home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
021891
/
0218610.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
4KB
|
91 lines
<text id=91TT0372>
<title>
Feb. 18, 1991: More Spongtaneous Eruptions
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
Feb. 18, 1991 The War Comes Home
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
RELIGION, Page 62
More Spongtaneous Eruptions
</hdr><body>
<p>An Episcopal bishop's unorthodoxy reaches epic proportions
</p>
<p> Jesus Christ, as portrayed in some New Testament passages,
is "narrow-minded" and "vindictive." The Gospel writers
"twisted" the facts concerning Jesus' resurrection, which was
never meant to be taken literally. The virgin birth of Christ
is an unthinkable notion, and there is not much value in the
doctrine of the Trinity, or in the belief that Jesus Christ was
sent to save fallen humanity from sin. St. Paul, the missionary
of Christianity to the Gentiles, was a repressed and
"self-loathing" homosexual. As for the Old Testament, it
contains a "vicious tribal code of ethics" attributed to a
"sadistic" God. The idea that Yahweh bestowed the Promised Land
upon the Israelites is "arrogance."
</p>
<p> Excerpts from a tract by a staunch atheist? On the contrary,
those are assertions offered by a bishop of America's Episcopal
Church, John Spong of Newark, in his new book, Rescuing the
Bible from Fundamentalism (Harper San Francisco, $16.95).
Spong's unorthodoxy is of long standing, but it has now reached
epic proportions. His previous book, Living in Sin?, assailed
Christian dos and don'ts on sex and asserted that nonmarital
sex can be holy under some circumstances. After the work
appeared in 1988, Spong ordained a sexually active gay priest,
inspiring the Episcopal House of Bishops to "disassociate"
itself from Spong's action.
</p>
<p> The provocative prelate also has Roman Catholics fuming. A
task force in his Newark diocese has just declared that
Catholicism's view of women is "so insulting, so retrograde
that we can respond only by saying that women should, for the
sake of their own humanity, leave that communion." Spong
handpicked the panel, and offers no particular criticism of its
assertions, though he says he might have employed milder
language. Newark's Catholic Archbishop, Theodore McCarrick, has
decried the "offensive attacks" on Catholicism.
</p>
<p> In Rescuing the Bible, Spong brands traditional Catholicism
as a "destructive" creed. But he is even more offended by
conservative Protestants who take a literal view of biblical
exegesis. Spong, 59, held similar beliefs in his boyhood as a
practicing Presbyterian, and has admitted that Fundamentalism
gave him a "love of Scripture that is no longer present in the
liberal tradition of the church." In taking aim at literalism,
Spong declares his goal is to reveal the spiritual truths
underlying the biblical text. Still, his book lashes out both
at the conservative view of the Bible and at its adherents, who
are, Spong says, consumed by "enormous fear" of doctrinal
uncertainty.
</p>
<p> Spong's wildly offbeat convictions raise an intriguing
question: Are there any limits to what an Episcopal leader may
believe--or disbelieve? His Paul-was-gay argument, based
tenuously upon the Apostle's unmarried state and frequently
mentioned sense of personal sin, is causing a growing uproar
among traditionalists. But conservative Bishop William Frey,
president of Pennsylvania's Trinity Episcopal School for
Ministry, doubts any decisive stand will be taken by the church
against his colleague's writings. "The House of Bishops has
shown itself to be impotent in the face of challenges to the
core beliefs of the church," Frey says. "We've been paralyzed
by our politeness."
</p>
<p> Los Angeles Bishop Frederick Borsch, who chairs the
hierarchy's theology committee (on which Spong sits), explains
that "we are not a confessional church that tries to write a
definition of orthodoxy. A lot of us would defend this as the
genius of Episcopalianism." Spong's latest work, however,
leaves the genius somewhat embattled.
</p>
<p>By Richard N. Ostling. Reported by Michael P. Harris/Newark.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>