Day 148 - 05 Jul 95 - Page 24
1 have it.
2
3 MR. MORRIS: I will give my one because I am sure I have another
4 copy at home anyway. I presume that the letters we are
5 sending to the Plaintiffs are being put in the
6 correspondence file.
7
8 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I think it is wrong to assume that because
9 all that is going into my correspondence file at the moment
10 is, for instance, the copies of letters which are written
11 to you and Ms. Steel enclosing a new witness statement, or
12 any other letter which is written to you and of which
13 Mrs. Brinley-Codd sends me a copy.
14
15 So if you have written letters which you want me to put in
16 my correspondence bundle, give me copies of them. You did
17 that on one or two occasions in the past.
18
19 MR. MORRIS: Yes, I just assumed they were going in.
20
21 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No, I think that is your job. If you want me
22 to have copies of letters you have written, bring a photo
23 copy along to court and I will put it in my correspondence
24 bundle.
25
26 MR. MORRIS: It may be helpful -- is it possible we can check
27 your correspondence bundle, maybe at lunch time or sometime
28 today?
29
30 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
31
32 MR. MORRIS: That would be very helpful. There was one other
33 matter. The Plaintiffs said they dealt with it, but if you
34 just bear with me, sorry. It was in your judgment.
35
36 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Do not concern yourself that in the
37 correspondence bundle you do not find the one you have
38 handed up because I am keeping my own separate core bundle
39 for the time being in relation to these applications.
40 I have put your copy in there, just as I put the two
41 letters which Mr. Rampton handed up the day before
42 yesterday in there. They will go back into the
43 correspondence bundle in due course.
44
45 MR. MORRIS: You made a ruling, a substantial ruling, on the
46 applications raised and argued since 6th February 1995.
47 I have not got a date for the ruling, but in that ruling
48 you ruled that the Plaintiffs should provide a list of meat
49 suppliers for the years 1979 to 1989 or any time within
50 that period.
51
52 You said that our application for that list was,
53 effectively, an interrogatory, not just an application for
54 an existing document, that if they could answer, i.e. if
55 they know which suppliers were supplying them with
56 beef-----
57
58 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Have you got a page?
59
60 MR. MORRIS: It was the whole first two pages of your judgment.