Day 175 - 18 Oct 95 - Page 24


     
     1        feel the entire exercise is an attempt to inhibit our
     2        witnesses when they come to the witness box and say that
     3        they are going to speak the truth and the whole truth, and
     4        then they are going to not be allowed to come out with the
     5        whole truth.
     6
     7        I am aware that the Plaintiffs have a right of rebuttal for
     8        something that was a new topic or a substantially new
     9        incident that named somebody that might wish to rebut that
    10        incident or something, although the Plaintiffs have not
    11        been able to trace anybody that worked in Sutton at that
    12        time, so I do not see how that would arise anyway.
    13
    14        But, you know, we are trying to comply with the spirit of
    15        what you are indicating.  The more restrictions that are
    16        put on us and the more deadlines, all it will mean is that
    17        the more work for us, the more inhibition for our
    18        witnesses, the less the truth will come out.  We are
    19        completely confident that our witnesses are going to be
    20        coming to give evidence and tell the truth relevant to this
    21        case.  We do not want the Plaintiffs to call further
    22        witnesses to rebut them; we do not care if they call a
    23        thousand witnesses to rebut them because we are confident
    24        of our case.
    25
    26        I think that is what I want to say really, that we will do
    27        our best to comply with whatever orders or indications that
    28        are made, but it should be borne in mind that we have an
    29        absolutely massive administrative task.  I think that it is
    30        bad enough for this case, but for people being sued for
    31        libel in the future, the more restrictions that are placed
    32        upon Defendants in person, the less likely someone is going
    33        to be able to fight a case.  That will not be in the
    34        interests of justice.
    35
    36        I think that people with resources such as the McDonald's
    37        Corporation are going to just walk all over any opposition
    38        if the court does not protect their interests.  I am not
    39        saying that you are not protecting our interests, but I am
    40        saying that this has come through after all their witnesses
    41        virtually have given evidence.  These are the beginning of
    42        our witnesses of fact, and suddenly, you know, all the
    43        inhibitions and restrictions are being brought to place.
    44
    45        I just think there should be some flexibility and give and
    46        take and understanding of our position, and a defence of
    47        our witnesses' interest that they have come to give
    48        evidence to give the whole truth, and they should be
    49        enabled by the court to give the whole truth.
    50 
    51        We will certainly do our best to comply with any 
    52        indications to the limit of our abilities.  Often, 
    53        unfortunately, it does mean that I have never met
    54        Mr. Whittle in my life until last night at 9 o'clock at
    55        night when he arrived and -----
    56
    57   MS. STEEL:   I have something to say, but I do not know whether
    58        you rather I said it now or afterwards.
    59
    60   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Say it now because I am minded when I do come

Prev Next Index