Day 278 - 11 Jul 96 - Page 12


     
     1        know not whose handwriting it is, but it has got the date
     2        9th January 1991 at the top of it.  Now please read to
     3        yourself the first column and a half, starting "starving
     4        the poor" and ending just above the heading "slaughtering
     5        the innocent".
     6        A.  Yes.
     7
     8   Q.   That is a huge retreat, would you agree, from what is in
     9        the fact sheet and what is in the shorter A5 version that
    10        we looked at just a moment ago?
    11        A.  It is worded differently, somebody else obviously wrote
    12        it.
    13
    14   Q.   And may I suggest to you the reason why it is different in
    15        this way?  It is depersonalised, it is not targeting
    16        McDonald's with the "use of lethal poisons" et cetera, the
    17        "800 square miles" are absent, they are not mentioned.
    18        And the reason for that, Miss Steel, is that it was
    19        realised that what was in the fact sheet could not be
    20        supported?
    21        A.  That is not what -- I mean, to me somebody else has
    22        done, has rewritten the leaflet.  Mr. Gravett said himself
    23        that he was planning to update the leaflet even before
    24        anybody knew anything about the writs, to incorporate new
    25        information such as the stuff that is here about HCFC's.
    26        Somebody else has written it, they have obviously got a
    27        different style of writing and, you know, that is about all
    28        I can say about it, really.
    29
    30   Q.   Well, look, please, at the second page under "Mclibel" and
    31        see if you really mean what you just said?
    32        A.  Under "Mclibel"?
    33
    34   Q.   Yes, on the bottom of the second page?
    35        A.  Yes.
    36
    37   Q.   The fact is, as I put to you a moment ago, that this was
    38        rewritten because you knew you could not defend the
    39        rainforest allegations in the original fact sheet?
    40        A.  I did not rewrite it, so I can't say, but I would say
    41        no.
    42
    43   Q.   All right.
    44        A.  I would say it was updated to take account of new
    45        developments, such as HCFC's and such as this case.
    46
    47   MR. RAMPTON:  The truth, Miss Steel, is this, is it not, you are
    48        in some sense, and have been ever since you have been quite
    49        a young person, at war with the world in which you found
    50        yourself and that you and your colleagues picked McDonald's
    51        as something to kick; is that right?
    52        A.  No, that is not right.
    53
    54   Q.   And that--
    55        A.  No, hang on, that is not right.
    56
    57   Q.   You want to expand on it?
    58        A.  Since, as I have been growing up and I have seen damage
    59        to the environment, heard about nuclear power, things like
    60        that, things that I have not seen with my own eyes but

Prev Next Index