Day 279 - 12 Jul 96 - Page 15


     
     1        refresh people's memories.  If you put a note in front of
     2        someone in the witness box and say, "Is what that note says
     3        correct?" and he says, "Yes", that does not make the note
     4        evidence.  He is, in effect, saying what is in the note.
     5        So, it is his evidence.
     6
     7   MR. MORRIS:  If he says it is not correct, can it then be relied
     8        on as evidence?
     9
    10   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  No.  But what I propose to do, unless you
    11        have got an argument now, it is putting off the evil day
    12        yet again but in case you think it is important, you have
    13        got someone, you hope, coming to represent you on another
    14        matter next Wednesday or Thursday, you can pursue the
    15        argument now and put me to a decision on it if you want and
    16        if you are prepared to do that, well and good.  But I am
    17        going to give you the option of putting it off until
    18        Wednesday and Thursday, because at the moment -- or
    19        Thursday -- because at the moment it appears to me that it
    20        stops you in your tracks in relation to all the parts of
    21        Miss Clauphine Carston's statement, or letter, which Mr.
    22        Rampton objected to.  There may be the odd sentence here
    23        and there in those parts, there is one sentence which may
    24        be admissible anyway.  There are bits and pieces which may
    25        not rely upon quotes, but at the moment I think it is
    26        impossible to tease them out from those which do rely on
    27        quotes.  One cannot, in other words, take a blue pencil to
    28        the letter.
    29
    30   MR. MORRIS:  Yes.  I am not saying that there is a need to be
    31        made straight away but our position would be, in any event,
    32        that we are entitled to rely on the fact that she was told
    33        these matters, because in any event the plaintiffs are
    34        relying on, for the counterclaim, on the fact of service of
    35        witness statements.
    36
    37   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Quite frankly, we do not need to read
    38        statements and articles for that.  The article falls into
    39        just the same -- you did not have Miss Clauphine Carston's
    40        statement at the time?
    41
    42   MR. MORRIS:  No, but we had the article which is in the
    43        pleadings.
    44
    45   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  You had the article, so really what you are
    46        doing is relying on the article for that, which puts it in
    47        exactly the same position as all the other newspaper and
    48        magazine articles in other spheres.
    49
    50   MR. MORRIS:  Then the article would be admissible of the fact
    51        that it exists and also that we have verified that these
    52        were the quotes which she--
    53
    54   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I am not going to have it read out on that
    55        basis.
    56
    57   MR. MORRIS:  We do not have to read it out.  The main thing is
    58        it would be admissible.  We do not have to read it all
    59        out.  We are not bothered about reading it all out, but we
    60        do want to rely on it.  The question is whether we can rely

Prev Next Index