Hacker Chronicles 1/HACKER1.ISO/phrk3/phrack29.3

Text File | 1992-09-26 | 43KB | 712 lines

                                ==Phrack Inc.==

                     Volume Three, Issue 29, File #3 of 12

       <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
       <>                                                            <>
       <>           Introduction to the Internet Protocols           <>
       <>           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~           <>
       <>        Chapter Nine Of The Future Transcendent Saga        <>
       <>                                                            <>
       <>                    Part Two of Two Files                   <>
       <>                                                            <>
       <>                Presented by Knight Lightning               <>
       <>                     September 27, 1989                     <>
       <>                                                            <>
       <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>


Prologue - Part Two
~~~~~~~~
A great deal of the material in this file comes from "Introduction to the
Internet Protocols" by Charles L. Hedrick of Rutgers University.  That material
is copyrighted and is used in this file by permission.  Time differention and
changes in the wide area networks have made it neccessary for some details of
the file to updated and in some cases reworded for better understanding by our
readers.  Also, Unix is a trademark of AT&T Technologies, Inc. -- Again, just
thought I'd let you know.

Table of Contents - Part Two
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*  Introduction - Part Two
*  Well Known Sockets And The Applications Layer
*  Protocols Other Than TCP:  UDP and ICMP
*  Keeping Track Of Names And Information:  The Domain System
*  Routing
*  Details About The Internet Addresses:  Subnets And Broadcasting
*  Datagram Fragmentation And Reassembly
*  Ethernet Encapsulation:  ARP
*  Getting More Information


Introduction - Part Two
~~~~~~~~~~~~
This article is a brief introduction to TCP/IP, followed by suggestions on
what to read for more information.  This is not intended to be a complete
description, but it can give you a reasonable idea of the capabilities of the
protocols.  However, if you need to know any details of the technology, you
will want to read the standards yourself.

Throughout this file, you will find references to the standards, in the form of
"RFC" (Request For Comments) or "IEN" (Internet Engineering Notes) numbers --
these are document numbers.  The final section (Getting More Information)
explains how you can get copies of those standards.


Well-Known Sockets And The Applications Layer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In part one of this series, I described how a stream of data is broken up into
datagrams, sent to another computer, and put back together.  However something
more is needed in order to accomplish anything useful.  There has to be a way
for you to open a connection to a specified computer, log into it, tell it what
file you want, and control the transmission of the file.  (If you have a
different application in mind, e.g. computer mail, some analogous protocol is
needed.)  This is done by "application protocols."  The application protocols
run "on top" of TCP/IP.  That is, when they want to send a message, they give
the message to TCP.  TCP makes sure it gets delivered to the other end.
Because TCP and IP take care of all the networking details, the applications
protocols can treat a network connection as if it were a simple byte stream,
like a terminal or phone line.

Before going into more details about applications programs, we have to describe
how you find an application.  Suppose you want to send a file to a computer
whose Internet address is 128.6.4.7.  To start the process, you need more than
just the Internet address.  You have to connect to the FTP server at the other
end.  In general, network programs are specialized for a specific set of tasks.
Most systems have separate programs to handle file transfers, remote terminal
logins, mail, etc.  When you connect to 128.6.4.7, you have to specify that you
want to talk to the FTP server.  This is done by having "well-known sockets"
for each server.  Recall that TCP uses port numbers to keep track of individual
conversations.  User programs normally use more or less random port numbers.
However specific port numbers are assigned to the programs that sit waiting for
requests.  For example, if you want to send a file, you will start a program
called "ftp."  It will open a connection using some random number, say 1234,
for the port number on its end.  However it will specify port number 21 for the
other end.  This is the official port number for the FTP server.  Note that
there are two different programs involved.  You run ftp on your side.  This is
a program designed to accept commands from your terminal and pass them on to
the other end.  The program that you talk to on the other machine is the FTP
server.  It is designed to accept commands from the network connection, rather
than an interactive terminal.  There is no need for your program to use a
well-known socket number for itself.  Nobody is trying to find it.  However the
servers have to have well-known numbers, so that people can open connections to
them and start sending them commands.  The official port numbers for each
program are given in "Assigned Numbers."

