home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Usenet 1994 January
/
usenetsourcesnewsgroupsinfomagicjanuary1994.iso
/
answers
/
fuzzy-logic
/
part1
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-12-12
|
62KB
|
1,627 lines
Newsgroups: comp.ai.fuzzy,comp.answers,news.answers
Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!emory!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!honeydew.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!mkant
From: mkant+@cs.cmu.edu (Mark Kantrowitz)
Subject: FAQ: Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Expert Systems 1/1 [Monthly posting]
Message-ID: <fuzzy.faq_755770552@cs.cmu.edu>
Followup-To: poster
Summary: Answers to Frequently Asked Fuzzy Questions. Read before posting.
Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
Supersedes: <fuzzy.faq_753178147@cs.cmu.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: a.gp.cs.cmu.edu
Reply-To: mkant+fuzzy-faq@cs.cmu.edu
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1993 08:16:33 GMT
Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.EDU
Expires: Mon, 24 Jan 1994 08:15:52 GMT
Lines: 1608
Xref: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu comp.ai.fuzzy:1517 comp.answers:2984 news.answers:15732
Archive-name: fuzzy-logic/part1
Last-modified: Tue Oct 12 21:38:16 1993 by Mark Kantrowitz
Version: 1.4
;;; *****************************************************************
;;; Answers to Questions about Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Expert Systems *
;;; *****************************************************************
;;; Written by Erik Horstkotte, Cliff Joslyn, and Mark Kantrowitz
;;; fuzzy.faq -- 61864 bytes
Contributions and corrections should be sent to the mailing list
mkant+fuzzy-faq@cs.cmu.edu.
Note that the mkant+fuzzy-faq@cs.cmu.edu mailing list is for
discussion of the content of the FAQ posting only by the FAQ
maintainers. It is not the place to ask questions about fuzzy logic
and fuzzy expert systems; use the newsgroup comp.ai.fuzzy for that. If
a question appears frequently in that forum, it will get added to the
FAQ list.
The original version of this FAQ posting was prepared by Erik Horstkotte
of Togai InfraLogic <erik@til.com>, with significant contributions by
Cliff Joslyn <cjoslyn@bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu>. The FAQ is
maintained by Mark Kantrowitz <mkant@cs.cmu.edu> with advice from Erik
and Cliff. To reach us, send mail to mkant+fuzzy-faq@cs.cmu.edu.
Thanks also go to Michael Arras <arras@forwiss.uni-erlangen.de> for
running the vote which resulted in the creation of comp.ai.fuzzy,
Yokichi Tanaka <tanaka@til.com> for help in putting the FAQ together,
and Walter Hafner <hafner@informatik.tu-muenchen.de>, Satoru Isaka
<isaka@oas.omron.com>, Henrik Legind Larsen <hll@ruc.dk>, Tom Parish
<tparish@tpis.cactus.org>, Liliane Peters <peters@borneo.gmd.de>, Naji
Rizk <nrr1000@phx.cam.ac.uk>, Peter Stegmaier <peter@ifr.ethz.ch>, Prof.
J.L. Verdegay <jverdegay@ugr.es>, and Dr. John Yen <yen@cs.tamu.edu> for
contributions to the initial contents of the FAQ.
This FAQ is posted once a month on the 13th of the month. In between
postings, the latest version of this FAQ is available by anonymous ftp
from CMU:
To obtain the file from CMU, connect by anonymous ftp to any CMU CS
machine (e.g., ftp.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.206.173]), using username
"anonymous" and password "name@host". The file fuzzy.faq
is located in the directory
/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/ai-repository/ai/pubs/faqs/fuzzy/
[Note: You must cd to this directory in one atomic operation, as
some of the superior directories on the path are protected from
access by anonymous ftp.] If your site runs the Andrew File System,
you can just cp the file directly without bothering with FTP.
The FAQ postings are also archived in the periodic posting archive on
rtfm.mit.edu [18.70.0.209]. Look in the anonymous ftp directory
/pub/usenet/news.answers/ in the subdirectory fuzzy-logic/. If you do not
have anonymous ftp access, you can access the archive by mail server
as well. Send an E-mail message to mail-server@rtfm.mit.edu
with "help" and "index" in the body on separate lines for more
information.
Table of Contents:
[1] What is the purpose of this newsgroup?
[2] What is fuzzy logic?
[3] Where is fuzzy logic used?
[4] What is a fuzzy expert system?
[5] Where are fuzzy expert systems used?
[6] What is fuzzy control?
[7] What are fuzzy numbers and fuzzy arithmetic?
[8] Isn't "fuzzy logic" an inherent contradiction?
Why would anyone want to fuzzify logic?
[9] How are membership values determined?
[10] What is the relationship between fuzzy truth values and probabilities?
[11] Are there fuzzy state machines?
[12] What is possibility theory?
[13] How can I get a copy of the proceedings for <x>?
[14] Fuzzy BBS Systems, Mail-servers and FTP Repositories
[15] Mailing Lists
[16] Bibliography
[17] Journals and Technical Newsletters
[18] Professional Organizations
[19] Companies Supplying Fuzzy Tools
[20] Fuzzy Researchers
Search for [#] to get to topic number # quickly. In newsreaders which
support digests (such as rn), [CNTL]-G will page through the answers.
Recent changes:
;;; 21-APR-93 eh Corrected crisp value of Centroid defuzzification and added
;;; example.
;;; 21-APR-93 mk Two corrections from Dr. Aivars Celmins wrt IFSA entry.
;;; 20-MAY-93 mk Minor changes to [7] and [10].
;;; 7-JUN-93 mk Added pointer to Josef Benedikt's bibliography to 16.
;;;
;;; 1.1:
;;; 26-JUL-93 mk Corrected error in table in [4].
;;; 27-JUL-93 mk Added some references to 2, 16, and 17.
;;;
;;; 1.2:
;;; 24-AUG-93 mk Updated information about the Huntington Technical Brief.
;;;
;;; 1.3:
;;; 13-SEP-93 mk Fuzzy-Mail and NAFIPS-L gatewayed to comp.ai.fuzzy.
;;; 28-SEP-93 mk Updated Fuzzy-Mail list info.
;;;
;;; 1.4:
;;; 12-OCT-93 mk Added Terano text.
================================================================
Subject: [1] What is the purpose of this newsgroup?
Date: 15-APR-93
The comp.ai.fuzzy newsgroup was created in January 1993, for the purpose
of providing a forum for the discussion of fuzzy logic, fuzzy expert
systems, and related topics.
================================================================
Subject: [2] What is fuzzy logic?
Date: 15-APR-93
Fuzzy logic is a superset of conventional (Boolean) logic that has been
extended to handle the concept of partial truth -- truth values between
"completely true" and "completely false". It was introduced by Dr. Lotfi
Zadeh of UC/Berkeley in the 1960's as a means to model the uncertainty
of natural language. (Note: Lotfi, not Lofti, is the correct spelling
of his name.)
Zadeh says that rather than regarding fuzzy theory as a single theory, we
should regard the process of ``fuzzification'' as a methodology to
generalize ANY specific theory from a crisp (discrete) to a continuous
(fuzzy) form (see "extension principle" in [2]). Thus recently researchers
have also introduced "fuzzy calculus", "fuzzy differential equations",
and so on (see [7]).
