Day 103 - 14 Mar 95 - Page 20


     
     1        that there is any general allegation about bone chips or
     2        cartilage; even if there were, I wonder what relationship
     3        it has to food poisoning, I really do.
     4
     5   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I think it would help if you say where you
     6        are going.
     7
     8   MR. MORRIS:  First of all, it has been accepted that the main
     9        cause of complaints are objects in chicken, bones,
    10        cartilage, whatever.  Secondly, Mr. Kenny said that the
    11        existence of those kinds of things in a product would
    12        affect the cooking right through on the product, and what
    13        is more -----
    14
    15   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I understand all this, but you have evidence
    16        in relation to some bones in food.  I will have to consider
    17        how widespread, if at all, it is when it gets to the
    18        customer.  You have evidence about checks on the finished
    19        products for bones.  I really wonder how much it helps
    20        spending more than just a minute or two on the extent to
    21        which there is bone in the raw meat when it arrives at the
    22        Orleon factory.
    23
    24        Can I use it as an illustration, really, for your
    25        consideration, not just because it saves time but it saves
    26        you ending up at the end of the day with an awful lot of
    27        material which may not be of particular use to you.  We are
    28        in a food poisoning section and what is poisoned, if at
    29        all, is the customer.  So, the nearer you are to the
    30        customer with your evidence, the more relevant it is.  That
    31        is not to say when you get some distance away it has no
    32        relevance at all, but it begins to fade in strength so bear
    33        that in mind.
    34
    35   MR. MORRIS:  The problem we face -- I accept what you say -- is
    36        that the leaflet is very specific on what it says, but
    37        McDonald's have chosen to sue and -----
    38
    39   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I am not stopping you on that.  I am just
    40        saying when you got evidence, some evidence, as to how it
    41        reaches the customer, when you have evidence as to checks
    42        of the processed food as it leaves the factory, I really do
    43        want you to consider how much time is justified on thinking
    44        about bones in the raw meat.
    45
    46        I do not think I have given anything away if I did not say
    47        that, bearing in mind it is chicken bones which I have
    48        always understood to be rather susceptible to splintering
    49         -- hence the "do not give a chicken bone to a dog" rule --
    50        it would surprise me if there were not a fair number of 
    51        bits of bone in the raw meat.  What you are more interested 
    52        in is its state when it gets to the customer. 
    53
    54   MR. MORRIS:  Yes, and the X-ray.  (To the witness):  You do get
    55        of course quite a few chicken bones found in the final
    56        finished product, do you not?  I am talking about actually
    57        from customers giving the product back and complaining?
    58        A.  We do get reports of that, yes.
    59
    60   Q.   The company accepts they are -- Mr. Kenny, for example,

Prev Next Index