home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
091790
/
0917421.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-15
|
3KB
|
81 lines
<text id=90TT2466>
<link 90TT2272>
<title>
Sep. 17, 1990: It's Great! Don't Show It!
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Sep. 17, 1990 The Rotting Of The Big Apple
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
CINEMA, Page 70
It's Great! Don't Show It!
</hdr>
<body>
<p>A misguided rating system slaps an X on a discreetly erotic film
</p>
<p>By Richard Corliss
</p>
<p> Henry Miller, an expatriate Brooklynite in '30s Paris, wrote
rambunctious novels about sex and saw Tropic of Cancer banned
in his homeland for 30 years. Anais Nin, a Frenchwoman who
befriended Miller, wrote intimate journals that remained
expurgated long after their publication. Now American director
Philip Kaufman (The Right Stuff) has made a biography of the
two writers and Miller's wife June. Surprise! Henry & June has
been rated X by the industry's classification board.
</p>
<p> If the rating sticks, Kaufman could become the most notable
victim of an increasingly misguided system of self-censorship.
Even in a year when the rating board has slapped Xs on a dozen
films, the Henry & June rating sent new shudders through
Hollywood's creative community. "Phil Kaufman does not make
X-rated movies," says filmmaker James Brooks (Terms of
Endearment). "So if Kaufman makes a movie that is rated X, then
there's something wrong with the system."
</p>
<p> There is indeed. It is a system that punishes eroticism with
an X rating, yet rewards violence--from rape to dismemberment--with an R. Each new violent movie, like this summer's Total
Recall, wants to astonish jaded audiences with its
special-effects audacity. But adult sexuality, even when
investigated as discreetly as it is in Henry & June, is deemed
objectionable. "You can cut off a breast," says Kaufman, "but
you can't caress it. The violent majority is dictating to a
tender minority."
</p>
<p> So what happens in Henry & June? The main characters make
urgent love, man to woman, woman to woman. They visit a
whorehouse and watch prostitutes mime sex. They attend a dada
Mardi Gras where nude women wear blue paint. But Henry & June
is not a blue movie. Kaufman is a fastidious director; he
bathes every love bout in soft focus, or covers it in lace, or
reflects it in a goldfish bowl. It's not just that his intent
is artistic, it's that his content is mild. Lesbian love, for
example, was shown more graphically in Personal Best, Desert
Hearts or Kaufman's The Unbearable Lightness of Being, all rated
R. "I played by the rules," he says, "and they changed them."
</p>
<p> Some rules never change. Even a studio as sympathetic to
maverick talent as Universal Pictures will not release an
X-rated film. "We want to support Phil's vision," says
Universal president Tom Pollack, "as we did with Spike Lee on
Do the Right Thing and Martin Scorsese on The Last Temptation
of Christ." But if Henry & June loses its Oct. 3 appeal to the
rating board, Kaufman has only two options: cut the film to the
censors' pattern or take his movie to an independent
distributor.
</p>
<p> If reason prevails and Henry & June is released as is, its
ads can run a money quote: "A masterpiece! Don't cut a frame
of it!" What movie critic proffered that rave? Richard Heffner,
head of the rating board, who made those comments to Kaufman
as he awarded the film its toxic X.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>