home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Fresh Fish 9
/
FreshFishVol9-CD2.bin
/
bbs
/
reviews
/
text.lha
/
text
/
FinalWriter2
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-06-09
|
20KB
Path: news.uh.edu!barrett
From: per-espen.hagen@ffi.no (Per Espen Hagen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.reviews
Subject: REVIEW: Final Writer, Release 2
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.applications
Date: 9 Jun 1994 19:38:53 GMT
Organization: The Amiga Online Review Column - ed. Daniel Barrett
Lines: 420
Sender: amiga-reviews@math.uh.edu (comp.sys.amiga.reviews moderator)
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2t7r4d$kmp@masala.cc.uh.edu>
Reply-To: per-espen.hagen@ffi.no (Per Espen Hagen)
NNTP-Posting-Host: karazm.math.uh.edu
Keywords: word processor, graphics, Postscript, commercial
Originator: barrett@karazm.math.uh.edu
PRODUCT NAME
Final Writer, Release 2 (UK version)
[MODERATOR'S NOTE: This review is accompanied by two pictures in
GIF format. They will be uuencoded and posted in c.s.a.reviews
immediately after this review. They may also be found on the
c.s.a.reviews ftp site, math.uh.edu, in the directory
/pub/Amiga/comp.sys.amiga.reviews/software/text/hagen
The filenames are FWFonts.gif and FWScreen.gif. Since these are GIF
format graphics files, and you will need a program such as PPShow,
FastGif, ViewTek, or a GIF Datatype in order to view it on an
Amiga. X window users can view it with "xv". - Dan]
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
WYSIWYG ("What You See Is What You Get") word processor with good
graphics, Postscript, and ARexx support.
AUTHOR/COMPANY INFORMATION
Name: SoftWood, Inc.
Address: PO Box 50178
Phoenix, Arizona 85076
USA
Telephone: (602) 431-9151
LIST PRICE
I paid NOK 1500 (approximately GBP 140) for Release 1 six months
ago, and GBP 7.95 for the upgrade to Release 2.
SPECIAL HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
HARDWARE
2 MB RAM required. More is needed for some operations; 4-6
MB should be sufficient for most users.
Hard drive required. A full installation requires about 10
MB of hard disk space, and a minimal installation 3 MB.
68020 CPU or better recommended.
SOFTWARE
AmigaOS 2.0 or higher required.
COPY PROTECTION
None. Hard drive installable (obviously).
MACHINE USED FOR TESTING
Amiga 1200 with Blizzard 1230-II, 40 MHz 68030/68882.
12 MB Fast RAM, 2 MB Chip RAM.
Toshiba 250 MB 2.5" IDE hard drive.
Commodore 1940 and IDEK MF-5017 multisync monitors.
AmigaOS 3.0 (Kickstart 39.106, Workbench 39.29, SetPatch 40.14).
MultiUserFileSystem 1.7 on all partitions.
Running commodities: Exchange, ToolManager 2.1, MagicMenu 1.29,
CycleToMenu 2.0, The Promotor 1.14, SwazInfo 1.4.55,
TitleClock 3, Yak 1.58.
AIBB performance rating vs Amiga 4000-040: 1.05 (integer), 0.67
(graphics), 0.47 (floating point).
INSTALLATION
Final Writer comes on seven floppies filled with compressed archives.
The upgrade to Release 2 comes on one disk: a replacement for the original
Disk 1. Installation is performed very comfortably with the standard
Commodore Installer program. When upgrading from Release 1, only the
updated files are installed.
The upgrade installation did not work for me -- none of the files
were copied! This might be due to my using MultiUserFileSystem, but I can't
see why. I tried it twice, with the same result both times. Instead of
fiddling more with Installer, I performed the upgrade manually (unarchiving
the new files from the Release 2 upgrade disk).
