| From: | Andrew Bell |
| Date: | 2 Jan 2000 at 20:55:55 |
| Subject: | Re: Amiga is not y2k compliant |
From: Andrew Bell <andrew.ab2000@bigfoot.com>
Hi Richard,
On 02-Jan-00 you wrote: [amigactive] Re: Amiga is not y2k compliant
> With files having datestamp (2-Jan-00 19:40) a listing of the
> archive shows these as 02-Jan-128. However, the files when unpacked
> have their datestamp set to the time that they where unpacked.
>
> I wonder how many other old programs we'll discover over the coming
> weeks thst are not Y2K complient?
Older versions of MicroDot (NC version 1) print "100" instead of "00"
and Hisoft C++ has similar problems with the strftime() ANSI
function. LHA 2.1 prints "100" instead of "00" at the very bottom of a
verbose listing.
Regards, Andrew Bell.
+----------------------------------------+
email: mailto:andrew.ab2000@bigfoot.com or
mailto:andrew@ab2000.prestel.co.uk
web: http://www2.prestel.co.uk/ab2000
+----------------------------------------+
Jury (n): 12 persons who decide who has the best lawyer
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
Independent contractors: Find your next project gig through JobSwarm!
You can even make money by referring friends.
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/jobswarm2 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote carefully and read all ADMIN:README mails