Note that a connection is actually described by a set of 4 numbers:  The
Internet address at each end, and the TCP port number at each end.  Every
datagram has all four of those numbers in it.  (The Internet addresses are in
the IP header, and the TCP port numbers are in the TCP header.)  In order to
keep things straight, no two connections can have the same set of numbers.
However it is enough for any one number to be different.  For example, it is
perfectly possible for two different users on a machine to be sending files to
the same other machine.  This could result in connections with the following
parameters:

                     Internet addresses         TCP ports
      connection 1  128.6.4.194, 128.6.4.7      1234, 21
      connection 2  128.6.4.194, 128.6.4.7      1235, 21

Since the same machines are involved, the Internet addresses are the same.
Since they are both doing file transfers, one end of the connection involves
the well-known port number for FTP.  The only thing that differs is the port
number for the program that the users are running.  That's enough of a
difference.  Generally, at least one end of the connection asks the network
software to assign it a port number that is guaranteed to be unique.  Normally,
it's the user's end, since the server has to use a well-known number.

Now that we know how to open connections, let's get back to the applications
programs.  As mentioned earlier, once TCP has opened a connection, we have
something that might as well be a simple wire.  All the hard parts are handled
by TCP and IP.  However we still need some agreement as to what we send over
this connection.  In effect this is simply an agreement on what set of commands
the application will understand, and the format in which they are to be sent.
Generally, what is sent is a combination of commands and data.  They use
context to differentiate.  For example, the mail protocol works like this:
Your mail program opens a connection to the mail server at the other end.  Your
program gives it your machine's name, the sender of the message, and the
recipients you want it sent to.  It then sends a command saying that it is
starting the message.  At that point, the other end stops treating what it sees
as commands, and starts accepting the message.  Your end then starts sending
the text of the message.  At the end of the message, a special mark is sent (a
dot in the first column).  After that, both ends understand that your program
is again sending commands.  This is the simplest way to do things, and the one
that most applications use.

File transfer is somewhat more complex.  The file transfer protocol involves
two different connections.  It starts out just like mail.  The user's program
sends commands like "log me in as this user," "here is my password," "send me
the file with this name."  However once the command to send data is sent, a
second connection is opened for the data itself.  It would certainly be
possible to send the data on the same connection, as mail does.  However file
transfers often take a long time.  The designers of the file transfer protocol
wanted to allow the user to continue issuing commands while the transfer is
going on.  For example, the user might make an inquiry, or he might abort the
transfer.  Thus the designers felt it was best to use a separate connection for
the data and leave the original command connection for commands.  (It is also
possible to open command connections to two different computers, and tell them
to send a file from one to the other.  In that case, the data couldn't go over
the command connection.)

Remote terminal connections use another mechanism still.  For remote logins,
there is just one connection.  It normally sends data.  When it is necessary to
send a command (e.g. to set the terminal type or to change some mode), a
special character is used to indicate that the next character is a command.  If
the user happens to type that special character as data, two of them are sent.

I am not going to describe the application protocols in detail in this file.
It is better to read the RFCs yourself.  However there are a couple of common
conventions used by applications that will be described here.  First, the
common network representation:  TCP/IP is intended to be usable on any
computer.  Unfortunately, not all computers agree on how data is represented.

There are differences in character codes (ASCII vs. EBCDIC), in end of line
conventions (carriage return, line feed, or a representation using counts), and
in whether terminals expect characters to be sent individually or a line at a
time.  In order to allow computers of different kinds to communicate, each
applications protocol defines a standard representation.  Note that TCP and IP
do not care about the representation.  TCP simply sends octets.  However the
programs at both ends have to agree on how the octets are to be interpreted.

The RFC for each application specifies the standard representation for that
application.  Normally it is "net ASCII."  This uses ASCII characters, with end
of line denoted by a carriage return followed by a line feed.  For remote
login, there is also a definition of a "standard terminal," which turns out to
be a half-duplex terminal with echoing happening on the local machine.  Most
applications also make provisions for the two computers to agree on other
representations that they may find more convenient.  For example, PDP-10's have
36-bit words.  There is a way that two PDP-10's can agree to send a 36-bit
binary file.  Similarly, two systems that prefer full-duplex terminal
conversations can agree on that.  However each application has a standard
representation, which every machine must support.

