrez
- Office of Space Science and Applications,
- NASA Science Internet Project - Network Operations Center.
- Moffett Field, California.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 15:18:29 EDT
- From: Roy Smith <roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu>
- Subject: Volume Control on Public Phones
-
-
- I saw something this morning I've never seen before. In a pay phone
- at a service area on the NJ Turnpike, there was a button to press to
- adjust the volume (each press makes is louder). Has anybody ever seen
- one of these before? It looked like a standard AT&T coin phone in a
- booth.
-
-
- /roy
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 16:10 EST
- From: Nutsy Fagen <MJB8949@ritvax.bitnet>
- Subject: Summary: Transmitting Video Over Phone Lines
-
-
- Several weeks ago, I requested information to assist me in remotely
- viewing a computer display. Due to the number of replies I received,
- this is a general response to everyone.
-
- My original concept of 'straight' video over the phone lines was pretty
- much blown out of the water. Anything clear enough to read would cost
- at least $5,000 for the equipment.
-
- However, almost everyone reply mentioned using a program which
- interactively communicates between the host and remote station (via
- modem/com port). The programs suggested were:
-
- PCAnywhere, call (516) 462-0040
- Carbon Copy (Meridian Technology)
- Remote (Microstuf)
- PCRemote (PC Magazine, several months ago)
-
- The first three cost $100-$200, the third is public domain. I haven't
- had the opportunity to use any of the programs, so I can't comment on
- their effectiveness.
-
- Unfortunately, the budget recently slammed shut, so we can't even
- purchase the modem required to use the public domain software.
- Hopefully this information will benefit the rest of you also
- interested.
-
- Have fun!
-
-
- Mike Bunnell
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Carol Springs <drilex!carols@husc6.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Sprint Visa Card
- Date: 22 May 90 01:02:57 GMT
- Organization: DRI/McGraw-Hill, Lexington, MA
-
-
- Dave Rand writes:
-
- >U S Sprint, not to be outdone, has included the following notice in
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >the latest bill (arrived today).
- >"Now... a VISA card and a US Sprint FONCARD _all in one!_
-
- Actually, my May/June insert claims that "US Sprint was the first long
- distance company to introduce a card of this kind."
-
- Don't recall whether Sprint has hyped its card to its entire customer
- base before -- they may actually mean "first to test market such a
- card."
-
- MCI gets around the regulatory issues by allowing its customers to
- charge their phone calls to bank-issued Visas. MCI has cut deals with
- a number of Visa issuers, with more being added.
-
-
- Carol Springs carols@drilex.dri.mgh.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Fred R. Goldstein" <goldstein@carafe.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: Re: The Mis-Named FCC-Mandated Charge
- Date: 21 May 90 16:33:33 GMT
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corp., Littleton MA USA
-
-
- In article <7971@accuvax.nwu.edu>, wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil (Will
- Martin) writes...
-
- >I note people on the list stating that they pay $3.00 even. First off,
- >if this is an FCC-mandated surcharge, and thus national in scope, why
- >is it higher here than elsewhere? What is the justification for it
- >varying from region to region? Should it not be identical nationwide?
-
- There's an FCC-imposed _cap_ on it, but the telco can charge less than
- the cap for residential subscribers. The FCC must approve the rate.
- It tends to be higher in rural states, where the cost of local service
- delivery is higher.
-
- >Secondly, this charge has risen over its life. I seem to recall it
- >started out at $1.50, though that may have been $2.00. I can
- >understand the motivation behind the charge, to replace the revenue
- >lost from kickbacks from LD service (I may not *like* it, but I can
- >*understand* it... Grrrr... :-), but what possible excuse can there be
- >for it having *risen*? The kickback-revenue was lost when the breakup
- >and deregulation occurred, and the charge was instituted then. Over
- >the ensuing years, it should have decreased, so as to be phased out,
- >not increased. Who paid off who to get *this* gravy train?
-
- The kickback from LD _calls_ has been reduced and continues to be
- reduced, but the separations formulae which put much of the cost of
- local telephone service into the interstate jurisdiction haven't been
- reduced accordingly. Thus the fixed charges (which replace part of
- the cents per minute of LD calls) go up in order to make up the
- difference. It used to be that heavy callers subsidized light
- callers. That's less true now, though still true to some extent.
-
- The gravy train leads to places like Wyoming and North Dakota, where
- the average cost to deliver local telephone service is much higher
- than average. (Beehive Tel. in Utah invests $7000 per subscriber
- line. See Art Brothers' column in Telephone Engineer & Management.
- The national average is more like $1000.)
-
- In order to keep this flowing, separations cauases about 30% of the
- non-traffic-sensitive (NTS) cost (not _price_) of local service to be
- put under federal jurisdiction. That's for the line, not for calls
- (which would be traffic-sensitive). Given an average NTS subscriber
- line _cost_ of about $20/month, and a 30%ish federal share, the
- $6/month cap is reasonable. It's lower here in Mass. since the NTS
- cost is only about $13/month, per NETel filings.
-
- >Is the income from this surcharge treated differently, for accounting
- >purposes, than the income from the "real" charges for telephone
- >service by the BOCs/telcos? Or does it all just get dumped into the
- >same pot? (I have this image of the cellar of the new SW Bell
- >building here looking like Scrooge McDuck's money vault... :-)
-
- It's all "real" income, but this is FCC-regulated rather than
- state-regulated. The pots are handled differently; the federal pot is
- skimmed for a special fund to subsidize high-cost rural telcos.
- Otherwise, rates in the boonies would be a LOT higher than they are.
- City rates would be a little lower.
-
- >Lastly, is there any official plan for this charge to *ever* go away?
-
- Of course not, since it's as much a part of your bill as the
- state-regulated part! The only way it would go away is if Congress
- modified the Communications Act, and there's no good reason to do that
- here. The telcos are guaranteed a fair rate of return, and if they
- didn't get it one way, they'd get it another way.
-
-
- Fred R. Goldstein
- goldstein@carafe.enet.dec.com or goldstein@delni.enet.dec.com
- voice: +1 508 486 7388
- opinions are mine alone; sharing requires permission
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 1:21:17 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: TDD Dual Party Relay Service Begins June 10
-
-
- Starting June 10, 1990, all telephone companies in Illinois, in
- cooperation with the Illinois Telecommunications Access Corporation
- and AT&T, will begin providing *Dual Party Relay Service* within
- Illinois.
-
- *Dual Party Relay Service* makes it possible for persons who use a TDD
- (a typing device used by deaf or hearing-impaired persons for
- telecommunication) and persons who use normal telephone service to
- communicate through the aid of a specially trained relay operator.
-
- For example, a person who uses a TDD will be able to call his or her
- doctor, or the doctor can call a patient who uses a TDD without buying
- special equipment. Until now, both parties needed TDD's to
- communicate.
-
- The Illinois Relay Center is located in Chicago and will operate 24
- hours per day, seven days a week, including all holidays. Access to
- the Relay Center will be via toll-free numbers. TDD users should call
- 1-800-526-0844 to make outgoing calls. Persons using a regular voice
- phone should call 1-800-526-0857 to request connection to the TDD of a
- deaf person. Calls completed through the relay operators will be
- billed at regular telephone company rates.
-
- Under the new law in Illinois, ITAC also distributes TDD's to
- qualified Illinois residents who are deaf or hearing-impaired. For
- more information on ITAC, call or write:
-
- Illinois Telecommunications Access Corporation
- Post Office Box 64509
- Chicago, IL 60664
- Phone: 312-419-4200 (Voice) 312-419-4211 (TDD)
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 1:08:39 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Chicago Area Help Wanted: Deliver Directories
-
-
- Illinois Bell is looking for part time employees this summer during
- June and July to deliver a few million copies of the 1990 edition of
- the {Ameritech Pages Plus} -- the Chicago alphabetical phone
- directory. Generally, routes are available all over the metro area.
- Applicants must be age 18 or older, and have an insured automobile.
-
- In addition, other temporary work may be available, loading and
- unloading directories. Some clerical work may be available. For more
- information, print out this message, answering the questions given
- below.
-
- Mail the answered questions to:
-
- Ameritech Directory Distribution
- Post Office Box 413
- Bedford Park, IL 60499-0413 *DO NOT TELEPHONE or APPLY IN PERSON*
-
-
- Name___________________________________________________________
-
- Address________________________________________________________
-
- City__________________________State________Zip_________________
-
- Home Phone_____________________________________________________
-
- How many hours per day between 8 AM and dusk do you have
- available for this work? What days of the week?
-
- _______________________________________________________________
-
- Would you prefer: Clerical work_______Loading/Unloading_______
-
- If you are not available, please mention this employment opportunity
- to a friend, relative or neighbor.
-
- Ameritech/Illinois Bell is an Equal Opportunity Employer m/f/h
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #374
- ******************************
-
- ISSUE 375 DELAYED IN TRANSMISSION. IT FOLLOWS 377 IN THIS ARCHIVES.
-
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa17334;
- 23 May 90 5:36 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab13505;
- 23 May 90 3:45 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab09718;
- 23 May 90 2:38 CDT
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 2:21:17 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #376
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005230221.ab28052@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 23 May 90 02:20:28 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 376
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Distributed TELCO [Gordon Burditt]
- Re: Distributed TELCO [C. D. Covington]
- Unlimited Cellular Calling in DC Metro Area? [John L. Shelton]
- Re: Customized Telephone Numbers (Was NXX-0000) [Phil Brownfield]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Gordon Burditt <sneaky!gordon@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Distributed TELCO
- Date: 22 May 90 05:46:24 GMT
- Organization: Gordon Burditt
-
-
- >|Upon picking up a telephone for the first time after connecting up the
- >|system, the phone says, your telephone number is 412346,234457 please
- >|enter the names for your directory listing. You key the name that will
- >|list you in the electronic directory.
-
- >Someone has to administer the directory. Someone has to make sure
- >that the voice is there to ask you for your listing information.
-
- A directory requires little administration if each box can hold the
- entire planetary-system-wide directory. The box knows your own entry
- (it could be in EAROM or something), and if the full directory got
- scrambled or lost, it could get it from a neighbor. Adding or
- changing your entry could be broadcast to all nodes. Directory
- entries could be broadcast periodically (every few months) or when
- it's evident that there's a problem. A small store-and-forward
- capability for changes would help here for temporarily down nodes.
-
- If the nodes can't hold the whole directory, and you've got bandwith
- to burn, there's always the flood propogation of a query, with the
- identified box(es) responding, "That's me!", along with the full
- entry.
-
- Do residential-type users even need or want a directory entry anyway?
- How many would have directory entries today if it cost money to be
- *LISTED*, at, say, half the rate for a business listing of similar
- size? Businesses certainly spend enough money in an obnoxious manner
- telling you how to call them through numerous channels - telemarketing
- unfortunately being one of them - even though the directories exist.
-
- This scheme does, of course, assume that nobody will try to pretend to
- be someone else. Nobody really cares if most of the residential
- entries are for "Fido" and "Tabby", except people really named "Fido"
- or "Tabby".
-
- >Someone has to make sure that it doesn't ask again unless you
- >specifically want to change your listing.
-
- My VCR already knows whether it needs to go through the
- what-channels-are-active procedure or not when it powers up,
- presumably by noting whether its battery-backed-up RAM got wiped by a
- long stay at the repair center.
-
- >Someone has to maintain and update the routing tables. Someone,
-
- Doesn't the Internet have this done automatically? All a node needs
- initially is its direct neighbors.
-
- >again, has to administer the directory. Someone has to force the
- >uncooperative to let other calls be routed through their boxes.
-
- The uncooperative may be less of a problem than the special cases,
- especially if the hardware is built so shutting off pass-through calls
- isn't at all convenient or possible. But who wants their box
- permanently overloaded by setting up the first USA-Europe link? Who
- wants to talk to Europe badly enough to pay for the extra cost for the
- extraordinary hardware needed for such a link? Who worries about
- whether there is enough capacity into an area, until the person
- controlling that box takes it down and moves? Who worries about
- whether the net becomes partitioned, or some area can't be hooked in
- at all? Who worries about whether police and fire communications can
- be knocked out by the failure of any one of several boxes? These are
- the problems that will kill the scheme.
-
- Unfortunately, you also have to worry about the scum who think it's
- fun to write a "box virus", create obscene directory entries, direct
- calls to competitors to them instead, and spy on other people's
- conversations.
-
- From the hardware description, I'd imagine it might work well within
- an urban area. Assume an 'eye' can see up to a couple of miles, line
- of sight only. Now, who pays for extra "relay" boxes in the
- "boondocks" farmland and mountains between large cities, and the
- structures to mount them on, and the power wiring to run them? Who
- arranges to get over geographical and political obstacles, like lakes,
- rivers, hills, and wide areas of freeway and parks?
-
- (One technical question, though. An "eye" looks south from my house,
- and sees seven "eyes" within one degree of arc and a half-mile looking
- north at it. Some of these are partially covered by the others.
- These are, of course, a row of houses each talking to the next. I
- want to talk to the closest one. But won't they interfere with each
- other?)
-
- >How? It replaces telcos as we now know them with something else,
- >something else that must be paid for. There's still a bill to pay;
- >all you've done is change the telco bill to a bill by some other name.
-
- I think this bill works just like your TV (non-cable) bill: you pay
- for the TV, and for the power to run it, and if it breaks, you get it
- fixed or buy another one. If you want upgrades, buy an upgrade, or a
- whole new unit. However, if the only thing broken is the link between
- you and one neighbor (who's at the end of a street and cut off), and
- the problem is in your fourth 'eye', you may not feel like having it
- fixed, because it doesn't bother you. And besides, why can't the guy
- across the street get HIS fourth eye fixed (it went out last year) and
- get the cut-off neighbor connected?
-
- >the way it sounds. Hardware cannot maintain itself; there needs to be
- >a staff of repair personnel, and they need tools and supplies.
-
- The box vendor(s) will be glad to supply these - probably at an
- inflated price, just like appliance, consumer electronics, and
- (consumer) computer repair works now, including the service contracts
- that seem to cover a lot more than they really do. Or, you just chuck
- the box and buy a new one.
-
- In the future you won't have to worry about such issues, due to the
- War on Drugs. Here will be the phone book:
-
- 0 - A recording of this list
- 1 - A long distance call. You will be connected to the next or previous
- person to make a long distance call in another area.
- 2 (C) - Collect call. You will be connected to the next available
- person who accepted a collect call.
- 3 (D) - Drug Dealers, or at least people who pretend to be drug dealers.
- 3 (F) - Drug Enforcement Administration "Fink" line
- 4 (I) - International call. You will be connected to the next or previous
- person to make an international call in another country.
- 5 (L) - Local call. You will be connected to the next or previous person
- to make a local call in your area.
- 6 (O) - Official Government Information
- 7 (P) - Police Tip line
- 8 (800) - Accept a collect call. You will be connected to the next available
- person who makes a collect call.
- 9 (911) - Emergency services
-
- Anyone possessing a telephone with something known as a 'ringer' or
- 'bell', or claiming to know their own 'telephone number' is subject to
- heavy fines and imprisonment for revealing telephone company secrets.
-
- Your telephone bill will include itemized costs for the cost of taping
- your calls, and the cost of someone reviewing it, and the cost of
- arresting you or the other party, if necessary. The Government Is
- Your Friend!
-
-
- Gordon L. Burditt
- sneaky.lonestar.org!gordon
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "C. D. Covington" <uafhcx!cdc@uafhp.uark.edu>
- Subject: Re: Distributed TELCO
- Date: 22 May 90 14:02:27 GMT
- Organization: College of Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
-
-
- In article <8063@accuvax.nwu.edu>, karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
- writes:
-
- > there want to tackle this? Infrared LED is probably the best idea for
-
- I have thought about this type of link for many different
- applications, particularly since it is not regulated. What I keep
- coming up against is the fact that this would be only a fair weather
- system. I have real doubts as to how infrared would do in rain and
- fog over any kind of useful distance.
-
- After reading the original article, I began wondering if a local
- traffic concentrating mechanism of the type you describe might be
- effective when combined with a (more traditional) sparse tree. I can
- envision this sort of thing getting started in some neighborhood in
- the Bay Area where everyone is high tech. There is nothing against
- starting a cooperative, like Cable & Wireless (TDX) did when they were
- getting started. Only we are talking about setting up a local
- neighborhood cooperative instead of a diverse business cooperative.
-
- I keep coming back to the old low powered radio link solution.
- Perhaps my ham radio background is coming through, or maybe the four
- years in 2-way FM radio design at Motorola, or perhaps it's the
- comments I saw from the sovam.uucp contributor about *leapfrog*
- technology which could bypass both copper and fiber and set up a
- completely wireless cellular-like local plant. Reallocating local
- loops is not possible, where radio channels are as flexible as they
- come.
-
- Maybe the real idea that gets stuck in my head has its roots in the
- fact that I have a cordless phone at home. This is not an amazing
- fact particularly considering the installed base of cordless phones.
- Couple this with the density of cordless phones in my neighborhood and
- you get a real interference problem. I would not be surprised to find
- out that over 50% of my neighbors have cordless phones. That's
- certainly the case for my immediate neighbors. Based on the sources
- of interference I have tracked down a couple of times, they don't have
- to be that close to cause problems, particularly false ringing.
-
- Anyway, all this rambling brings me to the following anecdote which
- I came close to posting when it happened, but it is even more relevant
- to the current topic, so I include it here for your
- consideration/entertainment.
-
- ---------------------------------------------
-
- I was standing about one foot from my cordless base making a series
- of local phone calls. I turned the remote on to get dial tone for the
- next call, but I noticed that it seemed strangely weak, not like it
- was for the previous call. It occured to me that the likelihood of
- picking up someone else's base unit was very small unless they had 1)
- the same manufacturer and 2) the same 'security code' (in quotes, keep
- reading). To eliminate this *remote* possibility (I had been having
- problems with the phone itself, locking up and putting noise on the
- line), I pulled the power cord on my base unit. No change. I then
- proceeded to dial my own phone number. An extension rang.
- Whoooooaaa. I understand interference, but picking up someone else's
- phone is completely unacceptable.
-
- Well, this must just be an immediate neighbor. So using my quick
- mind I thought all I had to do was to try my neighbors' phone numbers
- to see who would return a busy signal. After three or four attempts,
- no such luck. Well, I was having to baby sit for the kids, so I
- couldn't leave the house for very long at a time but I did manage to
- stroll around the block while trying to determine the source of the
- signal through signal strength differences. I could travel over about
- a one block square and still pick up this guy's phone, but it wasn't
- getting any stronger, so I couldn't tell where he was.
-
- After noticing that the signal seemed to be stronger in my back
- yard than the front, I wondered if it might possibly be coming from
- the next street over. Now we live with our back yard in the flood
- plan of a creek. From my back fence to the back fence of the next
- house across the creek is about 100 yards. Well, I was having some
- trouble telling this guy's dial tone from other interfering
- conversations, so I told my son I would call him on the phone next to
- the computer where he was playing games with his sister. I told him
- just to keep talking back and forth to verify the identity of the
- signal.
-
- I lost him once as I crossed the bridge on the creek and had to
- redial. After that the signal got stronger and stronger as I went
- down the street on the other side of the creek until it began to fade
- some. I then backed up to the point where the signal seemed to be the
- strongest and stepped back and forth across the street to try to tell
- which side of the street I should try. It wasn't obvious but I took a
- chance on the house on the side of the street *away* from the creek.
-
- The signal became *very* clear as I approached the front door. I
- knocked. I explained to the man who came to the door who the heck I
- was and what in the world I was doing. He was holding one child and
- another was standing by him. He was quite understanding. "Do you
- have a cordless phone, by any chance?" I asked. "Yes I do." "Is it
- by any chance a GE cordless phone," I asked. After entering the home
- and going to his phone, it was indeed a GE. "What is the security
- code on the bottom of the phone." We turned the two handsets over and
- the exact same security code appeared on identical equipment. Amazing
- Watson. We exchanged names and phone numbers in case of any
- inexplicable calls on our respective phone bills.
-
- I submit at this point that the technology responsible for the
- cordless phone revolution has reached its limit and we must move
- toward the next generation technology which will almost certainly
- involve spread spectrum encoding. This has been on the minds of
- everyone in this industry I would guess as I first heard about it ten
- years ago. This is the only real way to simultaneously solve the
- interference problem and install a high level of security.
-
- I relate this story to point out this problem once again and also
- suggest the spread spectrum radio link as the medium of choice for the
- NeighborTel concept. The remaining problem, as well as the reason we
- don't all have spread spectrum cordless phones, is cost. Oh well.
-
- If the telco has the resources to replace copper with fiber fast
- enough to keep up with ISDN features coming down the pike, then all of
- this will not be competitive. If we still have copper five or ten
- years from now, then there may be some real possibilities for
- distributed systems.
-
-
- C. David Covington (WA5TGF) cdc@uafhcx.uark.edu (501) 575-6583
- Asst Prof, Elec Eng Univ of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 13:34:49 PDT
- From: "John L. Shelton" <jshelton@ads.com>
- Subject: Unlimited Cellular Calling in DC Metro Area?
-
-
- While visiting the DC area, I noticed several advertisements for
- cellular phones claiming unlimited night/weekend calling (7pm-7am) at
- no additional charge for the $39.95 monthly rate.
-
- Seems pretty amazing. Is this for real?
-
-
- =John=
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: Customized Telephone Numbers (Was NXX-0000)
- Organization: Motorola Semiconductor, Austin, Texas
- Date: 22 May 90 21:01:26 CDT (Tue)
- Reply-To: oakhill!motaus!phil@cs.utexas.edu
- From: Phil Brownfield <oakhill!phil%blackice.motaus.LOCAL@cs.utexas.edu>
-
-
- In article <8078@accuvax.nwu.edu> Bob Clements writes:
-
- >I was told I couldn't have it because it was "not available".
- >It turns out that number was in a block of numbers they were
- >holding for expansion of a Centrex in 617-861.
-
- Is this another possibility: Might an unused phone number be
- unavailable for reissue if it was only recently disconnected from a
- previous user?
-
-
- Phil Brownfield
- phil@motaus.sps.mot.com
- {cs.utexas.edu!oakhill, mcdchg}!motaus!phil
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #376
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa18670;
- 23 May 90 6:25 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa01945;
- 23 May 90 4:48 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ac13505;
- 23 May 90 3:45 CDT
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 2:47:04 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #377
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005230247.ab14945@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 23 May 90 02:45:45 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 377
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Data Access Lines [Larry Lippman]
- Re: Data Access Lines [Chip Rosenthal]
- Re: FCC REN Numbers (Was: BT Phones, etc) [Julian Macassey]
- Re: Area 908 Prefix Listings [Stan M. Krieger]
- Re: Interesting Police Technology [Mike Koziol]
- Re: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers [Nigel Allen]
- 10XXX Bugs [David Leibold]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: Data Access Line
- Date: 23 May 90 00:05:39 EDT (Wed)
- From: Larry Lippman <kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- In article <8084@accuvax.nwu.edu> jgro@apldbio.com (Jeremy Grodberg)
- writes:
-
- > I asked Pacific Bell to send me information about Data Access lines,
- > since I am thinking about getting a 9600 baud modem.
- > The flyer they sent me quoted the specifications listed below.
- > Would anyone care to explain them?
-
- > Technical Standards for Data Access Lines
- > Attenuation Distortion (slope) -1 to +3 dB
-
- This specification really describes the frequency response
- characteristics of the data access line. This parameter is a
- deviation range in dB from a FLAT frequency response in the range of
- 300 to 3,000 Hz.
-
- > C-Message Noise 20 dBrnC
-
- This specification describes noise level in dB *above* a
- reference level of -90 dBm (1 picowatt). The "C" means that the
- measurement is compensated according to the C-message weighting curve,
- which adjusts the measurement to more realistically approximate both
- the characteristics of the human ear and the transmission of the WECO
- 500-type telephone set.
-
- > Impulse Noise 59 dBrnCO
-
- This specification describes noise level in dB above a
- reference level of -90 dBm adjusted for C-message weighting, and
- *further* adjusted by the loss of the subscriber CO loop itself. The
- "0" at the end refers to adding the subscriber loop loss to the noise
- measurement in dBrnC.
-
- > Relative Delay (1000 to 2604 Hz) 200 usec.
-
- This is more correctly referred to as envelope delay
- distortion, and represents the maximum phase shift of a signal
- expressed in a unit of time. To put this figure in perspective, bear
- in mind that 200 usec is 0.2 times the period of one cycle of a 1 kHz
- signal, or stated another way, a phase shift of 72 degrees.
- Obviously, as the frequency increases, the implication of a fixed 200
- usec delay interval becomes more severe!
-
- > Of course I have guesses about what all this means, but I'd like to hear
- > from anyone who is *sure* of what a dBrnCO is.
-
- Trust me :-), I am *sure* what dBrnC 0 (often written with a
- space between the C and the zero) means.
-
- It is important to remember that the above data access line
- specifications are from the subscriber location to the CO *only*, and
- may have little meaning if you are calling outside your own CO. In
- fact, these figures may have little meaning in calling another
- subscriber in your own CO *unless* they, too, have a data access line!
-
- I have oversimplified many of the above definitions, but they
- are accurate as stated; unfortunately, I don't have time at the moment
- to offer a more comprehensive answer.
-
-
- Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp. "Have you hugged your cat today?"
- {boulder||decvax||rutgers||watmath}!acsu.buffalo.edu!kitty!larry
- VOICE: 716/688-1231 || FAX: 716/741-9635 {utzoo||uunet}!/ \aerion!larry
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Chip Rosenthal <chip@chinacat.unicom.com>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Date: 22 May 90 19:47:49 GMT
- Organization: Unicom Systems Development, Austin, TX
-
-
- In article <8084@accuvax.nwu.edu> jgro@apldbio.com (Jeremy Grodberg)
- writes:
-
- >Of course I have guesses about what all this means, but I'd like to hear
- >from anyone who is *sure* of what a dBrnCO is.
-
- dB is a relative measure of voltage or power. In telecom, you get
- zillions of suffixes which tell you "relative to what", and in some
- cases the measurement condition. [1]
-
- dBm is commonly used to specify a level referenced to a "digital
- milliwatt" signal. This is a 1004Hz sine wave of 1mW power into
- 600ohms.
-
- dBrn is the signal level relative to a reference noise value of 1pW.
- 0dBrn = 1pW = -90dBm.
-
- dBrnC indicates that the measurement has been made with a C-message
- weighting filter. This filter emulates the response of the human ear.
- That is, a measurement in dBrnC is power over the range of hearing
- relative to a 1pW noise source.
-
- dBrnC0 indicates that the reference is against a zero transmission
- level. That is, it is similar to dBrnC, but the reference is not a
- 1pW noise source but rather the residual noise when no signal is
- applied.
-
- > C-Message Noise 20 dBrnC
- > Impulse Noise 59 dBrnCO
-
- Here is what I think they are saying. Since:
-
- dB = 10 * log(P1/P2) (for power measurements)
- dB = 20 * log(V1/V2) (for voltage measurements)
-
- They are saying the residual noise on the line after applying
- C-Message filtering is:
-
- 20dB = 10 * log(P/1pW) (from def'n of dBrnC)
-
- or P = 10^(20/10) * 1pW = 100pW
-
- And the random impulse noise is:
-
- 59dB = 10 * log(P/100pw) (from def'n of dBm0, with 100pW ref)
-
- or P = 10^(59/10) * 100pw = 79mW
-
- Objectives for noise are generally about 28dBrnC for short-haul (<60
- miles) lines and 34dBrnC for long-haul (<1000 miles) lines. You can
- probably get by with 15dB to 25dB S/N for error-free digital
- transmission. [2] I'm not sure what kind of levels you'd like to see
- for a 9600bps modem. Maybe the manufacturer can provide these
- numbers.
-
- [1] Motorola Telecommunications Devices Databook. There are a whole slew
- of dB definitions in the glossary. (However, I'll probably stop using
- their products now that they've joined the piss-in-a-bottle mania.)
-
- [2] Digital Telephony. John C. Bellamy, John Wiley & Sons, 1982. Very
- good reference for digital telecom.
-
-
- Chip Rosenthal | You aren't some icon carved out
- chip@chinacat.Unicom.COM | of soap, sent down here to clean
- Unicom Systems Development, 512-482-8260 | up my reputation. -John Hiatt
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Julian Macassey <julian@bongo.uucp>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN Numbers (Was: BT Phones, etc)
- Date: 22 May 90 15:16:11 GMT
- Organization: The Hole in the Wall Hollywood California U.S.A.
-
-
- In article <8050@accuvax.nwu.edu>, mtndew!friedl@uunet.uu.net writes:
-
- > Julian Macassey writes about RENs (Ringer Equivalence Numbers),
- > quoting chapter and verse from FCC part 68 rules. This comes at a
- > fortuitous time because I was just wondering about it myself.
-
- > Why do the RENs vary? I have noticed quite a wide range of ringer
- > equivalences, and while thinking about this I came up with a bunch of
- > statements that a telephone designer might make about them. Which of
- > these are true or likely and which are false?
-
- RENs vary because different designs of ringers consume
- different amounts of power. The same reason Horse Power varies.
-
- > "physical bells take 1.0 REN, that's just the way it is"
- >
- Physical Bells, or gong ringers as they are known take an REN
- (Ringer Equivalence Number) of 1.0 A because they are the standard by
- which other devices are measured. The classic gong ringer in Western
- Electric telephone is the standard ringer. I have seen Korean
- telephones with gong ringers rated at 3.0 A. Yup, two of those phones
- on the same line would not ring.
-
- > "it's harder to make the ringer circuit with lower RENs"
-
- It's very easy, but seeing as the REN is an indication of
- power consumption, a low REN ringer may not be heard. The purpose of
- ringers is to be heard. The most efficient ringer, if hearing and
- directionality is important, is the classic gong ringer (REN 1.0 A).
- Modems, phone answering machines etc, often have an REN of 0.0. They
- just need to sniff the AC voltage to then get the logic to grab the
- line etc. Yes, you could make a REN 0.0 device that would power a
- steam whistle. But most of the world's ringers are self powered.
-
- > "lower REN is better because you can get more instruments
- > on a line"
-
- Yes, this is true. The telco claims that they can ring a total
- REN of 5.0. So you could have ten 0.5 REN phones on line.
-
- > "we didn't really think about the REN when we built the
- > phone, that's just what it ended up being"
-
- This is partially true. The power consumed by the ringer has
- always been important. In the old days, the company that built the
- ringers also built the ring generators, so they were matched. When
- subscriber equipment was deregulated, the FCC and Ma Bell came up with
- the REN to enable ringers to be measured. I am sure that to this day
- that AT&T have massive docs describing ringers and ring generators.
-
- > "the phone switch likes higher REN phones better"
-
- Nope, Higher REN phones consume more power. The telco worries
- that you are using their power. I had a hilarious meeting with AT&T
- dweebs once about on-hook power consumption and what it would cost
- them in extra batteries if every subscriber took 1 Ma while on hook to
- run dialer memories etc. If your phone has an REN of 0.2, they are
- quite happy.
-
- > "we always built phones with REN=xx and saw no reason to change"
-
- Nope, They built standard electro-mechanically resonant gong
- ringers because they gave the highest SPL per Watt. To this day, their
- is not a better ringer known to me than a classic AT&T double gong
- ringer. They are not cheap, electronic ringers are much cheaper.
-
- > "if the REN is too low, it will trigger sporadically (say,
- > via pulse dialing on another extension"
-
- If the REN is too low, nothing will happen, except it will
- consume less power. The REN can be 0.0, look at your modem. The
- sporadic triggering you talk of, called "bell tap" in the trade, is
- causeed by poorly designed ringers of any REN. The 3.0 REN monster I
- mentioned above bell tapped.
-
- > "off-the-shelf phone line interfaces have REN=xx so that's
- > why we used it".
-
- I don't understand this statement.
-
- > Should one even bother to look at the REN when buying a phone?
-
- Yes, if you have more than one instrument on a line, it is
- important. If the Telco will ring ringers up to a total of 5 REN and
- you add another instrument bringing your REN to or above the limit,
- several things may happen:
-
- All the bells will stop ringing. Some of the bells will stop
- ringing. Some will stop and others will be weak. They will all be
- weak.
-
-
- Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo.info.com ucla-an!denwa!bongo!julian
- N6ARE@K6IYK (Packet Radio) n6are.ampr.org [44.16.0.81] voice (213) 653-4495
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 11:43:49 EDT
- From: S M Krieger <smk@attunix.att.com>
- Subject: Re: Area 908 Prefix Listings
- Organization: Summit NJ
-
-
- > Inclusion of Elizabeth means that 908 would reach up at least to exit
- > 13 of the New Jersey Turnpike; I also see Roselle, Unionville,
- > Carteret, Rahway, and Woodbridge in 908.
-
- As I remember the map that was published in the {Newark Star Ledger}
- last year, in the eastern part of the state, Union County (Elizabeth
- and points south) is in 908, while Essex County (Newark and north)
- remains in 201.
-
- One impact of this is that the town of Springfield will have numbers
- in both area codes. While Springfield in wholly in Union County, it
- is served by the Summit (Union County), Unionville (Union in Union
- County), and Millburn (Essex County) central offices.
-
- Also I don't know how this will affect the phones in terminal A of
- Newark Airport (which is in Elizabeth); unless NJ Bell had made it
- easy by connecting them to a Newark central office.
-
-
- Stan Krieger
- Summit, NJ
- ...!att!attunix!smk
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 19:51:18 EST
- From: Mike Koziol <MJK2660@ritvm.bitnet>
- Subject: Re: Interesting Police Technology
-
- The computer terminals used in police cars are called Mobile Data
- Terminals (MDT's). They are becoming quite popular because the police
- officer is able to do his own lookup of license plates and suspect
- information. In addition the information to the terminal is not easily
- intercepted by scanner users so it is secure. The police officer can
- also communicate with other cars or with their dispatcher with out
- anyone else (suspect standing outside of the car for instance) knowing
- the contents of the conversation.
-
- Various "hot" keys are usually included so the officer can hit a key
- when his status changes and this information can instantly be relayed
- to the police dispatcher. Another nice feature is that forms can be
- stored in the MDT and be called up on the screen. The officer fills in
- the blanks and his report is transmitted to the records section with
- no more human intervention needed for data entry.
-
- A couple of years ago I saw a talk on the Dallas Texas MDT setup.
- It is possible (though not often used) for a police officer to
- communicate with a water control facility computer located in another
- state from his car through the municipal computer system. Dallas is
- currently spending more for the electronics in a car (radar, cellular
- phone, radio for automatic vehicle locator, data radio for MDT and
- voice radio) than they spend for the car.
-
- I priced out an MDT system for a three car university campus
- safety department. Basic cost for a terminal and radio is $3000/car
- and the central computer that communicates with up to fifteen cars is
- about $45,000.
-
- Anyway, I got a bit long winded and it doesn't deal much with
- telecom issues but its one of my areas of interest.
-
- BTW, the manufacturers rep yold me that L.A. County bought 1200
- or MDT's and the New York City Fire Department and EMS plan on having
- all of their vehicles equipped with MDT's within a couple of years and
- all of their dispatching will take place over them.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 0:00:00 EST
- Subject: Problems With NXX-0000 Type Numbers
-
-
- In-Reply-To: gtolar@pro-europa.cts.com
-
- >Speaking of easy phone numbers, just exactly how do you get them?
-
- Bell Canada will provide "premium" telephone numbers to both residence
- and business customers, for an initial fee of about $25 and a
- continuing monthly fee.
-
- This service is relatively recent (within the past two years).
-
- One non-profit organization that closed its Toronto office for a few
- months and then asked for its old telephone number back was hit with
- Bell's charge for a "premium" telephone number. I didn't think there
- was anything "premium" about (416) 974-9420, so I suggested to the
- organization's one Toronto employee that he dispute the charge with
- Bell. I don't know what happened afterwards.
-
-
- Nigel Allen telephone (416) 535-8916
- 52 Manchester Avenue fax (416) 978-7552
- Toronto, Ontario M6G 1V3
-
- MaS Relayer v1.00.00
- Message gatewayed by MaS Network Software and Consulting/HST
- Internet: nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- UUCP: ...tmsoft!masnet!f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org!nigel.allen
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: 10XXX Bugs
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 23:46:34 EDT
- From: woody <contact!djcl@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- During a recent trip to Buffalo, I made the following observations:
-
- 1) Dialing 10XXX + 1 700 555.4141 generally didn't work too well.
- For instance, 10333 (Sprint) or 10222 (MCI) + 1 700 555.4141 got
- AT&T's long distance network recording. 10555 (Telesphere) just
- got a fast busy signal.
-
- 2) You can't dial 10222 + 1 800 888.1800, which is supposed to be one
- of MCI's numbers! (Presumably, 1 + 800 888.1800 should do it).
- Of course, mixing and matching various 10XXX on 800 number calls
- would only get the recording that the number could not be dialed
- with the selected carrier.
-
- 3) At least the 10555 0# worked to get a Telesphere operator...
-
-
- djcl@contact.uucp David Leibold
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #377
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa19826;
- 23 May 90 6:58 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa13505;
- 23 May 90 3:43 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa09718;
- 23 May 90 2:38 CDT
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 1:57:22 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #375
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005230157.ab01146@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 23 May 90 01:57:05 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 375
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media [Marc T. Kaufman]
- Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media [Bob Sutterfield]
- Re: Data Access Lines [John Higdon]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Chip Rosenthal]
- Re: Online CCITT Standards [Rob Warnock]
- Re: Connection of a British Phone Outside Britain [Herman Silbiger]
- Re: Volume Control on Public Phones [Paul Colley]
- Re: Volume Control on Public Phones [Carl Moore]
- Re: Volume Control on Public Phones [Mark Brader]
- Re: Measured Service [John Higdon]
- Re: Non-Cellular Mobile Phones [John Higdon]
- Re: Non-Cellular Mobile Phones [Russ Kepler]
- Re: New Sprint Promotion [Javier Henderson]
- Re: I Want To Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Carl Moore]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: "Marc T. Kaufman" <kaufman@neon.stanford.edu>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media
- Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 06:35:17 GMT
-
-
- In article <8069@accuvax.nwu.edu> Tom Neff <tneff%bfmny0@uunet.uu.net>
- writes:
-
- - ...No matter what
- -the subject is, if you are an expert and you read the newspaper you
- -groan. Newspapers ALWAYS get the details wrong, because it's
- -impossible to be infallible in fifty things at once, on deadline, at
- -reporters' pay.
-
- I believe it was Mark Twain (who is always filed under "C" in the
- public library, along with Lewis Carroll) who noted that Newspapers
- are 100% accurate -- except in those few instances where you know what
- really happened.
-
-
- Marc Kaufman (kaufman@Neon.stanford.edu)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Bob Sutterfield <bob@morningstar.com>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology and the Media
- Reply-To: Bob Sutterfield <bob@morningstar.com>
- Organization: Morning Star Technologies
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 14:03:55 GMT
-
-
- In article <8066@accuvax.nwu.edu> jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (j. eric
- townsend) writes:
-
- >If you are asked to give an interview on say, PBX security, offer
- >to review the reporter's story before they submit it.
-
- In connection with the times I sat for interviews regarding the
- Internet Worm, I always offered just such a service. Almost
- uniformly, the response was a semi-hostile glare followed by "our
- editors have a policy of not allowing our stories to be censored."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Date: 22 May 90 02:52:39 PDT (Tue)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Jeremy Grodberg <jgro@apldbio.com> writes:
-
- > I asked Pacific Bell to send me information about Data Access lines,
-
- I haven't the foggiest concerning a dBrnCO, but I will tell you that
- you might want to consider trying your future 9600 bps modems over
- ordinary lines before you shell out for Data Access Lines. In the
- crowd that I hang out in, there are many, many Trailblazers
- functioning just fine on standard run-of-the-mill residence and
- business lines, with throughputs approaching the theoretical limits
- for the modems. Any slight increase would most likely not pay the
- additional freight for the line.
-
- The Data Access Line is just like the new way of handling PBX trunks.
- Used to be that when you ordered a PBX trunk, they guaranteed it would
- meet spec and did whatever conditioning was necessary to achieve it.
- Now they offer two grades: Premium and Standard. Standard costs what
- they have always cost but there are no guarantees: you get what you
- get. Premium is what they used to provide but, you guessed it, comes
- at a premium price, well over and above what a trunk used to cost.
-
- The long and the short of it is: if you are anywhere near the CO,
- don't bother with a Data Access Line.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Chip Rosenthal <chip@chinacat.unicom.com>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 22 May 90 19:07:32 GMT
- Organization: Unicom Systems Development, Austin, TX
-
-
- >One of their "big" products was ADPCM T-1 multiplexers, which they
- >sold to the long-distance carriers for equal-access expansion. [...]
- >While not affecting voice very much, it really killed modem traffic.
-
- Hmmm... I'd suspect the ADPCM implementation. I know those guys did
- their own. Was it fully G.721 complaint? V22.bis and lower runs just
- fine with ADPCM. The original G.721 did have problems, but the final
- version works. Note that you can have 32K voice compression without
- meeting the spec, which might compress voice just fine but trash modem
- traffic. (The problem was that the CCITT released a G.721 with
- problems on modems, the ANSI T1Y1 committee fixed it, and CCITT
- revised G.721 with the new algorithm.)
-
-
- Chip Rosenthal | You aren't some icon carved out
- chip@chinacat.Unicom.COM | of soap, sent down here to clean
- Unicom Systems Development, 512-482-8260 | up my reputation. -John Hiatt
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 08:02:12 GMT
- From: Rob Warnock <rpw3%rigden.wpd@sgi.com>
- Subject: Re: Online CCITT Standards
- Reply-To: Rob Warnock <rpw3@sgi.com>
- Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc., Mountain View, CA
-
-
- In article <7850@accuvax.nwu.edu> MCL9337@tamvenus.bitnet writes:
-
- | This request has been made by myself and others with no results. Are
- | there absolutely NO FTPable CCITT standards? Someone somewhere must
- | know! It's a quest...
-
- Such a thing would be illegal. The CCITT (and ANSI and IEEE) standards
- are copyrighted, and the standards organizations are largely supported
- through the sales of their standards documents. They would disappove
- strongly of anyone typing in one of their docs and putting it online.
-
- CCITT/ISO/IEEE/ANSI != RFC. (Too bad.)
-
- It is often the case that *draft* standards are available for free
- (hardcopy only) while the standard is being developed... But once the
- standard is finalized, you can't get the drafts (at any price).
-
-
- Rob Warnock, MS-9U/510 rpw3@sgi.com rpw3@pei.com
- Silicon Graphics, Inc. (415)335-1673 Protocol Engines, Inc.
- 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd.
- Mountain View, CA 94039-7311
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 20:30:25 EDT
- From: hrs1@cbnewsi.att.com
- Subject: Re: Connection of a British Phone Outside Britain
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- In article <7743@accuvax.nwu.edu>, julian@bongo.uucp (Julian Macassey)
- writes:
-
- > the phone in, flip the leads. Note that UK phones are what is known in
- > the US as "Quarter Modular". In other words, the line cord is hard
- > wired into the phone and has a jack plug only on the one end. So to
-
- This does not seem to be true any more. I have a British phone, which
- had modular plugs at both ends. It looked like it was hard wired into
- the telephone end, but when I took the cover off, there was a modular
- plug inside. It took me a while to figure out that 2 and 5 were tip &
- ring, not 3 and 4!
-
-
- Herman Silbiger
- hrs1@cbnewsi.ATT.COM
- attmail!hsilbiger
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: pacolley@violet.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Colley)
- Subject: Re: Volume Control on Public Phones
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 19:10:49 GMT
-
-
- In article <8089@accuvax.nwu.edu> roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
- writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 374, Message 4 of 9
-
- >I saw something this morning I've never seen before. In a pay phone
- >at a service area on the NJ Turnpike, there was a button to press to
- >adjust the volume (each press makes is louder). Has anybody ever seen
- >one of these before? It looked like a standard AT&T coin phone in a
- >booth.
-
- Phones with volume controls are fairly common here in Ontario, and
- have been around for a few years.
-
- Most areas which have more than two or three pay phones have one with
- a volume control. The phones are marked with a sign above the phone
- (a stylized white ear on a blue background).
-
- They seem identical to a normal pay phone, except for a sort of a
- rocker switch in the handset. Holding one side of the switch
- progressively increases the volume, the other side decreases it.
-
- Such groups of pay phones also usually have one phone at wheelchair
- height.
-
- I've seen a similar arrangement on an otherwise normal rotary phone at
- my Aunt's apartment (she is hard of hearing). I don't know if it is
- supplied by the phone company.
-
-
- Paul Colley
- Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo
- Waterloo, Canada
- pacolley@violet.waterloo.edu or .ca
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 10:10:52 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Re: Volume Control on Public Phones
-
-
- I think I've seen such adjustable-volume phones many times.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Mark Brader <msb@sq.com>
- Subject: Volume Control on Public Phones
- Date: Wed, 23 May 1990 00:14:43 -0400
-
-
- > I saw something this morning I've never seen before. In a pay phone
- > at a service area on the NJ Turnpike, there was a button to press to
- > adjust the volume (each press makes it louder).
-
- There are a fair number of these at busy payphone locations, such as
- main subway stations, here in Toronto. You're only supposed to need
- to use the adjustment if you have impaired hearing.
-
-
- Mark Brader, SoftQuad Inc., Toronto "Email isn't worth the paper it's
- utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com printed on" -- Brian T. Schellenberger
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Measured Service
- Date: 22 May 90 02:30:32 PDT (Tue)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Carol Springs <#axiom!carols@drilex.dri.mgh.com> writes:
-
- > The rationale seems to be that measured service
- > in Massachusetts exists as a lifeline service for those who can't pay
- > the higher phone rates, and if you can afford one flat rate line in
- > your household you obviously aren't in this category.
-
- I'll never bad-mouth the California "lifeline" service ever again, if
- that is what makes it so we can still have a mix of measured and
- unmeasured lines in one household. In the residence world, unmeasured
- is referred to as "premium" service, measured is referred to as
- "standard" service, and lifeline is, of course, lifeline. While
- lifeline is a form of measured service, it is different than
- "standard" in that you get an "untimed" Zone 1 call allowance. In
- regular measured services, all calls are timed. In any event, I have five
- unmeasured, four measured and one Inwats in one residence.
-
- Lang Zerner <langz@eng.sun.com> writes:
-
- > Huh? I've got a *hunt group* whose primary line is flat rate and
- > whose remaining lines are measured.
-
- In Pac*Bell land, the only two firm requirements for hunting are that
- the numbers bear the same prefix and that the lines are billed to the
- same party. Other than that it's anything goes. Of course some
- mechanical offices (of which there are plenty in Backward*Bell land)
- have other restrictions concerning jumping over other numbers,
- backwards, etc.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Non-Cellular Mobile Phones
- Date: 22 May 90 02:41:27 PDT (Tue)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- David Barts <davidb@pacer.com> writes:
-
- > Fascinating! Two
- > *giant* cells, each covering several thousand square miles! Five or
- > six such cells would cover the Rio Grande Valley from the Texas border
- > to Colorado.
-
- > So anyplace can have cellular phones; just make the cells big enough
- > so that each cell has enough customers to support it.
-
- Not to detract from your utter amazement, but I do believe that was
- the original concept of cellular. To wit: in areas with few users the
- cells would be large (maybe even huge). As the density increased, then
- more channels would be required. To get these, the cells would become
- smaller and the channels reused more frequently.
-
- This is why the system has control over the mobile's power output: if
- the mobile is transmitting only the power necessary to reach the cell
- site that it is working, the chances of interfering with other cells
- is minimized. This is why also that you will find metropolitan systems
- adding cell sites: in order to get more channels as the number of
- subscribers increases.
-
- What you have described to us is the other end of the spectrum. Most
- of us see the congestion in metro areas, but don't get to see how the
- other side of the coin is.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Russ Kepler <bbx!russ@unmvax.cs.unm.edu>
- Subject: Re: Non-Cellular Mobile Phones
- Date: 22 May 90 13:40:48 GMT
- Reply-To: russ@bbx.UUCP (Russ Kepler)
- Organization: BASIS International, Albuquerque NM
-
-
- In article <8080@accuvax.nwu.edu> davidb@pacer.com (David Barts) writes:
-
- >[talks about person in New Mexico making cellular call 30 mi
- >from the nearest city]
-
- >Now this was several years ago, so its possible the situation is
- >changed by now. I wouldn't be surprised if they've had to do
- >something to split Albuquerque into several cells instead of being
- >served by the same Sandia Peak `mega-cell' the rest of central NM was
- >(is?) served by. It is also possible that the phone wasn't cellular
- >but IMTS. I know from the antenna that it was definitely not a VHF
- >radiophone.
