home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.demon.co.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!weld.news.pipex.net!pipex!hole.news.pipex.net!pipex!tube.news.pipex.net!pipex!lade.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.be.innet.net!INbe.net!news.nl.innet.net!INnl.net!hunter.premier.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!aanews.merit.net!cwis-20.wayne.edu!pookie.pass.wayne.edu!mje
- From: mje@pookie.pass.wayne.edu (Michael Edelman)
- Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.science
- Subject: Re: Are all UFO debunkers rabid crackpots?
- Followup-To: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.alien.research,alt.ufo.reports,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic,alt.paranet.science
- Date: 20 Jun 1996 17:59:20 GMT
- Organization: Wayne State University
- Lines: 17
- Message-ID: <4qc3ho$e7e@cwis-20.wayne.edu>
- References: <31C5A845.1319@compuserve.com> <4q4dll$rlk@cwis-20.wayne.edu> <31C5DC53.14D0@students.wisc.edu> <4q527r$g3b@cwis-20.wayne.edu> <31C63394.7AB6@students.wisc.edu> <Dt89DA.EJA@eskimo.com> <31C79A13.3389@students.wisc.edu> <4q8u0n$joo@cwis-20.wayne.edu> <31C845B4.6AE2@students.wisc.edu> <009A4180.13EF24E0@usuhsb.usuhs.mil> <31C8AD75.7EDB@students.wisc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pookie.pass.wayne.edu
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
- Xref: news.demon.co.uk alt.alien.visitors:88632 alt.paranet.ufo:53938 alt.alien.research:26297 alt.ufo.reports:9555 alt.paranet.abduct:5918 sci.skeptic:72979 alt.paranet.science:3239
-
- Brian Zeiler (bdzeiler@students.wisc.edu) wrote:
-
- : This is the interesting aspect, Occam's Razor. The UFO debunkers think
- : they understand Occam's Razor, but in reality, they haven't a clue as to
- : what the heuristic means. It really means that when several
- : hypotheses can adequately explain a body of data, the simplest
- : hypothesis which invokes the fewest implicit premises should be
- : tested first before moving down the hierarchy of complexity.
-
- Close, but no bananna, Bonzo.
-
- Occam told us that we should not posit any unseen entities in formulating
- our hypotheses unless necessary. Of course, that's a subjective call; to
- you, invoking aliens to explain simple phenomena comes under the heading
- of "absolute necessity" ;-)
-
- --mike
-