Day 156 - 17 Jul 95 - Page 02


     
     1                                           Monday 17th July, 1995.
     2
     3                     MR. TONY GIARDINA, recalled.
     4             Cross-Examined by the Defendants continued.
     5
     6   MR. MORRIS:  Just one thing, you gave me back the Jensen.
     7
     8   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.  I found I had two copies of each so in
     9        case you wanted further copies, you may as well have them
    10        back.
    11
    12   MR. MORRIS:  One other thing is that I have one ear completely
    13        blocked up at the moment, so I am finding it very hard to
    14        hear.
    15
    16   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  If you have any difficulty with anything
    17        anyone says, do not be bashful to ask them to repeat it and
    18        speak up.  We will all keep our voices up.
    19
    20   MR. MORRIS (To the witness):  In your statement, Mr. Giardina,
    21        you commented a couple of times about the attitude of
    22        Mr. Magee; you said you got the impression he was an
    23        employee who carried out his assigned tasks reasonably
    24        competently, but had an unsatisfactory attitude towards the
    25        Company and the job.  You said you are not surprised that
    26        he did not get a pay rise.  If someone carries out their
    27        job properly, why should they not get a pay rise just
    28        because they have what you call an unsatisfactory attitude?
    29        A.  Well, the performance reviews that we actually carry
    30        out, I think you have five grades, you have got
    31        unsatisfactory, it might be average, good, excellent and
    32        outstanding.  So, if an employee who is average, basically
    33        would not get a pay rise; if you are good, you would get a
    34        pay rise.  So, you know, if he fell in between that two
    35        areas, he would not get a pay rise.
    36
    37   Q.   Your point No. 18 in your statement, you said:  "Magee's
    38        allegation that he was under-paid is doubtful".  So it may
    39        be true then, you have some doubts?  It is possible he was
    40        under-paid?
    41        A.  Well, as I have stated previously, sometimes if crew
    42        members forget to clock out, OK, and then maybe they only
    43        work, say, Saturday, Sunday, and on Sunday night they fail
    44        to clock out, then obviously that person might not bring up
    45        the issue until the following week.  But, basically, we
    46        would sort the problem out straightaway if that was the
    47        case.
    48
    49   Q.   You said you worked about 35 hours in the store once it was
    50        up and running --- 
    51        A.  That is correct. 
    52 
    53   Q.   -- as far as your systems are concerned.  You said that
    54        girls under the age of 18 were not scheduled beyond 9.45?
    55        A.  That is correct.
    56
    57   Q.   But you would not have known, would you, if people
    58        continued over their schedule?  You would not personally
    59        have known ---
    60        A.  Yes, you would.

Prev Next Index