home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT0938>
- <title>
- Apr. 27, 1992: Reviews:Theater
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Apr. 27, 1992 The Untold Story of Pan Am 103
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEWS, Page 65
- THEATER
- Broadway's Bell Goes Ding! Dong!
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By William A. Henry III
- </p>
- <qt>
- <l>TITLE: Guys and Dolls</l>
- <l>AUTHOR: Music and Lyrics by Frank Loesser;</l>
- <l>Book by Jo Swerling and Abe Burrows</l>
- <l>WHERE: Broadway</l>
- </qt>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: The greatest of all American musicals
- gets the rousing revival it deserves.
- </p>
- <p> One might imagine that Laurence Olivier could have
- commanded any role he chose, and conjured up virtually any
- showcase production to feature it. But the actor of the century
- died thwarted because he was unable, while running Britain's
- Royal National Theater, to finance a production of Guys and
- Dolls starring himself as the lowlife gambler Nathan Detroit.
- It's unclear whether Olivier could have brought off this plum
- musical role--the legendary Shakespearean's song-and-dance
- talents went largely untested during his career, and his
- American accents tended to be unplaceably wayward--but his
- taste was impeccable. As the Broadway revival that opened last
- week demonstrates anew, Guys and Dolls is the finest blend of
- memorable tunes, witty yet in-character lyrics, robust humor,
- tender romance, streetwise sass and overall style that the
- American musical theater has ever produced.
- </p>
- <p> Like the Damon Runyon stories from which it grew, this
- outwardly hard, cynical piece is in truth a moralizing fable
- about honor among thieves, the rehabilitation potential of
- practically anyone, and the redemptive power of love. As
- envisioned by director Jerry Zaks and set designer Tony Walton,
- it is also a paean to an urban zest, vitality and security that
- no longer exist and probably never did. The show's look is
- deliberately old fashioned, a combination pastiche and homage
- to the days when scenery was painted backdrops and choruses
- always ended up at some point as lines at the front of the
- stage. The flavor of this rendition is deliberately jokey, an
- acknowledgment that the gangsters who so heavily populate its
- story are sentimentalizations; they may dress worse than John
- Gotti, but they behave infinitely better.
- </p>
- <p> The period-piece treatment may seem unnecessary and
- distancing. But this is a cavil compared with the production's
- many virtues, from its costumes, a literal laff riot of
- cacophonous color, to its performances. Faith Prince's
- over-the-top yet completely convincing medof mannerisms as
- Nathan's loved one, Miss Adelaide, is the central delight of the
- evening. But the fulcrum of the story is Peter Gallagher's blend
- of immense charm with an appropriately edgy and dangerous aura
- as the big-time gambler Sky Masterson. Vocally, the whole show
- is strong. Prince and Nathan Lane, as Detroit, are supremely
- articulate in the comic songs, Gallagher and the bell-voiced
- Josie de Guzman, as the missionary Sarah Brown, rich and
- exuberant in the ballads. The smaller characters are played
- appropriately broadly yet with real zing.
- </p>
- <p> The greatest asset, however, is neither the show's nonstop
- movement nor its unselfconscious ribaldry, but the fact that it
- is back where it belongs: out of the cast-album bin at record
- stores and igniting Broadway again.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-