Day 017 - 25 Jul 94 - Page 14


     
     1        that from the last part of the abstract; is that right?
              A.  That is right, yes.
     2
         Q.   This particular paper appears to have been based on some
     3        case controlled studies, is that correct?
              A.  That is right.
     4
         Q.   Can I just read some part of the abstract:  "Incidence
     5        rates for many sites of cancer show wide variations among
              the main ethnic groups in Hawaii (Caucasians, Japanese,
     6        Chinese, Filipinos, and Hawaiians).  Major shifts in
              cancer rates among migrants to the islands suggest that
     7        environmental factors are at least in part responsible for
              these variations.  One prominent area of difference among
     8        these ethnic populations is their diets, which can vary
              substantially, not only in the consumption of particular
     9        food items but also in mean nutrient intakes.
 
    10        In aggregate correlational analyses based on data from
              representative samples of these ethnic groups and
    11        corresponding population-based cancer incidence rates, we
              found significant associations between ethnic-sex-specific
    12        intakes of dietary fat (including total fat, as well as
              animal, saturated, and unsaturated fats) and breast,
    13        endometrial, and prostrate cancers.  Animal protein intake
              showed associations similar to those for dietary fat, but
    14        these two nutrients were highly correlated in the data.
              Cholesterol intake showed significant correlations with
    15        lung and laryngeal cancers. Analyses of both nutrient and
              food item data suggested an association of stomach cancer
    16        incidence with the consumption of fish products,
              particularly dried/salted fish, and with a lower intake of
    17        vitamin C.
 
    18        Preliminary findings from ongoing case-control studies
              showed the following relationships:  An inverse
    19        association between lung cancer risk and the intake of
              food sources of vitamin A, especially foods containing
    20        carotenes; an inverse association between cancers of the
              lower urinary tract and vitamin A consumption, especially
    21        from supplements; a positive association between prostrate
              cancer risk and dietary fat intake in men above the age of
    22        69, but not in younger men; and a positive association
              between breast cancer risk and the intake of dietary fat
    23        (particularly saturated fat) and animal protein in
              postmenopausal women, especially the Japanese.
    24
              Two large cohorts (50,000 and 5,000 subjects) on whom
    25        dietary information was collected between 1975 and 1980
              are being followed prospectively for their occurrence of 
    26        cancer". 
  
    27        Dr. Arnott, this is one of a number of papers among many.
              You have read it.  You, no doubt, read it more or less at
    28        the time it came out in 1983.  What reliable conclusions
              can a responsible medical man draw from this kind of
    29        evidence?
              A.  One of the problems with case control studies is how
    30        the controls have actually been selected.  This is a real
              problem in any study of this nature.  Often the controls

Prev Next Index