Day 022 - 12 Sep 94 - Page 16
1 some of these studies are particularly well conducted.
2 They are prospective studies where they have tried to
3 reduce or avoid bias creeping into the results. If you
4 have been involved with any kind of clinical trial or
5 experiment, it is very easy for bias to creep into these
6 things, so prospective studies are the ones where one gets
7 the best information about possible linkages with diet and
8 cancer.
9
10 Q. Yes.
11 A. The previous document ----.
12
13 Q. What I am saying is, as far as this pamphlet is concerned,
14 they seem to be putting their cards on the table as
15 regards fat intake as being particularly associated?
16 A. I think you have to read the whole thing in context
17 because it says, "An association has been described
18 between dietary factors". In other words -- and then they
19 go on to say, "Fat intake has been particularly associated
20 with cancer of the breast" and so on. So it is relating
21 to the previous sentence, which is that an association has
22 been described. That is what they are commenting on.
23 They then go on to say that the evidence has been derived
24 from animal studies and epidemiological data.
25
26 Q. So the evidence of links between fat intake and those
27 cancers comes from animal studies and human
28 epidemiological data?
29 A. That is right.
30
31 Q. But there is another area of evidence which is what you
32 called "prospective"?
33 A. Yes.
34
35 Q. Prospective?
36 A. Prospective, yes.
37
38 Q. Which is not conclusive; it is controversial.
39
40 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Is that not epidemiological as well?
41 A. It is epidemiological as well. All the data relating
42 diet to cancer are epidemiological, which are
43 observational data.
44
45 MR. MORRIS: They seem pretty -- so their position is slightly
46 more certain than yours then?
47 A. I do not think you can say that from this. They are
48 saying it has been reported that there is an association,
49 and they say that the evidence to support this comes from
50 animal studies and epidemiological data.
51
52 Q. Right.
53 A. They are just saying that there has been a suggestion
54 there might be an association; they are not saying any
55 more than that.
56
57 Q. That may be one interpretation of it; I will not go into
58 the other details.
59
60 MR. JUSTICE BELL: The references they give are Doll in 1975