The California Collection/TheCaliforniaCollection.cdr/his095/congress.arj/CONGRESS.TXT

Text File | 1990-03-27 | 4KB | 75 lines

Congress:  Haven for Homos

National Public Radio sports about ten homosexual voices per thirty
minutes daily.  It would seem that the feminine desire to gossip
determines the "life callings" of scores of queers with too many
female genes, and the NEWS MEDIA seems to be their "best bet" for
fulfilling their "lifestyle." All one has to do is go across the FM
radio stations to pick up literally hundreds of fairies who like
"outer space music" from Frisco.  A real male voice on National Public
Radio is a rare thing, and generally it is a foreign correspondent
when it is heard.

Washington, DC, has twenty thousand news media personnel in it whose
job is to tie up the President (and his appointees) hand and foot so
they will look like fools if they say something or don't say
something, or make a decision or don't make a decision.  Silence, or
comment, becomes the SOURCE of raging, two week long, destructive
"analyses" to prove that the Executive is WRONG or is bungling
something.

The latest bit is the Democratic politician Barney Frank of Dukakis-
Kennedy territory.  Frank is fortunate, for the gay lobby in Congress
just got the Surgeon General to resign last summer because he could
not tell the public the truth about AIDS.  He had to follow the
recommendations of the queers and give the American public their
version of it.  The Surgeon General's conscience finally got to him,
so he did the only thing that a quitter could do:  he resigned.  The
truth still wasn't made public.

Here is William Buckley Jr.:

"We are left to understand that it simply doesn't matter if a
congressman has paid for homosexual sex.  Does it matter if a
congressman has paid for heterosexual sex?  {Ah, here comes the
Alexandrian Cult with its dual standards and dual authorities!}

"A few years ago a congressman (REPUBLICAN) from Illinois was revealed
to have had sex with a page who was a girl, at the same time that a
congressman from Massachusetts (DEMOCRAT) had had sex with a page who
was a boy.  The congressman from Illinois was defeated the next time
the voters had an opportunity to register their opinion of his
conduct.  The Democratic Senator from Massachusetts was returned with
a robust majority.

"What the two episodes conspired to say was something on the order of:
It's okay to take offense if a congressman seduces a girl, but not
okay to take offense if a congressman seduces a BOY, because the
latter gets in the way of `GAY LIBERATION.' It may very well be safer
POLITICALLY to have extramarital sex with a homosexual these days than
with a heterosexual."

Those are the leaders in America.  Those are the representatives of
someone who said they didn't want "taxation without representation."
You got it.  Sex perverts represent you in Congress, because it is
politically expedient.

By the same token it is safer to kill a white man than a black man; it
is safer POLITICALLY.  If a gang of blacks kill a white or put him in
the hospital, it is not a news headliner to be screamed about for a
week and then "followed up" and amplified and worked on until a law is
passed condemning THE POLICE FORCE to prison if they try to enforce
law and order.

The double standard of the Alexandrian Cult.  One version for the
people who believe it, and another one for those who don't believe it.
Both ends are played against the middle, which is the basic human
drive of self-survival:  me first, you next.  Final authority is your
opinions and preferences about the matter.  Nothing new about people
acting "safely"; Bob Jones and BBC have been doing it for years.