So that you might get a better idea of what is involved in the application
protocols, here is an imaginary example of SMTP (the simple mail transfer
protocol.)  Assume that a computer called FTS.PHRACK.EDU wants to send the
following message.

   Date: Fri, 17 Nov 89 15:42:06 EDT
   From: [e-mail]
   To: [e-mail]
   Subject: Anniversary

   Four years is quite a long time to be around.  Happy Anniversary!

Note that the format of the message itself is described by an Internet standard
(RFC 822).  The standard specifies the fact that the message must be
transmitted as net ASCII (i.e. it must be ASCII, with carriage return/linefeed
to delimit lines).  It also describes the general structure, as a group of
header lines, then a blank line, and then the body of the message.  Finally, it
describes the syntax of the header lines in detail.  Generally they consist of
a keyword and then a value.

Note that the addressee is indicated as [e-mail].  Initially,
addresses were simply "person at machine."  Today's standards are much more
flexible.  There are now provisions for systems to handle other systems' mail.
This can allow automatic forwarding on behalf of computers not connected to the
Internet.  It can be used to direct mail for a number of systems to one central
mail server.  Indeed there is no requirement that an actual computer by the
name of FTS.PHRACK.EDU even exist (and it doesn't).  The name servers could be
set up so that you mail to department names, and each department's mail is
routed automatically to an appropriate computer.  It is also possible that the
part before the @ is something other than a user name.  It is possible for
programs to be set up to process mail.  There are also provisions to handle
mailing lists, and generic names such as "postmaster" or "operator."

The way the message is to be sent to another system is described by RFCs 821
and 974.  The program that is going to be doing the sending asks the name
server several queries to determine where to route the message.  The first
query is to find out which machines handle mail for the name FTS.PHRACK.EDU.
In this case, the server replies that FTS.PHRACK.EDU handles its own mail.  The
program then asks for the address of FTS.PHRACK.EDU, which for the sake of this
example is is 269.517.724.5.  Then the the mail program opens a TCP connection
to port 25 on 269.517.724.5.  Port 25 is the well-known socket used for
receiving mail.  Once this connection is established, the mail program starts
sending commands.  Here is a typical conversation.  Each line is labelled as to
whether it is from FTS or MSP.  Note that FTS initiated the connection:

     MSP    220 MSP.PHRACK.EDU SMTP Service at 17 Nov 89 09:35:24 EDT
     FTS    HELO fts.phrack.edu
     MSP    250 MSP.PHRACK.EDU - Hello, FTS.PHRACK.EDU
     FTS    MAIL From:<[e-mail]>
     MSP    250 MAIL accepted
     FTS    RCPT To:<[e-mail]>
     MSP    250 Recipient accepted
     FTS    DATA
     MSP    354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
     FTS    Date: Fri, 17 Nov 89 15:42:06 EDT
     FTS    From: [e-mail]
     FTS    To: [e-mail]
     FTS    Subject: Anniversary
     FTS
     FTS    Four years is quite a long time to be around.  Happy Anniversary!
     FTS    .
     MSP    250 OK
     FTS    QUIT
     MSP    221 MSP.PHRACK.EDU Service closing transmission channel

The commands all use normal text.  This is typical of the Internet standards.
Many of the protocols use standard ASCII commands.  This makes it easy to watch
what is going on and to diagnose problems.  The mail program keeps a log of
each conversation so if something goes wrong, the log file can simply be mailed
to the postmaster.  Since it is normal text, he can see what was going on.  It
also allows a human to interact directly with the mail server, for testing.

The responses all begin with numbers.  This is also typical of Internet
protocols.  The allowable responses are defined in the protocol.  The numbers
allow the user program to respond unambiguously.  The rest of the response is
text, which is normally for use by any human who may be watching or looking at
a log.  It has no effect on the operation of the programs.  The commands
themselves simply allow the mail program on one end to tell the mail server the
information it needs to know in order to deliver the message.  In this case,
the mail server could get the information by looking at the message itself.

Every session must begin with a HELO, which gives the name of the system that
initiated the connection.  Then the sender and recipients are specified.  There
can be more than one RCPT command, if there are several recipients.  Finally
the data itself is sent.  Note that the text of the message is terminated by a
line containing just a period, but if such a line appears in the message, the
period is doubled.  After the message is accepted, the sender can send another
message, or terminate the session as in the example above.