-
- Still the same. I regularly make calls using a handheld (still want
- to call it a handy talkie...) from up to 100 mi away. Just so long as
- you can hit Sandia Crest. I've always had an urge to try from
- Flagstaff - I used to hit the two meter repeater from there and think
- I could probably hit the cell given a little power boost. I've never
- gone into roam so I must be missing Santa Fe. We have employees that
- use the cellular from Gallup (90 mi west), avoiding the LD charges.
-
- It's possible that they've split Albuquerque into multiple cells. But
- I don't think that this precludes a wide area coverage and local area
- coverage, cells shouldn't have to be physically adjacent and one
- should be able to be 'surrounded' by another.
-
- Side note of historical interest:
-
- Around here it's normal to think in terms of line-of-sight. When I
- was in high school I did a bit of a summer job providing
- communications for a Boy Scout Camp in Chimayo (north of Santa Fe twenty
- miles of so). The communications were done using a handy talkie the
- size of a cinder block that I recharged from my car. I used an
- extension full wave antenna and hit the repeater eighty miles south every
- time. From there it was a phone patch - Albuquerque local calls from
- up north. Unfortunately there wasn't a repeater with phone patch in
- Santa Fe so we couldn't make 'local' calls.
-
-
- Russ Kepler - Basis Int'l SNAIL: 5901 Jefferson NE, Albuquerque, NM 87109
- UUCP: bbx.basis.com!russ PHONE: 505-345-5232
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: henderson@hamavnet.com
- Subject: Re: New Sprint Promotion
- Date: 21 May 90 17:37:55 GMT
- Organization: Hamilton Avnet Computer; Culver City, CA
-
-
- > 1. "One month" means one "average" month, meaning:
- > 2. you won't see any kind of refund until your third bill
- > (at least).
-
- I received a flyer back in October '89 with a similar offer, and the
- conditions were that a 'free month' would be a $25 credit to be
- applied to the January '90 bill (which they did).
-
- So far, looks like the same kind of promo.
-
-
- Javier Henderson | crash!simpact!hamavnet!henderson | These opinions
- Engineering Services | Ham Packet: N6VBG @ KD7XG-1 | are all mine.
- Hamilton Avnet | WWIVNet: 1@2397 |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 10:59:31 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
-
-
- Isn't dialing 0+citycode within your own city code permitted in the
- U.K.? (That leading 0 is not used on incoming international calls.)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #375
- ******************************
-
- ISSUES 376 AND 377 APPEAR AHEAD OF 375 DUE TO REVERSAL IN
- TRANSMISSION. ISSUE 378 IS NEXT.
-
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa07105;
- 24 May 90 0:25 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa06243;
- 23 May 90 22:57 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa28068;
- 23 May 90 21:52 CDT
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 20:54:37 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #378
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005232054.ab01651@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 23 May 90 20:54:01 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 378
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Len Rose Posts His Status [Len Rose, via psrc@pegasus.att.com]
- Looking For Telephone Equipment Retailers [Daniel M. Rosenberg]
- Telephone Directory Database on CD-ROM [Nigel Allen]
- Toll Switching Centers for Area Code 809 [Nigel Allen]
- ESS Historical Note [Mark Baker]
- NN0-style NPAs and Order of Assignment [David Leibold]
- AT&T Having Second Thoughts? [Don H. Kemp]
- His Master's Voice [Andy Behrens]
- Censorship? (was Re: Telephones, Technology and Media [J. Eric Townsend]
- Light Guidance Transmission Systems [Ken McVay]
- Correction to 908 Areacode Exchange List [Tom Lowe]
- Distinctive Ringing Recognition [Dave Burke]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 23:23 EDT
- From: psrc@pegasus.att.com
- Subject: Len Rose Posts His Status
-
-
- I picked this up in some groups that discuss AT&T 3B2 systems, and
- thought it might be of interest to Telecom readers. Paul
-
- From: len@eci.UUCP (Len Rose)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,u3b.misc
- Subject: It's Official
- Date: 21 May 90 04:18:54 GMT
- Reply-To: len@eci.UUCP (Len Rose,Netsys)
- Organization: Netsys in Exile..
-
- Hi All.
-
- I am now indicted with five felony counts. I even made the front page of
- the Baltimore papers. Should anyone wish to call and hear the true story,
- rather than what the US Attorney said in his Press Conference, I will be
- glad to relate it. Meanwhile, still no netsys.com .. (they still have my
- stuff)
-
- Sorry for all the committments I have been unable to fulfill. I will be back
- soon with more delightful tales (who knows, If Clifford Stoll can
- write one, so can I).. The truth shall be told.
-
- Len
-
- len@netsys.com (now in hands of the S.S.)
-
- PS.. have laptop will travel (or rather communicate)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Daniel M. Rosenberg" <dmr@csli.stanford.edu>
- Subject: Looking For Telephone Equipment Retailers
- Date: 22 May 90 07:37:19 GMT
- Organization: KZSU, Stanford -- "Radio At Fault"
-
-
- I'm sort of a budding do-it-yourselfer, but am having trouble ordering
- the following equipment:
-
- o Butt set. Not some crufty, light plastic piece o' crud
- "test set." I want a butt set. I want to be able to drop
- it from the top of a telephone pole someday and have it
- remain whole.
-
- o One of them little boxes that puts a tone across a pair.
-
- o a #415 (or so?) punchdown tool
-
- o a place to find a cheap Panasonic or similar PBX or key
- system to install in a house I'm going to live in.
-
- Hello Direct doesn't really have the stuff. Graybar in San Jose,
- whoever they are, won't sell to me, because I don't have a "California
- Reseller Certificate."
-
- Patrick (or someone) posted the catalog of a mail order place in
- Florida a while back, and I ordered their catalog -- and am still
- waiting.
-
- So, does anyone have a list of retail equipment catalogs, or 800
- numbers, or anything?
-
-
- # Daniel M. Rosenberg // Stanford CSLI // Eat my opinions, not Stanford's.
- # dmr@csli.stanford.edu // decwrl!csli!dmr // dmr%csli@stanford.bitnet
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 0:00:00 EST
- Subject: Telephone Directory Database on CD-ROM
-
-
- Bell Canada's directory subsidiary, Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc.,
- markets a telephone directory database for Ontario and Quebec
- provinces on CD-ROM. According to the ad I saw, "It's versatile --
- you can search by name, address, telephone or postal code. And it's
- fast and easy to use -- the average search takes only seconds."
-
- No price was quoted in the ad, but if you would like more information,
- please contact:
-
- Info-Direct
- Tele-Direct (Publications) Inc.
- 55 Town Centre Court, Suite 502
- Scarborough, Ontario
- Canada M1P 4X5
- telephone (416) 296-4488
-
- On a related topic, Northern Telecom has put the manuals for the
- DMS-100 switch on CD-ROM. This isn't news; I think it happened a year
- or two ago. I'm not sure how often the CR-ROM is updated.
-
- The Forgotten Rebels album "Surfin' on Heroin" is available on CD, but
- this is probably not of great interest to most Telecom Digest readers.
- "The Party is the Most Precious Thing" by the Canadian Cultural
- Workers Committee is not available on CD, and in all probability never
- will be.
-
-
- MaS Relayer v1.00.00
- Message gatewayed by MaS Network Software and Consulting/HST
- Internet: nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- UUCP: ...tmsoft!masnet!f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org!nigel.allen
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- Date: Fri, 18 May 90 7:00:00 EST
- Subject: Toll Switching Centers for Area Code 809
-
-
- I think -- based on two call attempts this morning -- that directory
- assistance calls from Canada to area code 809 points are handled in
- the Caribbean countries themselves.
-
- I just dialled zero in Toronto and asked for directory assistance for
- the Cayman Islands. The Toronto operator then connected me with
- another operator (male, standard North American accent), and announced
- "it's Canada calling, a customer on the line for numbers only". I'm
- not sure, but it may have been a satellite circuit. In case anyone is
- interested, the phone number of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
- in Grand Cayman is (809) 949-8666.
-
- I also tried for a Jamaica number, but Jamaica directory assistance
- wasn't answering (within eight rings), so my operator said to try
- again later.
-
- On a related topic: I understand that an AT&T international operator
- center in the southern U.S. was closed in the last few years. (Does
- Jacksonville sound right?) Did this handle operator-assisted traffic
- to the Caribbean?
-
-
- Nigel Allen voice: (416) 535-8916
- 52 Manchester Avenue fax: (416) 978-7552
- Toronto, Ontario M6G 1V3
-
- MaS Relayer v1.00.00
- Message gatewayed by MaS Network Software and Consulting/HST
- Internet: nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- UUCP: ...tmsoft!masnet!f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org!nigel.allen
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: mcb@ihlpf.att.com
- Date: 22 May 1990 7:54-EST
- Subject: ESS Historical Note
-
-
- Historical Note:
-
- Wednesday, May 30, 1990 is the 25th anniversary of the cutover of the
- first No. 1 Electronic Switching System (ESS)* in Succasunna, New
- Jersey.
-
- At 12:01 a.m. on Sunday, May 30, 1965, 4,300 customers in Succasunna,
- New Jersey were receiving dial tone from a computer controlled
- switching system. These customers now had available to them such
- features as: add-on (three-way calling), abbreviated dialing (speed
- calling), and temporary transfer (call forwarding). 1 ESS also
- provided for a more flexible assignment of directory numbers to
- physical line pairs and a more flexible assignment of business
- features such as hunting or extension dialing than did
- electromechanical switches.
-
- Over 300 1 ESS switches, including Succasunna, are still is service
- around the country. Many of the other hundreds of 1 ESS switches that
- were in service have either been replaced by digital switching systems
- or upgraded to a 1A ESS switching system.
-
- For fairly detailed technical information regarding 1 ESS, read:
-
- The Bell System Technical Journal, September 1964
- (2 part issue devoted to 1 ESS)
-
- Bell Laboratories Record, June 1965
- (issue devoted to 1 ESS)
-
- Electronics magazine, October 19, 1964, pp 72-86.
-
- The Bell System Technical Journal, February 1977
- (issue devoted to the 1A processor for 1A ESS and 4 ESS)
-
- * Electronic Switching System is a trademark of AT&T
-
-
- Mark Baker
- AT&T Network Systems
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: NN0-style NPAs and Order of Assignment
- Date: Mon, 21 May 90 23:52:06 EDT
- From: woody <contact!djcl@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- I got hold of the list of NN0-type NPAs which are supposed to be put
- into service once the normal NPAs run out. They are (left to right,
- then down):
-
- 260 480 520 590 650 220 250 490 660 680 720 730 850 940
- 230 240 290 470 550 580 740 930 450 760 880 570 380 460
- 980 860 960 990 970# 350 540 820 840 690 770 890 320 370
- 790 280 640 750 270 430 630 670 560 330 340 390 620 830
- 920 360 440 780 870 420 530
-
- 970# - reserved for plant testing exchange/area code
- 950 - used for carrier access - don't know where it will fit in in
- the ordering of the new NPAs, if it will be assigned at all
-
- I wonder how Bellcore ever arrived at the ordering of these NPA's and
- why. One possible rule would be to assign different first digits for
- each subsequent NPA so as to avoid confusion, but this wouldn't
- explain how 730 follows 720 for instance.
-
- It appears that this ordering was in place for the last 15 years or
- more, considering that it was mentioned as far back as Notes on
- Distance Dialing (1975).
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: AT&T Having Second Thoughts?
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 12:06:04 EDT
- From: Don H Kemp <dhk@teletech.uucp>
-
-
- Looks like AT&T might have opened Pandora's Box...
-
- AT&T NEWS BRIEFS (From AT&T's Consultant Liason Program)
-
- Monday, May 21, 1990
-
-
- AGGREGATION AGGRAVATION -- ... To cut business long-distance bills
- by up to 20 percent, [Gerald Pfleger's] Mid-Com Inc. and ... other
- companies have latched onto a controversial technique known as
- call aggregation [in which] the phone traffic of many unrelated
- businesses [is combined to] ... qualify for the maximum discounts
- that AT&T and other carriers give to their biggest customers.
- Although aggregation began less than two years ago, it is already
- slicing rates on 3 percent of U.S. long-distance traffic. ... AT&T
- at first looked fairly kindly on aggregators. They were seen as a
- cheap way to augment AT&T Business Communications Services. ...
- Now, alarmed by the rapid growth of aggregation ... [AT&T] is
- trying to rein in the aggregators. ... [It] named Michael Keith
- director of distribution strategy and alternate channels and told
- him to get tough on aggregators. He cut back all joint marketing
- programs and ended marketing efforts with companies that aggregate
- SDN, which requires costly programming by AT&T. ... AT&T could get
- tougher. ... The FCC is debating whether the company should still
- be considered the dominant carrier. If that changes, aggregators
- could suffer. ... They subsist on fleeting price discrepancies,
- Keith contends. "One move to the left, and they're all gone," he
- says. ... [Pfleger says] AT&T can't limit aggregation too much
- without offending customers. ... AT&T's Keith says there's some
- truth to that. ... Business Week, p. 101, 5/28.
-
-
- Don H Kemp "Always listen to experts. They'll
- B B & K Associates, Inc. tell you what can't be done, and
- Rutland, VT why. Then do it."
- uunet!uvm-gen!teletech!dhk Lazarus Long
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Andy Behrens <andyb@coat.com>
- Subject: His Master's Voice
- Date: 22 May 90 18:25:15 GMT
- Reply-To: andyb@coat.com
- Organization: Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse
-
-
- From a bill insert sent to customers of Illinois Bell, as quoted in
- "Spy" Magazine.
-
- WHEN YOUR PET'S ALONE, PICK UP THE PHONE AND CALL
-
- If you're like a lot of other pet owners, you probably wonder
- how your pet is getting along when you're at work. There's no way
- to tell for sure, of course, but there is a way you can communicate.
- All you need is an answering machine. ... Just dial your home
- number and let it ring until your answering machine picks up the
- call. Listen for the beep and then start talking. You can address
- your pet by name, just as you would if you were at home. It really
- doesn't matter what you say after that, because it's the sound of
- your voice your pet appreciates the most. ... Remember to turn up
- the volume a little on your answering machine, so your pet can hear
- you.
-
- Andy Behrens, Burlington Coat Factory
-
- [Moderator's Note: Andy and/or the magazine are NOT making this up.
- The above was in the April, 1990 issue of {Telebriefs}, the little
- tract Illinois Bell includes with the bills each month. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 18:10:28 CDT
- From: "j. eric townsend" <jet@karazm.math.uh.edu>
- Subject: Censorship? (was Re: Telephones, Technology and Media
- Organization: University of Houston -- Department of Mathematics
-
-
- In article <8120@accuvax.nwu.edu> somebody wrote:
-
- >In article <8066@accuvax.nwu.edu> jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (j. eric
- >townsend) writes:
- >>If you are asked to give an interview on say, PBX security, offer
- >>to review the reporter's story before they submit it.
-
- >In connection with the times I sat for interviews regarding the
- >Internet Worm, I always offered just such a service. Almost
- >uniformly, the response was a semi-hostile glare followed by "our
- >editors have a policy of not allowing our stories to be censored."
-
- 1. Explain to them that you don't want to censor the story, but make
- sure the facts are correct.
-
- 2. Call the reporter's editor, and explain the situation to them.
- Something like: "It's not the tone or point of view I'm worried about;
- it's the facts regarding the technology. I want to insure that you
- represent the technology correctly in your story."
-
- Any editor who calls this "story censorship" should probably be fired...
-
-
- J. Eric Townsend -- University of Houston Dept. of Mathematics (713) 749-2120
- Internet: jet@uh.edu
- Bitnet: jet@UHOU
- Skate UNIX(r).
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: kmcvay@oneb.UUCP (Ken McVay)
- Subject: Light Guidance Transmission Systems
- Date: 22 May 90 19:20:45 GMT
-
-
- British Columbia Telephone, our provincial carrier, recently completed
- their end of the cross-Canada fibre-optic network. They spent a great
- deal of cash while they were building the system to describe the
- benefits to their customers.
-
- In general, I understand that capability and service will improve due
- to the decreased noise levels and increased capacity, but I'd
- appreciate some knowledgable discussion about the technical
- aspects/advantages of fibre-optics from the folks working with the
- technology.
-
- Clearly, we can expect improved facsimile performance, ditto other
- types of modems, cleaner voice calls, etc. but isn't it likely that
- the improved technology will of itself generate _new_ technology? I.E.
- aren't we going to see that "extra capacity" put to work almost
- immediately, as r&d produces new toys to take advantage of it?
-
- If so, what might we expect?
-
- How much advantage will be seen in the hinterlands, which still rely
- on old, outdated technology to deliver their traffic?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Correction to 908 Areacode Exchange List
- Date: 22 May 90 22:24:36 EDT (Tue)
- From: Tom Lowe <tel@cdsdb1.att.com>
-
-
- An observant reader pointed out two missing exchanges in the 908 area
- code list I recently posted to the Digest. I also checked my list
- against a list that NJ Bell inserted in the latest phone bills which I
- received yesterday and found another missing exchange.
-
- Please add the following to your lists.
-
- 244 TOMS RIVER NJ
- 245 ROSELLE NJ
- 841 STROUDSBG NJ
-
- Sorry for the missing entries! If I have still missed any entries,
- kindly let me know and I will fix the list and check my eyes!
-
-
- Tom Lowe
- tel@cdsdb1.ATT.COM
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 23 May 90 07:53:00 EDT
- From: "VAXB::DBURKE" <dburke%vaxb.decnet@nusc-npt.navy.mil>
- Subject: Distinctive Ringing Recognition
-
-
- Hi,
- NYNEX (or NET) has just release something called RingMate (I
- assume trademarked). This allows me to have two different incoming
- telephone numbers, one for me and one for the kids, all tied to the
- same telephones I have now, with a distinctive ringing feature to
- allow me to recognize which number is being called. This is a nice
- feature, except I'd like to get a black box that will switch to
- answering machine A for me and answering machine B for the kids.
-
- Is there such a box?
-
- The tone pattern is standard ring for my regular line, and two longs
- for the kiddie line.
-
-
- (PS - from what I understand, this is a very limited availability service).
-
- Thanks,
-
- Dave Burke
- dburke%vaxb.decnet@nusc-npt.navy.mil
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Illinois Bell, among other Bell telcos, offers this
- service in a limited number of areas. Our version allows two or three
- other numbers to be camped on the main line. In the promotional
- literature from IBT is a caveat that '....answering machines or
- services will probably be unable to distinquish one call from
- another...' PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #378
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa10674;
- 24 May 90 1:52 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab06243;
- 23 May 90 22:59 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab28068;
- 23 May 90 21:53 CDT
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 21:45:32 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #379
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005232145.ab16416@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 23 May 90 21:44:57 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 379
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Yemen & Yemen [Dolf Grunbauer]
- Interesting East Berlin Phone Number [Bob Goudreau]
- Joined Countries [Dave Esan]
- Choosing no Long Distance Carrier (was: I Have no LDC) [Brian Litzinger]
- Remote Location Telephone Service [Joseph Szewczak]
- Facsimile Over 32K Voice Lines [Tom Neiss]
- Cordless Telephone Dies [HAMER524@ruby.vcu.edu]
- Getting the Phone Number You Want [M.G. Stinnett]
- Re: Drug Dealers and Caller ID [Eric Black]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Ge' Weijers]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Jim Gottlieb]
- Re: 10XXX Bugs [Carl Moore]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Organization: Philips Information Systems, P.O. Box 245,
- Subject: Yemen & Yemen
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 13:51:32 MET
- From: Dolf Grunbauer <dolf@idca.tds.philips.nl>
-
-
- Patrick,
-
- I heard on the news that the Arab Republic of Yemen (country code:
- 967) and the Peoples Democratic Republic of Yemen (country code: 969)
- reunited on the 22nd of May 1990. Do you know which country code they
- are going to use or will they keep both country codes ?
-
-
- Dolf Grunbauer Tel: +31 55 433233 Internet dolf@idca.tds.philips.nl
- Philips Information Systems UUCP ...!mcsun!philapd!dolf
- Dept. BS Software, P.O. Box 245, 7300 AE Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 12:15:53 edt
- From: Bob Goudreau <goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com>
- Subject: Interesting East Berlin Phone Number
- Reply-To: goudreau@larrybud.rtp.dg.com (Bob Goudreau)
- Organization: Data General Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC
-
-
- There's an interesting ad by Salomon Brothers (an American investment
- bank) in the most recent issue of the _Economist_:
-
-
- OPEN FOR BUSINESS
-
- We're very pleased to announce the opening of our office
- in East Berlin.
- ...
- If you are considering doing business in Eastern Europe,
- call Salomon Brothers in East Berlin at 49-161-2610935.
-
-
- Note the telephone number: 49 is the country code of *West* Germany,
- not East Germany (which is +37).
-
- I've consulted my _AT&T_International_Dialing_Directory_, and 161 does
- not appear as an area code in either Germany. (West Berlin is +49-30;
- East Berlin is +37-2). In fact, it appears that no codes in either
- country begin with the digit 1.
-
- Do any of our German readers out there in telecom land know what's
- going on here? My guess is that it's one of the following two
- scenarios:
-
- 1) With German monetary union and German political union just around
- the corner, German telephonic union has already been reached, and
- parts (or all) of East Germany have been assigned West German
- area codes.
-
- 2) The "161" is just a special West German dialing prefix that is
- used to reach East German numbers, similar to the Britain/Ireland
- or US/Mexico shortcuts. The actual phone number cited above is
- thus probably +37-2-610935.
-
- Given that no area codes currently begin with "1", I'm inclined to
- speculate that "1" is a prefix for special services in Germany, which
- makes the second scenario the more plausible. Is this the case?
-
-
- Bob Goudreau +1 919 248 6231
- Data General Corporation
- 62 Alexander Drive goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com
- Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 ...!mcnc!rti!xyzzy!goudreau
- USA
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dave Esan <moscom!de@cs.rochester.edu>
- Subject: Joined Countries
- Date: 23 May 90 15:06:56 GMT
- Organization: Moscom Corp., E. Rochester, NY
-
-
- The Yemen Arab Republic (country code 967) and the People's Democratic
- Republic of Yemen (country code 969) announced recently that they will
- merge and form a new country called (surprise) Yemen.
-
- Has anyone heard or thought of what will happen to the country codes?
- Will they merge into one, or will the North still be 967 and the south
- be 969?
-
- When Tanganika (255) merged with Zanzibar (259) to form Tanzania they
- kept both country codes. Of course, Zanzibar, an island, is
- physically removed from what was Tanganika.
-
- Does anyone know the intentions of the soon to be united Germanys in
- regard to dialling patterns to what is presently East Germany (DDR),
- and which will soon be part of a single Germany?
-
- Thanks.
-
- --> David Esan {rutgers, ames, harvard}!rochester!moscom!de
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Brian Litzinger <brian@apt.bungi.com>
- Subject: Choosing No Long Distance Carrier (was: I Have no LDC)
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 0:10:52 PDT
-
-
- My original posting was about my having stumbled onto not having a
- default long distance carrier. By 'stumbled' I mean that I had a
- default long distance carrier and through what I consider no effort on
- my part I no longer have one. Just happened one day.
-
- Several people responded that having no default long distance carrier
- can happen in the normal course of business. I.E. you just ask for no
- long distance carrier.
-
- Well, the PacBell representative I spoke with disagrees. He said that
- I must choose a default long distance carrier. He even showed my the
- form he was filling out, and under long distance carriers was: AT&T,
- MCI, Sprint ... However, None, was nowhere to be found. There wasn't
- even a blank line or other field.
-
- I suspect that if I had pushed the point and talked to a supervisor I
- could have gotten my wish. But selecting 'None' for a long distance
- carrier is definitely not as easy as "Just Say No" (at least where I
- live).
-
-
- <> Brian Litzinger @ APT Technology Inc., San Jose, CA
- <> brian@apt.bungi.com {apple,sun,pyramid}!daver!apt!brian
- <> VOICE: 408 377 9950 FAX: 408 377 0374
- <> Disclaimer: Above are my opinions and probably wrong.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 07:52:38 EDT
- From: Joseph Szewczak <ME301007@brownvm.brown.edu>
- Subject: Remote Location Telephone Service
-
-
- Would you please refer this request for information to the appropriate
- place or person:
-
- Deep Springs College, a small (24 students) and unique academic
- institution located on the CA-NV border is seeking to improve its
- present telephone service. The college is located in a remote valley
- between the Inyo and White Mtns. of CA. The present phone service
- operates by radio link and provides only one line, which is unsuitable
- for data communication. We would like to have more than one line, and
- have data capability. Stringing wires would cost $100,000 to
- $200,000. Would it be cost effective to set up a satelite link? How
- do we go about this, and who do we contact? Are there any other
- options?
-
- I welcome any suggestions, including those with a commercial
- interest in the project. Please respond to:
-
- Joe Szewczak <ME301007@brownwm.brown.edu>
-
- I will be here until the middle of July. Thank you.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 08:19:01 EST
- From: Tom Neiss <RTRN@snycenvm.bitnet>
- Subject: Facsimile Over 32K Voice Lines
- Organization: State University of New York - Central Administration
-
-
- Has anyone experienced difficulty in sending FAXES over compressed voice
- lines? If so, what was the solution?
-
-
- Tom Neiss
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 09:51 EDT
- From: HAMER524@ruby.vcu.edu
- Subject: Cordless Telephone Dies
-
- I own a Panasonic cordless phone (I forget the model number; not the
- cheapest, but probably the next cheapest). It has worked fine since I
- bought it about a year ago.
-
- Recently (about a week ago) it started behaving badly. When picked up
- from its base unit, the "low battery" light began flashing, and it
- only worked for perhaps 30 seconds before dying in a cloud of
- interfearence, and a series of clicks spaced about a half a second
- apart.
-
- On the off-chance that the nicad battery failed to charge properly, I
- reinserted it in the base unit, waited overnight, and tried again.
- Same result. On the off-chance that the nicad battery had developed a
- 'memory' problem, I disconnected the base unit, left the remote on,
- and left it overnight. When I came down the next morning, the 'low
- battery' light had ceased flashing (not enough power, I guess) but it
- was still ticking as described in the second paragraph above.
-
- 1. Any guesses?
-
- 2. How can I test the battery and/or the recharger? I own a
- multimeter, but have no idea of what the readings are supposed to be.
-
- 3. As an aside, I broke the antenna several months ago, and no local
- repair/electronic shops here carried an exact replacement. I replaced
- it with a Radio Schlock 'rubber' antenna which worked fine. But where
- in the world does one get parts, and why don't the stores that sell
- the units and repair them sell the parts?
-
- Thanks.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 18:41:57 -0500
- From: "M.G. Stinnett" <stinnett@plains.nodak.edu>
- Subject: Getting the Phone Number You Want
- Organization: North Dakota State University, Fargo
-
-
- My wife was a service rep for Northwestern Bell for nine years. She
- related the following tidbits:
-
- Getting the phone number you want: If it's available, the service rep
- can get it for you. The rep may have to do a little extra work, but
- they can find out. How do you get them to do it without charging? It
- helps a lot if you're very friendly and personable when you call. The
- best reps will know how, and may be willing to do it, but there is no
- way to guarantee it. But a cheerful voice goes a long way.
-
- The same goes for getting the line turned on quickly. Good reps know
- who to call at the board to get it done in a couple of minutes. It's
- kind of a "could you do this for me? The paperwork is on the way."
- situation. If you're friendly on the phone, the rep may do it for you.
- If you need it for a genuine reason, let the rep know. Don't lie; they
- hear enough requests to spot the genuine from the lies. But do be
- cheerful. One rep who worked with my wife received a call from a
- doctor who had just moved to a certain town in Minnesota famous for
- its medical clinic. The doctor was very gruff and demanded that the
- phone be turned on that day, because he had to be able to get calls
- from the clinic.
-
- She asked if they could contact him now. Of course, he replied; I have
- a beeper. Well then, she said, I guess you really don't need it on
- today after all, do you?
-
- Another thing to do when calling for service is to let the rep know
- exactly the nature of the service you want, even if you think you
- already know what features you need. My wife took a call from one man
- who wanted two lines with automatic transfer and a few other things.
- She asked a few questions and then suggested a system they had
- (CaroLine, I think) which had all the features he needed plus a few
- more, and which would save him over $100 a month compared to the
- system he asked for. Of course, she cost the company some revenue, but
- bought a very satisfied customer.
-
- Not all service reps will provide this level of service, or have the
- knowledge and experience to do it. But if you "feel out" the rep in
- the initial moments of the call, you might be able to tell that you're
- talking to a dud, at which point you can claim time problems and say
- you'll call back later. When you call again, chances are very good
- you'll reach another rep.
-
- By the same token, if you find one of the jewels who goes the extra
- mile, write down the name so you can ask for that rep the next time
- you call. They'll grumble if you ask for a specific rep, but if you
- preservere they'll connect you.
-
- And finally, when you do get great service, write a letter to the
- office manager (the rep will tell you where to write if you ask).
- Tell them that Mr. or Ms. Rep treated you well and left you with a
- good impression of the company. These letters are very important; with
- most service reps on a union contract, they can be one of the few
- things that get the rep a little added recognition.
-
- Of course, if the rep is a total idiot, you should write about them,
- too.
-
-
- M. G.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 11:34:59 PDT
- From: Eric Black <ericb@atherton.com>
- Subject: Re: Drug Dealers and Caller ID
-
-
- Hmmm... If drug dealers are using CID for their own nefarious
- purposes, then how long can it be before the same telcos and local
- authorities who replaced tone-dialed payphones with rotary-dialed due
- to misguided reaction to who-knows-how-much-or-little public pressure
- also make CID unavailable?
-
- How long can one sentence get and still be almost readable? :-)
-
-
- Eric Black Atherton Technology, 1333 Bordeaux Dr., Sunnyvale, CA, 94089
- Email: ericb@Atherton.COM Voice: +1 408 734 9822
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Ge' Weijers <ge@sci.kun.nl>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Date: 23 May 90 10:15:19 GMT
- Reply-To: ge@cs.kun.nl
-
-
- If the system contains sensitive (customer) information I'd write a
- letter to the state Telecom watchdog committee, or a member of the
- state legislation interested in these matters. Send a CC to the
- chairman of the company. I suppose they can't sue you for telling
- THEM. After that I'd walk away from it.
-
- The company probably deserves what it gets.
-
- kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net (Larry Lippman) writes:
- > While I am certain that there are TELECOM Digest readers who
- >will disagree with my opinion, I have absolutely *no* sympathy for your
- >predicament.
-
- > Would you walk into various offices and start looking through
- >unlocked desk drawers and filing cabinets to relieve your "boredom"?
- >I suspect not. However, why is it that people without a justifiable
- >*need* think it is "okay" to "wander about" a computer system? This
- >is really tantamount to the same act as rifling desks and filing
- >cabinets, but without the same risk of detection.
-
- Depends on what you call 'wandering about'. If you look into your
- colleagues files on such a system then you are trespassing. Checking
- or altering your mother's phone bill does not get my sympathy either.
- Checking the password file for password-less system account and the
- likes is, in your analogy, checking the locks. If I check whether all
- doors are locked in the office before I leave I'm not trespassing. I
- do not expect to be fired for that.
-
- System files are part of the locking mechanism, most are not useful in
- itself.
-
- It sounds a lot like a setup to catch intruders. Nobody is interested
- in security on this system, but they find out people 'wandering'
- about.
-
-
- Ge' Weijers Internet/UUCP: ge@cs.kun.nl
- Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, (uunet.uu.net!cs.kun.nl!ge)
- University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1
- 6525 ED Nijmegen, the Netherlands tel. +3180612483 (UTC-2)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jim Gottlieb <jimmy@denwa.info.com>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 23 May 90 18:57:55 GMT
- Reply-To: Jim Gottlieb <jimmy@denwa.info.com>
- Organization: Info Connections, West Los Angeles
-
-
- In article <8047@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- writes:
-
- >As far as I am concerned, MCI is not a real player for serious long
- >distance users. While they may have lots of "suits" running around
- >schmoozing it up to their corporate customers, the service they
- >provide is substandard to either Sprint or AT&T by an amount far
- >exceeding any discount they provide.
-
- I must agree. Unfortunately, I bet that most of the executive
- committees who decide to go with MCI do so based only on pieces of
- paper and never once actually pick up the phone to try the service.
-
- This is the same reason why PBX manufacturers can and do get away with
- stupid feature implementation. The buying decisions are made after
- reading proposals in a cute binder. But they never so much as spend
- ten minutes to see how the phone feels, sounds, etc.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 11:42:36 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Re: 10XXX Bugs
-
-
- 800-888-1800 is supposed to be one of MCI's numbers? That number has
- popped up in a couple of cases where calls by me to a 900 number could
- not be completed as dialed.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #379
- ******************************
-
-
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa29413;
- 24 May 90 10:33 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa29903;
- 24 May 90 9:04 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa16828;
- 24 May 90 8:00 CDT
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 7:19:07 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #380
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005240719.ab22135@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Thu, 24 May 90 07:18:04 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 380
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Stamford, CT 18 Hour Phone Outage! [Peter Neumann, RISKS, via D. Lesher]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [John Slater]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [David Tamkin]
- Re: FCC REN Numbers [David Tamkin]
- Re: FCC REN Numbers [Stuart Friedberg]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Randy Bush]
- Re: Measured Service, Really Mixed Service [David Lesher]
- Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media [Nigel Allen]
- Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons [rec.humor, via D. Lesher]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: Stamford 18 Hour Phone Outage!
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 17:57:15 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
- [Moderator's Note: David wrote to send along this item from RISKS. PT]
-
- From comp.risks Wed May 23 17:57:11 1990
- Date: Mon, 21 May 1990 18:10:52 PDT
- From: "Peter G. Neumann" <neumann@csl.sri.com>
- Subject: Stamford CT 18-hour telephone switch outage affects 27,000 lines
-
- At 2:42am on Thursday, 17 May, a Number 1A ESS switch (vintage 1973)
- in Stamford, Connecticut, broke down and for 18 hours blocked all
- residential and most business local calls (affecting 27,000
- subscribers in exchanges 324, 326, 348, 351, 356, 358, 896, 964, 965,
- 969, 977, 979). (The same switch had broken down on 19-20 December
- 1985 for five hours, affecting 34,000 subscribers. Two such outages
- on the same switch is a very rare occurrence indeed.)
-
- The outage occurred while technicians were doing routine maintenance
- to update the database of phones served by that switch (12 of
- Stamford's 17 exchanges). The switch computer rejected the update and
- shut itself down. The backup system also failed. The eventual return
- to service followed extensive remote diagnostics from the AT&T
- Technology Center in Indian Hill, Illinois. However, the cause still
- remains unknown as of this afternoon (Monday).
-
- [Source: three articles by Seth Amgott in {The Advocate}, Stamford CT,
- 18 and 19 May 1990, plus phone conversations.]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "John Slater" <johns@happy.uk.sun.com>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Date: 23 May 90 15:15:50 GMT
- Reply-To: "John Slater" <johns@happy.uk.sun.com>
-
-
- In article <8132@accuvax.nwu.edu>, cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) writes:
-
- >Isn't dialing 0+citycode within your own city code permitted in the
- >U.K.? (That leading 0 is not used on incoming international calls.)
-
- Yes indeed. This has only been true in the last few years as BT has
- modernised the network.
-
-
- John
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 15:39 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
-
-
- Dan Jacobson had introduced the subject by stating how annoying it was
- to have to reprogram his telephone's memory locations when he crossed
- an area code boundary, adding 1-NPA to the numbers in the area code he
- just left and removing 1-NPA from those in the area code he had
- entered, plus having to change everything back when he returned;
-
- Isaac Rabinovitch had commented that the telephone should be
- intelligent enough to do this for him; all he should have to reprogram
- would be a single location where the telephone stored the area code in
- which it currently was being used;
-
- Linc Madison wrote in volume 10, issue 371:
-
- |[ ... that there are places where intra-NPA toll calls must be dialed as
- |1-NPA-NXX-XXXX {or, for that matter, 1-NNX-XXXX with NPA forbidden} and
- |firmware that drops the 1-NPA when the NPA of the number in repertory
- |matches the one in which you sit will fail; and ...
-
- |... that there are places where local inter-NPA dialing is NPA-NXX-XXXX
- |{or NNX-XXXX with NPA forbidden} with the leading 1 forbidden, and
- |firmware that adds 1-NPA to all numbers outside the local area code would
- |fail;]
-
- |The long and the short of it is that there is no practical way to do what
- |you are suggesting, short of maintaining an up-to-the-minute database of
- |telephone prefixes and dialing rules among them.
-
- That is all the more reason that eleven-digit dialing should always be
- permitted, even when it is not required and seven or eight or ten
- digits would do. Dialing 1-NPA-NXX-XXXX within the NANP is totally
- unambiguous and doesn't require a time-out, so there really is no
- justification that I can see for rejecting it. I submitted a question
- to the Digest about two months ago, asking what possible cause there
- could be to forbid eleven-digit local dialing, and no one responded.
- I can think of reasons not to require it, but proscription is not the
- only alternative to requirement.
-
- There are certain calls on which I would dearly love to be allowed to
- dial 1-312-NXX-XXXX within 312.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 15:42 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN Numbers
-
-
- In volume 10, issue 377, Julian Macassey answered some of Steve
- Friedl's questions about FCC ringer equivalence numbers.
-
- I have three far simpler ones (I guess):
-
- 1. What does the B or A after an REN mean?
-
- 2. If the ringer on a telephone can be turned off, does it no longer
- count in figuring the total REN load on a line?
-
- 3. Two of my modems *do* have REN's, though neither has any sort of
- bell or gong. They check in at "0.4 1.2B" and "0.5A 1.6B"
- respectively. My other modem has a speaker and thus does make a noise
- (but the speaker is powered by the electric utility, not the telco);
- it has an FCC ID but no REN on it at all.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Stuart Friedberg <stuart@rennet.cs.wisc.edu>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN Numbers
- Date: 23 May 90 22:27:32 GMT
- Organization: U of Wisconsin CS Dept
-
-
- In article <8050@accuvax.nwu.edu>, mtndew!friedl@uunet.uu.net writes:
-
- > "it's harder to make the ringer circuit with lower RENs"
-
- In article <8139@accuvax.nwu.edu> julian@bongo.uucp (Julian Macassey)
- writes:
-
- > It's very easy, but seeing as the REN is an indication of
- >power consumption, a low REN ringer may not be heard. The purpose of
- >ringers is to be heard. The most efficient ringer, if hearing and
- >directionality is important, is the classic gong ringer (REN 1.0 A).
- >Modems, phone answering machines etc, often have an REN of 0.0. They
- >just need to sniff the AC voltage to then get the logic to grab the
- >line etc. Yes, you could make a REN 0.0 device that would power a
- >steam whistle. But most of the world's ringers are self powered.
-
- Not all answering machines are so clever. I have a CodeAPhone 3750,
- which requires an external 13.5V power supply, with a REN of 1.7B (or
- was it 1.7C?). Ringing clearly isn't limited by what the CO can
- supply, and I can't imagine why it needs that much ringing "juice".
- But perhaps I don't understand REN B's and C's. Can someone help me
- out?
-
-
- Stu Friedberg (stuart@cs.wisc.edu)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Randy Bush <randy@m2xenix.psg.com>
- Date: Tue May 22 23:37:33 1990
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
-
-
- johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us (John R. Levine) writes:
-
- > In the meantime, I received a message suggesting that Sprint's new
- > echo suppressors are probably more CCITT compliant than the old ones,
- > and there may be an incompatibility with the PEP protocol. But what's
- > really amazing is that my Telebit throughput has suddenly recovered.
- > Now I routinely get well over 1000 cps coast to coast, better than
- > ever before. Perhaps our pals at Sprint read the digest and, to their
- > credit, respond to customer needs. (Take that, AT&T lovers.)
-
- Then would you please please tell them about the problems developing
- in Australia and HK. Recently PEP to and within Oceania has gone down
- to 350-400cps, where it used to be 800-900 (and sometimes 1000). We
- are told that it is a change in the local services there, and not
- satellite changes. Links to Europe and Africa seem not to have
- suffered.
-
- Notably, V.32 seems not to be affected. Getting 950-1100cps.
-
-
- ..!{uunet,qiclab,intelhf}!m2xenix!randy randy@psg.com randy@m2xenix.uucp
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: Re: Measured Service, Really Mixed Service
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Organization: NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews abusers
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 00:36:46 GMT
-
-
- I'm surprised at Lang's success at mixing service classes in one
- address. Both Ohio Bell and C+P would't let you touch this with a ten
- foot {telephone} pole.....
-
- Since the parts of both states I lived in offered unmeasured
- residence, but NOT business, they also fought tooth and nail against
- combined business/residence installations. I remember one customer of
- ours who had 20+ trunks in rotary at their office, and multiple OPX
- drops off of the first line in each of the {owners} homes. One brother
- moved, and we ordered three residence, two LMC lines {that remoted the
- radios} and one OPX, to the new address; OBT made all the flat rate
- residence lines metered. Big fight. I think we just dropped the OPX's
- and rented another LMC that WE hooked across the pair in the switch.
- That was cheaper, too.
-
- For other folks, there are several tactics. The best is a duplex
- house. Maybe it wasn't supposed to BE one, but can you convert the
- basement, long enough to satisfy the installer ;-}? Right behind this
- is a good friend neighbor. String a few pairs along the fence.....
-
- About the only tactic I have heard that works with Ma fully
- in_the_know (vs. what they don't know won't hurt them) is to request a
- "mother-in-law phone". I guess they figure any poor soul whose m.i.l.
- is moving in deserves a break. They, however do tend to get a mite bit
- paranoid when you want ten such lines, in rotary, and each one answers
- with Blazer-squawk. ;-}
-
-
- A host is a host from coast to coast.....wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu
- & no one will talk to a host that's close............(305) 255-RTFM
- Unless the host (that isn't close)......................pob 570-335
- is busy, hung or dead....................................33257-0335
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Since Illinois Bell no longer has any flat rate
- service, the issue is moot here. They do offer *untimed* local calls
- to a defined area around you to residence phones, but they still
- charge a unit for the call. Business customers do not get that much.
- Whether the location is eligible for residence service or not depends
- on the street address. IBT consults their records, and decides what is
- appropriate. They *never* object to installing a business line in a
- residence; however they *always* object to residence service at a
- place they consider a business location. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 20 May 90 17:00:26 EDT
- From: Nigel Allen <Nigel.Allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology, and the Media
-
-
- john@zygot.ati.com (John Higdon) writes:
-
- >Think of the last story you read in the newspaper concerning any
- >technological matter. Was it complete, or was it simplified to the
- >point that little useful information was available? What information
- >there was, was it accurate, misleading, or downright erroneous?
-
- Most journalists don't have the background to properly cover stories
- about science and technology. This is why big-city newspapers usually
- assign high-technology stories to a single writer, or to a handful of
- them.
-
- I have an idea which might eventually raise the quality of
- telecommunications journalism. Why not call your local journalism
- school or student newspaper, and offer to talk to a class about
- current issues in telecommunications, and how to cover them?
-
- I know that some regular participants in this echo are university
- faculty members, and that others may have worked as teaching
- assistants. I'd particularly encourage those of you with teaching
- experience to offer your services in this project, but anybody who is
- articulate and well-organized could probably help journalism students
- to develop a better understanding of this fascinating subject of
- telecommunications.
-
-
- Nigel Allen telephone (416) 535-8916
- 52 Manchester Avenue fax (416) 978-7552
- Toronto, Ontario M6G 1V3 nigel.allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
- Canada
-
- Nigel Allen - via FidoNet node 1:221/171
- UUCP: uunet!watmath!xenitec!zswamp!250!438!Nigel.Allen
- ARPA: Nigel.Allen@f438.n250.z1.fidonet.org
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 18:54:05 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Since David Lesher opened this issue of TELECOM
- Digest, I decided to ask him to give the Benediction also. PT]
-
-
- From rec.humor Wed May 23 18:54:02 1990
- From: commgrp@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (BACS Data Communications Group)
- Newsgroups: rec.humor
- Subject: pj on TPC
- Message-ID: <45497@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
- Date: 22 May 90 16:25:29 GMT
-
- In _Popular Communications_ magazine, June 1990, p. 4, the editor, Tom
- Kneitel, tells of his woes with The Phone Company's call-waiting
- service, and how he got the runaround when he tried to cancel it. He
- wasted their time in turn: [Grammar as published.]
-
- "Whom do you suppose it was at the phone company that came up with the
- idea of putting area codes in parenthesis, as in (800)-555-1212.
- Doesn't appear to serve any practical purpose, nor does it match up
- very will with the rues governing the use of parenthesis...
-
- "The other day, I called telco... I told them that I had discovered my
- phone might be defective because it was missing the symbols necessary
- to dial long distance calls. I said that I could find a star and a
- crosshatch on the buttons, but not those curved ones that go around
- the area code. How was I to make any long distance calls if my phone
- was missing those buttons?
-
- "I got the impression that even though they...had...heard it all, this
- one was a bombshell that caught them off guard. A surprising string
- of supervisors and managers took the time to tell me that it wasn't
- necessary to actually include the curved symbols in my dialing, but
- they either handed me off to someone else, or promised to call me back
- when I demanded to know why the curved lines were there if they were
- meaningless.
-
- "Another twenty minutes of being pushed on this end and I suspect they
- would have promised to send over a telephone with parenthesis buttons
- because it was the only way to finally get rid of me.
-
- "Even so, it was less than an hour of enjoyment for me as they
- squirmed to keep a straight face while dealing with a crackpot... A
- small price they paid for the year of beeping I endured as a result of
- their infernal _Call Waiting_."
-
- ----------- furthermore -----------
-
- ojo: Why did they have to change the 911 emergency phone number in
- <neighboring state>?
-
- Because the <natives> couldn't find the eleven on their phones.
-
-
- Frank reid@ucs.indiana.edu
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Make the appropriate substitutions above according
- to your own personal prejudices. This reminds me of the time I was on
- duty at my switchboard and a call came in from someone at a pay
- station. They asked for a particular extension; I rang it but there
- was no answer. Calling party asked if *I* would return their ten
- cents! :) Seriously, would I make it up? To really see just how
- stupid people can be, try running a switchboard for a few
- months/years. My ears are still callused from things people said, and
- what they called me, etc. I was cussed, ridiculed, praised, and
- propositioned. Finally I put up a little sign on the board which said,
- "I am not a fast operator. Nor am I a slow operator. I am merely a
- half-fast operator." PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #380
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa20388;
- 24 May 90 23:51 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa21080;
- 24 May 90 22:11 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa04727;
- 24 May 90 21:07 CDT
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 20:18:07 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #381
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005242018.ab09437@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Thu, 24 May 90 20:17:57 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 381
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Who are the Biggest Users of Telecom? [TELECOM Moderator]
- Sprint WD-40 Surprises [Carol Springs]
- Dimension 2000 Dilemma [Hugh D. Meier]
- Technology Trends [Jeanne P. Bayerl]
- AT&T Commits Universal Card Fraud [Brian Litzinger]
- Panel (ugh!) Switches [Jack Winslade]
- Singapore 2000 Exhibition [TELECOM Moderator]
- Interesting East Berlin Number is West German Cellular [John R. Covert]
- Re: Fascist Ma Bell [Jim Harkins]
- Re: ESS Historical Note [Peter Weiss]
- Re: Interesting Police Technology [John Debert]
- Re: Volume Control on Public Phones [Eric Black]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 18:35:22 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Who are the Biggest Users of Telecom?
-
-
- According to {Communications Week}, in its second annual report, the
- top one hundred users of telecommuications services include many
- telecommunications companies themselves.
-
- Governments were not included in the ranking. The top ten are as
- follows --
-
- 1. General Motors
- 2. American Telephone and Telegraph
- 3. International Business Machines
- 4. General Electric
- 5. Ford Motor Company
- 6. Sears
- 7. Citicorp
- 8. Texas Air
- 9. United Parcel Service
- 10. Mobil Oil Company
-
- Skipping through the list, other large users include --
-
- 15. BellSouth
- 28. Bell Atlantic
- 35. Southwestern Bell
- 46. Ameritech
- 63. NYNEX
- 83. Pacific Telesis
- 89. US West
-
- Monthly billings for the top ten are in the millions of dollars per
- month. It is interesting to note that AT&T spends more per month on
- its own telephone/communications requirements than any of its largest
- customers except General Motors. If federal, state or municipal
- governments were included in the list, the top ten still would change
- very little, except that Uncle Sugar would bump the first ten down a
- notch, and a couple of large states would further scatter the top ten.
