home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
031191
/
0311992.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-15
|
28KB
|
538 lines
<text id=91TT0528>
<link 93XV0036>
<link 93TO0080>
<link 93TG0139>
<link 93TG0113>
<link 91TT0536>
<link 91TT0495>
<link 91TT0115>
<title>
Mar. 11, 1991: The 100 Hours
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991 Highlights
The Persian Gulf War:Desert Storm
</history>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
Mar. 11, 1991 Kuwait City:Feb. 27, 1991
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE GULF WAR, Page 22
THE BATTLEGROUND
The 100 Hours
</hdr><body>
<p>In a battle for the history books, the allies break the Iraqi
army -- quickly, totally and at unbelievably low cost
</p>
<p>By GEORGE J. CHURCH -- Reported by William Dowell/Kuwait City,
Bruce van Voorst/Washington and Robert T. Zintl/Riyadh
</p>
<p> The most stunning, overwhelming victory in war is a
beginning as well as an end. Diplomatic problems will persist
long after the burned-out hulks of Iraqi tanks and the bodies
strewn across the cratered battlefield are buried by sand.
Political dangers will explode after the last of thousands of
mines are dug up. Psychological reverberations will be felt
when the final echoes of cheers for the victors have died away.
</p>
<p> Saddam Hussein remains in power, at least for the moment,
shorn of the military might that made him a menace but not of
all capacity for troublemaking. Containing him may require not
only a long-lasting arms embargo but also some sort of regional
security scheme. Kuwait is liberated, but a smoldering wreck
needing perhaps years of reconstruction. Then come the broader
difficulties: trying to forge a stable regional balance of
power -- or balance of weakness, as some commentators suggest
-- and defuse the hatreds that have made the Middle East the
world's most prolific breeding ground for war. French President
Francois Mitterrand ticks off a laundry list of regional
troubles that must be addressed: "The Arab-Israeli conflict,
the Palestinian problem, the problem of Lebanon, the control
of weapons sales, disarmament, redistribution of resources,
reconstruction of countries hit by the war."
</p>
<p> The U.S. emerges with new power and credibility; any pledge
it makes to defend an ally or oppose an aggressor means far
more than such a promise would have meant prior to Jan. 15. But
the U.S. also urgently needs to define George Bush's vision of
a new world order. To what extent is America ready to assume
the role of world policeman? More specifically, under what
circumstances might it -- and some of its allies -- again mount
a military effort comparable to the one in the gulf? Certainly
that cannot be done in response to every case of aggression
anywhere, but how does Washington pick and choose? What kind
of relationship can it forge with the Soviet Union, which gave
crucial support to the anti-Saddam coalition but also served
brief notice, in its efforts to mediate a political settlement,
that ultimately it will follow its own interests?
</p>
<p> Among Americans, the war has finally laid to rest all the
ghosts of Vietnam. Self-doubt, deep divisions, suspicions of
national decline -- the very words suddenly seem quaint. The
problem now may be to contain the surge of pride and unity
before it bursts the bounds of reason and passes into jingoism,
even hubris.
</p>
<p> None of that, however, can detract from the awesome speed,
power and totality of the allies' military victory. The war,
particularly its climactic 100-hour campaign, bids fair to be
enshrined in military textbooks for as long as the annihilation
of a Roman army by Hannibal at the battle of Cannae in 216 B.C.
That is still a model for a strategy of encirclement, like the
one followed by General H. Norman Schwarzkopf, the allied
commander in the gulf.
</p>
<p> The war as a whole might be the most one-sided in all
history, as indicated by the casualty figures. Latest count for
the full 43 days: 149 killed and 513 wounded among the allies,
vs. perhaps more than 100,000 deaths and injuries among the
Iraqis, though an accurate total may never be known. The
conflict challenged a whole series of military shibboleths:
generals always refight the last war (Saddam in fact planned
a rerun of the 1980-88 war with Iran, but allied strategy and
tactics bore no resemblance to Vietnam or Korea); air power
alone cannot win a war (maybe not, but it destroyed up to 75%
of the fighting capacity of Iraq's front-line troops in
Kuwait, making the remainder a pushover); an attacking army
needs at least a 3-to-1 superiority in numbers over a defending
force, maybe 5-to-1 if the defenders are well dug in (allied
forces routed and slaughtered, by a combination of firepower,
speed and deception, Iraqi troops that outnumbered them at
least 3 to 2 and were extremely well dug in).
