Day 256 - 04 Jun 96 - Page 17
1 if you will, mitigate their complex.
2
3 So, most science, unfortunately, in this field has been how
4 highly reductionist and without proper interpretation of
5 how these things work together. So, the China study was
6 actually organised with that in mind, to try to get a
7 better feel for how things do work together, how they
8 correlate with each other, how they add up their effects on
9 these various and sundry diseases.
10
11 MR. MORRIS: I will continue to read:
12
13 "The optimum lifetime blood cholesterol concentration may
14 be as low as 100-125 mg" -- what is "dL"?
15 A. Decilitre.
16
17 Q. ".....(compared to an average of concentration of about
18 210 mg/dL in the US."
19
20 That is comparing China to the US?
21 A. Right.
22
23 Q. "The same dietary factors which increase blood cholesterol
24 concentrations among Americans (at the much higher ranges)
25 also increase cholesterol at the lower concentrations of
26 the Chinese. These include, for example, increased intakes
27 of dietary fat and animal protein and decreased intakes of
28 dietary fibre and legumes. Moreover, the lower the blood
29 cholesterol, the lower the risk for various cancers; there
30 is no evidence of a cholesterol threshold below which
31 further decreases in disease would not occur. These two
32 facts are quite remarkable, in that they suggest that
33 almost any consumption of animal-based foods (higher in
34 fat, lower in fibre) may increase blood cholesterol (among
35 many other biochemical changes) from a very low level, this
36 to be followed by a significant increase in the prevalence
37 of the degenerative diseases (many other analyses of these
38 same data for individual diet-disease relationships support
39 this interpretation)."
40
41 If I just ask you a question. You talk about the
42 relationship between cholesterol and various cancers, and
43 the risk increases as the blood cholesterol rises.
44 Regarding cancer and heart disease, what kind of
45 relationship is that increased risk; is it linear, is it
46 slight, what is the -----
47 A. Our evidence suggests that it is linear; and that was
48 another exciting part of the China Project, that in Western
49 studies -- and most studies, in fact, have really been done
50 amongst Western subjects -- were generally working with
51 people whose cholesterol levels ranged between about 160 to
52 170 or so milligrams per decilitre, up to about 300 and
53 320, in that range. So we see a linear relationship
54 between cholesterol level and disease prevalence for these
55 different diseases.
56
57 In China, in contrast, the range of their cholesterol was
58 between about 90 milligrams per decilitre for an average in
59 one county, up to a high of 170 milligrams per decilitre
60 average for another county. So, we are talking about 90 up