Day 245 - 07 May 96 - Page 05


     
     1   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  It is in dispute as to whether it was
     2        formerly rainforest at least to the extent of which parts
     3        ever were rainforest and if they were, when they were, so
     4        you have to be much more precise than that if it is going
     5        to be a useful question.
     6
     7   MR. MORRIS:  One example is we have had evidence from David
     8        Rose, which was unchallenged, a journalist from The
     9        Observer, who was told by Edi Bensilum that in Costa Rica
    10        McDonald's were using suppliers from land that was
    11        previously rainforest cleared in the 1950s up to the early
    12        1960s.
    13
    14        Your company have stated, and you have sued people and
    15        written in legal letters, for example to the BBC on 1st May
    16        1984:
    17
    18        "Neither the U.S. nor the Canadian companies nor any other
    19        McDonald's companies has used, or does use, meat which
    20        comes from cattle reared in former rainforest areas", and
    21        there are a number of ones I will not quote, but similarly
    22        you wrote to the Worldwide Life Fund similarly on 22nd
    23        February 1983, to Veggies, an Educational Organisation in
    24        Nottingham on 8th October 1987, an almost identical thing
    25        in the legal letter, and they were being sued over the
    26        London Greenpeace fact sheet, which incidentally they are
    27        still circulating, and you have been in charge of deciding
    28        who to sue in this country over the last 10 years?
    29        A.  I am the Chief Executive of McDonald's in this country
    30        as far as that goes, yes.
    31
    32   Q.   Do you accept those statements are not true?
    33        A.  I do not accept that.  I accept that McDonald's has not
    34        used beef totally consistently with our rainforest
    35        statement.  From the time we enter a country to think about
    36        setting up operations there, we do not use beef from
    37        rainforest land or former rainforest land.
    38
    39   Q.   That is not what the policy statement says.  Do you know
    40        what the rainforest policy statement says?
    41        A.  It says, just as I stated, from the time we begin
    42        looking at a country for operations, often times taking 12,
    43        14, 18, 36 months to get started, we do not use beef from
    44        rainforest land.
    45
    46   Q.   Right.  But if it had been previously cleared before you
    47        started in the country then that would be OK to be used.
    48        It is from the moment you start going into the country that
    49        is when ----
    50        A.  No, from the moment we begin exploring business 
    51        opportunities. 
    52 
    53   Q.   So the statement that you have never used any ex-rainforest
    54        land is not true, is it?
    55        A.  It is a true statement.
    56
    57   Q.   You say it is true but you do not know whether it is true
    58        or not basically?
    59        A.  McDonald's has a group of people who for years have
    60        consistently monitored our every activity as to purchasing

Prev Next Index