home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME - Man of the Year
/
CompactPublishing-TimeMagazine-TimeManOfTheYear-Win31MSDOS.iso
/
moy
/
113092
/
11309933.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-08
|
3KB
|
60 lines
U.S. MILITARY, Page 42Clinton's First Fire Fight
Bill Clinton never experienced hostile fire in Vietnam or
anywhere else, but last week the future Commander in Chief
learned firsthand what baptism by fire means. His affirmation
of his campaign pledge to lift the Pentagon's ban on homosexuals
serving in the military triggered such anger, especially in the
Pentagon, that he was forced to add that the step would be taken
only after consultation with "a lot of people."
Critics, including all the military-service chiefs,
charged that Clinton's lack of military experience showed that
his insensitivity was surpassed only by his ignorance on the
issue. Republican Senator Bob Dole warned that Clinton would
"get in more trouble than he can add up right now if he starts
with an Executive Order" to change policy. Partisans of change
-- especially among homosexual groups that contributed to
Clinton's campaign -- were determined to take Clinton at his
word. "Mr. Clinton committed himself," said Tanya Domi of the
Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Veterans of America, "and we'll hold
him to his promise."
Lost in the furor was precisely what Clinton is proposing.
Under Department of Defense regulations, which were strongly
criticized in a General Accounting Office report earlier this
year, simply being homosexual is enough to provoke expulsion
without any evidence of misconduct. Since 1982, more than 14,000
people have been kicked out of the military; women were six
times as likely to be expelled as men in what has often amounted
to witch-hunts. Clinton takes great care to emphasize the
difference between sexual orientation and conduct. Simple
homosexual proclivity, he argued, should not be grounds for
expulsion. "Clinton's not advocating a homosexual life-style,"
says Lawrence Korb, a military expert at the Brookings
Institution. "He's just supporting the human rights of those
persons who are."
The nuances in Clinton's plan went widely unrecognized
among military personnel, who barraged the President-elect with
bitter criticism, arguing that homosexuals would undermine good
order and morale. The tight personal living arrangements in the
military, many Pentagon hands contend, are different from the
9-to-5 world of civilians. But for all the uproar, there were
signs that Clinton was winning support. Polls show a majority
of the public favors lifting the ban. In contrast to Senator Sam
Nunn's harsh criticism, House Armed Services Chairman Les Aspin
was quietly supporting the initiative. Even General Colin
Powell, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was having second
thoughts. Although not backing away from his support for the
current policy, Powell announced that the armed forces stand
"ready to do what we're told."