Generally, there is a pattern to the response numbers.  The protocol defines
the specific set of responses that can be sent as answers to any given command.
However programs that don't want to analyze them in detail can just look at the
first digit.  In general, responses that begin with a 2 indicate success.
Those that begin with 3 indicate that some further action is needed, as shown
above.  4 and 5 indicate errors.  4 is a "temporary" error, such as a disk
filling.  The message should be saved, and tried again later.  5 is a permanent
error, such as a non-existent recipient.  The message should be returned to the
sender with an error message.

For more details about the protocols mentioned in this section, see RFCs
821/822 for mail, RFC 959 for file transfer, and RFCs 854/855 for remote
logins.  For the well-known port numbers, see the current edition of Assigned
Numbers, and possibly RFC 814.


Protocols Other Than TCP:  UDP and ICMP
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thus far only connections that use TCP have been described.  Remember that TCP
is responsible for breaking up messages into datagrams, and reassembling them
properly.  However in many applications, there are messages that will always
fit in a single datagram.  An example is name lookup.  When a user attempts to
make a connection to another system, he will generally specify the system by
name, rather than Internet address.  His system has to translate that name to
an address before it can do anything.  Generally, only a few systems have the
database used to translate names to addresses.  So the user's system will want
to send a query to one of the systems that has the database.

This query is going to be very short.  It will certainly fit in one datagram.
So will the answer.  Thus it seems silly to use TCP.  Of course TCP does more
than just break things up into datagrams.  It also makes sure that the data
arrives, resending datagrams where necessary.  But for a question that fits in
a single datagram, all of the complexity of TCP is not needed.  If there is not
an answer after a few seconds, you can just ask again.  For applications like
this, there are alternatives to TCP.

The most common alternative is UDP ("user datagram protocol").  UDP is designed
for applications where you don't need to put sequences of datagrams together.
It fits into the system much like TCP.  There is a UDP header.  The network
software puts the UDP header on the front of your data, just as it would put a
TCP header on the front of your data.  Then UDP sends the data to IP, which
adds the IP header, putting UDP's protocol number in the protocol field instead
of TCP's protocol number.

UDP doesn't do as much as TCP does.  It does not split data into multiple
datagrams and it does not keep track of what it has sent so it can resend if
necessary.  About all that UDP provides is port numbers so that several
programs can use UDP at once.  UDP port numbers are used just like TCP port
numbers.  There are well-known port numbers for servers that use UDP.

The UDP header is shorter than a TCP header.  It still has source and
destination port numbers, and a checksum, but that's about it.  UDP is used by
the protocols that handle name lookups (see IEN 116, RFC 882, and RFC 883) and
a number of similar protocols.

Another alternative protocol is ICMP ("Internet control message protocol").
ICMP is used for error messages, and other messages intended for the TCP/IP
software itself, rather than any particular user program.  For example, if you
attempt to connect to a host, your system may get back an ICMP message saying
"host unreachable."  ICMP can also be used to find out some information about
the network.  See RFC 792 for details of ICMP.

ICMP is similar to UDP, in that it handles messages that fit in one datagram.
However it is even simpler than UDP.  It does not even have port numbers in its
header.  Since all ICMP messages are interpreted by the network software
itself, no port numbers are needed to say where an ICMP message is supposed to
go.


Keeping Track Of Names And Information:  The Domain System
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As we indicated earlier, the network software generally needs a 32-bit Internet
address in order to open a connection or send a datagram.  However users prefer
to deal with computer names rather than numbers.  Thus there is a database that
allows the software to look up a name and find the corresponding number.

When the Internet was small, this was easy.  Each system would have a file that
listed all of the other systems, giving both their name and number.  There are
now too many computers for this approach to be practical.  Thus these files
have been replaced by a set of name servers that keep track of host names and
the corresponding Internet addresses.  (In fact these servers are somewhat more
general than that.  This is just one kind of information stored in the domain
system.)  A set of interlocking servers are used rather than a single central
one.

There are now so many different institutions connected to the Internet that it
would be impractical for them to notify a central authority whenever they
installed or moved a computer.  Thus naming authority is delegated to
individual institutions.  The name servers form a tree, corresponding to
institutional structure. The names themselves follow a similar structure.  A
typical example is the name BORAX.LCS.MIT.EDU.  This is a computer at the
Laboratory for Computer Science (LCS) at MIT.  In order to find its Internet
address, you might potentially have to consult 4 different servers.

