Day 302 - 18 Nov 96 - Page 05


     
     1        witness date and some other form of identifying it, which
     2        are the other parts which were not referred to at all which
     3        you say are in evidence, first of all, by reason of the
     4        argument which is in your submissions and, secondly, you
     5        say, are matters of sufficient importance to draw my
     6        attention to them.
     7
     8   MR. RAMPTON:   Yes, my Lord.  I mean, that I will, I do
     9        understand and so far as I am able I will do it as quickly
    10        as I possibly can.  I say that because of one thing I will
    11        say in a moment to your Lordship, because Mr. Glenn asked
    12        me about it after the Defendants had left court on Friday
    13        and I thought it only right that I should tell
    14        your Lordship in front of the Defendants what I said, so I
    15        will in a moment.
    16
    17        I have some time constraints for various reasons, which
    18        I will explain later, but I will do that.  I know
    19        barristers talk too much.  The only thing I would like to
    20        add to what your Lordship has just said is this:  there
    21        will be passages in the notes which were referred to either
    22        in cross-examination or examination-in-chief which were
    23        not, as it were, specifically used to refresh memory.  The
    24        main function of the legal submission, if it be right in
    25        law, is to make not only the parts which were used in-chief
    26        for memory refreshing or verification but everything else
    27        as well that the witnesses said about the notes.
    28
    29   MR. JUSTICE BELL:   I understand that that is your argument.  I
    30        mean, I have not even formed a preliminary view on whether
    31        you are right or not.  I am sure you have thought about it
    32        carefully and would not put it in if you did not think you
    33        were right in law.
    34
    35   MR. RAMPTON:   Then the question falls, if we are wrong.
    36
    37   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.
    38
    39   MR. RAMPTON:   What I will do is have a good look and see if
    40        there is anything which was not specifically referred to in
    41        oral evidence which I think is important, and I would like
    42        your Lordship to look at.  It may be there is nothing,
    43        I really honestly cannot remember.  If there is, then I
    44        will do that as soon as I possibly can.
    45
    46        Can I then move on very quickly just to say what I told
    47        Mr. Glenn, who made an inquiry in a sense what shape
    48        I thought my closing submissions would take.  The answer is
    49        that the vast ----
    50
    51   MR. JUSTICE BELL:   I must say I did not know he had made an
    52        inquiry.  It was not promoted by me.
    53
    54   MR. RAMPTON:   I am sorry, but as I told him, and obviously he
    55        must reported back to your Lordship anything I said that he
    56        thought your Lordship ought to hear, I thought I ought to
    57        say is this open court, which is that the vast majority of
    58        it will be in typewritten form.  I am afraid it will be
    59        very long, about 500 pages.  Not whole pages, because
    60        I have used only about two-thirds of the page for text and

Prev Next Index