</p>
<p> Another shibboleth is that no battle ever goes totally
according to plan. The final land campaign, however, may become
the classic example of a battle in which everything happened
exactly as planned, on the allied side -- except faster and
better.
</p>
<p> Even before the ground campaign began, the war had been won
to a greater extent than allied commanders would let themselves
hope. It was known that five weeks of bombing had destroyed
much of the Iraqis' armor and artillery. But not until
coalition soldiers could see the corpses piled in Iraqi
trenches and hear surrendering soldiers' tales of starvation
and terror did it become obvious how bloodily effective the air
campaign had been. One of the key questions about the bombing
was how much it had disrupted Iraqi command and communications.
The damage turned out to be almost total. Iraqi troops could
not communicate even with adjoining companies and battalions;
they fought, when they did fight, in isolated actions rather
than as part of a coordinated force. One unit of the Republican
Guard was caught and devastated on the war's last day while its
members were taking a cigarette break; comrades in surrounding
units had been unable to warn them that onrushing American
forces were almost on top of them.
</p>
<p> Bereft of satellites or even aerial reconnaissance, Saddam's
commanders could not see what was going on behind allied lines.
Thus Schwarzkopf was able to hoodwink Baghdad into
concentrating its forces in the wrong places until the very
end. Six of Iraq's 42 divisions were massed along the Kuwaiti
coast, guarding against a seaborne invasion. U.S. Marines
repeatedly practiced amphibious landings, as conspicuously as
possible, and as zero hour approached, an armada of 31 ships
swung into position to put them ashore near Kuwait City. The
battleships Missouri and Wisconsin took turns, an hour at a
time, firing their 16-in. guns at Iraqi shore defenses. It was
all a feint; the war ended with 17,000 Marines still aboard
their ships.
</p>
<p> Most of Iraq's front-line troops hunkered down behind
minefields and barbed wire along the 138-mile Saudi-Kuwait
border, awaiting what Baghdad obviously expected to be the main
allied thrust. Coalition troops did in fact initially
concentrate in front of them. But in the last 16 days before
the attack, more than 150,000 American, British and French
troops moved to the west, as far as 300 miles inland from the
gulf, setting up bases across the border from an area of
southern Iraq that was mostly empty desert. Part of that allied
force was to drive straight to the Euphrates River, cutting off
retreat routes for the Iraqi forces in Kuwait; another part was
to turn east and hit Republican Guard divisions along the
Kuwait-Iraq border, taking them by surprise on their right
flank.
</p>
<p> The battle plan did call as well, however, for narrowly
focused thrusts through the main Iraqi defensive works.
Concerned that his troops would get caught in breaches and
slaughtered by massed Iraqi artillery firing poison-gas shells,
Schwarzkopf ordered a shift in the bombing campaign during the
last week to concentrate heavily on knocking out the frontline
big guns. The planes succeeded spectacularly, destroying so
much Iraqi artillery that its fire was never either as heavy or
as accurate as had been feared. Also in the last week,
special-operations commandos expanded their activities deep in
Iraqi territory. Many additional units landed by helicopter,
checking out the lay of the land and fixing Iraqi troop, tank
and artillery positions so they could guide both air strikes
and, later, advancing ground units.
</p>
<p> Schwarzkopf had initially got Washington's agreement to Feb.
21 as the day to begin the ground assault. But some
subordinates thought they needed two more days to get ready.
So he and George Bush fixed 8 p.m. Saturday, Feb. 23 -- noon
in Washington -- as zero hour, and Bush made that the
expiration time of a final ultimatum to Saddam. As the deadline
approached, tanks equipped with bulldozer blades cut wide
openings through the sand berms Saddam's soldiers had erected
as a defensive wall along the border, and tanks and troops
began pushing through on probing attacks; some were across
hours before the deadline.
