Day 301 - 15 Nov 96 - Page 32
1 result-----
2
3 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I cannot see the company responsible for
4 that, it was a bizarre criminal offence.
5
6 MS. STEEL: I don't think they were responsible for the hoax,
7 but they were responsible for the pressure that people were
8 under.
9
10 MR JUSTICE BELL: Maybe, but I don't think you can blame
11 something like that on pressure of work. It is just a
12 thoroughly criminal aberration of the person concerned. It
13 is not to detract from the strength of your case about
14 pressure in other respects. But, quite frankly, I think
15 someone who does something like that, I cannot say that it
16 is in any way a logical or foreseeable reaction to
17 pressure, however great.
18
19 MR. MORRIS: Moving on to general conditions, we showed
20 Mr. Nicholson the 'one every mile' documentary which was
21 filmed with McDonald's permission inside two London stores
22 and portrayed the reality of the high pressure of working
23 conditions for crew members. Mr. Nicholson agreed the
24 conditions shown were "typical of high volume stores".
25 That is day 119, page 12, line 37. Crew were filmed
26 complaining about the pay, about pay rises being delayed.
27 Page 15, line 48. About hours of work being underrecorded,
28 that was page 15, line 16, and that the speed of work "does
29 your head in", that is what someone said on the film.
30 Commenting on the fact that there was a preponderance in
31 the film of managers with an ex-military background.
32 Mr. Nicholson said such people bring "a sense of
33 discipline" to McDonald's stores, and that was on page 17,
34 line 34 of that day.
35
36 There was a great deal of fuss initially from the
37 Plaintiffs about this film being outrageous, these
38 conditions are just totally exaggerated. They are working
39 too fast and the long and short of it was, especially
40 following Mr. Nicholson's admission that the commissions
41 were typical of high volume stores, and then the
42 manageress, Miss Antenno, giving evidence and also, of
43 course, the researcher of the film gave evidence for us.
44 At the end of the day, it turns out that McDonald's were
45 actually quite happy with the film as an accurate portrayal
46 -- an accurate portrayal, we would say, of the high
47 pressured corner cutting, low paid work environment and
48 authoritarian management.
49
50 Turnover. In March 1990, the company's annualised turnover
51 in the UK was 196.5 percent per year. Day 118, page 9,
52 line 13. We have heard how in the USA it was roughly the
53 same around that time, and even greater in the previous
54 couple of years. We will dig out those figures a bit later
55 on.
56
57 The Corporation's confidential operations manual was
58 quoted. "Staffing and retention are closely related
59 issues." Now that is quite an important point. Closely
60 related. The worse the staffing levels, we say, the more