home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT1413>
- <title>
- June 22, 1992: Reviews:Theater
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- June 22, 1992 Allergies
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEW, Page 72
- THEATER
- Made Glorious Summer
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By WILLIAM A. HENRY III
- </p>
- <p> TITLE: Richard III
- AUTHOR: William Shakespeare
- WHERE: Brooklyn Academy of Music
- </p>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: A brilliant actor and director find, in
- a tragedy about the 15th century, relevance for the 20th.
- </p>
- <p> From the moment he appears onstage, uniformed and martial,
- barking out "Now is the winter of our discontent" with the
- guttural fury of a drill sergeant, Sir Ian McKellen's Richard
- III is arrestingly cruel and humorless, all chill and absolutely
- no charm. Not for him the leisurely glories of the play's
- language or the seductions of direct address and droll comedy
- to woo an audience. In a role that can epitomize the concept of
- the villain one loves to hate, McKellen avoids anything lovable
- or even approachable. This production, which has won raves from
- London to Cairo to Tokyo and which opened a 16-week, six-city
- U.S. tour last week, is an unrelenting portrait of the rise of
- a dictator, assailing equally the tyrant and the rapacious
- society that bred him.
- </p>
- <p> The show, produced by Britain's Royal National Theater and
- staged by its artistic director, Richard Eyre, is modernish --
- 1930s -- in its dress and visual vocabulary. It is meant to
- evoke 20th century memories ranging from Oswald Mosley's English
- fascists to the Ceausescu and Marcos regimes. Yet it is entirely
- faithful to the politics and psychology of Shakespeare's text.
- No production in memory has better evoked the terrifying
- instability of this buccaneer world. Rather than the embodiment
- of motiveless malignity, Richard is simply a skillful and
- ruthless practitioner of the techniques of his backstabbing
- times. While invested by McKellen with all the understandable
- self-pity of a man whose mother reviled him from birth for his
- physical deformities and who contemplates death in the certainty
- that no living creature will mourn him, this Richard is no less
- reprehensible for being comprehensible.
- </p>
- <p> Eyre and McKellen share credit for devising a production
- full of startling visual imagery. McKellen casually snuffs out
- clumps of candles as he enumerates, deadpan, the friends and
- relatives he means to kill. Richard's brother, the Duke of
- Clarence, hunches in custody under a single, searing overhead
- lamp in a scene eerily suggestive of all interrogations that
- turn to torture. Most striking, the King's counselors sit at a
- long table and talk in bureaucratic euphemisms about bloody
- murders to be done someplace out of sight, while simultaneously
- the crimes are being enacted in full view of the audience.
- </p>
- <p> Unfortunately, all these shrewd insights were muffled in
- the American debut performance by the acoustic shortcomings of
- the opera house at the Brooklyn Academy of Music. Long sections
- of dialogue were indecipherable even to those seated far
- forward. Worse, the production -- which will tour to Wash
- ington, St. Paul, Denver, San Francisco and Los Angeles this
- summer -- is encumbered by a generally second-rate supporting
- cast. Part of the problem may be in attracting top-quality
- actors to so long a tour, for the standard is well below what
- is customary on the National's stages in London.
- </p>
- <p> Eyre sought the tour in order to heighten his theater's
- profile, not least in the U.S., where its lesser rival, the
- Royal Shakespeare Company, is much better known. McKellen has
- made it clear that he savors the family feeling of a tour and
- welcomes the chance to proselytize widely for gay rights.
- Fortunately for audiences, whatever their other agendas, the two
- creators still see to it that the play's the thing.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-