Day 057 - 29 Nov 94 - Page 04


     
     1        the word "cause" was only mentioned 20 times.  Having gone
     2        through them, having gone through those 20 that are listed,
     3        only 10 of them are instances of me and Mr. Morris using
     4        the word "cause" and not all of them were relevant to
     5        cancer.
     6
     7        I would say that is a very clear indication that we were
     8        not concentrating on "cause" as the issue because, as
     9        I said last week, the words "association", "relationship"
    10        and "link" came up probably about 200 or so times during
    11        cross-examination.
    12
    13   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.  It was apparent, though, was it not, in
    14        some of those cases when at least where "association",
    15        "relationship" or "link" was used, that the witness was
    16        using it as causal association, causal relationship or
    17        causal link?  The words "link" or "relationship" or
    18        "association" were used on certain occasions.  I asked
    19        him, in effect, whether that was causal link.  The answer
    20        was "yes" and the witness went back to just using the word
    21        "link" again.  But it was clear it was a causal link on
    22        some of those occasions that the witness was considering.
    23
    24   MS. STEEL:  It may be now, but if I can say so, at the time, as
    25        far as we were concerned, the word "link"" was the
    26        important word and we did not go as far as we would have
    27        gone had we known that cause was the only type of link that
    28        mattered as far as what the issue in the case was.
    29
    30        I think it is different looking back on what it may appear
    31        to read now as well to our state of mind at the time.
    32        I accept that in some instances it could look as though
    33        that was what we were concentrating on, but that is not in
    34        fact the case.  The fact is that, as far as we were
    35        concerned, it was link that mattered.  As I say, cause is
    36        one type of link, but there were others as well.
    37
    38   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Do you want to try again, in case I have
    39        missed something, explaining in your own words what kind of
    40        link in relation to diet and disease, leave aside "meal"
    41        for a moment, because the use of "diet" and "meal", I am
    42        conscious of the different words, so just focus on "diet"
    43        for the moment.  You see, it might help you if I put it
    44        this way, that bearing in mind the "McCancer", "McDisease"
    45        and perhaps "McDeadly", bearing in mind the cartoon which
    46        has a hamburger devouring a cow, or a steer, which is
    47        referring to a slaughterhouse which is where steers are
    48        killed, at one end and devouring a person at the other,
    49        bearing in mind the heading "What's so healthy about
    50        McDonald's food?" and bearing in mind what actually appears 
    51        in the whole of the relevant parts of the text, I have to 
    52        say that, while not forming a final view, I find it 
    53        difficult to see how the leaflet, being realistic, can mean
    54        other than that a diet high in fat etc. Is causally linked
    55        with cancers of the breast and bowel and heart disease, and
    56        that McDonald's meals which fit that description are also,
    57        therefore, causally linked with cancers of the breast and
    58        bowel and heart disease in some way.
    59
    60        It may be that the meaning is that if you eat enough

Prev Next Index