home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Hidden Truth / Hidden Truth.iso / data / newspostings / reports / 401-500 / 432 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-06-19  |  2.0 KB
  1. Path: news.demon.co.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.be.innet.net!INbe.net!news.nl.innet.net!INnl.net!hunter.premier.net!insync!news.azstarnet.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!news.texas.net!nntp.primenet.com!news.cais.net!world1.bawave.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!fc.hp.com!news
  2. From: Jim Rogers <jfr@fc.hp.com>
  3. Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.science
  4. Subject: Re: Are all UFO debunkers rabid crackpots?
  5. Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 14:10:13 -0600
  6. Organization: Archaeological (lower strata contain older files)
  7. Lines: 13
  8. Message-ID: <31C85EA5.E47@fc.hp.com>
  9. References: <31C5A845.1319@compuserve.com> <4q4dll$rlk@cwis-20.wayne.edu> <31C5DC53.14D0@students.wisc.edu> <4q527r$g3b@cwis-20.wayne.edu> <31C63394.7AB6@students.wisc.edu> <Dt89DA.EJA@eskimo.com> <31C79A13.3389@students.wisc.edu>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: hpesjfr.fc.hp.com
  11. Mime-Version: 1.0
  12. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  13. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  14. X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.03 9000/735)
  15. Xref: news.demon.co.uk alt.alien.visitors:88440 alt.paranet.ufo:53818 alt.alien.research:26204 alt.ufo.reports:9505 alt.paranet.abduct:5885 sci.skeptic:72719 alt.paranet.science:3214
  16.  
  17. Brian Zeiler wrote:
  18. .....
  19. > Typical skeptic post with a total lack of substance and logic.  Mike
  20. > thinks that alien visitation implies physical proof, and then he
  21. > considers the lack of physical proof as a disproof of visitation.  That
  22. > way, he can fallaciously ignore the other evidence for physical objects
  23. > under intelligent control with propulsions that humans cannot duplicate.
  24.  
  25. No, Brian, you're the one who's regularly constructing that sort of logical 
  26. rationale. Mike said nothing of the sort. Lack of evidence is lack of 
  27. evidence, it's not "disproof," nor did he claim it was. 
  28.  
  29. Jim
  30.