home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Posted April 11, 1994
-
- This file contains the Final Report of the ARRL Ad-Hoc Committee
- on Preferred Callsigns
-
- Committee Members:
- Mr. Steve Mendelsohn, WA2DHF, Chairman
- Mr. Frank Butler, W4RH
- Mr. Tom Comstock, N5TC
- Mr. John Kanode, N4MM
- Mr. Brad Wyatt, K6WR
-
- Executive Summary
-
- The Committee was created by President Wilson to recommend a
- response to the Board in P.R. Docket 93-305, the Vanity Callsign
- proposal. The charter from President Wilson included a request
- that member input be sought in the limited time before the March
- 7, 1994, filing deadline.
-
- To accommodate this request Vice Director Rothberg and the
- chairman conducted a survey of our respective divisions using
- packet radio, mail and a request to newsletter editors to
- reproduce the survey form for club input. Over 730 responses
- have been received and tallied. Numeric results track with
- anecdotal results seen in member letters to Headquarters.
-
- The Board family has been especially helpful in forwarding and
- recounting comments from the field. Directors Burden, Comstock,
- Gordon, Heyn, Kanode, Lewis, Olson, Wyatt, Vice Directors
- Brackob, (monitoring the discussion on CompuServe) Brown, Frahm
- and Rothberg have forwarded member response by mail, through
- Headquarters and electronically to the Committee.
-
- Executive Vice President Sumner made members aware of the
- Committee's work through an editorial and article in February,
- 1994, QST. EVP Sumner and VEC Manager Jahnke provided the
- Committee with an excellent option paper on electronic submission
- of license requests by various means.
-
- Recommendations
-
- 1. Who Should Participate
-
- The Committee recommends that the Board adopt the position that
- all amateurs be eligible for participation in the program after
- an initial phase in period.
-
- While 7% of the respondents to the survey were against the
- program entirely and another 3.5% wanted to limit the program to
- General class and above, the majority of comments received
- welcome the creation of the program while recognizing that some
- method of initial filtering must be used to keep the FCC from
- being inundated with applications in the beginning.
-
- 2. The issue of Fees
-
- The fee quoted in the Docket, $7.00 per year collected for the
- length of grant of license (10 years), was set by Congress in the
- Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. To change the amount or type
- of fee would require the League to commit its efforts in the
- Congress toward changing the fee.
-
- The Committee recommends that the League seek such relief in
- favor of a one time administrative processing fee with the
- understanding that no amateur licensee should incur a user fee.
-
- There is no periodic processing expense related to this program
- after the initial look-up work has occurred. Labor involved with
- renewal of a Preferred Callsign will not differ in any way from
- the renewal of a non-preferred callsign, therefor the Committee
- believes no additional labor charge should be incurred by the
- licensee.
-
- During the course of this proceeding people filed comments with
- the Commission asking why those with Preferred Callsigns have to
- pay recurring, yearly fees. The Commission's response may well
- be to ask that ALL amateurs pay such user fees. Without
- question, this would be viewed as an undesirable outcome to such
- a question.
-
- Additional factors supporting the one-time administrative fee
- position include the time value of money and reduction in
- administrative workload.
-
- The Government benefits by collecting the entire fee at the
- beginning of the process rather than on a yearly basis or at the
- end of the license term. The one-time fee concept would also
- greatly reduce the Commission's fee collection workload by not
- having to administrate an ongoing fee collection process at
- license renewal time.
-
- 3. Holders of previous Preferred Callsigns
-
- The Committee recommends a statement that any callsign held prior
- to the start of this program shall be considered a sequential
- callsign and exempt from any administrative fee associated with
- this program.
-
- 4. Phase-in Periods and Priorities
-
- The Committee recommends a phase-in period to allow the
- Commission a reasonable chance to process the expected heavy
- initial submission of applications.
-
- Conversations with Commission Information Services staff in
- Gettysburg indicate that no additional application processing
- manpower will be used to work on Preferred Callsign applications.
- The same four people who process all new and renewal form 610s
- will be processing the new form 610-V as well. Therefore, a
- phase in period would be wise to prevent severe overload at
- Gettysburg.
-
- Phase-in periods may be perceived as "gates". As each succeeding
- gate opens it will admit applications from a new group as well as
- any group allowed by a previous gate.
-
- Gate one would allow applications from holders of previous
- callsigns who have lost their original call through failure to
- renew at the proper time or having moved from one location to
- another mandating a change of callsign. A callsign could be
- recovered even if it did not match the applicants current
- permanent address.
