Day 022 - 12 Sep 94 - Page 07


     
     1        A.  It depends which cancer you are talking about.  As far
     2        as breast cancer is concerned, I think that we do not know
     3        the answer to this.  But certainly it does appear that
     4        those women who develop breast cancer and are obese have a
     5        worst outlook.  We have discussed this point already.  As
     6        far as colorectal cancer is concerned, again the evidence
     7        is conflicting because you can find one study that, for
     8        example, shows an association with, say, fat intake and
     9        the development of colorectal cancer, and then you will
    10        find another study which, well conducted, does not show
    11        any association.  There is no consistency in the finding.
    12
    13        But, perhaps, the dietary factor which does have the
    14        strongest association is that fruits and vegetables,
    15        grains, probably exert a protective effect.  But again
    16        that is by no means absolute because again some studies
    17        have not shown this effect.  This is the problem that you
    18        can -- the evidence is controversial.
    19
    20   Q.   But it is also true to say that you have not shown cause
    21        and effect for some of the other factors you mentioned?
    22        A.  All of these studies are epidemiological;
    23        epidemiological studies are observational.  It is,
    24        therefore, very difficult, unless the evidence is
    25        absolutely cast iron or very strong indeed, to show cause
    26        and effect -- for example, the strongest epidemiological
    27        study looked at cigarette smoking in the development of
    28        lung cancer.  There was such a consistency of finding
    29        there that one could say that cigarettes were involved in
    30        the causation of lung cancer, but that did not necessarily
    31        show you what actually caused the lung cancer, what it was
    32        in cigarettes that caused lung cancer; it took some
    33        further research to suggest it might be the tars.
    34
    35   Q.   We have not got to the position where we can say for
    36        certain that you can show cause and effect in relation to
    37        smoking and lung cancer?
    38        A.  It is likely to be the tars in the cigarettes, but
    39        that is the closest one can say.
    40
    41   Q.   We do not know for definite?
    42        A.  We do not absolutely know.
    43
    44   Q.   Would you agree that there is a large body of medical
    45        scientific opinion that does think there are dietary
    46        factors involved in these cancers?
    47        A.  There is certainly a body of evidence, of people who
    48        feel that there is likely to be some dietary factor which
    49        may be involved in the development of breast and colon
    50        cancer, but I think what cannot be said is that we know 
    51        what that dietary factor is.  You see, we have talked 
    52        about this already, that this migration of people -- it is 
    53        very easy, for example, to look at fat consumption because
    54        it is easy to register, or relatively easy to register,
    55        the amount of fat which is produced in a country or
    56        apparently used in a country and incidence of, say, breast
    57        or colorectal cancer.
    58
    59        But when you actually look at carefully controlled
    60        studies, such as prospective studies which have looked at

Prev Next Index