home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
072693
/
0726301.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
7KB
|
135 lines
<text id=93TT0245>
<title>
July 26, 1993: A Playwright's Insight--and Warning
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
July 26, 1993 The Flood Of '93
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
SCIENCE, Page 38
A Playwright's Insight--And Warning
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By JONATHAN TOLINSTolins' play, The Twilight of the Golds, is
running at Washington's Kennedy Center and headed for Broadway.
</p>
<p> In the hours after the new study linking homosexuality with
heredity was released, I was asked several times if I possessed
psychic powers. The play I wrote, The Twilight of the Golds,
is the story of a family thrown into turmoil when a pregnant
woman is told through genetic testing that her fetus will most
likely be homosexual. "It's like The China Syndrome and Three
Mile Island," people said. "How did you know to write about
this a year and a half ago?"
</p>
<p> At first I replied, a bit smugly, "Well, if you followed the
recent developments in this kind of research, the Simon LeVay
hypothalamus study and all that, it was obvious that this was
the direction in which we were headed. Blah, blah, blah."
</p>
<p> But that's not the real answer. The truth is, I knew, as just
about any gay person did, that it was only a matter of time.
I knew in my bones that my own sexuality was not a decision
but a natural part of who I am. I was confident that it wasn't
a sign of psychiatric illness or of a dysfunctional upbringing--my father was just as smothering as my mother, thank you,
and in the best way possible. The coming-out process is not
one of choice but of self-discovery and acceptance. To find
a biological or genetic basis for this variation of human nature
made perfect sense.
</p>
<p> So my first reaction to the news (after "I hope this sells some
tickets") was one of excitement and relief. So much of the anti-gay
legal and social argument is based on the premise that it is
a learned behavior and an immoral choice. This would prove them
wrong! That feeling lasted about a minute and a half. The notion
that Pat Robertson might look at a chart of DNA and say, "Well,
I'll be; I've been wrong all this time. I'd better send an apology,
maybe a small gift to Larry Kramer..." is absurd. Indeed,
conservatives have already come forward with their own interpretations
of the new findings; a representative of the Family Research
Council compared homosexuality with illnesses like alcoholism.
It seems that those who have a fundamental hatred of homosexuals
will not be swayed.
</p>
<p> And without the potential good this new information can do in
changing people's minds, the potential dangers are terrifying.
Some may search for a "cure" or, in the more immediate future,
consider aborting a fetus that is predicted to be gay. This
is the scenario in The Twilight of the Golds, which I expected
to remain in the realm of science fiction for much longer than
it apparently will.
</p>
<p> The title of the play is a pun on The Twilight of the Gods,
the final opera in Richard Wagner's Ring cycle. The Ring is
a sprawling work about gods and mortals deciding the fate of
the world. The information the Gold family receives in the play
puts them in the same godlike position, just where the current
crop of genetic discoveries puts all of us. It is impossible
to overstate the significance of these questions, What kind
of world do we want? How will we make these decisions? Whom
do we let in?
</p>
<p> Homosexuals are particularly vulnerable in this situation because,
distinct from most other minorities, they are born into a family
of people unlike themselves. Even the most liberal-minded heterosexual
may stop for a moment and think, "Well, do I want my child to
be gay?" In that moment of reflection lies the danger of genocide.
No, it wouldn't have the calculated and theatrical horror of
the concentration camps, but a minority population would be
destroyed.
</p>
<p> Well, so what? If people have such a distaste for homosexuals
and subject them to discrimination and violence, why not remove
this gene that brings with it so much controversy and suffering?
The answer to this chilling question is simple. Because we'll
lose too much. Being gay is not just a question of sexuality.
When you are gay, you are part of a community, and it's not
just the one shown in that cheesy footage of bare-chested guys
slamdancing on the evening news. (When they need "heterosexual"
footage, do the cameramen run to the local Chippendale's?)
</p>
<p> Gay people are exactly that, "a people." When you come out,
you discover a mysterious, close bond with others like you that
is based on something much deeper than sex. What we share is
unrelated to geography, religion or ethnicity. What links us
is our feelings. This may be why there is such a thriving gay
culture, filled with wit and celebration. Even the ravages of
the AIDS epidemic haven't destroyed the gay spirit. Can you
remove what makes a person gay and maintain that unique sensibility
that has played a disproportionate role in the world's art and
history? I don't think so. As the character of David Gold points
out, "Every human being is a tapestry. You pull one thread,
one undesirable color, and the art unravels. You end up staring
at the walls."
</p>
<p> The way to prevent this nightmare is not to put limits on scientific
research or on a woman's right to have an abortion. Those are
Band-Aid solutions that attack the wrong problem. The only solution
is a frank discussion through which people understand the richness
of the gay community and that to attack one unpopular group
is to attack us all, no matter how skilled the rhetoric used
in the cause of bigotry. The sooner such discussions take place,
the better, for science will not wait.
</p>
<p> When Twilight opened recently in Washington, I was fortunate
enough to spend a day at the brand-new and heartbreaking Holocaust
Museum. Yet again, I was stunned by the Nazis' painstaking "scientific"
attempts to rid the gene pool of unwanted traits. Now, barely
50 years later, science is giving us the knowledge and tools
that Hitler's medical staff only dreamed of. Our society will
be forced, whether it wants to or not, to answer this question
and others like it: Was Hitler wrong about the Jews but right
about the homosexuals?
</p>
<p> For those of us who think he wasn't right at all, it's time,
once again, to get to work.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>