home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
072390
/
0723206.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
74 lines
<text id=90TT1930>
<title>
July 23, 1990: "An Easy Grab"
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
July 23, 1990 The Palestinians
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
BUSINESS, Page 60
"An Easy Grab"
</hdr>
<body>
<p>A proposal for a higher tax on securities trading
</p>
<p> Ever since George Bush quietly acknowledged last month that
"increased tax revenues" would be necessary to reduce the
budget deficit, everyone in Washington has been running for
cover. No wonder. Louisiana's legendary Russell Long once
described raising taxes as a game of "don't tax me, don't tax
thee, tax that fellow behind the tree."
</p>
<p> Last week Wall Street was wondering whether it was the
fellow behind the tree. Bush Administration officials floated
the idea that they might consider raising the tiny tax on stock
and bond transactions--one-third of 1%--to help erase the
deficit. The leak looked serious because security-transfer
taxes are easy to collect, politically painless and potentially
lucrative.
</p>
<p> The idea appears to have the support of both Budget Director
Richard Darman and Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady. Darman
is intrigued with the idea because he knows he must raise taxes
on wealthier Americans if he is to win Democratic support for
Bush's cherished reduction in the capital-gains tax; he also
knows that Bush is loath to raise income taxes to achieve this.
Brady, on the other hand, has long objected to the quick
turnover of securities by stock- and bondholders. Ever since
he headed a blue-ribbon panel that investigated the 1987 Wall
Street crash, Brady has waged a personal campaign to get people
to make long-term investments rather than take short-term
profits. A tax on security transactions, Brady feels, would
encourage investors to take the longer view.
</p>
<p> One plan is to boost the current tax from one-third of 1%
of the value of each stock trade to 5% of a transaction's
value, which would raise an estimated $60 billion over five
years. "It's an easy grab," admitted a securities lobbyist
fighting the plan. "It raises billions from people who don't
scream and may not even feel it."
</p>
<p> Securities lobbyists, in a desperate attempt to marshal
opponents on Capitol Hill, immediately labeled the transfer
levy a "tax on savings." Other critics note that Brady's own
commission pointed out that a similar plan proposed by
lawmakers in October 1987 helped trigger the crash.
</p>
<p> Bush officials dismiss such fearmongering, saying the market
is protected from the sort of dive it took in 1987. And despite
the cries of pain, several generals in Wall Street's jihad
against Darman and Brady acknowledged that they could live with
a smaller increase, perhaps two-thirds of 1% of a transaction's
value, which would raise $2 billion to $3 billion a year. Wall
Street knows that the only thing worse than a tax on trading
is a sick economy.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>