First, you would ask a central server (called the root) where the EDU server
is.  EDU is a server that keeps track of educational institutions.  The root
server would give you the names and Internet addresses of several servers for
EDU.  You would then ask EDU where the server for MIT is.  It would give you
names and Internet addresses of several servers for MIT.  Then you would ask
MIT where the server for LCS is, and finally you would ask one of the LCS
servers about BORAX.  The final result would be the Internet address for
BORAX.LCS.MIT.EDU.  Each of these levels is referred to as a "domain."  The
entire name, BORAX.LCS.MIT.EDU, is called a "domain name."  (So are the names
of the higher-level domains, such as LCS.MIT.EDU, MIT.EDU, and EDU.)

Fortunately, you don't really have to go through all of this most of the time.
First of all, the root name servers also happen to be the name servers for the
top-level domains such as EDU.  Thus a single query to a root server will get
you to MIT.  Second, software generally remembers answers that it got before.
So once we look up a name at LCS.MIT.EDU, our software remembers where to find
servers for LCS.MIT.EDU, MIT.EDU, and EDU.  It also remembers the translation
of BORAX.LCS.MIT.EDU.  Each of these pieces of information has a "time to live"
associated with it.  Typically this is a few days.  After that, the information
expires and has to be looked up again.  This allows institutions to change
things.

The domain system is not limited to finding out Internet addresses.  Each
domain name is a node in a database.  The node can have records that define a
number of different properties.  Examples are Internet address, computer type,
and a list of services provided by a computer.  A program can ask for a
specific piece of information, or all information about a given name.  It is
possible for a node in the database to be marked as an "alias" (or nickname)
for another node.  It is also possible to use the domain system to store
information about users, mailing lists, or other objects.

There is an Internet standard defining the operation of these databases as well
as the protocols used to make queries of them.  Every network utility has to be
able to make such queries since this is now the official way to evaluate host
names.  Generally utilities will talk to a server on their own system.  This
server will take care of contacting the other servers for them.  This keeps
down the amount of code that has to be in each application program.

The domain system is particularly important for handling computer mail.  There
are entry types to define what computer handles mail for a given name to
specify where an individual is to receive mail and to define mailing lists.

See RFCs 882, 883, and 973 for specifications of the domain system.  RFC 974
defines the use of the domain system in sending mail.

