Day 062 - 06 Dec 94 - Page 07


     
     1        aspects.
     2
     3   Q.   I expect you are aware that the McDonald's Corporation in
     4        America undertook with the Environmental Defence Fund, a
     5        joint Task Force, a review of this question of polystyrene
     6        foam versus paper.  I think it was in 1991 they came down
     7        in favour of paper.  Are you conscious of that piece of
     8        work?
     9        A.  Yes, I am.
    10
    11   Q.   Why then, it may be asked, do McDonald's in Europe not go
    12        down that same route?
    13        A.  That has been a different comparison.
    14
    15   Q.   I was going to let you explain that.
    16        A.  OK.  As I said earlier, we had the foam clam shell and
    17        a paper board clam shell or a box.  The third option that
    18        is open is a paper wrapper.  It is a plastic coated paper
    19        wrapper, a quilt wrap, as they call it, in the States.
    20        This wrap has over the clam shell larger advantages because
    21        it is so much lighter than the paperboard clam shell.
    22
    23        Why McDonald's has not gone in that direction is to my
    24        understanding the following, is that has a lot of
    25        operational disadvantages.  It does present the sandwich a
    26        lot worse especially, for instance, in take-out, it crushes
    27        the sandwich a lot more, besides the operation to actually
    28        pack the sandwich in a wrapper is a lot more labour
    29        intensive than putting it into a clam shell box.
    30
    31   Q.   I do not know whether you are able to answer this,
    32        Mr. Van Erp; if you are not, then please say so.  Do you
    33        know as between the different European countries what are
    34        the perceived problems about the disposal of waste?  That
    35        is not a very well put question.  But, for example, are
    36        there distinctions or differences to be drawn between
    37        attitudes in, let us say, Germany on the one hand and
    38        France on the other?  Do you know the answer to that sort
    39        of a question?
    40        A.  I certainly would not pretend to know the whole answer
    41        to that question because I think few people do.  There is
    42        differences in these markets.  They are partially based on
    43        the fact that in Germany they have more trouble with a
    44        NIMBY syndrome; people do not want new waste disposal sites
    45        or incineration sites close to their place, partially
    46        because they already have so many so they are running out
    47        of landfill space.
    48
    49        That attitude is somewhat less in-- and then there is
    50        between France and Germany there is a difference in 
    51        attitude towards incineration where that is a lot more 
    52        accepted in France than in Germany.  The exact reasons for 
    53        that, I can only speculate about.
    54
    55   Q.   Can we now, please, look at some detail?   My Lord, Mr. Van
    56        Erp has got with him (since, to a large extent, his
    57        evidence consists of calculations) in the witness box his
    58        statement with the tables that go with it, the documents he
    59        produced for yesterday's hearing and, I believe, some notes
    60        he did in preparing his various tables and calculations; is

Prev Next Index