-
- The three largest customers in Chicago are in order, the City of
- Chicago itself, the University of Chicago, and Standard Oil a/k/a
- Amoco. But their monthly bills are only about a million dollars each
- ... and neither Amoco or U of C made the top ten.
-
- My assumption about the bunch of them is they probably get their
- trouble tickets opened and handled promptly! :)
-
-
- PT
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Carol Springs <drilex!carols@husc6.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Sprint WD-40 Surprises
- Date: 23 May 90 16:17:31 GMT
- Organization: DRI/McGraw-Hill, Lexington, MA
-
-
- Can the Digest bear one more article on Sprint WD-40 account hassles?
- I'll 'fess up -- I wanted my free hour despite the fact that I already
- had a Sprint FONcard. So I figured I'd get a card by giving them my
- work phone number and work address, rationalizing that since I get
- reimbursed for business calls, I really would use the extra card for
- separate accounting (someday ... maybe).
-
- My first bill came with a 90-cent phone call charge and an extra $10
- charge labeled "FON card non-recurring charge." Fine, I thought, I
- got what I deserved. I sent Sprint a check for 90 cents and wrote
- customer service, enclosing the new FONcard. In the letter, I said
- that I hadn't been told about the $10 surcharge, and would they please
- credit that charge and then cancel my account? Shortly thereafter, I
- got a call at work from Sprint, saying that they were doing as I'd
- requested and were crediting the $10 and canceling the account.
-
- Today I got a second invoice from Sprint at work. I opened it,
- expecting to see a bill either for $.00 or for the original $10 (since
- the bill might not reflect the $10 credit yet). Here is the invoice,
- word for word:
-
- Balance from last invoice $ 10.90
- Prior period credits $ 10.00
- Payment received 4/27/90 $ .90 Thank you
- Unpaid balance $ .00 as of 05/13/90
-
- Call activity through 5/12/90
- Charges Credits
- -------------------------
- Total usage $ .00
- FON card non-recurring charge $ 10.00
- 60 min free/acct $ .00
- Total feature awards $ .00
- Federal excise tax $ .00
- Current invoice total $ 10.00
- Total amount due $ 10.00
-
- In other words, Sprint credited me with $10 as requested -- then
- charged me again for the same $10! "Non-recurring charge," indeed...
-
- Never again. Never again. Never again.
-
-
- Carol Springs carols@drilex.dri.mgh.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 14:47:29 EDT
- From: "Hugh D. Meier" <HUGH@brownvm.brown.edu>
- Subject: Dimension 2000 Dilemma
-
-
- I have recently replaced a DIM 2000PBX (with an SL-100 sn) and now am
- faced with a room full of old equipment. I am beginning to
- investigate Dimension customers to inquire if they need spare parts.
- I have also contacted Farm- stead Group without much luck.
-
- I will appreciate any advice / experience in this area. I would
- particularly like if a group would come and disassemble and take away
- the equipment after they purchase it. Hope this is not too abitious.
-
- I can be contacted E-mail: hugh@brownvm.bitnet or post to TELECOM. If
- E-mail is abundant, I will post summary. Thanks.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 15:16:32 EDT
- From: Jeanne P Bayerl <jpb@mtqub.att.com>
- Subject: Technology Trends
-
-
- I'm trying to assess technology trends in the telecom industry,
- particularly in COs, Network Services, ISDN (market penetration,
- offerings, tariffs), Long Distance services, CLASS offerings, Centrex,
- etc. Does anyone have any insight on what to expect in these areas?
-
-
- Thanks in advance!
- Jeanne Bayerl
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Brian Litzinger <brian@apt.bungi.com>
- Subject: AT&T Commits Universal Card Fraud
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 13:59:41 PDT
-
-
- A quote from a letter I received from AT&T:
-
- Mr. Brian Litzinger...
-
- Thank you for applying for the AT&T Universal Card...
-
- I, of course, have never applied for an AT&T Universal Card. In fact,
- I've never applied for any VISA, MASTERCARD or similar card.
-
- Now I expect it is my responsibility to clean this mess up. My
- valuable time writing, calling, tracking down the right agency, the
- right person, clearing their credit query from my credit history ...
-
- And you thought MCI's switching people without permission was rude!
-
- [Financial Analyst's Note: Yes, credit checks (inquiries) are kept
- track of in your credit history and some organizations will count them
- against you if you have some that are not followed up by the granting
- of some sort of credit.]
-
-
- <> Brian Litzinger @ APT Technology Inc., San Jose, CA
- <> brian@apt.bungi.com {apple,sun,pyramid}!daver!apt!brian
- <> Disclaimer: Above are my opinions and probably wrong.
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: I really think 'fraud' was a bit harsh. Either
- someone submitted your name, or another person with the same name
- applied and in the process your name and address were picked up in
- error. I doubt they simply went through phone books looking for names
- of people they could 'defraud'. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 10:34:57 EDT
- From: Jack Winslade <Jack.Winslade@f666.n285.z1.fidonet.org>
- Subject: Panel (ugh!) Switches
- Reply-to: Jack.Winslade@f666.n285.z1.fidonet.org
- Organization: DRBBS Technical BBS, Omaha, Ne. 402-896-3537
-
-
- In a message of <16 May 90 03:16:44>, Larry Lippman writes:
-
- >6. As a point of historical interest only since all panel apparatus
- > has now gone to the Central Office in the Sky :-), ...
- > The calling office would seize the trunk, and would count pulses sent
- > back to it from the panel office until ...
-
- I've been fascinated with the panel switches (Ma Bell's answer to Rube
- Goldberg) ever since seeing an aging one in action back in 1971 or so.
- If I remember my facts correctly, the revertive pulse-counting method
- was necessary because the speed of the rollers driving the rods up the
- frames was not exact, and this provided the feedback necessary to
- locate the correct contacts.
-
- Another thing that I found peculiar to this particular installation
- was that an adjoining #1 crossbar office was also equipped with this
- type of revertive-pulse sending system, which made the crossbar office
- look like a panel office as far as interoffice signaling was
- concerned.
-
- <warning: nostalgia alert>
-
- One bit of trivia that I have stumbled upon is that Ma Bell's first
- full-scale panel installation was right here in Omaha in 1921. I've
- located a news article about it, and I'll send it in to the Digest as
- soon as I'm through typing it in. (It's not THAT long. ;-)
-
- When I was served by this panel office, I had lousy service, and after
- seeing the switch in action I understand why. It might have been
- state of the art for the Roaring 20's, but in the 70's it was holding
- on by a thread. Line noise was common. Had I been a modemer then, I
- would have been SOL. When calling a busy number in the same office, I
- remember it would sometimes ring (back to the caller) up to two times
- or so and then sputter a bit and finally send back the busy tone. I
- also remember picking up the phone and getting dumped right in the
- middle of another conversation instead of a dial tone.
-
- Another thing was that I >>SWEAR<< I heard a distinctive set of clicks
- when I was on the phone and someone else was trying to phone me.
- (1920's Call Waiting ??) On several occasions when this happened,
- someone WAS doing just that. The switchman said this was not the
- case. Coincidence ??
-
- Good Day! JSW
-
- (Yes, I have hugged my cat today. All four of them. ;-)
-
- Through FidoNet gateway node 1:16/390
- Jack.Winslade@f666.n285.z1.fidonet.org
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: We had one particularly memorable panel office
- here. That office, known as Chicago-Wabash went from Panel to ESS in
- 1974. From funky ringing signals and trashed out relays to custom
- calling features overnight. The last two or three years the Panel was
- in operation, it was common to call a busy number, but get two or
- three rings before it caught up with the 'busy signal' which it then
- put on your line. And when connecting to a number in that CO: 'chunk,
- ka-chunk, bang-bang, ka-chunk, CRASH! ring, ring', then an answer.
- Unofficially it was called 'the Wabash Cannonball'. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 18:38:09 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Singapore 2000 Exhibition
-
-
- Prototypes of futuristic portable personal telecommunications gadgets
- will be on display at the 18-day Singapore 2000-Global Technopolis
- exhibition starting June 7. Singapore Telecom, AT&T, NEC, Telerate
- and others will be exhibiting their offerings in the Global
- Telecommunications Pavilion. It should be worth a visit. If any of our
- far-eastern/Australian readers happen to attend, please report back.
- Of course, any Americans attending are welcome to write an article
- also.
-
-
- PT
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 22:35:25 PDT
- From: "John R. Covert 24-May-1990 0117" <covert@covert.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: Interesting East Berlin Number is West German Cellular
-
-
- > If you are considering doing business in Eastern Europe,
- > call Salomon Brothers in East Berlin at 49-161-2610935.
-
- The TELECOM Digest Archives have a wealth of information, including
- the answer to this question. The number is a West German C-Netz
- cellular phone. Operating it in East Berlin (or in any country other
- than West Germany, even just over the border) is not technically
- legal. Theoretically, when you drive from West Germany to West
- Berlin, you have to pay the East German border guards a fee for the
- right to keep your phone in the car and turned _off_.
-
- Things are changing, and although I doubt that what this company is
- doing is legal yet, they're not likely to get into serious trouble.
-
- Incoming calls to cellular phones in Germany are paid by the caller.
- There's no extra charge for calling a cellular number from outside the
- country -- it's actually much cheaper to call from Amsterdam or even
- from the U.S. at certain times than from within Germany, where it's
- about $1.00 per minute during the peak period at current exchange
- rates.
-
- Don't try to call it on Sprint, it won't work. When I was over there
- with a phone rented from Sixt/Budget Rent-a-Car, I could be reached
- via AT&T, but not on MCI or Sprint. MCI has since fixed the problem.
-
- At the time of this writing, you get the recording "Zu diesem
- Anschluss besteht zur Zeit keine Funkverbindung" which means "There is
- currently no radio contact with this station." The phone is turned
- off or has been out of range for a long time; there's a different
- recording if the phone is out of range but has been within range in
- the last few minutes.
-
-
- /john
-
- [Moderator's Note: Mr. Covert wrote an interesting article on cellular
- service in West Germany which appeared in TELECOM Digest on June 20,
- 1989. (Volume 9, Issue 204). If further reading is desired, you may
- pull the archives file, '1989.vol9.iss201-250'. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jim Harkins <sagpd1!jharkins@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Fascist Ma Bell
- Date: 23 May 90 22:45:34 GMT
- Reply-To: Jim Harkins <sagpd1!jharkins@uunet.uu.net>
- Organization: Scientific Atlanta, Government Products Div, San Diego, CA
-
-
- In article <7262@accuvax.nwu.edu> raydu@ico.isc.com (Ray Dueland) writes:
-
- > It turns out the Ma Bell doesn't take such things lightly. Pacific
- > Bell in particular is fascist and has used its power to have BBS
- > systems carrying the "blue box" frequencies confiscated.
-
- So tell me, what are they going to do if (when?) these things get
- posted on [usenet | internet | bitnet | foonet]? Seems to me that if
- Ma Bell wants to make the quarterly report look good all they do is
- post these numbers themselves, then confiscate all those networked
- machines the next day :-)
-
-
- jim jharkins@sagpd1
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Penn State University
- Date: Thursday, 24 May 1990 07:55:46 EDT
- From: Peter Weiss <PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Subject: Re: ESS Historical Note
-
-
- In article <8162@accuvax.nwu.edu>, mcb@ihlpf.att.com says:
-
- >Historical Note:
-
- >Wednesday, May 30, 1990 is the 25th anniversary of the cutover of the
- >first No. 1 Electronic Switching System (ESS)* in Succasunna, New
- >Jersey.
-
- I wonder how frequently the *location* of these historical telecom
- events is based on geography relative to the manufacture and the
- CO?
-
-
- Peter M. Weiss 31 Shields Bldg University Park, PA USA 16802
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: 1965 was about the time that Morris, IL also got an
- experimental ESS office. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: John Debert <claris!netcom!onymouse@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: Interesting Police Technology
- Date: 24 May 90 07:43:18 GMT
- Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 249-0290}
-
-
- San Jose PD uses MDT's, or, as they call them, MCT's which are put in
- all field supervisor's cars plus quite a few MERGE cars as well as the
- BIG boss's cars. Recently, they moved from 460MHz to somewhere-I-have-
- yet-to-find.
-
- I have heard the transmissions to and from these units and estimate
- the rate at about 1200baud. It shouldn't be too hard for someone with
- perhaps a TNC to connect their scanner to a terminal and read the
- traffic.
-
-
- J. DeBert
- onymouse@netcom.UUCP
- ...!apple!netcom!onymouse
- CI$: 75530,347 | GEnie: onymouse
- P.O.Box 51067 Pacific Grove, CA 93950
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 09:46:59 PDT
- From: Eric Black <ericb@atherton.com>
- Subject: Re: Volume Control on Public Phones
-
-
- > You're only supposed to need to use the adjustment if you have
- > impaired hearing.
-
- I am glad to see that such phones (with amplified handsets) are fairly
- common at airports; often I get off a plane with hearing temporarily
- impaired due to air pressure not yet equalized in my
- ear/head/whatever.
-
- (Then, right in the middle of a conversation, with phone volume turned
- up LOAD, my ears finally *pop!*, and after a blast from the phone
- handset I'm deaf again :-)
-
-
- Eric Black "Garbage in, Gospel out"
- Atherton Technology, 1333 Bordeaux Dr., Sunnyvale, CA, 94089
- Email: ericb@Atherton.COM Voice: +1 408 734 9822
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #381
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa23529;
- 25 May 90 1:02 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa14838;
- 24 May 90 23:14 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab21080;
- 24 May 90 22:11 CDT
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 21:22:58 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #382
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005242122.ab05826@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Thu, 24 May 90 21:22:22 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 382
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Data Access Lines [Tom Gray]
- Re: Data Access Lines [Paul Elliott]
- Re: Cordless Telephone Dies [Robert Stratton]
- Re: Cordless Telephone Dies [Stephen J. Friedl]
- Re: AT&T Software Defined Network [Bryan M. Richardson]
- Re: System 85 Components [Ronald L. Fletcher]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [John R. Levine]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Mark Brader]
- Re: The So-Called Long-Distance Add-on [Larry Geary]
- Re: His Master's Voice [Lou Judice]
- Re: Auto-collect From a Pay Phone [Subodh Bapat]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Tom Gray <mitel!spock!grayt@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Date: 24 May 90 12:38:23 GMT
- Reply-To: Tom Gray <mitel!healey!grayt@uunet.uu.net>
- Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.
-
-
- I expected a great many people to answer with the definitions of the
- telephony impairment parameters requested in the original message.
- Here is my attempt:
-
- dbrNC0 - This is a measure of noise db's relative to the noise
- level (-90dbm or 1 picowatt) with C message frequency
- weighting measured at the 0 transmission level point.
-
- impulse noise - A count of the hits above a specifice noise level
- in a specific period of time - a measure of the pops
- on the line.
-
- gain slope - A measure of the frequency response of insertion loss
- three frequencies are used 440, 1000 and 2800Hz at 0dBm.
- The difference in insertion loss between these frequencies
- is a measure of the flatness of the insertion loss and
- thus of the linearity of the circuit. 2800Hz was chosen
- for data, 440 for voice and 1000 since it is standard.
- Other combinations (say 1000 and 2800 only) ar also used.
-
- envelope delay - This is the difference in the phase delays between
- different frequencies. If the phase delay for a circuit
- is not linear, the shape of the signal transmitted through
- it will be distorted. This is very important for data lines
- since pulse shape fidelity is required for proper detection
- of the signal.
-
- Strictly speaking envelope delay is the negative slope of the
- phase delay.
-
- re: Larry Lippman's definitions of the telephony impairment measurements.
-
- I hate to disagree with Mr. Lippman's definitions but they are not
- accurate.
-
- The 0 in DbrnC0 refers to the 0 TLP (transmission level point). The
- TLP concept refers to a system for making measurements of anlog
- signals at different points in the network. The 0 TLP is usually the
- digital signal or a mythical point in the centre of an analog switch.
- If a signal of 0 dbm is measured at the 0 TLP it will read 0dbM on a
- physical meter. If 6db's of loss are provided in a circuit which
- reduces the TLP to the -6 point, the physical signal will read -6dbm.
- To avoid confusion, meters are arranged to take into account fixed
- losses with the TLP concept. Meters with this ability will give
- readings of 0dbm at both the 0 and -6 point in this instance. This
- reduces confustion in making transmission measurements.
-
- Impulse noise does not refer to noise adjusted for the loss in the
- subscribers loop. It is a measure of noise hits above a specific noise
- level. It is a measure of the pops on the line. In the case described,
- the telco will guarantee no npisnoise hits above 59dbrnC0. Other specs
- could be to provide fewer than say 15 hits per day above 40dbrnC0.
-
- Envelope distortion is a measure of the non-linearity of the phase
- delay. A fixed 200 microsecond delay for all frequencies is perfectly
- acceptable. It would just delay the data pulse train by 200
- microseconds. This is just a description of the finite speed of
- electircal signals. The problem occurs if there is different deays for
- different frequencies. This will distort the pulse shapes and make
- detection more difficult. The eye pattern will be impaired. Envelope
- distortion is the negative derivative of the phase delay response of
- the circuit.
-
- The definition of gain slope was more or less accurate. Different
- frequencies other than the ones given can be used.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Paul Elliott x225 <optilink!elliott@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Line
- Date: 24 May 90 16:42:55 GMT
- Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
-
-
- In article <8137@accuvax.nwu.edu>, kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net (Larry Lippman)
- writes:
-
- [(excellent explanation of telecom transmission parameters)]
-
- > > Relative Delay (1000 to 2604 Hz) 200 usec.
-
- > This is more correctly referred to as envelope delay
- > distortion, and represents the maximum phase shift of a signal
- > expressed in a unit of time. To put this figure in perspective, bear
- > in mind that 200 usec is 0.2 times the period of one cycle of a 1 kHz
- > signal, or stated another way, a phase shift of 72 degrees.
- > Obviously, as the frequency increases, the implication of a fixed 200
- ^^^^^^^^^
- > usec delay interval becomes more severe!
- ^^^^^^^^^^
-
- I am not sure exactly which type of delay is being referred to here,
- but note that a *fixed*delay* creates no phase distortion at all.
- Don't be confused by the fact that a given fixed delay can be equated
- to a different phase shift at different frequencies, what is really
- happening is that all components of the signal are being time-offset
- (delayed) by a fixed amount, and thus retain the original
- phase-relationship.
-
- (No doubt Larry knows all this, I was just a bit confused by the
- terminology.)
-
- If the 200 usec delay is a differential delay, or group delay
- distortion, then signals of different frequencies will be delayed by
- different amounts, and phase distortion *will* result.
-
- Now, what *is* "Relative Delay"? (Sounds like differential/group
- delay to me.)
-
-
- Paul M. Elliott Optilink Corporation (707) 795-9444
- {uunet, pyramid, pixar, tekbspa}!optilink!elliott
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Robert Stratton <strat@grebyn.com>
- Subject: Re: Cordless Telephone Dies
- Date: 24 May 90 13:37:53 GMT
- Reply-To: Robert Stratton <grebyn!strat@grebyn.com>
- Organization: Grebyn Timesharing, Vienna, VA, USA
-
-
- Re: Panasonic cordless phones and clicks...
-
- I recently bought a Panasonic cordless for my mother, and was quite
- annoyed that while/after dialing a number, I would hear loud clicks
- with the pulsing you described for several seconds (up to 20).
-
- After a little scanner experimentation/deduction, it seems that the
- clicking is actually the sound of the receiver's scanning mechanism
- attempting to find a clear channel. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to
- stop immediately after finding one. :-(
-
- Have you checked your charger output terminals with a voltmeter? I'd
- be interested to hear what you're actually getting from the charger
- transformer.
-
-
- Bob Stratton | INET: strat@grebyn.com; UUCP: grebyn!strat, well!strat
- Stratton Sys.Design| GEnie: R.STRATTON32; DELPHI: RJSIII
- Alexandria, VA | PSTN: +1 703 765 4335 (H) +1 703 591 7101 (W)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 14:18:41 -0400
- From: mtndew!friedl@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: Re: Cordless Telephone Dies
-
-
- > But where in the world does one get parts [for Panasonic phones]
-
- Parts for Panasonic phones can be ordered from Pacific Coast Parts in
- southern CA. Their number is +1 800 877 2787 (in CA, at least), or +1
- 213 515 0207. They are nice to work with and they do return their
- phone calls.
-
- "Satisfied customer only" disclaimers apply.
-
-
- Stephen J. Friedl, KA8CMY / Software Consultant / Tustin, CA / 3B2-kind-of-guy
- +1 714 544 6561 voice / friedl@vsi.com / {uunet,attmail}!mtndew!friedl
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 12:21:44 EDT
- From: Bryan M Richardson <bmr@ihuxz.att.com>
- Subject: Re: AT&T Software Defined Network
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- In article <8083@accuvax.nwu.edu> pvf@ho3by.att.com writes:
-
- >In TELECOM Digest V10 #359, eli@pws.bull.com asks about the phrase
- >"Software Defined Network" on his new AT&T calling card and wonders if
- >we just figured out how to make use of software in our network.
-
- >Software Defined Network Service (SDN) is a service that has been
- >tariffed since 1984. It's a service usually used by business
- >customers with multiple locations.
-
- Let me explain my background -- I work in 4 ESS development planning
- working new features for SDN. SDN was tariffed in September, 1985,
- and became generally available for customer use in the beginning of
- 1986 (testing occured prior to this time).
-
- As John Higdon explained, there are many ways to access the "virtual
- private network," one of which is by a 0+ calling card access. The
- customer is able to choose options for what appears on the card, and
- apparently the original poster's company has chosen to have "Software
- Defined Network" among the words on the card.
-
- SDN is networking solution offered by AT&T to the largest customers --
- typically those placing millions of minutes of calls a year. If there
- are specific questions regarding the service, I'll be happy to answer
- them.
-
-
- Bryan Richardson, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Naperville, IL
- att!attbl!ihuxz!bmr (708) 979-6157
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 15:34:35 EDT
- From: Ronald L Fletcher <rlf@mtgzy.att.com>
- Subject: Re: System 85 Components
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- In article <8085@accuvax.nwu.edu>, MJB8949@ritvax.bitnet (Nutsy Fagen) writes:
-
- > Does anyone know were I can get 'summary' descriptions of all the
- > major blocks of hardware needed to make an ATT System 85 work?
-
- What you want is a "Definity Generic 2 and System 85 Description
- Manual." This is a reference manual which will give an overview of
- each circuit pack and how all the pieces work together. I have not
- personally read this document, but the same doc for System 75 was
- quite enlightening. I dont believe this doc is shipped with the
- customer docs when a system is purchased, but some customers do order
- it, so check around the switch room and with the switch administrator.
- If you cant find it and would like to purchase it, call the AT&T
- documentation hotline at 1-800-432-6600 and ask for doc number
- 555104-201, it is $79.00.
-
- > Thanks!
- > Mike
-
- You're welcome!
-
- Ron Fletcher
- att!mtgzy!rlf
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 21:34:18 EDT
- From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us>
-
-
- While watching the rain at my beach house in New Jersey last weekend,
- I did a little phone number experimentation.
-
- Readers may recall that New Jersey is one of the few places to have a
- strict implementation of NANP dialing, e.g. seven digits with no area
- code or else 1+10 digits, completely independent of whether the number
- called is local, toll, inter- or intra-lata. In has to be, since the
- 201 area and its soon to be split 908 area have many NXX prefixes, and
- even though 609 has no NXX, some of the NXX prefixes in 201 are
- dialable from 609 as seven-digit local calls.
-
- I was surprised to discover that any number that I could dial as seven
- digits, I could also dial as 1-609-NNX-XXXX. This included local,
- intra-lata, and inter-lata calls. (My beach house is in one of the
- smallest latas in the country, consting of the small and not very
- populous strip of the 609 NPA along the coast.)
-
- Since New Jersey is now almost entirely ESS except perhaps for some of
- the independent telcos in the northwest part of the state, I expect
- that this sort of dialing should work most places in the state.
-
-
- Regards,
-
- John Levine, johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us, {spdcc|ima|lotus}!esegue!johnl
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Mark Brader <msb@sq.com>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Date: Thu, 24 May 1990 19:32:40 -0400
-
-
- > Dan Jacobson had introduced the subject by stating how annoying it was
- > to have to reprogram his telephone's memory locations when he crossed
- > an area code boundary ... Isaac Rabinovitch had commented that the
- > telephone should be intelligent enough to do this for him ...
- > I submitted a question to the Digest about two months ago, asking what
- > possible cause there could be to forbid eleven-digit local dialing ...
-
- Implementation issues aside, there is a simple reason to forbid it,
- one which has certainly been mentioned in this forum in the past.
- Certainly it is not that strong a reason, but in the traditional
- environment where people were NOT carrying telephones with memories
- all over the place, it was the most relevant one.
-
- If I dial 1-416-759-0000, it is rejected because that is not the way
- to dial the local number 759-0000, and *therefore I must have
- misdialed*. Perhaps I really wanted 1-415-759-0000, say; San
- Francisco instead of Toronto. So why bother the poor wretch who has
- that number in Toronto?
-
- In the old days when "leading 1 means long distance" applied here,
- this argument was even stronger, as this would also apply if I dialed
- 1-416-759-0000 from, say, Hamilton, within area 416 but not a local
- call. Now, however, we have to dial an area code on all long distance
- calls, and 1-416-759-0000 is the way to dial Toronto's 759-0000 from
- Hamilton.
-
- (I know that 759 exists in Toronto and San Francisco. I don't know if
- 759-0000 exists and I'd rather you did not dial it to find out!)
-
-
- Mark Brader, SoftQuad Inc., Toronto, utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com
- "Have you ever heard [my honesty] questioned?"
- "I never even heard it mentioned." -- Every Day's a Holiday
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 14:49:38 EDT
- From: lmg@cbnewsh.att.com
- Subject: Re: The So-Called Long-Distance Add-on
-
-
- In article <7895@accuvax.nwu.edu> covert@covert.enet.dec.com (John R.
- Covert 17-May-1990 1012) writes:
-
- >There is _no_ long-distance add-on. The only relationship that the
- >access charge has to long distance is that it replaces the subsidy
- >that AT&T used to pay local phone companies out of the old, higher,
- >long distance rates.
-
- Now that the Baby Bells have grown up, does anyone see a chance of the
- access charge being repealed?
-
-
- Larry Geary: 74017.3065@compuserve.com
- lmg@mtqub.att.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 07:52:59 PDT
- From: Lou Judice <judice@sulaco.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: Re: His Master's Voice
-
-
- I've had exactly the opposite problem. When my answering machine picks
- up and someone talks, my two cats immediately jump up and start
- playing with the buttons, invariably rewinding it, or in one case,
- fast fowarding it to the end of the tape.
-
- I've turned the volume all the way down to avoid missed messages.
-
-
- /ljj
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Subodh Bapat <mailrus!uflorida!rm1!bapat@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Auto-collect From a Pay Phone
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 8:53:42 EDT
-
-
- In article <7989@accuvax.nwu.edu>, MCL9337@tamvenus.bitnet writes:
-
- > In my original post, I left out the fact that the phone DID play back
- > my recorded name statement. One of the problems with the entire idea
- > of the automation is that the calling party's name is all that can be
- > given.
-
- That's not a problem, it's a design restriction.
-
- If they didn't restrict it to name only, you could always say, "Jim,
- this is John. Call me back at 555-1234." Jim could then press 2 to
- refuse the collect call, and dial you right back, thus avoiding paying
- collect-call charges.
-
- > Of course, one COULD say "John Doe calling for Jim Doe," I guess.
-
- In general you could get any one-way message across for free ("Honey,
- the flight came in on time, I'll call you tomorrow at 9 pm") and your
- wife could then refuse the call.
-
-
- Subodh Bapat novavax!rm1!bapat@uunet.uu.net OR bapat@rm1.uucp
- MS E-204, P.O.Box 407044, Racal-Milgo, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33340 (305) 846-6068
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #382
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa02570;
- 25 May 90 4:55 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa20623;
- 25 May 90 3:20 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa18340;
- 25 May 90 2:16 CDT
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 1:33:00 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #383
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005250133.ab08294@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Fri, 25 May 90 01:32:18 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 383
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Interstate, IntraLATA Calling [Carl Moore]
- Re: AT&T "Excellence" [Todd Inch]
- Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought [Todd Inch]
- Re: Distinctive Ringing Recognition [John Higdon]
- Re: Telephones, Technology and Media [Paul S. R. Chisholm]
- Re: Online CCITT Standards -- There is a Way! [John Gilmore]
- Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD Long Distance Discount [M. Berch]
- New Telephone Tax Hits California Users [TELECOM Moderator]
- Switchboard Operations [John Higdon]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 13:43:41 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Re: Interstate, IntraLATA Calling
-
-
- A call placed from Delaware to most of the 215 area (and vice versa)
- is interstate and intraLATA (Philadelphia LATA). I don't know what
- the status of the carriers is there. (I.e., can you use another car-
- rier besides Diamond State/Bell of Pa.?)
-
- Bell of Pa. & NJ Bell are authorized as carriers between Philadelphia
- (Pa.) metro and nearby New Jersey areas. A similar setup exists
- between northern New Jersey and New York City. (I don't know about
- suburbs in 914 area in New York State.)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: AT&T "Excellence"
- Reply-To: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Organization: Global Tech Int'l Inc.
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 21:58:43 GMT
-
-
- PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu (Peter Weiss) and drilex!carols@husc6.harvard.edu
- (Carol Springs) discuss AT&T asking if the customer received
- "excellent service".
-
- My wife called AT&T yesterday and asked them to drop our "Reach Out
- Washington" (which wasn't saving us any money :-() and got the same
- "Did I give you excellent service?" question at the end of the call.
-
- Yes, she did get good service, the rep didn't try to talk her out of
- it or anything and understood her request.
-
- My bet is on a new slogan for their TV commercials.
-
-
- Todd Inch, System Manager, Global Technology, Mukilteo WA (206) 742-9111
- UUCP: {smart-host}!gtisqr!toddi ARPA: gtisqr!toddi@beaver.cs.washington.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: Home Wiring Advice Sought
- Reply-To: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Organization: Global Tech Int'l Inc.
- Date: Tue, 22 May 90 22:28:44 GMT
-
-
- In article <7909@accuvax.nwu.edu> julian@bongo.uucp (Julian Macassey)
- writes that it is illogical to get crosstalk between twisted pairs in
- a multi-pair cable considering that all the pairs are in one cable on
- their way to the CO without any problems.
-
- Thanks for saving me the typing, I couldn't agree more.
-
- It is critical, however, to make sure that each line is actually on
- one "pair". For instance, the Blue/White and White/Blue striped wires
- form a pair and should be used for one line. Use the Orange/White
- PAIR for the next line, etc.
-
- Note the difference between two-pair and four-conductor wire: you can
- run two lines on two pair, one line on each pair. You shouldn't do
- this on the four conductor because the Red/Green aren't twisted
- separately from the Black/Yellow. There *are no* pairs in that stuff.
- Yes, I learned this the hard way.
-
- If you're not sure about the cable, strip off a foot or two of the
- outer sheathing. You should be able to see if they're twisted pairs
- or not.
-
- Also, the further you run on non-paired wire, the worse off you are.
- For very short distances there shouldn't be a problem.
-
- I'm not sure the four-conductor stuff is twisted at all. It's hard to
- tell since the outer sheathing isn't "hollow" and can't be stripped
- off easily without untwisting the conductors. If it's not twisted and
- you run two of these cables next to each other, you'll still have the
- same cross-talk problem.
-
- Anybody know for sure, or does it depend on the particular cable?
-
- All this applies to the flexible flat "modular" style (usually silver
- colored) cable, too. Don't use that stuff for "permanent" wiring -
- just between the phone sets and the wall.
-
-
- Todd Inch, System Manager, Global Technology, Mukilteo WA (206) 742-9111
- UUCP: {smart-host}!gtisqr!toddi ARPA: gtisqr!toddi@beaver.cs.washington.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Distinctive Ringing Recognition
- Date: 24 May 90 20:27:09 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- "VAXB::DBURKE" <dburke%vaxb.decnet@nusc-npt.navy.mil> writes:
-
- > The tone pattern is standard ring for my regular line, and two longs
- > for the kiddie line.
-
- > [Moderator's Note: Illinois Bell, among other Bell telcos, offers this
- > service in a limited number of areas. Our version allows two or three
- > other numbers to be camped on the main line.
-
- This is one of the things (along with Centrex, pagers, answering
- services, and other heavy DID customers) that is responsible for the
- depletion of our NPAs. CLASS could eliminate much of the waste. For
- instance, answering services would see which customer was forwarding
- to their *one* number and answer accordingly. No DID required.
-
- Distinctive ringing could function based on the number of the caller,
- not the number called. Granted, the functionality would be slightly
- different, but would be a good, efficient alternative.
-
- For some reason (probably the availability of cheap DID), vast blocks
- of numbers have been assigned for the use of what can best be
- described as "signaling" services. This is exactly what distinctive
- ringing is: two numbers are assigned just so the phone will ring
- differently, signaling the called party what number the caller dialed.
- What a waste.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: One of the Illinois Bell CLASS features does just
- what you propose: It allows the callee to designate up to ten callers
- whose calls will generate a different sounding ring. Unfortunatly,
- there is only one 'different sound' -- up to ten numbers you designate
- will have this characteristic. And of course, until they are likewise
- in an office properly equipped, merely designating them on your end
- does not make them behave that way. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Paul S. R. Chisholm" <psrc@pegasus.att.com>
- Subject: Re: Telephones, Technology and Media
- Date: 25 May 90 04:24:24 GMT
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- In article <8066@accuvax.nwu.edu> jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (j. eric
- townsend) writes:
-
- > If you are asked to give an interview on say, PBX security, offer to
- > review the reporter's story before they submit it.
-
- In article <8120@accuvax.nwu.edu> somebody wrote:
-
- > In connection with the times I sat for interviews regarding the
- > Internet Worm, I always offered just such a service. Almost
- > uniformly, the response was a semi-hostile glare followed by "our
- > editors have a policy of not allowing our stories to be censored."
-
- In article <8166@accuvax.nwu.edu>, jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (j. eric townsend)
- suggests some nicer ways of putting this, so you won't be accused of
- censorship. (Make it an offer, and make it clear that you only want to
- help them get the technology right.)
-
- I've written a few articles for PC MAGAZINE. This mostly bi-weekly
- periodical runs under a *much* looser schedule than a daily newspaper
- (thanks to Tom Neff for the description of what newspapers are like).
- Reviewers were required to summarize the factual statements, and go
- over them with the vendors; e-mailing the draft, or reading over the
- phone, was standard practice. There was *no* requirement to let the
- vendors challenge a writer's opinions or conclusions.
-
- It did take some time when I had to work around a PR flack. If I had
- a good technical contact (who was *allowed* to answer such questions
- from the press), it only took a few minutes.
-
-
- Paul S. R. Chisholm, AT&T Bell Laboratories
- att!pegasus!psrc, psrc@pegasus.att.com, AT&T Mail !psrchisholm
- The above is a statement of fact about one company's practice at one
- time, and possibly today. "PC", believe it or not, is a registered
- trademark of Ziff Communications Co., as is "PC Magazine".
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 18:26:02 PDT
- From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
- Subject: Re: Online CCITT Standards -- There is a Way!
-
-
- rpw3%rigden.wpd@sgi.com (Rob Warnock) wrote:
-
- > The CCITT (and ANSI and IEEE) standards
- > are copyrighted, and the standards organizations are largely supported
- > through the sales of their standards documents. They would disappove
- > strongly of anyone typing in one of their docs and putting it online.
-
- > CCITT/ISO/IEEE/ANSI != RFC. (Too bad.)
-
- > It is often the case that *draft* standards are available for free
- > (hardcopy only) while the standard is being developed... But once the
- > standard is finalized, you can't get the drafts (at any price).
-
- It's in the interest of these organizations to make standards
- expensive. It is counter to the interests of the users (who wrote the
- standards).
-
- These standards are *all* written by committees made up of whoever
- wants to participate. The standards bureacracies just do [a small
- part of] the administrative work involved. Most of the work is
- donated by committee members and their companies, particularly the
- chairman.
-
- Suppose the standards committee explicitly placed the final draft copy
- into the public domain. Better yet, the editor of the standard and/or
- the committee could copyleft the standard.
-
- If the final draft standard is public domain, the CCITT (et al) will
- be able to claim a copyright on the version they publish -- but anyone
- will be able to pass around the identical final draft in electronic
- form at no cost. Furthermore, there are actually regulations and/or
- laws against companies selling things to the government that are
- public domain, so it might end up that the CCITT would be in violation
- of those laws in so far as it sold copies of the standard to
- governments.
-
- If the final draft standard is copylefted [copyright by someone, with
- an explicit notice that it and derived works can only be redistributed
- if the recipient can redistribute under the same terms], even the
- versions you might buy from CCITT will have to permit copying by
- xerography as well as by OCR and posting-to-the-net.
-
- The ownership of a document written by a committee has probably been
- addressed somewhere but it's clear it isn't a work-for-hire since the
- CCITT, etc, are not paying them to write it. They're volunteers
- working toward a common goal. So they collectively own it and can
- decide on its fate.
-
- I'm sure the first committee to do this would get a lot of pressure
- from the standards org but in the end if the committee stands firm,
- there is nothing the bureaucraps can do except to refuse the draft
- copy, start another committee, and hope it doesn't happen again. Of
- course, the same people can join the new committee -- if it ain't open
- to the public, it ain't developing a public standard. Meanwhile, the
- industry will implement the draft, since it will be widely available,
- and will start noticing that maybe they don't need these dinosaur
- bureacracies getting in their way anyway.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb@presto.ig.com>
- Subject: Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD Long Distance Discount
- Date: 25 May 90 01:03:48 GMT
- Organization: IntelliGenetics, Inc., Mountain View, Calif. USA
-
-
- In the referenced article, CER2520@ritvax.bitnet (Curtis E. Reid) writes:
-
- > I heard a disturbing news that AT&T may consider removing the TDD Long
- > Distance Toll Call discounts when AT&T does its own billing. The
- > rationale for this is that no other services like MCI or Sprint offer
- > this discount so why should AT&T.
-
- > AT&T has a strong loyal base of handicapped and disabled customers.
- > If something like this discount goes away, I'm sure that other
- > services for handicapped customers will also go away, too.
-
- > Can any TELECOM readers comment on this? AT&T, don't consider
- > removing TDD discounts!!
-
- Please don't take this the wrong way, but what is the justification
- for discounts for TDD customers? I can see doing it if the bandwidth
- of TDD devices is so much smaller than voice that deaf people are
- effectively paying more for less effective use of the same circuit for
- the same amount of time as hearing people, but I have not heard that
- argument brought up. (And in which case I think there is a good
- argument for the discount, or at least a special TDD rate structure.)
-
- I don't object to AT&T's providing special services to TDD users that
- cost AT&T extra but are required in order to make TDD service work
- (e.g., TDD operator/trouble reporting services) but I don't see the
- reason for giving a certain class of people a discount simply because
- of a disability (or because of their race, religion, ethnic origin,
- etc.). Discounts for the economically disadvantaged are another case
- entirely, and while I do not think that general ratepayers (or telco
- shareholders) should have to subsidize "lifeline" service, telcos
- offer such services because they are required to by state regulators.
- I assume there is no such requirement for AT&T, MCI, Sprint, or others
- providing LD service but not dial tone.
-
-
- Michael C. Berch
- mcb@presto.ig.com / uunet!presto.ig.com!mcb / ames!bionet!mcb
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 18:40:33 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: New Phone Tax Hits California Users
-
-
- The {Los Angeles Times} reports that telephone customers in Los
- Angeles and throughout the state will pay an increased tax of 3.4% on
- their long-distance calls within California, effective July 1, to help
- pay for basic telephone service for low-income households.
-
-
- PT
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Switchboard Operations
- Date: 24 May 90 21:23:29 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- On May 24 at 7:19, TELECOM Moderator writes:
-
- > To really see just how stupid people can be, try running a
- > switchboard for a few months/years.
-
- Not for months or years, but I have, on occasion, tended the
- switchboard for a couple of my clients for the afternoon. My clients
- are radio stations with good sized PBXs. What calls them can only be
- described as an alternative species. At the AOR (Album Oriented Rock)
- station, there are apparently subhuman types that grunt things like,
- "Kenuplay grateflded?" "I'm sorry, you will have to call the "Jock
- Line" [sounds like something from a fitness center, or a outlet that
- sells athletic supporters] "and talk to the person on the air."
- "Hayman, cnt you jst gifm da messge?" "OK, sure will." [RELEASE]
-
- Or how about, "Lemme talk to Bob Smith [salestype]"? "I'm sorry, Bob
- is out of the office. May I take a message?" "That [expletive deleted]
- is never in. You tell him that he has until 4:30 PM and that's that."
- [And that's that? Are they going to break his legs? Reposess his BMW?]
- CLICK! Message to Bob: "Unknown caller says you have until 4:30..."
-
- Oh, well. Sometime I'll have to tell you about the callers to the
- other station whose demographics have been described as "60 to
- deceased", if you can stay awake...
-
- > Finally I put up a little sign on the board which said,
- > "I am not a fast operator. Nor am I a slow operator. I am merely a
- > half-fast operator." PT]
-
- How about, "I'm in-operative"?
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #383
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa04528;
- 25 May 90 5:59 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa21693;
- 25 May 90 4:24 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab20623;
- 25 May 90 3:21 CDT
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 2:42:00 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #384
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005250242.ab22445@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Fri, 25 May 90 02:41:39 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 384
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development [John Gilmore]
- Alternate Reading For Telecom Folks: alt.fax Newsgroup [Nigel Allen]
- Meeting Notice: Florida OPC Discusses Caller ID [David Lesher]
- AT&T LD Directory Assistance Free Call Eliminated [David Lesher]
- TDD Specs [Tad Cook]
- Toronto Area Information Services [David Leibold]
- Re: Panel (ugh!) Switches [John Higdon]
- Re: Panel (ugh!) Switches [haynes@ucscc.ucsc.edu]
- Re: Looking For Telephone Equipment Retailers [John Higdon]
- Special AT&T Discount Period Tonight Only [TELECOM Moderator]
- Re: Getting the Phone Number You Want [David Tamkin]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 19:15:20 PDT
- From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
- Subject: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development
-
-
- I heard rumors of a digital cellular telephone standard among DSP
- folks, and tracked them down.
-
- The draft standard is called "IS 54" and its project number is 2215.
- It is currently not available anywhere; they ran out of the drafts,
- and it won't be published for about a month. This is your standards
- bureacracy serving *you*!
-
- The draft will eventually be published for public comment by EIA in DC
- (202 457 4900). The contact person there is Eric Schiml in the
- Telecommunications Industry Association upstairs, at +1 202 457 4990.
- The chairman of the committee is Peter Nurse of Novatel, at +1 403 295
- 4673.
-
- The description I have heard of the standard is that it is being
- rushed through in order to make more capacity in the cellular systems
- in major metro areas. By DSPing voice down to 8Kbits/sec, they can
- put three separate conversations on each existing cellular channel.
- Of course, the resulting voices are not nearly as intelligible, and
- it's probably all but useless for modem traffic. The three
- conversations are time-multiplexed onto the channel by synchronizing
- the three cellular phones to alternately transmit 5ms frames such
- that, when received at the cell after the speed-of-light transmission
- delay, they occur at different times and thus don't interfere.
-
- The standard makes no provision for data traffic and no provision for
- encryption, even though it is digital end-to-end. The engineers I've
- spoken with seem to think that its "privacy" will be improved because
- it's digital, i.e. a scanner won't be able to decode the interleaved
- binary signal. Of course, each phone built to this standard will have
- the circuitry to do that, and nobody will modify the ROMs or improve
- the scanners. More security-by-obscurity.
-
- I originally wanted to track down the committee to discuss the
- requirements of Dynabooks for reliable, nationwide, mobile digital
- data service. But these folks aren't doing anything like that. In
- fact, one engineer told me he thought Dynabooks were a bad idea
- because "people shouldn't be reading while they are driving"!!! The
- whole idea is to sell more yak-wuile-you-drive to yups, they don't
- have any idea where the real portable digital markets are at. Real
- workstations will be palm-sized and portable in 1993 or so, long
- before the telcos are ready to network them *cheaply* in an office or
- neighborhood while having them able to remain online on the net (at a
- price) while traveling all over the country. What hacker,
- stockbroker, student, reporter, ... would be without one? Anybody got
- an angle by which we can bypass the telcos and do it right while they
- blunder?
-
- The plan is to reallocate some of the current analog cellular
- frequencies for this IS 54 bastard digital cellular service, in
- crowded metro areas. Probably the small towns would never get this
- equipment. But what is worse is that the act of deploying it in a
- metro area will REDUCE the number of analog frequencies available.
- The people who already have cellular phones will get WORSE congestion
- and fewer frequencies. The people who buy new digital cellular phones
- will get shitty voice quality and phones that won't work at all in
- minor markets, or for modems or fax machines. The folks who want real
- mobile digital telecommunications, even at phone company prices, won't
- get anything. Ditto the folks who want real privacy on mobile phones.
- (Remember Heinlein's "hush and scramble" features in every phone? "We
- have the technology" -- we just aren't deploying it.)
-
- The only ones who win from IS 54 are the cellular carriers (who expand
- their customer base without deploying more cells) and the phone makers
- (who make people buy another phone as they crowd more early adopters
- into fewer analog channels). And guess who's writing this standard?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Alternate Reading For Telecom Folks: alt.fax Newsgroup
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 19:31:50 EDT
- From: Nigel Allen <contact!ndallen@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- Regular TELECOM Digest readers may be interested in alt.fax, a
- newsgroup dealing specifically with fax machines. I don't know who
- started it or where to pick it up, if your system doesn't already
- receive it.
-
- Another newsgroup in the alt.* hierarchy is alt.cosuard, where the
- long-running battle between Texas sysops and Southwestern Bell over
- which BBSes should be charged business rates is discussed.
-
-
- Nigel Allen
- 52 Manchester Avenue telephone (416) 535-8916
- Toronto, Ontario M6G 1V3 Canada
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: Meeting Notice: Florida OPC Discussing Caller ID
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 22:56:39 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
-
- NOTE: This is *NOT* a discussion topic. It is a meeting notice.
-
- The Florida Office of the Public Counsel is holding a meeting on {yep}
- Caller I.D. It's at Room 4, 18th floor, Metro-Dade Center on 30 May
- 1400-1700. It says here the Public Counsel represents consumers before
- Public Service Commission. I will NOT post details to c.d.t, but will
- email them on request.
-
- Remember: This is *NOT* a discussion topic. It is a meeting notice.
-
-
- A host is a host from coast to coast.....wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu
- & no one will talk to a host that's close............(305) 255-RTFM
- Unless the host (that isn't close)......................pob 570-335
- is busy, hung or dead....................................33257-0335
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: ATT LD Directory Assistance Free Call Eliminated
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 23:06:26 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
-
- According to an ad in MacPaper, ATT filed to drop its present allowance
- of one 'free' LD D.A. call per month, effective sometime this month.
-
-
- A host is a host from coast to coast.....wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu
- & no one will talk to a host that's close............(305) 255-RTFM
- Unless the host (that isn't close)......................pob 570-335
- is busy, hung or dead....................................33257-0335
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Tad Cook <ssc!tad@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
- Subject: TDD Specs
- Date: 24 May 90 19:29:37 GMT
- Organization: very little
-
-
- Where can I get signalling specifications for Terminal Devices for the
- Deaf? Does Bellcore or CCITT maintain these? Anyone know a good
- published source? I don't know much more than the fact that they use
- 45.45 baud Baudot code.
-
- If anyone wants to share some knowledge on this, call me at
- 800-824-9719 or 206-881-7000 between 7:30am-4pm PDT and ask for PAUL
- COOK.