Routing
~~~~~~~
The task of finding how to get a datagram to its destination is referred to as
"routing."  Many of the details depend upon the particular implementation.
However some general things can be said.

It is necessary to understand the model on which IP is based.  IP assumes that
a system is attached to some local network.  It is assumed that the system can
send datagrams to any other system on its own network.  (In the case of
Ethernet, it simply finds the Ethernet address of the destination system, and
puts the datagram out on the Ethernet.)  The problem comes when a system is
asked to send a datagram to a system on a different network.  This problem is
handled by gateways.

A gateway is a system that connects a network with one or more other networks.
Gateways are often normal computers that happen to have more than one network
interface.  The software on a machine must be set up so that it will forward
datagrams from one network to the other.  That is, if a machine on network
128.6.4 sends a datagram to the gateway, and the datagram is addressed to a
machine on network 128.6.3, the gateway will forward the datagram to the
destination.  Major communications centers often have gateways that connect a
number of different networks.

Routing in IP is based entirely upon the network number of the destination
address.  Each computer has a table of network numbers.  For each network
number, a gateway is listed.  This is the gateway to be used to get to that
network.  The gateway does not have to connect directly to the network, it just
has to be the best place to go to get there.

When a computer wants to send a datagram, it first checks to see if the
destination address is on the system's own local network.  If so, the datagram
can be sent directly.  Otherwise, the system expects to find an entry for the
network that the destination address is on.  The datagram is sent to the
gateway listed in that entry.  This table can get quite big.  For example, the
Internet now includes several hundred individual networks.  Thus various
strategies have been developed to reduce the size of the routing table.  One
strategy is to depend upon "default routes."  There is often only one gateway
out of a network.

This gateway might connect a local Ethernet to a campus-wide backbone network.
In that case, it is not neccessary to have a separate entry for every network
in the world.  That gateway is simply defined as a "default."  When no specific
route is found for a datagram, the datagram is sent to the default gateway.  A
default gateway can even be used when there are several gateways on a network.
There are provisions for gateways to send a message saying "I'm not the best
gateway -- use this one instead."  (The message is sent via ICMP.  See RFC
792.)  Most network software is designed to use these messages to add entries
to their routing tables.  Suppose network 128.6.4 has two gateways, 128.6.4.59
and 128.6.4.1.  128.6.4.59 leads to several other internal Rutgers networks.
128.6.4.1 leads indirectly to the NSFnet.  Suppose 128.6.4.59 is set as a
default gateway, and there are no other routing table entries.  Now what
happens when you need to send a datagram to MIT?  MIT is network 18.  Since
there is no entry for network 18, the datagram will be sent to the default,
128.6.4.59.  This gateway is the wrong one.  So it will forward the datagram to
128.6.4.1.  It will also send back an error saying in effect:  "to get to
network 18, use 128.6.4.1."  The software will then add an entry to the routing
table.  Any future datagrams to MIT will then go directly to 128.6.4.1.  (The
error message is sent using the ICMP protocol.  The message type is called
"ICMP redirect.")

Most IP experts recommend that individual computers should not try to keep
track of the entire network.  Instead, they should start with default gateways
and let the gateways tell them the routes as just described.  However this
doesn't say how the gateways should find out about the routes.  The gateways
can't depend upon this strategy.  They have to have fairly complete routing
tables.  For this, some sort of routing protocol is needed.  A routing protocol
is simply a technique for the gateways to find each other and keep up to date
about the best way to get to every network.  RFC 1009 contains a review of
gateway design and routing.


Details About Internet Addresses:  Subnets And Broadcasting
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Internet addresses are 32-bit numbers, normally written as 4 octets (in
decimal), e.g. 128.6.4.7.  There are actually 3 different types of address.
The problem is that the address has to indicate both the network and the host
within the network.  It was felt that eventually there would be lots of
networks.  Many of them would be small, but probably 24 bits would be needed to
represent all the IP networks.  It was also felt that some very big networks
might need 24 bits to represent all of their hosts.  This would seem to lead to
48 bit addresses.  But the designers really wanted to use 32 bit addresses.  So
they adopted a kludge.  The assumption is that most of the networks will be
small.  So they set up three different ranges of address.

Addresses beginning with 1 to 126 use only the first octet for the network
number.  The other three octets are available for the host number.  Thus 24
bits are available for hosts.  These numbers are used for large networks, but
there can only be 126 of these.  The ARPAnet is one and there are a few large
commercial networks.  But few normal organizations get one of these "class A"
addresses.

For normal large organizations, "class B" addresses are used.  Class B
addresses use the first two octets for the network number.  Thus network
numbers are 128.1 through 191.254.  (0 and 255 are avoided for reasons to be