Fuzzy Subsets:
Just as there is a strong relationship between Boolean logic and the
concept of a subset, there is a similar strong relationship between fuzzy
logic and fuzzy subset theory.
In classical set theory, a subset U of a set S can be defined as a
mapping from the elements of S to the elements of the set {0, 1},
U: S --> {0, 1}
This mapping may be represented as a set of ordered pairs, with exactly
one ordered pair present for each element of S. The first element of the
ordered pair is an element of the set S, and the second element is an
element of the set {0, 1}. The value zero is used to represent
non-membership, and the value one is used to represent membership. The
truth or falsity of the statement
x is in U
is determined by finding the ordered pair whose first element is x. The
statement is true if the second element of the ordered pair is 1, and the
statement is false if it is 0.
Similarly, a fuzzy subset F of a set S can be defined as a set of ordered
pairs, each with the first element from S, and the second element from
the interval [0,1], with exactly one ordered pair present for each
element of S. This defines a mapping between elements of the set S and
values in the interval [0,1]. The value zero is used to represent
complete non-membership, the value one is used to represent complete
membership, and values in between are used to represent intermediate
DEGREES OF MEMBERSHIP. The set S is referred to as the UNIVERSE OF
DISCOURSE for the fuzzy subset F. Frequently, the mapping is described
as a function, the MEMBERSHIP FUNCTION of F. The degree to which the
statement
x is in F
is true is determined by finding the ordered pair whose first element is
x. The DEGREE OF TRUTH of the statement is the second element of the
ordered pair.
In practice, the terms "membership function" and fuzzy subset get used
interchangeably.
That's a lot of mathematical baggage, so here's an example. Let's
talk about people and "tallness". In this case the set S (the
universe of discourse) is the set of people. Let's define a fuzzy
subset TALL, which will answer the question "to what degree is person
x tall?" Zadeh describes TALL as a LINGUISTIC VARIABLE, which
represents our cognitive category of "tallness". To each person in the
universe of discourse, we have to assign a degree of membership in the
fuzzy subset TALL. The easiest way to do this is with a membership
function based on the person's height.
tall(x) = { 0, if height(x) < 5 ft.,
(height(x)-5ft.)/2ft., if 5 ft. <= height (x) <= 7 ft.,
1, if height(x) > 7 ft. }
A graph of this looks like:
1.0 + +-------------------
| /
| /
0.5 + /
| /
| /
0.0 +-------------+-----+-------------------
| |
5.0 7.0
height, ft. ->
Given this definition, here are some example values:
Person Height degree of tallness
--------------------------------------
Billy 3' 2" 0.00 [I think]
Yoke 5' 5" 0.21
Drew 5' 9" 0.38
Erik 5' 10" 0.42
Mark 6' 1" 0.54
Kareem 7' 2" 1.00 [depends on who you ask]
Expressions like "A is X" can be interpreted as degrees of truth,
e.g., "Drew is TALL" = 0.38.
Note: Membership functions used in most applications almost never have as
simple a shape as tall(x). At minimum, they tend to be triangles pointing
up, and they can be much more complex than that. Also, the discussion
characterizes membership functions as if they always are based on a
single criterion, but this isn't always the case, although it is quite
common. One could, for example, want to have the membership function for
TALL depend on both a person's height and their age (he's tall for his
age). This is perfectly legitimate, and occasionally used in practice.
It's referred to as a two-dimensional membership function, or a "fuzzy
relation". It's also possible to have even more criteria, or to have the
membership function depend on elements from two completely different
universes of discourse.
Logic Operations:
Now that we know what a statement like "X is LOW" means in fuzzy logic,
how do we interpret a statement like
X is LOW and Y is HIGH or (not Z is MEDIUM)
The standard definitions in fuzzy logic are:
truth (not x) = 1.0 - truth (x)
truth (x and y) = minimum (truth(x), truth(y))
truth (x or y) = maximum (truth(x), truth(y))
Some researchers in fuzzy logic have explored the use of other
interpretations of the AND and OR operations, but the definition for the
NOT operation seems to be safe.
Note that if you plug just the values zero and one into these
definitions, you get the same truth tables as you would expect from
conventional Boolean logic. This is known as the EXTENSION PRINCIPLE,
which states that the classical results of Boolean logic are recovered
from fuzzy logic operations when all fuzzy membership grades are
restricted to the traditional set {0, 1}. This effectively establishes
fuzzy subsets and logic as a true generalization of classical set theory
and logic. In fact, by this reasoning all crisp (traditional) subsets ARE
fuzzy subsets of this very special type; and there is no conflict between
fuzzy and crisp methods.
Some examples -- assume the same definition of TALL as above, and in addition,
assume that we have a fuzzy subset OLD defined by the membership function:
old (x) = { 0, if age(x) < 18 yr.
(age(x)-18 yr.)/42 yr., if 18 yr. <= age(x) <= 60 yr.
1, if age(x) > 60 yr. }
And for compactness, let
a = X is TALL and X is OLD
b = X is TALL or X is OLD
c = not X is TALL
Then we can compute the following values.
height age X is TALL X is OLD a b c
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3' 2" 65? 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
5' 5" 30 0.21 0.29 0.21 0.29 0.79
5' 9" 27 0.38 0.21 0.21 0.38 0.62
5' 10" 32 0.42 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.58
6' 1" 31 0.54 0.31 0.31 0.54 0.46
7' 2" 45? 1.00 0.64 0.64 1.00 0.00
3' 4" 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
An excellent introductory article is:
Bezdek, James C, "Fuzzy Models --- What Are They, and Why?", IEEE
Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 1:1, pp. 1-6, 1993.
For more information on fuzzy logic operators, see:
Bandler, W., and Kohout, L.J., "Fuzzy Power Sets and Fuzzy Implication
Operators", Fuzzy Sets and Systems 4:13-30, 1980.
Dubois, Didier, and Prade, H., "A Class of Fuzzy Measures Based on
Triangle Inequalities", Int. J. Gen. Sys. 8.
The original papers on fuzzy logic include:
Zadeh, Lotfi, "Fuzzy Sets," Information and Control 8:338-353, 1965.
Zadeh, Lotfi, "Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex
Systems", IEEE Trans. on Sys., Man and Cyb. 3, 1973.
Zadeh, Lotfi, "The Calculus of Fuzzy Restrictions", in Fuzzy Sets and
Applications to Cognitive and Decision Making Processes, edited
by L. A. Zadeh et. al., Academic Press, New York, 1975, pages 1-39.
================================================================
Subject: [3] Where is fuzzy logic used?
Date: 15-APR-93
Fuzzy logic is used directly in very few applications. The Sony PalmTop
apparently uses a fuzzy logic decision tree algorithm to perform
handwritten (well, computer lightpen) Kanji character recognition.
Most applications of fuzzy logic use it as the underlying logic system
for fuzzy expert systems (see [4]).
================================================================
Subject: [4] What is a fuzzy expert system?
Date: 21-APR-93
A fuzzy expert system is an expert system that uses a collection of
fuzzy membership functions and rules, instead of Boolean logic, to
reason about data. The rules in a fuzzy expert system are usually of a
form similar to the following:
if x is low and y is high then z = medium
where x and y are input variables (names for know data values), z is an
output variable (a name for a data value to be computed), low is a
membership function (fuzzy subset) defined on x, high is a membership
function defined on y, and medium is a membership function defined on z.
