Day 147 - 04 Jul 95 - Page 09


     
     1
     2   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  That is not even an application, though, is
     3        it, because you were merely mentioning, really as a matter
     4        of courtesy, so that I had the opportunity to say anything
     5        if I wished to do so, what your clients were minded to do.
     6        In so far as that has any status at all, that was the full
     7        extent of it.
     8
     9   MR. RAMPTON:  So, too, my Lord, when I drew that document to
    10        your Lordship's attention the other day that the Defendants
    11        have been distributing outside court.  I was not asking for
    12        any order.  I was not making an application.  I was anxious
    13        that your Lordship should see it and know that it was
    14        false, in case it coloured your Lordship's view of
    15        McDonald's conduct.  There, again, I asked your Lordship to
    16        sit in chambers.  I could just have easily have done it in
    17        open court, in front of the press and the public, and
    18        thrown mud pies at the Defendants for all to see.  I chose
    19        not to do so.  That is why I have done it in this case in
    20        relation to the transcripts.
    21
    22        My Lord, Mr. Atkinson (who has a much better technical mind
    23        than I) reminds me, in case it should be important -- but
    24        I am not sure it is -- that a voir dire is different
    25        essentially, because it is of course a trial within a trial
    26        where evidence is given, and the public has a right to hear
    27        it.  On these applications, there are not even any
    28        affidavits, so there is no evidence to be heard before the
    29        court; it is merely a question of argument and allegations
    30        could be made -- well, allegations not only could be made,
    31        but will be made, I have absolutely no doubt -- which are
    32        unsupported by any evidence.  That is really what I am
    33        anxious to avoid.
    34
    35        If I am right about what the Defendants have been doing
    36        with the transcript and other matters in this case in order
    37        to try and exploit public opinion, it is something I would
    38        much rather avoid their having the opportunity of doing
    39        wherever possible.  I do not presently understand why
    40        questions of discovery and further and better particulars
    41        motivate the Defendants to talk about "public rights" and
    42        "free speech".
    43
    44   MS. STEEL:   Before I go into an answer, into that, I just
    45        wanted to raise one thing about the press statement which
    46        Mr. Rampton mentioned in court.  He has just said that he
    47        was anxious for you to see it and know it was false.  You
    48        do not know that it is false; you only know that it is
    49        their opinion that it is false.
    50 
    51   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I am not reaching any conclusion on that. 
    52 
    53   MS. STEEL:   Of course, we believe it is true.  Well, we know
    54        that it is true.  Regarding the -----
    55
    56   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Do you want to address me on whether these
    57        are interlocutory matters, first of all, because the note
    58        which Mr. Rampton referred to says that it is normal to
    59        hear them in chambers, and that is my experience, although,
    60        if the matter is thought to have some public importance,

Prev Next Index