Day 205 - 17 Jan 96 - Page 16


     
     1
     2   MR. MORRIS:   Page 49, in the middle of the page, we said, line
     3        23 -----
     4
     5   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I think you have a good point there, if I may
     6        say so, because there was the mention on 3rd October 1994
     7        which I had at that time forgotten.
     8
     9   MR. MORRIS:   We could not find that reference and we felt
    10        something was becoming currency which, in fact, we felt was
    11         -----
    12
    13   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I think that what I had remembered is what
    14        Mr. Rampton had said since ---
    15
    16   MR. MORRIS:   Yes.
    17
    18   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  -- which are the second and third of the
    19        three paragraphs on page 19 of 23rd November 1994 which we
    20        looked at a moment or so ago.
    21
    22   MR. MORRIS:   Yes.  I think that is the point we were trying to
    23        make.
    24
    25   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes, very well.
    26
    27   MS. STEEL:  I do not really want to say much, but I kind of get
    28        the impression that the view is that, why are we worried if
    29        Mr. Rampton is not objecting to the word "torture", and the
    30        part about utterly indifferent.  I mean, as far as I am
    31        concerned, I do think the Plaintiffs are indifferent and
    32        utterly indifferent.  I am not particularly worried from
    33        one point of view about whether we have to prove that
    34        because I think we could prove it quite easily.  But (a) it
    35        is a matter of opinion, and (b) if Mr. Rampton does make an
    36        admission, I think that it should hold because otherwise we
    37        are left in the situation of he says one thing one time and
    38        then the next time he says something different.  We do not
    39        actually know what it is that we have to prove while we are
    40        in court and whether or not we can prove it.  It adds extra
    41        length to the case and it just means more work for us
    42        anyway.
    43
    44        I do not really understand why it should be felt that a
    45        denial on a subsequent date should carry greater weight
    46        than a previous admission.  To me, the admissions are there
    47        in black and white during opening speeches and, clearly, on
    48        3rd October and it ought to stand.
    49
    50   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I think I cannot accept that, and this is 
    51        what concerns me, if that is what you believe, then you 
    52        must be careful that you do not let good points go, because 
    53        if I just do not accept that at the end of the day that,
    54        short of a formal admission or concession, one cannot think
    55        again, I feel you may neglect to put to me the points which
    56        you could put at the end of the case.
    57
    58        As I say, I will give Mr. Rampton an opportunity to say
    59        whatever he wants to say in a moment, but I think you have
    60        to accept that the Plaintiffs are saying that an

Prev Next Index