The antecedent (the rule's premise) describes to what degree the rule
applies, while the conclusion (the rule's consequent) assigns a
membership function to each of one or more output variables. Most tools
for working with fuzzy expert systems allow more than one conclusion per
rule. The set of rules in a fuzzy expert system is known as the rulebase
or knowledge base.
The general inference process proceeds in three (or four) steps.
1. Under FUZZIFICATION, the membership functions defined on the
input variables are applied to their actual values, to determine the
degree of truth for each rule premise.
2. Under INFERENCE, the truth value for the premise of each rule is
computed, and applied to the conclusion part of each rule. This results
in one fuzzy subset to be assigned to each output variable for each
rule. Usually only MIN or PRODUCT are used as inference rules. In MIN
inferencing, the output membership function is clipped off at a height
corresponding to the rule premise's computed degree of truth (fuzzy
logic AND). In PRODUCT inferencing, the output membership function is
scaled by the rule premise's computed degree of truth.
3. Under COMPOSITION, all of the fuzzy subsets assigned to each output
variable are combined together to form a single fuzzy subset
for each output variable. Again, usually MAX or SUM are used. In MAX
composition, the combined output fuzzy subset is constructed by taking
the pointwise maximum over all of the fuzzy subsets assigned tovariable
by the inference rule (fuzzy logic OR). In SUM composition, the
combined output fuzzy subset is constructed by taking the pointwise sum
over all of the fuzzy subsets assigned to the output variable by the
inference rule.
4. Finally is the (optional) DEFUZZIFICATION, which is used when it is
useful to convert the fuzzy output set to a crisp number. There are
more defuzzification methods than you can shake a stick at (at least
30). Two of the more common techniques are the CENTROID and MAXIMUM
methods. In the CENTROID method, the crisp value of the output variable
is computed by finding the variable value of the center of gravity of
the membership function for the fuzzy value. In the MAXIMUM method, one
of the variable values at which the fuzzy subset has its maximum truth
value is chosen as the crisp value for the output variable.
Extended Example:
Assume that the variables x, y, and z all take on values in the interval
[0,10], and that the following membership functions and rules are defined:
low(t) = 1 - ( t / 10 )
high(t) = t / 10
rule 1: if x is low and y is low then z is high
rule 2: if x is low and y is high then z is low
rule 3: if x is high and y is low then z is low
rule 4: if x is high and y is high then z is high
Notice that instead of assigning a single value to the output variable z, each
rule assigns an entire fuzzy subset (low or high).
Notes:
1. In this example, low(t)+high(t)=1.0 for all t. This is not required, but
it is fairly common.
2. The value of t at which low(t) is maximum is the same as the value of t at
which high(t) is minimum, and vice-versa. This is also not required, but
fairly common.
3. The same membership functions are used for all variables. This isn't
required, and is also *not* common.
In the fuzzification subprocess, the membership functions defined on the
input variables are applied to their actual values, to determine the
degree of truth for each rule premise. The degree of truth for a rule's
premise is sometimes referred to as its ALPHA. If a rule's premise has a
nonzero degree of truth (if the rule applies at all...) then the rule is
said to FIRE. For example,
x y low(x) high(x) low(y) high(y) alpha1 alpha2 alpha3 alpha4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 3.2 1.0 0.0 0.68 0.32 0.68 0.32 0.0 0.0
0.0 6.1 1.0 0.0 0.39 0.61 0.39 0.61 0.0 0.0
0.0 10.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
3.2 0.0 0.68 0.32 1.0 0.0 0.68 0.0 0.32 0.0
6.1 0.0 0.39 0.61 1.0 0.0 0.39 0.0 0.61 0.0
10.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
3.2 3.1 0.68 0.32 0.69 0.31 0.68 0.31 0.32 0.31
3.2 3.3 0.68 0.32 0.67 0.33 0.67 0.33 0.32 0.32
10.0 10.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
In the inference subprocess, the truth value for the premise of each rule is
computed, and applied to the conclusion part of each rule. This results in
one fuzzy subset to be assigned to each output variable for each rule.
MIN and PRODUCT are two INFERENCE METHODS or INFERENCE RULES. In MIN
inferencing, the output membership function is clipped off at a height
corresponding to the rule premise's computed degree of truth. This
corresponds to the traditional interpretation of the fuzzy logic AND
operation. In PRODUCT inferencing, the output membership function is
scaled by the rule premise's computed degree of truth.
For example, let's look at rule 1 for x = 0.0 and y = 3.2. As shown in the
table above, the premise degree of truth works out to 0.68. For this rule,
MIN inferencing will assign z the fuzzy subset defined by the membership
function:
rule1(z) = { z / 10, if z <= 6.8
0.68, if z >= 6.8 }
For the same conditions, PRODUCT inferencing will assign z the fuzzy subset
defined by the membership function:
rule1(z) = 0.68 * high(z)
= 0.068 * z
Note: The terminology used here is slightly nonstandard. In most texts,
the term "inference method" is used to mean the combination of the things
referred to separately here as "inference" and "composition." Thus
you'll see such terms as "MAX-MIN inference" and "SUM-PRODUCT inference"
in the literature. They are the combination of MAX composition and MIN
inference, or SUM composition and PRODUCT inference, respectively.
You'll also see the reverse terms "MIN-MAX" and "PRODUCT-SUM" -- these
mean the same things as the reverse order. It seems clearer to describe
the two processes separately.
In the composition subprocess, all of the fuzzy subsets assigned to each
output variable are combined together to form a single fuzzy subset for each
output variable.
MAX composition and SUM composition are two COMPOSITION RULES. In MAX
composition, the combined output fuzzy subset is constructed by taking
the pointwise maximum over all of the fuzzy subsets assigned to the
output variable by the inference rule. In SUM composition, the combined
output fuzzy subset is constructed by taking the pointwise sum over all
of the fuzzy subsets assigned to the output variable by the inference
rule. Note that this can result in truth values greater than one! For
this reason, SUM composition is only used when it will be followed by a
defuzzification method, such as the CENTROID method, that doesn't have a
problem with this odd case. Otherwise SUM composition can be combined
with normalization and is therefore a general purpose method again.
For example, assume x = 0.0 and y = 3.2. MIN inferencing would assign the
following four fuzzy subsets to z:
rule1(z) = { z / 10, if z <= 6.8
0.68, if z >= 6.8 }
rule2(z) = { 0.32, if z <= 6.8
1 - z / 10, if z >= 6.8 }
rule3(z) = 0.0
rule4(z) = 0.0
MAX composition would result in the fuzzy subset:
fuzzy(z) = { 0.32, if z <= 3.2
z / 10, if 3.2 <= z <= 6.8
0.68, if z >= 6.8 }
PRODUCT inferencing would assign the following four fuzzy subsets to z:
rule1(z) = 0.068 * z
rule2(z) = 0.32 - 0.032 * z
rule3(z) = 0.0
rule4(z) = 0.0
SUM composition would result in the fuzzy subset:
fuzzy(z) = 0.32 + 0.036 * z
Sometimes it is useful to just examine the fuzzy subsets that are the
result of the composition process, but more often, this FUZZY VALUE needs
to be converted to a single number -- a CRISP VALUE. This is what the
defuzzification subprocess does.
