home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Collection of Education
/
collectionofeducationcarat1997.iso
/
HEALTH
/
MED9602.ZIP
/
M9620148.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-02-26
|
2KB
|
37 lines
Document 0148
DOCN M9620148
TI Are universal precautions realistic?
DT 9602
AU Gerberding JL; Lewis FR Jr; Schecter WP; University of California, San
Francisco, School of Medicine, USA.
SO Surg Clin North Am. 1995 Dec;75(6):1091-104. Unique Identifier :
AIDSLINE MED/96071858
AB In concluding whether universal precautions are necessary, it certainly
appears that we need something to reduce the significant problem of HIV
transmission to health-care providers. As occupational risk goes, it
exceeds the occupational risk of a number of other high-risk
professions. Unfortunately, we do not know if universal precautions are
effective. We also do not know the true compliance rate in use of
universal precautions, nor whether they have an impact on transmission
even if effectively used. What are the alternatives? They are not great,
but some have not been adequately explored or implemented.
Re-engineering around needle use in the hospital is clearly the most
likely area to produce concrete results, because needlesticks are
overwhelmingly the greatest source of infection, but this has not been
encouraged to the degree it could be, even with systems already
developed. Universal testing does not appear to be a viable alternative,
for numerous reasons already discussed. Finally, are universal
precautions more important for other pathogens than HIV? I would say
yes. Hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and nosocomial infections are more
important both as public health issues and as health-care provider
prevention issues. If universal precautions are effective in reducing
any of these, they are worthwhile.
DE Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/PREVENTION & CONTROL
Health Personnel Human HIV Infections/*PREVENTION & CONTROL HIV-1
Infection Control *Operating Rooms *Universal Precautions JOURNAL
ARTICLE REVIEW REVIEW, TUTORIAL
SOURCE: National Library of Medicine. NOTICE: This material may be
protected by Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.Code).