INTRODUCTION
Until about a year ago, I had not done any real word processing on
the Amiga, and I didn't want to either. I was spoiled from using high-end
DTP on Unix boxes at work: Interleaf, a publishing system which makes
FrameMaker look like a toy, requires a HP 9000/735 to run reasonably
smoothly, and costs thousands of dollars per license. Every word processor
I had seen on the Amiga was so primitive it seemed next to useless. The
best-looking one was Final Copy II, and the most capable was WordPerfect.
The best was probably Wordworth 2, but it was very slow (I had only a
68020 CPU at 14 MHz then).
Fortunately, this has changed. Final Writer is here, and it's fast,
modern, powerful, and easy to use. It's not in any way The Ultimate Word
Processor, but it's definitely a good product. There. Now I'm done with the
conclusion, so let's get on with the review. :-)
USER INTERFACE
SoftWood have understood one of the most fundamental rules in user
interface design: different people want to do things in different ways. As
a result, almost every function in FW can be performed in at least two ways,
and often three or four. In addition, the user interface is very
configurable. You can set up custom button palettes, add menu items and
function key bindings, and specify defaults for almost all aspects of the
program.
Final Writer can open screens in just about any mode and depth in the
Amiga Screen Mode database, including those of some 3rd-party, RTG graphics
boards. It can also run on the Workbench screen. Unfortunately, you cannot
change the screen mode once the program is running. Because the mode (or
rather, the depth) that I want to use varies, I have configured Final Writer
so that it asks me at startup. Final Writer will work on a normal PAL screen
(640x256), but it won't look too good that way. Some form of
high-resolution display is almost a necessity for this type of program.
640x480 resolution is OK; I use 800x600.
The user interface is not totally Amiga User Interface Style Guide
(AUISG) compliant. SoftWood use their own gadgets and requesters, instead of
the standard GadTools and ASL/Intuition ones. SoftWood's are similar but a
little more "flashy" -- actually, they look a lot like those of Magic User
Interface (MUI) with XEN presets. I would have preferred the standard ones,
but it's no big deal really. They also use an irritating, AvantGarde-type
font in requesters and menus. This problem can be remedied by copying the
font of your liking to "FWFonts/SWScrFont/13". The replacement font doesn't
even have to be size 13! (This fix is just a kludge and not documented in
the manual.)
I have included a screen shot of Final Writer in 64-colour mode, with
my replacement font (XHelvetica/11), showing some of the windows, palettes
etc of Final Writer. (Actually, the picture doesn't do FW full justice,
because the colourmap is grabbed only in 12-bit color).
[MODERATOR'S NOTE: See the picture "FWScreen.gif", as described at
the top of the review. - Dan]
You can have many documents open at the same time. Many of the
special windows, like the Speller and Thesaurus windows, are "non-modal";
that is, you can leave them open and continue writing/editing the document.
Some other special windows (as well as all requesters) ARE modal, though,
meaning that you can't continue editing until you respond to them.
WORD PROCESSING FEATURES
Before Final Writer, most word processors on the Amiga were OK for
simple tasks like writing letters, but they lacked a lot of the features
needed for large projects. In this area, Final Writer is by far the best
word processor for the Amiga. A very important feature is Final Writer's
PARAGRAPH STYLES. You can define styles for headings, sub-headings, normal
text, and so on. A style can contain information about font name,
attributes, and size, plus tabs, alignment, spacing and more. The style to
use in the current paragraph can be selected in one of four ways: menu,
function key, popup-menu gadget, or button. The style of each paragraph is
remembered, so that if you later change the definition of a particular
style, all paragraphs with that style will be automagically updated. This
is a basic and important feature in any good word processor -- but Final
Writer is the ONLY word processor for the Amiga that supports it, as far as
I know. [MODERATOR'S NOTE: Although it is not strictly a word processor,
TeX supports styles through the use of macros. - Dan] Final Writer Release 1
had a bug which made it difficult to use more than seven styles, but this
appears to have been fixed with Release 2. Another problem with styles is
that any attributes used in parts of a paragraph (e.g., italics) will be
removed if the paragraph styles are changed. This has reportedly been fixed
in Release 2.1 (which I haven't received yet).
Final Write