There are more defuzzification methods than you can shake a stick at. A
couple of years ago, Mizumoto did a short paper that compared about ten
defuzzification methods. Two of the more common techniques are the
CENTROID and MAXIMUM methods. In the CENTROID method, the crisp value of
the output variable is computed by finding the variable value of the
center of gravity of the membership function for the fuzzy value. In the
MAXIMUM method, one of the variable values at which the fuzzy subset has
its maximum truth value is chosen as the crisp value for the output
variable. There are several variations of the MAXIMUM method that differ
only in what they do when there is more than one variable value at which
this maximum truth value occurs. One of these, the AVERAGE-OF-MAXIMA
method, returns the average of the variable values at which the maximum
truth value occurs.
For example, go back to our previous examples. Using MAX-MIN inferencing
and AVERAGE-OF-MAXIMA defuzzification results in a crisp value of 8.4 for
z. Using PRODUCT-SUM inferencing and CENTROID defuzzification results in
a crisp value of 5.6 for z, as follows.
Earlier on in the FAQ, we state that all variables (including z) take on
values in the range [0, 10]. To compute the centroid of the function f(x),
you divide the moment of the function by the area of the function. To compute
the moment of f(x), you compute the integral of x*f(x) dx, and to compute the
area of f(x), you compute the integral of f(x) dx. In this case, we would
compute the area as integral from 0 to 10 of (0.32+0.036*z) dz, which is
(0.32 * 10 + 0.018*100) =
(3.2 + 1.8) =
5.0
and the moment as the integral from 0 to 10 of (0.32*z+0.036*z*z) dz, which is
(0.16 * 10 * 10 + 0.012 * 10 * 10 * 10) =
(16 + 12) =
28
Finally, the centroid is 28/5 or 5.6.
Note: Sometimes the composition and defuzzification processes are
combined, taking advantage of mathematical relationships that simplify
the process of computing the final output variable values.
The Mizumoto referece is probably "Improvement Methods of Fuzzy
Controls", in Proceedings of the 3rd IFSA Congress, pages 60-62, 1989.
================================================================
Subject: [5] Where are fuzzy expert systems used?
Date: 15-APR-93
To date, fuzzy expert systems are the most common use of fuzzy logic. They
are used in several wide-ranging fields, including:
o Linear and Nonlinear Control
o Pattern Recognition
o Financial Systems
o Operation Research
o Data Analysis
================================================================
Subject: [6] What is fuzzy control?
Date: 15-APR-93
[Anybody want to write an answer?]
References:
Yager, R.R., and Zadeh, L. A., "An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic
Applications in Intelligent Systems", Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
================================================================
Subject: [7] What are fuzzy numbers and fuzzy arithmetic?
Date: 15-APR-93
Fuzzy numbers are fuzzy subsets of the real line. They have a peak or
plateau with membership grade 1, over which the members of the
universe are completely in the set. The membership function is
increasing towards the peak and decreasing away from it.
Fuzzy numbers are used very widely in fuzzy control applications. A typical
case is the triangular fuzzy number
1.0 + +
| / \
| / \
0.5 + / \
| / \
| / \
0.0 +-------------+-----+-----+--------------
| | |
5.0 7.0 9.0
which is one form of the fuzzy number 7. Slope and trapezoidal functions
are also used, as are exponential curves similar to Gaussian probability
densities.
For more information, see:
Dubois, Didier, and Prade, Henri, "Fuzzy Numbers: An Overview", in
Analysis of Fuzzy Information 1:3-39, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1987.
Dubois, Didier, and Prade, Henri, "Mean Value of a Fuzzy Number",
Fuzzy Sets and Systems 24(3):279-300, 1987.
Kaufmann, A., and Gupta, M.M., "Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic",
Reinhold, New York, 1985.
================================================================
Subject: [8] Isn't "fuzzy logic" an inherent contradiction?
Why would anyone want to fuzzify logic?
Date: 15-APR-93
Fuzzy sets and logic must be viewed as a formal mathematical theory for
the representation of uncertainty. Uncertainty is crucial for the
management of real systems: if you had to park your car PRECISELY in one
place, it would not be possible. Instead, you work within, say, 10 cm
tolerances. The presence of uncertainty is the price you pay for handling
a complex system.
Nevertheless, fuzzy logic is a mathematical formalism, and a membership
grade is a precise number. What's crucial to realize is that fuzzy logic
is a logic OF fuzziness, not a logic which is ITSELF fuzzy. But that's
OK: just as the laws of probability are not random, so the laws of
fuzziness are not vague.
================================================================
Subject: [9] How are membership values determined?
Date: 15-APR-93
Determination methods break down broadly into the following categories:
1. Subjective evaluation and elicitation
As fuzzy sets are usually intended to model people's cognitive states,
they can be determined from either simple or sophisticated elicitation
procedures. At they very least, subjects simply draw or otherwise specify
different membership curves appropriate to a given problem. These
subjects are typcially experts in the problem area. Or they are given a
more constrained set of possible curves from which they choose. Under
more complex methods, users can be tested using psychological methods.
2. Ad-hoc forms
While there is a vast (hugely infinite) array of possible membership
function forms, most actual fuzzy control operations draw from a very
small set of different curves, for example simple forms of fuzzy numbers
(see [7]). This simplifies the problem, for example to choosing just the
central value and the slope on either side.
3. Converted frequencies or probabilities
Sometimes information taken in the form of frequency histograms or other
probability curves are used as the basis to construct a membership
function. There are a variety of possible conversion methods, each with
its own mathematical and methodological strengths and weaknesses.
However, it should always be remembered that membership functions are NOT
(necessarily) probabilities. See [10] for more information.
4. Physical measurement
Many applications of fuzzy logic use physical measurement, but almost
none measure the membership grade directly. Instead, a membership
function is provided by another method, and then the individual
membership grades of data are calculated from it (see FUZZIFICATION in [4]).
5. Learning and adaptation
For more information, see:
Roberts, D.W., "Analysis of Forest Succession with Fuzzy Graph Theory",
Ecological Modeling, 45:261-274, 1989.
Turksen, I.B., "Measurement of Fuzziness: Interpretiation of the Axioms
of Measure", in Proceeding of the Conference on Fuzzy Information and
Knowledge Representation for Decision Analysis, pages 97-102, IFAC,
Oxford, 1984.
================================================================
Subject: [10] What is the relationship between fuzzy truth values and
probabilities?
Date: 15-APR-93
Fuzzy values are commonly misunderstood to be probabilities, or fuzzy
logic is interpreted as some new way of handling probabilities. But this is
not the case. A minimum requirement of probabilities is ADDITIVITY, that is
that they must add together to one, or the integral of their density curves
must be one.
But this is not the case in general with membership grades. And while
membership grades can be determined with probability densities in mind
(see [11]), there are other methods as well which have nothing to do with
frequencies or probabilities.
Because of this, fuzzy researchers have gone to great pains to distance
themselves from probability. But in so doing, many of them have lost track
of another point, which is that the converse DOES hold: all probability
distributions are fuzzy sets! As fuzzy sets and logic generalize Boolean
sets and logic, they also generalize probability.