</p>
<p> During the night, B-52s pounded Iraqi positions and
helicopter gunships swept the defense lines, firing rockets at
tanks and artillery pieces and machine-gunning soldiers in the
trenches. Allied artillery opened an intense bombardment from
howitzers and multiple-launch rocket systems that released
thousands of shrapnel-like bomblets over the trenches.
Everything was ready for the ground troops to begin moving in
the last hours of darkness, taking advantage of the allies'
superior night-vision equipment.
</p>
<p> SUNDAY: THROUGH THE BREACH
</p>
<p> Between 4 a.m. and 6 a.m., allied forces jumped off at
selected points all along the 300-mile line. Though Hollywood
has long pictured the desert as a place of eternal burning
sunshine and total aridity, the attack began in a lashing rain
that turned the sand into muddy goo. The first troops through
were wearing bulky chemical-protective garb, in keeping with
the allied conviction that Saddam would use poison gas right
from the beginning. In fact, the Iraqis never fired their
chemical weapons.
</p>
<p> Saudi and other Arab troops hit the strongest Iraqi
fortifications near the coast. To their left were the U.S. 1st
and 2nd Marine divisions, which had moved inland. The Marines
attacked at points known to allied commanders as the "elbow"
of Kuwait, where the border with Saudi Arabia turns sharply to
the north, and the "armpit," where it abruptly sweeps west
again. They were led in person by Lieut. General Walter Boomer,
the top Marine in the gulf area, according to operational plans
he had forwarded only 16 days earlier to the Pentagon, where
they caused raised eyebrows because of their audacity. But they
worked.
</p>
<p> The allied troops had built in Saudi Arabia sand berms and
replicas of the other Iraqi entrenchments and practiced
breaching them until they could virtually do it blindfolded.
Among the tactics: Remotely piloted vehicles, or pilotless
drone planes, guided soldiers to the most thinly held spots in
the Iraqi lines. Line charges, or 100-yd.-long strings of
tubing laced with explosives, blasted paths through minefields.
Tanks and armored personnel carriers drove through those paths
in long, narrow files, observing strict radio silence. Their
drivers communicated by hand signals -- even in the dark, when
night-vision devices worked perfectly.
</p>
<p> Much had been written about the inferno the Iraqis would
create by filling trenches with burning oil. But in the
Marines' sector, U.S. planes had burned off the oil prematurely
by dropping napalm. The Saudis did encounter trenches filled
with blazing petroleum and in some cases with water, but
crossed them by the simple expedient of having bulldozers and
tanks fitted with earth-moving blades collapse dirt into the
trenches until they were filled. It took only hours for the
allied troops to burst through the supposedly impregnable Iraqi
defenses and begin a war of maneuvers, sweeping right past some
of the heaviest concentrations of troops and armor, and calling
in withering air strikes and tank and artillery fire on those
that fought. Throughout the 100-hour campaign, the allied
soldiers avoided hand-to-hand fighting wherever possible,
preferring to stand off and blast away at their foes at more
than arm's length.
</p>
<p> At the far western reach of the allied line, the French 6th
Light Armored Division jumped off before dawn Sunday, attacking
across the Iraqi border with the U.S. 82nd Airborne Division
toward a fort and airfield named As Salman, 105 miles inside
Iraq. On the way, American artillery and French Gazelle
helicopter gunships firing HOT antitank missiles subdued a
force of Iraqi tanks and infantry, many of whom surrendered.
</p>
<p> To the right of the French, the U.S. 101st Airborne Division
mounted a deep-penetration helicopter assault into southeastern
Iraq. Chinook helicopters, some skimming only 50 feet above the
sand, others slinging Humvees, modern versions of the old
jeeps, below their fuselages, ferried 4,000 men with their
vehicles and equipment into the desert. The force established
a huge refueling and resupply base, then jumped off again from
there deeper into Iraq and struck out for the Euphrates River.
Other units -- the British 1st Armored Division, seven U.S.
