home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
052190
/
0521640.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-29
|
7KB
|
142 lines
<text id=90TT1352>
<title>
May 21, 1990: In Praise Of Low Voter Turnout
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
May 21, 1990 John Sununu:Bush's Bad Cop
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
ESSAY, Page 88
In Praise of Low Voter Turnout
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By Charles Krauthammer
</p>
<p> Washington, it seems, is a city in decline. History has
taken up residence in Budapest and Tokyo, Brussels and Seoul.
After a brief spurt of prominence and wealth owed to the
Depression, Hitler and the cold war, Washington, we are told,
has lapsed into a somnambular state.
</p>
<p> This is an exaggeration, but not too far from the truth.
Government has grown huge, and a presidential hiccup can still
panic the stock market, but Washington has far less impact on
the direction of America and the world than it did a generation
ago.
</p>
<p> The marginalization of Washington is sometimes taken as
proof of American decline. Nonsense. With the implosion of its
only superpower rival, America stands alone in the world, its
relative power--which the decline theorists insist is the
only relevant measure--unsurpassed. (One reason, for example,
that hostages are being released is that the thug regimes of
the world realize that suddenly there is only one superpower
left and they had better warm up to it.)
</p>
<p> The marginalization of Washington reflects not the decline
of America but the decline of politics. In the West--and it
is soon to be true in the East, now that they've got the easy
part, revolution, out of the way--history is not made by
politics. It is made by economics, by demographics and, above
all, by science and technology. Politics lubricates, corrupts
mildly and takes a slice of the action. But it does not create
new worlds as it did, horribly, in 1917 and 1933 and,
blessedly, in 1946-49 when the U.S. established the structures
of the postwar world. Politics has become, like much of life,
maintenance. The house is built; Republicans and Democrats
argue now over who is to repair the roof and how to pay for it.
</p>
<p> Moreover, the great political debates are over. The romance
with isms, with the secular religions of socialism,
egalitarianism and totalitarianism, is dead. The fierce battles
over whether, for example, the U.S. should lead the crusade
against communism are finished too. American politics is no
longer about bearing any burden in defense of liberty. American
politics is about the Clean Air Act.
</p>
<p> This is not to deride clean air. Clean air is important, and
the clean air bill now working its way through Congress is a
quite satisfying triumph of democratic compromise,
smog-producing Detroit working out with smog-ingesting Los
Angeles a political arrangement that the whole country can live
with. But the great dichotomies of war and peace, left and
right, good and evil are gone. Politicians still try to use
these categories to carry the fight, but no one believes them.
</p>
<p> This triumph of apolitical bourgeois democracy has been a
source of dismay to some. They pine for the heroic age when
great ideologies clashed and the life of nations turned on a
vote in Congress. On the contrary. I couldn't be happier that
the political century is over, and that all that's left is to
shuffle cards on the cruise ship. The great disease of the 20th
century was the politicization of life. The totalitarians, left
and right, showed the way, politicizing everything: economics,
education, art, religion, family life. Not even genetics could
escape politics. One remembers with disbelief not just Hitler's
eugenic lunacies but also Stalin's designation of Lysenko's
crackpot genetics as official truth, enforced by secret police.
</p>
<p> After such a century, it is a form of salvation, of social
health, for politics to be in acute and precipitous decline.
As a Portuguese ex-leftist said of his country's recent
renaissance, "Portugal's success is that its politics no longer
dominate everything."
</p>
<p> At its headiest, the aim of 20th century politics was the
transformation of man and society by means of power. This great
project--politics as redemption--has ended in failure on
a breathtaking scale: not just economic and political but also
ecological, spiritual and, not surprising for an enterprise of
such overweening hubris, moral. The deeper meaning of the
overthrow of communism is the realization that man can shape
neither history nor society by Five-Year Plans, and that
attempts to contradict this truth must end in the grotesque.
The revulsion with politics reflects the view that when
politicians go about tinkering with something as organic as a
poor family or a rural community by means of a federal welfare
program or an enormous dam, the law of unintended consequences
prevails.
</p>
<p> George Bush's great good fortune is that he is a man utterly
incapable of vision at a time when the people do not want
vision and do not need it. Vision is for Khomeini and Castro,
for Jesse Jackson and Pat Robertson. Happily, if only for now,
Americans will have none of it.
</p>
<p> Which is why when almost every pundit wrings his hands in
despair at low voter turnout--some even feel obliged to
propose creative schemes to induce people to vote--I am left
totally unmoved. Low voter turnout means that people see
politics as quite marginal to their lives, as neither salvation
nor ruin. That is healthy. Low voter turnout is a leading
indicator of contentment. For a country founded on the notion
that that government is best that governs least, it seems
entirely proper that Americans should in large numbers register
a preference against politics by staying home on Election Day.
</p>
<p> A few weeks ago, a producer from public television came to
ask my advice about planning coverage for the 1992 elections.
Toward the end, she raised a special problem: how to get young
adults interested in political coverage. I offered the opinion
that 19-year-olds who sit in front of a television watching
politics could use professional help. At that age they should
be playing ball and looking for a date. They'll have time
enough at my age to worry about the mortgage and choosing a
candidate on the basis of his views on monetary policy.
</p>
<p> To say that, of course, is to violate current League of
Women Voters standards of good citizenship. Let others struggle
valiantly to raise the political awareness of all citizens. Let
them rage against the tides of indifference. They will fail,
and when they do, relax. Remember that indifference to politics
leaves all the more room for the things that really count:
science, art, religion, family and play.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>