In fact, from a mathematical perspective, fuzzy sets and probability
exist as parts of a greater Generalized Information Theory which also
includes random sets, Demster-Shafer evidence theory, probability
intervals, possibility theory, fuzzy measures, and so on. Furthermore,
one can also talk about random fuzzy events and fuzzy random events. This
whole issue is beyond the scope of this FAQ, so please refer to the
following articles, or the textbook by Klir and Folger (see [16]).
Delgado, M., and Moral, S., "On the Concept of Possibility-Probability
Consistency", Fuzzy Sets and Systems 21:311-318, 1987.
Dempster, A.P., "Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued
Mapping", Annals of Math. Stat. 38:325-339, 1967.
Henkind, Steven J., and Harrison, Malcolm C., "Analysis of Four
Uncertainty Calculi", IEEE Trans. Man Sys. Cyb. 18(5)700-714, 1988.
Kamp`e de, F'eriet J., "Interpretation of Membership Functions of Fuzzy
Sets in Terms of Plausibility and Belief", in Fuzzy Information and
Decision Process, M.M. Gupta and E. Sanchez (editors), pages 93-98,
North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.
Klir, George, "Is There More to Uncertainty than Some Probability
Theorists Would Have Us Believe?", Int. J. Gen. Sys. 15(4):347-378, 1989.
Klir, George, "Generalized Information Theory", Fuzzy Sets and Systems
40:127-142, 1991.
Klir, George, "Probabilistic vs. Possibilistic Conceptualization of
Uncertainty", in Analysis and Management of Uncertainty, B.M. Ayyub et.
al. (editors), pages 13-25, Elsevier, 1992.
Klir, George, and Parviz, Behvad, "Probability-Possibility
Transformations: A Comparison", Int. J. Gen. Sys. 21(1):291-310, 1992.
Kosko, B., "Fuzziness vs. Probability", Int. J. Gen. Sys.
17(2-3):211-240, 1990.
Puri, M.L., and Ralescu, D.A., "Fuzzy Random Variables", J. Math.
Analysis and Applications, 114:409-422, 1986.
Shafer, Glen, "A Mathematical Theory of Evidence", Princeton University,
Princeton, 1976.
================================================================
Subject: [11] Are there fuzzy state machines?
Date: 15-APR-93
Yes. FSMs are obtained by assigning membership grades as weights to the
states of a machine, weights on transitions between states, and then a
composition rule such as MAX/MIN or PLUS/TIMES (see [4]) to calculate new
grades of future states. Refer to the following article, or to Section
III of the Dubois and Prade's 1980 textbook (see [16]).
Gaines, Brian R., and Kohout, Ladislav J., "Logic of Automata",
Int. J. Gen. Sys. 2(4):191-208, 1976.
================================================================
Subject: [12] What is possibility theory?
Date: 15-APR-93
Possibility theory is a new form of information theory which is related
to but independent of both fuzzy sets and probability theory.
Technically, a possibility distribution is a normal fuzzy set (at least
one membership grade equals 1). For example, all fuzzy numbers are
possibility distributions. However, possibility theory can also be
derived without reference to fuzzy sets.
The rules of possibility theory are similar to probability theory, but
use either MAX/MIN or MAX/TIMES calculus, rather than the PLUS/TIMES
calculus of probability theory. Also, possibilistic NONSPECIFICITY is
available as a measure of information similar to the stochastic
ENTROPY.
Possibility theory has a methodological advantage over probability theory
as a representation of nondeterminism in systems, because the PLUS/TIMES
calculus does not validly generalize nondeterministic processes, while
MAX/MIN and MAX/TIMES do.
For further information, see:
Dubois, Didier, and Prade, Henri, "Possibility Theory", Plenum Press,
New York, 1988.
Joslyn, Cliff, "Possibilistic Measurement and Set Statistics",
in Proceedings of the 1992 NAFIPS Conference 2:458-467, NASA, 1992.
Joslyn, Cliff, "Possibilistic Semantics and Measurement Methods in
Complex Systems", in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on
Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, Bilal Ayyub (editor), IEEE Computer
Society 1993.
Wang, Zhenyuan, and Klir, George J., "Fuzzy Measure Theory", Plenum
Press, New York, 1991.
Zadeh, Lotfi, "Fuzzy Sets as the Basis for a Theory of Possibility",
Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1:3-28, 1978.
================================================================
Subject: [13] How can I get a copy of the proceedings for <x>?
Date: 15-APR-93
This is rough sometimes. The first thing to do, of course, is to contact
the organization that ran the conference or workshop you are interested in.
If they can't help you, the best idea mentioned so far is to contact the
Institute for Scientific Information, Inc. (ISI), and check with their
Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (ISTP volumes).
Institute for Scientific Information, Inc.
3501 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Phone: +1.215.386.0100
Fax: +1.215.386.6362
Cable: SCINFO
Telex: 84-5305
================================================================
Subject: [14] Fuzzy BBS Systems, Mail-servers and FTP Repositories
Date: 24-AUG-93
Aptronix FuzzyNET BBS and Email Server:
408-428-1883, 1200-9600 N/8/1
This BBS contains a range of fuzzy-related material, including:
o Application notes.
o Product brochures.
o Technical information.
o Archived articles from the USENET newsgroup comp.ai.fuzzy.
o Text versions of "The Huntington Technical Brief" by Dr. Brubaker.
[The technical brief is no longer being updated, as Dr. Brubaker
now charges for subscriptions. See [17] for details.]
The Aptronix FuzzyNET Email Server allows anyone with access to Internet
email access to all of the files on the FuzzyNET BBS.
To receive instructions on how to access the server, send the following
message to fuzzynet@aptronix.com:
begin
help
end
If you don't receive a response within a day or two, or need help, contact
Scott Irwin <irwin@aptronix.com> for assistance.
Electronic Design News (EDN) BBS:
617-558-4241, 1200-9600 N/8/1
Motorola FREEBBS:
512-891-3733, 1200-9600 E/7/1
Ostfold Regional College Fuzzy Logic Anonymous FTP Repository:
ftp.dhhalden.no:fuzzy/ is a recently-started ftp site for fuzzy-related
material, operated by Ostfold Regional College in Norway. Currently has
files from the Togai InfraLogic Fuzzy Logic Email Server, Tim Butler's
Fuzzy Logic Anonymous FTP Repository, and some demo programs. Material to
be included in the archive (e.g., papers and code) may be placed in the
upload/ directory. Send email to Asgeir Osterhus, <asgeiro@dhhalden.no>.
Tim Butler's Fuzzy Logic Anonymous FTP Repository & Email Server:
ntia.its.bldrdoc.gov:pub/fuzzy contains information concerning fuzzy
logic, including bibliographies (bib/), product descriptions and demo
versions (com/), machine readable published papers (lit/), miscellaneous
information, documents and reports (txt/), and programs code and compilers
(prog/). You may download new items into the new/ subdirectory, or send
them by email to fuzzy@its.bldrdoc.gov. If you deposit anything in new/,
please inform fuzzy@its.bldrdoc.gov. The repository is maintained by
Timothy Butler, tim@its.bldrdoc.gov.