Army divisions, and Egyptian, Saudi and Syrian units -- attacked
at various times throughout the morning and early afternoon
at points along the Saudi-Iraq border into the western tip of
Kuwait. All moved fast and attained their most ambitious
objectives. The 1st Marine Division, for example, by Sunday
night had reached al-Jaber airport, half the 40-mile distance
from the Saudi border to Kuwait City.
</p>
<p> MONDAY: SPEEDING UP
</p>
<p> Nearly all units continued moving at rapid rates: the Saudis
and U.S. Marines in Kuwait toward the north; American Army
units toward the Euphrates; British, other American, Egyptian
and Syrian forces to the east. The French, having taken As
Salman in 36 hours, stopped at midday on Schwarzkopf's orders
to set up a defensive position guarding the units to their
right against any Iraqi attack from the west.
</p>
<p> Mass surrenders began almost with the first breaches of the
Iraqi lines Sunday and by Tuesday had reached 30,000; the
allied command stopped counting then. By war's end the number
had easily passed 100,000. They came out of collapsed bunkers,
waving handkerchiefs, underwear, anything that was white.
Everyone on the allied side had a favorite surrender story.
</p>
<p> Two striking ones: about 40 Iraqis tried to surrender to an
RPV, turning round and round, waving their arms as the
pilotless drone circled above. An Iraqi tank and another
armored vehicle bore down on a U.S. Humvee driven by a lone
soldier and stuck helplessly in mud. The Iraqi vehicles pulled
the Humvee out of the mire; then their crews surrendered to its
driver.
</p>
<p> Schwarzkopf was careful to state that the mass surrenders
did not necessarily mean the Iraqis were poor fighters. Most,
he noted, had no belief in what they were doing and did not
regard holding on to Kuwait as a cause worth dying for. They
were starved, thirsty, often sick -- medical care was atrocious
to nonexistent -- and some had been terrorized by their own
commanders, who employed roving execution squads to shoot or
hang troopers who had attempted to desert or defect. That
barbaric method of keeping discipline backfired: soldiers gave
themselves up as soon as the guns pointing at them were
American, British or Arab.
</p>
<p> Baghdad radio on Monday broadcast an order, supposedly from
Saddam, for his forces to withdraw from Kuwait; many complied
with alacrity. Those who paused to fight were often cut to
pieces. On Monday afternoon, for example, the 1st Marine
Division encountered Iraqi units in the Burgan oil field near
Kuwait International Airport and flushed them out with "time
on target" fire, the opposite of a rolling barrage: all guns
in the entire division opened up at the same time to lay down
a devastating curtain of explosives on the same limited target
area. That forced the Iraqis out of the oil field. Emerging
into the open, they were hit with more fire from artillery,
Cobra attack helicopters and Marine tanks. Some 50 to 60 Iraqi
tanks were reported destroyed in this brief engagement. Marine
losses: zero.
</p>
<p> Oddly, though, this day of burgeoning victory brought the
one U.S. tragedy of the war. An Iraqi Scud missile heading for
Saudi Arabia broke up in flight: the warhead plunged onto an
American barracks near the huge base at Dhahran. The blast
killed 28 soldiers, causing in an eye blink almost a third of
all American battle deaths in the entire war. An additional 90
soldiers were injured, many seriously.
</p>
<p> TUESDAY: BUGGING OUT
</p>
<p> Residents of Kuwait City awoke to the sound of tank engines
revving up. The Iraqis were pulling out, sparing the city, its
inhabitants, and the allied forces closing in the agonies of
house-to-house fighting. By afternoon Kuwaiti resistance
fighters said they were in control of the city, though sniper
fire continued for a while and Saudi and Kuwaiti troops did not
stage their victory parade into the city until the following
day.
</p>
<p> Outside the city, said a U.S. briefing officer, "the whole
country is full of people escaping and evading." Though some
allied commanders described the Iraqi pullback as an orderly
fighting retreat, at times it looked like a pell-mell bugout.
Roads leading north toward the Iraqi city of Basra, military
headquarters for the Kuwait theater, were so jammed with
vehicles and troops that a pilot from the carrier U.S.S. Ranger
in the gulf said it looked like "the road to Daytona Beach at
spring break." Allied bombing of roads and bridges had created
bottlenecks from which mammoth traffic jams backed up, making
for still more inviting targets. So many allied planes
converged on the main road from Kuwait City to Basra that
combat air controllers feared they might collide, and diverted
some of the attackers to secondary roads.