-
-
- Tad Cook Seattle, WA Packet: KT7H @ N7HFZ.WA.USA.NA Phone: 206/527-4089
- MCI Mail: 3288544 Telex: 6503288544 MCI UW
- USENET:...uw-beaver!sumax!amc-gw!ssc!tad or, tad@ssc.UUCP
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Toronto Area Information Services
- Date: Wed, 23 May 90 19:43:41 EDT
- From: woody <contact!djcl@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- Here is a list of some Toronto (area 416) numbers that can use tones to
- access various information services...
-
- 947.3333 - Dial a Law - get (unofficial) Canadian legal advice on various stuff
-
- 393.7911 - Gray Coach - Toronto bus information schedules/fares
-
- 366.8411 - VIA Rail - train schedules/fares - unlike Gray Coach, you can
- get info on return trips as well
-
- 778.5555 - Tele Personals - personal and 'companion' ads, ranging from tame
- to ultra-perverted. Chat line available, men get charged a small
- fee by the minute, women go on free at last report (due to woman
- shortage).
-
- 393.4636 - Toronto Transit Commission just installed their own touch tone
- service. They seem to have a botch-up so far as one can dial,
- get the initial welcome that invites touch tone users to press
- their keys for general information. However, trying to get an
- operator after this can result in a busy signal after you connect
- with the initial welcome. Pay phone users must love this one.
- (and I got the busy signals just after rush hour at that...)
-
- Tonight, I noticed that the touch tone service on the TTC's
- info number was not in effect. Perhaps this is just
- experimental, or for peak times only.
-
- 238.1010 - Talking Yellow Pages - there are a number of these popping up
- in various cities - check your phone books for one near you.
-
-
- || djcl@contact.uucp / David Leibold
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Panel (ugh!) Switches
- Date: 24 May 90 22:20:27 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Jack Winslade <Jack.Winslade@f666.n285.z1.fidonet.org> writes:
-
- > I've been fascinated with the panel switches (Ma Bell's answer to Rube
- > Goldberg) ever since seeing an aging one in action back in 1971 or so.
-
- Panel was almost universal in San Francisco and Oakland up until the
- early 70's. Obviously, exchanges added in the '50s onward were
- crossbar and later, ESS, but there was a substantial penetration of
- these impressive machines. Having grown up in Oakland, I'll never
- forget the sound of the phone.
-
- > If I remember my facts correctly, the revertive pulse-counting method
- > was necessary because the speed of the rollers driving the rods up the
- > frames was not exact, and this provided the feedback necessary to
- > locate the correct contacts.
-
- That is correct, and it also accounted for the horrendous noise that
- you heard, particularly between dialed digits. These rollers would
- slip and slide, even with heavy maintenance. Sometimes the rods
- couldn't make it to their destination, and the call would fail. This
- is why the switch was so unreliable.
-
- > Another thing that I found peculiar to this particular installation
- > was that an adjoining #1 crossbar office was also equipped with this
- > type of revertive-pulse sending system, which made the crossbar office
- > look like a panel office as far as interoffice signaling was
- > concerned.
-
- This was a typical situation: panel offices were usually neighbored by
- #1 crossbar because they could be made to speak the same language,
- revertive pulsing. The down side of this was that panel was
- particularly incompatible with SXS, which is one reason you would have
- a lot of panel in an area (such as SF/Oakland) OR you would have a lot
- of SXS (such as LA). Fortunately, the crossbar became a life saver in
- that it could speak equally well to SXS or to panel and frequently
- served as a translating link between these offices.
-
- BTW, to the best of my knowledge, the Telephone Pioneers of San
- Francisco have a small, fully operative, section of a panel office
- somewhere in San Francisco. For a while it was located in the old
- Larkin St. CO, but I believe it has moved from there. (How on earth
- would anyone move such a thing?)
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 24 May 90 22:34:28 -0700
- From: 99700000 <haynes@ucscc.ucsc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Panel (ugh!) Switches
-
-
- >From: Jack Winslade <Jack.Winslade@f666.n285.z1.fidonet.org>
-
- >Another thing that I found peculiar to this particular installation
- >was that an adjoining #1 crossbar office was also equipped with this
- >type of revertive-pulse sending system, which made the crossbar office
- >look like a panel office as far as interoffice signaling was
- >concerned.
-
- I remember when #1 ESS was new some at Bell Labs mentioned the irony
- that there were ESS offices signaling revertive pulsing to crossbar
- offices. The reason was that the ESS office had replaced a panel
- office and they didn't want to change all the trunks in the crossbar
- office to something more modern at the same time they were cutting
- over to the ESS.
-
- >[Moderator's Note: 1965 was about the time that Morris, IL also got an
- >experimental ESS office. PT]
-
- 1965?! Wasn't Morris the city in IL that had an earlier experimental
- ESS using vacuum tube and magnetic drum technology? Or do I have the
- city wrong? Or do you have the date wrong?
-
-
- Peter M. Weiss 31 Shields Bldg, University Park, PA USA 16802
-
- [Moderator's Note: Morris was the first, I believe, with vacuum tubes,
- etc. This would have been a few years earlier. Then about the time New
- Jersey got theirs, Morris also got a new system. That's the way I
- remember it. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Looking For Telephone Equipment Retailers
- Date: 24 May 90 20:32:55 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- "Daniel M. Rosenberg" <dmr@csli.stanford.edu> writes:
-
- > Hello Direct doesn't really have the stuff. Graybar in San Jose,
- > whoever they are, won't sell to me, because I don't have a "California
- > Reseller Certificate."
-
- Price the list you posted, contact me, and I'll be happy to pick up
- the stuff for you at Graybar. I have bought from them for years
- without the slightest problem (as an individual), and have never, ever
- shown them a resale certificate (and have always paid sales tax on the
- purchase).
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 2:11:55 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Special AT&T Discount Period Tonight Only
-
-
- This is sort of a late notice, but Friday night AT&T has a special one
- night only deal going on where all calls during the 5 PM - 10 PM
- period will be eleven cents per minute *or less* throughout the United
- States. This means the maximum cost for a ten minute call tonight only
- will be $1.10.
-
- AT&T is doing this as a special promotion to start off the three day
- holiday weekend of reduced calling rates.
-
- Obviously, you know how to route your long distance traffic tonight.
- For more specifics and verification, call AT&T Customer Service at
- 1-800-222-0300.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 02:24 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: Getting the Phone Number You Want
-
-
- M. G. Stinnett wrote in volume 10, issue 379:
-
- |Another thing to do when calling for service is to let the rep know
- |exactly the nature of the service you want, even if you think you already
- |know what features you need. My wife took a call from one man who wanted
- |two lines with automatic transfer and a few other things. She asked a
- |few questions and then suggested a system they had (CaroLine, I think)
- |which had all the features he needed plus a few more, and which would
- |save him over $100 a month compared to the system he asked for. Of
- |course, she cost the company some revenue, but bought a very satisfied
- |customer.
-
- She cost Northwestern Bell nothing and saved them a bit of work and a
- lot of annoyance. In a short time the customer would have found out
- about CaroLine anyway and demanded a retroactive refund from
- Northwestern Bell for the difference in cost and a switch to CaroLine
- without a service charge for the change. Moreover, he'd have
- complained left and right about the rep who misled him when he first
- started service and gotten her into trouble.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #384
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa05475;
- 26 May 90 0:41 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa18860;
- 25 May 90 22:50 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa13789;
- 25 May 90 21:45 CDT
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 21:30:26 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #385
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005252130.ab16084@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Fri, 25 May 90 21:30:27 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 385
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Choosing No Long Distance Carrier (was: I Have no LDC) [John Higdon]
- Re: Choosing No Long Distance Carrier (was: I Have no LDC) [Steve Forrette]
- Re: Interesting East Berlin Number is West German Cellular [Steve Forrette]
- Re: The So-Called Long-Distance Add-on [Macy M. Hallock]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Dave Levenson]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [David Tamkin]
- Re: TDD Specs [Peter Weiss]
- Re: TDD Specs [Ken Harrenstien]
- Re: Telebit vs. Sprint [Stephen E. Grove]
- Re: Data Access Lines [Stephen E. Grove]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Choosing No Long Distance Carrier (was: I Have no LDC)
- Date: 24 May 90 20:45:07 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Brian Litzinger <brian@apt.bungi.com> writes:
-
- > Several people responded that having no default long distance carrier
- > can happen in the normal course of business. I.E. you just ask for no
- > long distance carrier.
-
- > Well, the PacBell representative I spoke with disagrees.
-
- Double Well, that representative should be reported. I order telephone
- lines constantly for remote broadcasts and other purposes where they
- want a phone on the site. These are the questions I am *always* asked
- and the answers I give:
-
- Jack type: RJ11C
-
- Touch tone: Yes
-
- LD Carrier: None
-
- "Fine, thank you for your order, Mr. Higdon."
-
- Ordering lines with no carrier is SOP. I'm beginning to believe that
- the greenest trainees are put in the residence service order
- department. Do what I do: whenever you order residence service (and
- I've ordered plenty of that in my time) ask immediately to speak to a
- supervisor. Say, "I have a complex order here and I don't want to have
- to repeat it all twice -- once to you and again to the person you will
- have to turn me over to." If you are dealing with service in the San
- Jose area, ask for Chris or Mrs. Ford at 811-5700.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 00:59:23 -0700
- From: Steve Forrette <forrette@cory.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: Choosing No Long Distance Carrier (was: I Have no LDC)
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- In article <8173@accuvax.nwu.edu> you write:
-
- >Well, the PacBell representative I spoke with disagrees. He said that
- >I must choose a default long distance carrier.
-
- When I had two lines installed in PacBell territory this past January,
- I had no problems when I requested no long distance carrier, other
- than a somewhat confused "Why would anyone want to do that?"
- Furthermore, the PacBell rep told me that I would have six months to
- change it to the carrier of my choice for free - after that, it would
- cost me the $5 or whatever it is. I recently made my selection, and
- the rep indeed said "Oh, I see ... Your service is less than six
- months old, so there's no charge."
-
- BTW, I had done this for security reasons, hoping that it would throw
- off someone tapping into my line. (I'm not all that paranoid - there
- have been several instances of this during the past year where I
- live). When I first signed up for service, the rep indicated that the
- error recording would be non-descript. But, actually, it was quite
- descriptive. Basically, it said "This call requires a long distance
- company access code. Please hang up and redial the call using the
- code." My second line was on another exchange (#5 xbar of all
- things), and that recording went as far as directing me to the Yellow
- Pages to find long distance companies to call!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 01:27:16 -0700
- From: Steve Forrette <forrette@cory.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: Interesting East Berlin Number is West German Cellular
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- In article <8216@accuvax.nwu.edu> you write:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 381, Message 8 of 12
-
- >> If you are considering doing business in Eastern Europe,
- >> call Salomon Brothers in East Berlin at 49-161-2610935.
-
- >At the time of this writing, you get the recording "Zu diesem
- >Anschluss besteht zur Zeit keine Funkverbindung" which means "There is
- >currently no radio contact with this station." The phone is turned
- >off or has been out of range for a long time; there's a different
- >recording if the phone is out of range but has been within range in
- >the last few minutes.
-
- All right, all right, you guys have really done it this time! I
- wanted to hear the German recording for myself, so I gave it a try.
- After a few seconds there was a single frequency tone that came on and
- off about every second. I thought "Hm, I wonder what that means?" I
- quickly inferred that it was a RINGING sound, as a click was heard,
- then "Goodentag" or however you spell it. A moment later, it was
- followed by a "uh, Hello?" I can't wait to get the bill!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: fmsystm!macy@cwjcc.ins.cwru.edu
- Date: Fri May 25 08:59:56 1990
- Subject: Re: The So-Called Long-Distance Add-on
- Organization: F M Systems, Inc. Medina, Ohio USA +1 216 723-3000
-
-
- >Now that the Baby Bells have grown up, does anyone see a chance of the
- >access charge being repealed?
-
- You are really asking: will the LEC's willingly give up this source of
- revenue? One that they do not have to justify before the state PUC's.
- one that they only have to calculate in the most cursory of manners to
- the FCC? One that the FCC has stipulated as fundemental to current
- rate structures? One that benefits the LEC's without creating any
- controversy or negative publicity?
-
- To put it mildly: I think not.
-
- IMHO, only a complete revamp of national telecommunications policy
- accompanied by a redesign of mandated LEC accounting procedures would
- ever allow this to happen. Telecom policy is not a priority of anyone
- in government, at least anyone I know of who might be able to make it
- happen. Mark me down as skeptical....
-
-
- Macy M. Hallock, Jr. macy@ncoast.org uunet!aablue!fmsystm!macy
- F M Systems, Inc. {uunet|backbone}!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!fmsystm!macy
- 150 Highland Drive Voice: +1 216 723-3000 Ext 251 Fax: +1 216 723-3223
- Medina, Ohio 44256 USA Cleveland:273-3000 Akron:239-4994 (Dial 251 at tone)
- (Please note that our system name is "fmsystm" with no "e", .NOT. "fmsystem")
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dave Levenson <dave%westmark@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Date: 25 May 90 21:38:40 GMT
- Organization: Westmark, Inc., Warren, NJ, USA
-
-
- In article <8230@accuvax.nwu.edu>, johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us
- (John R. Levine) writes:
-
- [in Jew Jersey]:
- > I was surprised to discover that any number that I could dial as seven
- > digits, I could also dial as 1-609-NNX-XXXX. This included local,
- > intra-lata, and inter-lata calls. (My beach house is in one of the
- > smallest latas in the country, consting of the small and not very
- > populous strip of the 609 NPA along the coast.)
-
- I have noticed that I can use the home area code everywhere I've tried
- it in New Jersey. This includes a half-dozen central offices in the
- North Jersey LATA (201 and 908).
-
-
- Dave Levenson Voice: 201 647 0900 Fax: 201 647 6857
- Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave
- Warren, NJ, USA AT&T Mail: !westmark!dave
- [The Man in the Mooney]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 19:12 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
-
-
- In volume 10, issue 382, Mark Brader offered one reason that eleven-
- digit local dialing is forbidden where it isn't required:
-
- |Implementation issues aside,
-
- Political implementation or engineering implementation?
-
- |there is a simple reason to forbid it, one which has certainly been
- |mentioned in this forum in the past.
-
- Mr. Brader's explanation boiled down to this: Mother is as positive as
- ever that she knows what is best for us better than we know ourselves,
- and if we dial any sequence we don't *have* to, it can't be that we
- have our reasons for doing something we thought of on our own. No, we
- helplessly stupid customers must have made a mistake, so she's going
- to protect us from ourselves by forbidding whatever she doesn't
- require. That way we're relieved of thinking. How nice of her. That
- way she's relieved of admitting that we can think. How nice for her.
- It's another case of "We don't let you suspend Call Waiting any more
- because people who did were missing important calls."
-
- |Certainly it is not that strong a reason, but in the traditional
- |environment where people were NOT carrying telephones with memories
- |{nor laptop computers --DWT} all over the place, it was the most
- |relevant one.
-
- The traditional environment where Mother knows all and customers know
- nothing, that is. I'm not taking it out on Mr. Brader and don't want
- this to sound as if I were; I'm peed at the telco attitude.
-
- Near my home a frontier between two telco satrapies repeatedly abuts,
- crosses, adjoins, tickles, body-slams, splatters, and generally abuses
- the three borderlines between 708 and 312. Living here, I know the
- boundaries very well, but most people who pass through do not and
- often tend to guess wrong about which town they're in. The area here
- is infested with COCOTs, particularly in the Illinois Bell portions.
- Many of them have no telephone numbers on their faces; those that do
- often have only seven digits or still read "312" even though they are
- now in 708.
-
- Most Illinois Bell pay phones have just a sticker to put "708" over
- "312" (and you cannot tell one that really is in 312 from one in 708
- whose sticker fell off unless you know the exact boundaries or know
- which prefixes are which) and their instruction cards speak
- generically of "this area code" and "other area codes." (During the
- grace period I saw a 708 sticker on a payphone in what was to remain
- in 312. The owner of the business told me that someone from Illinois
- Bell had come in, told him his location would be in 708, and put the
- sticker onto the coin phone; I suggested he check with Illinois Bell
- again before changing his stationery.)
-
- As for COCOTs, forget about any clarity in dialing instructions. Most
- of them have no instruction cards at all or silly generic ones that
- equate "local calls" with seven-digit dialing and "long-distance
- calls" with eleven-digit dialing. And of course, God forbid that a
- COCOT should bear its own number so that you know which area code
- you're dialing from if you don't have the boundary line memorized.
-
- So when you want to place a call from an unlabeled pay phone that is,
- let's say, in 312, to another number in 312, but you think you are in
- 708 and dial 1312 in front, you can't get through (and COCOTs probably
- don't tell you what went wrong nor return your money). There's no
- reason for that. It makes no sense whatever.
-
- Centel-owned coin phones are very clear about it: their instruction
- cards state "You are dialing from area code 312" or "You are dialing
- from area code 708." They still don't let you dial eleven digits
- within your own NPA if you wish, but there is less reason to try.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Penn State University
- Date: Friday, 25 May 1990 07:15:41 EDT
- From: Peter Weiss <PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Subject: Re: TDD Specs
-
-
- Though not necessarily an answer to your question, the
- telecom-archives available FTP lcs.mit.edu has a file called
- deaf.communicate.on.tdd which contains pointers to other archive
- files.
-
-
- Peter M. Weiss | 31 Shields Bldg | University Park, PA USA 16802
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 18:06:31 PDT
- From: Ken Harrenstien <KLH@nic.ddn.mil>
- Subject: Re: TDD Specs
-
-
- [Posting a response is easier than calling those phone numbers.]
-
- I recall that the TDD manufacturers, under EIA auspices, were working
- on a standard to pin down all of the various TDD specifications. I
- don't know, however, if the EIA actually has a final result or not.
- My guess would be not, but it's certainly worth a try. I don't have a
- number handy but their office is in the other Washington (DC); try
- asking directory assistance for the Electronic Industries Association.
- Let us know if there's any news!
-
- Basically the old-style TDDs use 5-bit Baudot (American Communications
- set), 1.5 stop bit, 45.45 baud, with the Weitbrecht modem (U.S. Pat.
- No. 3,507,997 if you must know). The latter is half-duplex, 1400Hz
- mark, 1800Hz space, plus a somewhat undefined 100ms "holding tone"
- duration after last bit (otherwise the quiescent marking state would
- maintain a continuous 1400Hz tone).
-
- I don't know of any easily available published references. They do
- exist; we even wrote some of them as SRI project reports (you don't
- think I memorize patent numbers, do you?), but they're hard to get.
- That's why I suggest finding out if the EIA has come out with anything
- yet. Maybe Curtis Reid, another TDD-cognizant Telecom reader, knows
- of other alternatives. You can always send direct e-mail if you have
- specific technical questions.
-
-
- Ken
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "S. E. Grove" <seg@pacbell.com>
- Subject: Re: Telebit vs. Sprint
- Date: 25 May 90 17:20:52 GMT
- Reply-To: "S. E. Grove" <seg@pacbell.com>
- Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
-
-
- Pac Bell has a dial up distribution network that they have called
- PacNet. But the fiber optic network for internal company use only, is
- call PBNet. The reason for the internal company use only is that we
- are not allowed to switch calls interlata, except for ourselves. If
- AT&T sent a message over PacNet to Pac Bell it would most likely
- travel on PBNet.
-
-
- Stephen Grove
- Comm. Tech. ESS Pac Bell Sonoma County, Calif
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "S. E. Grove" <seg@pacbell.com>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Date: 25 May 90 18:06:35 GMT
- Reply-To: "S. E. Grove" <seg@pacbell.com>
- Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
-
-
- In article <8084@accuvax.nwu.edu> jgro@apldbio.com (Jeremy Grodberg)
- writes:
-
- > Technical Standards for Data Access Lines
- > Attenuation Distortion (slope) -1 to +3 dB
- > C-Message Noise 20 dBrnC
- > Impulse Noise 59 dBrnCO
- > Relative Delay (1000 to 2604 Hz) 200 usec.
-
- SLOPE means no more than 1 db higher than the reference level of 1khz
- measured with 900 ohms impedance, and no more than 3 db greater loss
- that the reference. This is measured in the range of 300hz to 3000hz,
- unless you ask and pay for higher line conditioning, C4 is measured up
- to 3400hz, if I remember. All my books are in a locker and therefore
- not available.
-
- C-message noise 0 dbrn is equivalent to -65 db (again I am relying on
- memory, and I haven't lined up data circuits for a living for ten
- years), the c refers to a weighting filter, calculated to reduce the
- effect of noise at frequencies that don't effect the data.
-
- Impulse noise is noise of very short duration, sometimes unnoticable
- to the human ear, but at the speed of 9600 Baud a real deterrent.
-
- Relative Delay has to do with the delay of various frequencies
- reaching the terminating modem in reference to the fastest frequency,
- within the bandwith. The fastest frequency can vary, though it is
- usually around 2400hz. This could affect the shape of the analog
- envelope of the signal and make it harder for the detection circuits
- in the modem to determine space or mark.
-
- At 9600 baud you are dealing with a 209 type data set which uses tri
- bits (000,001,010,011,etc) to reduce the actual line speed and eight
- phase 'phase modulation'.
-
-
- Stephen Grove Pac Bell, Comm. Tech. ESS; Sonoma County, Calif.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #385
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa07474;
- 26 May 90 1:27 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa20678;
- 25 May 90 23:54 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab18860;
- 25 May 90 22:51 CDT
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 22:11:06 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #386
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005252211.ab22715@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Fri, 25 May 90 22:10:58 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 386
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: FCC REN Numbers [Tad Cook]
- Re: FCC REN Numbers [Julian Macassey]
- Re: Interstate, IntraLATA Calling [John Cowan]
- Re: Who are the Biggest Users of Telecom? [John R. Levine]
- Re: Correction to 908 Areacode Exchange List [Stan M. Krieger]
- Re: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development [Christopher Pikus]
- Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD LD Discount [Ken Harrenstein]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Tad Cook <ssc!tad@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN Numbers
- Date: 25 May 90 22:18:14 GMT
- Organization: very little
-
-
- In article <8185@accuvax.nwu.edu>, 0004261818@mcimail.com (David
- Tamkin) writes:
-
- > In volume 10, issue 377, Julian Macassey answered some of Steve
- > Friedl's questions about FCC ringer equivalence numbers.
- > I have three far simpler ones (I guess):
-
- > 1. What does the B or A after an REN mean?
-
- A B type ringer must respond to 16 to 68 Hz ringing frequency, and an
- A ringer only responds to 20 or 30 Hz, +/- 3 Hz.
-
- > 2. If the ringer on a telephone can be turned off, does it no longer
- > count in figuring the total REN load on a line?
-
- A phone with the ringer turned off SHOULD have no REN load on the
- line, but I could imagine an electronic ringer that still has it's
- detector across the line, but the sound source is off.
-
- > 3. Two of my modems *do* have REN's, though neither has any sort of
- > bell or gong. They check in at "0.4 1.2B" and "0.5A 1.6B"
- > respectively. My other modem has a speaker and thus does make a noise
- > (but the speaker is powered by the electric utility, not the telco);
- > it has an FCC ID but no REN on it at all.
-
- What's the question?
-
- There are other ringer types (A thru N) for different ringing
- frequencies. The B type is not frequency selective, but all of the
- others are. This allows frequency selective ringing on party lines.
-
- In article <7911@accuvax.nwu.edu>, tell@oscar.cs.unc.edu (Stephen
- Tell) writes:
-
- > > What is the conversion factor between RENs and somthing your average
- > > EE can understand, like "milliamps at 90vrms, 20Hz?"
-
- A ringing generator that is capable of powering 5 REN should be able
- to supply ABOUT 5 watts.
-
-
- Tad Cook Seattle, WA Packet: KT7H @ N7HFZ.WA.USA.NA Phone: 206/527-4089
- MCI Mail: 3288544 Telex: 6503288544 MCI UW
- USENET:...uw-beaver!sumax!amc-gw!ssc!tad or, tad@ssc.UUCP
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Julian Macassey <julian@bongo.uucp>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN Numbers
- Date: 26 May 90 01:41:14 GMT
- Organization: The Hole in the Wall Hollywood California U.S.A.
-
-
- In article <8185@accuvax.nwu.edu>, 0004261818@mcimail.com (David
- Tamkin) writes:
-
- > In volume 10, issue 377, Julian Macassey answered some of Steve
- > Friedl's questions about FCC ringer equivalence numbers.
- > I have three far simpler ones (I guess):
-
- > 1. What does the B or A after an REN mean?
-
- I think I covered this in an earlier posting, but then I could
- have glossed over it. The letter at the end of the REN numbers covers
- the "Ringing type" from the notorious Table I. A Ringing type A ringer
- is sensitive to 20 Hz +-3 and 30 Hz +-3. A B type ringer is sensitive
- to AC voltage between 15.3 and 68.0 Hz. Just for the curious, a C type
- ringer is sensitive between 15.3 and 17.4 Hz. There are many classes
- of ringers. I know that the class is supposed to refer to the
- frequency coverage, but owing to obscurity in the FCC regs, some labs
- measure type B ringers (Electronic warble type) as a type A so they
- can get a lower REN.
-
- This does not make it a type A ringer. This makes it a type B ringer
- measured as a type B. Apart from type B, other ringers cover a narrow
- frequency range. This frequency selectivity is sometimes used with
- party lines. It is also one of the factors that limits bell tap in US
- phones. See an earlier posting of mine where I waffle about this. Yes,
- most Type B ringers will also respond to frequencies above 68 Hz, like
- 100 Hz.
-
- > 2. If the ringer on a telephone can be turned off, does it no longer
- > count in figuring the total REN load on a line?
-
- I wish this was true. If you look carefully, you will notice
- that only the output transducer (fancy name for gong, Loudspeaker or
- piezo disc) is disconnected, but that the power consuming stuff is
- still on line. In a gong ringer the "off button" is often an arm that
- obstructs the striker, so no power is saved by turning it off. With
- electronic ringers, depending on the design, some power may be saved.
- I have quietly campaigned to have the off switch disconnect the ringer
- from the line. It does not disconnect the ringer because, it always
- used to be that way. But that was then when there was maybe only one
- instrument on the line. These days, you may want the ringer off,
- because you have too many on line. To take a ringer off line you have
- to actually disconnect it internally.
-
- In the old days, the gong ringer circuit was left in circuit at all
- times so the telco could sling an AC test circuit down the line at the
- dead of night and the ringer provided a return path. Note recent
- postings about strange telephone modems etc going chirp in the night.
- They also had records of your normal impedance, so any change could
- tell them if water was seeping into the line etc. It also told them
- that you had bootlegged a phone on the line. They then got snotty.
- Most techie types then learned to disconnect the ringer on any
- bootlegged phones. Now many residential lines have tons of ringers on
- them and they change continually - must drive the test board guys nuts
- - any comments from CO types? Most electronic ringers do not provide
- a good profile to telco test circuits, the exception I know about is
- the Motorola ringer IC. Motorola does it with a chain of Zeners.
-
- So one other point, the "low" or "medium" switch on most
- electronic ringers is in fact a resistor switched between the ringer
- IC and the transducer, so the volume is low, but the power consumption
- is often just as high. My ideal electronic ringer would have the low
- switch put the resistor on the line before the ringer IC and the off
- switch would remove the whole circuit from the line. Yes, I know that
- if the "low" resistor is before the IC, it will make the circuit
- touchy in the low mode, depending on available power it would either
- make no difference in volume or silence the bugger entirely.
-
- > 3. Two of my modems *do* have REN's, though neither has any sort of
- > bell or gong. They check in at "0.4 1.2B" and "0.5A 1.6B"
- > respectively. My other modem has a speaker and thus does make a noise
- > (but the speaker is powered by the electric utility, not the telco);
- > it has an FCC ID but no REN on it at all.
-
- If the REN is below a 0.1 REN, it can be listed as 0.0 or
- nothing at all put on the label. See above for dreary details on the
- funny A and B numbers. In truth, all modems I have seen are type B
- ringers. To prove this, feed say 60V at 60 Hz (yes power via a regular
- transformer) to a modem, betya it picks up if in answer mode.
-
- I wrote extensively about all this ringer stuff years ago in
- Popular Communications mag, but I suppose it wasn't all that popular
- then. Plus of course the editors used to bugger and censor my text so
- some of the more esoteric stuff was jumbled and meaningless by the
- time it reached the public and vulgar gaze.
-
-
- Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo.info.com ucla-an!denwa!bongo!julian
- N6ARE@K6IYK (Packet Radio) n6are.ampr.org [44.16.0.81] voice (213) 653-4495
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: John Cowan <cowan@marob.masa.com>
- Subject: Re: Interstate, IntraLATA Calling
- Reply-To: John Cowan <cowan@marob.masa.com>
- Organization: ESCC, New York City
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 13:39:29 GMT
-
-
- In article <8235@accuvax.nwu.edu> cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) writes:
-
- >Bell of Pa. & NJ Bell are authorized as carriers between Philadelphia
- >(Pa.) metro and nearby New Jersey areas. A similar setup exists
- >between northern New Jersey and New York City. (I don't know about
- >suburbs in 914 area in New York State.)
-
- Westchester County (area code 914) is part of the NYC LATA, which also
- includes all of Long Island (516), Rockland County (across the river
- from Westchester), and parts of other counties, including a bit of
- Connecticut (area code 203), which is served by NYTel for historical
- reasons.
-
- On another topic currently agitating the Digest: I believe that
- 1-212-7D works OK within the 212 area, but haven't checked lately. It
- may depend on one's CO.
-
-
- cowan@marob.masa.com (aka ...!hombre!marob!cowan)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: Who are the Biggest Users of Telecom?
- Organization: Segue Software, Cambridge MA
- Date: 25 May 90 13:08:24 EDT (Fri)
- From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us>
-
-
- In article <8209@accuvax.nwu.edu> Our Moderator writes:
-
- > 8. Texas Air
-
- That's very peculiar. I'd expect that the telecom needs of an airline
- would be partly hooking up all of their own offices and terminals, but
- even more hooking up all of the travel agencies that subscribe to
- their CRS. American's Sabre and United's Apollo are much more widely
- used than is Texas Air's System One, and American and United are
- enormous airlines in their own right. (United sold Apollo to a
- nominally separate organization called Covia, but I'd have thought
- they'd take the telecom with them.) It's hard to believe that Texas
- Air uses more telecom than either AMR or UAL.
-
- > 15. BellSouth
- > 89. US West
-
- I thought the RBOCs were roughly the same size. Admittedly, Bell
- South has bought a lot of cellular operators outside their own area,
- but it's hard to imagine a disparity like this.
-
- There's no doubt that all of the organizations on the list are huge
- telecom users, but I wouldn't give much credence to the ranking.
-
-
- Regards,
- John Levine, johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us, {spdcc|ima|lotus}!esegue!johnl
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 15:03:09 EDT
- From: S M Krieger <smk@attunix.att.com>
- Subject: Re: Correction to 908 Areacode Exchange List
- Organization: Summit NJ
-
-
- > Please add the following to your lists.
-
- > 841 STROUDSBG NJ
-
- Unless the Delaware River shifted in the last three days, I thought
- Stroudsburg was in PA.
-
- Also, the following little tidbits of information appeared in a phone
- bill insert:
-
- 1. The use of 908 will be mandatory on June 8, 1991.
-
- 2. The 908 area code will first appear in the Monmouth
- County phone book, which will come out on June 14, 1990.
-
- 3. 908 is functional.
-
- 4. We will still be able to use 7 digits for all local calls
- (which in the case of my Summit, NJ central office, means
- that calls to Millburn, Madison, and South Orange will
- remain at 7 digits).
-
- What I am curious about though is how many central office
- codes will this tie up in both 201 and 908?
-
-
- Stan Krieger
- Summit, NJ
- ...!att!attunix!smk
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Christopher J. Pikus" <cjp%megatek.UUCP@ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development
- Date: 25 May 90 21:45:01 GMT
- Organization: Megatek Corporation, San Diego, Ca.
-
-
- From article <8244@accuvax.nwu.edu>, by gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore):
-
- > I heard rumors of a digital cellular telephone standard among DSP
- > folks, and tracked them down.
-
- > The draft standard is called "IS 54" and its project number is 2215.
-
- > The standard makes no provision for data traffic and no provision for
- > encryption, even though it is digital end-to-end. The engineers I've
-
- > The only ones who win from IS 54 are the cellular carriers (who expand
- > their customer base without deploying more cells) and the phone makers
- > (who make people buy another phone as they crowd more early adopters
- > into fewer analog channels). And guess who's writing this standard?
-
- An alternate path being explored is a joint project between
- Pac Bell Cellular in Los Angeles and Qualcomm in San Diego. I had an
- opportunity to view a technology demonstration last novenber.
-
- They are using something called CDMA (Code Division Multiple
- Access) that uses a technique similar to sattelite communications
- (Qualcomms expertise). All transmitters use the same frequency with no
- time division; each one running with output power down at the noise
- floor. Each phone convolves their voice data with a special 32 bit
- number which a digital modem at the other end searches for. Thus each
- phone is secure from each other (different keys); the others look like
- noise to each phone.
-
- As for datacomm, the data bandwidth is flexible, you pay for
- what you need, (with tradeoff in quality/datarate). i.e. 8/16 kbs for
- voice and 64 kbs for data. The bandwidth limitation is soft since as
- the channel hits capacity, the b.e.r. will slowly climb.
-
- At the technology demonstration, Pac Bell was saying that if
- they alloc'd 10% of their service (42 channels) to this digital, they
- could increase capacity by a factor of 2-3 FOR THE WHOLE SERVICE.
-
- The people at Qualcomm were saying that a phone could be built
- that swings both ways; current technology analog and this digital
- service with the addition of a few DSP chips.
-
- It appears that Pac Bell doesn't have time to wait for a
- standards commitee and decided that an early deployment of a superior
- system will create a de-facto standard.
-
-
- Regards,
-
- Christopher J. Pikus, Megatek Corp.
- INTERNET: cjp@megatek.uucp San Diego, CA
- UUCP: ...!uunet!megatek!cjp
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 17:34:43 PDT
- From: Ken Harrenstien <KLH@nic.ddn.mil>
- Subject: Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD Long Distance Discount
-
-
- >Please don't take this the wrong way, but what is the justification
- >for discounts for TDD customers? I can see doing it if the bandwidth
- >of TDD devices is so much smaller than voice that deaf people are
- >effectively paying more for less effective use of the same circuit for
- >the same amount of time as hearing people, but I have not heard that
- >argument brought up. (And in which case I think there is a good
- >argument for the discount, or at least a special TDD rate structure.)
-
- Indeed, this is the rationale. The standard figure in the literature
- I've seen has been a 5:1 ratio; that is, a conversation via TDD takes
- five times as long as a voice call to convey the same information.
- The discount, however, does NOT follow this ratio. I'm not sure
- exactly what it amounts to -- the one time I tried to get an
- explanation out of a telco billing person, I was told it just meant
- the lowest possible rate was applied (ie night rate) instead of the
- normal rate. The bill always simply says "DN". So it doesn't do me
- any good to schedule my calls for the evening instead of the daytime.
-
- One other aspect of this discount, at least here in California, is
- that it ONLY applies to calls made from a single line identified as
- belonging to a TDD subscriber. I cannot have two lines and have the
- discount on both. It also does NOT apply to calls I make with a
- calling card, or calls I charge to that number, or even calls made to
- that number. So in my opinion it's a pretty feeble gesture. You'd
- think the simple thing to do would be to just charge everything
- normally and factor the total by .50 or whatever, but no.
-
- Oh yeah, while I'm ranting about bills, any long-distance (but
- intrastate) charges I incur when using the California Relay Service
- are printed as calls to "Cal Relay" (instead of, say "San Jose" or
- "Sacramento"), even though they show the correct destination number.
- So it is a little harder for me to figure out where I was really
- calling. As for interstate calls, the Relay service can't call out of
- state -- no calls, no billing problem. Gee, maybe we should carry
- this idea to its logical extreme ... no telco, no telco hassles!
-
- I haven't heard anything about removing the discount, but I imagine it
- would be done quietly in any case. Someone did tell me a couple days
- ago about a radio report that AT&T would be introducing a nationwide
- TDD relay service, but I haven't seen anything in print, so this may
- only be a rumor or a misinterpretation.
-
-
- Ken
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #386
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa10091;
- 26 May 90 2:30 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab23795;
- 26 May 90 0:59 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ac20678;
- 25 May 90 23:54 CDT
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 23:32:13 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #387
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005252332.ab13074@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Fri, 25 May 90 23:31:48 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 387
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Distinctive Ringing Recognition [Rob Warnock]
- Re: Distinctive Ringing Recognition [Tad Cook]
- Re: Data Access Lines [John Higdon]
- Re: Customized Telephone Numbers (Was NXX-0000) [Subodh Bapat]
- Re: His Master's Voice [David Tamkin]
- Re: New Tax Hits California Users [Peter da Silva]
- Re: Sprint/WD40 Offer [Jeff Jonas]
- More on Stamford 1AESS Crash [Peter Neumann, RISKS via David Lesher]
- System 75 Question [Leslie Mikesell]
- Motorola's Products - Response to Chip Rosenthal [Gary Segal]
- 10-NYT and 10-NJB [Jeff Jonas]
- Memorial Day *Not* A Cell Phone Holiday? [TELECOM Moderator]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 03:18:30 GMT
- From: Rob Warnock <rpw3%rigden.wpd@sgi.com>
- Subject: Re: Distinctive Ringing Recognition
- Reply-To: Rob Warnock <rpw3@sgi.com>
- Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc., Mountain View, CA
-
-
- In article <8238@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- writes:
-
- | > The tone pattern is standard ring for my regular line, and two longs
- | > for the kiddie line.
- | This is one of the things (along with Centrex, pagers, answering
- | services, and other heavy DID customers) that is responsible for the
- | depletion of our NPAs. CLASS could eliminate much of the waste. For
- | instance, answering services would see which customer was forwarding
- | to their *one* number and answer accordingly. No DID required.
-
- I'm suddenly (if whimsically) struck by the analogy to computer
- networking. What we have had up 'til now is "hot to host"
- connections. Maybe (given the capabilities coming in ISDN) we need to
- add "port numbers" to our NPA plan? 1/2- ;-}
-
- So just like HostA connecting to hostB says what well-know service is
- wanted at hostB by specifying a port (a.k.a. socket) number, maybe
- there could be a way to append a port number ("sub-listing number"?)
- to a standard number:
-
- "Dial 1-800-555-1212-#57 for information regarding 'love lines'"
-
- or personalized listings in phone books:
-
- Doe, John E., family.....555-1212
- John E.................555-1212#31
- Mary Sue...............555-1212#32
- Billy..................555-1212#33
- Suzie..................555-1212#34
- BBS....................555-1212#38
- FAX....................555-1212#39
-
- And of course, if you could provide a *source* "port" number when
- placing a call (maybe with a *NN before the call?), you could
- authenticate yourself or provide distinctive ringing, or whatever.
- (Yes, I *know* the BSD hack of "ports < 1024" is not secure!)
-
- Just a thought... ;-}
-
-
- Rob Warnock, MS-9U/510 rpw3@sgi.com rpw3@pei.com
- Silicon Graphics, Inc. (415)335-1673 Protocol Engines, Inc.
- 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd.
- Mountain View, CA 94039-7311
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Tad Cook <ssc!tad@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: Distinctive Ringing Recognition
- Date: 25 May 90 21:48:28 GMT
- Organization: very little
-
-
- In article <8169@accuvax.nwu.edu>, dburke%vaxb.decnet@nusc-npt.navy.
- mil (VAXB::DBURKE) writes:
-
- > NYNEX (or NET) has just release something called RingMate (I
- > assume trademarked). This allows me to have two different incoming
- > telephone numbers, one for me and one for the kids, all tied to the
- > same telephones I have now, with a distinctive ringing feature to
- > allow me to recognize which number is being called. This is a nice
- > feature, except I'd like to get a black box that will switch to
- > answering machine A for me and answering machine B for the kids.
-
- > Is there such a box?
-
- I have used a service like this for adding a fax machine to a voice
- line without the annoyance of those darn "fax switches" that attempt
- to switch the call after answer.
-
- Check out the Autoline Plus, from:
-
- ITS Communications Corp.
- Endicott, NY 13760
- Phone: 800-333-0802
-
- Sorry, but I don't have a street address or non-WATS telephone number.
-
- This box has three outputs for up to three numbers assigned to one
- line. If you tell them you are a dealer, you can get a sample for
- under $100. It works great!
-
-
- Tad Cook Seattle, WA Packet: KT7H @ N7HFZ.WA.USA.NA Phone: 206/527-4089
- MCI Mail: 3288544 Telex: 6503288544 MCI UW
- USENET:...uw-beaver!sumax!amc-gw!ssc!tad or, tad@ssc.UUCP
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Date: 24 May 90 21:40:57 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Chip Rosenthal <chip@chinacat.unicom.com> writes:
-
- > dBm is commonly used to specify a level referenced to a "digital
- ^^^^^^^
- > milliwatt" signal. This is a 1004Hz sine wave of 1mW power into
- > 600ohms.
-
- What was it before digital technology? I've always heard it referred
- to as simply the "milliwatt". Also, to be technically pure, dBm can be
- a reference to one milliwatt into any impedance, as long as it's a
- milliwatt. The 600 ohms comes into play because everyone knows that
- that when you measure 0.775 volts on across 600 ohms, you have a
- milliwatt. If you measure 0.949 volts across 900 ohms, you still have
- a milliwatt. And it is still 0 dBm.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Bapat <mailrus!uflorida!rm1!bapat@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Customized Telephone Numbers (Was NXX-0000)
- Date: 25 May 90 18:10:14 GMT
- Organization: the boundary between UNIX and sanity
-
-
- Does anyone out there have the source for a C program (or possibly an
- awk script) to take a given seven-letter string and map it to its
- corresponding seven-digit sequence using a standard telephone keypad
- mapping?
-
- Also, how about the other way round - given a telephone number,
- generate from it all combinations of keypad-derivable seven-letter
- strings?
-
- (I'm tired of looking at my phone every time I want to do the
- translation - and too lazy to spend the few minutes it would take to
- write it!)
-
-
- Subodh Bapat novavax!rm1!bapat@uunet.uu.net OR bapat@rm1.uucp
- MS E-204, P.O.Box 407044, Racal-Milgo, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33340 (305) 846-6068
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 19:19 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: His Master's Voice
-
-
- Lou Judice wrote in volume 10, issue 382, about Illinois Bell's ad
- campaign that suggests phoning your answering machine at home to give
- your pet the reassurance of hearing your voice over the speaker:
-
- |I've had exactly the opposite problem. When my answering machine picks
- |up and someone talks, my two cats immediately jump up and start playing
- |with the buttons, invariably rewinding it, or in one case, fast-
- |forwarding it to the end of the tape. I've turned the volume all the way
- |down to avoid missed messages.
-
- That pretty much explains why Illinois Bell always features dogs in
- the print ads and television commercials for this campaign. (There's
- also the factor that hearing your voice say its name doesn't mean
- diddly to the stereotypically aloof housecat of urban folklore.)
-
- Turning down the speaker when you're not home (and the speaker is
- therefore unneeded) is one solution if you can't find a cat-proof
- place for the answering machine. Others are switching to voice mail
- or replacing the answering machine's built-in speaker with one placed
- some distance away, so that the voice coming out of it will attract
- the cats to a location where they can do no harm.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
- Subject: Re: New Phone Tax Hits California Users
- Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
- Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 14:37:45 GMT
-
-
- In article <8242@accuvax.nwu.edu> telecom@eecs.nwu.edu (TELECOM
- Moderator) writes:
-
- > an increased tax of 3.4% on their long-distance calls within California,...
- > to help pay for basic telephone service for low-income households.
-
- Isn't this supposed to be included in your phone bill anyway?
- Universal service, and all that stuff.
-
-
- Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180.
- <peter@ficc.ferranti.com> <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
-
- [Moderator's Note: Well, you would think so. I guess the California
- legislature disagrees. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jeff Jonas <synsys!jeffj@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Sprint/WD40 Offer
- Date: 24 May 90 12:36:46 GMT
- Organization: Synergistic Systems, Silver Spring, MD
-
-
- I got a FON card with the WD-40 offer. The first bill had a $10 "FON
- card non-recurring charge". Customer service said that's because I
- have a stand-alone account. My SECOND bill ALSO had a $10 "FON card
- non-recurring charge". [non-recurring indeed!] Customer service said
- that I'd get a $20 credit on my next bill. Let's see if my third bill
- had the $20 credit and the "free hour".
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: More on Stamford 1AESS crash
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 21:40:40 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
- From comp.risks Fri May 25 21:40:37 1990
- Date: Fri, 25 May 1990 14:37:39 PDT
- From: "Peter G. Neumann" <neumann@csl.sri.com>
- Subject: More on Stamford CT Telephone Switch Outage (RISKS-9.93)
-
- AT&T announced today that they have resolved most of the cause of last
- Thursday's 18-hour local-call switch outage. Apparently 10,000
- subscribers were being moved from the #1A ESS to the new #5 ESS.
- During the cutover there is apparently a two minute atomic-action
- interval during which nothing works. Due to a burp, call storage was
- lost altogether. They found procesor problems that have STILL not
- been diagnosed. They also found a cable that had been incorectly
- connected last summer, and that remained undetected until the crash.
- When the backup failed as well, diagnostics could not be run except by
- old-fashioned oscilloscopic probes. [Source: Brief phone conversation
- with Seth Angott of {The Advocate} in Stamford CT. Any inaccuracies are
- mine.]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Leslie Mikesell <les@chinet.chi.il.us>
- Subject: System 75 Question
- Organization: Chinet - Chicago Public Access UNIX
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 18:23:46 GMT
-
-
- Does anyone know if it is possible to make a system 75 switch do
- automatic trunk routing but *not* automatic queuing on certain calls?
- My modems don't really appreciate the effort that the switch makes to
- complete the call and ring them back long after the computer program
- that initiated the call has given up.
-
-
- Les Mikesell
- les@chinet.chi.il.us
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 10:13:04 CDT
- From: Gary Segal <segal@marble.uucp>
- Subject: Motorola's Products - Response to Chip Rosenthal
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Since I permitted Chip Rosenthal's entire article
- to be posted the other day -- including the comments on drug testing
- -- I thought it only fair to print this one response from an employee
- of Motorola. PT]
-
- -----------------------
-
- The following expresses the opinion of one employee of Motorola, and
- in no way represents the opinions or positions of Motorola INC.
-
- chip@chinacat.unicom.com (Chip Rosenthal) writes:
- [excellent description of dB, dBrn, e.t.c. deleted]
-
- >[1] Motorola Telecommunications Devices Databook. There are a whole slew
- > of dB definitions in the glossary. (However, I'll probably stop using
- > their products now that they've joined the piss-in-a-bottle mania.)
-
- As an employee of Motorola who is not terribly thrilled by the new
- mandatory drug testing (MDT) policy, I ask you not to consider this
- issue when evaluating our products.
-
- By declining to purchase our products because of a policy towards
- employees, you are atempting to involve yourself in the
- employee-management relations of Motorola. As you are not related to
- Motorola, other than as a (hopefully satisfied) customer, these
- concerns are none of your business, unless you feel that the quality
- of the products we produce is below your standards. You are now
- attempting to impose your views upon Motorola's employees, which is
- precisely the problem that we have now; our management is trying to
- force MDT on us.
-
- While I probably agree with your views on MDT, I feel that any
- problems with MDT must be worked out between the employees and
- management of Motorola. If you and others like you were to stop
- buying our products, business will slow, and some employees may lose
- their jobs. Management will most likely not correlate this downturn in
- business to reluctance from customers to buy from a company with MDT.
- However, if just one employee refuses to take the test, and is fired,
- and then sues Motorola, the message is much clearer. Or if an
- engineer delivers his or her resignation to George Fisher (CEO) with
- the reason being that he or she does not agree to MDT, again, a clear
- message is delievered. By not purchasing Motorola products, you will
- not send a clear message to our management, but instead you will close
- yourself to a large base of very useful and competitive products.
-
- If the activities of a company produce an external effect that you
- disagree with, you may have reason to not consider it's products.
- (For example, investment in S. Africa, pollution from factories, too
- much trafic on the local roads from the plant in your neighborhood).
- However, I feel that Motorola's MDT does not have an effect on you,
- because your rights and trust have not been compromised.