The Fuzzy Logic Repository is also accessible through a mail server,
rnalib@its.bldrdoc.gov. For help on using the server, send mail to the
server with the following line in the body of the message:
@@ help
Togai InfraLogic Fuzzy Logic Email Server:
The Togai InfraLogic Fuzzy Logic Email Server allows anyone with access
to Internet email access to:
o PostScript copies of TIL's company newsletter, The Fuzzy Source.
o ASCII files for selected newsletter articles.
o Archived articles from the USENET newsgroup comp.ai.fuzzy.
o Fuzzy logic demonstration programs.
o Demonstration versions of TIL products.
o Conference announcements.
o User-contributed files.
To receive instructions on how to access the server, send the following
message, with no subject, to fuzzy-server@til.com.
help
If you don't receive a response within a day or two, contact either
erik@til.com or tanaka@til.com for assistance.
Most of the contents of TIL's email server are mirrored by Tim Butler's
Fuzzy Logic Anonymous FTP Repository and the Ostfold Regional College
Fuzzy Logic Anonymous FTP Repository in Norway.
The Turning Point BBS:
512-219-7828/7848, DS/HST 1200-19,200 N/8/1
Fuzzy logic and neural network related files.
Miscellaneous Fuzzy Logic Files:
The "General Purpose Fuzzy Reasoning Library" is available by
anonymous FTP from utsun.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp:fj/fj.sources/v25/2577.Z
[133.11.11.11]. This yields the "General-Purpose Fuzzy Inference
Library Ver. 3.0 (1/1)". The program is in C, with English comments,
but the documentation is in Japanese. Some English documentation has
been written by John Nagle, <nagle@shasta.stanford.edu>.
================================================================
Subject: [15] Mailing Lists
Date: 15-APR-93
The Fuzzy-Mail and NAFIPS-L mailing lists are now bidirectionally
gatewayed to the comp.ai.fuzzy newsgroup.
NAFIPS Fuzzy Logic Mailing List:
This is a mailing list for the discussion of fuzzy logic, NAFIPS and
related topics, located at the Georgia State University. The last time
that this FAQ was updated, there were about 150 subscribers, located
primarily in North America, as one might expect. Postings to the mailing
list are automatically archived.
The mailing list server itself is like most of those in use on the
Internet. If you're already familiar with Internet mailing lists, the
only thing you'll need to know is that the name of the server is
listserv@gsuvm1.gsu.edu -or- listserv@gsuvm1.bitnet
and the name of the mailing list itself is
nafips-l@gsuvm1.gsu.edu -or- nafips-l@gsuvm1.bitnet
Use the "gsuvm1.gsu.edu" addresses if you're on the Internet, and the
"gsuvm1.bitnet" addresses if you're on BITNET. If you're on some other
network, try to figure out which is "closer" to you, and use that one. If
you're not familiar with this type of mailing list server, the easiest
way to get started is to send the following message to
listserv@gsuvm1.gsu.edu:
help
You will receive a brief set of instructions by email within a short time.
Once you have subscribed, you will begin receiving a copy of each message
that is sent by anyone to nafips-l@gsuvm1.gsu.edu, and any message that
you send to that address will be sent to all of the other subscribers.
Technical University of Vienna Fuzzy Logic Mailing List:
This is a mailing list for the discussion of fuzzy logic and related
topics, located at the Technical University of Vienna in Austria. The
last time this FAQ was updated, there were about 420 subscribers.
The list is slightly moderated (only irrelevant mails are rejected)
and is two-way gatewayed to the aforementioned NAFIPS-L list and to
the comp.ai.fuzzy internet newsgroup. Messages should therefore be
sent only to one of the three media, although some mechanism for
mail-loop avoidance and duplicate-message avoidance is activated.
In addition to the mailing list itself, the list server gives
access to some files, including archives and the "Who is Who in Fuzzy
Logic" database that is currently under construction by Robert Fuller
<rfuller@finabo.abo.fi>.
Like many mailing lists, this one uses Anastasios Kotsikonas's LISTSERVER
system. If you've used this kind of server before, the only thing you'll
need to know is that the name of the server is
listserver@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
and the name of the mailing list is
fuzzy-mail@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
If you're not familiar with this type of mailing list server, the easiest
way to get started is to send the following message to
listserver@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at:
get fuzzy-mail info
You will receive a brief set of instructions by email within a short time.
Once you have subscribed, you will begin receiving a copy of each message
that is sent by anyone to fuzzy-mail@vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at, and any
message that you send to that address will be sent to all of the other
subscribers.
================================================================
Subject: [16] Bibliography
Date: 7-JUN-93
A list of books compiled by Josef Benedikt for the FLAI '93 (Fuzzy
Logic in Artificial Intelligence) conference's book exhibition is
available by anonymous ftp from ftp.cs.cmu.edu in the directory
/afs/cs.cmu.edu/project/ai-repository/ai/pubs/bibs/
as the file fuzzy-bib.text.
Non-Mathematical Works:
Kosko, Bart, "Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic", Warner, 1993
McNeill, Daniel, and Freiberger, Paul, "Fuzzy Logic", Simon and Schuster,
1992.
Negoita, C.V., "Fuzzy Systems", Abacus Press, Tunbridge-Wells, 1981.
Smithson, Michael, "Ignorance and Uncertainty: Emerging Paradigms",
Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988.
Brubaker, D.I., "Fuzzy-logic Basics: Intuitive Rules Replace Complex Math,"
EDN, June 18, 1992.
Schwartz, D.G. and Klir, G.J., "Fuzzy Logic Flowers in Japan," IEEE
Spectrum, July 1992.
Textbooks:
Dubois, Didier, and Prade, H., "Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and
Applications", Academic Press, New York, 1980.
Dubois, Didier, and Prade, Henri, "Possibility Theory", Plenum Press, New
York, 1988.
Goodman, I.R., and Nguyen, H.T., "Uncertainty Models for Knowledge-Based
Systems", North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.
Kandel, Abraham, "Fuzzy Mathematical Techniques with Applications",
Addison-Wesley, 1986.
Kandel, Abraham, and Lee, A., "Fuzzy Switching and Automata", Crane
Russak, New York, 1979.
Klir, George, and Folger, Tina, "Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and
Information", Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
Kosko, B., "Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems", Prentice Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ, 1992.
Toshiro Terano, Kiyoji Asai, and Michio Sugeno, "Fuzzy Systems Theory
and its Applications", Academic Press, 1992, 268 pages.
ISBN 0-12-685245-6. Translation of "Fajii shisutemu nyumon"
(Japanese, 1987).
Wang, Paul P., "Theory of Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications", Shanghai
Science and Technology, Shanghai, 1982.
Wang, Zhenyuan, and Klir, George J., "Fuzzy Measure Theory", Plenum
Press, New York, 1991.
Yager, R.R., (editor), "Fuzzy Sets and Applications", John Wiley
and Sons, New York, 1987.
Zimmerman, Hans J., "Fuzzy Set Theory", Kluwer, Boston, 2nd edition, 1991.
Anthologies:
Didier Dubois, Henri Prade, and Ronald R. Yager, editors, "Readings in
Fuzzy Systems", Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1992.
"A Quarter Century of Fuzzy Systems", Special Issue of the International
Journal of General Systems, 17(2-3), June 1990.
================================================================
Subject: [17] Journals and Technical Newsletters
Date: 24-AUG-93
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING (IJAR)
Official publication of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing
Society (NAFIPS).