-
- Included in this group would be those who wish to obtain the
- callsign of a direct family member. The term direct, as used
- here, would only include a brother, sister, spouse, son or
- daughter of the original licensee.
-
- The Committee recommends that clubs with lapsed club licenses
- also be allowed to recoup those callsigns in the first group.
-
- The second gate would include all Extra Class licensees and those
- enfranchised by gate one.
-
- The third gate would include all Advanced Class licensees and
- those enfranchised in gates one and two.
-
- At this point the system would be thrown open to anyone else
- desiring a Preferred Callsign.
-
- 5. Club Applications
-
- Clubs wishing to obtain the callsign of a silent key member could
- do so in the second gate period if the trustee of the club were
- an extra class licensee. This should present no problem for most
- legitimate clubs. Similar logic would apply to trustees with
- other classes of license.
-
- The Committee believes family members should have first choice of
- a silent key's call. Should no family member desire the call,
- the club should have next choice.
-
- It is been the League position that the number of members of a
- club be raised to at least 4 for a group to be considered a
- "radio club". This proceeding again emphasizes the need for the
- Commission to raise the number of members needed to ensure
- legitimacy and prevent fraud.
-
- The League's Part 97 Rewrite Committee suggested raising the
- number of members required in Part 97.5(d)(2) from two to four.
- The Committee recommends this proceeding be used as an
- opportunity to restate that position.
-
- The Committee recommends that, for purposes of defining a
- legitimate club in Part 97.5(d)(2), the number of members be
- raised from the current 2 to at least 4.
-
- 6. Vacated Callsigns
-
- As proposed in the NPRM, a call is considered "vacated" when its
- previous owner has been assigned a Preferred Callsign. The
- Commission would put the vacated call into the available pool
- immediately. The Committee believes this could lead to many
- problems. As an alternative...
-
- The Committee recommends that the vacated callsign not be
- reassigned for a two year period.
-
- Incoming QSL bureaus, especially, have noted that many services
- count on the user callsign being correct. An instant
- reassignment of a prior held call to a new licensee could cause
- multiple problems for volunteer service groups, such as the
- bureaus.
-
- Another consideration is "trafficking in callsigns" The
- Committee believes that a two year hold on a vacated callsign
- would preclude questionable practices arising in which one
- amateur would persuade another to change their call so the first
- amateur could acquire the desired call. This practice could open
- up a new area of fraud allowing people to submit questionable
- documents showing that amateur B wanted to give up a call so
- amateur A could acquire it.
-
- 7. Number of Choices on Form 610-V
-
- The Committee recommends that the number of choices be increased
- to 25.
-
- This should reduce processing and correspondence time if the 10
- requested callsigns are all unavailable. The applicant need not
- fill in all 25 callsigns, but it would increase the chance of a
- positive match if the applicant had 25 choices.
-
- 8. Retirement of Callsigns
-
- A small number of commenters stated the belief that re-issuance
- of callsigns of silent keys would be somehow disrespectful. The
- Committee does not share this viewpoint.
-
- While the Committee was sensitive to the fond memory the silent
- key's friends might have, the callsign is really the "property"
- of the Commission and is part of the condition of grant to the
- licensee. In essence it is "loaned" to the licensee for the term
- of the license. It would, therefore, become eligible for re-
- issuance once the renewal grace period had expired.
-
- If an individual passed away just before license renewal time it
- would be at least two years before the callsign became available
- for re-issue at the end of the renewal grace period. A more
- probable condition would be that the licensee would pass on in
- the middle of the license term. Then the callsign would not
- become available for between four and seven years after the
- amateur passed on.
-
- Should an individual, club or group think highly of the deceased,
- nothing precludes finding an inactive ham and asking the
- individual to change callsigns by requesting the silent key's old
- callsign through this program.
-
- 9. Out of Area Callsign Issuance
-
- The Committee recommends that within the lower 48 states the
- Commission continue issuing callsigns with the number within the
- callsign relative to the applicants current permanent address.
- This recommendation would be for Preferred Callsigns as well as
- sequentially generated callsigns.
-
- A quick historical retrospective is in order at this point. One
- of the original reasons for breaking the continental United
- States into ten callsign districts was to help the FCC's Field
- Operations Bureau begin to locate an emitter for enforcement
- purposes.
-
- Today's state-of-the-art direction finding does not need to know
- which callsign district the emitter is located in. This fact was
- part of the rationale the Commission used in eliminating the
- requirement for a licensee to sign "portable" when away from the
- licensed station location. Therefore, the Commission doesn't
- appear to care whether the a licensee has a district indicator
- consonant with the operators station location.
