Day 148 - 05 Jul 95 - Page 03


     
     1        also our own list.  If I can say right at the beginning
     2        that, unfortunately, we do not feel ready to make the
     3        applications on points 1 and 2.  A skeleton is being done
     4        for point 2.
     5
     6   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Let me just -----
     7
     8   MR. MORRIS:  This is our own list.
     9
    10   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  As I have said before, it is entirely up to
    11        you when you bring forward.  One thing I was going to say,
    12        and it particularly relates to 1 to 5 of your previous
    13        proposed amendments relating to destruction of the
    14        environment and matters relating to Brazil and soya and so
    15        on, which are almost entirely objected to by Mr. Rampton on
    16        behalf of McDonald's, is that when you deal with those
    17        I would also like you to deal with, apply your mind to,
    18        what discovery you think you might be entitled to were you
    19        to obtain the leave to amend.
    20
    21        Let me just explain why I say that.  What would normally
    22        happen is that a matter would be pleaded and then it would
    23        be incumbent upon all parties to provide a list of
    24        documents which they consider to be relevant to an issue
    25        arising out of a pleading.  If leave to amend a pleading is
    26        obtained after there has been the main discovery in the
    27        action -- and discovery in this action has been a
    28        continuous process so far as all parties are concerned --
    29        then the moment leave to amend is given all parties would
    30        have to apply their minds to what, if any, documents they
    31        ought to discover.  There might be none, there might be a
    32        lot, but they would have to apply their minds to it.
    33
    34        I would not as the judge, having given leave to amend, say
    35        you must discover this category of documents if you have it
    36        or that category.  Discovery would just automatically
    37        follow.
    38
    39        If there was then an issue about whether there had been
    40        complete and proper discovery, the party who was
    41        dissatisfied with discovery would raise the matter.
    42        Normally, they would make what we call an application for
    43        specific discovery, but in this case what has happened is
    44        that the matter has been raised and dealt with either
    45        formally or informally from time to time.  That would be
    46        the normal procedure.
    47
    48        If we followed that normal procedure, supposing, let us
    49        say, you got leave to amend at about the end of this month,
    50        we would not be grappling with any issue about discovery, 
    51        if there was an issue, until Michaelmas term and, 
    52        hopefully, we would be getting towards the end of the 
    53        witnesses by the time that was sorted out and time had been
    54        given for any specific discovery which might be ordered.
    55
    56   MR. MORRIS:  I think in many ways the purpose of this pleading
    57        is entirely to speed up that process because, effectively,
    58        the matters in these pleadings are things that have come
    59        out of the evidence in any case in court.
    60

Prev Next Index