Published 8 times annually. ISSN 0888-613X.
Subscriptions: Institutions $282, NAFIPS members $72 (plus $5 NAFIPS dues)
$36 mailing surcharge if outside North America.
For subscription information, write to David Reis, Elsevier Science
Publishing Company, Inc., 655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York
10010, call 212-633-3827, fax 212-633-3913, or send email to
74740.2600@compuserve.com.
Editor:
Piero Bonissone
Editor, Int'l J of Approx Reasoning (IJAR)
GE Corp R&D
Bldg K1 Rm 5C32A
PO Box 8
Schenectady, NY 12301 USA
Email: bonissone@crd.ge.com
Voice: 518-387-5155
Fax: 518-387-6845
Email: Bonissone@crd.ge.com
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS (IJFSS)
The official publication of the International Fuzzy Systems Association.
Subscriptions: Subscription is free to members of IFSA.
ISSN: 0165-0114
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
ISSN 1063-6706
Editor in Chief: James Bezdek
THE HUNTINGTON TECHNICAL BRIEF
Technical newsletter about fuzzy logic edited by Dr. Brubaker. It is
mailed monthly, is a single sheet, front and back, and rotates among
tutorials, descriptions of actual fuzzy applications, and discussions
(reviews, sort of) of existing fuzzy tools and products.
Subscriptions are $12 for an individual (paid by personal check),
$24 otherwise.
================================================================
Subject: [18] Professional Organizations
Date: 15-APR-93
INSTITUTION FOR FUZZY SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT CONTROL, INC.
Sponsors, organizes, and publishes the proceedings of the International
Fuzzy Systems and Intelligent Control Conference. The conference is
devoted primarily to computer based feedback control systems that rely on
rule bases, machine learning, and other artificial intelligence and soft
computing techniques. The theme of the 1993 conference was "Fuzzy Logic,
Neural Networks, and Soft Computing."
Thomas L. Ward
Institution for Fuzzy Systems and Intelligent Control, Inc.
P. O. Box 1297
Louisville KY 40201-1297 USA
Phone: +1.502.588.6342
Fax: +1.502.588.5633
Email: TLWard01@ulkyvm.louisville.edu, TLWard01@ulkyvm.bitnet
INTERNATIONAL FUZZY SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION (IFSA)
Holds biannual conferences that rotate between Asia, North America,
and Europe. Membership is $232, which includes a subscription to the
International Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems.
Prof. Philippe Smets
University of Brussels, IRIDIA
50 av. F. Roosevelt
CP 194/6
1050 Brussels, Belgium
LABORATORY FOR INTERNATIONAL FUZZY ENGINEERING (LIFE)
Laboratory for International Fuzzy Engineering Research
Siber Hegner Building 3FL
89-1 Yamashita-cho, Naka-ku
Yokohama-shi 231 Japan
Email: <name>@fuzzy.or.jp
NORTH AMERICAN FUZZY INFORMATION PROCESSING SOCIETY (NAFIPS)
Holds a conference and a workshop in alternating years.
President:
Dr. Jim Keller
President NAFIPS
Electrical & Computer Engineering Dept
University of Missouri-Col
Columbia, MO 65211 USA
Phone +1.314.882.7339
Email: ecejk@mizzou1.missouri.edu, ecejk@mizzou1.bitnet
Secretary/Treasurer:
Thomas H. Whalen
Sec'y/Treasurer NAFIPS
Decision Sciences Dept
Georgia State University
Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
Phone: +1.404.651.4080
Email: qmdthw@gsuvm1.gsu.edu, qmdthw@gsuvm1.bitnet
SPANISH ASSOCIATION FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY
Prof. J. L. Verdegay
Dept. of Computer Science and A.I.
Faculty of Sciences
University of Granada
18071 Granada (Spain)
Phone: +34.58.244019
Tele-fax: +34.58.243317, +34.58.274258
Email: jverdegay@ugr.es
================================================================
Subject: [19] Companies Supplying Fuzzy Tools
Date: 15-APR-93
Adaptive Informations Systems:
This is a new company that specializes in fuzzy information systems.
Main products of AIS:
- Consultancy and application development in fuzzy information retrieval
and flexible querying systems
- Development of a fuzzy querying application for value added network
services
- A fuzzy solution for utilization of a large (lexicon based)
terminological knowledge base for NL query evaluation
Adaptive Informations Systems
Hoestvej 8 B
DK-2800 Lyngby
Denmark
Phone: 45-4587-3217
Email: hll@dat.ruc.dk
American NeuraLogix:
Products:
NLX110 Fuzzy Pattern Comparator.
NLX230 8-bit single-chip fuzzy microcontroller.
NLX20xC 8- and 16-bit VLSI Core elements for fuzzy processing.
Others Other nonfuzzy and quasi-fuzzy devices.
[American NeuraLogix describes these chips and cores as "fuzzy"
processing devices, but as far as I can tell, they're not really
fuzzy. The NLX110 is a Hamming-distance calculator, and the
NLX230 and NLX20xC are based on a winner-take-all inference
strategy that discards most of the advantages of fuzzy expert
systems. Read the data sheets carefully before deciding.]
American NeuraLogix, Inc.
411 Central Park Drive
Sanford, FL 32771 USA
Phone: 407-322-5608
Fax: 407-322-5609
Aptronix:
Products:
Fide A MS Windows-hosted graphical development environment for
fuzzy expert systems. Code generators for Motorola's 6805,
68HC05, and 68HC11, and Omron's FP-3000 are available. A
demonstration version of Fide is available.
Aptronix, Inc.
2150 North First Street, Suite 300
San Jose, Ca. 95131 USA
Phone: 408-428-1888
Fax: 408-428-1884
Fuzzy Net BBS: 408-428-1883, 8/n/1
ByteCraft, Ltd.:
Products:
Fuzz-C "A C preprocessor for fuzzy logic" according to the cover of
its manual. Translates an extended C language to C source
code.
Byte Craft Limited
421 King Street North
Waterloo, Ontario
Canada N2J 4E4
Phone: 519-888-6911
Fax: 519-746-6751
Support BBS: 519-888-7626
Fujitsu:
Products:
MB94100 Single-chip 4-bit (?) fuzzy controller.
FuziWare:
Products:
FuziCalc An MS-Windows-based fuzzy development system based on a
spreadsheet view of fuzzy systems.
FuziWare, Inc.
316 Nancy Kynn Lane, Suite 10
Knoxville, Tn. 37919 USA
Phone: 800-472-6183, 615-588-4144
Fax: 615-588-9487
FuzzySoft AG:
Product:
FuzzySoft Fuzzy Logic Operating System runs under MS-Windows,
generates C-code, extended simulation capabalities.
Selling office for Germany, Switzerland and Austria (all product
inquiries should be directed here)
GTS Trautzl GmbbH
Gottlieb-Daimler-Str. 9
W-2358 Kaltenkirchen/Hamburg
Germany
Phone: (49) 4191 8711
Fax: (49) 4191 88665
Fuzzy Systems Engineering:
Products:
Manifold Editor ?
Manifold Graphics Editor ?
[These seem to be membership function & rulebase editors.]
Fuzzy Systems Engineering
P. O. Box 27390
San Diego, CA 92198 USA
Phone: 619-748-7384
Fax: 619-748-7384 (?)