-
- However, anecdotal evidence in letters and on survey forms
- indicates that, contrary to the Commission's technological needs,
- most amateurs have grown accustomed to the practice of callsign
- numbers indicating which area of the country the licensee is in
- and would like the tradition continued. The callsign number
- gives the operators on each end of the circuit an immediate
- indication of where the other is and "in which direction to turn
- the beam."
-
- Therefore, the Committee recommends this tradition of issuing
- callsigns with the number within the callsign consonant with the
- applicants current permanent address be continued.
-
- 10. Outside of the Continental United States
-
- Amateurs in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the American Virgin
- Islands and in the Pacific have shared their concern with
- Directors Wyatt and Butler about amateurs being able to acquire
- callsigns from their area without being a current permanent
- resident. This is a valid concern because in some areas, notably
- Hawaii, the KH6 callsign block is nearly gone. Most of it has
- been assigned to visitors and those who are now deceased.
-
- While the re-issuance of callsigns of deceased amateurs will ease
- the problem, the Committee recommends that outside the
- continental 48 states applicants be required to furnish the
- Commission with some form of documentation indicating permanent
- residency. Visitors would continue to use the portable
- designator, thereby not depleting a callsign pool available only
- to permanent residents.
-
- 11. Specific Comments on the NPRM
-
- New 97.19 (c) Substitute the following:
-
- Each request for a renewal of a operator/primary or club station
- license retaining a call sign assigned under the vanity call sign
- system shall be made on FCC form 610-V. The form must be
- submitted [eliminate "with the proper fee"] to the address
- specified in the Private Radio Services Fee Filing Guide. To
- renew the license without retaining a vanity call sign, the
- applicant must use FCC form 610 as specified in Section 97.21.
-
- New 97.19(f)(3)
-
- A call sign that is vacated by the licensee is [add "not"]
- available to the vanity call sign system [add "for 2 years
- following the expiration of the license"].
-
- Sentence Added to the end of 97.19(g)
-
- A callsign previously held by the applicant, available to the
- vanity callsign system but expired, may be requested without
- regard to license class group or current permanent residence.
-
- New 97.19(g)(1)
-
- The applicant must request that the call sign held be canceled
- and provide a list of up to [change 10 to 25] call signs in order
- of preference. The list will automatically end with the call
- sign vacated as the [change "tenth" to "twenty sixth"] choice.
-
- New 97.19(g)(2)
-
- The first available call sign from the applicant's list will be
- assigned. When none of those call signs are available, the call
- sign vacated by the applicant will be reassigned [add "and the
- administrative fee returned".]
-
- New 97.5(d)(2)
-
- A club station license (FCC Form 660) issued to the person by the
- FCC. A club station license is issued only to the person who is
- the license trustee designated by an officer of the club. The
- trustee must hold an FCC-issued Amateur Extra, Advanced, General
- or Technician operator license. The club must be composed of at
- least [change "two" to "four"] persons and must have a name, a
- document of organization, management and a primary purpose
- devoted to amateur service activities consistent with this Part.
-
- 12. Questions Posed in the Discussion Section
-
- In paragraph 5 the Commission asks about alternative ways to file
- form 610-V.
-
- The Committee recommends that the same, simple, ASCII format used
- in League contest filings be recommended to the Commission IS
- group as a starting point for electronic filing
-
- In Paragraph 6 the NPRM requests comments on distribution of
- available callsign information.
-
- The Committee recommends that a League computer and modem, or
- HIRAM be made available, in the short term, as a distribution
- method with the Commission filing at least weekly updates or
- sending a disk or disks detailing callsign availability.
-
- Alternately, for-profit data services, such as Compuserve's
- Hamnet forum, could be used by the Commission to make current
- callsign information available.
-
- 13. Special Event Callsigns
-
- The Committee recommends that 1 X 1 callsigns, such as K2A, be
- made available for limited duration special events of national
- significance.
-
- There are likely to be few special event stations of national
- significance operating at any one time within a single call
- district. Therefore, the issuance of a 1 X 1 callsign should be
- possible without measurably adding to the Commission's workload.
-
- 14. Final Comments
-
- The Chairman would like to thank the Directors Butler, Comstock,
- Kanode and Wyatt, EVP Sumner and VEC Department Manager Jahnke
- for the hard work they did in such a compressed time period.
-
- A statistical treatment of the data used to derive the
- Committee's position will be sent as an enclosure to this report.
-
- Respectfully Submitted,
-
- Stephen Mendelsohn, WA2DHF, Chairman
-