</p>
<p> Pilots flying off the Ranger were so eager to refuel and get
back into the air to kill more tanks that they had their planes
loaded with whatever bombs or missiles happened to be available
on the flight deck, rather than waiting for the ship's slow
elevators to bring up ordnance specifically chosen for their
mission. Pilot after pilot described attacks in which, after
the first tank in a column was hit, the crews would abandon the
others and set out on foot for home. Correspondents touring the
road at week's end found mile after mile of blasted, twisted,
burned, shattered tanks, trucks and other vehicles, many still
incongruously carrying loot from Kuwait City: children's toys,
carpets, television sets. Those Iraqi soldiers who reached the
Euphrates threw up pontoon bridges to replace sturdier spans
that had been destroyed by bombing; when more bombs wrecked the
pontoon bridges too, some desperate troops crossed by walking
along earthen dams.
</p>
<p> WEDNESDAY: CLOSING THE RING
</p>
<p> Some allied units had reached the Euphrates as early as
Monday; by Wednesday morning they were established in enough
force to prevent further crossings. British units cut the main
Kuwait City-Basra highway early in the day; American Marines
had reached it farther to the south the previous afternoon. The
gate had slammed shut on Saddam's forces in Kuwait. Their
escape routes were broken. Encirclement was complete.
</p>
<p> The day was dominated by the two big tank battles of the
war. U.S. Marines ran into a major Iraqi armored force at
Kuwait International Airport. The sky was so dark because of
the heavy smoke from oil wells set afire by the Iraqis that
Marine Major General Michael Myatt had to read a map by
flashlight. The Marines nonetheless resumed the battle by what
light there was, and late in the day reported having destroyed
all 100 Iraqi tanks they had engaged.
</p>
<p> In a far bigger clash along the Kuwait-Iraq border, American
and British troops pushing eastward after their flanking
maneuver through the desert finally broke the Republican Guard.
Schwarzkopf had defined these troops as the "center of gravity"
of the Iraqi forces. Said a senior Army staff officer: "The
whole campaign was designed on one theme: to destroy the
Republican Guard."
</p>
<p> British troops encountered some Guard units as early as
Monday night, destroying a third of their armor at the first
blow with long-range artillery fire and aerial attack. Fighting
between American troops and Guard units also began Monday and
steadily intensified; by nightfall Monday a briefer reported
one of the Guard's seven divisions in the area rendered
"basically ineffective." The big battle raged all day
Wednesday. Some allied officers reported that the Guard fought
about as well as could have been expected of troops battling
without air cover, with minimal, if any, communications and
under relentless allied bombing. But one American officer
asserted that "basically we are chasing them across the plains,
shooting as we go."
</p>
<p> The Guard fared no better than other Iraqi units. Not only
was allied air power unchallenged and decisive; U.S. M1A1 tanks
proved superior in maneuverability and firepower to Iraq's
best, the Soviet-built T-72s. One correspondent witnessed a
duel between an M1A1 and a T-72. When they sighted each other,
the American tank backed up, outside the T-72's range. The
Iraqi tank fired a round that fell short. The M1A1 fired its
longer-range cannon, scoring a direct hit that put the Iraqi
tank out of action, then promptly swiveled and went looking for
another victim.
</p>
<p> By Wednesday evening Schwarzkopf, in a masterly briefing on
the war about to end, began by saying that Iraq had lost more
than 3,000 of the 4,700 tanks it had deployed in the Kuwait
theater at the start of the war -- then added, "As a matter of
fact, you can add 700 to that as a result of the battle that's
going on right now with the Republican Guard." Saddam's forces
lost similarly high proportions of their other armored
vehicles, artillery and trucks. The result, said Schwarzkopf,
was that Iraq was left with only an infantry army, no longer
capable of offensive operations and therefore not a threat to
other countries in the region. That fulfilled one of the two
principal allied war aims; the other, clearing Iraq out of
Kuwait, was just about accomplished as well. The war was as
good as over.