HyperLogic, Inc.:
Products:
CubiCalc An MS-Windows-based fuzzy development environment.
CubiCalc RTC C source-code generator addon for CubiCalc.
HyperLogic Corp
1855 East Valley Parkway, Suite 210
P. O. Box 3751
Escondido, Ca. 92027 USA
Phone: 619-746-2765
Fax: 619-746-4089
Inform:
Products:
fuzzyTECH 3.0 A graphical fuzzy development environment. Versions
are available that generate either C source code or
Intel MCS-96 assembly source code as output. A
demonstration version is available. Runs under MS-DOS.
Inform Software Corp
1840 Oak Street, Suite 324
Evanston, Il. 60201 USA
Phone: 708-866-1838
INFORM GmbH
Geschaeftsbereich Fuzzy--Technologien
Pascalstraese 23
W-5100 Aachen
Tel: (02408) 6091
Fax: (02408) 6090
Metus Systems Group:
Products:
Metus Fuzzy Library A library of fuzzy processing routines for
C or C++. Source code is available.
The Metus Systems Group
1 Griggs Lane
Chappaqua, Ny. 10514 USA
Phone: 914-238-0647
Modico:
Products:
Fuzzle 1.8 A fuzzy development shell that generates either ANSI
FORTRAN or C source code.
Modico, Inc.
P. O. Box 8485
Knoxville, Tn. 37996 USA
Phone: 615-531-7008
Oki Electric:
Products:
MSM91U111 A single-chip 8-bit fuzzy controller.
Europe:
Oki Electric Europe GmbH.
Hellersbergstrasse 2
D-4040 Neuss, Germany
Phone: 49-2131-15960
Fax: 49-2131-103539
Hong Kong:
Oki Electronics (Hong Kong) Ltd.
Suite 1810-4, Tower 1
China Hong Kong City
33 Canton Road, Tsim Sha Tsui
Kowloon, Hong Kong
Phone: 3-7362336
Fax: 3-7362395
Japan:
Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.
Head Office Annex
7-5-25 Nishishinjuku
Shinjuku-ku Tokyo 160 JAPAN
Phone: 81-3-5386-8100
Fax: 81-3-5386-8110
USA:
Oki Semiconductor
785 North Mary Avenue
Sunnyvale, Ca. 94086 USA
Phone: 408-720-1900
Fax: 408-720-1918
OMRON Corporation:
Products:
C500-FZ001 Fuzzy logic processor module for Omron C-series PLCs.
E5AF Fuzzy process temperature controller.
FB-30AT FP-3000 based PC AT fuzzy inference board.
FP-1000 Digital fuzzy controller.
FP-3000 Single-chip 12-bit digital fuzzy controller.
FP-5000 Analog fuzzy controller.
FS-10AT PC-based software development environment for the
FP-3000.
Japan
Kazuaki Urasaki
Fuzzy Technology Business Promotion Center
OMRON Corporation
20 Igadera, Shimokaiinji
Nagaokakyo Shi, Kyoto 617 Japan
Phone: 81-075-951-5117
Fax: 81-075-952-0411
USA Sales (all product inquiries should be directed here)
Pat Murphy
OMRON Electronics, Inc.
One East Commerce Drive
Schaumburg, IL 60173 USA
Phone: 708-843-7900
Fax: 708-843-7787/8568
USA Research
Satoru Isaka
OMRON Advanced Systems, Inc.
3945 Freedom Circle, Suite 410
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Phone: 408-727-6644
Fax: 408-727-5540
Email: isaka@oas.omron.com
Togai InfraLogic, Inc.:
Togai InfraLogic (TIL for short) supplies software development tools,
board-, chip- and core-level fuzzy hardware, and engineering services.
Contact info@til.com for more detailed information.
Products:
FC110 (the FC110(tm) Digital Fuzzy Processor (DFP-tm)). An
8-bit microprocessor/coprocessor with fuzzy acceleration.
FC110DS (the FC110 Development System) A software development package
for the FC110 DFP, including an assembler, linker and Fuzzy
Programming Language (FPL-tm) compiler.
FCA VLSI Cores based on Fuzzy Computational Acceleration (FCA-tm).
FCA10AT FC110-based fuzzy accelerator board for PC/AT-compatibles.
FCA10VME FC110-based four-processor VME fuzzy accelerator.
FCD10SA FC110-based fuzzy processing module.
FCD10SBFC FC110-based single board fuzzy controller module.
FCD10SBus FC110-based two-processor SBus fuzzy accelerator.
FCDS (the Fuzzy-C Development System) An FPL compiler that emits
K&R or ANSI C source to implement the specified fuzzy system.
MicroFPL An FPL compiler and runtime module that support using fuzzy
techniques on small microcontrollers by several companies.
TILGen A tool for automatically constructing fuzzy expert systems from
sampled data.
TILShell+ A graphical development and simulation environment for fuzzy
systems.
USA
Togai InfraLogic, Inc.
5 Vanderbilt
Irvine, CA 92718 USA
Phone: 714-975-8522
Fax: 714-975-8524
Email: info@til.com
Toshiba:
Products:
T/FC150 10-bit fuzzy inference processor.
LFZY1 FC150-based NEC PC fuzzy logic board.
T/FT Fuzzy system development tool.
TransferTech GmbH:
Products:
Fuzzy Control Manager (FMC) Fuzzy shell, runs under MS-Windows
TransferTech GmbH.
Rebenring 33
W-3300 Braunschweig, Germany
Phone: 49-531-3801139
Fax: 49-531-3801152
================================================================
Subject: [20] Fuzzy Researchers
Date: 15-APR-93
This is a *partial* list of some of the researchers and research
organizations in the field of fuzzy logic and fuzzy expert systems.
Center for Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems Research (Texas A&M):
This group publishes a Technical Report Series, in addition to the
proceedings and video tapes of the first and second International Workshop
on Industrial Fuzzy Control and Intelligent Systems (IFIS 91/92).
Dr. John Yen
Center for Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems Research
Texas A&M University
MS 3112
Harvey R. Bright Building
Texas A&M University
College Station, TX 77843 USA
Phone: 409-845-5466
Fax: 409-847-8578
Email: cfl@cs.tamu.edu
German National Research Center for Computer Science (GMD):
The GMD supports a fuzzy logic group which does research in
- adaptive control
- VLSI design
- image processing
Liliane E. Peters
GMD-SET
P. O. Box 1316
D-5205 St. Augustin 1, Germany
Phone: 49-2241-14-2332
Fax: 49-2241-14-2342
Email: peters@borneo.gmd.de
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (SFIT):
Email: stegmaier@ifr.ethz.ch, vestli@ifr.ethz.ch
Tokyo Institute of Technology (TITech):
TITech's Department of Systems Science support Dr. Michio Sugeno's
laboratory, which does research in practical applications of fuzzy
logic and fuzzy expert systems.
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Department of Systems Science
4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku
Yokohama 227 Japan
Phone: 81-45-922-1111 x2641
Fax: 81-45-921-1485
Email: <name>@sys.titech.ac.jp
[According to Dr. Michael Griffin (griffin@sys.titech.ac.jp),
"Don't bother sending e-mail to Professor M. Sugeno, he doesn't use it."]
================================================================
;;; *EOF*