Day 260 - 11 Jun 96 - Page 18
1 and I was surprised that it was accepted, as no one knew
2 who on earth I was.
3
4 Q. Were you surprised that the views of someone was so new
5 could carry that much weight?
6
7 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Well, what is it going at, the diversity of
8 views or -----
9
10 MR. MORRIS: I am not worried about the content. I am
11 saying -----
12
13 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Because it was so democratic, or what?
14
15 MR. MORRIS: Yes; that people's contributions should be equally
16 considered, even if they are someone who has just walked in
17 the door and nobody knows them.
18
19 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I just wondered whether there was some
20 special point in relation to an issue in this case. But
21 there we are. Anyway, he was surprised.
22
23 MR. MORRIS: But that kind of situation, where somebody can make
24 a contribution even if they are only at the first meeting,
25 and it would be listened to, that was the general feature,
26 was it, of meetings throughout the time you attended?
27 A. Yes, I would say so.
28
29 MS. STEEL: In the notes of 24th May, it says: "I attended this
30 week's meeting at 19.30 hours to find only two people
31 present, Anthony of Finsbury Park and Jonathan of
32 Southall." Again, Anthony of Finsbury Park is
33 Mr. Pocklington, who is here in court today?
34 A. Yes, I assume so, yes, as far as I can recall.
35
36 Q. "These two were engaged in answering correspondence from
37 various sources. Most of the letters appeared to be
38 answered by enclosing an existing leaflet on the relevant
39 subject."
40
41 What you are referring to there, do you remember whether or
42 not that included anti-McDonald's leaflets?
43 A. I cannot remember.
44
45 Q. On that occasion?
46 A. No.
47
48 MR. MORRIS: Can I ask a legal question?
49
50 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Yes.
51
52 MR. MORRIS: The witness has stated that these were notes made,
53 you know, contemporaneously or the next day, or something,
54 and that this is the basis of his memories and, indeed, the
55 statements that have been made. So, do we need to ask him
56 formally whether -- for example, if we read something out,
57 that they were answering correspondence from various
58 sources, do we have to say to the witness each time: "Is
59 that your recollection", or do we just assume, can we
60 assume that if we read something out, it will be the