Day 177 - 26 Oct 95 - Page 12


     
     1        your Lordship agreed with that, that means that if the
     2        Defendants want my witnesses to go first, Mr. Logan would
     3        have to be transferred to that time at a date convenient to
     4        him and to the court -- when, in any event, as I have
     5        suggested, he is premature for the 9th and 10th anyway,
     6        because of the documentation.  It means of course, if that
     7        did happen, that Mr. Chester would have to leave December
     8        and rejoin the trial in January.  That, from our point of
     9        view -----
    10
    11   MR. JUSTICE BELL: Is that what you want or not?
    12
    13   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, I am going to be perfectly candid with
    14        your Lordship, as I always am.  In fact, it suits
    15        Mr. Chester very well.
    16
    17   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What, to come in January?
    18
    19   MR. RAMPTON:  Yes; for this reason, principally, that his coming
    20        in December and going over perhaps to Thursday in the last
    21        week of term had meant, and would still mean, that he was
    22        going to have to sacrifice his Christmas holiday with his
    23        family, which, since he sees not very much of them, he was
    24        willing to do but rather unhappy about.  That would mean
    25        that he would be able to have that holiday and then come in
    26        January, and we could start the whole rainforest issue
    27        afresh in January -- assuming always that we have finished
    28        employment by then.  I have a slightly pessimistic feeling
    29        about that.
    30
    31        Mrs. Brinley-Codd has just pointed out to me that none of
    32        what I have just said takes into account the fact that
    33        there are a number of the Defendants' witnesses who are
    34        still unscheduled.  I cannot remember their names.
    35
    36   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  One thing I was going to ask at some stage --
    37        because I have not kept relating back to the list of
    38        witnesses whom Mr. Morris said he was reasonably confident
    39        of being able to call -- I have pencilled in the employment
    40        witnesses who are referred to in either Mr. Morris' recent
    41        faxes or Mrs. Brinley-Codd's recent letters.  So, apart
    42        from those, how many others are there in the offing, as it
    43        were?  I mean, is it one or two, or four or five, or what?
    44
    45   MR. MORRIS:  I did have a list.  We have to call Adrian Brett
    46        from Colchester, Omid Shaffi from Colchester, Harrison and
    47        Harrison, the two Harrisons, from Colchester, and of course
    48        Mr. Coton from Colchester.  Then we have got Andrew
    49        Cramner, Peter Sutcliffe, Anne Tobin and Mr. Beech.  Now,
    50        Mr. Patel we have not been able to track down.  We are 
    51        still trying to do that.  That may result in a Civil 
    52        Evidence Act Notice application.  Rosemary Lovatt does not 
    53        really matter one way or the other, I do not think.  Did we
    54        read her evidence out?
    55
    56   MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes, you read her evidence.
    57
    58   MR. MORRIS:  Right.  So she is done.  The people from abroad,
    59        the ones that are not scheduled are Michael Boland and
    60        Danny Cantor -- sorry, Duncan.  Duncan, we may not call; we

Prev Next Index