</p>
<p> THURSDAY: VICTORY
</p>
<p> In a few more hours, the shooting officially ended. At 5
a.m. (9 p.m. Wednesday in Washington) Bush went on the air to
announce that he was ordering a suspension of all offensive
action, to take effect three hours later. Since it was a
unilateral action rather than an agreement negotiated with the
Iraqis, it was not officially a cease-fire, but it had the same
result. Shooting in fact stopped at 8 a.m., and only sporadic
incidents broke the silence as the weekend began. Some Iraqi
units appeared not to get the word at first; allied troops set
up loudspeakers blaring over and over again the message in
Arabic that Iraqis would no longer be attacked if they held
their fire. A warning to those that did not: on Saturday, a
column of 140 Iraqi tanks and other armored vehicles ran into
a U.S. force and began shooting. The Americans counterattacked
with tank and helicopter fire, destroying 60 Iraqi vehicles and
capturing the other 80.
</p>
<p> The task of negotiating an official end to the battle was
only beginning. Iraq designated a representative to meet with
Schwarzkopf's officers and work out terms of a permanent
cease-fire, but that was no simple task. The allies were
pressing for a swift exchange of prisoners, but did that
include the Kuwaiti civilians -- as many as 40,000 -- believed
to have been carried into Iraq by Saddam's retreating forces?
And what would the coalition do with the many Iraqi prisoners
who feared, with reason, that they might be shot if they went
home? Should Saddam's forces be allowed to take out of Kuwait
what heavy equipment they had left, or must they leave it
behind as spoils of war?
</p>
<p> Long-range planning began too. U.S. and British officials
intended to begin some token withdrawals of troops from the
gulf as early as this week, but Americans warned that bringing
all the forces home might take longer than the seven months
that had been required to complete the buildup. Most will have
to stay on until some permanent peacekeeping arrangements can
be forged. U.S. Secretary of State James Baker prepared to set
out on a swing through the Middle East this week, including his
first visit ever to Israel, to scout the possibilities for a
wider regional settlement.
</p>
<p> Postmortems had already begun. Baghdad Radio claimed that
Iraq had won but could give no rationale except some mumblings
about spirit. In Moscow generals hastened to proclaim that the
destruction of Iraq's mostly Soviet-built equipment said more
about the deficiencies of the Iraqi military than the quality
of the weapons. Some of them hinnted, however, tat Soviet cuts
in military spending, if carried much further, might begin to
weaken the nation's defenses against the demonstrated
proficiency of Western high-tech weaponry.
</p>
<p> On the allied side, Schwarzkopf seemed right in terming the
coalition's ability to achieve nearly total success with so few
losses "almost miraculous." Not only were the pessimists and
skeptics wrong, including all those who had said the aerial
bombing was going badly, but the optimists were far off the
mark too. American casualties were less than 5% of the lowest
prewar Pentagon estimates. U.S. forces had prepared about
10,000 beds, aboard ships and in three field hospitals, to
receive the wounded; only a tiny fraction were filled.
</p>
<p> Such overwhelming success, in fact, may be unrepeatable. The
U.S. and its partners are unlikely to face soon, or ever,
another combination of a cause so clear that it unites a mighty
coalition; ideal terrain for high-tech warfare; a dispirited
and war-weary enemy army; an almost total lack of opposition
in the air; and an adversary, Saddam, who made nearly every
blunder in the book.
</p>
<p>____________________________________________________________
BUSH'S DEMANDS
</p>
<p> After halting allied assaults, the President required that
Iraq:
</p>
<p> -- Release immediately all prisoners of war, third-country
nationals and the remains of all who died in Iraqi hands.
</p>
<p> -- Release all Kuwaiti detainees.
</p>
<p> -- Inform authorities in Kuwait of the location and nature
of all land and sea mines planted there.
</p>
<p> -- Comply fully with all relevant U.N. resolutions. These
include a rescinding of Iraq's annexation of Kuwait and
acceptance of responsibility for all financial losses resulting
from its invasion.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>