Day 163 - 25 Sep 95 - Page 15
1 MR. MORRIS: Store hygiene might be the easiest thing. There is
2 a list -- I believe it was served last term; in fact, it
3 might even have been brought up in cross-examination,
4 I cannot remember now -- it should be contained in the list
5 of documents served this morning. The amendments were
6 supplied to the Plaintiffs last week, Friday of last week.
7 The documents relating to the proposed amendments should be
8 the top documents now in your pile of documents after the
9 handwritten .....
10
11 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes, in fact, store hygiene is part of the
12 food poisoning section of the case, is it not?
13
14 MR. MORRIS: Yes. Basically, these are newspaper reports, this
15 series of documents which were printouts, in fact, the
16 whole printout was hundreds of pages, but the ones that
17 were referenced to McDonald's were printed out. I do not
18 know what the Plaintiffs complaint was -----
19
20 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Did I have a copy of that?
21
22 MR. MORRIS: I cannot remember. My vague recollection is that
23 we gave it to the Plaintiffs and that you said you did not
24 want it at the time.
25
26 MR. JUSTICE BELL: That is what I thought because you were going
27 to put some of the matters to Mr. Stein or were they -----
28
29 MR. MORRIS: You have it in front of you this morning though?
30 You have the document in front of you this morning.
31
32 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Where is that?
33
34 MR. MORRIS: I am sorry. It should be the top -- no, it will be
35 the -----
36
37 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I have something with level 1, 15 of 170
38 stores.
39
40 MR. MORRIS: That is the one.
41
42 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Then that is in two parts, or I have a
43 thinner -----
44
45 MR. MORRIS: Actually, there should be three different
46 documents. The top two of them are about child labour
47 violations, child labour law violations, and the third one
48 should be this 15 of 170 storeys. It has 8th March 1985 in
49 the top left-hand corner. I believe it is stapled so that
50 should be the one that we are looking at. I have not
51 numbered the pages, unfortunately, on this one. So I am
52 just going to quickly number the pages so we know maybe
53 what we are talking about. I make it nine pages.
54
55 The general situation, as we see it, is that the Plaintiffs
56 have brought up the issue of food poisoning as one of the
57 matters in dispute. The nature of the product has been
58 gone into to some extent -- to a significant extent. There
59 are other matters that could relate to food poisoning, such
60 as additives and whatever, but the Plaintiffs have