-
- If you feel that when any company starts a MDT program, that encourges
- other companies to do so as well, consider that by creating a MDT
- policy, Motorola has raised the chances that a test case will be
- brought, and this is really what we need to clear up the issue.
- However, any case that is brought must come from an empolyee, not a
- customer.
-
- If you want to make a stand against MDT, lobby your state and federal
- congressmen to make MDT illegal. You can make send a much clearer
- message to Motorola by having your state or the US outlaw MDT instead
- of not buying our products.
-
- The bottom line for a product purchase decision should be performance
- and cost, not the employee/management relations of the company
- producing the product. These issues are best handled by the people
- involved, and not the customers.
-
-
- Gary Segal ...!uunet!motcid!segal +1-708-632-2354
- Motorola INC., 1501 W. Shure Drive, Arlington Heights IL, 60004
-
- The opinions expressed above are those of the author, and do not consititue
- the opinions of Motorola INC.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jeff Jonas <synsys!jeffj@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: 10-NYT and 10-NJB
- Date: 24 May 90 12:36:46 GMT
- Organization: Synergistic Systems, Silver Spring, MD
-
-
- I've seen ads in the PATH trains for the "New York Connection" where
- NY-NJ calls are handled via the local telco by dialing "NJB" or "NYT"
- prefixes. Would someone please elaborate?
-
- 1) A number to call for information ...
- (my local rep didn't know what I was talking about)
-
- 2) The EXACT name of the program (so I can ask for the right thing) ...
-
- 3) Why I can't get it here in Ulster county ...
-
- 4) How the local telco got a waiver to give long distance service ...
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 25 May 90 2:31:17 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Memorial Day *Not* A Cell Phone Holiday?
-
-
- It came as a surprise to me today to find out that Ameritech Mobile
- does *not* count Memorial Day as a holiday for the purpose of off-peak
- rates. I think however that Cellular One/Chicago does observe the
- holiday for billing purposes.
-
- What about YOUR cellular service? Don't get caught hanging on the
- phone a lot all day Monday thinking you are on one rate when you are
- actually on another! Confirm with your carrier today.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #387
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa03894;
- 26 May 90 13:34 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa10451;
- 26 May 90 12:08 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa11452;
- 26 May 90 11:05 CDT
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 10:42:50 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #388
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005261042.ab08736@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sat, 26 May 90 10:42:10 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 388
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Memories: AT&T Enters Computer Business [TELECOM Moderator]
- Re: AT&T Commits Universal Card Fraud [John Higdon]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Dan Sahlin]
- Re: Joined Countries [Dan Sahlin]
- NYNEX Info-Look [Jeff Jonas]
- Again, a Small Problem [TELECOM Moderator]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 10:26:02 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Memories: AT&T Enters Computer Business
-
-
- Here was a topic of major interest in the fall of 1981, as reported in
- TELECOM Digest, during September that year.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 5 Sep 1981 14:06:36-PDT
- From: IngVAX.geoff at Berkeley
- Subject: Judge Approves AT&T Expansion
-
-
- Copyright (C) 1981, Washington Post Company, Saturday, September 5, 1981
-
- A federal judge yesterday gave American Telephone and Telegraph
- Co. permission to compete for the first time in the computer and
- data-processing business -- a ruling that could have an explosive
- impact on the future of the telecommunications industry.
-
- Handing the Communications giant a major victory in its bid to
- enter lucrative new business areas, Judge Vincent P. Biunno of the
- U.S. District Court in New Jersey ruled that AT&T could offer
- data-processing because it is a communications service.
-
- Under a consent decree AT&T signed with the government 25 years
- ago, the company has been barred from offering any noncommunications
- service. Until yesterday's ruling, that meant AT&T could not offer
- computer services.
-
- "It seems to the court beyond dispute that AT&T ... will be
- engaging in the business of furnishing communications services and
- facilities" by providing data-processing services, Biunno wrote. The
- ruling was handed down from the New Jersey court because that was here
- the original 1956 consent decree was filed.
-
- The decision means that beginning as early as March 1, AT&T will
- be able to become a direct competitor with International Business
- Machines Corp. and other major computer companies.
-
- What's more, the Bell System will be able to offer a wide variety
- of telephone equipment and services, ranging from the black
- rotary-dial phone to highly sophisticated computer services, without
- any of the government pricing restraints it now must follow.
-
- The judge's decision, however, by no means puts to rest the
- current congressional debate over AT&T's future structure and its role
- in the telecommunications industry. Congress is considering
- legislation to allow AT&T to offer data communications services,
- although it would bar the communications giant from offering
- electronic newspapers and up-to-the minute advertising. Debate on the
- issue is expected to continue shortly after Congress returns from its
- August recess.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Friday, 11 Sep 1981 16:04-PDT
- To: unix-wizards at SRI-UNIX
- Cc: mike at RAND-UNIX
- Subject: New computer company?
- From: mike at RAND-UNIX
-
- The following rumor was news to me. I have no way of knowing if there
- is any truth to it but my source is well connected with the computer
- industry.
-
- He claims that the Bell System computer subsidiary, whatever it will
- be called, will announce a computer system within six months. The
- computer looks like "a cross between a vax and a MAC 32". (The MAC 32
- was an array processor, I understand). Speed is said to be about 70%
- faster than a vax. It runs Unix. It has 512 32-bit registers.
-
- No information about what it will cost, when it will be announced,
- what sort of bus, etc. Supposedly it will be used in the ESS in place
- of the PDP 11.
-
- Does anyone care to refute or elaborate upon this rumor?
-
- Michael Wahrman
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 14 September 1981 09:22-EDT
- From: Andrew Tannenbaum <TRB at MIT-MC>
- Subject: New Bell System Computer
- cc: "mike@rand-unix, unix-wizards" at SRI-UNIX
-
- Dear, dear. The Bell System is very touchy about its employees
- divulging proprietary information about its products. You can't get
- fired from Bell Labs for being incompetent, just for screwing your
- secretary or smoking dope or drinking beer in your office, or
- divulging proprietary information.
-
- Sooner or later, the Bell System will be able to release its computers
- for sale. Sooner will be in more than six months though, you can rest
- assured. The wheels of justice turn S-L-O-W-L-Y.
-
- If some Bell System drone reports on proprietary products he does so
- at personal risk (possibly great). I can say that the MAC32 is NOT an
- array processor, and that Bell Labs is working on processors to use in
- their switching systems, even ones that run UNIX (our
- telecommunications support operating system). Have fun generating
- rumors, just don't attach your names to them. And do try to make them
- somewhat accurate. Should the Bell System just start offering its
- computers for sale (without clearing up small legal details), it would
- be sued several times. When the Bell System decides let you know
- about its computers (as soon as the government lets us sell them to
- you), we'll let you know.
-
- Andy Tannenbaum
- Bell Labs Whippany, NJ
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 12 Sep 1981 02:51:28-PDT
- From: purdue!cak at Berkeley
- Subject: the Bell Computer
-
-
- I suspect that the computer that Bell will announce as their first
- product is the 3B<simplex>. As far as I have heard, the 3B is a
- machine that was patterned somewhat after the VAX, but with high
- reliability for ESS applications in mind. It can run either in a
- simplex/single processor mode, which is probably what will be sold, or
- in a duplex/dual processor mode, each processor watching the other
- (like Tandem NONSTOP systems), for ESS applications. They hope for
- something like 1 day in 40 years downtime. It does run unix, I talk to
- people in the Labs who use it every day.
-
- Chris Kent (purdue!cak)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 14 Sep 1981 13:36:46-PDT
- From: menlo70!hao!cires!harkins at Berkeley
- re: Mike Wahr's query about the "bell machine"
-
-
- I have not seen anything announced, BUT... about 3 months ago there
- was an ad in Computerworld I think that was asking for marketing types
- for a "new line of mini and micro computers" ergo, the rumor nearly
- has to be true.
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 12 Sep 1981 03:30:47-PDT
- From: CSVAX.dmr at Berkeley
- Subject: Bell Computer Company
-
-
- I can't confirm or deny the rumors reported by Mike@Rand-Unix relating
- to the purported Bell System computer company, but his informant
- doesn't have good gen on the potential hardware.
-
- There are two processors. One (currently called the 3B-20) comes in
- two forms: simplex and duplex. Both are built of commercial MSI. The
- simplex is a conventional midicomputer in packaging and the like. The
- duplex runs on 48 volts, looks like an ESS machine, and has two
- mutually-checking processors. It will be used as the processor for #5
- ESS. It runs DMERT, a real-time kernel (successor to MERT, see the
- Unix BSTJ issue). A version of Unix is one of the supervisors that
- can run under DMERT.
-
- The simplex, on the other hand, is being pushed reasonably hard
- internally (inside BTL) as an alternative to the Vax both for
- conventional computing and especially for OSSs ("operational support
- systems", machines for trouble reporting, record-keeping, and the
- like). It runs a version of Unix that is a straightforward port of the
- internally supported system.
-
- Then, there is the 3B-5. This is based on an internally developed LSI
- processor chip lately called the BELLMAC(tm)-32, previously called the
- MAC-32. It does not exist as a "system" yet, but there are working
- chips. Although its existence has been announced, I suspect most of
- the details about design rules and the like are still proprietary--
- fortunately I don't remember them. It is, however, quite large in
- area. It gave rise to the joke that whereas the early, non-working
- LSI chips from most projects are made into souvenir tie tacks, the
- MAC-32 was being turned into belt buckles.
-
- The two processors are "assembly-language compatible" in that there is
- an assembler for their common machine language, which is called IS-25.
- (IS- instruction set; 25- the old number of the organization that
- developed it. A year ago all organizations in BTL were renumbered.)
- The compatibility extends to the instructions and address modes,
- though there can be differences in bit encoding, and some of the odder
- instructions aren't in the MAC-32.
-
- IS-25 is very strongly influenced by the Vax. The instructions and
- address modes are, in fact, nearly identical, though some of the
- especially recondite Vaxisms were dropped. I don't know how many
- registers there are internally, but the programmer sees 16 (32 bits
- each). Neither machine has anything to do with array processing.
-
- Dennis Ritchie
-
- ----------------------------
-
- I thought Digest readers today would enjoy seeing what the Digest
- readers in the fall of 1981 were discussing in this forum each day.
- And of course, soon thereafter the "Bell System Computers" did come
- around, in a big way.
-
- Happy holiday!
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: AT&T Commits Universal Card Fraud
- Date: 24 May 90 21:59:49 PDT (Thu)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- On May 24 at 20:18, TELECOM Moderator writes:
-
- > I doubt they simply went through phone books looking for names
- > of people they could 'defraud'. PT]
-
- Oh, I don't know about that. Back when I was much younger (and
- sillier), I used to sit down with the various trade magazines and fill
- out all the business reply cards requesting info on everything from
- equipment to trade schools. The only thing was: the name and address
- that went on each card was that of someone I had a current grudge
- against.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dan Sahlin <dan@sics.se>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Organization: SICS, Swedish Inst. of Computer Science
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 14:18:22 GMT
-
-
- In Stockholm I just found out that it now is possible to dial the local
- area code even for a local call. They must have changed that fairly
- recently. Last week when I was in Dalecarlia (in the countryside) I could
- not dial the local area code. I do hope they will make it possible there
- too, as Sweden has about 200 different area codes, and if you are
- travelling around it is almost impossible to know in which area code you
- are.
-
- Being successful on using the local area code, I tried to use the
- county code too. It worked! I do hope I'm charged as a local call
- anyway. Are there more places in the world where you may make a local
- call using the country number?
-
- We are getting closer and closer to the ultimate goal: The number you
- dial only depends on the phone you are dialing to, and not on the
- phone you are dialing from. Unfortunately Sweden uses "009" as the
- international prefix, but I understand that it will be changed into
- "00" within about five years.
-
- All Stockholm numbers (08 area) starting with 4 or 5 seem to be
- possible to dial with an additional leading 6. So my home number may
- now alternatively be dialled as "430120" or as "00946-86430120"!
-
-
- /Dan Sahlin email: dan@sics.se
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dan Sahlin <dan@sics.se>
- Subject: Re: Joined Countries
- Organization: SICS, Swedish Inst. of Computer Science
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 14:44:11 GMT
-
-
- moscom!de@cs.rochester.edu (Dave Esan) writes:
-
- >Does anyone know the intentions of the soon to be united Germanys in
- >regard to dialling patterns to what is presently East Germany (DDR),
- >and which will soon be part of a single Germany?
-
- I do not know what decisions that have been taken, but Western Germany
- has always had area codes reserved for Eastern Germany, so a
- unification here would be very simple.
-
- If the country code of Eastern Germany (37) is released, it could be
- reused for the "new" Baltic states. As we are running out of country
- codes in Europe, the code could best be used for producing ten country
- numbers: 370, 371, etc.
-
- Today I read in the morning paper about plans for Estonia to use the
- Swedish telecommunication satellite Tele-X. I do hope that this will
- make it possible to dial Tallin directly. I can dial directly almost
- anywhere in the world, but I can't dial directly to the Baltic states,
- which are neighbors to Sweden.
-
-
- /Dan Sahlin email: dan@sics.se
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jeff Jonas <synsys!jeffj@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: NYNEX Info-Look
- Date: 24 May 90 12:36:46 GMT
- Organization: Synergistic Systems, Silver Spring, MD
-
-
- NYNEX has an information gateway service. It's essentially a
- dataswitch. There are numbers in area codes 212, 718, 516 and 914.
- It's made very clear that the providers are NOT associated with NYNEX,
- that NYNEX only provides the access and the dataswitch help menus
- (which include a directory of services).
-
- 1) Has this been tried elsewhere? (I recall some slight mention of
- other failures of similar programs).
-
- 2) The directions state: "If you have a party line, your connection
- can be interrupted by another party's incoming or outgoing calls". I
- thought that modems were forbidden on party lines.
-
- 3) Why would someone have a group with this as opposed to say,
- Compuserve or Genie? Its only advantages could be keeping things
- regional (NY only) or low cost.
-
- You login with your New York Telephone calling card number. It shows
- up on your phone bill under the "Data services" heading. It's like
- 900 numbers for your computer. Each service charges by the minute,
- and shows up on your phone bill.
-
- 800-338-2720 is the customer service number.
-
- Free software is provided (for Mac or PCs). It emulates a vt100, and
- handles videotext (minitel and Alex). It's configurable much like
- Procomm (modem initialization, prefix, suffix, wait charcter, ...) so
- it should work with non Hayes compatible modems (quite unlike the
- Prodigy software).
-
- I tried it a few times, but I prefer USENET for now. I don't need
- computer chat lines, and there are NO technical forums.
-
- Phone switches used to be wired, now they're wierd. :)
-
-
- Jeffrey Jonas
- jeffj@synsys.UUCP
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 7:38:10 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Again, a Small Problem
-
-
- Once again, there was a small loss from the inbound queue, early
- Saturday morning. Two messages, including one on MCI in Area 512, were
- dumped unprocessed. The submitters who received a receipt from me
- dated in the wee hours of Saturday morning (like prior to about 7 AM,
- 5/26/90) should resubmit their article if it is not seen in this
- issue. I am reviewing this problem, which seems to be sporadic.
-
-
- PT
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #388
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa02204;
- 27 May 90 0:58 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa02217;
- 26 May 90 23:14 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa20838;
- 26 May 90 22:09 CDT
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 21:46:20 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #389
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005262146.ab23040@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sat, 26 May 90 21:45:20 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 389
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Interesting Police Technology [Isaac Rabinovitch]
- Re: Data Access Lines [Tom Gray]
- Re: Customized Telephone Number [Patricia O'connor]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Daniel Jacobson]
- Re: Sprint/WD40 Offer [Carol Springs]
- Re: FCC REN's [David Tamkin]
- Jargon Overload! (Not a Flame!) [Isaac Rabinovitch]
- A Request For Technical Info on Telecom [Mary J. Leugers]
- Correction: City Code (Minitel Access, London) [Carl Moore]
- Re: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons [Stuart Lynne]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Isaac Rabinovitch <claris!netcom!ergo@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: Interesting Police Technology
- Date: 26 May 90 16:29:09 GMT
- Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 249-0290}
-
-
- claris!netcom!onymouse@ames.arc.nasa.gov (John Debert) writes:
- (about computer terminals in police cars)
-
- >I have heard the transmissions to and from these units and estimate
- >the rate at about 1200baud. It shouldn't be too hard for someone with
- >perhaps a TNC to connect their scanner to a terminal and read the
- >traffic.
-
- True. But it ought to be possible to encrypt transmissions, if they
- haven't already done so. I don't know if it's actually possible to
- provide an unbreakable encryption method (this was claimed at one
- time; I haven't followed the issue closely but I understand there are
- doubts) but at least it can put evesdropping out of the reach of the
- less resourceful villains.
-
- For that matter, they could do the same thing with voice channels, but
- it's a whole lot easier to do this with the relatively small number of
- bits in a data channel.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Tom Gray <mitel!spock!grayt@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Date: 26 May 90 15:34:12 GMT
- Reply-To: Tom Gray <mitel!healey!grayt@uunet.uu.net>
- Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.
-
-
- In article <8293@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com> writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 387, Message 3 of 12
-
- >Chip Rosenthal <chip@chinacat.unicom.com> writes:
-
- >> dBm is commonly used to specify a level referenced to a "digital
- ^^^^^^^
- >> milliwatt" signal. This is a 1004Hz sine wave of 1mW power into
- >> 600ohms.
-
- >What was it before digital technology? I've always heard it referred
- >to as simply the "milliwatt". Also, to be technically pure, dBm can be
- >a reference to one milliwatt into any impedance, as long as it's a
- >milliwatt. The 600 ohms comes into play because everyone knows that
- >that when you measure 0.775 volts on across 600 ohms, you have a
- >milliwatt. If you measure 0.949 volts across 900 ohms, you still have
- >a milliwatt. And it is still 0 dBm.
-
- The digital milliwatt is defined in the CCITT standards. It is a
- sequence of eight PCM codes which when repeated in sequence produce a
- 1KHz tone. The digital miiliwatt is a means of defining the
- relationship between the analog and digital domains. Note that digital
- milliwatt or the digital test sequence produces a 1Khz tone when
- decoded not 1004Hz.
-
- 1004Hz digital tones are commonly used since it requires 2000 PCM
- samples to produce a single cycle of the tone. This produces a more
- exhaustive test of the decoders of PCM then the eight samples: of the
- strictly deefined 1Khz DTS.
-
- Because of roundoff error in the PCM sequences for the tones the 1Khz
- DTS will produce a level that is approximately .1db different than the
- 1004Hz tone. Thus for accurate level allignment of a PCM decoder the
- strict 1KHz DTS must be used. Thus the 1004Hz sequences are suitable
- for production or field testing of a PCM circuit but truly accurate
- allignments must use the DTS.
-
- I agree with Mr. Higdon in that dbm refers to one milliwatt in any
- impedance at any frequency. Indeed, even fibre optic transmitters and
- receivers are specified in dbm and their operating frequencies are
- rather higher than 1Khz.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Patricia O'connor <farcomp!Patricia.O'connor@apple.com>
- Subject: Re: Customized Telephone Number
- Date: 24 May 90 07:20:44 GMT
- Organization: FidoNet node 1:161/555 - MacCircles, Pleasanton CA
-
-
- Like you, I've had success getting 'easy to remember' numbers. When I
- call for new service, I simply ask for one. In both Mountain Bell and
- Pacific Bell territory, they offered a selection to choose from. My
- Tucson number was 885-8850.
-
-
- PatiO
-
- Patricia O'connor - via FidoNet node 1:125/777
- UUCP: ...!sun!hoptoad!fidogate!161!555!Patricia.O'connor
- INTERNET: Patricia.O'connor@f555.n161.z1.FIDONET.ORG
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 18:41:37 CDT
- From: Daniel Jacobson <danj1@ihlpa.att.com>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Organization: AT&T-BL, Naperville IL, USA
-
-
- msb@sq.com (Mark Brader) writes:
-
- :If I dial 1-416-759-0000, it is rejected because that is not the way
- :to dial the local number 759-0000, and *therefore I must have
- :misdialed*. Perhaps I really wanted 1-415-759-0000, say; San
- :Francisco instead of Toronto. So why bother the poor wretch who has
- :that number in Toronto?
-
- Hmmm, it is protecting you from misdialing one out of the 150+ North
- American areacodes ... but you might have dialed 412, 413, 414, etc.
- when intending for 415. So there's only one poor wretch out of 150
- that will be spared being woken up by fumble-fingers via this
- "feature".
-
-
- Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM +1-708-979-6364
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Carol Springs <carols@world.std.com>
- Subject: Re: Sprint/WD40 Offer
- Organization: The World
- Date: Sun, 27 May 90 00:20:36 GMT
-
-
- Jeff Jonas writes:
-
- >I got a FON card with the WD-40 offer. The first bill had a $10 "FON
- >card non-recurring charge". Customer service said that's because I
- >have a stand-alone account.
-
- Now this is fascinating, because when I gave Sprint my work number, I
- was never asked whether I had an account with US Sprint already. The
- name in Sprint's records for my home account is "C. Springs." "Carol
- Springs" works in a different city from the one in which C. Springs
- lives. In short, Sprint could make a good guess that I was the same
- person (I may well be the only Springs in area code 617), but if
- that's what it was using as its criterion for adding the surcharge it
- seems a little slimy. (Almost as slimy as my ordering the unneeded
- card in the first place.)
-
- I would think that the $10 (now $20) surcharge in my case is more
- likely to have been due to my having given a business phone
- number--Sprint certainly knows it's a business number, since I've been
- getting the business version of its inserts on that account. But I
- think Patrick gave his work number to Sprint also and never got the
- surcharge.
-
- As I said, never again.
-
-
- Carol Springs carols@world.std.com
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Actually, I gave Sprint the number of my voicemail
- box, which is a DID trunk at Central Telephone Company. I have not yet
- heard if it has been converted to Sprint one-plus yet. :) And, no, I
- did not get a one-time charge, or a two-time charge either, for that
- matter. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Tamkin <dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN's
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 17:20:36 CDT
-
-
- In volume 10, issue 386, Tad Cook and Julian Macassey both replied to
- my earlier questions about ringer equivalency numbers. Below, "DT>"
- prefaces what I asked in an earlier submission. My current comments
- are flush left.
-
- DT> 1. What does the B or A after an REN mean?
-
- TC> A B type ringer must respond to 16 to 68 Hz ringing frequency, and
- TC> an A ringer only responds to 20 or 30 Hz, +/- 3 Hz.
-
- Frequency of what, if I may ask? That question has been slid on past
- throughout this discussion under the assumption that everyone must
- already know. It certainly isn't the pitch of the ringer's sound, and
- it isn't the frequency at which the AC is alternated...or is it?
-
- DT> 2. If the ringer on a telephone can be turned off, does it no longer
- DT> count in figuring the total REN load on a line?
-
- TC> A phone with the ringer turned off SHOULD have no REN load on the
- TC> line, but I could imagine an electronic ringer that still has its
- TC> detector across the line, but the sound source is off.
-
- So the REN has nothing to do with powering the ringer so much as with
- recognizing *whether* to sound the ringer?
-
- DT> 3. Two of my modems *do* have REN's, though neither has any sort of
- DT> bell or gong. They check in at "0.4 1.2B" and "0.5A 1.6B"
- DT> respectively. My other modem has a speaker and thus does make a noise
- DT> (but the speaker is powered by the electric utility, not the telco);
- DT> it has an FCC ID but no REN on it at all.
-
- TC> What's the question?
-
- Good point; I realized that myself after rereading my own words in the
- Digest. Somebody had said that yes, there could be 0 REN's: look at a
- modem or an answering machine for examples. So I looked at my modem
- and at my answering machine (which reads 0.4 B) and said, gee, hey,
- these numbers are not zero.
-
- Those were Cook; these are Macassey:
-
- DT> 1. What does the B or A after an REN mean?
-
- JM> I think I covered this in an earlier posting, but then I could have
- JM> glossed over it.
-
- Maybe you did, but when you and the other techie types in this Digest
- write at each other's level, my eyes (and the eyes of other readers)
- glaze over and roll backwards. You could put "the surf was great off
- Los Angeles today" into the middle and most of us wouldn't be able to
- read through the technical stuff to find that. Yes, this digest-cum-
- noozgroop is the place to discuss the technical end as well as the
- user's end, but please understand that a non-techie reader like me can
- miss something written deep inside an incomprehensible submission
- about the specifics of the guts of wires and switches.
-
- If it's any consolation, if you did cover that in another posting, you
- probably explained it in a way I couldn't have understood if I had
- read it, so I'd have had to ask again regardless.
-
- JM> See an earlier posting of mine where I waffle about this.
-
- I can't read your crackers, let alone your waffles. If you ever post
- a brioche, I won't even try.
-
- DT> 2. If the ringer on a telephone can be turned off, does it no longer
- DT> count in figuring the total REN load on a line?
-
- JM> [Essentially, Macassey's reply was that if you shut off the ringer
- JM> switch on the outside of the telephone, no, but if you open the
- JM> phone up and disconnect the wiring to the entire ringing circuit
- JM> (not just the part that makes the noise), yes. At least I guess
- JM> that's what he was trying to say.]
-
- All I know is this: if the phones whose ringers I have shut off do
- count toward the allowed REN total, it beats the heck out of me how
- the remaining ones still ring loud enough to wake me up when my mother
- decides to play alarm clock. ("This is your mother, David," she
- records on my answering machine as if I couldn't recognize her voice.
- "I know it's early, but" she's decided to phone me anyway, almost
- always about something that could have gone unsaid altogether.)
-
- DT> 3. [See quote of my #3 above if you want to reread it.]
-
- JM> ... In truth, all modems I have seen are type B ringers. To prove
- JM> this, feed say 60V at 60 Hz (yes power via a regular transformer)
- JM> to a modem; betya it picks up if in answer mode.
-
- May those among the readership who do not own the equipment to feed
- voltage X at frequency Y into the inwards of appliance Z nor the tools
- and know-how to fix the damage afterward be excused from this project,
- please? "Betya" you didn't know there were any of us here.
-
- JM> I wrote extensively about all this ringer stuff years ago in Popular
- JM> Communications mag, but I suppose it wasn't all that popular then.
- JM> Plus of course the editors used to bugger and censor my text so some
- JM> of the more esoteric stuff was jumbled and meaningless by the time it
- JM> reached the public and vulgar gaze.
-
- The editors didn't have to do that. The esoteric stuff is already
- meaningless to the public gaze without their help. All you experts,
- please be tolerant if we ask for a re-explanation of something in more
- common terms or if we don't realize that a question is equivalent to
- one posed previously in thick jargon.
-
-
- David Tamkin Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 708 518 6769 312 693 0591
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN CIS: 73720,1570 dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Isaac Rabinovitch <claris!netcom!ergo@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Jargon Overload! (Not a Flame!)
- Date: 26 May 90 16:40:58 GMT
- Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 249-0290}
-
-
- john@bovine.ati.com (John Higdon) writes:
-
- >"VAXB::DBURKE" <dburke%vaxb.decnet@nusc-npt.navy.mil> writes:
-
- >This is one of the things (along with Centrex, pagers, answering
- >services, and other heavy DID customers) that is responsible for the
- >depletion of our NPAs. CLASS could eliminate much of the waste. For
- >instance, answering services would see which customer was forwarding
- >to their *one* number and answer accordingly. No DID required.
-
- ARRRGH!
-
- Sorry. I'm not criticising Mr. Burke. His language is part of his
- expertise, after all. But my lack of experience in the telecom world
- leaves me without the vocabulary to follow many of the interesting and
- important discussions in this conference. I have *no* idea what a
- DID, an NPA or a CLASS is (though I suspect they are vorpal and
- puissant entities). Could somebody post a lexicon for the benefit of
- folks like me?
-
- Please note that I'm *not* criticizing anybody's writing style.
-
- [Moderator's Note: It would seem to me David Tamkin and yourself have
- similar complaints, and the answer for both of you may be to obtain
- copies of the glossary files in the Telecom Archives. Look for the
- file entitled 'phrack.glossary'. The Telecom Archives is FTP
- accessible at lcs.mit.edu, using anonymous login. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 1990 16:13:09 EDT
- From: "Mary J. Leugers" <leugers@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu>
- Subject: A Request For Technical Info on Telecom
-
-
- I am in the process of organizing a reading list for an individualized
- studies class entitled 'Intro to the Technology of Telecom' and, as I
- am a novice myself, I was wondering if I could get some help from some
- of you.
-
- The class is aimed at graduate students in communications who have no
- experience in the engineering realm. It is expected that the class will
- get an introduction to the physical realm of telecom along with the
- present standards and the implications for policy. The more info I
- have, the better, so I would appreciate if you would take a minute to
- pass along some readings you think might be useful.
-
- Thanks,
-
- Center for Advanced Study in Telecommunications
-
- Mary Leugers 1971 Neil Avenue
- Graduate Research Associate 210 Baker Systems
- Columbus, OH 43210-1271
- E-mail: Phone: (614) 292-8444
- leugers@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu Fax: (614) 292-7852
- Home: (614) 421-1552
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 13:36:48 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Correction: City Code (Minitel Access, London)
-
-
- I had edited the following to reflect a note in Telecom about the move
- of these Minitel access numbers from the old 01 area in London. Now,
- I find 437 and 439 listed in 071 in lists I have.
-
- United Kingdom -------------------
- +++ London 081-437-4393
- +++ London 081-439-4055
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: sl@van-bc.UUCP (Stuart Lynne)
- Subject: Re: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons
- Date: 26 May 90 19:58:38 GMT
- Reply-To: sl@van-bc.UUCP (Stuart Lynne)
- Organization: Wimsey Associates
-
-
- In article <8194@accuvax.nwu.edu> David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.
- miami.edu> writes:
-
- }ojo: Why did they have to change the 911 emergency phone number in
- }<neighboring state>?
-
- }Because the <natives> couldn't find the eleven on their phones.
-
- So they changed it to 9-1-1.
-
- I hope we don't have an emergencies here, my phone doesn't have a "-" key!
-
-
- Stuart.Lynne@wimsey.bc.ca ubc-cs!van-bc!sl
- 604-937-7532 (voice) 604-939-4768 (fax)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #389
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa28565;
- 27 May 90 12:42 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa18545;
- 27 May 90 11:19 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa10484;
- 27 May 90 10:15 CDT
- Date: Sun, 27 May 90 10:05:26 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #390
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005271005.ab11115@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Sun, 27 May 90 10:05:06 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 390
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Memories: A Look at 1982 [TELECOM Moderator]
- #0 ESS [David Lesher]
- Re: Censorship? (was Re: Telephones, Technology and Media) [Mitch Wagner]
- Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD LD Discount [Nigel Allen]
- Re: Customized Telephone Numbers [David Lesher]
- Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter" [Henry Mensch]
- Bibliography: Sysop Liability [Mike Riddle]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 22:35:03 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Memories: A Look at 1982
-
-
- As the year 1982, and volume 2 of TELECOM Digest got underway, two
- items of interest over the New Year's holiday were the annoucement of
- AT&T's divestiture, and the coming of Picturephone in a big way.
-
- Here are some comments from Volume 2, Issues 1 and 2.
-
- Date: 29 Dec 81 22:23:16-EDT (Tue)
- From: Randall Gellens <gellens.CC@UDel>
- Subject: AT&T Videophone Links
- Via: UDel-CC; 29 Dec 81 22:25-EST
-
- {San Francisco Chronicle}, Wed., December 23, 1981:
-
- Washington:
-
- The American Telephone and Telegraph Co. yesterday proposed offering a
- two-way video teleconference service beginning in 1982...AT&T said the
- new, full-color Picturphone Meeting Service will be available in 16
- cities in 1982 and a total of 42 cities by the end of 1983....
-
- If the FCC approves the service, it will first be offered between New
- York City and Washington, D.C., beginning next March.
-
- The service would be made available to customers in two ways: through
- a public room built by AT&T in each of the 42 cities, or through
- private rooms on customer premises. It would be provided over a
- digital network of satellite and Earth facilities.
-
- Any room, public or private, would be able to communicate with any
- other room on the video network....
-
- Typical charges for a customer using two public rooms to conduct a
- one-hour meeting between New York and Washington would be $1340. A
- similar meeting between New York and Los Angles would cost $2380.
-
- In the case of private rooms, usage charges would be lower: $600 for a
- one-hour New York-Washington session and $1640 for the New York-Los
- Angles session.
-
- Customers installing private rooms would pay a one-time installation
- charge of $124,800, as well as monthly equipment rental and access
- fees of $13,420. There would also be a monthly charge of $250 per
- mile to connect each room to Bell System facilities.
-
- Customers would have the option of providing equipment themselves, the
- company said.
-
- United Press
-
- Date: 9 January 1982 13:15-PST
- From: Jonathan Alan Solomon <JSol at Rutgers>
- Subject: AT&T Monopoly on local phone service disbanded
-
- [The first paragraph of this article had to be ad-lib'd by yours truly
- since that part of the Associated Press article was unreadable --JSol]
-
- The big anti-trust suit over AT&T is over. AT&T has agreed to split
- off the local phone companies into their own separate entities, which
- will be regulated. The subsidiaries remaining (Bell Labs, Western
- Electric, and Long Lines) will be unregulated and will be permitted to
- compete in the free market (Meaning they can sell telephones to the
- General Public). The following phone companies must be divested by the
- American Telephone Company within 18 months, under terms of the
- agreement reached yesterday:
-
- -The New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
- -The New York Telephone Co.
- -The New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.
- -The Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania.
- -The Diamond State Telephone Co.
- -The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., serving Washington, D.C.
- -The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland.
- -The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia.
- -The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of West Virginia.
- -The Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
- -The South Central Bell Telephone Co.
- -The Ohio Bell Telephone Co.
- -The Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
- -The Indiana Bell Telephone Co. Inc.
- -The Wisconsin Telephone Co.
- -The Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
- -The Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
- -The Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
- -The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
- -The Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.
- -The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
- -The Bell Telephone Co. of Nevada.
-
- The Bell Telephone Co. of Nevada is actually a wholly-owned
- subsidiary of the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., rather than
- directly owned by AT&T.
-
- Company officials said Friday the consent decree does not yet
- address the question of whether AT&T will be required to divest itself
- of its minority interests in two other local operating companies: The
- Southern New England Telephone Co. and Cincinnati Bell Inc.
-
- Date: 4 Jan 1982 10:40:27-PST
- From: cbosgd!mark at Berkeley
- Subject: Picturephone Service
-
- Funny, but our TV news stations just made the announcement a couple
- weeks ago that Ohio Bell is NOW OFFERING this picturephone meeting
- service in Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinatti, and I got the
- impression that it's been available in some of the more major cities
- already. I certainly did not get the impression that it was pending
- FCC approval.
-
- By the way, I was one of the guinea pigs when BTL was developing this.
- It was pretty neat! The only weird thing is that there is a delay of
- about .75 seconds between when you say/do something and when the guy
- at the other end hears/sees it, due to satelite delays and processing.
- This means it will be 1.5 seconds between the time you do something
- and when you see the response. Since you are otherwise under the
- impression that you are meeting face to face with the person, it feels
- a little weird not to get instant response to a facial inflection or
- interruption.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: #0 ESS
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 16:06:50 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
- In the early 60's a friend got transferred to N.J to help in ESS
- development work. I remember him mentioning one, ahem, minor problem
- that kept recurring.
-
- Seems the switch would be all up and happy, but when REALLY busy, for
- some reason it would 'forget' about some calls already in progress.
- They were still talking, but when the switch went to use the
- ?connector/level or whateever they called it? and found it "occupied"
- it got upset.
-
- The only way to pacify it was to let it restart. In other words, knock
- down EVERY call in the switch and start at zero.
-
- Glad they fixed THAT one before installation. Can you imagine the mess
- of rebooting the biggest tandem switch in NYC or Chicago at ten AM? On
- a regular basis?
-
-
- A host is a host from coast to coast.....wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu
- & no one will talk to a host that's close............(305) 255-RTFM
- Unless the host (that isn't close)......................pob 570-335
- is busy, hung or dead....................................33257-0335
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Mitch Wagner <utoday!wagner@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Censorship? (was Re: Telephones, Technology and Media
- Date: 26 May 90 18:19:48 GMT
- Reply-To: wagner@utoday.UUCP (Mitch Wagner)
- Organization: UNIX Today!, Manhasset, NY
-
-
- In article <8166@accuvax.nwu.edu> jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (j. eric
- townsend) writes:
-
- #In article <8120@accuvax.nwu.edu> somebody wrote:
-
- #>In article <8066@accuvax.nwu.edu> jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (j. eric
- #>townsend) writes:
- #>>If you are asked to give an interview on say, PBX security, offer
- #>>to review the reporter's story before they submit it.
-
- #>In connection with the times I sat for interviews regarding the
- #>Internet Worm, I always offered just such a service. Almost
- #>uniformly, the response was a semi-hostile glare followed by "our
- #>editors have a policy of not allowing our stories to be censored."
-
- #1. Explain to them that you don't want to censor the story, but make
- #sure the facts are correct.
-
- #2. Call the reporter's editor, and explain the situation to them.
- #Something like: "It's not the tone or point of view I'm worried about;
- #it's the facts regarding the technology. I want to insure that you
- #represent the technology correctly in your story."
-
- #Any editor who calls this "story censorship" should probably be fired...
-
- Just $.02 here from someone who spent almost four years working for
- daily newspapers, as a reporter:
-
- The reason for the traditional prohibition against allowing sources to
- read stories in advance is twofold. One is to avoid giving an unfair
- advantage to the proponents of one point of view over the proponents
- of another point of view.
-
- (I'm anticipating here that someone is going to reply, "But, the time
- I asked to read an article, I wasn't espousing any particular point of
- view. I was just trying to get the facts out!"
-
- (But I'm sure there was someone who would disagree with every word you
- said in the article, who would have said the same exact thing to
- the reporter.)
-
- The second reason is practicality. It takes an awful long time for a
- layman to review an article, and more than half the time, said layman
- will come back with the most incredibly nitpicky changes, which require
- time-consuming fights/diplomatic meetings to convince said layman that
- the changes just weren't worth it.
-
- This is not to excuse newspapers for errors of fact; just to explain
- some of the reasons why review-by-sources isn't allowed.
-
- Just a point of view.
-
-
- Mitch wagner@utoday.UUCP
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD Long Distance Discount
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 8:50:17 EDT
- From: ndallen <contact!ndallen@uunet.uu.net>
- From: Nigel Allen <contact!ndallen@uunet.uu.net>
-
-
- [speculation that AT&T may eliminate the 50% discount on TDD calls]
-
- The rationale for the discount, IMHO, is not that TDD users are
- economically disadvantaged. It's that TDD calls take longer than
- corresponding voice calls, so the discount means that a TDD
- conversation that transmits as much information as a voice call that
- takes half as long will be changed the same amount.
-
- Bell Canada offers a 50% discount on long distance to registered TDD
- users, and as far as I know, has no plans to eliminate the discount.
- Of course, it would require CRTC approval to do so.
-
-
- Nigel Allen
- 52 Manchester Avenue voice telephone (416) 535-8916
- Toronto, Ontario M6G 1V3 fax (416) 978-7552
- Canada
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
- Subject: Re: Customized Telephone Numbers
- Date: Sun, 27 May 90 9:55:44 EDT
- Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
-
-
- Alas, this seems to be another area where the LEC's get starry-eyed
- and see:
- Revenue Source!
- Revenue Source!
-
- It used to be that you had to be 'somebody' to get one. Me? Well, I
- asked my friends at test board. They gave me the number for
- "assigning", the folks who kept track. They (assuming I was the
- business office, since no one else would have the number to call them)
- told me to "Tell the sub{scriber} that it's a business nopay
- disconnect" meaning that I might lost of calls from bill collectors
- and such. Then you called the rep and got the same song and dance each
- time: "The Telephone Company assigns all numbers, but {special favor
- implied} if it is available, I will see if you can have it"
-
- Now, SBT wants a fee for trying ($5.00 I think) up to 6 numbers. They
- tell you to try all the ones you like, and choose "not in service"
- ones. The problem with THAT is the large # of reserved assignments,
- such as DID blocks, and Centrucks ;-}. I went through about 150
- combinations before I got the present one. Unassigned, but reserved
- was a real gem xxUNIXV. Oh well, this is a BSD machine, anyhow.
- NET-NEWS didn't fit my CO assignment.
-
- C+P is a lower life form, IMHO. They not only want a flat charge, but
- something like $1.50/month too! Sorry, but I won't pay that.
-
- Moral: the only rational way to do it is get an insider to help you.
- Chances are she or he can do it for free.
-
-
- A host is a host from coast to coast.....wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu
- & no one will talk to a host that's close............(305) 255-RTFM
- Unless the host (that isn't close)......................pob 570-335
- is busy, hung or dead....................................33257-0335
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 27 May 90 02:10:45 -0400
- From: Henry Mensch <henry@garp.mit.edu>
- Organization: MIT Project Athena Network Services Evangelist
- Subject: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter"
-
-
- I received this letter in the mail today:
-
- Dear Henry Mensch:
-
- In the next two weeks, Boston Gas Company will be in your neighborhood
- to install a new meter reading system. This new system will enable us
- to read your meter accurately on a monthly basis without the necessity
- of a meter reader entering your home.
-
- A Boston Gas service representative will be at your home to install a
- new, specially-equipped gas meter. The inconvenience to you will be
- minimal, the meter change will take about twenty-five minutes and will
- be performed at no charge to you. We will then be able to read your
- meter accurately by radio signal from a computer equipped van as we
- drive down your street.
-
- Once the new meter reading system is installed, you will soon begin to
- receive your monthly bills based on actual, not estimated, readings.
- without the inconveniences associated with conventional meter reading.
-
- We are very excited about this meter reading system and believe that
- it will continue to improve our service to you. We appreciate your
- cooperation.
-
- Sincerely,
-
-
- Domenic A. Barbero, Jr.
- Manager
- Customer Activities
-
-
- (n.b. -- All capitalization in the letter is mine; the letter was
- computer-generated and printed in upper case).
-
- Now, aside from not including very many details of this new system
- (does it continuously broadcast use? If not, then how does it know to
- broadcast? how is the signal encoded? ...), one wonders what gives
- boston gas company the idea that I want them to install a radio
- transmitter in my home.
-
-
- # Henry Mensch / <henry@garp.mit.edu> / E40-379 MIT, Cambridge, MA
- # <hmensch@uk.ac.nsfnet-relay> / <henry@tts.lth.se> / <mensch@munnari.oz.au>
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 17:09:52 EDT
- From: Mike Riddle <Mike.Riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org>
- Subject: Bibliography: Sysop Liability
- Reply-to: Mike.Riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org
-
-
- I posted the following list to this newsgroup some time ago, but
- recent events cause me to repost it. (I'm sure our esteemed moderator
- will kill it if it's unnecessarily duplicative.)
-
- The following law review articles should be available at the law
- library near you, or through interlibrary loan. They all touch on
- issues related to recent inquiries about system operator liability and
- privilege occasioned by recent law enforcement activities.
-
- This is by no means an exhaustive list, but it's pretty good, and will
- give any interested party a starting point for further research.
-
- Comment, Computer Bulletin Board Operator Liability for User Misuse,
- 54 Fordham L. Rev. 439 (1985).
-
- Comment, An Electronic Soapbox: Computer Bulletin Boards and the First
- Amendment (authored by Eric C. Jensen), 39 Fed. Comm. L. J. 217
- (1987).
-
- Hernandez, ECPA and Online Computer Privacy, 41 Fed. Comm. L. J. 17
- (1989).
-
- Soma, Smith & Sprague, Legal Analysis of Electronic Bulletin Board
- Activities, 7 W. New England L. Rev. 571 (1985).
-
- While oriented toward Bulletin Board Systems, the analysis provided
- would appear to fit larger applications, such as this newsgroup. When
- reading them, remember that three were written before the ECPA was
- enacted, and that there has been little reported litigation involving
- the ECPA. In legal terms, the law is "unsettled."
-
- Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. Anyone seeking legal advice should
- contact an attorney. No warranties of any kind are offered or implied.
- (My wife doesn't pay any attention to me, and I don't mind myself very
- often, so why should you?)
-
-
- Ybbat (DRBBS) 8.9 v. 3.11 r.3
- * Origin: [1:285/27@fidonet] The Inns of Court 402/593-1192 (1:285/27.0)
-
- Through FidoNet gateway node 1:16/390
- Mike.Riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #390
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa01841;
- 28 May 90 14:54 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa29290;
- 28 May 90 13:27 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa28790;
- 28 May 90 12:22 CDT
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 11:24:59 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #391
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005281125.ab13018@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Mon, 28 May 90 11:23:50 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 391
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- ANI and CID Are NOT the Same Thing [Thomas Lapp]
- Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD LD Discount [Joel Yossi]
- Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD LD Discount [Linc Madison]
- Re: Interesting Police Technology [Brian Kantor]
- Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter" [Roy Smith]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [David Leibold]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Isaac Rabinovitch]
- Re: NYNEX's Info-Look [Henry Mensch]
- Re: Data Access Lines [Mike Riddle]
- Re: Remote Location Telephone Service [Linc Madison]
- Re: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons [Linc Madison]
- Re: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons [Craig Dickson]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 27 May 90 21:16:47 EDT
- From: Thomas Lapp <thomas%mvac23.uucp@udel.edu>
- Subject: ANI and CID Are NOT the Same Thing
-
-
- I was talking to a telephone rep. the other day about CID, and found
- out that CID and ANI are not the same thing. I had been assuming that
- they were.
-
- ANI (Automatic? Number Identification) is the telephone number
- associated with the bill on the phone you are calling from. CID
- (Caller ID) is the phone number of the station (telephone line) you
- are calling from. Note the difference: if I have it arranged so that
- all of my <n> numbers are billed to the same account, then the ANI of
- all the lines is the same. The CID, however, is unique to each line.
-
- Maybe this was pointed out before in Telecom, but if so, I missed it,
- and I apologize for bringing it up again.
-
-
- - tom
-
- internet : mvac23!thomas@udel.edu or thomas%mvac23@udel.edu
- uucp : {ucbvax,mcvax,psuvax1,uunet}!udel!mvac23!thomas
- Europe Bitnet: THOMAS1@GRATHUN1 Location: Newark, DE, USA
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: It was brought up one time, as part of, IMHO, a
- very specious argument about Caller*ID, to wit: 'Caller*ID is bad
- because business places will get our telephone numbers and we are
- likely to get unwanted telephone sales calls as a result.' It was
- pointed out that ANI, while technically a different service, provides
- the same end results when you dial an 800 number, albiet 'they' get
- your main listed number rather than the specific line you are calling
- from. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Yossi (Joel" <joel%TECHUNIX.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu>
- Subject: Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD Long Distance Discount
- Date: 27 May 90 06:13:38 GMT
- Reply-To: "Yossi (Joel" <joel%TECHUNIX.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu>
- Organization: Technion, Israel Inst. Tech., Haifa Israel
-
-
- In article <8241@accuvax.nwu.edu> mcb@presto.ig.com (Michael C. Berch) writes:
-
- >In the referenced article, CER2520@ritvax.bitnet (Curtis E. Reid) writes:
-
- >> I heard a disturbing news that AT&T may consider removing the TDD Long
- >> Distance Toll Call discounts when AT&T does its own billing. [...]
-
- >> Can any TELECOM readers comment on this? AT&T, don't consider
- >> removing TDD discounts!!
-
- >Please don't take this the wrong way, but what is the justification
- >for discounts for TDD customers? I can see doing it if the bandwidth
- >of TDD devices is so much smaller than voice that deaf people are
- >effectively paying more for less effective use of the same circuit for
- >the same amount of time as hearing people, but I have not heard that
- >argument brought up. (And in which case I think there is a good
- >argument for the discount, or at least a special TDD rate structure.)
-
- The rational is that the same phone call should cost the same to
- everyone. For the same reason that folks with old switch equipment
- aren't charged extra for the additional upkeep costs, TDD users
- shouldn't be charged extra just because they have to converse at 48
- baud.
-
- Also, at least in the past, AT&T has been a service-oriented business.
- They don't charge for wrong numbers, for busy signals, calls that were
- never completed, etc. They regularly absorb some operating costs to
- keep their services attractive and equitable.