explained below.  Addresses beginning with 127 are also avoided because they
are used by some systems for special purposes.)  The last two octets are
available for host addesses, giving 16 bits of host address.  This allows for
64516 computers, which should be enough for most organizations.  Finally, class
C addresses use three octets in the range 192.1.1 to 223.254.254.  These allow
only 254 hosts on each network, but there can be lots of these networks.
Addresses above 223 are reserved for future use as class D and E (which are
currently not defined).

0 and 255 have special meanings.  0 is reserved for machines that do not know
their address.  In certain circumstances it is possible for a machine not to
know the number of the network it is on, or even its own host address.  For
example, 0.0.0.23 would be a machine that knew it was host number 23, but
didn't know on what network.

255 is used for "broadcast."  A broadcast is a message that you want every
system on the network to see.  Broadcasts are used in some situations where you
don't know who to talk to.  For example, suppose you need to look up a host
name and get its Internet address.  Sometimes you don't know the address of the
nearest name server.  In that case, you might send the request as a broadcast.
There are also cases where a number of systems are interested in information.
It is then less expensive to send a single broadcast than to send datagrams
individually to each host that is interested in the information.  In order to
send a broadcast, you use an address that is made by using your network
address, with all ones in the part of the address where the host number goes.
For example, if you are on network 128.6.4, you would use 128.6.4.255 for
broadcasts.  How this is actually implemented depends upon the medium.  It is
not possible to send broadcasts on the ARPAnet, or on point to point lines, but
it is possible on an Ethernet.  If you use an Ethernet address with all its
bits on (all ones), every machine on the Ethernet is supposed to look at that
datagram.

Because 0 and 255 are used for unknown and broadcast addresses, normal hosts
should never be given addresses containing 0 or 255.  Addresses should never
begin with 0, 127, or any number above 223.


Datagram Fragmentation And Reassembly
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TCP/IP is designed for use with many different kinds of networks.
Unfortunately, network designers do not agree about how big packets can be.
Ethernet packets can be 1500 octets long.  ARPAnet packets have a maximum of
around 1000 octets.  Some very fast networks have much larger packet sizes.
You might think that IP should simply settle on the smallest possible size, but
this would cause serious performance problems.  When transferring large files,
big packets are far more efficient than small ones.  So it is best to be able
to use the largest packet size possible, but it is also necessary to be able to
handle networks with small limits.  There are two provisions for this.

TCP has the ability to "negotiate" about datagram size.  When a TCP connection
first opens, both ends can send the maximum datagram size they can handle.  The
smaller of these numbers is used for the rest of the connection.  This allows
two implementations that can handle big datagrams to use them, but also lets
them talk to implementations that cannot handle them.  This does not completely
solve the problem.  The most serious problem is that the two ends do not
necessarily know about all of the steps in between.  For this reason, there are
provisions to split datagrams up into pieces.  This is referred to as
"fragmentation."

The IP header contains fields indicating that a datagram has been split and
enough information to let the pieces be put back together.  If a gateway
connects an Ethernet to the Arpanet, it must be prepared to take 1500-octet
Ethernet packets and split them into pieces that will fit on the Arpanet.
Furthermore, every host implementation of TCP/IP must be prepared to accept
pieces and put them back together.  This is referred to as "reassembly."

TCP/IP implementations differ in the approach they take to deciding on datagram
size.  It is fairly common for implementations to use 576-byte datagrams
whenever they can't verify that the entire path is able to handle larger
packets.  This rather conservative strategy is used because of the number of
implementations with bugs in the code to reassemble fragments.  Implementors
often try to avoid ever having fragmentation occur.  Different implementors
take different approaches to deciding when it is safe to use large datagrams.
Some use them only for the local network.  Others will use them for any network
on the same campus.  576 bytes is a "safe" size which every implementation must
support.

Ethernet Encapsulation:  ARP
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Part One of Introduction to the Internet Protocols (Phrack Inc., Volume
Three, Issue 28, File #3 of 12) there was a brief description about what IP
datagrams look like on an Ethernet.  The discription showed the Ethernet header
and checksum, but it left one hole:  It did not say how to figure out what
Ethernet address to use when you want to talk to a given Internet address.
There is a separate protocol for this called ARP ("address resolution
protocol") and it is not an IP protocal as ARP datagrams do not have IP
headers.

Suppose you are on system 128.6.4.194 and you want to connect to system
128.6.4.7.  Your system will first verify that 128.6.4.7 is on the same
network, so it can talk directly via Ethernet.  Then it will look up 128.6.4.7
in its ARP table to see if it already knows the Ethernet address.  If so, it
will stick on an Ethernet header and send the packet.  Now suppose this system
