home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT1908>
- <title>
- Aug. 26, 1991: When Harry Met Clare . . .
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Aug. 26, 1991 Science Under Siege
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BOOKS, Page 61
- When Harry Met Clare...
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By John Elson
- </p>
- <qt>
- <l>HENRY & CLARE: AN INTIMATE PORTRAIT OF THE LUCES</l>
- <l>By Ralph G. Martin</l>
- <l>Putnam; 463 pages; $24.95</l>
- </qt>
- <p> The first serious encounter between the co-founder of this
- magazine and the woman who became his second wife took place at
- a 1934 dinner given by mutual friends. Clare Boothe Brokaw sat
- at Henry R. Luce's right, but they scarcely talked, and he left
- early; she thought him fascinating but incredibly rude. Two
- months later, at a Waldorf-Astoria party honoring Cole Porter,
- it was a different story. Oblivious to other guests, including
- his then spouse Lila, Luce sat with Brokaw at a corner table
- and conversed intently until 4 a.m. In the hotel lobby, he
- blurted out, "How does it feel to be told that you are the one
- woman, the only woman, in a man's life?" "Whose life?" she
- asked. "Mine," he answered.
- </p>
- <p> Thus, according to this slovenly written tattletale, began
- one of the most famous of America's celebrity unions. With
- 11-year-old TIME both popular and profitable and newly born
- FORTUNE a critical success, Harry Luce, then 36, was on the
- verge of becoming the nation's most powerful magazine publisher.
- Clare Brokaw--journalist and playwright, future Congresswoman
- and ambassador--at 31 was Manhattan's paradigmatic gay
- divorcee, renowned as much for her merciless wit as for her
- delicate porcelain beauty.
- </p>
- <p> The pair married in 1935, but the union was not perfect.
- Harry, Martin writes, had extended relationships with Jean
- Dalrymple, a Broadway producer and theatrical agent and
- (platonically, it seems) with Mary Bancroft, who, among other
- accomplishments, had been a wartime spy master for the OSS.
- Clare's lovers, according to the author, included financier
- Bernard Baruch, Sir Winston Churchill's son Randolph and others
- (as the saying goes) too numerous to mention. Martin portrays
- Harry as a reluctant adulterer, consumed with Presbyterian
- guilt, who sought from other women the kind of feminine solace
- Clare could not or would not give. Clare, by contrast, is limned
- as a dazzling but neurotic conniver for whom sex was primarily
- a way to keep men at her feet.
- </p>
- <p> The liaison that most seriously threatened the marriage,
- which endured until Luce's death in 1967, involved Lady Jeanne
- Campbell, granddaughter of the British press tycoon Lord
- Beaverbrook. As a favor to the Beaver, TIME in 1956 found a
- minor job in its picture department for Lady Jeanne. Luce became
- so openly smitten with this cheerful redhead, 31 years his
- junior, that rumors of the affair appeared in gossip columns.
- He discussed a divorce with Clare but backed away, Martin
- alleges, when she attempted suicide and demanded editorial
- control of Time Inc. as the price of freedom. On the rebound,
- Lady Jeanne briefly and tempestuously married novelist Norman
- Mailer.
- </p>
- <p> All this is quite titillating--and some of it has been
- recorded before--but there are grounds for wondering how
- accurate Martin's amatory scorekeeping really is. In his
- acknowledgments and chapter notes, the author cites the
- "invaluable" assistance of interviews with Richard M. Clurman,
- for many years Time Inc.'s chief of correspondents, and his wife
- Shirley, a close friend of Clare's and a former TIME publicist.
- But Dick Clurman states categorically that he merely gave Martin
- a list of potential sources and was too busy to submit to an
- interview. Shirley Clurman says she spoke with Martin "for 20
- minutes, maximum." Asked about the author's assertion that Clare
- and Randolph Churchill were lovers, Mrs. Clurman has a succinct
- retort: "Garbage!"
- </p>
- <p> These are not the only credibility gaps. Henry & Clare is
- rife with errors, undocumented innuendo, non sequiturs and
- contradictions. Martin shows little understanding of how the
- Luce organization worked; the portraits of his principals are
- caricature-crude, especially in the case of Clare. In biography
- even more than architecture, God is in the details. By that
- standard, Henry & Clare deserves the scathing verdict that Luce
- often penciled on drafts of unsatisfactory stories: "Needs
- work."
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-