-
-
- Joel
- (joel@techunix.technion.ac.il -or- joel@techunix.BITNET)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 03:59:37 PDT
- From: Linc Madison <rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: Alert: AT&T May Consider Removing TDD Long Distance Discount
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- Having made one TDD-to-TDD call and several TDD-relay calls, I can
- verify that even with fast typists, TDD calls have much slower
- throughput than voice. Speaking, I can about keep pace with text
- rolling across my CRT at 1200 bps and can with a little effort almost
- keep up with 2400 bps. Someone quoted TDD standards as being 45 bps;
- even if it's old TTY at 110 bps, it's still slow. My roommate who
- heard me on a relay call once asked,
- "why...........were............you.............talking..........
- .......so..........slowly.....?"
-
- (BTW, in case you're curious, I can type about 120 wpm, which is well
- into the range of professional typists, and TDD was still painfully slow.
- For a comparison, try a "talk" connection on UNIX, and then halve it.)
-
-
- Linc Madison = rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Brian Kantor <brian@ucsd.edu>
- Subject: Re: Interesting Police Technology
- Date: 27 May 90 14:44:53 GMT
- Organization: The Avant-Garde of the Now, Ltd.
-
-
- The older data terminals (such as the "MODAT") didn't send ASCII, and
- it wasn't 10-bit async frames. What was actually being sent was the
- raster image of the characters to be printed, a scanline at a time, on
- the assumption that if mobile chop (brief periods of squelch closure
- due to nulls in coverage in a moving car) or ignition noise pulses
- were to eat some of the data stream, you'd only lose a few dots and
- the human eye/mind could easily fill in the missing data, since the
- image of a character contains a LOT of redundant information (just
- consider how easily you can read a bad photocopy).
-
- Those were the days when microprocessors like the 8080 had only been
- on the market a year or so, and they cost $125 each, so there weren't
- many outside the lab.
-
- Nowadays more sophisticated error-correction systems are used,
- although I'm not up on the exact details. I'll try to find out -
- although I'm not in the two-way business anymore, lots of friends
- still are.
-
- In any case, I've done some snooping, and nothing I have here will
- decode the radio teleprinter stuff I can hear on my spy radio, which
- means that it's either encrypted and/or it's not ASCII, Baudot, AX.25,
- SITOR, nor some other common codes.
-
-
- - Brian
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
- Subject: Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter"
- Organization: Public Health Research Institute, New York City
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 14:03:03 GMT
-
-
- In <8329@accuvax.nwu.edu> henry@garp.mit.edu (Henry Mensch) writes:
-
- > We will then be able to read your meter accurately by radio signal
- > from a computer equipped van as we drive down your street.
-
- Sounds like the Cat Detector Van from the Ministry of Housing!
- Anyway, I can't help with Henry's question, but have one of my own on
- a similar subject.
-
- A few (ten?) years ago, Hackensack Water Company installed an
- automated meter reading gizmo on my parents' water meter (and a new
- meter, equipped for said gizmo). There is a cable running from the
- meter to a plastic box around 6" x 9" x 2" (about big enough to be a
- late 1970's line-powered 1200 bps modem, I guess) and some quad cable
- from there to Tip/Ring on the phone entrance block. Anybody know
- exactly how this works? Either it is programmed to place a local call
- in the middle of the night to some data-collection number, or maybe
- HWCo has permission from NJBell to run some sort of data-over-voice
- carrier on top of their wires? Anybody know for sure?
-
- What would be more interesting if there was some sort of
- standardized meter-to-recorder interface which all the various
- utilities used. Then you could design a multi-port version of the box
- described above and the water, gas, and electric meters could all plug
- into it.
-
-
- Roy Smith, Public Health Research Institute
- 455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016
- roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu -OR- {att,cmcl2,rutgers,hombre}!phri!roy
- "Arcane? Did you say arcane? It wouldn't be Unix if it wasn't arcane!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: djcl@contact.uucp (woody)
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Reply-To: djcl@contact.UUCP (David Leibold)
- Organization: Contact Public Unix BBS. Toronto, Canada.
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 01:53:22 GMT
-
-
- I found a report of someone in 416 being able to dial 416 + local
- number and getting the local number (no 1+ in front, though). This was
- after the cutover in March to allow for NXX prefixes.
-
-
- || djcl@contact.uucp // David Leibold
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Isaac Rabinovitch <claris!netcom!ergo@ames.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Date: 27 May 90 17:01:10 GMT
- Organization: NetCom- The Bay Area's Public Access Unix System {408 249-0290}
-
-
- kitty!larry@uunet.uu.net (Larry Lippman) writes:
-
- >> I feel the need to let them know about the gaping (and I mean gaping)
- >> computer and physical security holes they have, but I'm not sure about
- >> the best way to approach it (or even if I should).
-
- > I suspect your "need" is born of the guilt of trespass. In my
- >travels I have found that most people who *volunteer* information
- >about security flaws in a manner which is not part of their regular
- >job responsibilities are usually trying to hide something and I tend
- >to be suspicious of their motives.
-
- I've been holding this message in my NN directory for over a week, so
- I could summon up a semi-mature response. Here's a try.
-
- Lippman is confusing ignorance with innocence and lack of accountability
- with lack of responsibility.
-
- Our anonymous might well have been "trespassing" (though Lippman
- ignores the legal responsibility of the "offended" party in this sort
- of property rights issue). But what in Watergate's Name has that got
- to do with anything? If somebody sees your house being robbed, you
- expect them to do something about it, even if that somebody is a
- peeping tom. Attacking our "snoop" instead of dealing with the moral
- issues is an Ad Hominem argument, which is Latin for "Stick to the
- Facts, damnit."
-
- >Security issues are a *sensitive* topic, and right or wrong,
- >management does not usually appreciate unsolicited advice on this topic.
-
- And why do you suppose that is? (Socratic/rhetorical question.)
-
- > I fully agree with the Moderator. Extending to you the
- >benefit of the doubt that your motives are genuinely pristine and
- >altruistic, this is NOT YOUR PROBLEM, and YOU WILL GET NO REWARD for
- >disclosing this information to management. More likely than not,
- >should you do elect to disclose the information, your action in doing
- >so will make you a suspect for *something*.
-
- As I said in a previous posting, it's easy to get burned by a security
- problem, even if you're not responsible for it. True, bringing that
- to public attention raises your risk factor, but that's a self-
- preservation issue, not an ethical one! In any case, your "if nobody
- knows it's a problem, it's not a problem" attitude is childish.
-
- >I would suggest that you chalk this up as one of life's many
- >"lessons", get on with your career, and try not to get in the same
- >situation a second time.
-
- Such situations are unavoidable. You cannot work in a multiuser
- environment without encountering security slipups. And a computer
- professional who takes no interest in how his system works and what
- might go wrong with it is in the wrong job.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 27 May 90 18:08:25 -0400
- From: Henry Mensch <henry@garp.mit.edu>
- Subject: Re: NYNEX's Info-Look
- Reply-To: henry@garp.mit.edu
-
-
- Part of the problem seems to be that just having a NYNEX calling card
- is not enough; you (seemingly) have to tell them what your card number
- (and PIN) is, so they can make you known to the system. This is
- obviously a bad idea, imho.
-
-
- # Henry Mensch / <henry@garp.mit.edu> / E40-379 MIT, Cambridge, MA
- # <hmensch@uk.ac.nsfnet-relay> / <henry@tts.lth.se> / <mensch@munnari.oz.au>
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 27 May 90 19:44:46 EDT
- From: Mike Riddle <Mike.Riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Reply-to: Mike.Riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org
-
-
- Jeremy Goldberg asked about technical specifications for Data Access
- Lines, and received many good replies. One of his basic reason for
- asking, however, has not been addressed.
-
- Jeremy wants to use a Telebit 9600 bps modem, and his version of Ma
- Bell said that only < 2400 was guaranteed on a voice line. My
- understanding is that a 9600 bps modem actually operates at 2400 baud,
- with 4 levels, creating a 9600 bps signal. This method was used
- precisely because of the inherent bandwidth of a "normal" voice line.
- It seems to me that whoever told him 9600 wouldn't work on a "normal"
- line either didn't understand 9600 bps methodology or was trying to
- sell up.
-
- Can anyone smarter than I (that's most of you) comment on this aspect
- of his problem?
-
-
- Ybbat (DRBBS) 8.9 v. 3.11 r.3
- * Origin: [1:285/27@fidonet] The Inns of Court 402/593-1192 (1:285/27.0)
-
- Through FidoNet gateway node 1:16/390
- Mike.Riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 02:59:29 PDT
- From: Linc Madison <rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: Remote Location Telephone Service
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- In article <8174@accuvax.nwu.edu> Joe Szewczak writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 379, Message 5 of 12
-
- >Would you please refer this request for information to the appropriate
- >place or person:
-
- > Deep Springs College, a small (24 students) and unique academic
- >institution located on the CA-NV border is seeking to improve its
- >present telephone service. ...
- >Please respond to:
-
- > Joe Szewczak <ME301007@brownwm.brown.edu>
- ^^^^^^^
-
- Probably just a typo, but... Just in case anyone tried to answer this
- one and got bounced, the address should be brownVm instead of brownWm
- , unless Camp Bruno has added a new machine.
-
-
- Linc Madison = rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu
- I have no connection to either Deep Springs College or Brown Univ.
-
- [Moderator's Note: It was a typo, and should 'brownvm'. Sorry. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 03:12:35 PDT
- From: Linc Madison <rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- Well, my own Sainted Mother not-so-very-many years ago asked me where to
- find the "plus" for "one-plus" dialing.... (Realio-trulio)
-
-
- Linc Madison = rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun May 27 08:54:15 1990
- From: Craig Dickson <craig@gendep.info.com>
- Subject: Re: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons
-
-
- This isn't strictly a telecom matter, but I was reminded of it by your
- recent remark along the lines of, "If you want to know how stupid
- people can be, try working on a telephone switchboard."
-
- A friend of mine works for a bank here in California, in the
- Electronic Fund Transfer (I think that's what they call it)
- department. If you think you get dummies on a switchboard, then you
- have no idea what people will do with ATM's.
-
- People feed ATM's all sorts of cards. Drivers licenses, Social
- Security cards, anything. People damage their cards and try to tape
- them back together. One idiot even tried to feed a machine a card
- that had been torn in half and then STAPLED back together. (After the
- repair bill the bank sent him, he probably will never do that again.)
- Some people try to TALK to the machines.
-
- But this is my all-time favorite of the weird-but-true anecdotes she
- tells me:
-
- A couple of weeks after San Francisco's davastating earthquake last
- year, she got an irate call from a customer in that city, demanding to
- know why his local ATM still wasn't working. She asked what branch
- that was, and he said, "The Marina branch."
-
- After taking a few seconds to recover from her surprise, she said, as
- calmly as possible, "Does the fact that the building is missing two
- walls and the roof suggest anything to you?"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #391
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa04479;
- 28 May 90 15:57 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa27475;
- 28 May 90 14:31 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab29290;
- 28 May 90 13:27 CDT
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 13:08:46 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #392
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005281308.ab00374@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Mon, 28 May 90 13:08:00 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 392
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- My List of North American Area Codes [Michael A. Shiels]
- My List of World Wide Codes [Michael A. Shiels]
- 900-based Legal Services: A Report [Leonard P. Levine]
- Re: New Phone Tax Hits California Users [Linc Madison]
- Unitel Long Distance Bid in Canada [TELECOM Moderator]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: My List of North American Area Codes
- Reply-To: "Michael A. Shiels" <tmsoft!mshiels@uunet.uu.net>
- Organization: MaS Network Software and Consulting
- Date: 27 May 90 12:52:35 EDT (Sun)
- From: tmsoft!mshiels@uunet.uu.net
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Although we have run similar lists from time to
- time, since new readers are always asking for a copy and not everyone
- has access to the Telecom Archives, here is another copy. This one is
- somewhat more up to date, since it includes projections for the next
- two years. PT]
-
- 1-200- (Unused) 1-201- New Jersey 1-202- Washington DC
- 1-203- Connecticut 1-204- Manitoba 1-205- Alabama
- 1-206- Washington 1-207- Maine 1-208- Idaho
- 1-209- California 1-210- (Unused) 1-211- (Unused)
- 1-212- New York NY 1-213- Los Angeles CA 1-214- Texas
- 1-215- Pennsylvania 1-216- Ohio 1-217- Illinois
- 1-218- Minnesota 1-219- Indiana 1-300- (Unused)
- 1-301- Maryland 1-302- Delaware 1-303- Colorado
- 1-304- West Virginia 1-305- Florida 1-306- Saskatchewan
- 1-307- Wyoming 1-308- Nebraska 1-309- Illinois
- 1-310- Los Angeles, CA (effective '92) 1-311- (Unused)
- 1-312- Chicago IL 1-313- Detroit MI 1-314- Missouri
- 1-315- New York 1-316- Kansas 1-317- Indiana
- 1-318- Louisiana 1-319- Iowa 1-400- (Unused)
- 1-401- Rhode Island 1-402- Nebraska 1-403- AB,NWT,Yukon
- 1-404- Georgia 1-405- Oklahoma 1-406- Montana
- 1-407- Florida 1-408- California 1-409- Texas
- 1-410- (Unused) 1-411- (Unused) 1-412- Pennsylvania
- 1-413- Massachusetts 1-414- Wisconsin 1-415- San Fran, CA
- 1-417- Missouri 1-418- Quebec 1-419- Ohio
- 1-500- (Unused) 1-501- Arkansas 1-502- Kentucky
- 1-503- Oregon 1-504- Louisiana 1-505- New Mexico
- 1-506- New Brunswick 1-507- New Mexico 1-508- Massachusetts
- 1-509- Washington 1-510- California (effective '91)
- 1-511- (Unused) 1-512- Texas 1-513- Ohio
- 1-514- Montreal, PQ 1-515- Iowa 1-516- New York
- 1-517- Michigan 1-518- New York 1-519- S.W. Ontario
- 1-600- (Unused) 1-601- Mississippi 1-602- Arizona
- 1-603- New Hampshire 1-604- British Columbia 1-605- South Dakota
- 1-606- Kentucky 1-607- New York 1-608- Wisconsin
- 1-609- New Jersey 1-610- (TWX - Unused) 1-611- (Unused)
- 1-612- Minnesota 1-613- Ottawa,Kingston ON 1-614- Ohio
- 1-615- Tennessee 1-616- Michigan 1-617- Massachusetts
- 1-618- Illinois 1-619- California 1-700- Special Services
- 1-701- North Dakota 1-702- Nevada 1-703- Virginia
- 1-704- North Carolina 1-705- Barrie, Peterborough, North Bay ON
- 1-706- (was Mexico - currently unused) 1-707- California
- 1-708- Chgo. Suburbs, IL 1-709- Newfoundland 1-710- Federal Gov't
- 1-711- (Unused) 1-712- Iowa 1-713- Texas
- 1-714- California 1-715- Wisconsin 1-716- New York
- 1-717- Pennsylvania 1-718- New York, NY 1-719- Colorado
- 1-800- 800 Service (toll-free) 1-801- Utah
- 1-802- Vermont 1-803- South Carolina 1-804- Virginia
- 1-805- California 1-806- Texas 1-807- NW Ontario
- 1-808- Hawaii 1-809- Various Caribbean Islands; Puerto Rico
- 1-810- (TWX - Unused) 1-811- (Unused) 1-812- Indiana
- 1-813- Florida 1-814- Pennsylvania 1-815- Illinois
- 1-816- Missouri 1-817- Texas 1-818- California
- 1-819- Western Quebec, eastern NWT
- 1-900- 900 service - can be costly! 1-901- Tennessee
- 1-902- Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island
- 1-903- Texas (effective fall '90) 1-904- Florida
- 1-905- (was Mexico City - now unused) 1-906- Michigan
- 1-907- Alaska 1-908- New Jersey (effective early '91)
- 1-909- (currently unused) 1-910- (TWX - Unused) 1-911- (Unused)
- 1-912- Georgia 1-913- Kansas 1-914- New York
- 1-915- Texas 1-916- California1 1-917- (unused)
- 1-918- Oklahoma 1-919- North Carolina
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: My List of World Wide Codes
- Reply-To: "Michael A. Shiels" <tmsoft!mshiels@uunet.uu.net>
- Organization: MaS Network Software and Consulting
- Date: 27 May 90 12:57:17 EDT (Sun)
- From: tmsoft!mshiels@uunet.uu.net
-
-
- 20- Egypt 210- (reserved for Morocco)
- 211- (reserved for Morocco) 212- Morocco
- 213- Algeria 214- (reserved for Algeria)
- 215- (reserved for Algeria) 216- Tunisia
- 217- (reserved for Tunisia) 218- Libya
- 219- (reserved for Libya) 220- Gambia
- 221- Senegal 222- Mauritania
- 223- Mali 224- Guinea
- 225- Cote d'Ivoire 226- Burkina Faso
- 227- Niger 228- Togolese Republic
- 229- Benin 230- Mauritius
- 231- Liberia 232- Sierra Leone
- 233- Ghana 234- Nigeria
- 235- Chad 236- Central African Republic
- 237- Cameroon 238- Cape Verde
- 239- Sao Tome & Principe 240- Equatorial Guinea
- 241- Gabonese Republic 242- Congo
- 243- Zaire 244- Angola
- 245- Guinea-Bissau 246- Diego-Garcia
- 247- Ascension 248- Seychelles
- 249- Sudan 250- Rwandese Republic
- 251- Ethiopia 252- Somalia
- 253- Djibouti 254- Kenya
- 255- Tanzania 256- Uganda
- 257- Burundi 258- Mozambique
- 259- Zanzibar (Tanzania) 260- Zambia
- 261- Madagascar 262- Reunion (French Republic)
- 263- Zimbabwe 264- Namibia
- 265- Malawi 266- Lesotho
- 267- Botswana 268- Swaziland
- 269- Mayotte Island 27- South Africa
- 297- Aruba 298- Faroe Islands
- 299- Greenland 30- Greece
- 31- Netherlands 32- Belgium
- 33- France, Andorra, Monaco 34- Spain
- 350- Gibraltar 351- Portugal
- 352- Luxembourg 353- Eire (Irish Republic)
- 354- Iceland 355- Albania
- 356- Malta 357- Cyprus
- 358- Finland 359- Bulgaria
- 36- Hungary 37- East Germany
- 38- Yugoslavia 39- Italy, San Marino
- 40- Romania 41- Switzerland, Liechtenstein
- 42- Czechoslovakia 43- Austria
- 44- United Kingdom 45- Denmark
- 46- Sweden 47- Norway
- 48- Poland 49- West Germany
- 500- Falkland Islands 501- Belize
- 502- Guatemala 503- El Salvador
- 504- Honduras 505- Nicaragua
- 506- Costa Rica 507- Panama
- 508- St Pierre & Miquelon 509- Haiti
- 51- Peru 52- Mexico
- 53- Cuba 54- Argentina
- 55- Brazil 56- Chile
- 57- Colombia 58- Venezuela
- 590- Guadeloupe 591- Bolivia
- 592- Guyana 593- Ecuador
- 594- Guiana (French) 95- Paraguay
- 596- French Antilles 97- Suriname
- 598- Uruguay (East Republic) 599- Netherlands Antilles
- 60- Malaysia 61- Australia
- 62- Indonesia 63- Philippines
- 64- New Zealand 65- Singapore
- 66- Thailand 670- Marianna Islands
- 671- Guam 672- Christmas, Cocos, Norfolk Is.
- 673- Brunei Darrusalm 74- Nauru
- 675- Papua New Guinea 676- Tonga
- 677- Solomon Islands 678- Vanuatu
- 679- Fiji Islands 680- Palau
- 681- Wallis and Fortuna 682- Cook Islands
- 683- Niue Island 684- American Samoa
- 685- Western Samoa 686- Kiribati
- 687- New Caledonia 688- Tuvalu, Saipan
- 689- French Polynesia 690- Tokelan
- 691- F.S. of Polynesia 692- Marshall Islands
- 7- The Soviet Union 81- Japan
- 82- South Korea 84- Vietnam
- 850- North Korea (Democratic Rep)852- Hong Kong
- 853- Macao 855- Kampuchea
- 856- Laos 86- China
- 871- Inmarsat (Atlantic) 872- Inmarsat (Pacific)
- 873- Inmarsat (Indian) 880- Bangladesh
- 886- Taiwan 90- Turkey
- 91- India 92- Pakistan
- 93- Afghanistan 94- Sri Lanka
- 95- Burma 960- Maldives
- 961- Lebanon 962- Jordan
- 963- Syrian Arab Republic 964- Iraq
- 965- Kuwait 966- Saudi Arabia
- 967- Yemen Arab Republic 968- Oman
- 969- Yemen Democratic Republic 971- United Arab Emirates
- 972- Israel 73- Bahrain
- 974- Qatar 976- Mongolia
- 977- Nepal 98- Iran
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: The above are always prefaced with either 011 (for
- direct dialing) or 01 (for credit card, collect or third number
- billing). Then a city code, comparable to a USA area code, follows the
- above in most cases, prior to the actual local number. Countries not
- listed above are not dialable; calls for those points are made through
- the operator. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Leonard P Levine <len@csd4.csd.uwm.edu>
- Subject: 900-based Legal Services; A Report
- Date: 28 May 90 16:10:52 GMT
- Reply-To: len@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
-
-
- This is a report about an article in a freebee magazine concerning a
- legal firm that deals with clients exclusively over a 900 based
- telephone line. The magazine can be reached at InfoText Magazine;
- 34700 Coast Highway, suite 309; Capistrano Beach, CA 92624; (714)
- 493-2434. Needless to say I have no affiliation except as a
- subscriber.
-
- Beginning on page 34 of the May 1990 issue is a report of an interview
- with Michael Cane, founder of the company. Cane reported the
- following numbers: More than 40 calls per day at $3.00/minute are
- received with the average call running 13 minutes. (I compute that
- this brings them $400,000/year.) The article describes the staff
- indicating only that two are receptionists but shows a picture of 12
- people captioned as "the staff at Tele-Lawyer".
-
- The on line computerized database of information used is discussed,
- the problems in working with 900 based services in California is
- addressed, and advertising problems are covered. Services described
- include business, personal injury, tax, family, debtor/creditor rights
- and bankruptcy, real estate, landlord-tenant, immigration, criminal
- law and procedure, probate, retirement/social security, and consumer
- protection. Printed responses from the company are by fax or mail,
- and legal forms are available.
-
- This is the first report I have seen about a non-sleeze 900 service.
- I have no idea how well it can work but think that the numbers and
- facts reported above will be interesting to this audience.
-
- About the magazine, there are EXTENSIVE advertisements for 900
- equipment providers (people who provide 900-based systems for people
- like the lawyer above) and articles of some interest. The May issue
- has an article by Senator Kohl (WI) discussing his bill in favor of
- Caller ID with call blocking and call trace. None of the ideas he
- presents are foreign to this audience but it is a pleasure to see them
- expressed by my Senator.
-
- The magazine has a 900 number permitting people who want to subscribe
- to this controlled-circulation (free for first 12 months) magazine to
- do so for a one time $9.95 charge (gotcha). Sorry folks, I just do
- not remember that number.
-
-
- | Leonard P. Levine e-mail len@cs.uwm.edu |
- | Professor, Computer Science Office (414) 229-5170 |
- | University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Home (414) 962-4719 |
- | Milwaukee, WI 53201 U.S.A. FAX (414) 229-6958 |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 03:53:18 PDT
- From: Linc Madison <rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Re: New Phone Tax Hits California Users
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
-
-
- In article <8242@accuvax.nwu.edu> Patrick writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 383, Message 8 of 9
-
- >The {Los Angeles Times} reports that telephone customers in Los
- >Angeles and throughout the state will pay an increased tax of 3.4% on
- >their long-distance calls within California, effective July 1, to help
- >pay for basic telephone service for low-income households.
-
- As I understand it, the flat fee each subscriber paid to underwrite
- Universal Lifeline service is switching to a percentage tax. I'm a
- little puzzled, though, 'cause I thought they already did this -- for
- which reason I now see blurbs in my MCI and Sprint bills. (Maybe that
- one was the TDD tax or the 911 tax or one of the others.)
-
- That touches on another issue that I was about to write about, though:
- Sprint has recently (beginning of the year?) decided to apply the city
- of Berkeley's local utility tax to *all* of my long-distance calls
- instead of only the in-state calls. I find this rather curious since
- it's illegal for the city of Berkeley to tax out-of-state calls.
- Also, neither MCI (on an MCI Card with a Berkeley billing address) nor
- AT&T (on 10288 calls from my home number) bills city utility tax on
- out-of state calls.
-
- I called Sprint and got a considerable run-around (including being
- told to call back to a number in Burlingame -- long-distance!) and
- then was told, "yes, we applied the 6.5% city utility tax to all of
- your calls." Yes, I noticed that. That doesn't answer my question
- as to what gives them the (mistaken) impression it's legal.
-
- This tax, by the way, is general revenue for the city. Thank you,
- Prop's 4 and 13!
-
-
- Linc Madison = rmadison@euler.berkeley.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 10:57:50 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Unitel Long Distance Bid in Canada
-
-
- A new exhibit in the TELECOM Archives file is a copy of the petition
- filed by Unitel to become an authorized long distance carrier in
- Canada. This file was supplied by our Canadian reader, David Leibold.
-
- Also I want to point out that due to the increasing size of the
- archives, some sub-directories are being being established at this
- time. All security/phreak/phraud files are being moved into a
- sub-directory. Some additional movement of files will be done of this
- nature, so you might want to review the main directory and
- sub-directories carefully next time you pull a file.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
- TELECOM Moderator
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #392
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa07331;
- 28 May 90 17:00 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa08195;
- 28 May 90 15:35 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab27475;
- 28 May 90 14:31 CDT
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 13:45:59 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #393
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005281346.ab25232@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Mon, 28 May 90 13:45:43 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 393
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Mobile Data Terminals [Roger Theriault]
- Re: FCC REN's [Julian Macassey]
- M.S. Thesis on Ohio Computer Network [Alex Cruz and Jane Fraser]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Roger Theriault <mdivax1!theriaul>
- Subject: Mobile Data Terminals
- Date: 28 May 90 16:27:22 GMT
- Reply-To: mdivax1!theriaul (Roger Theriault)
- Organization: Mobile Data International, Richmond, B.C., Canada
-
-
- I have noticed some discussion here recently about mobile data
- technology (terminals in police cars - is it for real?) and can assure
- telecom readers that indeed this technology is here - the company I
- work for, Mobile Data International (MDI), designs and manufactures
- complete mobile data communications systems.
-
- In addition to the police cars mentioned already, you can find
- terminals in your favorite taxicab, fire trucks, ambulances and EMT
- vehicles, and utility vehicles such as gas companies, electric,
- cablevision, and even automobile association vehicles. Federal
- Express trucks all have them (the secret of their success?) and other
- applications are just now being invented.
-
- This is not that new, just check out the October, 1982 issue of
- National Geographic for a photo of the Vancouver Police Department's
- MDT. A recent rerun of "Hill Street Blues" showed what these terminals
- can do. The police can use their terminals to check licence plates
- before they approach a vehicle they have stopped. In some cases this
- has saved the lives of the officers when they approach a suspected
- murderer etc...
-
- >From: henry@garp.mit.edu (Henry Mensch)
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 390, Message 6 of 7
-
- (Henry discloses a letter from Boston Gas Company)
- >We will then be able to read your meter accurately by radio
- >signal from a computer equipped van as we drive down your street.
-
- I must admit don't know anything about the meter-reading stuff, but
- Boston Gas will also have MDTs (Mobile Data Terminals) in their
- vehicles, which communicate with the gas company dispatchers. These
- terminals do not communicate with the gas meters, but I would expect
- there would be some sort of additional system in the truck to do so.
- The terminals are used to dispatch trucks for repair work, and the
- technicians can query the company mainframe for additional details.
-
- >From: claris!netcom!ergo@ames.arc.nasa.gov (Isaac Rabinovitch)
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 389, Message 1 of 10
-
- >claris!netcom!onymouse@ames.arc.nasa.gov (John Debert) writes:
- >(about computer terminals in police cars)
- >>I have heard the transmissions to and from these units and estimate
- >>the rate at about 1200baud. It shouldn't be too hard for someone with
- >>perhaps a TNC to connect their scanner to a terminal and read the
- >>traffic.
-
- >True. But it ought to be possible to encrypt transmissions, if they
- >haven't already done so. I don't know if it's actually possible to
- >provide an unbreakable encryption method (this was claimed at one
- >time; I haven't followed the issue closely but I understand there are
- >doubts) but at least it can put evesdropping out of the reach of the
- >less resourceful villains.
-
- I'm afraid that even without an encryption method, due to the error
- correction algorithms, etc ... it would be next to impossible for a
- villain to listen to such data traffic. And if he could, why does he
- need to steal to make a living??
-
- >From: gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore)
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 384, Message 1 of 11
-
- >whole idea is to sell more yak-wuile-you-drive to yups, they don't
- >have any idea where the real portable digital markets are at. Real
- >workstations will be palm-sized and portable in 1993 or so, long
- >before the telcos are ready to network them *cheaply* in an office or
- >neighborhood while having them able to remain online on the net (at a
- >price) while traveling all over the country. What hacker,
- >stockbroker, student, reporter, ... would be without one? Anybody got
- >an angle by which we can bypass the telcos and do it right while they
- >blunder?
-
- If I'm not mistaken, there are nationwide data networks available
- right now. They are *NOT* run by the telcos, to my knowledge.
-
- In my opinion, cellular phones are for talking on. I can't understand
- why anyone would want to connect a fax machine to one. It is like
- encoding a tv signal and transmitting it on a voice-grade phone line,
- isn't it? If the coax (or fibre) exists, use it! Then, later, stick
- a phone on the extra bandwidth... (just my humble opinion :-)
-
- DISCLAIMER: I do not speak for Motorola Inc. or MDI. The opinions related
- in this message are all mine, and the fact that I am a proud employee of
- MDI may color my commentary, but that is my fault, not my employer's.
-
-
- Roger Theriault mdivax1!theriaul@van-bc.wimsey.bc.ca
- {uw-beaver,uunet}!van-bc!mdivax1!theriaul
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Julian Macassey <julian@bongo.uucp>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN's
- Date: 28 May 90 16:48:59 GMT
- Organization: The Hole in the Wall Hollywood California U.S.A.
-
-
- In article <8316@accuvax.nwu.edu>, dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (David
- Tamkin) writes:
-
- > In volume 10, issue 386, Tad Cook and Julian Macassey both replied to
- > my earlier questions about ringer equivalency numbers. Below, "DT>"
- > prefaces what I asked in an earlier submission. My current comments
- > are flush left.
-
- > DT> 1. What does the B or A after an REN mean?
-
- > TC> A B type ringer must respond to 16 to 68 Hz ringing frequency, and
- > TC> an A ringer only responds to 20 or 30 Hz, +/- 3 Hz.
-
- > Frequency of what, if I may ask? That question has been slid on past
- > throughout this discussion under the assumption that everyone must
- > already know. It certainly isn't the pitch of the ringer's sound, and
- > it isn't the frequency at which the AC is alternated...or is it?
-
- This is the frequency of the AC ringing voltage. The standard
- ringing signal is a voltage between 40 and 150 Volts at 20 Hz. The
- ringer has a capacitor between it and the phone line. This cap blocks
- DC voltage so it doesn't ring when the normal 48V DC line voltage is
- on the line. The capacitor (0.47 uF for Gong ringers, 1 uF for
- electronic ringers usually) passes AC blocks DC. Yes, I know gong
- ringers will not ring when DC voltage is applied across them, they
- will just consume power relative to their DC resistance. But
- electronic ringers will warble merrily with DC across them. So yes,
- the Hz thing is the frequency at which the AC is alternated.
-
- > DT> 2. If the ringer on a telephone can be turned off, does it no longer
- > DT> count in figuring the total REN load on a line?
-
- > recognizing *whether* to sound the ringer?
-
- As I have stated before, the REN is a measure of the power
- consumed by the ringer. Tad Cook was not really correct in stating
- that turning the ringer off removes the load. As a rule, it doesn't,
- it just silences the transducer. In a gong ringer, it merely
- mechanically stills the clapper. This means that power is being
- consumed. My previous posting rambled on this at some length. A ringer
- is not a "logic" device, it doesn't make decisions, it is like a light
- bulb. Light bulbs consume power, a 100 Watt bulb uses half the power
- of a 200 Watt lighbulb. A circuit can only tolerate so many watts
- (usually stated in Amps because the Voltage is known). Put too many
- light bulbs on a circuit and you blow a breaker. If you used a small
- generator or battery and put too many light bulbs on the circuit, they
- would get dimmer if you added too many. If you put enough on, they
- would lower the voltage so much that they would cease to glow,
- although collectively they would consume all the power the gerator
- could put out. With the Electrical grid pumping out megawatts it takes
- special circumstances to cause these "brownouts". Alas, the ringing
- generator at the phone company is five Watts or so and over five
- ringers is liable to cause a brownout.
-
- > Good point; I realized that myself after rereading my own words in the
- > Digest. Somebody had said that yes, there could be 0 REN's: look at a
- > modem or an answering machine for examples. So I looked at my modem
- > and at my answering machine (which reads 0.4 B) and said, gee, hey,
- > these numbers are not zero.
-
- Yes, as I said before, if it consumes less than 0.1 REN it is
- registered as 0.0. To know that a line is ringing and pick up a line
- as a modem, phone answering machine, voice mail system would do, you
- just need to detect that old AC voltage. You do not need to consume
- the voltage to drive relays etc, you can use the electrical company to
- do that.
-
- But many modems and answering machines consume ringing power
- to drive circuitry, some even use a ringer chip and then use the
- rectified output of the ringer chip to drive logic. A KISS approach
- that uses power. You don't have to do it this way, but it is neat and
- simple. Also most modems are the only device on the line so the power
- consumption is not important. Answering machines on the other hand
- almost always share the line with other devices - yes phones with real
- ringers - so can often be the straw that breaks the camels back. Often
- the first device to malfunction when too many ringers get on the line
- is the phone answering machine. I have found that Panasonic answering
- machines, despite all the wonderful things I say about them, to be the
- most sensitive to ringing voltage. Yes, as you add ringers (RENs) to
- the line, the ringing voltage will drop.
-
- > DT> 1. What does the B or A after an REN mean?
-
- > JM> I think I covered this in an earlier posting, but then I could have
- > JM> glossed over it.
-
- > Maybe you did, but when you and the other techie types in this Digest
- > write at each other's level, my eyes (and the eyes of other readers)
- > glaze over and roll backwards. You could put "the surf was great off
- > Los Angeles today" into the middle and most of us wouldn't be able to
- > read through the technical stuff to find that. Yes, this digest-cum-
- > noozgroop is the place to discuss the technical end as well as the
- > user's end, but please understand that a non-techie reader like me can
- > miss something written deep inside an incomprehensible submission
- > about the specifics of the guts of wires and switches.
-
- I have done my best to explain this stuff to the non
- technical. But I assume that if someone wants to know how a ringer
- works that they do understand Ohms law and a few basics. To explain it
- to my mother, I would just say, ringers use power just like light
- bulbs and you cant have too many. When you turn off a ringer, you
- don't switch it off like a light bulb, you just mute it's output, like
- putting a black bag over a light bulb. But then I assume my mother
- doesn't read this stuff. She doesn't think I understand any of it
- anyhow. My neighbour says that Malibu had radical waves this morning.
-
- > If it's any consolation, if you did cover that in another posting, you
- > probably explained it in a way I couldn't have understood if I had
- > read it, so I'd have had to ask again regardless.
-
- > DT> 2. If the ringer on a telephone can be turned off, does it no longer
- > DT> count in figuring the total REN load on a line?
-
- > JM> [Essentially, Macassey's reply was that if you shut off the ringer
- > JM> switch on the outside of the telephone, no, but if you open the
- > JM> phone up and disconnect the wiring to the entire ringing circuit
- > JM> (not just the part that makes the noise), yes. At least I guess
- > JM> that's what he was trying to say.]
-
- Yes, he is saying exactly that. See my "mother explanation" above.
-
- > All I know is this: if the phones whose ringers I have shut off do
- > count toward the allowed REN total, it beats the heck out of me how
- > the remaining ones still ring loud enough to wake me up when my mother
- > decides to play alarm clock.
-
- Well if you have five REN 1 ringers and they all ring when
- "on" and you shut off four then the remaining on ringer will ring. The
- other four are still consuming power, but you can't hear them. Just
- like black bags over light bulbs, you can't see the light, but you are
- still consuming power. So of course the remaining ones will still ring
- loud enough. Why shouldn't they? They did before you turned some off,
- but the load on the line is the same.
-
- > JM> ... In truth, all modems I have seen are type B ringers. To prove
- > JM> this, feed say 60V at 60 Hz (yes power via a regular transformer)
- > JM> to a modem; betya it picks up if in answer mode.
-
- > May those among the readership who do not own the equipment to feed
- > voltage X at frequency Y into the inwards of appliance Z nor the tools
- > and know-how to fix the damage afterward be excused from this project,
- > please? "Betya" you didn't know there were any of us here.
-
- Ok, so I mentioned the simplest, cheapest, easiest way to test
- a ringer. Use a regular Rat Shack power transformer. This is so if
- anyone who want's to mess with wires to prove or disprove what I say
- can do it.
-
- If anyone really wants to know more etc, they can always
- mail me, phone me or even take me out to eat in a really sleezy and
- disreputable joint and pick my brains. It is not my intent to
- obfuscate this stuff, I leave that to professionals - the writers of
- computer manuals (-:
-
-
- Julian Macassey, n6are julian@bongo.info.com ucla-an!denwa!bongo!julian
- N6ARE@K6IYK (Packet Radio) n6are.ampr.org [44.16.0.81] voice (213) 653-4495
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 13:55 EDT
- From: FRASER@ccl2.eng.ohio-state.edu
- Subject: M.S. Thesis on Ohio Computer Network
-
-
- Recently, we requested help from the readers for a M.S. thesis in
- progress. We received many helpful responses and would like to thank
- you for your help.
-
- The completed M.S. thesis is now available from CAST, the Center for
- Advanced Study in Telecommunications, at the Ohio State University.
- The thesis is an evaluation of an Ohio public computer network for
- small and medium size companies.
-
- You can obtain a copy of the thesis by replying to this posting; by
- writing to CAST, The Ohio State University, 210 Baker Systems, 1971
- Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210; or by calling 614-292-8444.
-
- We are distributing it free of charge in the hope that you will pass
- it along to other readers and that you will give us feedback on the
- content.
-
- The thesis will also form the basis for a one-day symposium to be held
- in Columbus on Thursday, August 9. The rest of this posting is a
- background description for the symposium.
-
- ----------
-
- Computer networks are proliferating. Some networks are supported by
- public funds supported for education and research purposes, for
- example, BITNET. Many small bulletin boards are privately run to
- serve the interest groups of hobbyists. Commercial networks, such as
- Compuserve, provide networks for business purposes for a fee, often
- quite large.
-
- Existing computer network do not address the business needs of small
- and medium sized companies. Since such companies often provide a
- great deal of employment and a great deal of growth in employment, but
- are often technologically behind larger companies, there are large
- opportunities to enhance economic development by providing various
- services to such companies. Services might include electronic mail,
- electronic file exchange, bulletin boards, and access to large
- computers.
-
- Development of such a network might be a suitable use of public funds.
- The State of Ohio might consider encouraging such a network as a way
- of aiding small and medium sized companies to grow and to convert to
- producing products needed in a peace economy. Several other states
- (and several countries in Europe) have started such networks.
-
- The next CAST symposium, tentatively scheduled for August 9 in
- Columbus, will address three questions concerning public computer
- networks for small and medium sized companies: what is, what could be
- and what should be. We anticipate having speakers on using
- telecommunications for economic development, on existing networks in
- Ohio, in other states, and perhaps in Europe, and on the State of
- Ohio's activities in economic development.
-
- Alex Cruz
- Jane Fraser
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #393
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa09902;
- 29 May 90 5:34 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa23551;
- 29 May 90 3:42 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa01459;
- 29 May 90 2:37 CDT
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 1:54:01 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #394
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005290154.ab29927@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Tue, 29 May 90 01:52:58 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 394
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Telecom Magic '90: Walt Disney Seminar [TELECOM Moderator]
- Translating Alpha Phone Numbers [Todd Inch]
- Re: Customized Telephone Numbers [Ray Spalding]
- Re: Bibliography: Sysop Liability [Peter Weiss]
- Re: AT&T "Excellence" [Todd Inch]
- Re: Data Access Lines [John Higdon]
- Re: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development [John Gilmore]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [Michael Coleman]
- Re: TDD Long Distance Discount [John Gilmore]
- Are You a Phreak and/or Cracker? [TELECOM Moderator]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 0:43:55 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Telecom Magic '90: Walt Disney Seminar
-
-
- Walt Disney World is doing something unique late this summer. In
- connection with their telephone company subsidiary 'Vista-United
- Communications', they are offering a four day seminar at their resort
- in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, September 7-10, 1990.
-
- This very detailed program will cover several aspects of
- telecommunications and will include an in-depth look at the operations
- of Vista-United.
-
- What the seminar includes:
-
- Opening night reception
- Breakfast and lunch each day
- All instruction and classroom materials
- List of all conference participants and presenters
- Reference manual of course content
- On-site guided tours examining the telecommunication operations at WDW
- One-on-one discussions and meetings with Disney telecom people
- Closing banquet and Disney extravaganza
- A Four-Day general passport good for admission to all parks; all exhibits
- One night's admission to Pleasure Island
- Free, unlimited use of the WDW transportation system
-
-
- The topics to be covered during the four day seminar include:
-
- Expanding Your ACD advantage
- The Team Approach to Managing Project Installations
- Preparing for the Unexpected: Disaster Recovery
- Network Management: A Close Look at Disney Telecom Operations
- Staying State of the Art
- The World of Fiber Optics
- Innovations in Technology
-
- Facilities tours will include:
-
- Walt Disney Travel Company, Inc. - the ACD handling traffic there.
- Walt Disney World Central Reservations Office - a meeting with the
- management of the telecom facilities in the world's largest
- central reservations operation. See the ACD there.
-
- Vista-United Telephone Company - a meeting with executives there to
- discuss the several components of their operation, including
- voicemail, pagers, pay telephones, operator services, cable installation,
- network management, and ISDN.
-
- Information Processing - a meeting with executives of the WDW
- Master Command Center. A look at the mainframes and other areas of
- the computer facilities.
-
- The cost: $995 per person for the four day seminar. This includes
- unlimited admission to *everything* in your spare time, as noted
- above, including breakfast and lunch daily, and the first and last
- night's dinners.
-
- Accomodations: All participants will be housed at the Disney
- Contemporary Resort. Rates are $145 - $180 per night, based on single
- or double occupancy. Two participants could easily share a room.
-
- Registration and information: Phone 407-363-6620 between 8:30 AM and
- 5:30 PM Eastern Time. Fax inquiries to 407-363-6636. If you prefer,
- you may write to:
-
- Walt Disney Seminar Productions
- Post Office Box 10,000
- Lake Buena Vista, FL 32830-1000
-
- You may call the above number to receive a complete copy of the
- brochure (eight pages) I used to type the excerpts above if you want a
- fully detailed schedule of classes, tours and exhibitions in the
- seminar.
-
- I think it is safe to say Mickey Mouse is not in charge of telecom and
- Goofy does not set the long distance rates at WDW. :) :)
-
- WDW/Vista-United seems to be a very well-run and very technically
- complex organization. If you can spare the bucks and the first week
- of September, I recommend attending.
-
-
- PT
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Subject: Translating Alpha Phone Numbers
- Reply-To: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Organization: Global Tech Int'l Inc.
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 22:36:05 GMT
-
-
- In article <8294@accuvax.nwu.edu> mailrus!uflorida!rm1!bapat@
- uunet.uu.net (Bapat) want's to convert phone numbers with letters
- to numeric, and has access to a Unix machine.
-
- The following should do it. "tr" will translate a character in the
- first string to a corresponding character in the second string.
-
- BTW: tr "[a-z]" "[A-Z]" will convert lower-case strings to all
- uppercase, which is irrelevant to this topic, but useful.
-
- -------------------- cut here ---------------------------
- :
- # Shell script to convert alpha-containing phone number to all numeric.
- # Put phone number on command line or wait for prompt.
- #
- if [ -z "$1" ]
- then
- echo "Phone number containing characters? \c"
- read phnnum
- else
- phnnum="$1"
- fi
- if echo "$phnnum" | grep 'q\|Q\|z\|Z' > /dev/null
- then
- echo "There's no Q or Z on the phone dial."
- exit 1
- fi
- echo "$phnnum" | tr "aAbBcCdDeEfFgGhHiIjJkKlLmMnNoOpPrRsStTuUvVwWxXyY" \
- "222222333333444444555555666666777777888888999999"
- exit
- -------------------- cut here ---------------------------
-
-
- Todd Inch, System Manager, Global Technology, Mukilteo WA (206) 742-9111
- UUCP: {smart-host}!gtisqr!toddi ARPA: gtisqr!toddi@beaver.cs.washington.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Ray Spalding <cc100aa%prism@gatech.edu>
- Subject: Re: Customized Telephone Numbers
- Date: 28 May 90 20:05:52 GMT
- Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology
-
-
- In article <8328@accuvax.nwu.edu> David Lesher <wb8foz@mthvax.cs.
- miami.edu> writes:
-
- >Alas, this seems to be another area where the LEC's get starry-eyed
- >and see:
- > Revenue Source!
- > Revenue Source!
-
- Indeed. On page 18 of the Atlanta directory, titled "Prices of
- Services", it says in part:
-
- Stylist(R) Service: Your phone number can "spell"
- a word by using the letters that correspond
- to your phone number...............$2.50 per month
-
- And, my experience has been that if you don't request this service,
- you get a number with zeros and/or ones in it -- they're reserving the
- "lettered" digits for people who are willing to pay for them.
-
-
- Ray Spalding, Office of Computing Services
- Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332-0275
- uucp: ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!cc100aa
- Internet: cc100aa@prism.gatech.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Penn State University
- Date: Monday, 28 May 1990 16:47:39 EDT
- From: Peter Weiss <PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Subject: Re: Bibliography: Sysop Liability
-
-
- More on this subject can be found in the telecom-archives via Anon.
- FTP lcs.mit.edu under sysops.libel.liability. Please note the
- extensive footnotes and references.
-
-
- Peter M. Weiss | 31 Shields Bldg | University Park, PA USA 16802
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: AT&T "Excellence"
- Reply-To: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Organization: Global Tech Int'l Inc.
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 22:45:02 GMT
-
-
- I wrote:
-
- >My wife called AT&T yesterday and asked them to drop our "Reach Out
- >Washington" (which wasn't saving us any money :-() and got the same
- >"Did I give you excellent service?" question at the end of the call.
-
- >Yes, she did get good service, the rep didn't try to talk her out of
- >it or anything and understood her request.
-
- Well, I just got the phone bill and they hadn't cancelled the plan.
-
- When we called, they couldn't find a record of the cancellation request.
-
- So much for "excellent service." Although they didn't ask this time,
- the rep did warn that "this call may be being monitored for excellent
- service" at the beginning of the call.
-
- Maybe we should have asked if we could change our response on that first
- call. :-)
-
-
- Todd Inch, System Manager, Global Technology, Mukilteo WA (206) 742-9111
- UUCP: {smart-host}!gtisqr!toddi ARPA: gtisqr!toddi@beaver.cs.washington.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Date: 28 May 90 13:21:35 PDT (Mon)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Mike Riddle <Mike.Riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org> writes:
-
- > My understanding is that a 9600 bps modem actually operates at 2400 baud,
- > with 4 levels, creating a 9600 bps signal. This method was used
- > precisely because of the inherent bandwidth of a "normal" voice line.
- > It seems to me that whoever told him 9600 wouldn't work on a "normal"
- > line either didn't understand 9600 bps methodology or was trying to
- > sell up.
-
- I don't have the reference in front of my and can't give a detailed
- explanation of PEP (Packetized Ensemble Protocol), but it is somewhat
- more complex than that. PEP (I don't know anything at all about the
- theory of v.32) tries for as many as 512 separate carriers (each
- operating very slowly) over the line. During training and negotiation,
- carriers that are unusable because of line quality are locked out.
- This is why PEP can be so variable in terms of throughput. If line
- conditions change significantly, the modems will renegotiate.
-
- 1200 and 2400 bps modems don't operate at 1200 and 2400 baud,
- respectively, but rather at a slower baud rate and carry 4 or 8 bits
- per baud. This is accomplished by introducing a phase (and in the case
- of 2400, amplitude) component.