is not in the ARP table.  There is no way to send the packet because you need
the Ethernet address.  So it uses the ARP protocol to send an ARP request.
Essentially an ARP request says "I need the Ethernet address for 128.6.4.7".
Every system listens to ARP requests.  When a system sees an ARP request for
itself, it is required to respond.  So 128.6.4.7 will see the request and will
respond with an ARP reply saying in effect "128.6.4.7 is 8:0:20:1:56:34".  Your
system will save this information in its ARP table so future packets will go
directly.

ARP requests must be sent as "broadcasts."  There is no way that an ARP request
can be sent directly to the right system because the whole reason for sending
an ARP request is that you do not know the Ethernet address.  So an Ethernet
address of all ones is used, i.e. ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff.  By convention, every
machine on the Ethernet is required to pay attention to packets with this as an
address.  So every system sees every ARP requests.  They all look to see
whether the request is for their own address.  If so, they respond.  If not,
they could just ignore it, although some hosts will use ARP requests to update
their knowledge about other hosts on the network, even if the request is not
for them.  Packets whose IP address indicates broadcast (e.g. 255.255.255.255
or 128.6.4.255) are also sent with an Ethernet address that is all ones.


Getting More Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This directory contains documents describing the major protocols.  There are
hundreds of documents, so I have chosen the ones that seem most important.
Internet standards are called RFCs (Request for Comments).  A proposed standard
is initially issued as a proposal, and given an RFC number.  When it is finally
accepted, it is added to Official Internet Protocols, but it is still referred
to by the RFC number.  I have also included two IENs (Internet Engineering
Notes).  IENs used to be a separate classification for more informal
documents, but this classification no longer exists and RFCs are now used for
all official Internet documents with a mailing list being used for more
informal reports.

The convention is that whenever an RFC is revised, the revised version gets a
new number.  This is fine for most purposes, but it causes problems with two
documents:  Assigned Numbers and Official Internet Protocols.  These documents
are being revised all the time and the RFC number keeps changing.  You will
have to look in rfc-index.txt to find the number of the latest edition.  Anyone
who is seriously interested in TCP/IP should read the RFC describing IP (791).
RFC 1009 is also useful as it is a specification for gateways to be used by
NSFnet and it contains an overview of a lot of the TCP/IP technology.

Here is a list of the documents you might want:

     rfc-index List of all RFCs
     rfc1012   Somewhat fuller list of all RFCs
     rfc1011   Official Protocols.  It's useful to scan this to see what tasks
               protocols have been built for.  This defines which RFCs are
               actual standards, as opposed to requests for comments.
     rfc1010   Assigned Numbers.  If you are working with TCP/IP, you will
               probably want a hardcopy of this as a reference.  It lists all
               the offically defined well-known ports and lots of other
               things.
     rfc1009   NSFnet gateway specifications.  A good overview of IP routing
               and gateway technology.
     rfc1001/2 NetBIOS:  Networking for PCs
     rfc973    Update on domains
     rfc959    FTP (file transfer)
     rfc950    Subnets
     rfc937    POP2:  Protocol for reading mail on PCs
     rfc894    How IP is to be put on Ethernet, see also rfc825
     rfc882/3  Domains (the database used to go from host names to Internet
               address and back -- also used to handle UUCP these days).  See
               also rfc973
     rfc854/5  Telnet - Protocol for remote logins
     rfc826    ARP - Protocol for finding out Ethernet addresses
     rfc821/2  Mail
     rfc814    Names and ports - General concepts behind well-known ports
     rfc793    TCP
     rfc792    ICMP
     rfc791    IP
     rfc768    UDP
     rip.doc   Details of the most commonly-used routing protocol
     ien-116   Old name server (still needed by several kinds of systems)
     ien-48    The Catenet model, general description of the philosophy behind
               TCP/IP

The following documents are somewhat more specialized.

     rfc813    Window and acknowledgement strategies in TCP
     rfc815    Datagram reassembly techniques
     rfc816    Fault isolation and resolution techniques
     rfc817    Modularity and efficiency in implementation
     rfc879    The maximum segment size option in TCP
     rfc896    Congestion control
     rfc827,888,904,975,985    EGP and related issues

The most important RFCs have been collected into a three-volume set, the DDN
Protocol Handbook.  It is available from the DDN Network Information Center at
SRI International.  You should be able to get them via anonymous FTP from
SRI-NIC.ARPA.  The file names are:

   RFCs:
     rfc:rfc-index.txt
     rfc:rfcxxx.txt
   IENs:
     ien:ien-index.txt
     ien:ien-xxx.txt

 Sites with access to UUCP, but not FTP may be able to retreive them via
 UUCP from UUCP host rutgers.  The file names would be

   RFCs:
     /topaz/pub/pub/tcp-ip-docs/rfc-index.txt
     /topaz/pub/pub/tcp-ip-docs/rfcxxx.txt
   IENs:
     /topaz/pub/pub/tcp-ip-docs/ien-index.txt
     /topaz/pub/pub/tcp-ip-docs/ien-xxx.txt
_______________________________________________________________________________

Downloaded From P-80 International Information Systems 304-744-2253 12yrs+