-
- BTW, most people don't understand 9600 bps methodology.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 21:59:43 PDT
- From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
- Subject: Re: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development
-
-
- One of the engineers I spoke with about the digital cellular stuff
- wants it made clear that his opinions are only opinions, not word from
- on high. My statement that I spoke with "engineers" make him think
- that people will believe they're facts. Alas, if only people took my
- pronouncements as fact because I'm an engineer...
-
- So far nobody is claiming that the privacy of IS 54's digital cellular
- system is really great, just that it's slightly better than analog
- cellular. What burns me is that they could have made it *really
- great* with relatively trivial spec and software changes (encryption)
- but didn't bother. (Yes, the changes are "relatively" trivial if you
- examine the protocol they are running here.)
-
- He also wants a chance to retract the comment about Dynabooks and
- driving; given that a large majority of the cellular phones are
- currently sold for cars (my guess -- anyone have figures?), I can see
- why he would have equated cellular with car.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Michael Coleman <coleman@cs.ucla.edu>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
- Date: 29 May 90 05:41:17 GMT
-
-
- I visited Kansas City over the weekend and discovered an annoying
- quirk in the local phone system.
-
- I was trying to dial a number in Kansas (area code 913) from Missouri
- (816). The number was about 30 miles off, but is considered "local"
- in the sense that one just dials seven digits.
-
- Having been out of the area for a while, I dialed the normal 11 digits
- that one would dial in Los Angeles (for example) to do the same thing.
- The bizarre thing was that although I was calling from a residence, I
- got connected to a recording stating something along the lines of
- "This number cannot be dialed directly from a pay phone..."
-
- I called the operator, who gave a more helpful error message ("I think
- I know what's wrong...")
-
-
- Mike
-
- try. %% "When at first you
- try :- try. %% don't succeed, ..." (coleman@cs.ucla.edu)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 22:51:31 PDT
- From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
- Subject: Re: TDD Long Distance Discount
-
-
- > I can see doing it if the bandwidth
- > of TDD devices is so much smaller than voice that deaf people are
- > effectively paying more for less effective use of the same circuit for
- > the same amount of time as hearing people...
-
- KLH@nic.ddn.mil (Ken Harrenstien) wrote:
-
- > Indeed, this is the rationale. The standard figure in the literature
- > I've seen has been a 5:1 ratio; that is, a conversation via TDD takes
- > five times as long as a voice call to convey the same information.
-
- So, since I use Telebit modems and can send in two minutes what would
- take thirty minutes by voice, I should be charged 15x the voice rate for
- my long distance calls? I should move netnews over dozens of TDD's,
- so I can get those really cheap rates!
-
- Not only do deaf people burn up more time on the lines than the
- average subscriber, but they get charged less for it? Why don't they
- get surcharged instead, like BBS systems in some places?
-
- Besides the general public being ripped off to pay the phone bills of
- the deaf, there is also the topic of TDD design itself. Years ago, a
- few companies made combination TDD's with 300-baud modems as well as
- Weitbrecht modems built in. Most deaf people didn't buy them. That's
- why they are now stuck with 45 baud modems -- they didn't buy faster
- ones when they were offerred. Nowadays you could get 1200 or 2400 for
- the same price (it's all in one chip) but still they buy 45's.
-
- What is worse, California phone subscribers are also being ripped off
- so PacBell can BUY these obsolete devices and GIVE them to the deaf!
- I already object to their forcing me to subsidize deaf people as a
- class, but if I chose myself to subsidize any deaf people, I'd at
- least give them a decent modem, or a fax machine, not this trash.
-
- > Oh yeah, while I'm ranting about bills, [various rants about the
- > California Relay Service, a "free" service that lets deaf people TDD
- > to the service which reads their message to hearing people and vice
- > verse. By "free" I mean "you and I pay for it, not its users".]
-
- Why isn't there a free relay service for email users to send to and
- receive from fax machines? I mean, we are at a severe disadvantage
- when *everybody* has a fax machine except us! Or howabout a
- Fax-to-voice service for the blind? And a voice-to-explanations
- service for the stupid? How can you advocate helping the deaf without
- helping all the other "deserving" multitudes?
-
- Personally I think helping people should be voluntary. I don't like
- the kind of "help" the government gives.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 1:35:10 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Are You a Phreak and/or Cracker?
-
-
- The subject line says it all: It is time for the first annual poll of
- TELECOM Digest readers, to detirmine how many of you fit into one of
- the above categories.
-
- The two questions I would like answered are:
-
- 1) Have you made one or more phraud calls in the past six months?
- (yes or no)
-
- 2) Have you broken into a computer, or gained unlawful access to a
- computer in the past six months? (yes or no)
-
- I realize these are rather sensitive questions to ask, and since most
- of you probably do not know how to send an anonymous message over the
- net, I have provided a work-around.
-
- I want you to flip a coin, any coin. Don't tell me how it lands.
- If it lands heads up, answer the above two questions truthfully. If it
- lands tails up, then answer these two questions instead:
-
- 1) Have you eaten a hamburger for lunch in the past two weeks?
- (yes or no)
-
- 2) Have you gone inside the usual bank you do business with in the
- past two weeks? (yes or no)
-
- Based on the coin-flip, answer the first two questions or the last two
- questions. Send a message to 'telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu' with the
- subject header 'questions', and a single line of text using the
- appropriate text from the following:
-
- 1. Yes Yes
- 2. No Yes
- 3. Yes No
- 4. No No
-
- Please do not include anything for the Digest and do not include
- personal comments you want me to answer. Repeat: DO NOT advise me of
- the results of the coin-toss. The results will be posted here in a
- couple weeks.
-
-
- Patrick Townson
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #394
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa05850;
- 30 May 90 4:37 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa00712;
- 30 May 90 2:53 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa02757;
- 30 May 90 1:48 CDT
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 1:03:23 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #395
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005300103.ab23287@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 30 May 90 01:03:11 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 395
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Data Access Lines [Rob Warnock]
- Re: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development [Don Alvarez]
- Re: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development [Patrick L. Reilly]
- Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter" [Dan Johnson]
- Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter" [Jon Baker]
- Re: 10XXX Bugs [Dan Lance]
- Re: Correction to 908 Areacode Exchange List [Carl Moore]
- Re: Correction to 908 Areacode Exchange List [Tom Lowe]
- Re: Customized Telephone Numbers [Amanda Walker]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 05:22:18 GMT
- From: Rob Warnock <rpw3%rigden.wpd@sgi.com>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Reply-To: Rob Warnock <rpw3@sgi.com>
- Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc., Mountain View, CA
-
-
- In article <8371@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- writes:
-
- | Mike Riddle <Mike.Riddle@f27.n285.z1.fidonet.org> writes:
-
- | > My understanding is that a 9600 bps modem actually operates at 2400 baud,
- | > with 4 levels, creating a 9600 bps signal...
-
- | I don't have the reference in front of my and can't give a detailed
- | explanation of PEP (Packetized Ensemble Protocol), but it is somewhat
- | more complex than that. PEP (I don't know anything at all about the
- | theory of v.32) tries for as many as 512 separate carriers (each
- | operating very slowly) over the line...
-
- Excerpts (scraps, really, the original is almost 300 lines) from a
- document posted to comp.dcom.modems 6 Mar 90 by Mike Ballard & Cerifin
- Castillo of Telebit (write to <modems@telebit.uucp> for more info):
-
- Telebit Corporation Revision 1.01 01 DECEMBER 1989
- A BRIEF TECHNICAL OVERVIEW OF TELEBIT MODEMS
- ...
- This technique (DAMQAM) divides the voice bandwidth into 511
- individual channels each capable of passing 2, 4, or 6 bits per
- baud based on the measured characteristics of the individual
- frequencies associated with each channel. On a typical phone
- connection, the modem uses a subset of about 400 of those channels.
-
- Each time the modem connects to a circuit established on the dialup
- Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN), the TELEBIT modem
- measures the quality of the connection, and determines the usable
- subset of the 511 carriers. The aggregate sum of bits modulated
- on this subset of carriers multiplied times the baud rate yields
- a bit per second rate that on a local telephone connection
- (i.e. round trip through your local telco) is 18031 bps. This
- 18031 bps is then reduced by about 20% to allow for the CRC overhead,
- to about 14400 bps of data throughput.
- ...
- The modem operates at 7.35 and 88.26 baud, transparently changing
- baud rates to accomodate the pace and quantity of data traffic.
- When in "interactive mode" the modem sends data using 11 msec
- packets (which run at 88.26 baud). Each packet contains 15 bytes
- of data. In "file transfer mode" the modem uses 136 msec packets
- (that transfer at 7.35 baud) that contain 256 bytes of data.
- The TrailBlazer decides which packet size to use on an ongoing
- dynamic basis. No intervention from the user is required.
-
- So the rate never exceeds 88.26 baud. Your local telco ought to be able to
- do *that* at least... ;-} ;-}
-
-
- Rob Warnock, MS-9U/510 rpw3@sgi.com rpw3@pei.com
- Silicon Graphics, Inc. (415)335-1673 Protocol Engines, Inc.
- 2011 N. Shoreline Blvd.
- Mountain View, CA 94039-7311
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Don Alvarez <boomer@athena.princeton.edu>
- Subject: Re: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development
- Date: 29 May 90 15:42:19 GMT
- Reply-To: Don Alvarez <boomer@athena.princeton.edu>
- Organization: Princeton University
-
-
- In article <8372@accuvax.nwu.edu> gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore) writes:
-
- >So far nobody is claiming that the privacy of IS 54's digital cellular
- >system is really great, just that it's slightly better than analog
- >cellular. What burns me is that they could have made it *really
- >great* with relatively trivial spec and software changes (encryption)
- >but didn't bother. (Yes, the changes are "relatively" trivial if you
- >examine the protocol they are running here.)
-
- I have no idea what protocol they are running, but I do know that
- creating a system that allows for secure and trusted communications
- between large numbers of remote devices is never trivial.
-
- Providing *encrypted* communications is trivial (rec.funny readers use
- rot-13 "encryption" all the time, for example) , but providing
- *secure* and *trusted* communications is. Secure communications mean
- that only the sender and the intended recipient can read (or in this
- case listen to) the communication. Trusted communications add caveats
- that one can detect interuption of service, replay or delay of
- messages, etc.
-
- The important point for a cellular phone link is that encrypted does
- not mean secure. If you and I wanted to exchange encrypted mail over
- the internet, we'd have to first agree on and somehow exchange our
- encryption key without anyone else discovering it for it to be secure.
- The same is true for cellular phones, only there the key exchange has
- to be automatic and transparent to the user.
-
- How do your phone and my phone agree upon and exchange an encryption
- key without allowing eavesdroppers to pick up the key? We can't just
- use public key encryption techniques, because of the following
- senario:
-
- A wants to call B. A says "I need B's public key". C hears
- the request, and quickly replies "B's public key is foo".
- C then says "I need B's public key," and waits for B to reply
- "My public key is bar." A now tries to talk to B. A encrypts
- the communication using foo, and sends it out. C decrypts it
- (since C knows how to decrypt foo), copies it, and reencrypts it
- using bar (which only B knows how to decrypt). B recieves it,
- decrypts it, and says "I just got a message from A which was
- encrypted in a way that no one else can decrypt, so it is secure."
- Likewise, C can catch B request for A's public key and listen
- to the return half of the call.
-
- Somehow, your phone and my phone need to already share a unique key
- with each other inorder to exchange the key they will use in their
- communications. That is a chicken and egg problem. The solution,
- clearly is to have a secure "directory server", which shares a
- different unique key with every phone in the system. This is a
- reasonably tractable solution (the number of keys grows only with N,
- each phone needs only a single key, and distribution of that key can
- be done when the phone is manufactured), and forms the basis of MIT's
- Kerberos system for secure and trusted logins to Unix boxes. (<-
-
- Actually, Kerberos uses secret key encryption rather than public key
- encryption, because the security of the method is unaffected and a
- careful accounting of messages reveals that more packets need to be
- exchanged to start up a conversation using public key than is needed
- to start up one using secret key). The problem is that the directory
- server is now a tremendous single point of failure. Anyone who cracks
- any directory server anywhere instantly renders the entire security
- algorythm null and void. Worse, *every phone* would have to be sent
- back to the manufacturer to get a new secret key burned in (otherwise
- there would be no way to trust that the new key was not intercepted if
- it was reprogrammed remotely).
-
- That would be prohibitively expensive, so it would never happen. But
- we all know that somewhere out there is a nasty who would manage to
- crack into one of these servers (you've got to admit they'd be real
- attractive nuisances). Now you have a system that everyone believes
- is secure, but actually provides little or no more real security than
- current cellular phones.
-
- In short, providing secure and trusted communications over a "hostile"
- network is not trivial, and in my opinion providing a false sense of
- security about ones communications is worse than providing no
- security.
-
-
- don alvarez
- Princeton Univ. Physics Dept.
- (609) 924-3039
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Patrick L. Reilly" <motcid!reilly@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: BAD Digital Cellular Standard Under Development
- Date: 29 May 90 17:32:04 GMT
- Reply-To: motcid!reillyp@uunet.uu.net
- Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Div., Arlington Hgts, IL
-
-
- If you want to compare the various upcoming cellular developments,
- look up "What's Ahead Worldwide for Digital Cellular", by A. Slekys,
- in the May, 1990 issue of Mobile Radio Technology.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dan Johnson <acd4!dwj@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter"
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 17:24:24 EST
-
-
- In Volume 10, Issue 391, Message 5 of 12 roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
- writes:
-
- > Sounds like the Cat Detector Van from the Ministry of Housing!
-
- There are two things that I would like to point out about this.
- First, the Cat Detector Van was actually from the Ministry of Housinge
- (it was spelled that way on the van). Second, the UK really does have
- TV detector vans which are used to find people using TV sets without a
- license. This earned a passing mention in RISKS DIGEST 9.94 (the
- licenses, not the vans).
-
-
- Daniel W. Johnson Applied Computing Devices, Inc.
- UUCP: ...!uunet!acd4!dwj Earth: 39 25 02 N / 87 19 55 W (approx.)
- ARPA: acd4!dwj@uunet.uu.net Compu$erve: 71520,367
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jon Baker <asuvax!gtephx!mothra!bakerj@ncar.ucar.edu>
- Subject: Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter"
- Date: 29 May 90 23:49:44 GMT
- Organization: gte
-
-
- In article <8341@accuvax.nwu.edu>, roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
- writes:
-
- > A few (ten?) years ago, Hackensack Water Company installed an
- > automated meter reading gizmo on my parents' water meter (and a new
- > meter, equipped for said gizmo). There is a cable running from the
- > meter to a plastic box around 6" x 9" x 2" (about big enough to be a
- > late 1970's line-powered 1200 bps modem, I guess) and some quad cable
- > from there to Tip/Ring on the phone entrance block. Anybody know
- > exactly how this works? Either it is programmed to place a local call
- > in the middle of the night to some data-collection number, or maybe
- > HWCo has permission from NJBell to run some sort of data-over-voice
- > carrier on top of their wires? Anybody know for sure?
-
- The utility runs a special trunk to the CO. The trunk is siezed, and
- the utility's equipment sends tones to the CO indicating which
- subscriber line it wishes to connect to. The CO pulls a path from the
- utility's special trunk to the subscriber's line. Note - the line is
- not rung; a path is just built. The utility sends some tones to the
- 'box' at the customer's premise, activating it and requesting the
- current reading. The box sends some tones back indicating the current
- reading. If the subscriber goes off-hook, or if a call is placed to
- the subscriber, while this is going on, the connection is immediately
- aborted. Pretty nifty, huh?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dan Lance <mailrus!citi!gatech!ukma!corpane!drl@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: 10XXX Bugs
- Date: 29 May 90 14:58:47 GMT
- Reply-To: Dan Lance <mailrus!citi!gatech!ukma!corpane!drl@uunet.uu.net>
- Organization: Corpane Industries, Inc.
-
-
- In article <8143@accuvax.nwu.edu> contact!djcl@uunet.uu.net (woody)
- writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 377, Message 7 of 7
-
- >During a recent trip to Buffalo, I made the following observations:
-
- >1) Dialing 10XXX + 1 700 555.4141 generally didn't work too well.
- > For instance, 10333 (Sprint) or 10222 (MCI) + 1 700 555.4141 got
- > AT&T's long distance network recording. 10555 (Telesphere) just
- > got a fast busy signal.
-
- >2) You can't dial 10222 + 1 800 888.1800, which is supposed to be one
- > of MCI's numbers! (Presumably, 1 + 800 888.1800 should do it).
- > Of course, mixing and matching various 10XXX on 800 number calls
- > would only get the recording that the number could not be dialed
- > with the selected carrier.
-
- >3) At least the 10555 0# worked to get a Telesphere operator...
-
- I recently made a trip to Eau Claire, Wisconsin, where I tried to make
- a call from a Wisconsin Bell payphone which was clearly labeled "The
- long distance carrier for inter-LATA calls from this phone is (very
- large type) AT&T". Wrong!
-
- Dialing 1 502 244 xxxx (ka-bong) followed by my AT&T card number
- produced a recording: "MCI is unable to process your card number.
- Please enter a valid card number."
-
- After a moment's pause, I tried 10288 1 502 244 xxxx (ka-bong)
- card-number, which got me "Thank you for using AT&T" and a completed
- call.
-
- I don't have an account with MCI, and my AT&T card is a student card,
- which is not associated with any specific phone number. I assume from
- previous messages to the Digest that if I had a normal AT&T card (one
- associated with my home phone number) MCI would have completed my call
- and billed me for it.
-
- I'm interested in how common this type of sleazy diversion is, and how
- Wisconsin Bell can get away with claiming that calls are routed by
- default through AT&T when in fact they go through MCI. Can my calls
- get routed through another long distance carrier when I use 10288? If
- MCI had completed my call, would I have been liable for the charges?
-
-
- Dan Lance / Corpane Industries, Inc. / Louisville, KY / drl@corpane.uucp
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 9:13:05 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Re: Correction to 908 Areacode Exchange List
-
-
- I have indeed seen 841 Stroudsburg in other lists for the
- (pre-908-split) 201 area. Yes, it's the name of a town across the
- river, and this situation happens the other way around with Belvidere
- (475 prefix in what will become area 908). Just across the Delaware
- River is, if I recall correctly, 215-498 also using the place name
- Belvidere. (215-area prefix list available in the Philadelphia
- directory.)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: Correction to 908 Areacode Exchange List
- Date: 29 May 90 09:22:44 EDT (Tue)
- From: Tom Lowe <tel@cdsdb1.att.com>
-
-
- S M Krieger <smk@attunix.att.com> writes:
-
- >> Please add the following to your lists.
-
- >> 841 STROUDSBG NJ
-
- > Unless the Delaware River shifted in the last three days, I thought
- > Stroudsburg was in PA.
-
- I thought the same thing, but what you see above is exactly what
- should appears on your phone bill if you call 908-841-XXXX (or 201-841
- for now) There is also a STROUDSBG PA in the list:
-
- 717-223 STROUDSBG PA 717-420 STROUDSBG PA
- 717-421 STROUDSBG PA 717-424 STROUDSBG PA
- 717-476 STROUDSBG PA 717-620 STROUDSBG PA
- 717-629 STROUDSBG PA
-
- > Also, the following little tidbits of information appeared in a phone
- > bill insert:
-
- > 4. We will still be able to use 7 digits for all local calls
- > (which in the case of my Summit, NJ central office, means
- > that calls to Millburn, Madison, and South Orange will
- > remain at 7 digits).
-
- > What I am curious about though is how many central office
- > codes will this tie up in both 201 and 908?
-
- I read in an article in a newspaper a couple days ago that we will
- have to use area codes for all calls outside our area code, including
- local, after the statewide 911 system goes into effect (sometime in
- 1992, if I remember correctly). Anyone know why this is the case?
-
-
- Tom Lowe
- tel@cdsdb1.ATT.COM
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
- Subject: Re: Customized Telephone Numbers
- Reply-To: amanda@mermaid.intercon.com (Amanda Walker)
- Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation, Herndon, VA
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 17:53:53 GMT
-
-
- In article <8328@accuvax.nwu.edu>, wb8foz@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (David
- Lesher) writes:
-
- > C+P is a lower life form, IMHO.
-
- Indeed. If air time was a little cheaper, I'd drop my C&P home phone
- completely and just use my cell phone. They really make a person
- appreciate the value of competition in the marketplace...
-
- No independent telcos around Reston that I've found, though :-(.
-
-
- Amanda Walker
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #395
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa08034;
- 30 May 90 5:49 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa13289;
- 30 May 90 3:56 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab00712;
- 30 May 90 2:53 CDT
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 2:06:07 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #396
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005300206.ab22946@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 30 May 90 02:05:48 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 396
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Data Access Lines [Chip Rosenthal]
- Re: A Request For Technical Info on Telecom [Chip Rosenthal]
- Re: Connection of a British Phone Outside Britain [Dave Horsfall]
- Re: FCC REN Numbers [Todd Inch]
- Re: My List of World Wide Codes [Jim Breen]
- Re: My List of North American Area Codes [Mark Brader]
- Re: My List of North American Area Codes [Colin Plumb]
- AT&T Finally Learns USA Country Code [Jim Rees]
- Why Texas Air Uses So Much Phone Service [Will Martin]
- Communications Publishing Service [Bill Berbenich]
- AT&T Billing Alert [Jeremy Grodberg]
- TDD Cost and Technology Issues [Michael C. Berch]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Chip Rosenthal <chip@chinacat.unicom.com>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
- Date: 29 May 90 05:07:40 GMT
- Organization: Unicom Systems Development, Austin, TX
-
-
- John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com> writes:
-
- >Chip Rosenthal <chip@chinacat.unicom.com> writes:
- >> dBm is commonly used to specify a level referenced to a "digital milliwatt"
- >> signal. This is a 1004Hz sine wave of 1mW power into 600ohms.
-
- >What was it before digital technology? I've always heard it referred
- >to as simply the "milliwatt".
-
- Of course, you are correct. dBm is power relative to a milliwatt. I
- slipped into that thinking because the bench work I've always done was
- with digital equipment.
-
- >Also, to be technically pure, dBm can be a reference to one milliwatt
- >into any impedance, as long as it's a milliwatt.
-
- Right. The 600ohms is a common impedance, and would be the required
- termination if you were to feed the digital milliwatt pattern into,
- say a CODEC, and want to really get a milliwatt of power delivered.
-
- >And it is still 0 dBm.
-
- I stand, if not corrected, then at least clarified and unconfused :-)
-
-
- Chip Rosenthal
- chip@chinacat.Unicom.COM
- Unicom Systems Development, 512-482-8260
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Chip Rosenthal <chip@chinacat.unicom.com>
- Subject: Re: A Request For Technical Info on Telecom
- Date: 29 May 90 05:15:08 GMT
- Organization: Unicom Systems Development, Austin, TX
-
-
- leugers@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu (Mary J. Leugers) writes:
-
- >The class is aimed at graduate students in communications who have no
- >experience in the engineering realm.
-
- A most readable book is the |Understanding Telephone Electronics| book
- by Fike and Friend of the T.I. Learning Center. It's available
- through Radio Shack, SAMs, the Telecom Library, and gadzillions of
- other places. The Telecom Library's telno is 1-800-LIBRARY. All
- folks reading this group/list should have a copy of their catalog
- (right next to their Hello Direct catalog :-).
-
-
- Chip Rosenthal
- chip@chinacat.Unicom.COM
- Unicom Systems Development, 512-482-8260
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Dave Horsfall <dave@stcns3.stc.oz.au>
- Subject: Re: Connection of a British Phone Outside Britain
- Date: 29 May 90 04:08:08 GMT
- Reply-To: Dave Horsfall <dave@stcns3.stc.oz.au>
- Organization: Alcatel STC Australia, North Sydney, AUSTRALIA
-
-
- In article <7743@accuvax.nwu.edu>, julian@bongo.uucp (Julian Macassey)
- writes:
-
- | I believe that Aussie phones work the same way.
-
- | British Telecom Auxiliary Jack Wiring
-
- | British phones have three wires. There are two wires A & B (Tip &
- | Ring) coming into a house. There is no protector. In the primary jack
- | in the house is a 2 uF capacitor. On the end of this cap is the third
- | wire. The AC ringing signal is fed to the phone on this wire and its
- | DC counterpart.
-
- Australian phones are similar, but not quite the same. My memory is
- getting hazy, but this is what I recall:
-
- The pair from the exchange appear on pins 2 and 6 of a (comparatively)
- enormous 4-pronged device (2 conductors per prong, with a keyed
- dummy).
-
- The blocking capacitor is installed in the "first" telephone in the
- system, with the extensions being wired in series/parallel with three
- conductors (bells in series via pin 3, transceivers in parallel) and
- the capacitors are bypassed on the extensions. Typically, the "first"
- handset has its plug screwed into the jack, so it cannot be removed.
- In these days of electronic ringers, the point is moot.
-
- You could always tell when someone (illegally) wired their phones;
- they either tinkled when somebody dialled (mis-wired), or they didn't
- ring when the main phone did (bell disconnected to stop the Telecom
- Thought Police from investigating a sudden change in REN...).
- Nowadays, the demarcation point is the first telephone jack in the
- premises (if a household) or the termination panel (if
- business/flats), and you can plug in what you like after that (but
- must still be approved).
-
- Other pins had various uses: 1 & 5 were typically used for modems, etc
- (2 & 6 went to modem, phone went to 1 & 5 from modem), and I believe
- pins 3 & 4 were remote bells. There were many configurations.
-
-
- Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU) Alcatel STC Australia dave@stcns3.stc.oz.AU
- dave%stcns3.stc.oz.AU@uunet.UU.NET ...munnari!stcns3.stc.oz.AU!dave
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN Numbers
- Reply-To: Todd Inch <gtisqr!toddi@nsr.bioeng.washington.edu>
- Organization: Global Tech Int'l Inc.
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 14:02:22 GMT
-
-
- Note: I attempted to post the below on May 22 but must have fouled up.
- Since then, I've read numerous responses. Hopefully, this is a little
- less technical. Watts = Volts * Amps, so if Volts is constant, you
- can substitute "Amps" in my analogy below, if that is any help.
-
- Somebody mentioned the phone company should be supplying roughly 5
- Watts of ring juice, so maybe my analogy was more technically correct
- that I had intended. :-)
-
- To clear up possible confusion about the effect of the on/off switch:
- On many phones, especially ones with mechanical bells, this will not
- effect the REN at all - it still draws just as much current. On some,
- it may draw a little less current and have a lower effective REN than
- the FCC sticker shows. On very few phones, this may disconnect the
- entire ringer circuit from the line and therefore change the REN to
- 0.0.
-
- On all phones with mechanical bells that I've seen, (insert non-expert
- disclaimer here) simply disconnecting the bell inside (with wire
- cutters, screwdriver, or a do-it-yourself switch) would have the
- effect of drawing no ringing current, thus 0.0 REN.
-
- My favorite method of adding a bell switch to a mechanical bell phone
- is to wire the bell to an unused line wire (black or yellow) and then
- add one of those cheap hanging-lamp style cord switches to the line
- cord. This avoids having to drill holes in the phone, etc. If you
- did this to all the phones in your house, you could turn on/off all
- the bells at the phone by your bed.
-
- (Write me for details, it's really to boring and elementary for most
- readers.)
-
- My original non-posted article:
-
- Stephen J. Friedl, a 3B2-kind-of-guy, asks about REN's and what good
- they are.
-
- I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I've always thought
- of it as if Ringer Equivalence Numbers were like Watts, that is, the
- electrical power required for and drawn by the bell/ringer/chime/etc
- during ringing.
-
- For example, if you have a power supply which will safely supply five
- watts, you can add any combination of loads which total no more than
- five watts.
-
- Each household appliance, for example, is rated X watts on its
- nameplate and consumes approximately that much. Add the watts of the
- appliances on a circuit to find the total and check if the circuit can
- safely supply that much.
-
- It's possible to build an appliance (ringer) to consume fewer watts by
- having a more efficient design or by providing less output (noise.)
-
- Most physical bells are designed to use 1.0 REN's because that's the
- way they've been for years and it's an acceptable standard which is
- fairly cost-effective to achive.
-
- Most "chirpy" ringers use less because they are electronic and
- peizo-electric (more efficient and, IMHO, more annoying) rather than
- electromechanical like the standard gong-style bells. Or, some of
- them on "powered" phones use amplifiers which cause some of the watts
- come from the AC power supply instead of the phone line.
-
- The Phone Company's (Central Office) Switch or a PBX, or whatever is
- driving the bells, shouldn't "care" how much you're using as long as
- you're under the maximum rated "load" - more load will just draw more
- current.
-
- Of course, as you approach the maximum load or surpass it, there will
- be significant voltage drops and/or current increases (Ohm's law)
- which will result in not enough voltage to ring all ringers and/or
- activating a "circuit-breaker" or equivalent overcurrent protection
- circuit in the switch or pbx.
-
- I've always heard that the "standard" switch or pbx will power about five
- REN's worth of ringer-load, but I've had six or seven hooked up before.
- I've also noticed the performance of the bells degrade as you add too
- many, due to low voltage.
-
- If the REN's are smaller per phone, or on the average, then you can
- add more phones. So, you should pay attention if you are approaching
- five or more REN's on one line, but this isn't a problem for most
- people.
-
- I've never seen a bell with greather than 1.0 REN, except maybe some
- oddities I build myself, which the FCC never tested. :-)
-
- A side note: Due to inexpensive construction, most cheap electronic
- phones with non-gong ringers (the J-Mart $8 models) will ring at lower
- voltages than they really should and often chirp when someone pulse
- dials on an extension phone (called bell-tap). They usually also have
- less than 1.0 REN's, but these are two effects from one cause (cheap
- but efficient all-electronic circuitry) rather than a cause and effect
- of each other.
-
-
- Todd Inch, System Manager, Global Technology,
- Mukilteo WA (206) 742-9111 UUCP: {smart-host}!gtisqr!toddi
- ARPA: gtisqr!toddi@beaver.cs.washington.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jim Breen <rdt139z@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>
- Subject: Re: My List of World Wide Codes
- Organization: Chisholm Institute of Technology, Melb., Australia
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 23:09:12 GMT
-
- [ lots of country codes deleted ]
- > 974- Qatar 976- Mongolia
- > 977- Nepal 98- Iran
-
- > [Moderator's Note: The above are always prefaced with either 011 (for
- ******
- > direct dialing) or 01 (for credit card, collect or third number
- > billing). Then a city code, comparable to a USA area code, follows the
- > above in most cases, prior to the actual local number. Countries not
- > listed above are not dialable; calls for those points are made through
- > the operator. PT]
-
- Patrick, Patrick! PLEASE remember that your group is read all over the
- world. Your comment above is true for callers in the USA, and
- practically nowhere else. International access codes differ from
- country to country. For example, in Australia we have 0011 for
- ordinary IDD, 0012 for IDD with ring-back prices, 0015 for IDD with
- echo disabled, etc. etc.
-
-
- _______ Jim Breen (rdt139z@monu6.cc.monash.oz) Dept of Robotics &
- /o\----\\ \O Digital Technology. Chisholm Inst. of Technology
- /RDT\ /|\ \/| -:O____/ PO Box 197 Caulfield East VIC 3145 Australia
- O-----O _/_\ /\ /\ (ph) +61 3 573 2552 (fax) +61 3 573 2748
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Mark Brader <msb@sq.com>
- Subject: Re: My List of North American Area Codes
- Reply-To: msb@sq.uucp
- Date: Tue, 29 May 1990 03:07:33 -0400
-
-
- I like that! The correct title of the posting would have been "My
- List of *Other* North American Area Codes". The list skips 416. The
- article was posted from tmsoft, in Toronto, in area code 416.
-
-
- Mark Brader, utzoo!sq!msb, msb@sq.com C unions never strike!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: colin_plumb <contact!colin@uunet.uu.net>
- Date: Tue May 29 11:53:27 1990
- Subject: Re: My List of North American Area Codes
- Organization: Contact Public Unix BBS. Toronto, Canada.
-
-
- I just came back from England, and noticed that one of the country
- codes they listed in their phone book was 1 809 (they even put the
- space in). How many countries have no country code but "1"?
-
-
- Colin
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: rees@dabo.ifs.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
- Subject: AT&T Finally Learns USA Country Code
- Reply-To: rees@citi.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
- Organization: University of Michigan IFS Project
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 16:46:59 GMT
-
-
- I live in the USA. Sometimes when I'm bored I like to call the
- operator and ask, "What is the country code for the USA?" (An amusing
- variation on this is to ask for the country code for Canada.) I've
- been doing this for years and never got the right answer. Usually I
- get shuttled to various supervisors for about ten minutes, and the
- final answer is almost always, "There is no country code for the USA."
-
- Today, for the first time, I got the correct answer from an AT&T
- operator. She put me on hold for about five minutes then came back
- with it. I'll be trying MCI and Sprint operators tonight.
-
- By the way, the USA country code still isn't given in any USA
- telephone directory I've ever seen. Burkino Faso? OK. Vanuato? No
- problem. USA? Forget it!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 11:02:56 CDT
- From: Will Martin <wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil>
- Subject: Why Texas Air Uses So Much Phone Service
-
-
- "Texas Air" is the holding company that owns not only the airline by
- that name, but also New York Air, Continental, and TWA. (Those
- include the lines that were taken over by this group, and no longer
- have separate identities, like Ozark.) Also, Northwest merged its
- reservations system into TWA's, so all those airlines' phone usage is
- merged under the "Texas Air" entry.
-
- (Source: newspaper articles in the {St. Louis Post-Dispatch} on Carl
- Icahn and what fate is in store for TWA [which has its hub here in St.
- Louis and thus is of much local interest].)
-
-
- Regards, Will
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 13:15:26 EDT
- From: Bill Berbenich <bill@shannon>
- Subject: Communications Publishing Service
-
-
- Does anyone have the address and phone number for 'Communications
- Publishing Service?' They put out various books of a telecom nature
- and I'd like to get in contact with them. Please e-mail directly to
- me, no use in cluttering the list up.
-
-
- Thanks,
-
- Bill Berbenich internet: bill@eedsp.gatech.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 15:57:22 PDT
- From: Jeremy Grodberg <jgro@apldbio.com>
- Subject: AT&T Billing Alert
-
-
- In case you haven't heard, as of July 1, AT&T will begin billing
- for *all* long distance directory assitance calls. Currently, they
- let customers make one free long distance DA call a month.
-
-
- Jeremy Grodberg
- jgro@apldbio.com "Beware: free advice is often overpriced!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Michael C. Berch" <mcb@presto.ig.com>
- Subject: TDD Cost and Technology Issues
- Date: 29 May 90 06:59:07 GMT
- Organization: IntelliGenetics, Inc., Mountain View, Calif. USA
-
-
- Thanks to Ken Harrenstien and others who pointed out the rationale
- behind call discounts for TDD users (i.e, that the limited bandwidth
- of TDD calls requires that TDD users must make much longer calls
- compared to voice users for the same amount of information exchanged).
- This makes sense.
-
- The obvious next question is, is there any hope in sight for changing
- the TDD standard to something more, uh, *modern* than 45.5 or 48 baud
- (this is Baudot code, right, not ASCII?)? I understand that no
- teletype-like exchange can realistically be expected to approach the
- information content of a voice conversation, but are deaf people going
- to be stuck with 45.5 baud forever? I can't imagine that given
- today's miniaturization of components and automated manufacturing
- techniques, a device can't be built that will communicate at least 2
- orders of magnitude faster at an order of magnitude less cost than
- TDDs of the 1970s...
-
- Is anybody working on this, from the standards side, or the technology
- side?
-
-
- Michael C. Berch
- mcb@presto.ig.com / uunet!presto.ig.com!mcb / ames!bionet!mcb
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #396
- ******************************
- Received: from [129.105.5.103] by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa20971;
- 30 May 90 23:49 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa06660;
- 30 May 90 22:04 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa13452;
- 30 May 90 21:00 CDT
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 20:02:59 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #397
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005302003.ac04701@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 30 May 90 20:02:36 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 397
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- "Legion of Doom" Indictment [Eduardo Krell]
- Online Access to Library Card Catalog [Jon Zeeff]
- Modem Connections While Camping [J. Philip Miller]
- Defeating 800 ANI & Caller*ID Using the "O" Operator [Steve L. Rhoades]
- MCI PrimeTime, Call Pacific, Call Europe, Call Canada [Jeremy Grodberg]
- Municipal Taxation of Interstate Long Distance Phone Charges [S. Forrette]
- AT&TMail, MCI, or IBM IN Global Mail? [Joe Jesson]
- PacBell Dropping Charge for Touch-Tone Service [Christopher J. Pikus]
- Another Clue to Possible E. German Prefixes [J. Stephen Reed]
- Ship to Shore Ripoff? [Carl Moore]
- Panasonic VA-616 Cards/Phones [Owen Scott Medd]
- New Double-jack Wall Plates, Crosstalk? [Peter da Silva]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: ekrell@ulysses.att.com
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 12:42:21 EDT
- Subject: "Legion of Doom" Indictment
-
-
- Computer Consultant Could get 32 Years If Convicted of Source-Code Theft
-
- Baltimore - A Middletown, Md., man faces as many as 32 years in prison
- and nearly $1 million in fines if convicted of being involved in the
- "Legion of Doom" nationwide group of Unix computer buffs now facing
- the wrath of federal investigators.
-
- The U.S. Attorney's Office here on May 15 announced the indictment of
- Leonard Rose, 31, a computer consultant also known as "Terminus," on
- charges that he stole Unix source code from AT&T and distributed two
- "Trojan Horse" programs designed to allow for unauthorized access to
- computer systems. Incidents occurred between May, 1988 and January,
- 1990, according to the indictment.
-
- The five-count indictment, handed down by a federal grand jury,
- charges Rose with violations of interstate transportation laws and the
- federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Rose faces as many as 32 years
- in prison, plus a maximum fine of $950,000.
-
- He is the third person to be indicted who was accused of being
- connected with the so-called Legion of Doom. Robert J. Riggs, a
- 21-year-old DeVry Institute student from Decantur, Ga., and Craig M.
- Neidorf, 19, a University of Missouri student from Columbia, Mo., also
- have been indicted.
-
- Rose's indictment stemmed from a federal investigation that began in
- Chicago and led investigators to Missouri and Maryland, assistant U.S.
- Attorney David King said. While executing a search warrant in
- Missouri, investigators uncovered evidence Rose was transporting
- stolen Unix 3.2 source code, King said. Investigators then obtained a
- warrant to search Rose's computer system and found the stolen source
- code, King added.
-
- He said the Trojan Horse programs were substitutes for a legitimate
- sign-in or log-in program, with a separate shell for collecting user
- log-ins or passwords.
-
- "Whoever substituted [the Trojan Horse program] could get passwords to
- use the system any way he or she wanted to," King said.
-
- The indictment was a result of a long-term investigation by the U.S.
- Secret Service, and was issued one week after federal authorities
- raided computer systems at 27 sites across the United States.
- Investigators seized 23,000 computer disks from suspects accused of
- being responsible for more than $50 million in thefts and damages. The
- Secret Service at that time announced that five people have been
- arrested in February in connection with the investigation.
-
- King said he was unaware if Rose indictment was related to the raids
- made earlier this month.
-
- "We don't just go out and investigate people because we want to throw
- them in jail. We investigate them because they commit an offense. The
- grand jury was satisfied," King said.
-
- The U.S. Attorney's Office said the investigation revealed individuals
- had accessed computers belonging to federal research centers, schools
- and private businesses. King would not name any of the victims
- involved.
-
- Rose was associated with the Legion of Doom and operated his own
- computer system known as Netsys, according to the indictment. His
- electronic mailing address was Netsys!len, the document said.
-
- The Legion, according to the indictment, gained fraudulent,
- unauthorized access to computer systems for the purpose of stealing
- software; stole proprietary source code and other information;
- disseminated information about gaining illegal access, and made
- telephone calls at the expense of other people.
-
-
- Eduardo Krell AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
-
- UUCP: {att,decvax,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell Internet: ekrell@ulysses.att.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jon Zeeff <zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us>
- Subject: Online Access to Library Card Catalog
- Organization: Branch Technology
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 18:40:35 GMT
-
-
- In the "for what it's worth" department, the U of Michigan's card
- catalog is available online (for free). You can call (313) 764-4800
- (2400 bps) or telnet to hermes.merit.edu. Enter "MIRLYN" as the Which
- Host? prompt and follow the directions. It can be quite helpful when
- you are searching for a book (by keyword, author or title).
-
-
- Jon Zeeff (NIC handle JZ) zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "J. Philip Miller" <phil@wubios.wustl.edu>
- Subject: Modem Connections While Camping
- Organization: Division of Biostatistics, Washington Univ., St. Louis, MO
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 16:50:29 GMT
-
-
- I am getting ready to take a trip west and will be camping for much of
- the time. Since I normally never leave home without a computer, I
- have been contemplating how I can get my regular fix of
- comp.dcom.telecom while I am gone.
-
- I have the usual assortment of modular phone cords with alligator
- clips and gizmoes to replace the mouthpiece of a standard phone, but
- think that these are unlikely to work from the pay phones which are
- usually about the best you can find in a campground.
-
- I suppose that I could get a cellular phone, but I have not kept up
- with the modem technology for use with cellular's.
-
- Suggestions?
-
-
- J. Philip Miller, Professor, Division of Biostatistics, Box 8067
- Washington University Medical School, St. Louis MO 63110
- phil@wubios.WUstl.edu - Internet (314) 362-3617
- uunet!wuarchive!wubios!phil-UUCP (314) 362-2693(FAX) C90562JM@WUVMD - bitnet
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sat, 26 May 90 14:17:02 PDT
- From: "Steve L. Rhoades" <slr@dhw68k.cts.com>
- Subject: Defeating 800 ANI & Caller*ID Using the "O" Operator
-
-
- When calling an 800 number from my Pasadena, CA exchange (818-794 -
- 1AESS), I have found that I can prevent the called party from
- receiving my number simply by routing the call through the "O"
- operator (Pac*Bell's TOPS).
-
- Normally, when I call one of MCI's, SPRINT's or AT&T's 800 numbers, my
- number will show up on the called party's call detail. If I simply
- Dial "O", and "have trouble reaching 800-xxx-xxxx" the call detail
- doesn't have my number. (Yes, the TOPS operator does have it.) I've
- only tried this with the above-mentioned 800 providers.
-
- My question: Is this just a fluke ? Is there some type of convention
- for TOPS to pass the calling number to the 800 service provider ? Has
- anyone else tried this ? Does it work elsewhere ?
-
- On a related question: For those of you with Caller*ID, what happens
- when you get a call routed through the "O" operator ? (the called
- party being someone that you would normally get a calling number from
- on your Caller*ID display).
-
-
- Steve
-
- Internet: slr@riot.caltech.edu UUCP:....elroy!cit-vax!riot!slr
- US MAIL: P.O. Box 1000, Mt. Wilson, Ca. 91023 VOICE:(818) 794-6004
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 28 May 90 18:16:42 PDT
- From: Jeremy Grodberg <jgro@apldbio.com>
- Subject: MCI PrimeTime, Call Pacific, Call Europe, Call Canada
-
-
- Here's the latest on MCI's discount calling plans:
-
- MCI PrimeTime (for calls inside the US): $8.75 per month includes one
- hour of calling. Additional minutes are billed at $6.50/hr (about 11
- cents/min). Plan hours are M-F 5pm to 8am, all day Sat and Sun
- *except* Sun 5pm-11pm. Subscribers also get a 10% discount on calls
- made during non-plan hours. In California, MCI California PrimeTime
- covers in-state calls. PrimeTime may not cover in-state calls for
- subscribers in other states: check before ordering.
-
- MCI Call Europe (for calls to Western Europe): $3.00 per month plus 59
- cents per minute, M-F 3pm-8am, all day Sat and Sun.
-
- MCI Call Pacific (for calls to Pacific Rim): $3.00 per month plus 79
- cents per minute, M-F 10pm-2pm, all day Sat and Sun.
-
- MCI Call Canada (for calls to Canada): $3.00 per month plus 19 cents
- per minute, M-F 5pm-8am, all day Sat and Sun.
-
- Note that the $3.00/month subscriber fees do not include any calling
- time, and you have to pay a separate fee for each plan you subscribe
- to.
-
- Call MCI at 1 800 955 1624 for verification and for further details.
-
- Please note: I am not affiliated with MCI, and this information is
- provided second hand as a service to TELECOM Digest readers. I make
- no promises as to the accuracy of this information, and disclaim all
- warranties. Check the rates with MCI before ordering. My Employer
- wishes I weren't doing this, so please don't even ask them about it.
-
-
- Jeremy Grodberg
- jgro@apldbio.com "Beware: free advice is often overpriced!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 29 May 90 17:11:15 -0700
- From: Steve Forrette <forrette@cory.berkeley.edu>
- Subject: Municipal Taxation of Interstate Long Distance Phone Charges
-
-
- A couple of days ago someone who lives in Berkeley mentioned that
- their US Sprint bill had charges for the City of Berkeley tax applied
- to all calls, not just intra-state ones. I checked into this a bit,
- and finally tracked someone down in the Berkeley city offices that had
- some background. She read me part of an article that appeared in the
- San Francisco Chronicle on January 11, 1989, which stated:
-
- "The U.S. Supreme Court has cleared the way for local governments to
- tax inter-state phone calls."
-
- Maybe this is old news to most of you, but not to me. Anyway, I guess
- we'll just have to live with this one...
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: joe jesson <jej@chinet.chi.il.us>
- Subject: AT&TMail, MCI, or IBM IN Global Mail????
- Reply-To: joe jesson <jej@chinet.chi.il.us>
- Organization: Chinet - Chicago Public Access UNIX
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 02:15:10 GMT
-
-
- Would like to tie a large company-wide network to a large gateway
- for PROFS to Telex, FAX, Internet, etc. and would like to select
- either AT&TMail, IBM IN, UUNET, or SoftSwitch (own a small switch).
-
- Rumors have it that AT&TMail is *expensive* and uses a Bisync (what?)
- link and Internet is *only* for research. Maybe IBM IN the best???
-
- Give me your thoughts!!
-
-
- joe
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Christopher J. Pikus" <cjp%megatek.UUCP@ucsd.edu>
- Subject: PacBell Dropping Charge for Touch-Tone Service
- Date: 30 May 90 08:31:50 GMT
- Organization: Megatek Corporation, San Diego, Ca.
-
-
- It was only a few weeks ago we were discussing the "Cost
- versus price" of Touch tone service. I believe we generally agreed
- that while touch tone service cost practically nothing, the RBOCs
- charged for this "premium" feature based upon perceived value (one of
- them marketing terms :-)).
-
- Today in my phone bill was a little leaflet saying that they
- will be eliminating the charge for touch tone. The actual text is as
- follows:
-
- "--Most residential customers have Touch-Tone Service
- and pay $1.20 per month for it. The connection charge
- is $3. Those charges will be eliminated under the CPUC
- order, and all residential customer will receive Touch-
- Tone automatically. ....."
-
- "... Also we are proposing that business customers re-
- ceive Touch-Tone Service as part of their basic service.
- ...."
-
- I believe the CPUC document describing this is: "CPUC Decision
- D.89-10-031".
-
- Now I'm waiting for Pac Bell to charge a premium for using the pulse
- dialing "feature". :-)
-
-
- Regards,
-
- Christopher J. Pikus, Megatek Corp.
- INTERNET: cjp@megatek.uucp San Diego, CA
- UUCP: ...!uunet!megatek!cjp
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 18:29 EST
- From: "J. Stephen Reed" <0002909785@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Another Clue to Possible E. German Prefixes
-
-
- Some messages about a week ago dealt with Salomon Brothers opening an
- office in East Germany, but with a telephone number that was prefixed
- for a West German cellular exchange. The original msg asked whether a
- contingency plan with as-yet-unused prefixes was being put into effect
- for East Germany, pending the reunification.
-
- I may have a clue as to how they are thinking, from parallel facts in
- the postal world.
-
- West German postal codes are normally four digits, ranging from 1000
- (West Berlin) to 7999. An article in the Germany Philatelic Society
- magazine noted that according to a Deutsche Bundespost bulletin some
- years ago, the 8000s and 9000s are reserved for "other German
- regions". The editor of the magazine investigated further and found
- that those numbers were, in fact, being held primarily for East
- Germany. Or, as they called it in the 50s and 60s, "die sogenannte
- DDR" ("the so-called 'German Democratic Republic'").
-
- (Digression: Note the word "primarily" in the last paragraph. It
- seems obvious that not all Federal Republic bureaucrats have given up
- on getting back the territories now held by Poland, as Chancellor Kohl
- now has given up, albeit under pressure.)
-
- Since the Bundespost is the same PTT that controls the phone system, I
- would be surprised if some codes for exchanges haven't been set aside
- as well. I seriously doubt that both country codes would persist
- (unlike the two Yemens, or Tanzania).
-
-
- Steve Reed * Liberty Network, Ltd. * P.O. Box 11296 * Chicago, IL 60611
- 0002909785@mcimail.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 10:39:26 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Ship to Shore Ripoff?
-
-
- In the news (and not just locally Philadelphia etc.) this week was a
- cruise ship which got stuck on a sand bar off Cumberland County, NJ in
- the Delaware Bay. After the passengers were evacuated, word came from
- them (reaching me via KYW news-radio in Phila.) that it wasn't all one
- big happy pary on board.
-
- Among the things they were irate about was being charged $15 a minute to
- call anxious relatives. Also, a line formed at the single phone available.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Owen Scott Medd <osm@ox.com>
- Subject: Panasonic VA-616 Cards/Phones
- Organization: Ocwen Trading, Inc.
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 23:11:46 GMT
-
-
- We're the proud (?) owners of a Panasonic VA-616 KSU. Our local
- distributer has informed us that he can no longer obtain line cards or
- phones for the thing.
-
- [ I know I'm going to regret this. ]
-
- I'm soliciting information that will lead to establishing contact with
- establishments who have parts for this Panasonic KSU. I'd be happy to
- summarize the information I get if anyone else cares.
-
- Thanks,
-
- Owen
-
- USMail: Ocwen Trading, Inc., 101 N. Main, Suite 410, Ann Arbor, MI 48104
- Phone: +1 313 930-1888 FAX: +1 313 930-6636
- UUCP: <backbone>!umich!leebai!osm
- Internet: osm@ox.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
- Subject: New Double-jack Wall Plates, Crosstalk?
- Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
- Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 16:29:19 GMT
-
-
- We just had new phone service hooked up, two lines: one for data, the
- other for voice. Instead of designating one jack for data and hooking
- up the rest for voice, my wife let them install a new kind of
- wallplate with two lines at each point:
-
-
- +-------------+
- | |
- | +--+ +--+ |
- | | | | | |
- | +--+ +--+ |
- | |
- +-------------+
-
- I presume they have hooked red-green up on one line, and yellow-black
- on the other. I haven't had time to check it or even pop a plate
- (moving is *such* fun), but if they did this I should expect some
- crosstalk. Has anyone else seen this setup? If there is a crosstalk
- problem, what should I do?
-
-
- `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.ferranti.com>
- 'U` Have you hugged your wolf today? <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>
- @FIN Dirty words: Zhghnyyl erphefvir vayvar shapgvbaf.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #397
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa21625;
- 31 May 90 0:07 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab06660;
- 30 May 90 22:06 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ab13452;
- 30 May 90 21:00 CDT
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 20:50:30 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #398
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005302050.ab12012@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 30 May 90 20:50:13 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 398
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter" [Peter Weiss]
- Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter" [James Blocker]
- Re: 10XXX Bugs [John Higdon]
- Re: Panel (ugh!) Switches [Don H. Kemp]
- Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole? [Joel B. Levin]
- Re: Why Texas Air Uses So Much Phone Service [Jeffrey Silber]
- Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call [David Tamkin]
- Re: FCC REN Numbers [David Tamkin]
- Re: Irish Phone Service [David Tocher]
- Re: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons [Clayton Cramer]
- Re: AT&T Finally Learns USA Country Code [Guy Middleton]
- Use of Area Code 202 [Carl Moore]
- Caller-ID Theory and Operation [Sameer Siddiqui]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Organization: Penn State University
- Date: Wednesday, 30 May 1990 06:46:49 EDT
- From: Peter Weiss <PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu>
- Subject: Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter"
-
-
- In article <8397@accuvax.nwu.edu>, asuvax!gtephx!mothra!bakerj@
- ncar.ucar.edu (Jon Baker) says:
-
- >In article <8341@accuvax.nwu.edu>, roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
- >writes:
-
- >The utility runs a special trunk to the CO. The trunk is siezed, and
- >the utility's equipment sends tones to the CO indicating which
- >subscriber line it wishes to connect to.
-
- Does this mean they only install this stuff at dwellings that have
- telephone circuits installed? Are there any implications on what kind
- of circuits? What happens if a data call is in progress? If measured
- service, who foots the cost of the call? Is there an implied theft of
- (telephone) service from the subscriber's point of view? What does
- the FCC & PUC think of all this? If this is saving the utility money,
- will it be reflected back into the rates?
-
- I guess these are rhetorical questions since I don't really want to
- start a flame war.
-
-
- /Pete
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 17:37:21 CDT
- From: James Blocker <blocker%rebel.@sun.com>
- Subject: Re: Boston Gas "Specially-equipped Gas Meter"
-
-
- In message <8329@accuvax.nwu.edu> (Volume 10, Issue 390, Message 6 of 7),
- henry@garp.mit.edu (Henry Mensch) writes:
-
- [form letter from gas company describing new remotely read meters deleted]
-
- >Now, aside from not including very many details of this new system
- >(does it continuously broadcast use? If not, then how does it know to
- >broadcast? how is the signal encoded? ...), one wonders what gives
- >boston gas company the idea that I want them to install a radio
- >transmitter in my home.
-
- This sounds very much like a system that I saw a presentation on
- sometime in the mid-70's. I don't remember a lot of the details, but
- this should answer at least some of your questions.
-
- This particular remote meter reading system had two antennas, a
- varactor (frequency) tripler, and some circuitry to fetch the current
- meter reading (be it cu. ft. of gas, gallons of water, kwh, or
- whatever).
-
- The system worked by having a van drive down an alley or street
- transmitting a continuous carrier on a given frequency (say 450 MHz).
- This RF energy was received through the first antenna (your receiving
- antenna) and tripled up to your transmitting frequency (say 1350 MHz)
- by the varactor tripler. The associated meter reading circuitry
- sensed the presence of RF (I believe it was even powered by the
- received RF energy) and modulated the transmitter with your meter
- information by keying the output of the tripler on and off at a
- certain bit rate. A serial number and checksum was also included as
- part of this transmission to guard against false readings.
-
- The van then would have a receiver operating at three times its
- transmitting frequency, demodulate your transmission and feed that
- into a computer (possibly through a serial port) for storage of the
- meter reading.
-
- What I thought was so slick about this system was that it was mostly
- passive from the customer's (your) standpoint. No external power was
- required, since it was powered off of received RF and it did not
- transmit unless a carrier of the proper frequency and adequate
- strength was in the vicinity.
-
- Unfortunately, I am very hazy on the details as far as the actual
- frequencies involved and the data format. After your new "remote
- reading" meter is installed, I'd be interested in hearing what it
- actually looks like and if it is close to the system I have described.
-
-
- Jim Blocker (KF5IW)
- Currently working at, but not representing, Rockwell International
- ..!texbell!texsun!digi!fozzy!phoenix!blocker
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: 10XXX Bugs
- Date: 30 May 90 02:48:05 PDT (Wed)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- Dan Lance <mailrus!citi!gatech!ukma!corpane!drl@uunet.uu.net> writes:
-
- > I'm interested in how common this type of sleazy diversion is, and how
- > Wisconsin Bell can get away with claiming that calls are routed by
- > default through AT&T when in fact they go through MCI. Can my calls
- > get routed through another long distance carrier when I use 10288?
-
- It was probably just an error on someone's part that the wrong default
- carrier appeared on the card. The owner or operator of the property
- where the phone was located could have requested some change and not
- updated the card, or Wisconsin Bell could have made a mistake in
- placing the card or programming the default. Probably nothing sinister
- here.
-
- If the phone in question is an LEC pay phone, then 10288 should get
- you AT&T. If the phone is a COCOT, then anything goes. More than
- likely in that event, your call would just be blocked.
-
- > If MCI had completed my call, would I have been liable for the charges?
-
- Of course. If you mistakenly buy a ticket on United instead of USAir
- and fly to LA, you will still have to pay your Amex when the bill
- comes. When it comes to long distance, it is Caveat Emptor. It is up
- to you to learn how to tell if your call is being handled by the
- carrier of your choice. Now if you could prove fraud...
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Don H Kemp <uvm-gen!teletech!dhk@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Panel (ugh!) Switches
- Date: 30 May 90 12:29:50 GMT
-
-
- From article <8250@accuvax.nwu.edu>, by john@bovine.ati.com (John Higdon):
-
- > Jack Winslade <Jack.Winslade@f666.n285.z1.fidonet.org> writes:
-
- >> I've been fascinated with the panel switches (Ma Bell's answer to Rube
- >> Goldberg) ever since seeing an aging one in action back in 1971 or so.
-
- > Panel was almost universal in San Francisco and Oakland up until the
- > early 70's. Obviously, exchanges added in the '50s onward were
- > crossbar and later, ESS, but there was a substantial penetration of
- > these impressive machines. Having grown up in Oakland, I'll never
- > forget the sound of the phone.
-
- Ah yes, panel! In 1965 (or so) I worked in San Francisco's Market CO,
- where we had the best of all worlds. At that time there were (as I
- recall) two panel offices, two #1 crossbar, and one #5 crossbar. The
- panel offices took up more than twice the time that the three others
- took. I can still recall having to poke around finding a stuck rod to
- release it. Once in a while an entire bank would drop at once. The
- crash seemed to shake the entire floor.
-
-
- Don H Kemp
- B B & K Associates, Inc.
- Rutland, VT
- uunet!uvm-gen!teletech!dhk
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Joel B Levin <levin@bbn.com>
- Subject: Re: How Do You Tell Someone About a Security Hole?
- Date: 30 May 90 13:25:45 GMT
- Reply-To: Joel B Levin <levin@bbn.com>
- Organization: BBN Communications Corporation
-
-
- In article <8344@accuvax.nwu.edu> claris!netcom!ergo@ames.arc.nasa.gov
- (Isaac Rabinovitch) writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 391, Message 7 of 12
-
- |Our anonymous might well have been "trespassing" (though Lippman
- |ignores the legal responsibility of the "offended" party in this sort
- |of property rights issue)....
-
- An interesting legal theory (which I don't understand very well and
- which may only apply to some other area of law) is called something
- like "attractive nuisance" -- if the owner of a property leaves a
- ladder up to his second story window and a kid climbing it to break in
- falls and injures himself, the owner may be liable for damages even
- though the injured party was committing a criminal act. (I don't know
- whether that somehow excuses the criminal act.)
-
- Could it be the employer who leaves a system sitting around with
- security holes waiting to be entered shares some guilt or is at least
- liable for some damages for injuries to the employee which result from
- his being fired? Far out speculation; I'm sure the lawyers hereabouts
- will flatten this idea fast.
-
-
- /JBL
-
- Nets: levin@bbn.com or {...}!bbn!levin POTS: (617)873-3463
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Jeffrey Silber <silber@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu>
- Subject: Re: Why Texas Air Uses So Much Phone Service
- Date: 30 May 90 14:50:45 GMT
- Reply-To: Jeffrey Silber <silber@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu>
- Organization: Cornell Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca NY
-
-
- In article <8410@accuvax.nwu.edu> wmartin@stl-06sima.army.mil (Will
- Martin) writes:
-
- >"Texas Air" is the holding company that owns not only the airline by
- >that name, but also New York Air, Continental, and TWA.
-
- Texas Air does not, to the best of my knowledge, own TWA. They do,
- however, own Eastern. Carl Icahn led the buyout (and partly owns)
- TWA.
-
-
- Jeffrey A. Silber/silber@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu
- Business Manager/Cornell Center for Theory
- & Simulation in Science & Engineering
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 16:21 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: I Want to Dial the Area Code Even on a Local Call
-
-
- David Leibold wrote in volume 10, issue 391:
-
- |I found a report of someone in 416 being able to dial 416 + local number
- |and getting the local number (no 1+ in front, though). This was after
- |the cutover in March to allow for NXX prefixes.
-
- Hmm. Was that on a call that normally requires 1-416-NXX-XXXX or on
- one that normally requires dialing seven digits?
-
- Central Telephone, through some overlooked bit of code, allows
- customers in 312 to dial anywhere in area code 815, inter-LATA or
- intra-LATA, with ten digits. [A large part of area code 815 is in the
- Chicago LATA. If the ten-digit call is to a prefix outside the
- Chicago LATA, Centel passes the call to the dialer's primary long-
- distance carrier.] That won't work for calls to area code 708 (which
- is nearer than 815) or to other places in 312, though.
-
- Centel customer service personnel have, in the last couple weeks,
- become very familiar with the two bugs in their billing software that
- have been hitting me since the 312/708 split (well, one of them was
- cured March 12). My mentions of them have been greeted with "oh yes"
- as I start to describe the problems instead of "really?" after I've
- finished. The programmers are working on a fix, they tell me. I'll
- believe it when the fix is working on my bills.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 16:25 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: FCC REN Numbers
-
-
- Todd Inch wrote in volume 10, issue 396:
-
- :I've always heard that the "standard" switch or pbx will power about five
- :REN's worth of ringer-load, but I've had six or seven hooked up before.
-
- Aha. So that must be the reason I can connect 5.9 REN's of telephones
- plus .8 REN's of modems and answering machines and still get blasted
- out of bed if I don't turn the ringers off! Thank you, Mr. Inch. I
- wish your article had made it through the first time.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: tocherd@ul.ie (DAVID TOCHER X2293, ROOM B3039)
- Subject: Re: Irish Phone Service
- Date: 30 May 90 10:49:50 GMT
- Organization: University of Limerick, Ireland
-
-
- The reason the dialling codes from Ireland to the UK are not in the
- usual international form is easily explained. The north of Ireland is
- part of Ireland ( articles 2 and 3 of the Constitution) and hence it
- was not acceptable to dial Belfast with an international dialling
- code. As Belfast is part of British Telecom network all the Ireland to
- UK codes are affected.
-
-
- David Tocher EI2AMB Dept of Mathematics,
- University of Limerick, Ireland.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Clayton Cramer <optilink!cramer@uunet.uu.net>
- Subject: Re: Last Laugh! A Phone Without the ( and ) Buttons
- Date: 30 May 90 21:58:14 GMT
- Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
-
-
- In article <8351@accuvax.nwu.edu>, craig@gendep.info.com (Craig
- Dickson) writes:
-
- # If you think you get dummies on a switchboard, then you
- # have no idea what people will do with ATM's.
- .....
-
- # After taking a few seconds to recover from her surprise, she said, as
- # calmly as possible, "Does the fact that the building is missing two
- # walls and the roof suggest anything to you?"
-
- I've got one almost as good. My wife was working as a teller for
- Santa Monica Bank in the early 1980s, when ATMs were still a bit of a
- novelty. One day, a guy with a very pronounced New York City accent
- walked in and informed them -- rather loudly and angrily -- "Hey!
- Your coffee machine don't work!" and stalked out.
-
- It took them several minutes to figure out that he was attempting to
- purchase coffee from the ATM.
-
-
- Clayton E. Cramer {pyramid,pixar,tekbspa}!optilink!cramer
- Disclaimer? You must be kidding! No company would hold opinions like mine!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Guy Middleton <gamiddleton@watmath.waterloo.edu>
- Subject: Re: AT&T Finally Learns USA Country Code
- Organization: University of Waterloo Math Faculty Computing Facility
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 21:51:33 GMT
-
-
- In article <8409@accuvax.nwu.edu> rees@citi.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
- writes:
-
- > I live in the USA. Sometimes when I'm bored I like to call the
- > operator and ask, "What is the country code for the USA?" (An amusing
- > variation on this is to ask for the country code for Canada.) I've
- > been doing this for years and never got the right answer. Usually I
- > get shuttled to various supervisors for about ten minutes, and the
- > final answer is almost always, "There is no country code for the USA."
-
- Strictly speaking, isn't it true that neither the USA nor Canada have
- country codes? Both countries are in Zone 1, I believe, and there is
- nothing else in Zone 1, so there is no real confusion. All the
- country codes seem to be at least two digits long, so if codes are
- ever assigned, they could be 10 and 11.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 17:16:55 EDT
- From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
- Subject: Use of Area Code 202
-
-
- Case in point for area code 202 being used in the suburbs: I see a
- contractor's name and address in Arlington, with phone given as
- 703-xxx-xxxx, where the prefix is indeed Arlington, not Washington.
- Then it says "FTS installations, dial 202-xxx-xxxx." What impact does
- the prefix shortage (and the upcoming requirement to dial area code on
- local calls crossing NPA border in Washington DC area) have on this?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 16:44:41 EDT
- From: Sameer Siddiqui <ssid@mtuxo.att.com>
- Subject: Caller-ID Theory and Operation
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
-
-
- Hi folks,
-
- I am interested in learning more about the Caller-ID service offered by
- the RBOCs esp. NJ Bell. Some of the questions I have are:
-
- - Is it a propriatary service/product?
- - Is it available or going to be available nationwide?
- - Is it part of ISDN service?
- - Do you need the decoder/display box or can you get a PC to do the work?
-
- etc etc etc.
-
- Any source of information would be welcome.
-
- Thank you all.
-
-
- Sameer Siddiqui
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #398
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa23317;
- 31 May 90 0:59 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa06982;
- 30 May 90 23:10 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id ac06660;
- 30 May 90 22:07 CDT
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 21:45:28 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #399
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005302145.ab22073@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 30 May 90 21:44:32 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 399
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: Mobile Data Terminals [Rob Gutierrez]
- Re: Data Access Lines [David Tamkin]
- Re: TDD Long Distance Discount [Tad Cook]
- Re: TDD Long Distance Discount [John Higdon]
- Re: TDD Cost and Technology Issues [Roy Smith]
- TDD's and Faster Speeds [Joseph C. Pistritto]
- Sprint Service: Business / Non-Business [Steve Elias]
- Special Issue: UK Telephone System [TELECOM Moderator]
- InfoText Magazine (Was: 900-based Legal Services) [Wayne Correia]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: Rob Gutierrez <gutierre@calvin.arc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: Mobile Data Terminals
- Date: 31 May 90 01:25:49 GMT
- Reply-To: Rob Gutierrez <gutierre@calvin.arc.nasa.gov>
- Organization: NASA Science Internet - Network Operations Center
-
-
- mdivax1!theriaul@van-bc.wimsey.bc.ca writes:
-
- > I have noticed some discussion here recently about mobile data
- > technology (terminals in police cars - is it for real?) and can assure
- > telecom readers that indeed this technology is here - the company I
- > work for, Mobile Data International (MDI), designs and manufactures
- > complete mobile data communications systems.
-
- > This is not that new, just check out the October, 1982 issue of
- > National Geographic for a photo of the Vancouver Police Department's
- > MDT.....
-
- I have seen, and have been aware of MDT's being used by police
- departments since 1973!
-
- Not too many people seem to remember the first big installation of
- MDT's was at the Oakland (California) Police Dept in 1973. It used
- GTE "Datacom's", which were huge terminals, and used a real CRT
- (Cathode Ray Tube) to display four lines of twenty-five characters. A
- roomate of mine was able to procure the "Users Manual" to operate and
- also look up codes for the messages displayed on the CRT. These were
- used also with a CAD (Computer Aided Dispatching) system, which GTE
- was pushing as an "all-in-one solution to the rising crime rate", and
- Oakland was very much appropriate for that quote. The system was
- funded by a government grant to see how MDT's would work in the real
- world.
-
- The terminals were not initially well received because the police
- officers thought this was an excuse for the City of Oakland to reduce
- staffing in the cars from two-man to one-man, and then have that one
- man actually look away from the "suspect" while doing the queries on
- the MDT. (First Commanment in Police Academy: Thou Shalt NEVER Looketh
- Away From Thy Suspect, EVER!).
-
- The grant money eventually ran out about three or four years later,
- and the MDT's were eventually scrapped (they did keep the remaining
- ones working as long as possible, cannabalizing the others to do so).
-
- The police officers did accept the terminals when they discovered it
- was actually faster than waiting in line for subject and auto queries
- on the radio. (Yes, you were given a number on the query channel (Ch.
- 3) during busy times, like Friday/Saturday nights! Sometimes waiting
- behind up to six to eight other officers!). They were sorely missed
- when the query radio channel crowded up again.
-
-
- Robert Gutierrez
- Office of Space Science and Applications,
- NASA Science Internet Project - Network Operations Center.
- Moffett Feild, California.
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: The Chicago PD was using these terminals on a
- limited basis in the middle '70's, and they have not really increased
- their usage now, fifteen years later. Still, only a few cars are
- equipped. Calling on the radio for information frequently results in a
- long delay here, and worse yet are the times when the dispatcher
- responds saying the system is down, and to try again in twenty
- minutes. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 16:35 EST
- From: David Tamkin <0004261818@mcimail.com>
- Subject: Re: Data Access Lines
-
-
- Mike Riddle wrote in volume 10, issue 391:
-
- |Jeremy [Grodberg] wants to use a Telebit 9600 bps modem, and his version
- |of Ma Bell said that only < 2400 {actually, <= 2400 --DWT} was guaranteed
- |on a voice line.
-
- |My understanding is that a 9600 bps modem actually operates at 2400 baud
- |with four levels, creating a 9600 bps signal. This method was used
- |precisely because of the inherent bandwidth of a "normal" voice line. It
- |seems to me that whoever told him 9600 wouldn't work on a "normal" line
- |either didn't understand 9600 bps methodology or was trying to sell up.
-
- John Higdon commented in volume 10, issue 394:
-
- :1200 and 2400 bps modems don't operate at 1200 and 2400 baud
- :respectively, but rather at a slower baud rate and carry four or eight
- :bits per baud. This is accomplished by introducing a phase (and in the
- :case of 2400, amplitude) component.
-
- 1200 bps and 2400 bps modems operate at 600 baud with two or four bits
- of information in every baud.
-
- In volume 10, issue 395, Rob Warnock quoted an official description of
- PEP and observed:
-
- +So the rate never exceeds 88.26 baud. Your local telco ought to be able
- +to do *that* at least.
-
- And I think that's the problem: Jeremy's telco promises that ordinary
- lines will support 600 baud (regardless of bps counts attained through
- artifice or cunning) but not the 2400 baud possibly required for 9600
- bps. {I won't venture a guess whether he needs 2400 baud modulation
- for 9600 bps as Mike said or only 88.26 baud as Rob quoted.} The reps
- are told that voice lines can handle 2400 bps (the presumed speed
- limit for 600 baud) but reliability at [the higher baud rates possibly
- needed for] higher data rates requires premium service.
-
- If PEP is modulated only at 7.35 or 88.26 baud, it should be no
- difficulty for the local lines to carry it, unless shoving so many
- bits into so few bauds requires so many carrier pitches that local
- telco lines might not be reliably able to discriminate that fine.
-
-
- David Tamkin P. O. Box 7002 Des Plaines IL 60018-7002 +1 708 518 6769
- MCI Mail: 426-1818 CIS: 73720,1570 GEnie: D.W.TAMKIN +1 312 693 0591
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Tad Cook <ssc!tad@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
- Subject: Re: TDD Long Distance Discount
- Date: 30 May 90 06:03:45 GMT
- Organization: very little
-
-
- In article <8374@accuvax.nwu.edu>, gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore) writes:
-
- > Not only do deaf people burn up more time on the lines than the
- > average subscriber, but they get charged less for it? Why don't they
- > get surcharged instead, like BBS systems in some places?
-
- Because the idea is to try to DECREASE the isolation of deaf folks,
- not increase it! Besides, a really SMART network should be able to
- handle LOTS of 45 baud TDD calls over the same bandwidth as one voice
- call.
-
- > Besides the general public being ripped off to pay the phone bills of
- > the deaf, there is also the topic of TDD design itself. Years ago, a
-
- RIPPED OFF??? Yeah, "screw all the deaf folks ... let the 'free
- market determine their fate!"
-
- > few companies made combination TDD's with 300-baud modems as well as
- > Weitbrecht modems built in. Most deaf people didn't buy them. That's
- > why they are now stuck with 45 baud modems -- they didn't buy faster
- > ones when they were offerred. Nowadays you could get 1200 or 2400 for
- > the same price (it's all in one chip) but still they buy 45's.
-
- This is bullshit. Most of the TDDs today have both 45 baud Baudot and
- 300 baud ASCII. From a practical standpoint, most people don't type
- faster than 45 baud (60 WPM) anyway.
-
- > I already object to their forcing me to subsidize deaf people as a
- > class, but if I chose myself to subsidize any deaf people, I'd at
- > least give them a decent modem, or a fax machine, not this trash.
-
- You are just plain selfish. These people are incredibly isolated, and
- now that a little bit is FINALLY being done to help, YOU CAN"T STAND
- IT!
-
- > Oh yeah, while I'm ranting about bills, [various rants about the
- > California Relay Service, a "free" service that lets deaf people TDD
- > to the service which reads their message to hearing people and vice
- > verse. By "free" I mean "you and I pay for it, not its users".]
-
- > Why isn't there a free relay service for email users to send to and
- > receive from fax machines? I mean, we are at a severe disadvantage
- > when *everybody* has a fax machine except us! Or howabout a
-
- Go buy a fax machine then! Don't bellyache about the deaf!
-
- > Personally I think helping people should be voluntary. I don't like
- > the kind of "help" the government gives.
-
- Well, I have been doing voluntary work to help hearing impaired folks
- for quite some time now, and the volunteer efforts alone haven't cut
- it! If you object to the rest of us getting the government involved,
- what have YOU been doing to help??
-
-
- Tad Cook Seattle, WA Packet: KT7H @ N7HFZ.WA.USA.NA Phone: 206/527-4089
- MCI Mail: 3288544 Telex: 6503288544 MCI UW
- USENET:...uw-beaver!sumax!amc-gw!ssc!tad or, tad@ssc.UUCP
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Organization: Green Hills and Cows
- Reply-To: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
- Subject: Re: TDD Long Distance Discount
- Date: 30 May 90 04:01:56 PDT (Wed)
- From: John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
-
-
- John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com> writes:
-
- > Besides the general public being ripped off to pay the phone bills of
- > the deaf, there is also the topic of TDD design itself.
-
- Then there's the Lifeline business. Remember the original concept? In
- our modern society, the theory went, those with less than normal means
- still needed the security of a telephone, particularly the elderly. So
- that these people could afford a telephone, a special low rate
- (subsidized by all of the rest of us, and now even billed as a
- "lifeline surcharge") was created with a very small local calling
- allowance. Well, that seemed slightly reasonable: the phone was really
- necessary for emergencies and this subsidized rate would make it
- available for those who couldn't otherwise afford it.
-
- Then someone pointed out that those with lifeline service were also
- too poor to go anywhere or do anything and passed the hours talking on
- the phone. Since the cost could go through the roof with the limited
- measured service, the guilt squad decreed that lifeline should also be
- unmeasured. Done [said the king with a stroke].
-
- My question is why stop there? How about free flat-rate long distance?
- How about free 976 (and just bill the providers as if they had
- recieved a pay call, but of course they don't get paid)?
-
- > And a voice-to-explanations service for the stupid?
-
- I love it! But it would have to be paid for with a surcharge on people
- with IQs over 70.
-
- > Personally I think helping people should be voluntary. I don't like
- > the kind of "help" the government gives.
-
- Unfortunately, utilities are a favorite target for the "assistance
- afficiandos". You know, give away the first few cubic feet, kilowatts,
- etc., then charge like hell for any amount over that. It's called
- "social manipulation pricing". The telephone, being just a bit
- different, requires a different contortion of rates. It has to have a
- special rate available only to the target beneficiaries, and a
- surcharge is collected from everyone else.
-
- Frankly, I think it's unfair that I have to pay so much for my
- telephone lines. Why can't I get ten lines at lifeline rates? Then my
- money could go for things I REALLY want.
-
-
- John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395
- john@bovine.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
- Subject: Re: TDD Cost and Technology Issues
- Organization: Public Health Research Institute, New York City
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 12:25:06 GMT
-
-
- In <8413@accuvax.nwu.edu> mcb@presto.ig.com (Michael C. Berch) writes:
-
- > I understand that no teletype-like exchange can realistically be expected
- > to approach the information content of a voice conversation, but are deaf
- > people going to be stuck with 45.5 baud forever?
-
- Why limit TDD to teletype-like exchange? Since we're talking
- about wholesale replacing of an existing standard with a better one,
- why not go whole hog and do it right? Even something as simple as a
- tele-etch-a-sketch would be a great help at communications, and should
- be able to easily fit into a 9600 bps data circuit (which we all know
- can be crammed onto a regular voice line using V.32, PEP, or similar
- technology).
-
- I could imagine something like a 12" x 12" digitizing tablet
- with stylus (or a mouse) for sending simple drawings and a 512 x 512 x
- 1 bitmap screen for showing what is being drawn. Such a device built
- today shouldn't cost any more than a Teletype(tm) did 20 years ago,
- and in fact probably a lot less, consisdering that what I've described
- is basically a Mac Plus which is rumored to have a manufacturing cost
- of just a few hundred dollars. Of course, such a device would have to
- be downward compatable with the old baudot machines since we can't
- expect everyone to switch overnight.
-
- In fact, such a device would be useful for voice conversations
- too (anybody who has seen John Maden do his "magic crayon"
- play-by-play knows what I mean), but it would actually be easier to
- multiplex the keyboard and stylus/mouse data streams (since they are
- both already digital) than it would be to multiplex voice and
- stylus/mouse.
-
-
- Roy Smith, Public Health Research Institute
- 455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016
- roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu -OR- {att,cmcl2,rutgers,hombre}!phri!roy
- "Arcane? Did you say arcane? It wouldn't be Unix if it wasn't arcane!"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: TDD's and Faster Speeds
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 15:18:31 MESZ
- From: "Joseph C. Pistritto" <jcp@cgch.uucp>
-
- A significant problem for upgrading TDD's is the installed base. I
- bet there's a lot of these out there, so any new device would have to
- speak 45 baud as well as 300 or 1200 or 2400 or whatever. Now
- actually, this is more of a problem than you think. Most baud rate
- generator/modem chips don't support baud rates below 110 any more, and
- if they do the only choice is usually 75, (used for lots of newswire
- services, maybe even still for Telex). Also, this is a 5 bit code if
- I remember correctly, and lots of chips don't support 5 bits any more
- either. This would probably complicate the design by several more
- chips than would otherwise be needed, raising the price. I don't know
- what the average income level of a deaf person is, but I bet it would
- take a while for this idea to gain acceptance. Although I'd think the
- the ability to use online services like Compuserve and BIX would be
- work something to at least a reasonable number.
-
-
- Joseph C. Pistritto (cgch!bpistr@chx400.switch.ch, jcp@brl.mil)
- Ciba Geigy AG, R1241.1.01, Postfach CH4002, Basel, Switzerland
- Tel: +41 61 697 6155 (work) +41 61 692 1728 (home) GMT+2hrs!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Sprint Service: Business / Non-Business
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 20:17:15 -0400
- From: Steve Elias <eli@pws.bull.com>
-
-
- I think that anyone can sign up for a Sprint business account. Just
- think of a fun name for your business, and away you go.
-
- This gives you the advantage of lower prices via Sprint's volume
- discounts, a plethora of cross referenced billing information, more
- informative "news bulletins", and the option of having an 800 number
- installed for $10 per month. Some of these features may be available
- on residential accounts by now...
-
-
- /eli
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 21:00:12 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Subject: Special Issue: UK Telephone System
-
-
- Clive Feather has graciously sent along a lengthy essay describing in
- detail the workings of the telephone network in the UK. I will be
- sending this out as a special issue over the weekend, probably on
- Saturday.
-
-
- PT
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Wayne Correia <wdc@apple.com>
- Subject: InfoText Magazine (Was: 900-based Legal Services)
- Date: 31 May 90 01:40:13 GMT
- Organization: Dev. Tech. Support, Apple Computer Inc, Cupertino, CA.
-
-
- >The magazine has a 900 number permitting people who want to subscribe
- >to this controlled-circulation (free for first 12 months) magazine to
- >do so for a one time $9.95 charge (gotcha). Sorry folks, I just do
- >not remember that number.
-
- The 900 number for a subscription to InfoText Magazine is 900
- INFO-TEXt. Remember that it costs $9.95 for the call.
-
- Of course, if you're cheap, you might try to just FAX them a request
- for a free subscription at 714-493-3018. Don't tell them I sent you.
-
- Wayne
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #399
- ******************************
- Received: from delta.eecs.nwu.edu by mintaka.lcs.mit.edu id aa27703;
- 31 May 90 2:48 EDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa30319;
- 31 May 90 1:15 CDT
- Received: from mailinglists.eecs.nwu.edu by delta.eecs.nwu.edu id aa04153;
- 31 May 90 0:11 CDT
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 23:09:23 CDT
- From: TELECOM Moderator <telecom@eecs.nwu.edu>
- [To]: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Subject: TELECOM Digest V10 #400
- BCC:
- Message-ID: <9005302309.ab24439@delta.eecs.nwu.edu>
-
-
- TELECOM Digest Wed, 30 May 90 23:09:09 CDT Volume 10 : Issue 400
-
- Inside This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: My List of World Wide Codes [John R. Covert]
- Re: My List of World Wide Codes [Peter J. Dotzauer]
- Re: My List of World Wide Codes [Steve Pershing]
- Re: My List of North American Area Codes [Douglas Scott Reuben]
- Re: TDD Long Distance Discount [Fred E.J. Linton]
- Ohio Bell vrs. Cincinnati Bell [Douglas Scott Reuben]
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 06:18:49 PDT
- From: "John R. Covert 30-May-1990 0816" <covert@covert.enet.dec.com>
- Subject: Re: My List of World Wide Codes
-
-
- Michael's list was actually not quite as correct or complete as the
- official list based on the CCITT Blue Book which I posted in V10#85
- back in February. But since it is substantially complete, I'll not
- post that again, and will limit myself to a few comments:
-
- 259, though assigned to Zanzibar, is not in use. Zanzibar is reached
- via Tanzania, 255, with city code 54. This gives us a hint about what
- is likely to happen with Yemen. Since Aden was not diallable from any
- known western country, but Yemen was, it is likely that the expansion
- of service into the united country will use the Yemen code, but it is
- unlikely that the combined country will give up the extra code,
- keeping it reserved for future use. Though we don't know what will
- happen with Germany, there is the possibilty that Germany will make
- the East German codes diallable as West German codes by prefixing them
- with "3" ("30" is currently the only "3" code in use in West Germany,
- and is used for Berlin). But this does not mean that Germany will
- give up 37.
-
- Michael lists 269 as Mayotte. Now we get into how politics affects
- the assignment of country codes. Mayotte is an island in a group of
- islands known as the Comoros Islands. In 1975, the Comoros
- unilaterally declared independence from France and formed the Federal
- Islamic Republic of the Comoros. The island of Mayotte voted to
- remain part of France, an action which is not recognized by the
- Comoros, nor by the United Nations, which tends to look askance at
- colonialism, even when the residents indicate that they want to remain
- part of a first world country. Thus the CCITT Blue Book lists the
- code as assigned to the Comoros, though, in fact, it is only usable to
- reach Mayotte, since the rest of the Comoros have not made any
- telephonic progress since separating from France. (Another example of
- politics affecting the assignment of country codes is the fact that
- the CCITT does not list the fact that most countries use "886" to
- reach Taiwan. When Taiwan first became diallable, it was dialled
- using "86", since it was the U.N. member at the time. It lost the
- code as part of being replaced in the U.N. with PRC representatives.
- The PRC has informed the CCITT that "866" has been assigned to Taiwan,
- but I would not expect anyone to use that instead of "886".)
-
- Continuing with far-flung parts of France, Michael lists 590 as
- Guadeloupe, but 596 as "French Antilles" which is not really correct.
- The French Antilles consist of the two French Departments of
- Guadeloupe and Martinique. Unlike Mayotte, which is a territory,
- these two departments are as much a part of France as any other
- department in metropolitan France. 590 is Guadeloupe, which includes
- the French side of St. Martin, the island of St. Barthelemy, the
- islande of Marie-Galante, and Guadeloupe itself. 596 is just
- Martinique. There is still six digit dialing between 590 and 596,
- though the correct code must be dialled from outside. BTW, dialling
- metropolitan France from these islands is not done by dialling the
- international access code "19" and then "33", since the French
- dialling pattern uses that sequence followed by another country code
- to indicate that you want the French overseas operator for that
- country. Instead, you dial as within France: just "16" and the number
- (with the leading "1" for the Paris region).
-
- 670 is listed as "Mariana Islands" but is in fact the "Northern
- Mariana Islands" including the principal island of Saipan.
-
- Michael's list does not include two assignments that I suspect may not
- be used for a while, if ever. San Marino, though still diallable with
- the Italian country code 39 and city code 541 has been assigned its
- own code: 295. And Trinidad and Tobago has been assigned 296,
- although the manager of their network planning department has told me
- that they have no plans to leave the North American Numbering Plan
- area code 809 -- they just asked for the code and got it.
-
- And finally, though not confirmed, Bhutan has reportedly been assigned
- the code 975. A backwards country from both a transportation and
- communications standpoint, it is not likely to be diallable soon.
-
- The moderator added a note that Michael's list included only diallable
- countries. In fact, with the exceptions noted above, it included all
- countries which have codes assigned, whether diallable or not. The
- only place listed as a political entity in the Britannica 1990 Book of
- the Year which does not have a code assigned is Pitcairn Island.
-
- There are a large number of countries not diallable, and, as a reader
- from Australia pointed out, the list of diallable countries differs
- from country to country. It's not even the same between the U.S. and
- Canada. For example, Canada (and most of the rest of the world) can
- dial Cuba (53), whereas the U.S. can only dial Guantanamo Bay U.S.
- Naval Station (53 99), which is not dialable from anywhere else! On
- the other hand, Canada cannot dial St. Pierre and Miquelon (508) even
- though it's only a couple of miles away from the coast, yet most of
- the rest of the world can!
-
- The following list of codes includes all of those codes dialable from
- the U.S. via the major carriers. AT&T serves the most countries; but
- Sprint makes the appearance of doing so by sending calls to countries
- it does not serve via AT&T circuits. In addition, there are three
- places to which AT&T only provides operator service, whereas Sprint
- provides direct dial service. These are indicated in parens. The
- problem is that Sprint has never notified the local operating
- companies that these codes should be opened in local central offices;
- thus they are not diallable except in a few places (mostly U.S. West)
- where the local operating company has decided to put all codes in
- CCITT E.163 in, whether anyone serves them or not. It should also be
- noted that AT&T serves every country in the world, although those not
- listed are served by operators only, whereas Sprint and other OCCs
- only serve diallable countries. AT&T has announced that dial service
- to Mayotte (currently Sprint only) is coming.
-
- 20 212 213 216 218 220 221 223 224 225 226 227 228 229
- 230 231 232 233 234 237 238 241 243 247 248 250 251 253 254 255 256
- 260 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 (269) 27 297 298 299
- 30 31 32 33 34 350 351 352 353 354 356 357 358 359
- 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
- 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509
- 51 52 5399 54 55 56 57 58
- 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599
- 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
- 670 671 673 (674) 675 676 (677) 679 684 685 686 687 689 691 692
- 7
- 81 82 852 853 86 871 872 873 880 886
- 90 91 92 94 95 960 962 964 965 966 967 968 971 972 973 974 977 98
-
- And finally, Colin Plumb asks which countries are part of the North
- American Intergrated Numbering Plan Area (code 1). They are:
-
- Canada, USA including Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands,
- Jamaica, Barbados, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Cayman Islands,
- British Virgin Islands, Bermuda, Bahamas, Dominica, Dominican
- Republic, Grenada, Montserrat, St. Christopher and Nevis,
- St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines (Bequia, Mustique,
- Prune (Palm) Island, Union Island), Trinidad and Tobago.
-
- What you will note about this list is that it includes the USA plus
- all members of the British Commonwealth in the Caribbean and North
- Atlantic. This definitively (at least for now) answers the question
- of why some places are in +1 809 and why some have their own code.
-
-
- /john
-
- P.S.: Michael's other list indicates that 905 and 706 "were" Mexico.
- From his point of view, outside the U.S., they never were. From the
- U.S. they still are and will be until discontinued in February 1991.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: "Peter J. Dotzauer" <pjd@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu>
- Subject: Re: My List of World Wide Codes
- Date: 30 May 90 14:17:52 GMT
- Organization: Ohio State Univ IRCC
-
-
- In article <8353@accuvax.nwu.edu> "Michael A. Shiels" <tmsoft!mshiels@
- uunet.uu.net> writes:
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 392, Message 2 of 5
-
- > 66- Thailand 670- Marianna Islands
- > 687- New Caledonia 688- Tuvalu, Saipan
-
- Saipan is a part of the Mariana Islands. Not only that, it comprises
- about 90 percent of its population. The rest is mainly on Tinian and
- Rota. Why does Saipan, a part of the Commonwealth of the Mariana
- Islands, have an area code together with a relatively distant country
- of 9 South Pacific Atolls (Tuvalu), while the rest of the Marianas has
- another area code.
-
- > 689- French Polynesia 690- Tokelan
- ^^^^^^^
- Should be Tokelau (a New Zealand territory).
-
-
- Peter Dotzauer, Analyt.Cart.& GIS, Dept.of Geogr., OSU, Columbus, OH 43210-1361
- TEL +1 614 292 1357 FAX +1 614 292 6213 FIDO 1:226/330 CCnet mapvxa::pjd
- INTERNET pjd+@osu.edu or pjd@hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu [128.146.1.5]
- BITNET pjd@ohstvmb UUCP ...!osu-cis!hpuxa.ircc.ohio-state.edu!pjd
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Subject: Re: My List of World Wide Codes
- From: Steve Pershing <sp@questor.wimsey.bc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 90 13:51:01 PDT
- Organization: The Questor Project, Vancouver BC, Canada
-
-
- Now that we have a list of world-wide country codes, does anyone have
- access to a relatively complete world-wide list of regional/city codes
- to go along with them?
-
- It would be a useful posting for future reference (unless they change
- often).
-
-
- Internet: sp@questor.wimsey.bc.ca |POST: 1027 Davie Street, Box 486
- Phones: Voice & FAX: +1 604 682-6659 | Vancouver, British Columbia
- Data/BBS: +1 604 681-0670 | Canada V6E 4L2
-
- [Moderator's Note: It's not that they 'change often' (although they
- do change), but rather, the inefficiency and wasted space of printing
- such a humongous and time-consuming (for you to type in, for readers
- to view, and most important! for me to edit) list in this forum. AT&T
- or the long-distance carrier of your choice has lots of books, charts
- and printed reference materials you can order if you feel you must
- have a list of everything, everywhere. The front pages of your local
- phone book probably contain many city codes for starters. PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30-MAY-1990 02:59:07.60
- From: "DOUGLAS SCOTT REUBEN)" <DREUBEN@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Subject: Re: My List of North American Area Codes
-
-
- Something else I noticed (from another one of Pat's postings, this one
- dealing with the "new" area codes in a revised area code list...):
-
- Perhaps I missed this in the discussion, but I noticed area codes like
- "411", "211", "611", "811", "511", and "200".
-
- Now 411 is used quite universally for Directory Assistance (DA)
- 611 is used similarly for repair.
- 811 is used by Pac*Bell for calls to their offices, etc.
- 211 is used in New York City to call for credit. (The ops. don't handle
- credit requests there.)
- 511 is used in Rcohester for ANA. (or whatever you call the automatic
- number announcement.)
- 911 is used for emergency services
- 200 is used for the same purpose in NE Tel territory. (200-222-2222,
- I think...).
-
- While I realize that it is POSSIBLE to use these numbers as area codes
- by placing a 1+ in front of them to distinguish the "area code" call
- from the "local service" call, in many areas, these X11 services take
- a 1+ in front of them.
-
- For example, in Connecticut, you must dial 1+411 for DA. (I think this
- is done so DA access can be restricted ... you don't need to dial
- 1+611 for repair.) I think this may also be so for Louisiana and some
- areas of Oregon, but I can't recall specifically ... (anyone in Bend,
- Oregon know if you need to dial 1+411? Or was it 1+555-1212? I never
- did it because they charge *50 cents* for a DA call from a payphone!)
-
- In some areas in New England, you need to dial 1-200-222-2222 for ANA
- (this doesn't seem to be universal though).
-
- Moreover, 1-611 is permitted (although by no means required) from what
- appear to be 1/AESS exchanges in the New York City area.
-
- So if those numbers are to be used as area codes, how will the present
- system be changed to accommodate the new are codes? Won't this be VERY
- confusing, as most customers who know "411" as directory assistance,
- "611" as repair, and "911" as Emerncy services tend to think of such
- numbers as "special" and thus reserved for such special uses?
-
- I would think that if anything, these numbers will be assigned last,
- way after 510, 310, etc. are all used up.
-
- Additionally, when we go to full 1+ dialing, where (almost) any three
- digits can be an area code, won't 1+xxx-xxxx dialing have to go away?
- IE, right now, I dial 1-890-1611 for NY Tel repair (upstate). Won't
- this be confusing to the switch when they assign area code "890"? IE,
- the switch will have to "time-out" to see if you mean "area code 890
- plus 7 more digits" or "toll call to number 890-xxxx". I'd personally
- prefer, if it becomes necessary, to get rid of in-area code 1+ dialing
- over having to wait for a call to timeout ... (Of course this is
- ALREADY a problem with 0+xxx-xxxx calls, but that can wait till
- another time! :-) )
-
-
- Doug
-
- dreuben@wesleyan.bitnet/@eagle.wesleyan.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 29-MAY-1990 12:58:39.99
- From: "Fred E.J. Linton" <FLINTON@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Subject: Re: TDD Long Distance Discount
-
-
- In <8374@accuvax.nwu.edu> gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore) writes:
-
- > Why isn't there a free relay service for email users to send to and
- > receive from fax machines? ... Or howabout a
- > Fax-to-voice service for the blind?
-
- It's not _quite_ free, but darned close: -- both AT&T Mail and
- MCI Mail certainly _send_ e-mail _to_ fax machines, at very nominal
- charges (and at least one of these outfits will also send e-mail to a
- teleprinter). Unconfirmed rumors (who knows, maybe they're even
- unwarranted :-) ) suggest they may _eventually_ serve as fax
- receiver/forwarders for their customers, as well, forwarding fax
- printout via USPS (this, however, is not yet an announced service).
-
- Not Fax-to-voice but e-mail-to-voice is a current offering at
- least of AT&T Mail (available, though I've never used it, from any TT
- phone in the US, maybe elsewhere -- 800 number and keypad overlay were
- provided with AT&T Mail's new customer documentation package when I
- joined up).
-
-
- Fred <FLinton@eagle.Wesleyan.EDU> <attmail!fejlinton>
- <414-2427@mcimail.com>
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30-MAY-1990 02:51:19
- From: "DOUGLAS SCOTT REUBEN)" <DREUBEN@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Subject: Ohio Bell vrs. Cincinnati Bell
-
-
- After reading Pat's 1982 re-posting of the Digest, I was wondering as
- to why there is an "Ohio Bell" telco and at the same time a
- "Cincinnati Bell" company as well?
-
- I've wondered about this for some time, but never bothered to ask...
-
- Is Cincinnati surrounded by a lot of GTE's or other independents so
- there is some physical separation between the two? Or is the reason
- for the presence of two Bell Companies in the same state based on
- historical reasons? (I realize that Cincinnati Bell was never
- controlled by AT&T, and thus not a "real" Bell Company, yet why would
- AT&T perpetuate a system like this in Ohio when it would seem logical
- to incorporate Cincinnati Bell into the larger (?) Ohio Bell...?)
-
- Just curious...
-
- Doug
-
- dreuben@eagle.wesleyan.edu
- dreuben@wesleyan.bitnet
- (and just plain old "dreuben" to locals...! :-) )
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: AT&T cannot 'incorporate' or take over what they do
- not own, any more than you or I can confiscate something belonging to
- someone else. They have never owned other than a small, minority share
- in Cincinnati Bell, despite the similar sounding 'Bell' name. At the
- same time, what was AT&T to call the company they *did* own in Ohio? PT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V10 #400
- ******************************
-